ABOUT THE SPEAKER
J. Marshall Shepherd - Meteorologist
Dr. J. Marshall Shepherd is a leading international expert in weather and climate and is the Georgia Athletic Association Distinguished Professor of Geography and Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Georgia.

Why you should listen

Dr. J. Marshall Shepherd was the 2013 President of American Meteorological Society (AMS), the nation's largest and oldest professional/science society in the atmospheric and related sciences. He serves as Director of the University of Georgia's (UGA) Atmospheric Sciences Program and Full Professor in the Department of Geography where he is Associate Department Head.

Shepherd is also the host of The Weather Channel’s Weather Geeks, a pioneering Sunday talk show dedicated to science, and he is a contributor to Forbes Magazine. Dr. Shepherd routinely appears on national media outlets like CNN, The Weather Channel, CBS's Face The Nation and more. He also provides expertise to NASA, NOAA, The White House, Congress and other stakeholders.

More profile about the speaker
J. Marshall Shepherd | Speaker | TED.com
TEDxUGA

J. Marshall Shepherd: 3 kinds of bias that shape your worldview

J. 馬歇爾薛佛: 影響你世界觀的三種偏見

Filmed:
2,252,877 views

我們對於科學的認知(和錯誤認知)是怎麼來的?在這場讓人開眼界的演說中,氣象學家 J. 馬歇爾薛佛解釋確認偏誤、達克效應,和認知失調如何影響我們自己認為的已知。他也談到拓展科學半徑,如何用更強大的知識來取代錯誤的認知。
- Meteorologist
Dr. J. Marshall Shepherd is a leading international expert in weather and climate and is the Georgia Athletic Association Distinguished Professor of Geography and Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Georgia. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

從學位上來看,我是氣象學家,
00:12
I'm a meteorologist氣象 by degree,
0
952
1762
00:14
I have a bachelor's本科,
master's碩士 and PhD博士 in physical物理 meteorology氣象,
1
2738
3143
我有物理氣象學的
學士、碩士、博士學位,
00:17
so I'm a meteorologist氣象, card carrying攜帶.
2
5905
2136
所以我是氣象學家,有認證的。
00:20
And so with that comes
four questions問題, always.
3
8444
4699
這總是會伴隨著四個問題。
00:25
This is one prediction預測
I will always get right.
4
13167
2556
我的這項預測是最準的。
00:27
(Laughter笑聲)
5
15747
1856
(笑聲)
00:29
And those questions問題 are,
6
17627
2048
那幾個問題是:
00:31
"Marshall馬歇爾, what channel渠道 are you on?"
7
19699
2484
「馬歇爾,你在哪一台播氣象?」
00:34
(Laughter笑聲)
8
22207
1817
(笑聲)
00:36
"Dr博士. Shepherd牧羊人, what's the weather天氣
going to be tomorrow明天?"
9
24048
2841
「薛佛博士,明天的天氣如何?」
(笑聲)
00:38
(Laughter笑聲)
10
26913
1000
00:39
And oh, I love this one:
11
27937
1587
喔,我很愛這一個:
00:41
"My daughter女兒 is getting得到 married已婚
next下一個 September九月, it's an outdoor戶外 wedding婚禮.
12
29548
3445
「我女兒明年九月要結婚,
是戶外婚禮。到時會下雨嗎?」
00:45
Is it going to rain?"
13
33017
1210
(笑聲)
00:46
(Laughter笑聲)
14
34251
1382
00:47
Not kidding開玩笑, I get those,
and I don't know the answer回答 to that,
15
35657
2905
不是開玩笑的,我會被問
這些問題,但我沒有答案,
00:50
the science科學 isn't there.
16
38586
1600
那沒有科學。
00:53
But the one I get a lot these days is,
17
41185
2903
但最近我最常被問的是這個:
00:56
"Dr博士. Shepherd牧羊人, do you believe
in climate氣候 change更改?"
18
44112
4852
「薛佛博士,你相信
氣候變遷嗎?」
01:01
"Do you believe in global全球 warming變暖?"
19
49331
2706
「你相信全球暖化嗎?」
01:04
Now, I have to gather收集 myself
every一切 time I get that question.
20
52807
3699
每當我被問那個問題時,
我就得打起精神。
01:08
Because it's an ill-posed擺在不恰當的 question --
21
56530
1762
因為這是個不適定的問題——
科學並不是個信念系統。
01:10
science科學 isn't a belief信仰 system系統.
22
58316
2000
01:12
My son兒子, he's 10 --
he believes相信 in the tooth fairy仙女.
23
60911
3266
我的兒子十歲——他相信
有牙仙(會把牙齒換成金幣)。
01:16
And he needs需求 to get over that,
because I'm losing失去 dollars美元, fast快速.
24
64998
3389
他最好快點度過這段時期,
因為我虧錢虧得很快。
01:20
(Laughter笑聲)
25
68411
2317
(笑聲)
01:22
But he believes相信 in the tooth fairy仙女.
26
70752
1825
但他相信有牙仙。
01:24
But consider考慮 this.
27
72601
1971
但,想想這一點。
01:27
Bank銀行 of America美國 building建造,
there, in Atlanta亞特蘭大.
28
75361
2548
美國銀行大樓,位在亞特蘭大。
01:29
You never hear anyone任何人 say,
29
77933
2555
你從來不會聽到有人說:
01:32
"Do you believe, if you go
to the top最佳 of that building建造
30
80512
2579
「你信不信,如果到
那棟大樓的樓頂,
01:35
and throw a ball off, it's going to fall秋季?"
31
83115
2254
把一顆球丟出去,
它就會向下落?」
01:37
You never hear that,
because gravity重力 is a thing.
32
85807
3334
你從來沒有聽過,
因為重力是客觀存在。
01:42
So why don't we hear the question,
33
90427
2285
所以我們不會聽到這個問題:
01:44
"Do you believe in gravity重力?"
34
92736
1805
「你相信重力嗎?」
01:46
But of course課程, we hear the question,
35
94565
1858
但,當然,我們會聽到這個問題:
01:48
"Do you believe in global全球 warming變暖?"
36
96447
2333
「你相信全球暖化嗎?」
01:52
Well, consider考慮 these facts事實.
37
100161
2412
想想看這些事實。
01:55
The American美國 Association協會
for the Advancement進步 of Science科學, AAASAaas,
38
103799
3096
美國科學促進會,
縮寫 AAAS,
01:58
one of the leading領導
organizations組織 in science科學,
39
106919
2849
是科學界最重要的組織之一,
02:01
queried查詢 scientists科學家們 and the public上市
on different不同 science科學 topics主題.
40
109792
3920
詢問科學家和大眾
各種不同的科學主題。
02:05
Here are some of them:
41
113736
1199
以下是其中一些:基因改造食物、
02:06
genetically基因 modified改性 food餐飲,
animal動物 research研究, human人的 evolution演化.
42
114959
3927
動物研究、人類演化。
02:11
And look at what the scientists科學家們
say about those,
43
119709
2500
看看科學家們對這些主題的說法,
02:14
the people that actually其實
study研究 those topics主題, in red,
44
122233
2714
真正在研究那些
主題的人是紅色的,
02:16
versus the gray灰色, what the public上市 thinks.
45
124971
2627
相對的,灰色是大眾的想法。
02:19
How did we get there?
46
127622
1586
我們是怎麼走到這一步的?
02:21
How did we get there?
47
129982
1492
我們是怎麼走到這一步的?
02:24
That scientists科學家們 and the public上市
are so far apart距離 on these science科學 issues問題.
48
132743
3901
在這些科學議題上,
科學家和大眾的認知差好多。
02:29
Well, I'll come a little bit
closer接近 to home for me,
49
137260
2396
我挑個我比較熟悉的主題來談:
02:31
climate氣候 change更改.
50
139680
1150
氣候變遷。
02:33
Eighty-seven87個 percent百分 of scientists科學家們
51
141339
2892
87% 的科學家
02:36
believe that humans人類 are contributing貢獻
to climate氣候 change更改.
52
144255
4208
相信人類造成了氣候變遷。
02:41
But only 50 percent百分 of the public上市?
53
149450
2267
但只有 50% 的民眾這麼想?
我們是怎麼走到這一步的?
02:45
How did we get there?
54
153323
1381
02:46
So it begs乞求 the question,
55
154728
1303
這就帶出了一個問題:
02:48
what shapes形狀 perceptions看法 about science科學?
56
156055
4737
關於科學的認知,是怎麼來的?
02:54
It's an interesting有趣 question
57
162655
1390
這是個很有意思的問題,
我花了不少時間在思考它。
02:56
and one that I've been
thinking思維 about quite相當 a bit.
58
164069
2578
03:00
I think that one thing that shapes形狀
perceptions看法 in the public上市, about science科學,
59
168434
4666
我認為,大眾對於科學的認知,
是由信念系統和偏見所形塑的。
03:05
is belief信仰 systems系統 and biases偏見.
60
173124
2190
03:08
Belief信仰 systems系統 and biases偏見.
61
176339
1436
信念系統和偏見。
03:09
Go with me for a moment時刻.
62
177799
1600
耐心聽我說一下。
03:12
Because I want to talk
about three elements分子 of that:
63
180005
2453
因為我想要談它的三項元素:
確認偏誤、
03:14
confirmation確認 bias偏壓, Dunning-Kruger鄧甯-克魯格 effect影響
64
182482
3673
達克效應,
03:18
and cognitive認知 dissonance不和諧.
65
186179
1865
以及認知失調。
03:20
Now, these sound聲音 like big, fancy幻想,
academic學術的 terms條款, and they are.
66
188068
4023
這些聽起來是很博大、
很炫的學術名詞,的確是的。
03:24
But when I describe描述 them,
you're going to be like, "Oh!
67
192585
3627
但當我描述它們時,
你們會說類似:「喔!
03:28
I recognize認識 that; I even know
somebody that does that."
68
196236
3733
我知道,我甚至認識
有這種狀況的人。」
03:33
Confirmation確認 bias偏壓.
69
201355
1579
確認偏誤。
03:36
Finding查找 evidence證據 that supports支持
what we already已經 believe.
70
204260
4472
找證據來支持我們已經相信的事。
03:40
Now, we're probably大概 all
a little bit guilty有罪 of that at times.
71
208756
2924
我們可能難免有時
都會有一點確認偏誤。
03:45
Take a look at this.
72
213427
1539
看看這個。
03:46
I'm on Twitter推特.
73
214990
1317
我在推特上。
03:48
And often經常, when it snows下雪,
74
216331
2404
通常,下雪時,
03:50
I'll get this tweet鳴叫 back to me.
75
218759
1889
我會收到這樣的回覆。
03:52
(Laughter笑聲)
76
220672
2476
(笑聲)
03:55
"Hey, Dr博士. Shepherd牧羊人, I have 20 inches英寸
of global全球 warming變暖 in my yard,
77
223172
3729
「嘿,薛佛博士,我的院子裡
有二十英吋的全球暖化,
03:58
what are you guys
talking about, climate氣候 change更改?"
78
226925
2984
你們在說的是什麼?氣候變遷?」
04:01
I get that tweet鳴叫 a lot, actually其實.
79
229933
1738
其實,我常收到這種推特訊息。
04:04
It's a cute可愛 tweet鳴叫,
it makes品牌 me chuckle暗笑 as well.
80
232909
2937
這種訊息很可愛,會讓我咯咯笑。
04:07
But it's oh, so fundamentally從根本上
scientifically科學 flawed有缺陷.
81
235870
3945
但,它在根本上,
有很大的科學瑕疵。
04:12
Because it illustrates說明
82
240292
1558
因為它說明了寫這則
推特訊息的人並不了解
04:13
that the person tweeting啁啾
doesn't understand理解
83
241874
2021
04:15
the difference區別
between之間 weather天氣 and climate氣候.
84
243919
2102
天氣和氣候之間的差別。
04:19
I often經常 say, weather天氣 is your mood心情
85
247466
3548
我常說,天氣是你的心情,
04:23
and climate氣候 is your personality個性.
86
251038
2459
氣候是你的個性。
04:26
Think about that.
87
254981
1151
想想看。天氣是你的心情,
氣候是你的個性。
04:28
Weather天氣 is your mood心情,
climate氣候 is your personality個性.
88
256156
2444
04:30
Your mood心情 today今天 doesn't necessarily一定
tell me anything about your personality個性,
89
258624
3985
你今天的心情不見得
能代表你的個性,
04:34
nor也不 does a cold day tell me anything
about climate氣候 change更改,
90
262633
2770
有一天很冷,並不表示
就有氣候變遷,
04:37
or a hot day, for that matter.
91
265427
2000
有一天很熱也是一樣的。
04:41
Dunning-Kruger鄧甯-克魯格.
92
269974
1150
達克效應。
04:43
Two scholars學者 from Cornell康奈爾
came來了 up with the Dunning-Kruger鄧甯-克魯格 effect影響.
93
271616
3055
康乃爾大學的兩位學者
提出了達克效應。
若你去找相關的同儕審查論文,
04:46
If you go look up
the peer-reviewed同行評審 paper for this,
94
274695
2381
你會看到各式各樣
很炫的專有名詞:
04:49
you will see all kinds
of fancy幻想 terminology術語:
95
277100
2469
04:51
it's an illusory虛幻 superiority優勢 complex複雜,
thinking思維 we know things.
96
279593
3643
它是一種虛幻的優越情節,
認為我們什麼都知道。
04:55
In other words, people think
they know more than they do.
97
283260
2817
換言之,「認為自己知道的」
比「真正知道的」多。
04:59
Or they underestimate低估
what they don't know.
98
287553
2933
或是說低估了自己不知道的。
05:02
And then, there's cognitive認知 dissonance不和諧.
99
290847
2467
接著,還有認知失調。
05:06
Cognitive認知 dissonance不和諧 is interesting有趣.
100
294831
2333
認知失調很有趣。
05:09
We just recently最近 had Groundhog土撥鼠 Day, right?
101
297538
2650
我們才剛過了土撥鼠節,對吧?
05:13
Now, there's no better definition定義
of cognitive認知 dissonance不和諧
102
301132
2721
認知失調最好的定義就是
05:15
than intelligent智能 people asking me
if a rodent's囓齒動物的 forecast預測 is accurate準確.
103
303877
3518
有智慧的人問我齧齒目
動物的預測是否正確。
05:19
(Laughter笑聲)
104
307419
2731
(笑聲)
05:22
But I get that, all of the time.
105
310174
2547
但常常會有人問我這個問題。
05:24
(Laughter笑聲)
106
312745
1254
(笑聲)
05:26
But I also hear
about the Farmer's農民 Almanac年鑒.
107
314023
3603
但我也聽過農民曆。
05:29
We grew成長 up on the Farmer's農民 Almanac年鑒,
people are familiar with it.
108
317650
3196
我們是看農民曆長大的,
大家很熟悉它。
05:34
The problem問題 is, it's only
about 37 percent百分 accurate準確,
109
322259
3412
問題是,
它只有 37% 的正確率,
05:37
according根據 to studies學習
at Penn佩恩 State University大學.
110
325695
3134
這是賓夕法尼亞州立大學
研究出來的數據。
05:43
But we're in an era時代 of science科學
111
331458
3571
但我們所處的科學時代,
05:47
where we actually其實
can forecast預測 the weather天氣.
112
335053
2064
是可以正確預測天氣的。
05:49
And believe it or not, and I know
some of you are like, "Yeah, right,"
113
337141
3421
信不信由你,我知道
有人在想「最好是啦」。
在天氣預測上,我們可以
達到 90% 以上的正確率。
05:52
we're about 90 percent百分 accurate準確, or more,
with weather天氣 forecast預測.
114
340586
3023
你們只是傾向會記得偶爾
才發生的錯誤預測,真的。
05:55
You just tend趨向 to remember記得
the occasional偶然 miss小姐, you do.
115
343633
2624
05:58
(Laughter笑聲)
116
346281
1150
(笑聲)
06:02
So confirmation確認 bias偏壓,
Dunning-Kruger鄧甯-克魯格 and cognitive認知 dissonance不和諧.
117
350263
3405
所以,確認偏誤、
達克效應,和認知失調。
06:05
I think those shape形狀 biases偏見 and perceptions看法
that people have about science科學.
118
353692
5412
我認為這些元素造成了
對於科學的偏見和認知。
06:11
But then, there's literacy讀寫能力
and misinformation誤傳
119
359625
2149
但,還有識字能力和錯誤訊息,
06:13
that keep us boxed盒裝 in, as well.
120
361798
2067
會讓我們的所知受限。
06:17
During the hurricane颶風 season季節 of 2017,
121
365911
2484
在 2017 年的颶風季,
06:20
media媒體 outlets網點 had to actually其實
assign分配 reporters記者
122
368419
4213
媒體管道真的有指派記者
06:24
to dismiss解僱 fake information信息
about the weather天氣 forecast預測.
123
372656
4157
去排除關於天氣預測的假資訊。
06:30
That's the era時代 that we're in.
124
378204
1934
那就是我們所處的時代。
06:32
I deal合同 with this all the time
in social社會 media媒體.
125
380644
2437
我總是要在社交媒體上
處理這種事。
06:35
Someone有人 will tweet鳴叫 a forecast預測 --
126
383105
1587
有人會在推特上發佈預測——
那是颶風艾瑪的預測,
06:36
that's a forecast預測 for Hurricane颶風 Irma姨媽,
but here's這裡的 the problem問題:
127
384716
2936
但有個問題:這個預測
並非來自國家颶風中心。
06:39
it didn't come from the Hurricane颶風 Center中央.
128
387676
2000
06:42
But people were tweeting啁啾
and sharing分享 this; it went viral病毒.
129
390608
2787
但大家就不斷轉推和分享
這個預測;它被瘋傳。
06:45
It didn't come from
the National國民 Hurricane颶風 Center中央 at all.
130
393419
2865
它完全不是來自國家颶風中心的。
06:50
So I spent花費 12 years年份 of my career事業 at NASANASA
131
398363
2484
我的職涯中,有十二年
是在太空總署,
06:52
before coming未來
to the University大學 of Georgia格魯吉亞,
132
400871
2032
後來才到喬治亞大學,
06:54
and I chair椅子 their Earth地球 Science科學
Advisory諮詢 Committee委員會,
133
402927
2515
我在他們的地球科學
諮詢委員會當主席,
我上週才到華盛頓特區。
06:57
I was just up there last week in DCDC.
134
405466
1817
我看到了一些很有趣的事。
06:59
And I saw some really interesting有趣 things.
135
407307
1987
這是太空總署的模型,
以及來自衛星的資料,
07:01
Here's這裡的 a NASANASA model模型
and science科學 data數據 from satellite衛星
136
409318
3238
07:04
showing展示 the 2017 hurricane颶風 season季節.
137
412580
2283
呈現出來的
是 2017 年的颶風季。
07:06
You see Hurricane颶風 Harvey哈維 there?
138
414887
2066
有看到那裡的颶風哈維嗎?
07:09
Look at all the dust灰塵 coming未來 off of Africa非洲.
139
417649
2509
看看所有從非洲來的塵土。
07:12
Look at the wildfires野火 up in northwest西北 US
and in western西 Canada加拿大.
140
420617
4987
看看美國西北部
和加拿大西部的野火。
07:17
There comes Hurricane颶風 Irma姨媽.
141
425628
1800
颶風艾瑪來了。
07:20
This is fascinating迷人 to me.
142
428923
2143
這對我來說很迷人。
07:23
But admittedly固然, I'm a weather天氣 geek極客.
143
431688
2095
但,必須要承認,
我是個天氣怪咖。
07:26
But more importantly重要的, it illustrates說明
that we have the technology技術
144
434982
3476
但,更重要的是,
它說明了我們不僅有
可以觀察天氣和氣候系統的
科技,也能做預測。
07:30
to not only observe the weather天氣
and climate氣候 system系統,
145
438482
2579
07:33
but predict預測 it.
146
441085
1150
07:34
There's scientific科學 understanding理解,
147
442625
1762
這裡有科學上的了解,
07:36
so there's no need for some
of those perceptions看法 and biases偏見
148
444411
3087
所以就不需要我們先前談的
那些認知和偏見。
07:39
that we've我們已經 been talking about.
149
447522
1570
07:41
We have knowledge知識.
150
449116
1199
我們有知識。但,想想看……
07:42
But think about this ...
151
450339
1238
07:43
This is Houston休斯頓, Texas德州,
after Hurricane颶風 Harvey哈維.
152
451601
3182
這是颶風哈維過後的德州休士頓。
07:47
Now, I write a contribution貢獻
for "Forbes福布斯" magazine雜誌 periodically定期,
153
455736
2963
我定期會為《富比士》雜誌寫稿,
07:50
and I wrote an article文章 a week before
Hurricane颶風 Harvey哈維 made製作 landfall登陸, saying,
154
458733
4531
在颶風哈維登陸前一週,
我寫了一篇文章,說:
07:55
"There's probably大概 going to be
40 to 50 inches英寸 of rainfall雨量."
155
463288
2842
「可能會有四十
到五十英吋的降雨。」
07:58
I wrote that a week before it happened發生.
156
466776
2484
這是在發生前一週寫的。
08:01
But yet然而, when you talk
to people in Houston休斯頓,
157
469284
2126
但,當你和休士頓的人談話時,
他們會說:「我們完全
不知道這次會這麼糟。」
08:03
people are saying, "We had no idea理念
it was going to be this bad."
158
471434
3073
08:07
I'm just...
159
475093
1175
我只是……
08:08
(Sigh)
160
476292
1181
(嘆氣)
08:09
(Laughter笑聲)
161
477497
1136
(笑聲)
08:10
A week before.
162
478657
1174
一週前。
08:11
But --
163
479855
1190
但——
08:13
I know, it's amusing有趣, but the reality現實 is,
164
481069
2498
我知道,這很有趣,但現實是,
08:15
we all struggle鬥爭 with perceiving感知 something
outside of our experience經驗 level水平.
165
483591
6144
我們都很難認知
在我們經驗層級以外的東西。
08:21
People in Houston休斯頓
get rain all of the time,
166
489759
2270
休士頓的人常常遇到下雨,
08:24
they flood洪水 all of the time.
167
492053
1800
常常有水災。
08:26
But they've他們已經 never experienced有經驗的 that.
168
494513
2334
但他們從來沒有經驗過那種災難。
08:29
Houston休斯頓 gets得到 about 34 inches英寸 of rainfall雨量
for the entire整個 year.
169
497561
4389
休士頓整年的降雨量
大約是三十四英吋。
08:33
They got 50 inches英寸 in three days.
170
501974
2555
三天內,降雨共五十英吋。
08:37
That's an anomaly不規則 event事件,
that's outside of the normal正常.
171
505300
3091
那是件異常事件,並非正常的。
08:42
So belief信仰 systems系統 and biases偏見,
literacy讀寫能力 and misinformation誤傳.
172
510188
2841
所以,信念系統和偏見,
識字能力和錯誤資訊。
08:45
How do we step out of the boxes盒子
that are cornering轉彎 our perceptions看法?
173
513053
3883
要如何爬出限制我們認知的井底?
08:50
Well we don't even have to go to Houston休斯頓,
we can come very close to home.
174
518633
3733
我們甚至不用到休士頓,
我們可以到離家很近的地方。
08:54
(Laughter笑聲)
175
522390
1181
(笑聲)
08:55
Remember記得 "Snowpocalypse雪啟示錄?"
176
523595
1913
記得「雪界末日
(改自世界末日)嗎」?
08:57
(Laughter笑聲)
177
525532
1801
(笑聲)
末日暴雪(改自末日大戰)?
08:59
Snowmageddon斯諾馬格登?
178
527357
1500
09:00
Snowzilla斯諾齊拉?
179
528881
1151
雪吉拉(改自哥吉拉)?
不論你怎麼稱呼它。
09:02
Whatever隨你 you want to call it.
180
530056
2029
09:04
All two inches英寸 of it.
181
532109
2317
積雪總共有兩英吋。
09:06
(Laughter笑聲)
182
534450
2603
(笑聲)
09:09
Two inches英寸 of snow
shut關閉 the city of Atlanta亞特蘭大 down.
183
537077
2865
兩英吋的積雪,
讓亞特蘭大市關閉。
09:11
(Laughter笑聲)
184
539966
1571
(笑聲)
09:14
But the reality現實 is,
we were in a winter冬季 storm風暴 watch,
185
542982
4254
但現實是當時我們
正處於冬季風暴中。
09:19
we went to a winter冬季 weather天氣 advisory諮詢,
186
547260
2635
我們發布寒冬天氣預報。
09:21
and a lot of people perceived感知 that
as being存在 a downgrade下坡,
187
549919
2650
很多人認為說得太嚴重了:
「喔,不會那麼糟的。」
09:24
"Oh, it's not going to be as bad."
188
552593
1667
當他們的認知是「不會那麼糟」,
09:26
When in fact事實, the perception知覺
was that it was not going to be as bad,
189
554284
3230
事實卻是狀況更新成「更為嚴峻」。
09:29
but it was actually其實 an upgrade升級.
190
557538
1634
隨著新到的模型,一切都在惡化。
09:31
Things were getting得到 worse更差
as the models楷模 were coming未來 in.
191
559196
2587
09:33
So that's an example of how we get
boxed盒裝 in by our perceptions看法.
192
561807
3806
那就是我們被認知
困在井底的一個例子。
09:38
So, the question becomes,
193
566165
1976
所以,問題變成了:
09:40
how do we expand擴大 our radius半徑?
194
568165
3491
我們要如何擴展我們的半徑?
09:45
The area of a circle is "piPI r squared平方".
195
573823
1910
圓的面積是「π r 平方」。
09:47
We increase增加 the radius半徑,
we increase增加 the area.
196
575757
2243
我們若能增加半徑,
就能增加面積。
09:50
How do we expand擴大 our radius半徑
of understanding理解 about science科學?
197
578024
3981
我們要如何擴展我們
在了解科學方面的半徑?
09:54
Here are my thoughts思念.
198
582593
1400
以下是我的想法。
09:56
You take inventory庫存 of your own擁有 biases偏見.
199
584720
3071
你把你自己的偏見盤點一下。
09:59
And I'm challenging具有挑戰性的 you all to do that.
200
587815
2016
我挑戰各位去做這件事。
10:01
Take an inventory庫存 of your own擁有 biases偏見.
201
589855
3024
把你自己的偏見盤點一下。
10:04
Where do they come from?
202
592903
1285
它們是從哪裡來的?
10:06
Your upbringing教養, your political政治
perspective透視, your faith信仰 --
203
594212
3374
你的養育過程、
你的政治觀點、你的信仰——
10:09
what shapes形狀 your own擁有 biases偏見?
204
597610
2419
你自己的偏見是由什麼形成的?
接著,評估你的資訊來源——
10:13
Then, evaluate評估 your sources來源 --
205
601982
1437
10:15
where do you get
your information信息 on science科學?
206
603443
2451
你從哪裡取得
那些關於科學的資訊?
10:18
What do you read, what do you listen to,
207
606553
1976
你會讀什麼、你會聽什麼,
來取得關於科學的資訊?
10:20
to consume消耗 your information信息 on science科學?
208
608553
2000
10:23
And then, it's important重要 to speak說話 out.
209
611022
2746
接著,很重要的是要說出來。
10:25
Talk about how you evaluated評價 your biases偏見
and evaluated評價 your sources來源.
210
613792
4118
談談你如何評估
你的偏見以及你的來源。
10:29
I want you to listen to this
little 40-second clip
211
617934
2770
我想請各位聽聽
這一小段影片,只有四十秒,
10:32
from one of the top最佳
TV電視 meteorologists氣象學 家 in the US, Greg格雷格 Fishel菲謝爾,
212
620728
4778
美國最頂尖的電視氣象學家之一,
北卡羅萊納州,羅利達拉姆
三角區的格雷格費雪爾。
10:37
in the Raleigh羅利, Durham達勒姆 area.
213
625530
1523
10:39
He's revered尊敬 in that region地區.
214
627077
1675
他在那個地區倍受推崇。
但他是個氣候懷疑論者。
10:40
But he was a climate氣候 skeptic懷疑論者.
215
628776
1405
10:42
But listen to what he says
about speaking請講 out.
216
630205
2237
但聽聽他對於「說出來」怎麼說。
10:44
Greg格雷格 Fishel菲謝爾:
The mistake錯誤 I was making製造
217
632466
1736
格雷格費雪爾:我所犯下的錯誤,
10:46
and didn't realize實現 until直到 very recently最近,
218
634226
1954
且一直到最近才發現,
10:48
was that I was only looking
for information信息
219
636204
2593
就是我只有針對我既有的想法
10:50
to support支持 what I already已經 thought,
220
638821
2861
來尋找支持的資訊,
10:53
and was not interested有興趣
in listening to anything contrary相反.
221
641706
4107
且我沒興趣傾聽任何相反資訊。
10:58
And so I woke醒來 up one morning早上,
222
646559
2071
所以,有天早上我醒來時,
11:00
and there was this question in my mind心神,
223
648654
3698
腦中有一個問題:
11:04
"Greg格雷格, are you engaging
in confirmation確認 bias偏壓?
224
652918
2604
「格雷格,你是否有確認偏誤?
11:07
Are you only looking for information信息
to support支持 what you already已經 think?"
225
655546
3925
你是否只在尋找
支持你想法的資訊?」
11:12
And if I was honest誠實 with myself,
and I tried試著 to be,
226
660069
2439
若我對自己很誠實,
且我有試著這麼做,
11:14
I admitted承認 that was going on.
227
662522
2328
我會承認我的確有這個狀況。
11:17
And so the more I talked to scientists科學家們
228
665269
2514
所以,我和越多科學家談話,
11:19
and read peer-reviewed同行評審 literature文學
229
667807
2058
閱讀越多同儕審查論文,
並照我學生時期
在賓夕法尼亞州立大學
11:21
and tried試著 to conduct進行 myself the way
I'd been taught to conduct進行 myself
230
669889
4712
被教導的方式來做人做事,
11:26
at Penn佩恩 State when I was a student學生,
231
674625
2333
11:29
it became成為 very difficult for me
to make the argument論據
232
677665
2692
我就越難主張說
11:32
that we weren't at least最小
having some effect影響.
233
680381
2060
我們沒有受到絲毫影響。
11:34
Maybe there was still a doubt懷疑
as to how much,
234
682465
2436
也許還無法確定影響有多少,
11:36
but to say "nothing" was not
a responsible主管 thing for me to do
235
684925
4715
但對我來說,說「沒有」
是很不負責的,
11:41
as a scientist科學家 or a person.
236
689664
1800
不論以一個科學家
或一個人的身分都一樣。
11:45
JMSJms: Greg格雷格 Fishel菲謝爾 just talked
about expanding擴大 his radius半徑
237
693387
3861
講者:格雷格費雪爾在說的,
就是擴展他了解科學的半徑。
11:49
of understanding理解 of science科學.
238
697272
1623
11:50
And when we expand擴大 our radius半徑,
239
698919
2055
當我們能擴展我們的半徑時,
11:52
it's not about making製造 a better future未來,
240
700998
3198
重點並不在於讓未來更好,
11:56
but it's about preserving
life as we know it.
241
704220
3067
而在於保存生命現有的狀態。
12:00
So as we think about expanding擴大
our own擁有 radius半徑 in understanding理解 science科學,
242
708180
4954
所以,當我們想著要擴展
我們了解科學的半徑時,
12:06
it's critical危急 for Athens雅典, Georgia格魯吉亞,
for Atlanta亞特蘭大, Georgia格魯吉亞,
243
714292
3372
這對於喬治亞州的雅典、
喬治亞州的亞特蘭大、
12:09
for the state of Georgia格魯吉亞,
and for the world世界.
244
717688
2858
整個喬治亞州,及全世界,都很重要。
12:12
So expand擴大 your radius半徑.
245
720857
2071
所以,擴展你們的半徑吧。
12:14
Thank you.
246
722952
1183
謝謝。
12:16
(Applause掌聲)
247
724159
4015
(掌聲)
Translated by Lilian Chiu
Reviewed by congmei Han

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
J. Marshall Shepherd - Meteorologist
Dr. J. Marshall Shepherd is a leading international expert in weather and climate and is the Georgia Athletic Association Distinguished Professor of Geography and Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Georgia.

Why you should listen

Dr. J. Marshall Shepherd was the 2013 President of American Meteorological Society (AMS), the nation's largest and oldest professional/science society in the atmospheric and related sciences. He serves as Director of the University of Georgia's (UGA) Atmospheric Sciences Program and Full Professor in the Department of Geography where he is Associate Department Head.

Shepherd is also the host of The Weather Channel’s Weather Geeks, a pioneering Sunday talk show dedicated to science, and he is a contributor to Forbes Magazine. Dr. Shepherd routinely appears on national media outlets like CNN, The Weather Channel, CBS's Face The Nation and more. He also provides expertise to NASA, NOAA, The White House, Congress and other stakeholders.

More profile about the speaker
J. Marshall Shepherd | Speaker | TED.com