ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Katie Bouman - Imaging scientist
Katie Bouman is part of an international team of astronomers that's creating the world's largest telescope to take the very first picture of a black hole.

Why you should listen

It is believed that the heart of the Milky Way hosts a four-million-solar-mass black hole feeding off a spinning disk of hot gas. An image of the shadow cast by the event horizon of the black hole could help to address a number of important scientific questions. For instance, does Einstein's theory of general relativity hold in extreme conditions? Unfortunately, the event horizon of this black hole appears so small in the sky that imaging it would require a single-dish radio telescope the size of the entire Earth. Although a single-dish telescope this large is unrealizable, by connecting disjoint radio telescopes located all around the globe, Katie Bouman and a team of astronomers are creating an Earth-sized computational telescope -- the Event Horizon Telescope -- that is capable of taking the very first up-close picture of a black hole.

Bouman is a PhD candidate in the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). The focus of her research is on using emerging computational methods to push the boundaries of interdisciplinary imaging. By combining techniques from both astronomy and computer science, Bouman has been working on developing innovative ways to combine the information from the Event Horizon Telescope network to produce the first picture of a black hole. Her work on imaging for the Event Horizon Telescope has been featured on BBCThe Boston GlobeThe Washington PostPopular Science and NPR.

More profile about the speaker
Katie Bouman | Speaker | TED.com
TEDxBeaconStreet

Katie Bouman: How to take a picture of a black hole

Filmed:
5,455,257 views

At the heart of the Milky Way, there's a supermassive black hole that feeds off a spinning disk of hot gas, sucking up anything that ventures too close -- even light. We can't see it, but its event horizon casts a shadow, and an image of that shadow could help answer some important questions about the universe. Scientists used to think that making such an image would require a telescope the size of Earth -- until Katie Bouman and a team of astronomers came up with a clever alternative. Bouman explains how we can take a picture of the ultimate dark using the Event Horizon Telescope.
- Imaging scientist
Katie Bouman is part of an international team of astronomers that's creating the world's largest telescope to take the very first picture of a black hole. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:13
In the movie "Interstellar,"
0
1436
1860
00:15
we get an up-close look
at a supermassive black hole.
1
3320
3327
00:18
Set against a backdrop of bright gas,
2
6671
2143
00:20
the black hole's massive
gravitational pull
3
8838
2118
00:22
bends light into a ring.
4
10980
1435
00:24
However, this isn't a real photograph,
5
12439
2109
00:26
but a computer graphic rendering --
6
14572
1786
00:28
an artistic interpretation
of what a black hole might look like.
7
16382
3390
00:32
A hundred years ago,
8
20401
1166
00:33
Albert Einstein first published
his theory of general relativity.
9
21591
3601
00:37
In the years since then,
10
25216
1439
00:38
scientists have provided
a lot of evidence in support of it.
11
26679
2973
00:41
But one thing predicted
from this theory, black holes,
12
29676
3084
00:44
still have not been directly observed.
13
32784
2350
00:47
Although we have some idea
as to what a black hole might look like,
14
35158
3206
00:50
we've never actually taken
a picture of one before.
15
38388
2779
00:53
However, you might be surprised to know
that that may soon change.
16
41191
4279
00:57
We may be seeing our first picture
of a black hole in the next couple years.
17
45494
4164
01:01
Getting this first picture will come down
to an international team of scientists,
18
49682
3958
01:05
an Earth-sized telescope
19
53664
1567
01:07
and an algorithm that puts together
the final picture.
20
55255
2832
01:10
Although I won't be able to show you
a real picture of a black hole today,
21
58111
3528
01:13
I'd like to give you a brief glimpse
into the effort involved
22
61663
2911
01:16
in getting that first picture.
23
64598
1613
01:19
My name is Katie Bouman,
24
67477
1437
01:20
and I'm a PhD student at MIT.
25
68938
2566
01:23
I do research in a computer science lab
26
71528
2027
01:25
that works on making computers
see through images and video.
27
73579
3298
01:28
But although I'm not an astronomer,
28
76901
2162
01:31
today I'd like to show you
29
79087
1285
01:32
how I've been able to contribute
to this exciting project.
30
80396
2903
01:35
If you go out past
the bright city lights tonight,
31
83323
2831
01:38
you may just be lucky enough
to see a stunning view
32
86178
2436
01:40
of the Milky Way Galaxy.
33
88638
1493
01:42
And if you could zoom past
millions of stars,
34
90155
2462
01:44
26,000 light-years toward the heart
of the spiraling Milky Way,
35
92641
3755
01:48
we'd eventually reach
a cluster of stars right at the center.
36
96420
3521
01:51
Peering past all the galactic dust
with infrared telescopes,
37
99965
3206
01:55
astronomers have watched these stars
for over 16 years.
38
103195
3867
01:59
But it's what they don't see
that is the most spectacular.
39
107086
3589
02:02
These stars seem to orbit
an invisible object.
40
110699
3066
02:05
By tracking the paths of these stars,
41
113789
2323
02:08
astronomers have concluded
42
116136
1294
02:09
that the only thing small and heavy
enough to cause this motion
43
117454
3129
02:12
is a supermassive black hole --
44
120607
1968
02:14
an object so dense that it sucks up
anything that ventures too close --
45
122599
4178
02:18
even light.
46
126801
1494
02:20
But what happens if we were
to zoom in even further?
47
128319
3061
02:23
Is it possible to see something
that, by definition, is impossible to see?
48
131404
4733
02:28
Well, it turns out that if we were
to zoom in at radio wavelengths,
49
136719
3244
02:31
we'd expect to see a ring of light
50
139987
1682
02:33
caused by the gravitational
lensing of hot plasma
51
141693
2411
02:36
zipping around the black hole.
52
144128
1829
02:37
In other words,
53
145981
1160
02:39
the black hole casts a shadow
on this backdrop of bright material,
54
147165
3171
02:42
carving out a sphere of darkness.
55
150360
1842
02:44
This bright ring reveals
the black hole's event horizon,
56
152226
3339
02:47
where the gravitational pull
becomes so great
57
155589
2400
02:50
that not even light can escape.
58
158013
1626
02:51
Einstein's equations predict
the size and shape of this ring,
59
159663
2859
02:54
so taking a picture of it
wouldn't only be really cool,
60
162546
3208
02:57
it would also help to verify
that these equations hold
61
165778
2618
03:00
in the extreme conditions
around the black hole.
62
168420
2466
03:02
However, this black hole
is so far away from us,
63
170910
2558
03:05
that from Earth, this ring appears
incredibly small --
64
173492
3098
03:08
the same size to us as an orange
on the surface of the moon.
65
176614
3590
03:12
That makes taking a picture of it
extremely difficult.
66
180758
2824
03:16
Why is that?
67
184645
1302
03:18
Well, it all comes down
to a simple equation.
68
186512
3188
03:21
Due to a phenomenon called diffraction,
69
189724
2416
03:24
there are fundamental limits
70
192164
1355
03:25
to the smallest objects
that we can possibly see.
71
193543
2670
03:28
This governing equation says
that in order to see smaller and smaller,
72
196789
3672
03:32
we need to make our telescope
bigger and bigger.
73
200485
2587
03:35
But even with the most powerful
optical telescopes here on Earth,
74
203096
3069
03:38
we can't even get close
to the resolution necessary
75
206189
2419
03:40
to image on the surface of the moon.
76
208632
2198
03:42
In fact, here I show one of the highest
resolution images ever taken
77
210854
3617
03:46
of the moon from Earth.
78
214495
1397
03:47
It contains roughly 13,000 pixels,
79
215916
2557
03:50
and yet each pixel would contain
over 1.5 million oranges.
80
218497
4050
03:55
So how big of a telescope do we need
81
223396
1972
03:57
in order to see an orange
on the surface of the moon
82
225392
2765
04:00
and, by extension, our black hole?
83
228181
2214
04:02
Well, it turns out
that by crunching the numbers,
84
230419
2340
04:04
you can easily calculate
that we would need a telescope
85
232783
2610
04:07
the size of the entire Earth.
86
235417
1393
04:08
(Laughter)
87
236834
1024
04:09
If we could build
this Earth-sized telescope,
88
237882
2119
04:12
we could just start to make out
that distinctive ring of light
89
240025
2925
04:14
indicative of the black
hole's event horizon.
90
242974
2183
04:17
Although this picture wouldn't contain
all the detail we see
91
245181
2918
04:20
in computer graphic renderings,
92
248123
1506
04:21
it would allow us to safely get
our first glimpse
93
249653
2299
04:23
of the immediate environment
around a black hole.
94
251976
2487
04:26
However, as you can imagine,
95
254487
1613
04:28
building a single-dish telescope
the size of the Earth is impossible.
96
256124
3624
04:31
But in the famous words of Mick Jagger,
97
259772
1887
04:33
"You can't always get what you want,
98
261683
1791
04:35
but if you try sometimes,
you just might find
99
263498
2187
04:37
you get what you need."
100
265709
1215
04:38
And by connecting telescopes
from around the world,
101
266948
2464
04:41
an international collaboration
called the Event Horizon Telescope
102
269436
3538
04:44
is creating a computational telescope
the size of the Earth,
103
272998
3109
04:48
capable of resolving structure
104
276131
1537
04:49
on the scale of a black
hole's event horizon.
105
277692
2199
04:51
This network of telescopes is scheduled
to take its very first picture
106
279915
3387
04:55
of a black hole next year.
107
283326
1815
04:57
Each telescope in the worldwide
network works together.
108
285165
3338
05:00
Linked through the precise timing
of atomic clocks,
109
288527
2712
05:03
teams of researchers at each
of the sights freeze light
110
291263
2657
05:05
by collecting thousands
of terabytes of data.
111
293944
2962
05:08
This data is then processed in a lab
right here in Massachusetts.
112
296930
5017
05:13
So how does this even work?
113
301971
1794
05:15
Remember if we want to see the black hole
in the center of our galaxy,
114
303789
3403
05:19
we need to build this impossibly large
Earth-sized telescope?
115
307216
2982
05:22
For just a second,
let's pretend we could build
116
310222
2232
05:24
a telescope the size of the Earth.
117
312478
1842
05:26
This would be a little bit
like turning the Earth
118
314344
2455
05:28
into a giant spinning disco ball.
119
316823
1747
05:30
Each individual mirror would collect light
120
318594
2200
05:32
that we could then combine
together to make a picture.
121
320818
2597
05:35
However, now let's say
we remove most of those mirrors
122
323439
2661
05:38
so only a few remained.
123
326124
1972
05:40
We could still try to combine
this information together,
124
328120
2877
05:43
but now there are a lot of holes.
125
331021
1993
05:45
These remaining mirrors represent
the locations where we have telescopes.
126
333038
4373
05:49
This is an incredibly small number
of measurements to make a picture from.
127
337435
4079
05:53
But although we only collect light
at a few telescope locations,
128
341538
3838
05:57
as the Earth rotates, we get to see
other new measurements.
129
345400
3423
06:00
In other words, as the disco ball spins,
those mirrors change locations
130
348847
3819
06:04
and we get to observe
different parts of the image.
131
352690
2899
06:07
The imaging algorithms we develop
fill in the missing gaps of the disco ball
132
355613
4018
06:11
in order to reconstruct
the underlying black hole image.
133
359655
3033
06:14
If we had telescopes located
everywhere on the globe --
134
362712
2636
06:17
in other words, the entire disco ball --
135
365372
1941
06:19
this would be trivial.
136
367337
1284
06:20
However, we only see a few samples,
and for that reason,
137
368645
3322
06:23
there are an infinite number
of possible images
138
371991
2388
06:26
that are perfectly consistent
with our telescope measurements.
139
374403
2964
06:29
However, not all images are created equal.
140
377391
3016
06:32
Some of those images look more like
what we think of as images than others.
141
380849
4458
06:37
And so, my role in helping to take
the first image of a black hole
142
385331
3222
06:40
is to design algorithms that find
the most reasonable image
143
388577
2932
06:43
that also fits the telescope measurements.
144
391533
2222
06:46
Just as a forensic sketch artist
uses limited descriptions
145
394727
3942
06:50
to piece together a picture using
their knowledge of face structure,
146
398693
3514
06:54
the imaging algorithms I develop
use our limited telescope data
147
402231
3315
06:57
to guide us to a picture that also
looks like stuff in our universe.
148
405570
4322
07:01
Using these algorithms,
we're able to piece together pictures
149
409916
3651
07:05
from this sparse, noisy data.
150
413591
2180
07:07
So here I show a sample reconstruction
done using simulated data,
151
415795
4529
07:12
when we pretend to point our telescopes
152
420348
1933
07:14
to the black hole
in the center of our galaxy.
153
422305
2585
07:16
Although this is just a simulation,
reconstruction such as this give us hope
154
424914
4455
07:21
that we'll soon be able to reliably take
the first image of a black hole
155
429393
3453
07:24
and from it, determine
the size of its ring.
156
432870
2595
07:28
Although I'd love to go on
about all the details of this algorithm,
157
436118
3199
07:31
luckily for you, I don't have the time.
158
439341
2174
07:33
But I'd still like
to give you a brief idea
159
441539
2001
07:35
of how we define
what our universe looks like,
160
443564
2302
07:37
and how we use this to reconstruct
and verify our results.
161
445890
4466
07:42
Since there are an infinite number
of possible images
162
450380
2496
07:44
that perfectly explain
our telescope measurements,
163
452900
2365
07:47
we have to choose
between them in some way.
164
455289
2605
07:49
We do this by ranking the images
165
457918
1838
07:51
based upon how likely they are
to be the black hole image,
166
459780
2834
07:54
and then choosing the one
that's most likely.
167
462638
2482
07:57
So what do I mean by this exactly?
168
465144
2195
07:59
Let's say we were trying to make a model
169
467862
1978
08:01
that told us how likely an image
were to appear on Facebook.
170
469864
3183
08:05
We'd probably want the model to say
171
473071
1701
08:06
it's pretty unlikely that someone
would post this noise image on the left,
172
474796
3557
08:10
and pretty likely that someone
would post a selfie
173
478377
2419
08:12
like this one on the right.
174
480820
1334
08:14
The image in the middle is blurry,
175
482178
1639
08:15
so even though it's more likely
we'd see it on Facebook
176
483841
2639
08:18
compared to the noise image,
177
486504
1360
08:19
it's probably less likely we'd see it
compared to the selfie.
178
487888
2960
08:22
But when it comes to images
from the black hole,
179
490872
2290
08:25
we're posed with a real conundrum:
we've never seen a black hole before.
180
493186
3502
08:28
In that case, what is a likely
black hole image,
181
496712
2291
08:31
and what should we assume
about the structure of black holes?
182
499027
2938
08:33
We could try to use images
from simulations we've done,
183
501989
2632
08:36
like the image of the black hole
from "Interstellar,"
184
504645
2530
08:39
but if we did this,
it could cause some serious problems.
185
507199
2938
08:42
What would happen
if Einstein's theories didn't hold?
186
510161
3380
08:45
We'd still want to reconstruct
an accurate picture of what was going on.
187
513565
3961
08:49
If we bake Einstein's equations
too much into our algorithms,
188
517550
3371
08:52
we'll just end up seeing
what we expect to see.
189
520945
2755
08:55
In other words,
we want to leave the option open
190
523724
2276
08:58
for there being a giant elephant
at the center of our galaxy.
191
526024
2923
09:00
(Laughter)
192
528971
1057
09:02
Different types of images have
very distinct features.
193
530052
2989
09:05
We can easily tell the difference
between black hole simulation images
194
533065
3548
09:08
and images we take
every day here on Earth.
195
536637
2276
09:10
We need a way to tell our algorithms
what images look like
196
538937
3104
09:14
without imposing one type
of image's features too much.
197
542065
3249
09:17
One way we can try to get around this
198
545865
1893
09:19
is by imposing the features
of different kinds of images
199
547782
3062
09:22
and seeing how the type of image we assume
affects our reconstructions.
200
550868
4130
09:27
If all images' types produce
a very similar-looking image,
201
555712
3491
09:31
then we can start to become more confident
202
559227
2057
09:33
that the image assumptions we're making
are not biasing this picture that much.
203
561308
4173
09:37
This is a little bit like
giving the same description
204
565505
2990
09:40
to three different sketch artists
from all around the world.
205
568519
2996
09:43
If they all produce
a very similar-looking face,
206
571539
2860
09:46
then we can start to become confident
207
574423
1793
09:48
that they're not imposing their own
cultural biases on the drawings.
208
576240
3616
09:51
One way we can try to impose
different image features
209
579880
3315
09:55
is by using pieces of existing images.
210
583219
2441
09:58
So we take a large collection of images,
211
586214
2160
10:00
and we break them down
into their little image patches.
212
588398
2718
10:03
We then can treat each image patch
a little bit like pieces of a puzzle.
213
591140
4285
10:07
And we use commonly seen puzzle pieces
to piece together an image
214
595449
4278
10:11
that also fits our telescope measurements.
215
599751
2452
10:15
Different types of images have
very distinctive sets of puzzle pieces.
216
603040
3743
10:18
So what happens when we take the same data
217
606807
2806
10:21
but we use different sets of puzzle pieces
to reconstruct the image?
218
609637
4130
10:25
Let's first start with black hole
image simulation puzzle pieces.
219
613791
4766
10:30
OK, this looks reasonable.
220
618581
1591
10:32
This looks like what we expect
a black hole to look like.
221
620196
2694
10:34
But did we just get it
222
622914
1193
10:36
because we just fed it little pieces
of black hole simulation images?
223
624131
3314
10:39
Let's try another set of puzzle pieces
224
627469
1880
10:41
from astronomical, non-black hole objects.
225
629373
2509
10:44
OK, we get a similar-looking image.
226
632914
2126
10:47
And then how about pieces
from everyday images,
227
635064
2236
10:49
like the images you take
with your own personal camera?
228
637324
2785
10:53
Great, we see the same image.
229
641312
2115
10:55
When we get the same image
from all different sets of puzzle pieces,
230
643451
3366
10:58
then we can start to become more confident
231
646841
2046
11:00
that the image assumptions we're making
232
648911
1966
11:02
aren't biasing the final
image we get too much.
233
650901
2921
11:05
Another thing we can do is take
the same set of puzzle pieces,
234
653846
3253
11:09
such as the ones derived
from everyday images,
235
657123
2489
11:11
and use them to reconstruct
many different kinds of source images.
236
659636
3600
11:15
So in our simulations,
237
663260
1271
11:16
we pretend a black hole looks like
astronomical non-black hole objects,
238
664555
3775
11:20
as well as everyday images like
the elephant in the center of our galaxy.
239
668354
3849
11:24
When the results of our algorithms
on the bottom look very similar
240
672227
3168
11:27
to the simulation's truth image on top,
241
675419
2096
11:29
then we can start to become
more confident in our algorithms.
242
677539
3346
11:32
And I really want to emphasize here
243
680909
1867
11:34
that all of these pictures were created
244
682800
1934
11:36
by piecing together little pieces
of everyday photographs,
245
684758
2936
11:39
like you'd take with your own
personal camera.
246
687718
2215
11:41
So an image of a black hole
we've never seen before
247
689957
3276
11:45
may eventually be created by piecing
together pictures we see all the time
248
693257
3943
11:49
of people, buildings,
trees, cats and dogs.
249
697224
2745
11:51
Imaging ideas like this
will make it possible for us
250
699993
2645
11:54
to take our very first pictures
of a black hole,
251
702662
2619
11:57
and hopefully, verify
those famous theories
252
705305
2447
11:59
on which scientists rely on a daily basis.
253
707776
2421
12:02
But of course, getting
imaging ideas like this working
254
710221
2608
12:04
would never have been possible
without the amazing team of researchers
255
712853
3322
12:08
that I have the privilege to work with.
256
716199
1887
12:10
It still amazes me
257
718110
1163
12:11
that although I began this project
with no background in astrophysics,
258
719297
3351
12:14
what we have achieved
through this unique collaboration
259
722672
2619
12:17
could result in the very first
images of a black hole.
260
725315
2759
12:20
But big projects like
the Event Horizon Telescope
261
728098
2698
12:22
are successful due to all
the interdisciplinary expertise
262
730820
2814
12:25
different people bring to the table.
263
733658
1790
12:27
We're a melting pot of astronomers,
264
735472
1706
12:29
physicists, mathematicians and engineers.
265
737202
2232
12:31
This is what will make it soon possible
266
739458
2554
12:34
to achieve something
once thought impossible.
267
742036
2853
12:36
I'd like to encourage all of you to go out
268
744913
2256
12:39
and help push the boundaries of science,
269
747193
2096
12:41
even if it may at first seem
as mysterious to you as a black hole.
270
749313
3901
12:45
Thank you.
271
753238
1174
12:46
(Applause)
272
754436
2397

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Katie Bouman - Imaging scientist
Katie Bouman is part of an international team of astronomers that's creating the world's largest telescope to take the very first picture of a black hole.

Why you should listen

It is believed that the heart of the Milky Way hosts a four-million-solar-mass black hole feeding off a spinning disk of hot gas. An image of the shadow cast by the event horizon of the black hole could help to address a number of important scientific questions. For instance, does Einstein's theory of general relativity hold in extreme conditions? Unfortunately, the event horizon of this black hole appears so small in the sky that imaging it would require a single-dish radio telescope the size of the entire Earth. Although a single-dish telescope this large is unrealizable, by connecting disjoint radio telescopes located all around the globe, Katie Bouman and a team of astronomers are creating an Earth-sized computational telescope -- the Event Horizon Telescope -- that is capable of taking the very first up-close picture of a black hole.

Bouman is a PhD candidate in the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). The focus of her research is on using emerging computational methods to push the boundaries of interdisciplinary imaging. By combining techniques from both astronomy and computer science, Bouman has been working on developing innovative ways to combine the information from the Event Horizon Telescope network to produce the first picture of a black hole. Her work on imaging for the Event Horizon Telescope has been featured on BBCThe Boston GlobeThe Washington PostPopular Science and NPR.

More profile about the speaker
Katie Bouman | Speaker | TED.com