Emily F. Rothman: How porn changes the way teens think about sex
Boston University professor Emily F. Rothman is a leading public health scholar on sexually explicit media and its impact on adolescent dating relationships. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
have been wanting to know for years.
is mention the word pornography.
full of high school students
an after-school program in Boston.
about how exciting it would be
were glazing over,
my cool outfit that day.
who worked for the program said,
about pornography?
full of high school students exploded
loud hooting noises.
was say that one word -- pornography.
an important turning point
of finding solutions
for more than a decade
of dating violence.
for Disease Control and Prevention
high school-attending youth
for novel answers to the question:
and how do we stop it?
that we were working on at the time
a few questions about pornography.
was emerging from our findings.
girls in our sample
forced or threatened
the perpetrator saw in pornography.
for any percentage of dating violence?
that the pornography users
to be in unhealthy relationships?
everything that I could
youth were watching,
that for so many of them
were apparently unhealthy.
plenty of members of the public
their mind about the issue.
about pornography?
call sex-positive.
I fully support people's right
and sexuality they find fulfilling,
the enthusiastic consent
towards watching pornography.
do anything for me.
soon-to-be teenage children,
could do to them.
there were a lot of people
who were staunch defenders of it
or was it good for you?
that emerged clearly.
that had me really worried,
who saw pornography
to perpetrate sexual violence.
causal conclusions.
that did not find
negative outcomes.
that did find that.
to pick a side about pornography.
it was weak-minded of me
correct answer about pornography.
off of audience's fascination
not just having sex,
over and over during sex,
that we have a serious problem
and rape in this country,
isn't helping with any of that.
problem to me was that
had been used as a pretext
against gays and lesbians
the messages that pornography is sending,
about going overboard indicting it.
horrifying claim that I could find
at which people first see pornography,
or their sexuality.
are most likely to see,
of sex education.
instantly poisoning their minds
would have you believe.
some pornography in their youth.
and 62 percent of females
pornography ubiquitous,
that any young child
is definitely going to see pornography,
found that in the year 2000
pornography in the past year.
and sexual violence perpetration
are more likely to see sexualized images
besides pornography.
sexualized video games,
to a steady stream of violent media
the sexualized images
of pornography alone,
from bigger issues.
of dating and sexual violence,
are turning to pornography
information elsewhere.
in the United States
be taught in schools,
be medically accurate.
to talk about sex,
to talk about pornography.
to talk about dating or sexual violence.
that we might normally talk about
relationships education,
of sexual consent?
if you're hurting somebody during sex?
when you're flirting?
as the jumping-off point
give kids a desert like brownies,
or something healthy inside of it.
about the healthy stuff,
that was about something
they wanted to be talking about.
set out to find,
to have a conversation with teenagers
in the studies that have been conducted.
to become critical consumers
with adolescent development.
to think for themselves.
respect and pornography,
into a particular point of view
down their throat about pornography
the kind of respectful,
that we want them to learn.
pornography literacy,
about pornography
an ever-changing evidence base.
a nine-session, 18-hour class
that we're sitting kids down
how to watch pornography,
an anti-pornography activist group
that if they ever saw pornography,
worst thing for their health ever.
is that we're nonjudgmental.
should be watching pornography.
to become critical thinkers
for our curriculum and our training,
and a lot of teachers
these more nuanced
with teenagers about pornography.
we mentioned the word pornography,
to jump in to a back-and-forth
and didn't want to see in pornography,
and didn't want to do during sex.
really sophisticated points.
we would want them to be talking about
the class one day and think,
that one boy in our class
have orgasms from anal sex."
the next week and think,
that one kid in our class who's gay,
represented in pornography
a lot better about her body,
as the object of desire
as a violence prevention activist.
and researching pornography.
were all one way or the other,
with teenagers about pornography
in these conversations
to grapple with the complexities.
about the science.
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Emily Rothman - Public health researcherBoston University professor Emily F. Rothman is a leading public health scholar on sexually explicit media and its impact on adolescent dating relationships.
Why you should listen
Emily F. Rothman has conducted multiple research studies with teenage participants to identify what they view, when, why and how it may affect them. She also co-designed and co-taught the first course on pornography at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and partnered with the Boston Public Health Commission to create a "pornography literacy curriculum" for teenagers. Rothman has led several federally-funded research projects sponsored by the NIH, the National Institute of Justice and various foundations in an effort to help identify causes and consequences of adolescent dating aggression, sexual assault and human trafficking. She also founded and served as Chair of the Violence and Trauma special interest group at the Society for Behavioral Medicine, authored a report on batterer intervention programs for the World Health Organization and is an appointed member of the Massachusetts Governor's Council on Sexual and Domestic Violence.
Emily Rothman | Speaker | TED.com