ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Dimitar Sasselov - Astronomer
Dimitar Sasselov works on uniting the physical and life sciences in the hunt for answers to the question of how life began.

Why you should listen

Dimitar Sasselov is an astronomer who explores the interaction between light and matter. He studies, among other things, extrasolar planets, and he's a co-investigator on NASA's Kepler mission, which is monitoring 100,000 stars in a three-year hunt for exoplanets -- including Jupiter-sized giants. Sasselov watches for exoplanets by looking for transits, the act of a planet passing across the face of its star, dimming its light and changing its chemical signature. This simple, elegant way of searching has led to a bounty of newly discovered planets.

Sasselov is the director of Harvard's Origins of Life Initiative, a new interdisciplinary institute that joins biologists, chemists and astronomers in searching for the starting points of life on Earth (and possibly elsewhere). What is an astronomer doing looking for the origins of life, a question more often asked by biologists? Sasselov suggests that planetary conditions are the seedbed of life; knowing the composition and conditions of a planet will give us clues, perhaps, as to how life might form there. And as we discover new planets that might host life, having a working definition of life will help us screen for possible new forms of it. Other institute members such as biologist George Church and chemist George Whitesides work on the question from other angles, looking for (and building) alternative biologies that might fit conditions elsewhere in the universe.

More profile about the speaker
Dimitar Sasselov | Speaker | TED.com
TEDGlobal 2010

Dimitar Sasselov: How we found hundreds of potential Earth-like planets

Filmed:
1,279,451 views

Astronomer Dimitar Sasselov and his colleagues search for Earth-like planets that may, someday, help us answer centuries-old questions about the origin and existence of biological life elsewhere (and on Earth). Preliminary results show that they have found 706 "candidates" -- some of which further research may prove to be planets with Earth-like geochemical characteristics. NOTE: This talk was given in 2010, and this field of science has developed quickly since then. Read "Criticisms & updates" below for more details.
- Astronomer
Dimitar Sasselov works on uniting the physical and life sciences in the hunt for answers to the question of how life began. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:15
Well, indeed, I'm very, very lucky.
0
0
3000
00:18
My talk essentially got written
1
3000
2000
00:20
by three historic events
2
5000
2000
00:22
that happened within days of each other
3
7000
2000
00:24
in the last two months --
4
9000
3000
00:27
seemingly unrelated, but as you will see,
5
12000
2000
00:29
actually all having to do with
6
14000
2000
00:31
the story I want to tell you today.
7
16000
2000
00:33
The first one was actually a funeral --
8
18000
3000
00:36
to be more precise, a reburial.
9
21000
2000
00:38
On May 22nd, there was a hero's reburial
10
23000
3000
00:41
in Frombork, Poland
11
26000
2000
00:43
of the 16th-century astronomer
12
28000
3000
00:46
who actually changed the world.
13
31000
2000
00:48
He did that, literally,
14
33000
2000
00:50
by replacing the Earth with the Sun
15
35000
3000
00:53
in the center of the Solar System,
16
38000
2000
00:55
and then with this simple-looking act,
17
40000
3000
00:58
he actually launched a scientific
18
43000
2000
01:00
and technological revolution,
19
45000
2000
01:02
which many call the Copernican Revolution.
20
47000
3000
01:05
Now that was,
21
50000
2000
01:07
ironically, and very befittingly,
22
52000
3000
01:10
the way we found his grave.
23
55000
2000
01:12
As it was the custom of the time,
24
57000
2000
01:14
Copernicus was actually
25
59000
2000
01:16
simply buried in an unmarked grave,
26
61000
3000
01:19
together with 14 others
27
64000
2000
01:21
in that cathedral.
28
66000
3000
01:24
DNA analysis,
29
69000
2000
01:26
one of the hallmarks
30
71000
2000
01:28
of the scientific revolution
31
73000
2000
01:30
of the last 400 years that he started,
32
75000
3000
01:33
was the way we found
33
78000
2000
01:35
which set of bones
34
80000
2000
01:37
actually belonged to the person
35
82000
2000
01:39
who read all those astronomical books
36
84000
3000
01:42
which were filled with leftover hair
37
87000
2000
01:44
that was Copernicus' hair --
38
89000
2000
01:46
obviously not many other people
39
91000
2000
01:48
bothered to read these books later on.
40
93000
2000
01:50
That match was unambiguous.
41
95000
2000
01:52
The DNA matched,
42
97000
2000
01:54
and we know that this was indeed
43
99000
2000
01:56
Nicolaus Copernicus.
44
101000
2000
01:58
Now, the connection between
45
103000
2000
02:00
biology and DNA
46
105000
2000
02:02
and life
47
107000
2000
02:04
is very tantalizing when you talk about Copernicus
48
109000
2000
02:06
because, even back then,
49
111000
2000
02:08
his followers
50
113000
2000
02:10
very quickly made the logical step
51
115000
2000
02:12
to ask: if the Earth is just a planet,
52
117000
3000
02:15
then what about planets around other stars?
53
120000
3000
02:18
What about the idea of the plurality of the worlds,
54
123000
2000
02:20
about life on other planets?
55
125000
2000
02:22
In fact, I'm borrowing here from one of those
56
127000
2000
02:24
very popular books of the time.
57
129000
2000
02:26
And at the time,
58
131000
2000
02:28
people actually answered that question
59
133000
2000
02:30
positively: "Yes."
60
135000
2000
02:32
But there was no evidence.
61
137000
3000
02:35
And here begins 400 years
62
140000
3000
02:38
of frustration, of unfulfilled dreams --
63
143000
3000
02:41
the dreams of Galileo, Giordano Bruno,
64
146000
3000
02:44
many others --
65
149000
2000
02:46
which never led to the answer
66
151000
2000
02:48
of those very basic questions
67
153000
2000
02:50
which humanity has asked all the time.
68
155000
2000
02:52
"What is life? What is the origin of life?
69
157000
2000
02:54
Are we alone?"
70
159000
2000
02:56
And that especially happened in the last 10 years,
71
161000
3000
02:59
at the end of the 20th century,
72
164000
2000
03:01
when the beautiful developments
73
166000
2000
03:03
due to molecular biology,
74
168000
2000
03:05
understanding the code of life, DNA,
75
170000
2000
03:07
all of that seemed to actually
76
172000
2000
03:09
put us, not closer,
77
174000
2000
03:11
but further apart from answering
78
176000
2000
03:13
those basic questions.
79
178000
2000
03:16
Now, the good news.
80
181000
2000
03:18
A lot has happened in the last few years,
81
183000
2000
03:20
and let's start with the planets.
82
185000
2000
03:22
Let's start with the old Copernican question:
83
187000
3000
03:25
Are there earths around other stars?
84
190000
3000
03:28
And as we already heard,
85
193000
2000
03:30
there is a way in which
86
195000
2000
03:32
we are trying, and now able,
87
197000
2000
03:34
to answer that question.
88
199000
2000
03:36
It's a new telescope.
89
201000
2000
03:38
Our team, befittingly I think,
90
203000
2000
03:40
named it after one of those dreamers
91
205000
2000
03:42
of the Copernican time,
92
207000
2000
03:44
Johannes Kepler,
93
209000
2000
03:46
and that telescope's sole purpose
94
211000
2000
03:48
is to go out,
95
213000
2000
03:50
find the planets that orbit
96
215000
2000
03:52
other stars in our galaxy,
97
217000
2000
03:54
and tell us how often do planets like our own Earth
98
219000
3000
03:57
happen to be out there.
99
222000
3000
04:00
The telescope is actually
100
225000
2000
04:02
built similarly to
101
227000
2000
04:04
the, well-known to you, Hubble Space Telescope,
102
229000
2000
04:06
except it does have an additional lens --
103
231000
3000
04:09
a wide-field lens,
104
234000
2000
04:11
as you would call it as a photographer.
105
236000
2000
04:13
And if, in the next couple of months,
106
238000
2000
04:15
you walk out in the early evening
107
240000
2000
04:17
and look straight up
108
242000
2000
04:19
and place you palm like this,
109
244000
2000
04:21
you will actually be looking at the field of the sky
110
246000
3000
04:24
where this telescope is searching for planets
111
249000
3000
04:27
day and night, without any interruption,
112
252000
2000
04:29
for the next four years.
113
254000
3000
04:32
The way we do that, actually,
114
257000
2000
04:34
is with a method, which we call the transit method.
115
259000
3000
04:37
It's actually mini-eclipses that occur
116
262000
2000
04:39
when a planet passes in front of its star.
117
264000
2000
04:41
Not all of the planets will be fortuitously oriented
118
266000
3000
04:44
for us to be able do that,
119
269000
2000
04:46
but if you have a million stars,
120
271000
3000
04:49
you'll find enough planets.
121
274000
2000
04:51
And as you see on this animation,
122
276000
3000
04:54
what Kepler is going to detect
123
279000
2000
04:56
is just the dimming of the light from the star.
124
281000
3000
04:59
We are not going to see the image of the star and the planet as this.
125
284000
3000
05:02
All the stars for Kepler are just points of light.
126
287000
3000
05:05
But we learn a lot from that:
127
290000
2000
05:07
not only that there is a planet there, but we also learn its size.
128
292000
3000
05:10
How much of the light is being dimmed
129
295000
2000
05:12
depends on how big the planet is.
130
297000
3000
05:15
We learn about its orbit,
131
300000
2000
05:17
the period of its orbit and so on.
132
302000
2000
05:19
So, what have we learned?
133
304000
3000
05:22
Well, let me try to walk you through
134
307000
3000
05:25
what we actually see
135
310000
2000
05:27
and so you understand the news
136
312000
2000
05:29
that I'm here to tell you today.
137
314000
2000
05:31
What Kepler does
138
316000
2000
05:33
is discover a lot of candidates,
139
318000
2000
05:35
which we then follow up and find as planets,
140
320000
2000
05:37
confirm as planets.
141
322000
2000
05:39
It basically tells us
142
324000
2000
05:41
this is the distribution of planets in size.
143
326000
3000
05:44
There are small planets, there are bigger planets, there are big planets, okay.
144
329000
3000
05:47
So we count many, many such planets,
145
332000
3000
05:50
and they have different sizes.
146
335000
2000
05:52
We do that in our solar system.
147
337000
2000
05:54
In fact, even back during the ancients,
148
339000
3000
05:57
the Solar System in that sense
149
342000
2000
05:59
would look on a diagram like this.
150
344000
2000
06:01
There will be the smaller planets, and there will be the big planets,
151
346000
3000
06:04
even back to the time of Epicurus
152
349000
2000
06:06
and then of course Copernicus
153
351000
2000
06:08
and his followers.
154
353000
2000
06:10
Up until recently, that was the Solar System --
155
355000
2000
06:12
four Earth-like planets with small radius,
156
357000
3000
06:15
smaller than about two times the size of the Earth --
157
360000
3000
06:18
and that was of course Mercury,
158
363000
2000
06:20
Venus, Mars,
159
365000
2000
06:22
and of course the Earth,
160
367000
2000
06:24
and then the two big, giant planets.
161
369000
2000
06:26
Then the Copernican Revolution
162
371000
2000
06:28
brought in telescopes,
163
373000
2000
06:30
and of course three more planets were discovered.
164
375000
2000
06:32
Now the total planet number
165
377000
2000
06:34
in our solar system was nine.
166
379000
2000
06:36
The small planets dominated,
167
381000
2000
06:38
and there was a certain harmony to that,
168
383000
2000
06:40
which actually Copernicus was very happy to note,
169
385000
3000
06:43
and Kepler was one of the big proponents of.
170
388000
3000
06:46
So now we have Pluto to join the numbers of small planets.
171
391000
3000
06:49
But up until, literally, 15 years ago,
172
394000
3000
06:52
that was all we knew about planets.
173
397000
2000
06:54
And that's what the frustration was.
174
399000
2000
06:56
The Copernican dream was unfulfilled.
175
401000
3000
06:59
Finally, 15 years ago,
176
404000
2000
07:01
the technology came to the point
177
406000
2000
07:03
where we could discover a planet around another star,
178
408000
3000
07:06
and we actually did pretty well.
179
411000
3000
07:09
In the next 15 years,
180
414000
2000
07:11
almost 500 planets
181
416000
2000
07:13
were discovered orbiting other stars, with different methods.
182
418000
3000
07:16
Unfortunately, as you can see,
183
421000
3000
07:19
there was a very different picture.
184
424000
2000
07:21
There was of course an explanation for it:
185
426000
2000
07:23
We only see the big planets,
186
428000
2000
07:25
so that's why most of those planets
187
430000
2000
07:27
are really in the category of "like Jupiter."
188
432000
3000
07:30
But you see, we haven't gone very far.
189
435000
3000
07:33
We were still back where Copernicus was.
190
438000
3000
07:36
We didn't have any evidence
191
441000
2000
07:38
whether planets like the Earth are out there.
192
443000
2000
07:40
And we do care about planets like the Earth
193
445000
3000
07:43
because by now we understood
194
448000
2000
07:45
that life as a chemical system
195
450000
3000
07:48
really needs a smaller planet
196
453000
2000
07:50
with water and with rocks
197
455000
2000
07:52
and with a lot of complex chemistry
198
457000
2000
07:54
to originate, to emerge, to survive.
199
459000
3000
07:57
And we didn't have the evidence for that.
200
462000
3000
08:00
So today, I'm here to actually give you a first glimpse
201
465000
2000
08:02
of what the new telescope, Kepler,
202
467000
3000
08:05
has been able to tell us in the last few weeks,
203
470000
3000
08:08
and, lo and behold,
204
473000
2000
08:10
we are back to the harmony
205
475000
2000
08:12
and to fulfilling the dreams of Copernicus.
206
477000
3000
08:15
You can see here,
207
480000
2000
08:17
the small planets dominate the picture.
208
482000
2000
08:19
The planets which are marked "like Earth,"
209
484000
3000
08:22
[are] definitely more than
210
487000
2000
08:24
any other planets that we see.
211
489000
2000
08:26
And now for the first time, we can say that.
212
491000
2000
08:28
There is a lot more work we need to do with this.
213
493000
3000
08:31
Most of these are candidates.
214
496000
2000
08:33
In the next few years we will confirm them.
215
498000
2000
08:35
But the statistical result
216
500000
2000
08:37
is loud and clear.
217
502000
2000
08:39
And the statistical result is that
218
504000
3000
08:42
planets like our own Earth
219
507000
2000
08:44
are out there.
220
509000
2000
08:46
Our own Milky Way Galaxy is rich in this kind of planets.
221
511000
3000
08:49
So the question is: what do we do next?
222
514000
3000
08:52
Well, first of all, we can study them
223
517000
2000
08:54
now that we know where they are.
224
519000
3000
08:57
And we can find those that we would call habitable,
225
522000
3000
09:00
meaning that they have similar conditions
226
525000
2000
09:02
to the conditions
227
527000
2000
09:04
that we experience here on Earth
228
529000
3000
09:07
and where a lot of complex chemistry can happen.
229
532000
3000
09:10
So, we can even put a number
230
535000
3000
09:13
to how many of those planets
231
538000
2000
09:15
now do we expect our own
232
540000
2000
09:17
Milky Way Galaxy harbors.
233
542000
2000
09:19
And the number, as you might expect,
234
544000
2000
09:21
is pretty staggering.
235
546000
2000
09:23
It's about 100 million such planets.
236
548000
3000
09:26
That's great news. Why?
237
551000
2000
09:28
Because with our own little telescope,
238
553000
2000
09:30
just in the next two years,
239
555000
2000
09:32
we'll be able to identify at least 60 of them.
240
557000
3000
09:35
So that's great because then
241
560000
2000
09:37
we can go and study them --
242
562000
2000
09:39
remotely, of course --
243
564000
2000
09:41
with all the techniques that we already have
244
566000
2000
09:43
tested in the past five years.
245
568000
2000
09:45
We can find what they're made of,
246
570000
2000
09:47
would their atmospheres have water, carbon dioxide, methane.
247
572000
3000
09:50
We know and expect that we'll see that.
248
575000
3000
09:54
That's great, but that is not the whole news.
249
579000
3000
09:57
That's not why I'm here.
250
582000
3000
10:00
Why I'm here is to tell you that the next step
251
585000
3000
10:03
is really the exciting part.
252
588000
3000
10:06
The one that this step
253
591000
2000
10:08
is enabling us to do is coming next.
254
593000
3000
10:11
And here comes biology --
255
596000
2000
10:13
biology, with its basic question,
256
598000
3000
10:16
which still stands unanswered,
257
601000
2000
10:18
which is essentially:
258
603000
2000
10:20
"If there is life on other planets,
259
605000
2000
10:22
do we expect it to be like life on Earth?"
260
607000
3000
10:25
And let me immediately tell you here,
261
610000
2000
10:27
when I say life, I don't mean "dolce vita,"
262
612000
2000
10:29
good life, human life.
263
614000
2000
10:31
I really mean life
264
616000
3000
10:34
on Earth, past and present,
265
619000
2000
10:36
from microbes to us humans,
266
621000
2000
10:38
in its rich molecular diversity,
267
623000
3000
10:41
the way we now understand life on Earth
268
626000
3000
10:44
as being a set of molecules and chemical reactions --
269
629000
3000
10:47
and we call that, collectively, biochemistry,
270
632000
3000
10:50
life as a chemical process,
271
635000
3000
10:53
as a chemical phenomenon.
272
638000
2000
10:55
So the question is:
273
640000
2000
10:57
is that chemical phenomenon universal,
274
642000
3000
11:00
or is it something
275
645000
2000
11:02
which depends on the planet?
276
647000
2000
11:04
Is it like gravity,
277
649000
2000
11:06
which is the same everywhere in the universe,
278
651000
2000
11:08
or there would be all kinds of different biochemistries
279
653000
3000
11:11
wherever we find them?
280
656000
2000
11:13
We need to know what we are looking for
281
658000
3000
11:16
when we try to do that.
282
661000
2000
11:18
And that's a very basic question, which we don't know the answer to,
283
663000
3000
11:21
but which we can try --
284
666000
2000
11:23
and we are trying -- to answer in the lab.
285
668000
2000
11:25
We don't need to go to space
286
670000
2000
11:27
to answer that question.
287
672000
2000
11:29
And so, that's what we are trying to do.
288
674000
2000
11:31
And that's what many people now are trying to do.
289
676000
3000
11:34
And a lot of the good news comes from that part of the bridge
290
679000
3000
11:37
that we are trying to build as well.
291
682000
3000
11:40
So this is one example
292
685000
2000
11:42
that I want to show you here.
293
687000
2000
11:44
When we think of what is necessary
294
689000
2000
11:46
for the phenomenon that we call life,
295
691000
3000
11:49
we think of compartmentalization,
296
694000
3000
11:52
keeping the molecules which are important for life
297
697000
3000
11:55
in a membrane,
298
700000
2000
11:57
isolated from the rest of the environment,
299
702000
2000
11:59
but yet, in an environment in which
300
704000
2000
12:01
they actually could originate together.
301
706000
3000
12:04
And in one of our labs,
302
709000
2000
12:06
Jack Szostak's labs,
303
711000
2000
12:08
it was a series of experiments
304
713000
2000
12:10
in the last four years
305
715000
2000
12:12
that showed that the environments --
306
717000
2000
12:14
which are very common on planets,
307
719000
2000
12:16
on certain types of planets like the Earth,
308
721000
3000
12:19
where you have some liquid water and some clays --
309
724000
3000
12:22
you actually end up with
310
727000
3000
12:25
naturally available molecules
311
730000
2000
12:27
which spontaneously form bubbles.
312
732000
3000
12:30
But those bubbles have membranes
313
735000
3000
12:33
very similar to the membrane of every cell
314
738000
3000
12:36
of every living thing on Earth looks like,
315
741000
3000
12:39
like this.
316
744000
2000
12:41
And they really help molecules,
317
746000
2000
12:43
like nucleic acids, like RNA and DNA,
318
748000
3000
12:46
stay inside, develop,
319
751000
2000
12:48
change, divide
320
753000
2000
12:50
and do some of the processes that we call life.
321
755000
3000
12:53
Now this is just an example
322
758000
2000
12:55
to tell you the pathway
323
760000
2000
12:57
in which we are trying to answer
324
762000
2000
12:59
that bigger question about the universality of the phenomenon.
325
764000
3000
13:03
And in a sense, you can think of that work
326
768000
3000
13:06
that people are starting to do now around the world
327
771000
2000
13:08
as building a bridge,
328
773000
2000
13:10
building a bridge from two sides of the river.
329
775000
3000
13:13
On one hand, on the left bank of the river,
330
778000
3000
13:16
are the people like me who study those planets
331
781000
3000
13:19
and try to define the environments.
332
784000
2000
13:21
We don't want to go blind because there's too many possibilities,
333
786000
3000
13:24
and there is not too much lab,
334
789000
3000
13:27
and there is not enough human time
335
792000
2000
13:29
to actually to do all the experiments.
336
794000
2000
13:31
So that's what we are building from the left side of the river.
337
796000
3000
13:34
From the right bank of the river
338
799000
2000
13:36
are the experiments in the lab that I just showed you,
339
801000
3000
13:39
where we actually tried that, and it feeds back and forth,
340
804000
3000
13:42
and we hope to meet in the middle one day.
341
807000
3000
13:45
So why should you care about that?
342
810000
3000
13:48
Why am I trying to sell you
343
813000
2000
13:50
a half-built bridge?
344
815000
2000
13:52
Am I that charming?
345
817000
3000
13:55
Well, there are many reasons,
346
820000
2000
13:57
and you heard some of them
347
822000
2000
13:59
in the short talk today.
348
824000
2000
14:01
This understanding of chemistry
349
826000
2000
14:03
actually can help us
350
828000
2000
14:05
with our daily lives.
351
830000
2000
14:07
But there is something more profound here,
352
832000
2000
14:09
something deeper.
353
834000
2000
14:11
And that deeper, underlying point
354
836000
3000
14:15
is that science
355
840000
2000
14:17
is in the process of redefining life
356
842000
3000
14:20
as we know it.
357
845000
2000
14:22
And that is going to change
358
847000
2000
14:24
our worldview in a profound way --
359
849000
3000
14:27
not in a dissimilar way
360
852000
2000
14:29
as 400 years ago,
361
854000
2000
14:31
Copernicus' act did,
362
856000
2000
14:33
by changing the way
363
858000
2000
14:35
we view space and time.
364
860000
2000
14:37
Now it's about something else,
365
862000
2000
14:39
but it's equally profound.
366
864000
2000
14:41
And half the time,
367
866000
2000
14:43
what's happened
368
868000
2000
14:45
is it's related this kind of
369
870000
2000
14:47
sense of insignificance
370
872000
2000
14:49
to humankind,
371
874000
2000
14:51
to the Earth in a bigger space.
372
876000
2000
14:53
And the more we learn,
373
878000
3000
14:56
the more that was reinforced.
374
881000
3000
14:59
You've all learned that in school --
375
884000
2000
15:01
how small the Earth is
376
886000
2000
15:03
compared to the immense universe.
377
888000
2000
15:05
And the bigger the telescope,
378
890000
2000
15:07
the bigger that universe becomes.
379
892000
2000
15:09
And look at this image of the tiny, blue dot.
380
894000
3000
15:12
This pixel is the Earth.
381
897000
2000
15:14
It is the Earth as we know it.
382
899000
2000
15:16
It is seen from, in this case,
383
901000
2000
15:18
from outside the orbit of Saturn.
384
903000
3000
15:21
But it's really tiny.
385
906000
2000
15:23
We know that.
386
908000
2000
15:25
Let's think of life as that entire planet
387
910000
2000
15:27
because, in a sense, it is.
388
912000
2000
15:29
The biosphere is the size of the Earth.
389
914000
2000
15:31
Life on Earth
390
916000
2000
15:33
is the size of the Earth.
391
918000
2000
15:35
And let's compare it to the rest of the world
392
920000
3000
15:38
in spatial terms.
393
923000
2000
15:40
What if that
394
925000
2000
15:42
Copernican insignificance
395
927000
3000
15:45
was actually all wrong?
396
930000
2000
15:47
Would that make us more responsible
397
932000
2000
15:49
for what is happening today?
398
934000
2000
15:51
Let's actually try that.
399
936000
2000
15:53
So in space, the Earth is very small.
400
938000
3000
15:56
Can you imagine how small it is?
401
941000
2000
15:58
Let me try it.
402
943000
2000
16:00
Okay, let's say
403
945000
2000
16:02
this is the size
404
947000
2000
16:04
of the observable universe,
405
949000
2000
16:06
with all the galaxies,
406
951000
2000
16:08
with all the stars,
407
953000
2000
16:10
okay, from here to here.
408
955000
2000
16:12
Do you know what the size of life
409
957000
2000
16:14
in this necktie will be?
410
959000
3000
16:17
It will be the size
411
962000
3000
16:20
of a single, small atom.
412
965000
2000
16:22
It is unimaginably small.
413
967000
2000
16:24
We can't imagine it.
414
969000
2000
16:26
I mean look, you can see the necktie,
415
971000
2000
16:28
but you can't even imagine seeing
416
973000
2000
16:30
the size of a little, small atom.
417
975000
3000
16:33
But that's not the whole story, you see.
418
978000
3000
16:36
The universe and life
419
981000
2000
16:38
are both in space and time.
420
983000
3000
16:41
If that was
421
986000
3000
16:44
the age of the universe,
422
989000
2000
16:46
then this is the age of life on Earth.
423
991000
3000
16:50
Think about those oldest living things on Earth,
424
995000
3000
16:53
but in a cosmic proportion.
425
998000
2000
16:55
This is not insignificant.
426
1000000
3000
16:58
This is very significant.
427
1003000
2000
17:00
So life might be insignificant in size,
428
1005000
3000
17:03
but it is not insignificant in time.
429
1008000
3000
17:07
Life and the universe
430
1012000
2000
17:09
compare to each other like a child and a parent,
431
1014000
3000
17:12
parent and offspring.
432
1017000
2000
17:14
So what does this tell us?
433
1019000
2000
17:16
This tells us that
434
1021000
2000
17:18
that insignificance paradigm
435
1023000
2000
17:20
that we somehow got to learn
436
1025000
2000
17:22
from the Copernican principle,
437
1027000
2000
17:24
it's all wrong.
438
1029000
2000
17:26
There is immense, powerful potential
439
1031000
3000
17:29
in life in this universe --
440
1034000
2000
17:31
especially now that we know
441
1036000
2000
17:33
that places like the Earth are common.
442
1038000
3000
17:37
And that potential, that powerful potential,
443
1042000
3000
17:40
is also our potential,
444
1045000
2000
17:42
of you and me.
445
1047000
2000
17:44
And if we are to be stewards
446
1049000
2000
17:46
of our planet Earth
447
1051000
2000
17:48
and its biosphere,
448
1053000
2000
17:50
we'd better understand
449
1055000
2000
17:52
the cosmic significance
450
1057000
2000
17:54
and do something about it.
451
1059000
2000
17:56
And the good news is we can
452
1061000
2000
17:58
actually, indeed do it.
453
1063000
2000
18:00
And let's do it.
454
1065000
2000
18:02
Let's start this new revolution
455
1067000
2000
18:04
at the tail end of the old one,
456
1069000
3000
18:07
with synthetic biology being
457
1072000
2000
18:09
the way to transform
458
1074000
2000
18:11
both our environment
459
1076000
2000
18:13
and our future.
460
1078000
2000
18:15
And let's hope that we can build this bridge together
461
1080000
2000
18:17
and meet in the middle.
462
1082000
2000
18:19
Thank you very much.
463
1084000
2000
18:21
(Applause)
464
1086000
3000

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Dimitar Sasselov - Astronomer
Dimitar Sasselov works on uniting the physical and life sciences in the hunt for answers to the question of how life began.

Why you should listen

Dimitar Sasselov is an astronomer who explores the interaction between light and matter. He studies, among other things, extrasolar planets, and he's a co-investigator on NASA's Kepler mission, which is monitoring 100,000 stars in a three-year hunt for exoplanets -- including Jupiter-sized giants. Sasselov watches for exoplanets by looking for transits, the act of a planet passing across the face of its star, dimming its light and changing its chemical signature. This simple, elegant way of searching has led to a bounty of newly discovered planets.

Sasselov is the director of Harvard's Origins of Life Initiative, a new interdisciplinary institute that joins biologists, chemists and astronomers in searching for the starting points of life on Earth (and possibly elsewhere). What is an astronomer doing looking for the origins of life, a question more often asked by biologists? Sasselov suggests that planetary conditions are the seedbed of life; knowing the composition and conditions of a planet will give us clues, perhaps, as to how life might form there. And as we discover new planets that might host life, having a working definition of life will help us screen for possible new forms of it. Other institute members such as biologist George Church and chemist George Whitesides work on the question from other angles, looking for (and building) alternative biologies that might fit conditions elsewhere in the universe.

More profile about the speaker
Dimitar Sasselov | Speaker | TED.com