TED2008
Patricia Burchat: Shedding light on dark matter
Filmed:
Readability: 4.2
1,605,112 views
Physicist Patricia Burchat sheds light on two basic ingredients of our universe: dark matter and dark energy. Comprising 96% of the universe between them, they can't be directly measured, but their influence is immense.
Patricia Burchat - Particle physicist
Patricia Burchat studies the structure and distribution of dark matter and dark energy. These mysterious ingredients can't be measured in conventional ways, yet form a quarter of the mass of our universe. Full bio
Patricia Burchat studies the structure and distribution of dark matter and dark energy. These mysterious ingredients can't be measured in conventional ways, yet form a quarter of the mass of our universe. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:18
As a particle physicist, I study the elementary particles
0
0
4000
00:22
and how they interact on the most fundamental level.
1
4000
3000
00:25
For most of my research career, I've been using accelerators,
2
7000
3000
00:28
such as the electron accelerator at Stanford University, just up the road,
3
10000
3000
00:31
to study things on the smallest scale.
4
13000
3000
00:34
But more recently, I've been turning my attention
5
16000
2000
00:36
to the universe on the largest scale.
6
18000
3000
00:39
Because, as I'll explain to you,
7
21000
2000
00:41
the questions on the smallest and the largest scale are actually very connected.
8
23000
4000
00:45
So I'm going to tell you about our twenty-first-century view of the universe,
9
27000
5000
00:50
what it's made of and what the big questions in the physical sciences are --
10
32000
3000
00:53
at least some of the big questions.
11
35000
2000
00:55
So, recently, we have realized
12
37000
3000
00:58
that the ordinary matter in the universe --
13
40000
2000
01:00
and by ordinary matter, I mean you, me,
14
42000
3000
01:03
the planets, the stars, the galaxies --
15
45000
2000
01:05
the ordinary matter makes up only a few percent
16
47000
3000
01:08
of the content of the universe.
17
50000
2000
01:10
Almost a quarter, or approximately a quarter
18
52000
3000
01:13
of the matter in the universe, is stuff that's invisible.
19
55000
3000
01:16
By invisible, I mean it doesn't absorb in the electromagnetic spectrum.
20
58000
4000
01:20
It doesn't emit in the electromagnetic spectrum. It doesn't reflect.
21
62000
3000
01:23
It doesn't interact with the electromagnetic spectrum,
22
65000
2000
01:25
which is what we use to detect things.
23
67000
2000
01:27
It doesn't interact at all. So how do we know it's there?
24
69000
3000
01:30
We know it's there by its gravitational effects.
25
72000
2000
01:32
In fact, this dark matter dominates
26
74000
3000
01:35
the gravitational effects in the universe on a large scale,
27
77000
3000
01:38
and I'll be telling you about the evidence for that.
28
80000
2000
01:40
What about the rest of the pie?
29
82000
2000
01:42
The rest of the pie is a very mysterious substance called dark energy.
30
84000
4000
01:46
More about that later, OK.
31
88000
2000
01:48
So for now, let's turn to the evidence for dark matter.
32
90000
3000
01:51
In these galaxies, especially in a spiral galaxy like this,
33
93000
3000
01:54
most of the mass of the stars is concentrated in the middle of the galaxy.
34
96000
5000
01:59
This huge mass of all these stars keeps stars in circular orbits in the galaxy.
35
101000
7000
02:06
So we have these stars going around in circles like this.
36
108000
3000
02:09
As you can imagine, even if you know physics, this should be intuitive, OK --
37
111000
4000
02:13
that stars that are closer to the mass in the middle will be rotating at a higher speed
38
115000
6000
02:19
than those that are further out here, OK.
39
121000
3000
02:22
So what you would expect is that if you measured the orbital speed of the stars,
40
124000
5000
02:27
that they should be slower on the edges than on the inside.
41
129000
4000
02:31
In other words, if we measured speed as a function of distance --
42
133000
2000
02:33
this is the only time I'm going to show a graph, OK --
43
135000
2000
02:35
we would expect that it goes down as the distance increases
44
137000
4000
02:39
from the center of the galaxy.
45
141000
2000
02:41
When those measurements are made,
46
143000
1000
02:42
instead what we find is that the speed is basically constant,
47
144000
3000
02:45
as a function of distance.
48
147000
2000
02:47
If it's constant, that means that the stars out here
49
149000
3000
02:50
are feeling the gravitational effects of matter that we do not see.
50
152000
4000
02:54
In fact, this galaxy and every other galaxy
51
156000
3000
02:57
appears to be embedded in a cloud of this invisible dark matter.
52
159000
5000
03:02
And this cloud of matter is much more spherical than the galaxy themselves,
53
164000
4000
03:06
and it extends over a much wider range than the galaxy.
54
168000
4000
03:10
So we see the galaxy and fixate on that, but it's actually a cloud of dark matter
55
172000
4000
03:14
that's dominating the structure and the dynamics of this galaxy.
56
176000
5000
03:19
Galaxies themselves are not strewn randomly in space;
57
181000
3000
03:22
they tend to cluster.
58
184000
2000
03:24
And this is an example of a very, actually, famous cluster, the Coma cluster.
59
186000
3000
03:27
And there are thousands of galaxies in this cluster.
60
189000
3000
03:30
They're the white, fuzzy, elliptical things here.
61
192000
3000
03:33
So these galaxy clusters -- we take a snapshot now,
62
195000
3000
03:36
we take a snapshot in a decade, it'll look identical.
63
198000
3000
03:39
But these galaxies are actually moving at extremely high speeds.
64
201000
4000
03:43
They're moving around in this gravitational potential well of this cluster, OK.
65
205000
5000
03:48
So all of these galaxies are moving.
66
210000
2000
03:50
We can measure the speeds of these galaxies, their orbital velocities,
67
212000
4000
03:54
and figure out how much mass is in this cluster.
68
216000
2000
03:56
And again, what we find is that there is much more mass there
69
218000
4000
04:00
than can be accounted for by the galaxies that we see.
70
222000
4000
04:04
Or if we look in other parts of the electromagnetic spectrum,
71
226000
2000
04:06
we see that there's a lot of gas in this cluster, as well.
72
228000
3000
04:09
But that cannot account for the mass either.
73
231000
2000
04:11
In fact, there appears to be about ten times as much mass here
74
233000
3000
04:14
in the form of this invisible or dark matter
75
236000
3000
04:17
as there is in the ordinary matter, OK.
76
239000
4000
04:21
It would be nice if we could see this dark matter a little bit more directly.
77
243000
4000
04:25
I'm just putting this big, blue blob on there, OK,
78
247000
2000
04:27
to try to remind you that it's there.
79
249000
2000
04:29
Can we see it more visually? Yes, we can.
80
251000
3000
04:32
And so let me lead you through how we can do this.
81
254000
2000
04:34
So here's an observer:
82
256000
2000
04:36
it could be an eye; it could be a telescope.
83
258000
2000
04:38
And suppose there's a galaxy out here in the universe.
84
260000
2000
04:40
How do we see that galaxy?
85
262000
2000
04:42
A ray of light leaves the galaxy and travels through the universe
86
264000
3000
04:45
for perhaps billions of years
87
267000
2000
04:47
before it enters the telescope or your eye.
88
269000
3000
04:50
Now, how do we deduce where the galaxy is?
89
272000
3000
04:53
Well, we deduce it by the direction that the ray is traveling
90
275000
3000
04:56
as it enters our eye, right?
91
278000
2000
04:58
We say, the ray of light came this way;
92
280000
2000
05:00
the galaxy must be there, OK.
93
282000
2000
05:02
Now, suppose I put in the middle a cluster of galaxies --
94
284000
4000
05:06
and don't forget the dark matter, OK.
95
288000
2000
05:08
Now, if we consider a different ray of light, one going off like this,
96
290000
4000
05:12
we now need to take into account
97
294000
2000
05:14
what Einstein predicted when he developed general relativity.
98
296000
3000
05:17
And that was that the gravitational field, due to mass,
99
299000
4000
05:21
will deflect not only the trajectory of particles,
100
303000
3000
05:24
but will deflect light itself.
101
306000
3000
05:27
So this light ray will not continue in a straight line,
102
309000
3000
05:30
but would rather bend and could end up going into our eye.
103
312000
4000
05:34
Where will this observer see the galaxy?
104
316000
3000
05:37
You can respond. Up, right?
105
319000
4000
05:41
We extrapolate backwards and say the galaxy is up here.
106
323000
3000
05:44
Is there any other ray of light
107
326000
1000
05:45
that could make into the observer's eye from that galaxy?
108
327000
3000
05:48
Yes, great. I see people going down like this.
109
330000
3000
05:51
So a ray of light could go down, be bent
110
333000
2000
05:53
up into the observer's eye,
111
335000
2000
05:55
and the observer sees a ray of light here.
112
337000
2000
05:57
Now, take into account the fact that we live in
113
339000
2000
05:59
a three-dimensional universe, OK,
114
341000
2000
06:01
a three-dimensional space.
115
343000
2000
06:03
Are there any other rays of light that could make it into the eye?
116
345000
3000
06:06
Yes! The rays would lie on a -- I'd like to see -- yeah, on a cone.
117
348000
6000
06:12
So there's a whole ray of light -- rays of light on a cone --
118
354000
2000
06:14
that will all be bent by that cluster
119
356000
2000
06:16
and make it into the observer's eye.
120
358000
3000
06:19
If there is a cone of light coming into my eye, what do I see?
121
361000
5000
06:24
A circle, a ring. It's called an Einstein ring. Einstein predicted that, OK.
122
366000
4000
06:28
Now, it will only be a perfect ring if the source, the deflector
123
370000
5000
06:33
and the eyeball, in this case, are all in a perfectly straight line.
124
375000
5000
06:38
If they're slightly skewed, we'll see a different image.
125
380000
3000
06:41
Now, you can do an experiment tonight over the reception, OK,
126
383000
3000
06:44
to figure out what that image will look like.
127
386000
3000
06:47
Because it turns out that there is a kind of lens that we can devise,
128
389000
4000
06:51
that has the right shape to produce this kind of effect.
129
393000
3000
06:54
We call this gravitational lensing.
130
396000
2000
06:56
And so, this is your instrument, OK.
131
398000
3000
06:59
(Laughter).
132
401000
1000
07:00
But ignore the top part.
133
402000
3000
07:03
It's the base that I want you to concentrate, OK.
134
405000
3000
07:06
So, actually, at home, whenever we break a wineglass,
135
408000
2000
07:08
I save the bottom, take it over to the machine shop.
136
410000
2000
07:10
We shave it off, and I have a little gravitational lens, OK.
137
412000
4000
07:14
So it's got the right shape to produce the lensing.
138
416000
2000
07:16
And so the next thing you need to do in your experiment
139
418000
2000
07:18
is grab a napkin. I grabbed a piece of graph paper -- I'm a physicist. (Laughter)
140
420000
4000
07:22
So, a napkin. Draw a little model galaxy in the middle.
141
424000
4000
07:26
And now put the lens over the galaxy,
142
428000
3000
07:29
and what you'll find is that you'll see a ring, an Einstein ring.
143
431000
3000
07:32
Now, move the base off to the side,
144
434000
3000
07:35
and the ring will split up into arcs, OK.
145
437000
3000
07:38
And you can put it on top of any image.
146
440000
2000
07:40
On the graph paper, you can see
147
442000
1000
07:41
how all the lines on the graph paper have been distorted.
148
443000
2000
07:43
And again, this is a kind of an accurate model
149
445000
3000
07:46
of what happens with the gravitational lensing.
150
448000
2000
07:48
OK, so the question is: do we see this in the sky?
151
450000
4000
07:52
Do we see arcs in the sky when we look at, say, a cluster of galaxies?
152
454000
4000
07:56
And the answer is yes.
153
458000
2000
07:58
And so, here's an image from the Hubble Space Telescope.
154
460000
2000
08:00
Many of the images you are seeing
155
462000
2000
08:02
are earlier from the Hubble Space Telescope.
156
464000
2000
08:04
Well, first of all, for the golden shape galaxies --
157
466000
2000
08:06
those are the galaxies in the cluster.
158
468000
3000
08:09
They're the ones that are embedded in that sea of dark matter
159
471000
4000
08:13
that are causing the bending of the light
160
475000
2000
08:15
to cause these optical illusions, or mirages, practically,
161
477000
3000
08:18
of the background galaxies.
162
480000
2000
08:20
So the streaks that you see, all these streaks,
163
482000
3000
08:23
are actually distorted images of galaxies that are much further away.
164
485000
4000
08:27
So what we can do, then, is based on how much distortion
165
489000
3000
08:30
we see in those images, we can calculate how much mass
166
492000
4000
08:34
there must be in this cluster.
167
496000
2000
08:36
And it's an enormous amount of mass.
168
498000
2000
08:38
And also, you can tell by eye, by looking at this,
169
500000
2000
08:40
that these arcs are not centered on individual galaxies.
170
502000
4000
08:44
They are centered on some more spread out structure,
171
506000
4000
08:48
and that is the dark matter
172
510000
4000
08:52
in which the cluster is embedded, OK.
173
514000
3000
08:55
So this is the closest you can get to kind of seeing
174
517000
2000
08:57
at least the effects of the dark matter with your naked eye.
175
519000
3000
09:00
OK, so, a quick review then, to see that you're following.
176
522000
3000
09:03
So the evidence that we have
177
525000
2000
09:05
that a quarter of the universe is dark matter --
178
527000
2000
09:07
this gravitationally attracting stuff --
179
529000
2000
09:09
is that galaxies, the speed with which stars orbiting galaxies
180
531000
4000
09:13
is much too large; it must be embedded in dark matter.
181
535000
3000
09:16
The speed with which galaxies within clusters are orbiting is much too large;
182
538000
4000
09:20
it must be embedded in dark matter.
183
542000
2000
09:22
And we see these gravitational lensing effects, these distortions
184
544000
4000
09:26
that say that, again, clusters are embedded in dark matter.
185
548000
3000
09:29
OK. So now, let's turn to dark energy.
186
551000
4000
09:33
So to understand the evidence for dark energy, we need to discuss something
187
555000
3000
09:36
that Stephen Hawking referred to in the previous session.
188
558000
4000
09:40
And that is the fact that space itself is expanding.
189
562000
4000
09:44
So if we imagine a section of our infinite universe --
190
566000
5000
09:49
and so I've put down four spiral galaxies, OK --
191
571000
3000
09:52
and imagine that you put down a set of tape measures,
192
574000
4000
09:56
so every line on here corresponds to a tape measure,
193
578000
2000
09:58
horizontal or vertical, for measuring where things are.
194
580000
4000
10:02
If you could do this, what you would find
195
584000
2000
10:04
that with each passing day, each passing year,
196
586000
3000
10:07
each passing billions of years, OK,
197
589000
3000
10:10
the distance between galaxies is getting greater.
198
592000
3000
10:13
And it's not because galaxies are moving
199
595000
1000
10:14
away from each other through space.
200
596000
3000
10:17
They're not necessarily moving through space.
201
599000
2000
10:19
They're moving away from each other
202
601000
2000
10:21
because space itself is getting bigger, OK.
203
603000
3000
10:24
That's what the expansion of the universe or space means.
204
606000
4000
10:28
So they're moving further apart.
205
610000
2000
10:30
Now, what Stephen Hawking mentioned, as well,
206
612000
4000
10:34
is that after the Big Bang, space expanded at a very rapid rate.
207
616000
6000
10:40
But because gravitationally attracting matter
208
622000
4000
10:44
is embedded in this space,
209
626000
2000
10:46
it tends to slow down the expansion of the space, OK.
210
628000
3000
10:49
So the expansion slows down with time.
211
631000
3000
10:52
So, in the last century, OK, people debated
212
634000
4000
10:56
about whether this expansion of space would continue forever;
213
638000
5000
11:01
whether it would slow down, you know,
214
643000
2000
11:03
will be slowing down, but continue forever;
215
645000
2000
11:05
slow down and stop, asymptotically stop;
216
647000
5000
11:10
or slow down, stop, and then reverse, so it starts to contract again.
217
652000
5000
11:15
So a little over a decade ago,
218
657000
2000
11:17
two groups of physicists and astronomers
219
659000
5000
11:22
set out to measure the rate at which
220
664000
2000
11:24
the expansion of space was slowing down, OK.
221
666000
4000
11:28
By how much less is it expanding today,
222
670000
2000
11:30
compared to, say, a couple of billion years ago?
223
672000
3000
11:33
The startling answer to this question, OK, from these experiments,
224
675000
5000
11:38
was that space is expanding at a faster rate today
225
680000
4000
11:42
than it was a few billion years ago, OK.
226
684000
3000
11:45
So the expansion of space is actually speeding up.
227
687000
3000
11:48
This was a completely surprising result.
228
690000
3000
11:51
There is no persuasive theoretical argument for why this should happen, OK.
229
693000
6000
11:57
No one was predicting ahead of time this is what's going to be found.
230
699000
3000
12:00
It was the opposite of what was expected.
231
702000
2000
12:02
So we need something to be able to explain that.
232
704000
3000
12:05
Now it turns out, in the mathematics,
233
707000
2000
12:07
you can put it in as a term that's an energy,
234
709000
4000
12:11
but it's a completely different type of energy
235
713000
1000
12:12
from anything we've ever seen before.
236
714000
2000
12:14
We call it dark energy,
237
716000
2000
12:16
and it has this effect of causing space to expand.
238
718000
3000
12:19
But we don't have a good motivation
239
721000
2000
12:21
for putting it in there at this point, OK.
240
723000
2000
12:23
So it's really unexplained as to why we need to put it in.
241
725000
3000
12:26
Now, so at this point, then, what I want to really emphasize to you,
242
728000
4000
12:30
is that, first of all, dark matter and dark energy
243
732000
2000
12:32
are completely different things, OK.
244
734000
2000
12:34
There are really two mysteries out there as to what makes up most of the universe,
245
736000
4000
12:38
and they have very different effects.
246
740000
3000
12:41
Dark matter, because it gravitationally attracts,
247
743000
3000
12:44
it tends to encourage the growth of structure, OK.
248
746000
4000
12:48
So clusters of galaxies will tend to form,
249
750000
3000
12:51
because of all this gravitational attraction.
250
753000
2000
12:53
Dark energy, on the other hand,
251
755000
2000
12:55
is putting more and more space between the galaxies,
252
757000
4000
12:59
makes it, the gravitational attraction between them decrease,
253
761000
3000
13:02
and so it impedes the growth of structure.
254
764000
3000
13:05
So by looking at things like clusters of galaxies,
255
767000
3000
13:08
and how they -- their number density,
256
770000
4000
13:12
how many there are as a function of time --
257
774000
2000
13:14
we can learn about how dark matter and dark energy
258
776000
4000
13:18
compete against each other in structure forming.
259
780000
3000
13:21
In terms of dark matter, I said that we don't have any,
260
783000
3000
13:24
you know, really persuasive argument for dark energy.
261
786000
4000
13:28
Do we have anything for dark matter? And the answer is yes.
262
790000
3000
13:31
We have well-motivated candidates for the dark matter.
263
793000
3000
13:34
Now, what do I mean by well motivated?
264
796000
3000
13:37
I mean that we have mathematically consistent theories
265
799000
5000
13:42
that were actually introduced
266
804000
2000
13:44
to explain a completely different phenomenon, OK,
267
806000
3000
13:47
things that I haven't even talked about,
268
809000
2000
13:49
that each predict the existence
269
811000
3000
13:52
of a very weakly interacting, new particle.
270
814000
3000
13:55
So, this is exactly what you want in physics:
271
817000
2000
13:57
where a prediction comes out of a mathematically consistent theory
272
819000
4000
14:01
that was actually developed for something else.
273
823000
2000
14:03
But we don't know if either of those
274
825000
3000
14:06
are actually the dark matter candidate, OK.
275
828000
3000
14:09
One or both, who knows? Or it could be something completely different.
276
831000
3000
14:12
Now, we look for these dark matter particles
277
834000
2000
14:14
because, after all, they are here in the room, OK,
278
836000
3000
14:17
and they didn't come in the door.
279
839000
1000
14:18
They just pass through anything.
280
840000
2000
14:20
They can come through the building, through the Earth --
281
842000
2000
14:22
they're so non-interacting.
282
844000
2000
14:24
So one way to look for them is to build detectors
283
846000
3000
14:27
that are extremely sensitive to a dark matter particle coming through and bumping it.
284
849000
4000
14:31
So a crystal that will ring if that happens.
285
853000
3000
14:34
So one of my colleagues up the road and his collaborators
286
856000
2000
14:36
have built such a detector.
287
858000
2000
14:38
And they've put it deep down in an iron mine in Minnesota,
288
860000
3000
14:41
OK, deep under the ground, and in fact, in the last couple of days
289
863000
3000
14:44
announced the most sensitive results so far.
290
866000
3000
14:47
They haven't seen anything, OK, but it puts limits on what the mass
291
869000
3000
14:50
and the interaction strength of these dark matter particles are.
292
872000
3000
14:53
There's going to be a satellite telescope launched later this year
293
875000
4000
14:57
and it will look towards the middle of the galaxy,
294
879000
3000
15:00
to see if we can see dark matter particles annihilating
295
882000
2000
15:02
and producing gamma rays that could be detected with this.
296
884000
4000
15:06
The Large Hadron Collider, a particle physics accelerator,
297
888000
3000
15:09
that we'll be turning on later this year.
298
891000
3000
15:12
It is possible that dark matter particles might be produced
299
894000
3000
15:15
at the Large Hadron Collider.
300
897000
2000
15:17
Now, because they are so non-interactive,
301
899000
1000
15:18
they will actually escape the detector,
302
900000
3000
15:21
so their signature will be missing energy, OK.
303
903000
3000
15:24
Now, unfortunately, there is a lot of new physics
304
906000
3000
15:27
whose signature could be missing energy,
305
909000
2000
15:29
so it will be hard to tell the difference.
306
911000
2000
15:31
And finally, for future endeavors, there are telescopes being designed
307
913000
5000
15:36
specifically to address the questions of dark matter and dark energy --
308
918000
4000
15:40
ground-based telescopes, and there are three space-based telescopes
309
922000
3000
15:43
that are in competition right now
310
925000
2000
15:45
to be launched to investigate dark matter and dark energy.
311
927000
3000
15:48
So in terms of the big questions:
312
930000
2000
15:50
what is dark matter? What is dark energy?
313
932000
2000
15:52
The big questions facing physics.
314
934000
2000
15:54
And I'm sure you have lots of questions,
315
936000
3000
15:57
which I very much look forward to addressing
316
939000
2000
15:59
over the next 72 hours, while I'm here. Thank you.
317
941000
2000
16:01
(Applause)
318
943000
3000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Patricia Burchat - Particle physicistPatricia Burchat studies the structure and distribution of dark matter and dark energy. These mysterious ingredients can't be measured in conventional ways, yet form a quarter of the mass of our universe.
Why you should listen
Patricia Burchat studies the universe's most basic ingredients -- the mysterious dark energy and dark matter that are massively more abundant than the visible stars and galaxies. She is one of the founders of the BaBar Collaboration at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, a project that's hoping to answer the question, "If there are as many anti-particles as there are particles, why can't we see all these anti-particles?"
She's a member of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope project, which will allow scientists to monitor exploding supernovae and determine how fast the universe is expanding -- and map how mass is distributed throughout the universe. She's also part of Fermilab Experiment E791, studying the production and decay of charmed particles. Burchat received a Guggenheim Fellowship in 2005.
Patricia Burchat | Speaker | TED.com