ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Maria Bezaitis - Computer engineer
A principal engineer at Intel, Maria Bezaitis focuses on how constellations of personal data can form new business models.

Why you should listen

Maria Bezaitis examines the social and cultural landscape, charting new directions for technology innovation within it. At Intel, her work focuses on personal data and how it develops relationally – and what this will mean in terms of new business models, the development of new devices and interfaces, and the creation of better security technologies.

Maria joined Intel in June 2006 to direct the People and Practices Research Group. She also played a leadership role at the cutting-edge social research and design organizations, E-Lab and Sapient Corporation. A longtime literature student, Bezaitis finished her Ph.D at Duke University in French Literature.

More profile about the speaker
Maria Bezaitis | Speaker | TED.com
TED@Intel

Maria Bezaitis: Why we need strangeness

Filmed:
1,213,949 views

In our digital world, social relations have become mediated by data. Without even realizing it, we're barricading ourselves against strangeness -- people and ideas that don't fit the patterns of who we already know, what we already like and where we've already been. Maria Bezaitis makes a bold call for technology to deliver us to what and who we need, even if it's unfamiliar and strange.
- Computer engineer
A principal engineer at Intel, Maria Bezaitis focuses on how constellations of personal data can form new business models. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:12
"Don't talk to strangers."
0
892
3288
00:16
You have heard that phrase uttered
1
4180
2039
00:18
by your friends, family, schools and the media for decades.
2
6219
4313
00:22
It's a norm. It's a social norm.
3
10532
2912
00:25
But it's a special kind of social norm,
4
13444
2358
00:27
because it's a social norm that wants to tell us
5
15802
2530
00:30
who we can relate to and who we shouldn't relate to.
6
18332
4464
00:34
"Don't talk to strangers" says,
7
22796
2504
00:37
"Stay from anyone who's not familiar to you.
8
25300
4176
00:41
Stick with the people you know.
9
29476
2415
00:43
Stick with people like you."
10
31891
2974
00:46
How appealing is that?
11
34865
2352
00:49
It's not really what we do, is it, when we're at our best?
12
37217
3225
00:52
When we're at our best, we reach out to people
13
40442
2784
00:55
who are not like us,
14
43226
1618
00:56
because when we do that, we learn from people
15
44844
2867
00:59
who are not like us.
16
47711
2269
01:01
My phrase for this value of being with "not like us"
17
49980
4101
01:06
is "strangeness,"
18
54081
1872
01:07
and my point is that in today's digitally intensive world,
19
55953
3900
01:11
strangers are quite frankly not the point.
20
59853
3366
01:15
The point that we should be worried about is,
21
63219
2183
01:17
how much strangeness are we getting?
22
65402
2887
01:20
Why strangeness? Because our social relations
23
68289
3006
01:23
are increasingly mediated by data,
24
71295
2794
01:26
and data turns our social relations into digital relations,
25
74089
4557
01:30
and that means that our digital relations
26
78646
2349
01:32
now depend extraordinarily on technology
27
80995
3802
01:36
to bring to them a sense of robustness,
28
84797
2918
01:39
a sense of discovery,
29
87715
1587
01:41
a sense of surprise and unpredictability.
30
89302
3270
01:44
Why not strangers?
31
92572
1767
01:46
Because strangers are part of a world
32
94339
2294
01:48
of really rigid boundaries.
33
96633
2265
01:50
They belong to a world of people I know
34
98898
2952
01:53
versus people I don't know,
35
101850
2514
01:56
and in the context of my digital relations,
36
104364
2479
01:58
I'm already doing things with people I don't know.
37
106843
4021
02:02
The question isn't whether or not I know you.
38
110864
3218
02:06
The question is, what can I do with you?
39
114082
2504
02:08
What can I learn with you?
40
116586
2609
02:11
What can we do together that benefits us both?
41
119195
4301
02:15
I spend a lot of time thinking about
42
123496
2362
02:17
how the social landscape is changing,
43
125858
2760
02:20
how new technologies create new constraints
44
128618
2472
02:23
and new opportunities for people.
45
131090
2790
02:25
The most important changes facing us today
46
133880
2651
02:28
have to do with data and what data is doing
47
136531
2806
02:31
to shape the kinds of digital relations
48
139337
2105
02:33
that will be possible for us in the future.
49
141442
2464
02:35
The economies of the future depend on that.
50
143906
2233
02:38
Our social lives in the future depend on that.
51
146139
2919
02:41
The threat to worry about isn't strangers.
52
149058
3032
02:44
The threat to worry about is whether or not
53
152090
2112
02:46
we're getting our fair share of strangeness.
54
154202
2992
02:49
Now, 20th-century psychologists and sociologists
55
157194
2592
02:51
were thinking about strangers,
56
159786
2153
02:53
but they weren't thinking so dynamically about human relations,
57
161939
2737
02:56
and they were thinking about strangers
58
164676
1369
02:58
in the context of influencing practices.
59
166045
2954
03:00
Stanley Milgram from the '60s and '70s,
60
168999
2748
03:03
the creator of the small-world experiments,
61
171747
1986
03:05
which became later popularized as six degrees of separation,
62
173733
2954
03:08
made the point that any two arbitrarily selected people
63
176687
3512
03:12
were likely connected from between five to seven intermediary steps.
64
180199
3722
03:15
His point was that strangers are out there.
65
183921
3030
03:18
We can reach them. There are paths
66
186951
1572
03:20
that enable us to reach them.
67
188523
2686
03:23
Mark Granovetter, Stanford sociologist, in 1973
68
191209
3769
03:26
in his seminal essay "The Strength of Weak Ties,"
69
194978
2798
03:29
made the point that these weak ties
70
197776
2826
03:32
that are a part of our networks, these strangers,
71
200602
2487
03:35
are actually more effective at diffusing information to us
72
203089
2992
03:38
than are our strong ties, the people closest to us.
73
206081
4536
03:42
He makes an additional indictment of our strong ties
74
210617
3497
03:46
when he says that these people who are so close to us,
75
214114
2629
03:48
these strong ties in our lives,
76
216743
1933
03:50
actually have a homogenizing effect on us.
77
218676
3427
03:54
They produce sameness.
78
222103
2835
03:56
My colleagues and I at Intel have spent the last few years
79
224938
2839
03:59
looking at the ways in which digital platforms
80
227777
2616
04:02
are reshaping our everyday lives,
81
230393
1871
04:04
what kinds of new routines are possible.
82
232264
2617
04:06
We've been looking specifically at the kinds
83
234881
1296
04:08
of digital platforms that have enabled us
84
236177
2711
04:10
to take our possessions, those things that used to be
85
238888
3135
04:14
very restricted to us and to our friends in our houses,
86
242023
3122
04:17
and to make them available to people we don't know.
87
245145
3822
04:20
Whether it's our clothes, whether it's our cars,
88
248967
2723
04:23
whether it's our bikes, whether it's our books or music,
89
251690
2623
04:26
we are able to take our possessions now
90
254313
2993
04:29
and make them available to people we've never met.
91
257306
3431
04:32
And we concluded a very important insight,
92
260737
2811
04:35
which was that as people's relationships
93
263548
1788
04:37
to the things in their lives change,
94
265336
2541
04:39
so do their relations with other people.
95
267877
3444
04:43
And yet recommendation system
96
271321
1408
04:44
after recommendation system continues to miss the boat.
97
272729
4275
04:49
It continues to try to predict what I need
98
277004
2549
04:51
based on some past characterization of who I am,
99
279553
3240
04:54
of what I've already done.
100
282793
2296
04:57
Security technology after security technology
101
285089
2504
04:59
continues to design data protection
102
287593
2176
05:01
in terms of threats and attacks,
103
289769
2405
05:04
keeping me locked into really rigid kinds of relations.
104
292174
3595
05:07
Categories like "friends" and "family"
105
295769
2496
05:10
and "contacts" and "colleagues"
106
298265
2477
05:12
don't tell me anything about my actual relations.
107
300742
3787
05:16
A more effective way to think about my relations
108
304529
2244
05:18
might be in terms of closeness and distance,
109
306773
2692
05:21
where at any given point in time, with any single person,
110
309465
3820
05:25
I am both close and distant from that individual,
111
313285
3491
05:28
all as a function of what I need to do right now.
112
316776
4508
05:33
People aren't close or distant.
113
321284
2638
05:35
People are always a combination of the two,
114
323922
3061
05:38
and that combination is constantly changing.
115
326983
3720
05:42
What if technologies could intervene
116
330703
2440
05:45
to disrupt the balance of certain kinds of relationships?
117
333143
3977
05:49
What if technologies could intervene
118
337120
1961
05:51
to help me find the person that I need right now?
119
339081
4411
05:55
Strangeness is that calibration
120
343492
2424
05:57
of closeness and distance
121
345916
2219
06:00
that enables me to find the people that I need right now,
122
348135
3903
06:04
that enables me to find the sources of intimacy,
123
352038
2990
06:07
of discovery, and of inspiration that I need right now.
124
355028
4648
06:11
Strangeness is not about meeting strangers.
125
359676
2309
06:13
It simply makes the point that we need
126
361985
2195
06:16
to disrupt our zones of familiarity.
127
364180
3282
06:19
So jogging those zones of familiarity is one way to think about strangeness,
128
367462
3657
06:23
and it's a problem faced not just by individuals today,
129
371119
2704
06:25
but also by organizations,
130
373823
2230
06:28
organizations that are trying to embrace massively new opportunities.
131
376053
4523
06:32
Whether you're a political party
132
380576
2106
06:34
insisting to your detriment on a very rigid notion
133
382682
2868
06:37
of who belongs and who does not,
134
385550
2388
06:39
whether you're the government
135
387938
1493
06:41
protecting social institutions like marriage
136
389431
2698
06:44
and restricting access of those institutions to the few,
137
392129
3893
06:48
whether you're a teenager in her bedroom
138
396022
2408
06:50
who's trying to jostle her relations with her parents,
139
398430
3188
06:53
strangeness is a way to think about how we pave the way
140
401618
3162
06:56
to new kinds of relations.
141
404780
2474
06:59
We have to change the norms.
142
407254
3358
07:02
We have to change the norms in order to enable
143
410612
3030
07:05
new kinds of technologies
144
413642
1938
07:07
as a basis for new kinds of businesses.
145
415580
2789
07:10
What interesting questions lie ahead for us
146
418369
3733
07:14
in this world of no strangers?
147
422102
2671
07:16
How might we think differently about our relations with people?
148
424773
3806
07:20
How might we think differently about our relations
149
428579
3121
07:23
with distributed groups of people?
150
431700
2092
07:25
How might we think differently about our relations with technologies,
151
433792
4441
07:30
things that effectively become social participants
152
438233
3006
07:33
in their own right?
153
441239
2074
07:35
The range of digital relations is extraordinary.
154
443313
3813
07:39
In the context of this broad range of digital relations,
155
447126
4557
07:43
safely seeking strangeness might very well be
156
451683
2974
07:46
a new basis for that innovation.
157
454657
2271
07:48
Thank you.
158
456928
1470
07:50
(Applause)
159
458398
4893
Translated by Joseph Geni
Reviewed by Morton Bast

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Maria Bezaitis - Computer engineer
A principal engineer at Intel, Maria Bezaitis focuses on how constellations of personal data can form new business models.

Why you should listen

Maria Bezaitis examines the social and cultural landscape, charting new directions for technology innovation within it. At Intel, her work focuses on personal data and how it develops relationally – and what this will mean in terms of new business models, the development of new devices and interfaces, and the creation of better security technologies.

Maria joined Intel in June 2006 to direct the People and Practices Research Group. She also played a leadership role at the cutting-edge social research and design organizations, E-Lab and Sapient Corporation. A longtime literature student, Bezaitis finished her Ph.D at Duke University in French Literature.

More profile about the speaker
Maria Bezaitis | Speaker | TED.com