ABOUT THE SPEAKER
David Puttnam - Producer
After a much-awarded career as a film producer, Lord David Puttnam now works at the intersection of education, media and policy.

Why you should listen

David Puttnam spent thirty years as an independent producer of award-winning films, including The Mission, The Killing Fields, Local Hero, Chariots of Fire, Midnight Express, Bugsy Malone and Memphis Belle. His films have won ten Oscars, 25 Baftas and the Palme D'Or at Cannes.  

He retired from film production in 1998 to focus on his work in public policy as it relates to education, the environment, and the creative and communications industries. In 1998 he founded the National Teaching Awards, which he chaired until 2008, also serving as the first Chair of the General Teaching Council from 2000 to 2002. From July 2002 to July 2009 he was president of UNICEF UK, playing a key role in promoting UNICEF’s advocacy and awareness objectives.

 

More profile about the speaker
David Puttnam | Speaker | TED.com
TEDxHousesOfParliament

David Puttnam: Does the media have a "duty of care"?

Filmed:
935,362 views

In this thoughtful talk, David Puttnam asks a big question about the media: Does it have a moral imperative to create informed citizens, to support democracy? His solution for ensuring media responsibility is bold, and you might not agree. But it's certainly a question worth asking.
- Producer
After a much-awarded career as a film producer, Lord David Puttnam now works at the intersection of education, media and policy. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:12
I'd like to start, if I may,
0
872
1544
00:14
with the story of the Paisley snail.
1
2416
2724
00:17
On the evening of the 26th of August, 1928,
2
5140
3215
00:20
May Donoghue took a train from Glasgow
3
8355
2374
00:22
to the town of Paisley, seven miles east of the city,
4
10729
2531
00:25
and there at the Wellmeadow Café,
5
13260
2313
00:27
she had a Scots ice cream float,
6
15573
3126
00:30
a mix of ice cream and ginger beer
7
18699
1847
00:32
bought for her by a friend.
8
20546
1955
00:34
The ginger beer came in a brown, opaque bottle
9
22501
2401
00:36
labeled "D. Stevenson, Glen Lane, Paisley."
10
24902
3863
00:40
She drank some of the ice cream float,
11
28765
2076
00:42
but as the remaining ginger beer was poured
12
30841
1834
00:44
into her tumbler,
13
32675
1396
00:46
a decomposed snail
14
34071
2453
00:48
floated to the surface of her glass.
15
36524
2582
00:51
Three days later, she was admitted
16
39106
1544
00:52
to the Glasgow Royal Infirmary
17
40650
1506
00:54
and diagnosed with severe gastroenteritis
18
42156
2058
00:56
and shock.
19
44214
1953
00:58
The case of Donoghue vs. Stevenson that followed
20
46167
3268
01:01
set a very important legal precedent:
21
49435
2645
01:04
Stevenson, the manufacturer of the ginger beer,
22
52080
1731
01:05
was held to have a clear duty of care
23
53811
2777
01:08
towards May Donoghue,
24
56588
1448
01:10
even though there was no contract between them,
25
58036
2102
01:12
and, indeed, she hadn't even bought the drink.
26
60138
2817
01:14
One of the judges, Lord Atkin, described it like this:
27
62955
3019
01:17
You must take care to avoid acts or omissions
28
65974
2910
01:20
which you can reasonably foresee
29
68884
2068
01:22
would be likely to injure your neighbor.
30
70952
3228
01:26
Indeed, one wonders that without a duty of care,
31
74180
2343
01:28
how many people would have had to suffer
32
76523
1746
01:30
from gastroenteritis before Stevenson
eventually went out of business.
33
78269
3724
01:33
Now please hang on to that Paisley snail story,
34
81993
2381
01:36
because it's an important principle.
35
84374
3233
01:39
Last year, the Hansard Society,
a nonpartisan charity
36
87607
2494
01:42
which seeks to strengthen parliamentary democracy
37
90101
1906
01:44
and encourage greater public involvement in politics
38
92007
3237
01:47
published, alongside their annual audit
39
95244
2587
01:49
of political engagement, an additional section
40
97831
2873
01:52
devoted entirely to politics and the media.
41
100704
3123
01:55
Here are a couple of rather depressing observations
42
103827
2375
01:58
from that survey.
43
106202
2008
02:00
Tabloid newspapers do not appear
44
108210
2165
02:02
to advance the political citizenship of their readers,
45
110375
2833
02:05
relative even to those
46
113208
1573
02:06
who read no newspapers whatsoever.
47
114781
3226
02:10
Tabloid-only readers are twice as likely to agree
48
118007
2992
02:12
with a negative view of politics
49
120999
1851
02:14
than readers of no newspapers.
50
122850
2575
02:17
They're not just less politically engaged.
51
125425
1993
02:19
They are consuming media that reinforces
52
127418
2448
02:21
their negative evaluation of politics,
53
129866
1962
02:23
thereby contributing to a fatalistic and cynical
54
131828
3103
02:26
attitude to democracy and their own role within it.
55
134931
3335
02:30
Little wonder that the report concluded that
56
138266
2160
02:32
in this respect, the press, particularly the tabloids,
57
140426
3190
02:35
appear not to be living up to the importance
58
143616
2339
02:37
of their role in our democracy.
59
145955
2636
02:40
Now I doubt if anyone in this room would seriously
60
148591
2059
02:42
challenge that view.
61
150650
1447
02:44
But if Hansard are right, and they usually are,
62
152097
2616
02:46
then we've got a very serious problem on our hands,
63
154713
1976
02:48
and it's one that I'd like to spend the next 10 minutes
64
156689
2635
02:51
focusing upon.
65
159324
2029
02:53
Since the Paisley snail,
66
161353
1683
02:55
and especially over the past decade or so,
67
163036
2464
02:57
a great deal of thinking has been developed
68
165500
1919
02:59
around the notion of a duty of care
69
167419
1859
03:01
as it relates to a number of aspects of civil society.
70
169278
2539
03:03
Generally a duty of care arises when one individual
71
171817
2744
03:06
or a group of individuals undertakes an activity
72
174561
2734
03:09
which has the potential to cause harm to another,
73
177295
2530
03:11
either physically, mentally or economically.
74
179825
2714
03:14
This is principally focused on obvious areas,
75
182539
2471
03:17
such as our empathetic response
to children and young people,
76
185010
3042
03:20
to our service personnel, and
to the elderly and infirm.
77
188052
2726
03:22
It is seldom, if ever, extended
to equally important arguments
78
190778
4193
03:26
around the fragility of our
present system of government,
79
194971
4250
03:31
to the notion that honesty, accuracy and impartiality
80
199221
3509
03:34
are fundamental to the process of building
81
202730
2144
03:36
and embedding an informed,
82
204874
1729
03:38
participatory democracy.
83
206603
2757
03:41
And the more you think about it,
84
209360
1421
03:42
the stranger that is.
85
210781
1831
03:44
A couple of years ago, I had the pleasure
86
212612
1462
03:46
of opening a brand new school
87
214074
1754
03:47
in the northeast of England.
88
215828
1571
03:49
It had been renamed by its pupils as Academy 360.
89
217399
3539
03:52
As I walked through their impressive,
90
220938
1852
03:54
glass-covered atrium,
91
222790
1375
03:56
in front of me, emblazoned on the wall
92
224165
1818
03:57
in letters of fire
93
225983
1548
03:59
was Marcus Aurelius's famous injunction:
94
227531
3101
04:02
If it's not true, don't say it;
95
230632
2855
04:05
if it's not right, don't do it.
96
233487
3083
04:08
The head teacher saw me staring at it,
97
236570
1988
04:10
and he said, "Oh, that's our school motto."
98
238558
2792
04:13
On the train back to London,
99
241350
1727
04:15
I couldn't get it out of my mind.
100
243077
1854
04:16
I kept thinking, can it really have taken us
101
244931
2559
04:19
over 2,000 years to come to terms
102
247490
2211
04:21
with that simple notion
103
249701
1865
04:23
as being our minimum expectation of each other?
104
251566
2952
04:26
Isn't it time that we develop this concept
105
254518
2608
04:29
of a duty of care
106
257126
1669
04:30
and extended it to include a care
107
258795
2426
04:33
for our shared but increasingly
endangered democratic values?
108
261221
3264
04:36
After all, the absence of a duty of care
109
264485
1857
04:38
within many professions
110
266342
1590
04:39
can all too easily amount to
accusations of negligence,
111
267932
2503
04:42
and that being the case, can we be
really comfortable with the thought
112
270435
3107
04:45
that we're in effect being negligent
113
273542
2301
04:47
in respect of the health of our own societies
114
275843
2791
04:50
and the values that necessarily underpin them?
115
278634
2735
04:53
Could anyone honestly suggest, on the evidence,
116
281369
2995
04:56
that the same media which
Hansard so roundly condemned
117
284364
3256
04:59
have taken sufficient care to avoid behaving
118
287620
3287
05:02
in ways which they could reasonably have foreseen
119
290907
3442
05:06
would be likely to undermine or even damage
120
294349
2101
05:08
our inherently fragile democratic settlement.
121
296450
2834
05:11
Now there will be those who will argue
122
299284
2021
05:13
that this could all too easily drift into a form
123
301305
1773
05:15
of censorship, albeit self-censorship,
124
303078
2007
05:17
but I don't buy that argument.
125
305085
1956
05:19
It has to be possible
126
307041
2059
05:21
to balance freedom of expression
127
309100
2100
05:23
with wider moral and social responsibilities.
128
311200
3207
05:26
Let me explain why by taking the example
129
314407
1851
05:28
from my own career as a filmmaker.
130
316258
2903
05:31
Throughout that career, I never accepted
131
319161
1807
05:32
that a filmmaker should set about putting
132
320968
1627
05:34
their own work outside or above what he or she
133
322595
3050
05:37
believed to be a decent set of values
134
325645
1950
05:39
for their own life, their own family,
135
327595
3349
05:42
and the future of the society in which we all live.
136
330944
3591
05:46
I'd go further.
137
334535
1324
05:47
A responsible filmmaker should
never devalue their work
138
335859
3294
05:51
to a point at which it becomes less than true
139
339153
2044
05:53
to the world they themselves wish to inhabit.
140
341197
3440
05:56
As I see it, filmmakers, journalists, even bloggers
141
344637
3386
06:00
are all required to face up to the social expectations
142
348023
2524
06:02
that come with combining the
intrinsic power of their medium
143
350547
3755
06:06
with their well-honed professional skills.
144
354302
3374
06:09
Obviously this is not a mandated duty,
145
357676
2887
06:12
but for the gifted filmmaker
and the responsible journalist
146
360563
2482
06:15
or even blogger, it strikes me
as being utterly inescapable.
147
363045
3809
06:18
We should always remember that our notion
148
366865
2599
06:21
of individual freedom and
its partner, creative freedom,
149
369464
2891
06:24
is comparatively new
150
372355
1795
06:26
in the history of Western ideas,
151
374150
2262
06:28
and for that reason, it's often undervalued
152
376412
1918
06:30
and can be very quickly undermined.
153
378330
2363
06:32
It's a prize easily lost,
154
380693
2227
06:34
and once lost, once surrendered,
155
382920
1763
06:36
it can prove very, very hard to reclaim.
156
384683
3317
06:40
And its first line of defense
157
388000
1525
06:41
has to be our own standards,
158
389525
2351
06:43
not those enforced on us by a censor or legislation,
159
391876
3739
06:47
our own standards and our own integrity.
160
395615
1823
06:49
Our integrity as we deal with those
161
397438
1994
06:51
with whom we work
162
399432
1548
06:52
and our own standards as we operate within society.
163
400980
3625
06:56
And these standards of ours
164
404605
1470
06:58
need to be all of a piece with
a sustainable social agenda.
165
406075
3265
07:01
They're part of a collective responsibility,
166
409340
2113
07:03
the responsibility of the artist or the journalist
167
411453
2130
07:05
to deal with the world as it really is,
168
413583
2374
07:07
and this, in turn, must go hand in hand
169
415957
2449
07:10
with the responsibility of those governing society
170
418406
2418
07:12
to also face up to that world,
171
420824
2077
07:14
and not to be tempted to misappropriate
172
422901
2360
07:17
the causes of its ills.
173
425276
2577
07:19
Yet, as has become strikingly clear
174
427853
2646
07:22
over the last couple of years,
175
430499
2068
07:24
such responsibility has to a very great extent
176
432567
2034
07:26
been abrogated by large sections of the media.
177
434601
3043
07:29
And as a consequence, across the Western world,
178
437644
1940
07:31
the over-simplistic policies of the parties of protest
179
439584
3299
07:34
and their appeal to a largely disillusioned,
180
442883
2385
07:37
older demographic,
181
445268
1389
07:38
along with the apathy and obsession with the trivial
182
446657
2208
07:40
that typifies at least some of the young,
183
448865
1898
07:42
taken together, these and other similarly
184
450763
2058
07:44
contemporary aberrations
185
452821
2081
07:46
are threatening to squeeze the life
186
454902
2047
07:48
out of active, informed debate and engagement,
187
456949
3574
07:52
and I stress active.
188
460523
2527
07:55
The most ardent of libertarians might argue
189
463050
2277
07:57
that Donoghue v. Stevenson should
have been thrown out of court
190
465327
2994
08:00
and that Stevenson would eventually
have gone out of business
191
468321
2118
08:02
if he'd continued to sell ginger beer with snails in it.
192
470439
3417
08:05
But most of us, I think, accept some small role
193
473856
3414
08:09
for the state to enforce a duty of care,
194
477270
3078
08:12
and the key word here is reasonable.
195
480348
2672
08:15
Judges must ask, did they take reasonable care
196
483020
3580
08:18
and could they have reasonably foreseen
197
486600
1415
08:20
the consequences of their actions?
198
488015
2198
08:22
Far from signifying overbearing state power,
199
490213
2982
08:25
it's that small common sense test of reasonableness
200
493195
3525
08:28
that I'd like us to apply to those in the media
201
496720
2659
08:31
who, after all, set the tone and the content
202
499379
2271
08:33
for much of our democratic discourse.
203
501650
3317
08:36
Democracy, in order to work, requires that
204
504967
2720
08:39
reasonable men and women take
the time to understand and debate
205
507687
2948
08:42
difficult, sometimes complex issues,
206
510635
2332
08:44
and they do so in an atmosphere which strives
207
512967
2293
08:47
for the type of understanding that leads to,
208
515260
2399
08:49
if not agreement, then at least a productive
209
517659
2067
08:51
and workable compromise.
210
519726
2367
08:54
Politics is about choices,
211
522093
2357
08:56
and within those choices, politics is about priorities.
212
524450
3991
09:00
It's about reconciling conflicting preferences
213
528441
2538
09:02
wherever and whenever possibly based on fact.
214
530979
5216
09:08
But if the facts themselves are distorted,
215
536195
2471
09:10
the resolutions are likely only
to create further conflict,
216
538666
3723
09:14
with all the stresses and strains on society
217
542389
1887
09:16
that inevitably follow.
218
544276
2216
09:18
The media have to decide:
219
546492
1947
09:20
Do they see their role as being to inflame
220
548439
3174
09:23
or to inform?
221
551613
2330
09:25
Because in the end, it comes down to a combination
222
553943
2862
09:28
of trust and leadership.
223
556805
2491
09:31
Fifty years ago this week,
President John F. Kennedy
224
559296
2577
09:33
made two epoch-making speeches,
225
561873
1606
09:35
the first on disarmament
and the second on civil rights.
226
563479
3497
09:38
The first led almost immediately
227
566976
2102
09:41
to the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty,
228
569078
1581
09:42
and the second led to the 1964 Civil Rights Act,
229
570659
3065
09:45
both of which represented giant leaps forward.
230
573724
3586
09:49
Democracy, well-led and well-informed,
231
577310
2405
09:51
can achieve very great things,
232
579715
2493
09:54
but there's a precondition.
233
582208
1673
09:55
We have to trust that those making those decisions
234
583881
3311
09:59
are acting in the best interest not of themselves
235
587192
2467
10:01
but of the whole of the people.
236
589659
1764
10:03
We need factually-based options,
237
591423
3079
10:06
clearly laid out,
238
594502
1239
10:07
not those of a few powerful
239
595741
1398
10:09
and potentially manipulative corporations
240
597139
2097
10:11
pursuing their own frequently narrow agendas,
241
599236
2367
10:13
but accurate, unprejudiced information
242
601603
2429
10:16
with which to make our own judgments.
243
604032
2376
10:18
If we want to provide decent, fulfilling lives
244
606408
1894
10:20
for our children and our children's children,
245
608302
2311
10:22
we need to exercise to the
very greatest degree possible
246
610613
3117
10:25
that duty of care for a vibrant,
247
613730
1712
10:27
and hopefully a lasting, democracy.
248
615442
2897
10:30
Thank you very much for listening to me.
249
618339
2083
10:32
(Applause)
250
620422
3939

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
David Puttnam - Producer
After a much-awarded career as a film producer, Lord David Puttnam now works at the intersection of education, media and policy.

Why you should listen

David Puttnam spent thirty years as an independent producer of award-winning films, including The Mission, The Killing Fields, Local Hero, Chariots of Fire, Midnight Express, Bugsy Malone and Memphis Belle. His films have won ten Oscars, 25 Baftas and the Palme D'Or at Cannes.  

He retired from film production in 1998 to focus on his work in public policy as it relates to education, the environment, and the creative and communications industries. In 1998 he founded the National Teaching Awards, which he chaired until 2008, also serving as the first Chair of the General Teaching Council from 2000 to 2002. From July 2002 to July 2009 he was president of UNICEF UK, playing a key role in promoting UNICEF’s advocacy and awareness objectives.

 

More profile about the speaker
David Puttnam | Speaker | TED.com