ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Jonas Eliasson - Transportation specialist
Jonas Eliasson is dedicated to researching transportation flow, analyzing how people think about their commutes and what can influence their travel decisions.

Why you should listen

Jonas Eliasson studies how small charges on crowded bridges effect traffic, what makes a person opt to bike to work and how far people choose to live from public transportation. The Director of the Centre for Transport Studies at Sweden’s Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Eliasson helped design, plan and evaluate Stockholm’s congestion tax, which was piloted in 2006 and made permanent in 2007. Eliasson is frequently brought on by other cities that are considering similar fees for rush hour use of crowded roads.

Eliasson has modeled and appraised several major infrastructure investments in Sweden, and chairs the committee for transport modeling of the country’s National Transport Investment Plan.

More profile about the speaker
Jonas Eliasson | Speaker | TED.com
TEDxHelvetia

Jonas Eliasson: How to solve traffic jams

Filmed:
1,347,202 views

It's an unfortunate reality in nearly every major city—road congestion, especially during rush hours. Jonas Eliasson reveals how subtly nudging just a small percentage of drivers to stay off major roads can make traffic jams a thing of the past.
- Transportation specialist
Jonas Eliasson is dedicated to researching transportation flow, analyzing how people think about their commutes and what can influence their travel decisions. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:17
Hi. I'm here to talk about congestion,
0
1725
2917
00:20
namely road congestion.
1
4642
1354
00:21
Road congestion is a pervasive phenomenon.
2
5996
2261
00:24
It exists in basically all of the cities all around the world,
3
8257
2860
00:27
which is a little bit surprising when you think about it.
4
11117
1948
00:28
I mean, think about how different cities are, actually.
5
13065
2963
00:31
I mean, you have the typical European cities,
6
16028
1762
00:33
with a dense urban core, good public transportation
7
17790
2992
00:36
mostly, not a lot of road capacity.
8
20782
2455
00:39
But then, on the other hand, you have the American cities.
9
23237
2449
00:41
It's moving by itself, okay.
10
25686
2791
00:44
Anyway, the American cities:
11
28477
3006
00:47
lots of roads dispersed over large areas,
12
31483
2928
00:50
almost no public transportation.
13
34411
1459
00:51
And then you have the emerging world cities,
14
35870
2210
00:53
with a mixed variety of vehicles,
15
38080
1526
00:55
mixed land-use patterns, also rather dispersed
16
39606
2542
00:58
but often with a very dense urban core.
17
42148
2599
01:00
And traffic planners all around the world have tried
18
44747
2402
01:03
lots of different measures: dense cities or dispersed cities,
19
47149
3654
01:06
lots of roads or lots of public transport
20
50803
2551
01:09
or lots of bike lanes or more information,
21
53354
2786
01:12
or lots of different things, but nothing seems to work.
22
56140
3794
01:15
But all of these attempts have one thing in common.
23
59934
3003
01:18
They're basically attempts at figuring out
24
62937
2351
01:21
what people should do instead of rush hour car driving.
25
65288
3327
01:24
They're essentially, to a point, attempts at planning
26
68615
3112
01:27
what other people should do, planning their life for them.
27
71727
3202
01:30
Now, planning a complex social system
28
74929
2452
01:33
is a very hard thing to do, and let me tell you a story.
29
77381
3075
01:36
Back in 1989, when the Berlin Wall fell,
30
80456
2727
01:39
an urban planner in London got a phone call
31
83183
2622
01:41
from a colleague in Moscow saying, basically,
32
85805
2550
01:44
"Hi, this is Vladimir. I'd like to know,
33
88355
2518
01:46
who's in charge of London's bread supply?"
34
90873
3022
01:49
And the urban planner in London goes,
35
93895
1653
01:51
"What do you mean, who's in charge of London's —
36
95548
1970
01:53
I mean, no one is in charge."
37
97518
1271
01:54
"Oh, but surely someone must be in charge.
38
98789
1882
01:56
I mean, it's a very complicated system. Someone must control all of this."
39
100671
3656
02:00
"No. No. No one is in charge.
40
104327
3106
02:03
I mean, it basically -- I haven't really thought of it.
41
107433
2601
02:05
It basically organizes itself."
42
110034
2589
02:08
It organizes itself.
43
112623
2577
02:11
That's an example of a complex social system
44
115200
2843
02:13
which has the ability of self-organizing,
45
118043
2728
02:16
and this is a very deep insight.
46
120771
2588
02:19
When you try to solve really complex social problems,
47
123359
3313
02:22
the right thing to do is most of the time
48
126672
1716
02:24
to create the incentives.
49
128388
1591
02:25
You don't plan the details,
50
129979
1944
02:27
and people will figure out what to do,
51
131923
2620
02:30
how to adapt to this new framework.
52
134543
1860
02:32
And let's now look at how we can use this insight
53
136403
3491
02:35
to combat road congestion.
54
139894
1636
02:37
This is a map of Stockholm, my hometown.
55
141530
2232
02:39
Now, Stockholm is a medium-sized city, roughly two million people,
56
143762
3641
02:43
but Stockholm also has lots of water and lots of water
57
147403
2789
02:46
means lots of bridges -- narrow bridges, old bridges --
58
150192
3277
02:49
which means lots of road congestion.
59
153469
3035
02:52
And these red dots show the most congested parts,
60
156504
3640
02:56
which are the bridges that lead into the inner city.
61
160144
2577
02:58
And then someone came up with the idea that,
62
162721
2526
03:01
apart from good public transport,
63
165247
1837
03:02
apart from spending money on roads,
64
167084
2601
03:05
let's try to charge drivers one or two euros at these bottlenecks.
65
169685
4215
03:09
Now, one or two euros, that isn't really a lot of money,
66
173900
2924
03:12
I mean compared to parking charges and running costs, etc.,
67
176824
2657
03:15
so you would probably expect that car drivers
68
179481
2718
03:18
wouldn't really react to this fairly small charge.
69
182199
2438
03:20
You would be wrong.
70
184637
1300
03:21
One or two euros was enough to make 20 percent of cars
71
185937
4028
03:25
disappear from rush hours.
72
189965
2384
03:28
Now, 20 percent, well, that's a fairly huge figure, you might think,
73
192349
3551
03:31
but you've still got 80 percent left of the problem, right?
74
195900
2207
03:34
Because you still have 80 percent of the traffic.
75
198107
1869
03:35
Now, that's also wrong, because traffic happens to be
76
199976
3267
03:39
a nonlinear phenomenon, meaning that
77
203243
2692
03:41
once you reach above a certain capacity threshold
78
205935
3141
03:44
then congestion starts to increase really, really rapidly.
79
209076
3168
03:48
But fortunately, it also works the other way around.
80
212244
2460
03:50
If you can reduce traffic even somewhat, then congestion
81
214704
3331
03:53
will go down much faster than you might think.
82
218035
3629
03:57
Now, congestion charges were introduced in Stockholm
83
221664
2891
04:00
on January 3, 2006, and the first picture here is a picture
84
224555
4604
04:05
of Stockholm, one of the typical streets, January 2.
85
229159
3983
04:09
The first day with the congestion charges looked like this.
86
233142
3813
04:12
This is what happens when you take away
87
236955
2920
04:15
20 percent of the cars from the streets.
88
239875
2065
04:17
You really reduce congestion quite substantially.
89
241940
2710
04:20
But, well, as I said, I mean, car drivers adapt, right?
90
244650
3658
04:24
So after a while they would all come back because they
91
248308
2502
04:26
have sort of gotten used to charges.
92
250810
1948
04:28
Wrong again. It's now six and a half years ago
93
252758
3676
04:32
since the congestion charges were introduced in Stockholm,
94
256434
1983
04:34
and we basically have the same low traffic levels still.
95
258417
3989
04:38
But you see, there's an interesting gap here in the time series
96
262406
2271
04:40
in 2007.
97
264677
1463
04:42
Well, the thing is that, the congestion charges,
98
266140
2389
04:44
they were introduced first as a trial, so they were introduced
99
268529
3096
04:47
in January and then abolished again at the end of July,
100
271625
3969
04:51
followed by a referendum, and then they were reintroduced
101
275594
2594
04:54
again in 2007, which of course was a wonderful scientific opportunity.
102
278188
4200
04:58
I mean, this was a really fun experiment to start with,
103
282388
4137
05:02
and we actually got to do it twice.
104
286525
1781
05:04
And personally, I would like to do this every once a year or so,
105
288306
2109
05:06
but they won't let me do that.
106
290415
1488
05:07
But it was fun anyway.
107
291903
2185
05:09
So, we followed up. What happened?
108
294088
3385
05:13
This is the last day with the congestion charges, July 31,
109
297473
3866
05:17
and you see the same street but now it's summer,
110
301339
1778
05:19
and summer in Stockholm is a very nice
111
303117
1744
05:20
and light time of the year,
112
304861
2250
05:23
and the first day without the congestion charges
113
307111
2843
05:25
looked like this.
114
309954
1367
05:27
All the cars were back again, and you even have to admire
115
311321
2663
05:29
the car drivers. They adapt so extremely quickly.
116
313984
2910
05:32
The first day they all came back.
117
316894
2247
05:35
And this effect hanged on. So 2007 figures looked like this.
118
319141
5350
05:40
Now these traffic figures are really exciting
119
324491
2331
05:42
and a little bit surprising and very useful to know,
120
326822
2651
05:45
but I would say that the most surprising slide here
121
329473
2759
05:48
I'm going to show you today is not this one. It's this one.
122
332232
4030
05:52
This shows public support for congestion pricing of Stockholm,
123
336262
3331
05:55
and you see that when congestion pricing were introduced
124
339593
2669
05:58
in the beginning of Spring 2006, people were fiercely against it.
125
342262
4317
06:02
Seventy percent of the population didn't want this.
126
346579
3028
06:05
But what happened when the congestion charges
127
349607
1648
06:07
were there is not what you would expect, that people hated it more and more.
128
351255
3461
06:10
No, on the contrary, they changed, up to a point
129
354716
3153
06:13
where we now have 70 percent support for keeping the charges,
130
357869
3701
06:17
meaning that -- I mean, let me repeat that:
131
361570
1841
06:19
70 percent of the population in Stockholm
132
363411
2807
06:22
want to keep a price for something that used to be free.
133
366218
3993
06:26
Okay. So why can that be? Why is that?
134
370211
3626
06:29
Well, think about it this way. Who changed?
135
373837
3000
06:32
I mean, the 20 percent of the car drivers that disappeared,
136
376837
2626
06:35
surely they must be discontent in a way.
137
379463
1945
06:37
And where did they go? If we can understand this,
138
381408
2334
06:39
then maybe we can figure out how people can be so happy with this.
139
383742
4130
06:43
Well, so we did this huge interview survey
140
387872
2402
06:46
with lots of travel services, and tried to figure out
141
390274
1835
06:48
who changed, and where did they go?
142
392109
1755
06:49
And it turned out that they don't know themselves. (Laughter)
143
393864
4414
06:54
For some reason, the car drivers are --
144
398278
4848
06:59
they are confident they actually drive the same way that they used to do.
145
403126
3496
07:02
And why is that? It's because that travel patterns
146
406622
2256
07:04
are much less stable than you might think.
147
408878
2399
07:07
Each day, people make new decisions, and people change
148
411277
2831
07:10
and the world changes around them, and each day
149
414108
2425
07:12
all of these decisions are sort of nudged ever so slightly
150
416533
3253
07:15
away from rush hour car driving
151
419786
1967
07:17
in a way that people don't even notice.
152
421753
2584
07:20
They're not even aware of this themselves.
153
424337
2045
07:22
And the other question, who changed their mind?
154
426382
2801
07:25
Who changed their opinion, and why?
155
429183
1966
07:27
So we did another interview survey, tried to figure out
156
431149
2526
07:29
why people changed their mind, and what type of group changed their minds?
157
433675
4376
07:33
And after analyzing the answers, it turned out that
158
438051
2893
07:36
more than half of them believe that they haven't changed their minds.
159
440944
3885
07:40
They're actually confident that they have
160
444829
2287
07:43
liked congestion pricing all along.
161
447116
2689
07:45
Which means that we are now in a position
162
449805
1719
07:47
where we have reduced traffic across this toll cordon
163
451524
2993
07:50
with 20 percent, and reduced congestion by enormous numbers,
164
454517
3211
07:53
and people aren't even aware that they have changed,
165
457728
3547
07:57
and they honestly believe that they have liked this all along.
166
461275
3911
08:01
This is the power of nudges when trying to solve
167
465186
3474
08:04
complex social problems, and when you do that,
168
468660
2632
08:07
you shouldn't try to tell people how to adapt.
169
471292
3630
08:10
You should just nudge them in the right direction.
170
474922
2187
08:13
And if you do it right,
171
477109
1722
08:14
people will actually embrace the change,
172
478831
2052
08:16
and if you do it right, people will actually even like it.
173
480883
3062
08:19
Thank you. (Applause)
174
483945
3325
Translated by Joseph Geni
Reviewed by Morton Bast

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Jonas Eliasson - Transportation specialist
Jonas Eliasson is dedicated to researching transportation flow, analyzing how people think about their commutes and what can influence their travel decisions.

Why you should listen

Jonas Eliasson studies how small charges on crowded bridges effect traffic, what makes a person opt to bike to work and how far people choose to live from public transportation. The Director of the Centre for Transport Studies at Sweden’s Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Eliasson helped design, plan and evaluate Stockholm’s congestion tax, which was piloted in 2006 and made permanent in 2007. Eliasson is frequently brought on by other cities that are considering similar fees for rush hour use of crowded roads.

Eliasson has modeled and appraised several major infrastructure investments in Sweden, and chairs the committee for transport modeling of the country’s National Transport Investment Plan.

More profile about the speaker
Jonas Eliasson | Speaker | TED.com