ABOUT THE SPEAKER
David Burkus - Management researcher
David Burkus challenges the traditional and widely accepted principles of business management.

Why you should listen

David Burkus is an author, podcaster and associate professor of management at Oral Roberts University. His latest book, Under New Management, challenges traditional principles of business management and argues that many of them are outdated, outmoded or simply don't work -- and reveals what does. He is also the author of The Myths of Creativity: The Truth About How Innovative Companies and People Generate Great Ideas.

Burkus is a regular contributor to Harvard Business Review and Inc. magazine. His work has been featured in Fast Company, the Financial Times, Bloomberg BusinessWeek and "CBS This Morning." He's also the host of the award-winning podcast Radio Free Leader.

When he's not speaking or writing, Burkus is in the classroom. At Oral Roberts University, he teaches courses on organizational behavior, creativity and innovation, and strategic leadership. He serves on the advisory board of Fuse Corps, a nonprofit dedicated to making transformative and replicable change in local government.

Burkus lives in Tulsa with his wife and their two boys.

More profile about the speaker
David Burkus | Speaker | TED.com
TEDxUniversityofNevada

David Burkus: Why you should know how much your coworkers get paid

大衛·布爾庫斯: 為什麼你應該知道你的同事得到多少薪水

Filmed:
2,056,498 views

你得到多少薪資? 你的薪資與你工作的人比較怎麼樣? 你應該知道,他們也應該知道,管理研究員大衛·布爾庫斯說。 在這次演講中,布爾庫斯質疑我們關於保持薪水秘密的文化假設,並提出一個令人信服的案例,為什麼分享它們可以使員工,組織和社會受益。
- Management researcher
David Burkus challenges the traditional and widely accepted principles of business management. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:13
How much do you get paid支付?
0
1178
1412
你有多少薪水?
00:15
Don't answer回答 that out loud.
1
3155
1888
不必大聲回答。
00:17
But put a number in your head.
2
5666
1781
但在腦中想一下。
00:20
Now: How much do you think the person
sitting坐在 next下一個 to you gets得到 paid支付?
3
8017
4643
現在,你認為坐在你旁邊的這個人
有多少薪水?
00:25
Again, don't answer回答 out loud.
4
13176
2159
同樣地,不必大聲講出來。
00:27
(Laughter笑聲)
5
15359
1102
(笑聲)
00:29
At work, how much do you think
6
17144
2358
在你的工作中,你認為多少薪水,
00:31
the person sitting坐在 in the cubicle
or the desk next下一個 to you gets得到 paid支付?
7
19526
3938
是坐在隔壁裡的人
或者你隔壁桌的人應該要得到的?
00:35
Do you know?
8
23488
1155
你知道嗎?
00:36
Should you know?
9
24977
1365
你應該知道嗎?
00:38
Notice注意, it's a little uncomfortable不舒服 for me
to even ask you those questions問題.
10
26961
3977
注意,問你這些問題甚至都
讓我有點不舒服。
00:42
But admit承認 it -- you kind of want to know.
11
30962
3150
但不得不承認你想知道。
00:46
Most of us are uncomfortable不舒服 with the idea理念
of broadcasting廣播 our salary薪水.
12
34993
3525
我們大多數人對說出我們的薪水
這個想法感到不舒服。
00:50
We're not supposed應該 to tell our neighbors鄰居,
13
38542
2149
我們不應該告訴鄰居,
00:52
and we're definitely無疑 not supposed應該
to tell our office辦公室 neighbors鄰居.
14
40715
3192
我們也絕對不應該
告訴我們的同事。
00:55
The assumed假定 reason原因 is that if everybody每個人
knew知道 what everybody每個人 got paid支付,
15
43931
3514
假設的原因是如果大家
互相知道誰得了多少薪水,
00:59
then all hell地獄 would break打破 loose疏鬆.
16
47469
1790
那麼就會天下大亂。
01:01
There'd這紅色 be arguments參數, there'd這紅色 be fights打架,
17
49283
2101
会有爭論与戰鬥,
01:03
there might威力 even be a few少數 people who quit放棄.
18
51408
2189
甚至可能有幾個人辭職。
01:05
But what if secrecy保密 is actually其實
the reason原因 for all that strife爭吵?
19
53621
3779
但如果實際上保密是
所有的爭鬥的原因會如何?
01:09
And what would happen發生
if we removed去除 that secrecy保密?
20
57424
2618
如果我們去除那個
保密的潛規則又會發生什麼?
01:12
What if openness透明度 actually其實 increased增加
the sense of fairness公平 and collaboration合作
21
60599
3991
如果實際上在一個公司裡,
開放可以讓人覺得公平和協作
01:16
inside a company公司?
22
64614
1222
又會如何?
01:17
What would happen發生 if we had
total pay工資 transparency透明度?
23
65860
3586
如果我們將薪資透明化
會發生什麼?
01:22
For the past過去 several一些 years年份,
24
70254
1317
過去幾年,
01:23
I've been studying研究 the corporate企業
and entrepreneurial創業 leaders領導者
25
71595
2913
我研究了公司和創業領袖
01:26
who question the conventional常規 wisdom智慧
about how to run a company公司.
26
74532
3549
關於如何運作一個公司的共同看法。
01:30
And the question of pay工資 keeps保持 coming未來 up.
27
78105
2452
薪水的問題不斷出現,
01:33
And the answers答案 keep surprising奇怪.
28
81105
2450
但是他們的回答一直很讓人驚奇。
01:36
It turns out that pay工資 transparency透明度 --
29
84458
1807
事實證明,公開工資,
01:38
sharing分享 salaries工資 openly公然
across橫過 a company公司 --
30
86289
2110
跨公司分享工資資料,
01:40
makes品牌 for a better workplace職場
for both the employee僱員
31
88423
2649
能為每位員工還有組織
01:43
and for the organization組織.
32
91096
1587
製造一個更好的工作環境。
01:45
When people don't know how their pay工資
compares比較 to their peers'同行“,
33
93362
3099
當人們不知道相比於同齡人
他們的薪水情況如何,
01:48
they're more likely容易 to feel underpaid少繳
34
96485
1816
他們更有可能
覺得自己的薪水太少,
01:50
and maybe even discriminated歧視 against反對.
35
98325
1935
甚至可能感到受到歧視。
01:52
Do you want to work at a place地點
that tolerates容忍 the idea理念
36
100646
2575
你想在一個容忍這個想法的地方工作嗎?
01:55
that you feel underpaid少繳
or discriminated歧視 against反對?
37
103245
2804
你覺得太少 或歧視?
01:58
But keeping保持 salaries工資 secret秘密
does exactly究竟 that,
38
106697
2510
但保持薪水秘密就是這樣,
02:01
and it's a practice實踐
as old as it is common共同,
39
109231
2883
這是一種很普通的做法,
02:04
despite儘管 the fact事實
that in the United聯合的 States狀態,
40
112674
2092
儘管事實在美國,
02:06
the law protects保護 an employee's僱員 right
to discuss討論 their pay工資.
41
114790
3450
法律保障一位員工討論薪水的權益。
02:11
In one famous著名 example from decades幾十年 ago,
42
119417
2558
在幾十年前的一個著名例子中,
02:13
the management管理 of Vanity虛榮 Fair公平 magazine雜誌
43
121999
2106
Vanity Fair雜誌的管理者,
02:16
actually其實 circulated流傳 a memo備忘錄 entitled標題:
44
124129
2120
實際上分發了一份備忘錄,題為:
02:18
"Forbidding森嚴 Discussion討論 Among其中
Employees僱員 of Salary薪水 Received收到."
45
126273
3205
“禁忌的討論”
02:21
"Forbidding森嚴" discussion討論 among其中
employees僱員 of salary薪水 received收到.
46
129502
3322
其中禁止討論員工的薪資。
02:25
Now that memo備忘錄 didn't sit well
with everybody每個人.
47
133482
2147
現在大家沒有攜帶備忘錄。
紐約媒體指出,
Dorothy Parker。
02:27
New York紐約 literary figures人物
Dorothy多蘿西 Parker帕克,
48
135653
2046
02:29
Robert羅伯特 Benchley奇利 and Robert羅伯特 Sherwood舍伍德,
49
137723
1762
Robert Benchley,
Robert Sherwood,
02:31
all writers作家 in the Algonquin阿岡昆 Round回合 Table,
50
139509
2441
還有在Algonquin Round Table的作家,
02:33
decided決定 to stand up for transparency透明度
51
141974
1781
決定堅持薪資透明。
02:35
and showed顯示 up for work the next下一個 day
52
143779
1732
並在第二天現身工作时
02:37
with their salary薪水 written書面 on signs跡象
hanging from their neck頸部.
53
145535
3214
将他們的薪水寫在
掛在他們脖子的工資牌上。
02:40
(Laughter笑聲)
54
148773
1548
(笑聲)
02:42
Imagine想像 showing展示 up for work
55
150716
1575
想像現身工作时
02:44
with your salary薪水 just written書面
across橫過 your chest胸部 for all to see.
56
152315
3490
你的薪水寫在牌子上,
讓所有人都看到。
02:49
But why would a company公司 even want
to discourage不鼓勵 salary薪水 discussions討論?
57
157573
3270
但是為什麼公司會想要
以阻止工資討論?
02:52
Why do some people go along沿 with it,
while others其他 revolt反叛 against反對 it?
58
160867
3332
為什麼有些人喜歡它,
而其他人反對它?
02:57
It turns out that in addition加成
to the assumed假定 reasons原因,
59
165906
3044
事實證明一种假設的原因,
03:00
pay工資 secrecy保密 is actually其實 a way
to save保存 a lot of money.
60
168974
3303
是因為工資保密其實是一種
節省很多錢的方式。
03:04
You see, keeping保持 salaries工資 secret秘密
61
172301
1911
你看,保持薪資秘密,
03:06
leads引線 to what economists經濟學家 call
"information信息 asymmetry不對稱."
62
174236
2951
導致經濟學家所說的
“信息不對稱”。
03:09
This is a situation情況 where,
in a negotiation談判,
63
177211
2271
在這情況談判的雙方
03:11
one party派對 has loads負載 more
information信息 than the other.
64
179506
2998
一方比一方有更多資訊。
03:14
And in hiring招聘 or promotion提升
or annual全年 raise提高 discussions討論,
65
182887
3410
在招聘、升職、加薪的討論中,
03:18
an employer雇主 can use that secrecy保密
to save保存 a lot of money.
66
186321
3658
雇主可以使用這種保密方式
節省很多錢。
03:22
Imagine想像 how much better
you could negotiate談判 for a raise提高
67
190518
2624
想像一下如果你知道每個人的薪資,
03:25
if you knew知道 everybody's每個人的 salary薪水.
68
193166
1807
你会要到多少加薪。
03:29
Economists經濟學家 warn警告 that information信息 asymmetry不對稱
69
197612
2441
經濟學家警告說信息不對稱
03:32
can cause原因 markets市場 to go awry.
70
200077
1647
可能會導致市場出差錯。
03:33
Someone有人 leaves樹葉 a pay工資 stub存根 on the copier複印機,
71
201748
1906
有人在印表機上不小心遺留一張工資表,
03:35
and suddenly突然 everybody每個人
is shouting叫喊 at each other.
72
203678
2418
然後大家突然互相喊叫。
03:38
In fact事實, they even warn警告
73
206866
1706
事實上,他們互相警告:
03:40
that information信息 asymmetry不對稱
can lead to a total market市場 failure失敗.
74
208596
4817
信息不對稱
可能導致整個市場失靈。
03:46
And I think we're almost幾乎 there.
75
214095
2014
我認為我們正處在這個邊緣。
03:48
Here's這裡的 why:
76
216133
1166
這就是為甚麼:
03:49
first, most employees僱員 have no idea理念
how their pay工資 compares比較 to their peers'同行“.
77
217323
4928
第一,大多數的員工沒有
比較他們的薪資的想法。
03:54
In a 2015 survey調查 of 70,000 employees僱員,
78
222834
3850
在2015年對70,000名員工的調查中,
03:58
two-thirds三分之二 of everyone大家 who is paid支付
at the market市場 rate
79
226708
3381
三分之二的人按市場利率付費的員工
04:02
said that they felt they were underpaid少繳.
80
230113
2232
表示他們覺得自己工資不高。
04:05
And of everybody每個人 who felt
that they were underpaid少繳,
81
233036
2879
對於所有感覺到
自己沒有得到足夠薪水的人,
04:07
60 percent百分 said
that they intended to quit放棄,
82
235939
2953
60%的打算辭職,
04:10
regardless而不管 of where they were --
underpaid少繳, overpaid買貴了
83
238916
2888
不管他們的實際工資 -
是少付,是多付
04:13
or right at the market市場 rate.
84
241828
1579
或是隨著市場利率變動。
04:16
If you were part部分 of this survey調查,
what would you say?
85
244200
2460
如果你是這調查的一部分
,你會說甚麼?
04:18
Are you underpaid少繳?
86
246684
1276
你會感到不舒服嗎?
04:19
Well, wait -- how do you even know,
87
247984
2325
等一下-你如何知道?
04:22
because you're not allowed允許
to talk about it?
88
250333
2133
因為你不被允許談論這話題?
04:24
Next下一個, information信息 asymmetry不對稱, pay工資 secrecy保密,
89
252911
3599
其次,信息不對稱,工資保密,
04:28
makes品牌 it easier更輕鬆 to ignore忽視
the discrimination區別
90
256534
2779
使其更容易忽略或歧視
04:31
that's already已經 present當下
in the market市場 today今天.
91
259337
2467
已經存在於現在的市場中。
04:34
In a 2011 report報告 from the Institute研究所
for Women's女士的 Policy政策 Research研究,
92
262217
3697
2011年,一项研究所的
婦女政策的報告指出,
04:37
the gender性別 wage工資 gap間隙
between之間 men男人 and women婦女
93
265938
2124
男人和女人之間的工資差距
04:40
was 23 percent百分.
94
268086
1738
有23℅。
04:42
This is where that 77 cents
on the dollar美元 comes from.
95
270451
2619
這就是一美元与77美分的出处。
04:45
But in the Federal聯邦 Government政府,
96
273641
1463
但是在聯邦政府,
04:47
where salaries工資 are pinned固定
to certain某些 levels水平
97
275128
2063
固定薪水一定是處於水平值,
04:49
and everybody每個人 knows知道
what those levels水平 are,
98
277215
2040
然後大家都知道這些水平值。
04:51
the gender性別 wage工資 gap間隙
shrinks收縮 to 11 percent百分 --
99
279279
2085
性別工資差距则收縮至11%。
04:53
and this is before controlling控制
for any of the factors因素
100
281388
2576
這沒有控制其他變數,
04:55
that economists經濟學家 argue爭論 over
whether是否 or not to control控制 for.
101
283988
2893
而經濟學家爭論是否應當控制。
04:59
If we really want to close
the gender性別 wage工資 gap間隙,
102
287264
2672
如果我們真的想減少
性別工資差距,
05:01
maybe we should start開始
by opening開盤 up the payroll工資表.
103
289960
2488
或許我們應該從公佈工資開始。
05:04
If this is what total
market市場 failure失敗 looks容貌 like,
104
292864
3222
如果市場失靈,
05:08
then openness透明度 remains遺跡
the only way to ensure確保 fairness公平.
105
296110
3268
那公開薪資会是確保公平的唯一方法。
05:12
Now, I realize實現 that letting出租 people
know what you make
106
300274
2501
現在,我意識到讓人們
知道你做什麼
05:14
might威力 feel uncomfortable不舒服,
107
302799
1646
可能讓你感到不自在,
05:16
but isn't it less uncomfortable不舒服
108
304469
1515
但不會超過
05:18
than always wondering想知道
if you're being存在 discriminated歧視 against反對,
109
306008
2880
總是想知道
你是否受到歧視,
05:20
or if you wife妻子 or your daughter女兒
or your sister妹妹 is being存在 paid支付 unfairly不公平?
110
308912
3762
或你的妻子或女兒或姐妹
是否被克扣薪水的不自在。
05:25
Openness透明度 remains遺跡 the best最好 way
to ensure確保 fairness公平,
111
313353
3940
公開是確保公平的最佳方法,
05:29
and pay工資 transparency透明度 does that.
112
317317
1913
薪資透明也是其中一種。
05:31
That's why entrepreneurial創業 leaders領導者
and corporate企業 leaders領導者
113
319991
2680
這就是為什么商界領袖和企業領導
05:34
have been experimenting試驗
with sharing分享 salaries工資 for years年份.
114
322695
2793
多年来一直在嘗試公开工資,
05:37
Like Dane戴恩 Atkinson阿特金森.
115
325512
1413
像Dane Atkinson一樣。
05:38
Dane戴恩 is a serial串行 entrepreneur企業家
who started開始 many許多 companies公司
116
326949
3879
Dane是一個開創很多公司的企業家,
05:42
in a pay工資 secrecy保密 condition條件
117
330852
1582
他在薪酬保密狀態下发工資,
05:44
and even used that condition條件
to pay工資 two equally一樣 qualified合格 people
118
332458
3353
甚至對兩個同等資格的人
05:47
dramatically顯著 different不同 salaries工資,
119
335835
1696
开出顯著不同的薪水,
05:49
depending根據 on how well
they could negotiate談判.
120
337555
2169
取决於他們多會談判。
05:52
And Dane戴恩 saw the strife爭吵
that happened發生 as a result結果 of this.
121
340091
3331
Dane看到了結果導致的衝突
05:55
So when he started開始
his newest最新 company公司, SumAllSumAll,
122
343888
2227
所以當他成立SumAll公司,
05:58
he committed提交 to salary薪水 transparency透明度
from the beginning開始.
123
346139
3110
他一開始就把薪資透明化,
06:01
And the results結果 have been amazing驚人.
124
349821
1738
效果比預期的好。
06:04
And in study研究 after study研究,
125
352424
1622
在大量研究中,
06:06
when people know
how they're being存在 paid支付
126
354070
1876
當人們知道他的薪水
06:07
and how that pay工資 compares比較 to their peers'同行“,
127
355970
2029
和同事相比處於什麼水平,
06:10
they're more likely容易 to work hard
to improve提高 their performance性能,
128
358023
2933
他們會更加努力來提升業績,
06:12
more likely容易 to be engaged訂婚,
and they're less likely容易 to quit放棄.
129
360980
2849
更多參與,更少辭職。
06:15
That's why Dane's丹麥人 not alone單獨.
130
363853
1402
這就是為甚麼模仿Dane的人越來越多
06:17
From technology技術 start-ups創業 like Buffer緩衝,
131
365279
2171
從類似 Buffer 的初創科技公司,
06:19
to the tens of thousands數千
of employees僱員 at Whole整個 Foods食品,
132
367915
3346
到有數萬員工的Whole Foods。
06:23
where not only is your salary薪水
available可得到 for everyone大家 to see,
133
371285
3167
不但大家的薪資都透明化,
06:26
but the performance性能 data數據
for the store商店 and for your department
134
374476
3000
且每個分店、每個部門的業績數據,
06:29
is available可得到 on the company公司 intranet內部網
135
377500
1919
可在公司網頁上查得,
06:31
for all to see.
136
379443
1222
供所有人查看。
06:33
Now, pay工資 transparency透明度
takes a lot of forms形式.
137
381985
2462
實際上,薪資透明有很多種方法,
06:36
It's not one size尺寸 fits適合 all.
138
384471
1598
並不是一成不變的。
06:38
Some post崗位 their salaries工資 for all to see.
139
386093
2496
有的公司把薪資向所有人公開,
06:40
Some only keep it inside the company公司.
140
388613
2301
有些只在公司內部公開。
06:42
Some post崗位 the formula for calculating計算 pay工資,
141
390938
2585
一些公开職位薪水的計算公式,
06:45
and others其他 post崗位 the pay工資 levels水平
142
393547
1774
另一些公開薪資分級
06:47
and affix詞綴 everybody每個人 to that level水平.
143
395345
1778
並告知每個人所處的等級。
06:49
So you don't have to make signs跡象
144
397147
2049
所以你不需做薪資牌,
06:51
for all of your employees僱員
to wear穿 around the office辦公室.
145
399220
2524
以便員工在辦公室穿著。
06:53
And you don't have to be
the only one wearing穿著 a sign標誌
146
401768
2914
你也不必是
唯一一個穿著標誌的——
06:56
that you made製作 at home.
147
404706
1222
那是你在家裡做的。
06:58
But we can all take greater更大 steps腳步
towards pay工資 transparency透明度.
148
406494
3204
但我們都可以
更大步地走向薪酬透明。
07:02
For those of you that have the authority權威
149
410233
2028
對於那些有權利
07:04
to move移動 forward前鋒 towards transparency透明度:
150
412285
1794
推動薪資透明化的人:
07:06
it's time to move移動 forward前鋒.
151
414103
1475
是時候向前邁進了。
07:07
And for those of you
that don't have that authority權威:
152
415943
2468
對於沒有那個權力的你們:
07:10
it's time to stand up for your right to.
153
418435
1979
現在是時候為你的權益站出來。
07:13
So how much do you get paid支付?
154
421263
1725
所以你得到多少薪資?
07:16
And how does that compare比較
to the people you work with?
155
424186
2627
跟你的同事比你的薪資如何?
07:19
You should know.
156
427190
1306
你應該知道,
07:21
And so should they.
157
429312
1275
他們也應該。
07:23
Thank you.
158
431936
1168
謝謝你
07:25
(Applause掌聲)
159
433128
3178
(掌聲)
Translated by jim 陳哲民
Reviewed by Hime IX

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
David Burkus - Management researcher
David Burkus challenges the traditional and widely accepted principles of business management.

Why you should listen

David Burkus is an author, podcaster and associate professor of management at Oral Roberts University. His latest book, Under New Management, challenges traditional principles of business management and argues that many of them are outdated, outmoded or simply don't work -- and reveals what does. He is also the author of The Myths of Creativity: The Truth About How Innovative Companies and People Generate Great Ideas.

Burkus is a regular contributor to Harvard Business Review and Inc. magazine. His work has been featured in Fast Company, the Financial Times, Bloomberg BusinessWeek and "CBS This Morning." He's also the host of the award-winning podcast Radio Free Leader.

When he's not speaking or writing, Burkus is in the classroom. At Oral Roberts University, he teaches courses on organizational behavior, creativity and innovation, and strategic leadership. He serves on the advisory board of Fuse Corps, a nonprofit dedicated to making transformative and replicable change in local government.

Burkus lives in Tulsa with his wife and their two boys.

More profile about the speaker
David Burkus | Speaker | TED.com