sponsored links
TEDxZurich 2011

James B. Glattfelder: Who controls the world?

October 25, 2012

James Glattfelder studies complexity: how an interconnected system -- say, a swarm of birds -- is more than the sum of its parts. And complexity theory, it turns out, can reveal a lot about how the economy works. Glattfelder shares a groundbreaking study of how control flows through the global economy, and how concentration of power in the hands of a shockingly small number leaves us all vulnerable. (Filmed at TEDxZurich.)

James B. Glattfelder - Complex systems theorist
James B. Glattfelder aims to give us a richer, data-driven understanding of the people and interactions that control our global economy. He does this not to push an ideology -- but with the hopes of making the world a better place. Full bio

sponsored links
Double-click the English subtitles below to play the video.
"When the crisis came,
00:15
the serious limitations of existing economic
00:18
and financial models immediately became apparent."
00:21
"There is also a strong belief, which I share,
00:26
that bad or oversimplistic and overconfident economics
00:31
helped create the crisis."
00:36
Now, you've probably all heard of similar criticism
00:38
coming from people who are skeptical of capitalism.
00:40
But this is different.
00:44
This is coming from the heart of finance.
00:45
The first quote is from Jean-Claude Trichet
00:49
when he was governor of the European Central Bank.
00:52
The second quote is from the head
00:56
of the U.K. Financial Services Authority.
00:58
Are these people implying
01:02
that we don't understand the economic systems
01:03
that drive our modern societies?
01:06
It gets worse.
01:09
"We spend billions of dollars
01:11
trying to understand the origins of the universe
01:13
while we still don't understand the conditions
01:16
for a stable society, a functioning economy, or peace."
01:20
What's happening here? How can this be possible?
01:29
Do we really understand more about the fabric of reality
01:32
than we do about the fabric
01:35
which emerges from our human interactions?
01:36
Unfortunately, the answer is yes.
01:40
But there's an intriguing solution which is coming
01:42
from what is known as the science of complexity.
01:45
To explain what this means and what this thing is,
01:50
please let me quickly take a couple of steps back.
01:53
I ended up in physics by accident.
01:56
It was a random encounter when I was young,
01:59
and since then, I've often wondered
02:02
about the amazing success of physics
02:04
in describing the reality we wake up in every day.
02:06
In a nutshell, you can think of physics as follows.
02:10
So you take a chunk of reality you want to understand
02:14
and you translate it into mathematics.
02:17
You encode it into equations.
02:21
Then predictions can be made and tested.
02:24
We're actually really lucky that this works,
02:28
because no one really knows why the thoughts in our heads
02:30
should actually relate to the fundamental workings of the universe.
02:33
Despite the success, physics has its limits.
02:39
As Dirk Helbing pointed out in the last quote,
02:43
we don't really understand the complexity
02:45
that relates to us, that surrounds us.
02:48
This paradox is what got me interested in complex systems.
02:51
So these are systems which are made up
02:56
of many interconnected or interacting parts:
02:57
swarms of birds or fish, ant colonies,
03:01
ecosystems, brains, financial markets.
03:05
These are just a few examples.
03:08
Interestingly, complex systems are very hard to map
03:13
into mathematical equations,
03:18
so the usual physics approach doesn't really work here.
03:20
So what do we know about complex systems?
03:24
Well, it turns out that what looks like complex behavior
03:26
from the outside is actually the result
03:30
of a few simple rules of interaction.
03:33
This means you can forget about the equations
03:37
and just start to understand the system
03:42
by looking at the interactions,
03:44
so you can actually forget about the equations
03:46
and you just start to look at the interactions.
03:49
And it gets even better, because most complex systems
03:51
have this amazing property called emergence.
03:54
So this means that the system as a whole
03:57
suddenly starts to show a behavior
04:00
which cannot be understood or predicted
04:01
by looking at the components of the system.
04:05
So the whole is literally more than the sum of its parts.
04:07
And all of this also means that you can forget about
04:11
the individual parts of the system, how complex they are.
04:13
So if it's a cell or a termite or a bird,
04:19
you just focus on the rules of interaction.
04:24
As a result, networks are ideal representations
04:28
of complex systems.
04:33
The nodes in the network
04:35
are the system's components
04:38
and the links are given by the interactions.
04:41
So what equations are for physics,
04:45
complex networks are for the study of complex systems.
04:48
This approach has been very successfully applied
04:52
to many complex systems in physics, biology,
04:56
computer science, the social sciences,
04:59
but what about economics?
05:02
Where are economic networks?
05:04
This is a surprising and prominent gap in the literature.
05:07
The study we published last year called
05:11
"The Network of Global Corporate Control"
05:14
was the first extensive analysis of economic networks.
05:17
The study went viral on the Internet
05:23
and it attracted a lot of attention from the international media.
05:26
This is quite remarkable, because, again,
05:31
why did no one look at this before?
05:34
Similar data has been around for quite some time.
05:35
What we looked at in detail was ownership networks.
05:38
So here the nodes are companies, people, governments,
05:42
foundations, etc.
05:47
And the links represent the shareholding relations,
05:51
so Shareholder A has x percent of the shares in Company B.
05:54
And we also assign a value to the company
05:59
given by the operating revenue.
06:01
So ownership networks reveal the patterns
06:04
of shareholding relations.
06:07
In this little example, you can see
06:10
a few financial institutions
06:12
with some of the many links highlighted.
06:14
Now you may think that no one's looked at this before
06:19
because ownership networks are
06:21
really, really boring to study.
06:24
Well, as ownership is related to control,
06:27
as I shall explain later,
06:31
looking at ownership networks
06:32
actually can give you answers to questions like,
06:34
who are the key players?
06:36
How are they organized? Are they isolated?
06:38
Are they interconnected?
06:40
And what is the overall distribution of control?
06:42
In other words, who controls the world?
06:46
I think this is an interesting question.
06:49
And it has implications for systemic risk.
06:51
This is a measure of how vulnerable a system is overall.
06:56
A high degree of interconnectivity
07:01
can be bad for stability,
07:03
because then the stress can spread through the system
07:06
like an epidemic.
07:10
Scientists have sometimes criticized economists
07:13
who believe ideas and concepts
07:15
are more important than empirical data,
07:18
because a foundational guideline in science is:
07:21
Let the data speak. Okay. Let's do that.
07:24
So we started with a database containing
07:27
13 million ownership relations from 2007.
07:30
This is a lot of data, and because we wanted to find out
07:34
who rules the world,
07:37
we decided to focus on transnational corporations,
07:39
or TNCs for short.
07:43
These are companies that operate in more than one country,
07:45
and we found 43,000.
07:48
In the next step, we built the network around these companies,
07:51
so we took all the TNCs' shareholders,
07:55
and the shareholders' shareholders, etc.,
07:57
all the way upstream, and we did the same downstream,
07:59
and ended up with a network containing 600,000 nodes
08:02
and one million links.
08:06
This is the TNC network which we analyzed.
08:08
And it turns out to be structured as follows.
08:12
So you have a periphery and a center
08:14
which contains about 75 percent of all the players,
08:17
and in the center there's this tiny but dominant core
08:21
which is made up of highly interconnected companies.
08:25
To give you a better picture,
08:30
think about a metropolitan area.
08:32
So you have the suburbs and the periphery,
08:34
you have a center like a financial district,
08:36
then the core will be something like
08:39
the tallest high rise building in the center.
08:40
And we already see signs of organization going on here.
08:44
Thirty-six percent of the TNCs are in the core only,
08:49
but they make up 95 percent of the total operating revenue
08:54
of all TNCs.
08:59
Okay, so now we analyzed the structure,
09:01
so how does this relate to the control?
09:04
Well, ownership gives voting rights to shareholders.
09:08
This is the normal notion of control.
09:12
And there are different models which allow you to compute
09:14
the control you get from ownership.
09:18
If you have more than 50 percent of the shares in a company,
09:20
you get control,
09:23
but usually it depends on the relative distribution of shares.
09:25
And the network really matters.
09:30
About 10 years ago, Mr. Tronchetti Provera
09:33
had ownership and control in a small company,
09:36
which had ownership and control in a bigger company.
09:39
You get the idea.
09:42
This ended up giving him control in Telecom Italia
09:44
with a leverage of 26.
09:47
So this means that, with each euro he invested,
09:51
he was able to move 26 euros of market value
09:55
through the chain of ownership relations.
09:58
Now what we actually computed in our study
10:02
was the control over the TNCs' value.
10:05
This allowed us to assign a degree of influence
10:09
to each shareholder.
10:11
This is very much in the sense of
10:14
Max Weber's idea of potential power,
10:16
which is the probability of imposing one's own will
10:19
despite the opposition of others.
10:23
If you want to compute the flow in an ownership network,
10:27
this is what you have to do.
10:32
It's actually not that hard to understand.
10:33
Let me explain by giving you this analogy.
10:36
So think about water flowing in pipes
10:38
where the pipes have different thickness.
10:41
So similarly, the control is flowing in the ownership networks
10:44
and is accumulating at the nodes.
10:49
So what did we find after computing all this network control?
10:54
Well, it turns out that the 737 top shareholders
10:58
have the potential to collectively control
11:03
80 percent of the TNCs' value.
11:06
Now remember, we started out with 600,000 nodes,
11:10
so these 737 top players
11:13
make up a bit more than 0.1 percent.
11:17
They're mostly financial institutions in the U.S. and the U.K.
11:21
And it gets even more extreme.
11:26
There are 146 top players in the core,
11:28
and they together have the potential to collectively control
11:33
40 percent of the TNCs' value.
11:37
What should you take home from all of this?
11:42
Well, the high degree of control you saw
11:45
is very extreme by any standard.
11:49
The high degree of interconnectivity
11:54
of the top players in the core
11:56
could pose a significant systemic risk to the global economy
11:58
and we could easily reproduce the TNC network
12:04
with a few simple rules.
12:07
This means that its structure is probably the result
12:09
of self-organization.
12:12
It's an emergent property which depends
12:13
on the rules of interaction in the system,
12:17
so it's probably not the result of a top-down approach
12:20
like a global conspiracy.
12:23
Our study "is an impression of the moon's surface.
12:26
It's not a street map."
12:29
So you should take the exact numbers in our study
12:31
with a grain of salt,
12:33
yet it "gave us a tantalizing glimpse
12:35
of a brave new world of finance."
12:38
We hope to have opened the door for more such research in this direction,
12:42
so the remaining unknown terrain will be charted in the future.
12:47
And this is slowly starting.
12:52
We're seeing the emergence of long-term
12:53
and highly-funded programs which aim at understanding
12:56
our networked world from a complexity point of view.
13:00
But this journey has only just begun,
13:04
so we will have to wait before we see the first results.
13:06
Now there is still a big problem, in my opinion.
13:12
Ideas relating to finance, economics, politics,
13:15
society, are very often tainted
13:21
by people's personal ideologies.
13:24
I really hope that this complexity perspective
13:28
allows for some common ground to be found.
13:32
It would be really great if it has the power
13:37
to help end the gridlock created by conflicting ideas,
13:40
which appears to be paralyzing our globalized world.
13:45
Reality is so complex, we need to move away from dogma.
13:50
But this is just my own personal ideology.
13:55
Thank you.
13:58
(Applause)
14:00
Translator:Joseph Geni
Reviewer:Morton Bast

sponsored links

James B. Glattfelder - Complex systems theorist
James B. Glattfelder aims to give us a richer, data-driven understanding of the people and interactions that control our global economy. He does this not to push an ideology -- but with the hopes of making the world a better place.

Why you should listen

First a physicist and then a researcher at a Swiss hedge fund, James B. Glattfelder found himself amazed by the level of understanding we have in regards to the physical world and universe around us. He wondered: how can we move toward a similar understanding of human society?

This question led him to the study of complex systems, a subject he now holds a Ph.D in from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. Glattfelder is co-head of quantitative research at Olsen Ltd in Zurich, an FX investment manager focusing on market-stabilizing algorithms. In 2011, he co-authored the study “The Network of Global Corporate Control,” which went viral in the international media and sparked many controversial discussions. The study looked at the architecture of ownership across the globe, and computed a level of control exerted by each international player. The study revealed that less than 1% of all the players in the global economy are part of a highly interconnected and powerful core which, because of the high levels of overlap, leaves the economy vulnerable.

In his free time, Glattfelder enjoys snowboarding, rock climbing, surfing and listening to electronic music. 

The original video is available on TED.com
sponsored links

If you need translations, you can install "Google Translate" extension into your Chrome Browser.
Furthermore, you can change playback rate by installing "Video Speed Controller" extension.

Data provided by TED.

This website is owned and operated by Tokyo English Network.
The developer's blog is here.