ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Dambisa Moyo - Global economist
Dambisa Moyo is an international economist who analyzes the macroeconomy and global affairs.

Why you should listen

Dambisa Moyo's work examines the interplay between rapidly developing countries, international business, and the global economy -- while highlighting opportunities for investment. She has travelled to more than 60 countries over the past decade, studying the political, economic and financial workings of emerging economies, in particular the BRICs and the frontier economies in Asia, South America, Africa and the Middle East. Her latest book, Winner Take All: China’s Race for Resources and What It Means for the World, looks at how commodities markets influence much more than the global economy -- and examines the possible consequences of China's unprecedented rush for commodities such as oil, minerals, water, and food, including the looming specter of commodity-driven conflict.

She is the author of the brilliantly argued Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa and How the West Was Lost: Fifty Years of Economic Folly and the Stark Choices Ahead. Previously, she was an economist at Goldman Sachs, where she worked for nearly a decade, and was a consultant to the World Bank in Washington.

More profile about the speaker
Dambisa Moyo | Speaker | TED.com
TEDGlobal>Geneva

Dambisa Moyo: Economic growth has stalled. Let's fix it

Filmed:
1,586,996 views

Economic growth is the defining challenge of our time; without it, political and social instability rises, human progress stagnates and societies grow dimmer. But, says economist Dambisa Moyo, dogmatic capitalism isn't creating the growth we need. As she shows, in both state-sponsored and market-driven models, capitalism is failing to solve social ills, fostering corruption and creating income inequality. Moyo surveys the current economic landscape and suggests that we have to start thinking about capitalism as a spectrum so we can blend the best of different models together to foster growth.
- Global economist
Dambisa Moyo is an international economist who analyzes the macroeconomy and global affairs. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:13
Our ability to create
and sustain economic growth
0
1359
5097
00:18
is the defining challenge of our time.
1
6480
2736
00:21
Of course there are other challenges --
2
9240
2536
00:23
health care, disease burdens
and pandemics,
3
11800
3136
00:26
environmental challenges
4
14960
1800
00:29
and, of course, radicalized terrorism.
5
17400
2680
00:32
However,
6
20800
1216
00:34
to the extent that we can actually
solve the economic growth challenge,
7
22040
4576
00:38
it will take us a long way
8
26640
1336
00:40
to solving the challenges
that I've just elucidated.
9
28000
2600
00:43
More importantly,
10
31400
1656
00:45
unless and until we solve economic growth
11
33080
4496
00:49
and create sustainable,
long-term economic growth,
12
37600
4016
00:53
we'll be unable to address
13
41640
2416
00:56
the seemingly intractable challenges
that continue to pervade the globe today,
14
44080
5336
01:01
whether it's health care,
education or economic development.
15
49440
4400
01:06
The fundamental question is this:
16
54680
2200
01:09
How are we going to create economic growth
17
57520
2616
01:12
in advanced and developed economies
like the United States and across Europe
18
60160
4576
01:16
at a time when they continue to struggle
19
64760
2056
01:18
to create economic growth
after the financial crisis?
20
66840
2800
01:22
They continue to underperform
21
70480
2776
01:25
and to see an erosion in the three
key drivers of economic growth:
22
73280
4120
01:30
capital, labor and productivity.
23
78040
3320
01:34
In particular,
24
82120
1456
01:35
these developed economies
continue to see debts and deficits,
25
83600
4936
01:40
the decline and erosion
of both the quality and quantity of labor
26
88560
4856
01:45
and they also see productivity stalling.
27
93440
2280
01:48
In a similar vein,
28
96600
1696
01:50
how are we going to create
economic growth in the emerging markets,
29
98320
3416
01:53
where 90 percent
of the world's population lives
30
101760
3256
01:57
and where, on average,
31
105040
1536
01:58
70 percent of the population
is under the age of 25?
32
106600
3520
02:02
In these countries,
33
110640
1456
02:04
it is essential that they grow
at a minimum of seven percent a year
34
112120
4176
02:08
in order to put a dent in poverty
35
116320
2096
02:10
and to double per capita incomes
in one generation.
36
118440
3200
02:14
And yet today,
37
122520
2056
02:16
the largest emerging economies --
38
124600
2096
02:18
countries with at least
50 million people --
39
126720
2696
02:21
continue to struggle to reach
that seven percent magic mark.
40
129440
3480
02:25
Worse than that,
41
133760
1216
02:27
countries like India, Russia,
South Africa, Brazil and even China
42
135000
4616
02:31
are falling below
that seven percent number
43
139640
2496
02:34
and, in many cases, actually regressing.
44
142160
2840
02:37
Economic growth matters.
45
145800
1920
02:40
With economic growth,
46
148440
1456
02:41
countries and societies
enter into a virtuous cycle
47
149920
4176
02:46
of upward mobility, opportunity
and improved living standards.
48
154120
4600
02:51
Without growth,
countries contract and atrophy,
49
159240
3816
02:55
not just in the annals
of economic statistics
50
163080
3216
02:58
but also in the meaning of life
and how lives are lived.
51
166320
3520
03:02
Economic growth matters
powerfully for the individual.
52
170600
3720
03:07
If growth wanes,
53
175120
1616
03:08
the risk to human progress
54
176760
2016
03:10
and the risk of political
and social instability rises,
55
178800
4416
03:15
and societies become dimmer,
coarser and smaller.
56
183240
4560
03:20
The context matters.
57
188600
1696
03:22
And countries in emerging markets
58
190320
1616
03:23
do not need to grow at the same
rates as developed countries.
59
191960
3840
03:29
Now, I know some of you in this room
find this to be a risky proposition.
60
197240
4440
03:34
There are some people here
61
202680
1856
03:36
who will turn around
and be quite disillusioned
62
204560
2536
03:39
by what's happened around the world
63
207120
1776
03:40
and basically ascribe that
to economic growth.
64
208920
2600
03:44
You worry about the
overpopulation of the planet.
65
212240
3496
03:47
And looking at the UN's
recent statistics and projections
66
215760
2896
03:50
that the world will have
11 billion people on the planet
67
218680
2696
03:53
before it plateaus in 2100,
68
221400
2576
03:56
you're concerned about what that does
to natural resources --
69
224000
3816
03:59
arable land, potable water,
energy and minerals.
70
227840
4120
04:04
You are also concerned about
the degradation of the environment.
71
232800
3320
04:08
And you worry about how man,
72
236760
3136
04:11
embodied in the corporate globalist,
73
239920
2616
04:14
has become greedy and corrupt.
74
242560
3040
04:18
But I'm here to tell you today
that economic growth
75
246560
3376
04:21
has been the backbone
of changes in living standards
76
249960
3376
04:25
of millions of people around the world.
77
253360
1960
04:27
And more importantly,
78
255960
1816
04:29
it's not just economic growth
that has been driven by capitalism.
79
257800
4480
04:36
The definition of capitalism,
very simply put,
80
264280
3456
04:39
is that the factors of production,
81
267760
2056
04:41
such as trade and industry,
capital and labor,
82
269840
3376
04:45
are left in the hands
of the private sector and not the state.
83
273240
3920
04:49
It's really essential here
that we understand
84
277680
2736
04:52
that fundamentally the critique
is not for economic growth per se
85
280440
5016
04:57
but what has happened to capitalism.
86
285480
2056
04:59
And to the extent that we need to create
economic growth over the long term,
87
287560
4016
05:03
we're going to have to pursue it
with a better form of economic stance.
88
291600
4680
05:09
Economic growth needs capitalism,
89
297320
2896
05:12
but it needs it to work properly.
90
300240
1680
05:14
And as I mentioned a moment ago,
91
302840
2296
05:17
the core of the capitalist system
has been defined by private actors.
92
305160
5960
05:23
And even this, however,
is a very simplistic dichotomy.
93
311720
4056
05:27
Capitalism: good; non-capitalism: bad.
94
315800
2920
05:31
When in practical experience,
95
319120
2656
05:33
capitalism is much more of a spectrum.
96
321800
2456
05:36
And we have countries such as China,
97
324280
2256
05:38
which have practiced
more state capitalism,
98
326560
2416
05:41
and we have countries
like the Unites States
99
329000
2096
05:43
which are more market capitalist.
100
331120
1600
05:45
Our efforts to critique
the capitalist system, however,
101
333160
3136
05:48
have tended to focus
on countries like China
102
336320
3216
05:51
that are in fact
not blatantly market capitalism.
103
339560
3400
05:55
However, there is
a real reason and real concern
104
343600
3656
05:59
for us to now focus our attentions
on purer forms of capitalism,
105
347280
4656
06:03
particularly those embodied
by the United States.
106
351960
2720
06:07
This is really important
107
355280
1776
06:09
because this type of capitalism
108
357080
2456
06:11
has increasingly
been afforded the critique
109
359560
3256
06:14
that it is now fostering corruption
110
362840
2416
06:17
and, worse still,
111
365280
1376
06:18
it's increasing income inequality --
112
366680
2640
06:22
the idea that the few are benefiting
at the expense of the many.
113
370120
4720
06:28
The two really critical questions
that we need to address
114
376760
3216
06:32
is how can we fix capitalism
115
380000
2696
06:34
so that it can help create economic growth
116
382720
2776
06:37
but at the same time
can help to address social ills.
117
385520
3360
06:41
In order to think about that framing,
we have to ask ourselves,
118
389720
3376
06:45
how does capitalism work today?
119
393120
1720
06:47
Very simplistically,
120
395760
1600
06:49
capitalism is set on the basis
of an individual utility maximizer --
121
397960
5776
06:55
a selfish individual
who goes after what he or she wants.
122
403760
4296
07:00
And only after they've
maximized their utility
123
408080
3136
07:03
do they then decide it's important
124
411240
2496
07:05
to provide support
to other social contracts.
125
413760
3080
07:09
Of course, in this system
governments do tax,
126
417360
3416
07:12
and they use part of their revenues
to fund social programs,
127
420800
3736
07:16
recognizing that government's role
is not just regulation
128
424560
2856
07:19
but also to be arbiter of social goods.
129
427440
3280
07:23
But nevertheless,
130
431320
1296
07:24
this framework --
131
432640
1336
07:26
this two-stage framework --
132
434000
1976
07:28
is the basis from which we must now start
133
436000
1976
07:30
to think about how we can
improve the capitalist model.
134
438000
2600
07:33
I would argue that there are
two sides to this challenge.
135
441520
3400
07:37
First of all,
136
445520
1216
07:38
we can draw on the right-wing policies
137
446760
2936
07:41
to see what could be beneficial for us
138
449720
1856
07:43
to think about how
we can improve capitalism.
139
451600
2120
07:46
In particular,
140
454440
1256
07:47
right-leaning policies
141
455720
1736
07:49
have tended to focus on things
like conditional transfers,
142
457480
3456
07:52
where we pay and reward people
for doing the things
143
460960
3016
07:56
that we actually think
can help enhance economic growth.
144
464000
3456
07:59
For example,
145
467480
1216
08:00
sending children to school,
146
468720
1616
08:02
parents could earn money for that,
147
470360
2216
08:04
or getting their children
inoculated or immunized,
148
472600
3376
08:08
parents could get paid for doing that.
149
476000
1880
08:10
Now, quite apart from the debate
150
478360
2096
08:12
on whether or not
we should be paying people
151
480480
2296
08:14
to do what we think they should do anyway,
152
482800
2696
08:17
the fact of the matter
is that pay for performance
153
485520
3176
08:20
has actually yielded some positive results
154
488720
2416
08:23
in places like Mexico,
155
491160
1696
08:24
in Brazil
156
492880
1256
08:26
and also in pilot programs in New York.
157
494160
2600
08:29
But there are also benefits
158
497520
1496
08:31
and significant changes underway
on left-leaning policies.
159
499040
4360
08:35
Arguments that government should
expand its role and responsibility
160
503880
4256
08:40
so that it's not so narrowly defined
161
508160
2216
08:42
and that government should be
much more of an arbiter
162
510400
2495
08:44
of the factors of production
163
512919
1377
08:46
have become commonplace
with the success of China.
164
514320
2400
08:49
But also we've started to have debates
165
517400
2296
08:51
about how the role of the private sector
166
519720
2256
08:54
should move away
from just being a profit motive
167
522000
2576
08:56
and really be more engaged
in the delivery of social programs.
168
524600
3496
09:00
Things like the corporate
social responsibility programs,
169
528120
3216
09:03
albeit small in scale,
170
531360
1976
09:05
are moving in that right direction.
171
533360
1880
09:07
Of course, left-leaning policies
have also tended to blur the lines
172
535960
5216
09:13
between government,
NGOs and private sector.
173
541200
2680
09:16
Two very good examples of this
are the 19th-century United States,
174
544800
3976
09:20
when the infrastructure rollout
175
548800
1616
09:22
was really about
public-private partnerships.
176
550440
3096
09:25
More recently, of course,
177
553560
1416
09:27
the advent of the Internet
has also proven to the world
178
555000
3616
09:30
that public and private can work together
for the betterment of society.
179
558640
3840
09:36
My fundamental message to you is this:
180
564240
3056
09:39
We cannot continue to try and solve
the world economic growth challenges
181
567320
5416
09:44
by being dogmatic
and being unnecessarily ideological.
182
572760
4160
09:49
In order to create sustainable,
long-term economic growth
183
577800
3816
09:53
and solve the challenges and social ills
that continue to plague the world today,
184
581640
4296
09:57
we're going to have to be
more broad-minded
185
585960
2296
10:00
about what might work.
186
588280
1520
10:02
Ultimately,
187
590280
1576
10:03
we have to recognize
that ideology is the enemy of growth.
188
591880
4136
10:08
Thank you.
189
596040
1216
10:09
(Applause)
190
597280
2240
10:15
Bruno Giussani: I want to ask
a couple of questions, Dambisa,
191
603160
2896
10:18
because one could react
to your last sentence
192
606080
2136
10:20
by saying growth is also an ideology,
193
608240
1816
10:22
it's possibly the dominant
ideology of our times.
194
610080
2336
10:24
What do you say
to those who react that way?
195
612440
2096
10:26
DM: Well, I think that that's
completely legitimate,
196
614560
2456
10:29
and I think that we're already
having that discussion.
197
617040
2576
10:31
There's a lot of work
going on around happiness
198
619640
2216
10:33
and other metrics being used
for measuring people's success
199
621880
3496
10:37
and improvements in living standards.
200
625400
1816
10:39
And so I think that we should be open
201
627240
2056
10:41
to what could deliver improvements
in people's living standards
202
629320
2976
10:44
and continue to reduce
poverty around the world.
203
632320
2256
10:46
BG: So you're basically pleading
for rehabilitating growth,
204
634600
2816
10:49
but the only way for that happen
205
637440
1576
10:51
without compromising
the capacity of the earth,
206
639040
2336
10:53
to take us on a long journey,
207
641400
1536
10:54
is for economic growth
208
642960
1656
10:56
somehow to decouple
from the underlying use of resources.
209
644640
2696
10:59
Do you see that happening?
210
647360
1296
11:00
DM: Well, I think that I'm more optimistic
about human ability and ingenuity.
211
648680
4536
11:05
I think if we start to constrain ourselves
212
653240
2176
11:07
using the finite, scarce
and depleting resources
213
655440
3056
11:10
that we know today,
214
658520
1256
11:11
we could get quite negative
215
659800
1336
11:13
and quite concerned
about the way the world is.
216
661160
2216
11:15
However, we've seen the Club of Rome,
217
663400
2296
11:17
we've seen previous claims
218
665720
2416
11:20
that the world would be
running out of resources,
219
668160
2336
11:22
and it's not to argue
that those things are not valid.
220
670520
2576
11:25
But I think, with ingenuity
we could see desalination,
221
673120
2656
11:27
I think we could reinvest in energy,
222
675800
1936
11:29
so that we can actually
get better outcomes.
223
677760
2136
11:31
And so in that sense,
224
679920
1216
11:33
I'm much more optimistic
about what humans can do.
225
681160
2376
11:35
BG: The thing that strikes me
226
683560
1416
11:37
about your proposals
for rehabilitating growth
227
685000
3376
11:40
and taking a different direction
228
688400
1616
11:42
is that you're kind of suggesting
to fix capitalism with more capitalism --
229
690040
5056
11:47
with putting a price tag
on good behavior as incentive
230
695120
3616
11:50
or developing a bigger role
for business in social issues.
231
698760
4176
11:54
Is that what you're suggesting?
232
702960
1496
11:56
DM: I'm suggesting
we have to be open-minded.
233
704480
2136
11:58
I think it is absolutely the case
234
706640
2216
12:00
that traditional models of economic growth
235
708880
2456
12:03
are not working the way
we would like them to.
236
711360
2416
12:05
And I think it's no accident
237
713800
1896
12:07
that today the largest
economy in the world, the United States,
238
715720
3296
12:11
has democracy,
239
719040
1296
12:12
liberal democracy,
as it's core political stance
240
720360
3096
12:15
and it has free market capitalism --
241
723480
2176
12:17
to the extent that it is free --
242
725680
1576
12:19
free market capitalism
as its economic stance.
243
727280
2176
12:21
The second largest economy is China.
244
729480
2136
12:23
It has deprioritized democracy
245
731640
2136
12:25
and it has state capitalism,
which is a completely different model.
246
733800
3176
12:29
These two countries,
completely different political models
247
737000
2736
12:31
and completely different economic models,
248
739760
1976
12:33
and yet they have the same
income inequality number
249
741760
2416
12:36
measured as a Gini coefficient.
250
744200
1496
12:37
I think those are the debates
we should have,
251
745720
2136
12:39
because it's not clear at all
252
747880
2136
12:42
what model we should be adopting,
253
750040
1816
12:43
and I think there needs to be
much more discourse
254
751880
2336
12:46
and much more humility
about what we know and what we don't know.
255
754240
3416
12:49
BG: One last question.
The COP21 is going on in Paris.
256
757680
3376
12:53
If you could send a tweet
257
761080
1496
12:54
to all the heads of state
and heads of delegations there,
258
762600
3296
12:57
what would you say?
259
765920
1376
12:59
DM: Again, I would be very much
about being open-minded.
260
767320
2656
13:02
As you're aware,
261
770000
1216
13:03
the issues around
the environmental concerns
262
771240
2096
13:05
have been on the agenda many times now --
263
773360
1976
13:07
in Copenhagen,
'72 in Stockholm --
264
775360
2256
13:09
and we keep revisiting these issues
265
777640
2296
13:11
partly because there is not
a fundamental agreement,
266
779960
3576
13:15
in fact there's a schism
267
783560
1256
13:16
between what the developed
countries believe and want
268
784840
2736
13:19
and what emerging market countries want.
269
787600
2336
13:21
Emerging market countries need
to continue to create economic growth
270
789960
3216
13:25
so that we don't have political
uncertainty in the those countries.
271
793200
3416
13:28
Developed countries recognize
272
796640
2136
13:30
that they have a real,
important responsibility
273
798800
2256
13:33
not only just to manage
their CO2 emissions
274
801080
2816
13:35
and some of the degradation
that they're contributing to the world,
275
803920
3176
13:39
but also as trendsetters in R&D.
276
807120
1776
13:40
And so they have to come
to the table as well.
277
808920
2256
13:43
But in essence, it cannot be a situation
278
811200
2456
13:45
where we start ascribing policies
to the emerging markets
279
813680
4136
13:49
without developed countries themselves
280
817840
1856
13:51
also taking quite a swipe
at what they're doing
281
819720
2376
13:54
both in demand and supply
in developed markets.
282
822120
2776
13:56
BG: Dambisa, thank you for coming to TED.
DM: Thank you very much.
283
824920
3096
14:00
(Applause)
284
828040
3443

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Dambisa Moyo - Global economist
Dambisa Moyo is an international economist who analyzes the macroeconomy and global affairs.

Why you should listen

Dambisa Moyo's work examines the interplay between rapidly developing countries, international business, and the global economy -- while highlighting opportunities for investment. She has travelled to more than 60 countries over the past decade, studying the political, economic and financial workings of emerging economies, in particular the BRICs and the frontier economies in Asia, South America, Africa and the Middle East. Her latest book, Winner Take All: China’s Race for Resources and What It Means for the World, looks at how commodities markets influence much more than the global economy -- and examines the possible consequences of China's unprecedented rush for commodities such as oil, minerals, water, and food, including the looming specter of commodity-driven conflict.

She is the author of the brilliantly argued Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa and How the West Was Lost: Fifty Years of Economic Folly and the Stark Choices Ahead. Previously, she was an economist at Goldman Sachs, where she worked for nearly a decade, and was a consultant to the World Bank in Washington.

More profile about the speaker
Dambisa Moyo | Speaker | TED.com