ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Thomas Goetz - Healthcare communicator
Thomas Goetz is the co-founder of Iodine and author of "The Decision Tree: Taking Control of Your Health in the New Era of Personalized Medicine.”

Why you should listen

Thomas Goetz is the co-founder of Iodine, a new company that gives consumers better information -- and better visualizations -- of their health data. The former executive editor of Wired, Goetz has a Master's of Public Health from UC Berkeley. In 2010 he published The Decision Tree, a fascinating look at modern medical decisionmaking and technology. Former FDA commissioner Dr. David Kessler called the book "a game changer.” His next book, The Remedy, explores the germ theory of disease and the quest to cure tuberculosis.

More profile about the speaker
Thomas Goetz | Speaker | TED.com
TEDMED 2010

Thomas Goetz: It's time to redesign medical data

托马斯. 高兹:改改这难懂的医学数据

Filmed:
587,895 views

你的病例:好比天书,令人不知所云--上面布满了有用的信息,但前提是你必须能看懂。在TEDMED系列演讲中,托马斯. 高兹大胆地提出重新设计医学数据,使之更清楚明了。
- Healthcare communicator
Thomas Goetz is the co-founder of Iodine and author of "The Decision Tree: Taking Control of Your Health in the New Era of Personalized Medicine.” Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:15
I'm going to be talking to you
0
0
2000
我准备和大家探讨
00:17
about how we can tap龙头
1
2000
2000
我们如何
00:19
a really underutilized未充分利用 resource资源 in health健康 care关心,
2
4000
2000
开发一种没有得到有效利用的医疗资源,
00:21
which哪一个 is the patient患者,
3
6000
2000
那就是病人,
00:23
or, as I like to use the scientific科学 term术语,
4
8000
3000
或者,用一个更专业的术语来说--
00:26
people.
5
11000
2000
人。
00:28
Because we are all patients耐心, we are all people.
6
13000
2000
我们都是病人,我们也都是人。
00:30
Even doctors医生 are patients耐心 at some point.
7
15000
2000
就连医生有时候也可能成为病人。
00:32
So I want to talk about that
8
17000
2000
我想借此机会
00:34
as an opportunity机会
9
19000
2000
告诉大家
00:36
that we really have failed失败 to engage从事 with very well in this country国家
10
21000
3000
在这个国家,我们一直没有很好地配合治疗
00:39
and, in fact事实, worldwide全世界.
11
24000
2000
事实上,全世界都是如此。
00:41
If you want to get at the big part部分 --
12
26000
2000
如果你从全局来看--
00:43
I mean from a public上市 health健康 level水平, where my training训练 is --
13
28000
3000
也就是从公共卫生高度来看,这是我的专业--
00:46
you're looking at behavioral行为的 issues问题.
14
31000
2000
这其实是行为问题,
00:48
You're looking at things where people are actually其实 given特定 information信息,
15
33000
3000
是人们得到相关信息,
00:51
and they're not following以下 through通过 with it.
16
36000
2000
却没有完全按照这些信息行事。
00:53
It's a problem问题 that manifests舱单 itself本身 in diabetes糖尿病,
17
38000
4000
这个问题反应在糖尿病,
00:57
obesity肥胖, many许多 forms形式 of heart disease疾病,
18
42000
2000
肥胖症,各种心脏疾病,
00:59
even some forms形式 of cancer癌症 -- when you think of smoking抽烟.
19
44000
3000
甚至某些癌症--如果人吸烟的话。
01:02
Those are all behaviors行为 where people know what they're supposed应该 to do.
20
47000
3000
对于这些,人们都知道他们应该怎么做才是对的。
01:05
They know what they're supposed应该 to be doing,
21
50000
2000
但是,尽管他们知道哪些事情该做,
01:07
but they're not doing it.
22
52000
2000
他们就是不去做。
01:09
Now behavior行为 change更改 is something
23
54000
2000
行为上的改变
01:11
that is a long-standing由来已久 problem问题 in medicine医学.
24
56000
2000
是医学上的一个顽固问题。
01:13
It goes all the way back to Aristotle亚里士多德.
25
58000
2000
这可以追溯到亚里士多德的时代。
01:15
And doctors医生 hate讨厌 it, right?
26
60000
2000
医生们对此深恶痛绝。
01:17
I mean, they complain抱怨 about it all the time.
27
62000
2000
他们总是为此而抱怨。
01:19
We talk about it in terms条款 of engagement订婚, or non-compliance不遵守.
28
64000
3000
他们把如下行为归为不配合治疗。
01:22
When people don't take their pills,
29
67000
2000
有些人不按要求吃药,
01:24
when people don't follow跟随 doctors'医生 orders命令 --
30
69000
2000
有些人不听从医嘱。
01:26
these are behavior行为 problems问题.
31
71000
2000
这些都是行为问题。
01:28
But for as much as clinical临床 medicine医学
32
73000
2000
但是尽管临床医学
01:30
agonizes激动 over behavior行为 change更改,
33
75000
2000
对病人的行为怨声载道,
01:32
there's not a lot of work doneDONE
34
77000
2000
却并没有拿出实际行动
01:34
in terms条款 of trying to fix固定 that problem问题.
35
79000
3000
来解决这个问题。
01:37
So the crux症结 of it
36
82000
2000
问题的关键
01:39
comes down to this notion概念 of decision-making做决定 --
37
84000
2000
在于如何帮助人们做出正确决定--
01:41
giving information信息 to people in a form形成
38
86000
2000
给病人一张显示信息的表格,
01:43
that doesn't just educate教育 them
39
88000
2000
这张表格不仅教育
01:45
or inform通知 them,
40
90000
2000
或告知病人应该做什么,
01:47
but actually其实 leads引线 them to make better decisions决定,
41
92000
2000
而应引导人们在生活中作出更好的决定
01:49
better choices选择 in their lives生活.
42
94000
2000
和更好的选择。
01:51
One part部分 of medicine医学, though虽然,
43
96000
2000
然而,有一个医学的领域
01:53
has faced面对 the problem问题 of behavior行为 change更改 pretty漂亮 well,
44
98000
4000
在行为改变方面颇有建树。
01:57
and that's dentistry牙科.
45
102000
2000
那就是牙科。
01:59
Dentistry牙科 might威力 seem似乎 -- and I think it is --
46
104000
2000
牙科虽然看起来--个人意见--
02:01
many许多 dentists牙医 would have to acknowledge确认
47
106000
2000
许多牙医可能会认为
02:03
it's somewhat有些 of a mundane平凡 backwater回水 of medicine医学.
48
108000
2000
牙科是医学中最没有发展前景的分支。
02:05
Not a lot of cool, sexy性感的 stuff东东 happening事件 in dentistry牙科.
49
110000
3000
牙科领域没有太多新奇有趣的事情发生。
02:08
But they have really taken采取 this problem问题 of behavior行为 change更改
50
113000
3000
但是,牙科却很好地解决了
02:11
and solved解决了 it.
51
116000
2000
行为改变这个问题。
02:13
It's the one great preventive预防 health健康 success成功
52
118000
2000
这是医疗系统中
02:15
we have in our health健康 care关心 system系统.
53
120000
2000
我们在预防方面所取得的重大成功。
02:17
People brush and floss their teeth.
54
122000
2000
人人都刷牙,使用牙线。
02:19
They don't do it as much as they should, but they do it.
55
124000
3000
他们虽然做得还不够多,但至少他们做了。
02:22
So I'm going to talk about one experiment实验
56
127000
2000
我下面会介绍一些牙科医生三十年前
02:24
that a few少数 dentists牙医 in Connecticut康涅狄格
57
129000
2000
在康涅狄格州
02:26
cooked up about 30 years年份 ago.
58
131000
2000
所做的一个试验。
02:28
So this is an old experiment实验, but it's a really good one,
59
133000
2000
这个试验有一定年头了,但却是一个非常棒的试验,
02:30
because it was very simple简单,
60
135000
2000
这个试验很简单,
02:32
so it's an easy简单 story故事 to tell.
61
137000
2000
所以故事很简短。
02:34
So these Connecticut康涅狄格 dentists牙医 decided决定
62
139000
2000
康涅狄格州的这些牙医决定
02:36
that they wanted to get people to brush their teeth and floss their teeth more often经常,
63
141000
3000
他们要让人们更加勤刷牙勤用牙线。
02:39
and they were going to use one variable变量:
64
144000
2000
他们打算使用一个变量:
02:41
they wanted to scare them.
65
146000
2000
他们想吓唬人们。
02:43
They wanted to tell them how bad it would be
66
148000
3000
他们想告诉人们
02:46
if they didn't brush and floss their teeth.
67
151000
2000
如果不刷牙不用牙线,会有什么样的后果。
02:48
They had a big patient患者 population人口.
68
153000
3000
他们的病人很多。
02:51
They divided分为 them up into two groups.
69
156000
2000
他们这些病人分成两组。
02:53
They had a low-fear低恐惧 population人口,
70
158000
2000
一组是低恐惧人群,
02:55
where they basically基本上 gave them a 13-minute-分钟 presentation介绍,
71
160000
2000
他们给这些人做了一个十三分钟的演示,
02:57
all based基于 in science科学,
72
162000
2000
完全依照科学事实进行,
02:59
but told them that, if you didn't brush and floss your teeth,
73
164000
3000
但是,对他们说,如果你不刷牙,用牙线,
03:02
you could get gum disease疾病. If you get gum disease疾病, you will lose失去 your teeth,
74
167000
3000
你就会得牙龈疾病。如果你的牙龈除了毛病,你的牙齿就会脱落,
03:05
but you'll你会 get dentures假牙, and it won't惯于 be that bad.
75
170000
2000
但是,如果你安了假牙,问题就不大。
03:07
So that was the low-fear低恐惧 group.
76
172000
2000
这是针对低恐惧群体的做法。
03:09
The high-fear高恐惧 group, they laid铺设 it on really thick.
77
174000
3000
而对高恐惧群体,他们可下了狠药。
03:12
They showed显示 bloody血腥 gums齿龈.
78
177000
2000
他们给这些人展示血淋淋的牙龈,
03:14
They showed显示 puss oozing渗血 out from between之间 their teeth.
79
179000
3000
让他们看牙齿间淤出来的脓,
03:17
They told them that their teeth were going to fall秋季 out.
80
182000
2000
告诉他们,他们的牙齿很快就会脱落,
03:19
They said that they could have infections感染
81
184000
2000
他们会得炎症
03:21
that would spread传播 from their jaws to other parts部分 of their bodies身体,
82
186000
3000
并且炎症会从空腔扩散到其它身体部位,
03:24
and ultimately最终, yes, they would lose失去 their teeth.
83
189000
2000
最后,当然,他们会失去自己的牙齿。
03:26
They would get dentures假牙, and if you got dentures假牙,
84
191000
2000
他们不得不使用假牙,如果你装了假牙,
03:28
you weren't going to be able能够 to eat corn-on-the-cob玉米上的棒子,
85
193000
2000
你不能啃玉米棒,
03:30
you weren't going to be able能够 to eat apples苹果,
86
195000
2000
不能咬苹果,
03:32
you weren't going to be able能够 to eat steak牛扒.
87
197000
2000
不能吃牛排;
03:34
You'll你会 eat mush浓粥 for the rest休息 of your life.
88
199000
2000
在你的下半生里你只能吃糊状物
03:36
So go brush and floss your teeth.
89
201000
3000
还不赶快刷牙,用牙线。
03:39
That was the message信息. That was the experiment实验.
90
204000
2000
这就是其中的信息;这个试验就是这样的。
03:41
Now they measured测量 one other variable变量.
91
206000
2000
接着他们测量了另一个变量。
03:43
They wanted to capture捕获 one other variable变量,
92
208000
2000
他们想测试这个变量是否起作用,
03:45
which哪一个 was the patients'耐心' sense of efficacy功效.
93
210000
3000
那就是病人的自我效能感。
03:48
This was the notion概念 of whether是否 the patients耐心 felt
94
213000
2000
这是病人是否认为自己
03:50
that they actually其实 would go ahead and brush and floss their teeth.
95
215000
3000
会去刷牙和使用牙线的观念。
03:53
So they asked them at the beginning开始,
96
218000
2000
在一开始,他们问病人,
03:55
"Do you think you'll你会 actually其实 be able能够 to stick with this program程序?"
97
220000
2000
“你认为你会坚持照做吗?”
03:57
And the people who said, "Yeah, yeah. I'm pretty漂亮 good about that,"
98
222000
2000
那些说“是的,是的,我会好好做的,”的人
03:59
they were characterized特征 as high efficacy功效,
99
224000
2000
属于为高效能感人群。
04:01
and the people who said,
100
226000
2000
而那些说
04:03
"Eh, I never get around to brushing刷牙 and flossing使用牙线 as much as I should,"
101
228000
2000
“呃,我平时刷牙或用牙线都不够勤,”的人
04:05
they were characterized特征 as low efficacy功效.
102
230000
2000
属于低效能感人群。
04:07
So the upshot结果 was this.
103
232000
3000
这是结果。
04:10
The upshot结果 of this experiment实验
104
235000
2000
试验的结果是
04:12
was that fear恐惧 was not really a primary driver司机
105
237000
3000
恐惧并不是控制行为的
04:15
of the behavior行为 at all.
106
240000
2000
主要动力。
04:17
The people who brushed and flossed牙线 their teeth
107
242000
2000
那些勤刷牙,用牙线的人,
04:19
were not necessarily一定 the people
108
244000
2000
并不一定是
04:21
who were really scared害怕 about what would happen发生 --
109
246000
2000
那些害怕不良后果的人--
04:23
it's the people who simply只是 felt that they had the capacity容量
110
248000
3000
他们是那些认为自己
04:26
to change更改 their behavior行为.
111
251000
2000
有能力改变自己行为的人。
04:28
So fear恐惧 showed显示 up as not really the driver司机.
112
253000
3000
恐惧原来不是动因;
04:31
It was the sense of efficacy功效.
113
256000
3000
应该是自我感觉。
04:34
So I want to isolate隔离 this,
114
259000
2000
我想重点指出这个结果,
04:36
because it was a great observation意见 --
115
261000
2000
应为这是非常有用的发现--
04:38
30 years年份 ago, right, 30 years年份 ago --
116
263000
2000
三十年前,对,三十前--
04:40
and it's one that's laid铺设 fallow休耕 in research研究.
117
265000
3000
这是当时尚未被研究的课题。
04:43
It was a notion概念 that really came来了 out
118
268000
2000
这实际上是从阿尔伯特. 班杜拉的研究中
04:45
of Albert阿尔伯特 Bandura's班杜拉 work,
119
270000
2000
引申出来的一个概念,
04:47
who studied研究 whether是否
120
272000
2000
他研究了
04:49
people could get a sense of empowerment权力.
121
274000
3000
人们是否会产生一种成就感。
04:52
The notion概念 of efficacy功效 basically基本上 boils down to one -- that
122
277000
3000
效能感的信念最终归结到一点:
04:55
if somebody believes相信 that they have the capacity容量 to change更改 their behavior行为.
123
280000
3000
一个人是否相信他有能力改变自己的行为。
04:58
In health健康 care关心 terms条款, you could characterize表征 this
124
283000
3000
从医疗保健的角度看,可以这样描述这个信念:
05:01
as whether是否 or not somebody feels感觉
125
286000
2000
一个人是否感觉
05:03
that they see a path路径 towards better health健康,
126
288000
2000
他看到更好的健康状况的前景,
05:05
that they can actually其实 see their way towards getting得到 better health健康,
127
290000
2000
看到自己的健康状况能够日渐转好。
05:07
and that's a very important重要 notion概念.
128
292000
2000
这是个非常重要的信念。
05:09
It's an amazing惊人 notion概念.
129
294000
2000
非常奇妙的信念。
05:11
We don't really know how to manipulate操作 it, though虽然, that well.
130
296000
3000
然而,我们还不知道怎样自如地控制这个信念。
05:14
Except, maybe we do.
131
299000
3000
或许,我们知道。
05:17
So fear恐惧 doesn't work, right? Fear恐惧 doesn't work.
132
302000
2000
恐惧是不起作用的,对,恐惧不起作用。
05:19
And this is a great example
133
304000
2000
这里有一个很好的例子,
05:21
of how we haven't没有 learned学到了 that lesson at all.
134
306000
3000
证明了我们有多么不知悔改。
05:24
This is a campaign运动 from the American美国 Diabetes糖尿病 Association协会.
135
309000
3000
这是美国糖尿病协会的一次活动。
05:27
This is still the way we're communicating通信 messages消息 about health健康.
136
312000
3000
这仍然是我们传递保健信息的方式。
05:30
I mean, I showed显示 my three-year-old三十岁 this slide滑动 last night,
137
315000
3000
我昨晚给我三岁的儿子看了这张幻灯片,
05:33
and he's like, "Papa爸爸, why is an ambulance救护车 in these people's人们 homes家园?"
138
318000
4000
他问:“爸爸,为什么这些人把救护车停在家里啊?”
05:37
And I had to explain说明, "They're trying to scare people."
139
322000
3000
我只能解释道:“他们想吓唬人。”
05:40
And I don't know if it works作品.
140
325000
2000
我不确定这么做是否起作用。
05:42
Now here's这里的 what does work:
141
327000
2000
而这才是起作用的做法,
05:44
personalized个性化 information信息 works作品.
142
329000
2000
那就是个人化信息。
05:46
Again, Bandura班杜拉 recognized认可 this
143
331000
2000
又是班杜拉,
05:48
years年份 ago, decades几十年 ago.
144
333000
2000
他在几年前,甚至几十年前认识到了这一点。
05:50
When you give people specific具体 information信息
145
335000
2000
当你给人们提供
05:52
about their health健康, where they stand,
146
337000
2000
关于他们健康状况的具体信息,他们的目前的病情,
05:54
and where they want to get to, where they might威力 get to,
147
339000
2000
以及他们预期的进展,他们可能的进展,
05:56
that path路径, that notion概念 of a path路径 --
148
341000
2000
这个过程,对此过程的信念,
05:58
that tends趋向 to work for behavior行为 change更改.
149
343000
2000
会改变病人的行为。
06:00
So let me just spool it out a little bit.
150
345000
2000
我来解释一下。
06:02
So you start开始 with personalized个性化 data数据, personalized个性化 information信息
151
347000
3000
你得到一个病人的个人数据,
06:05
that comes from an individual个人,
152
350000
2000
个人信息之后,
06:07
and then you need to connect it to their lives生活.
153
352000
3000
你必须把它与病人的生活联系起来。
06:10
You need to connect it to their lives生活,
154
355000
2000
你需要通过让他们了解这些信息
06:12
hopefully希望 not in a fear-based基于恐惧 way, but one that they understand理解.
155
357000
2000
来把信息与他们的生活联系起来,而不是吓唬他们。
06:14
Okay, I know where I sit. I know where I'm situated位于.
156
359000
3000
好,我知道我的病情。
06:17
And that doesn't just work for me in terms条款 of abstract抽象 numbers数字 --
157
362000
3000
那些抽象的数字,
06:20
this overload超载 of health健康 information信息
158
365000
2000
还有摆在面前的
06:22
that we're inundated淹没 with.
159
367000
2000
那一大堆健康信息让我摸不着头脑,
06:24
But it actually其实 hits点击 home.
160
369000
2000
但这对我影响巨大。
06:26
It's not just hitting us in our heads; it's hitting us in our hearts心中.
161
371000
2000
这些信息不仅进入我们的头脑,还影响到我们的心理。
06:28
There's an emotional情绪化 connection连接 to information信息
162
373000
2000
我们对这些信息有不解的情结,
06:30
because it's from us.
163
375000
2000
因为这是关于我们自己的信息。
06:32
That information信息 then needs需求 to be connected连接的 to choices选择,
164
377000
3000
接着我们要把信息与人们的选择,
06:35
needs需求 to be connected连接的 to a range范围 of options选项,
165
380000
2000
选择的范围,
06:37
directions方向 that we might威力 go to --
166
382000
2000
以及方向联系起来--
06:39
trade-offs权衡, benefits好处.
167
384000
2000
其中有哪些利弊。
06:41
Finally最后, we need to be presented呈现 with a clear明确 point of action行动.
168
386000
3000
最后,我们要清楚明了地告知人们他们应采取什么行动。
06:44
We need to connect the information信息
169
389000
2000
我们必须时刻把信息与行动
06:46
always with the action行动,
170
391000
2000
联系起来,
06:48
and then that action行动 feeds供稿 back
171
393000
2000
行动会产生反馈,
06:50
into different不同 information信息,
172
395000
2000
从而得到新的信息,
06:52
and it creates创建, of course课程, a feedback反馈 loop循环.
173
397000
2000
周而复始,形成一个反馈圈。
06:54
Now this is a very well-observed公观察 and well-established成熟 notion概念
174
399000
3000
实践证实,这个信念对于改变行为
06:57
for behavior行为 change更改.
175
402000
2000
十分可靠。
06:59
But the problem问题 is that things -- in the upper-right右上方 corner there --
176
404000
3000
然而,问题是,右上角的
07:02
personalized个性化 data数据, it's been pretty漂亮 hard to come by.
177
407000
2000
个人数据,往往很难得到。
07:04
It's a difficult and expensive昂贵 commodity商品,
178
409000
3000
得到个人数据可谓困难重重,而且要花不少钱。
07:07
until直到 now.
179
412000
2000
直到现在。
07:09
So I'm going to give you an example, a very simple简单 example of how this works作品.
180
414000
3000
我接下来要给大家看一个例子,这个简单的例子展示我们如何得到个人数据。
07:12
So we've我们已经 all seen看到 these. These are the "your speed速度 limit限制" signs迹象.
181
417000
3000
我们都见过这些标示牌,这些是限速牌。
07:15
You've seen看到 them all around,
182
420000
2000
我们随处都能看到这些牌子,
07:17
especially特别 these days as radars雷达 are cheaper便宜.
183
422000
2000
尤其在雷达价格越发便宜的现在。
07:19
And here's这里的 how they work in the feedback反馈 loop循环.
184
424000
2000
它们在反馈圈中是这样起作用的。
07:21
So you start开始 with the personalized个性化 data数据
185
426000
2000
一开始是个性化数据,
07:23
where the speed速度 limit限制 on the road that you are at that point
186
428000
2000
此时你所在公路的限速
07:25
is 25,
187
430000
2000
是25,
07:27
and, of course课程, you're going faster更快 than that.
188
432000
2000
当然你有些超速了。
07:29
We always are. We're always going above以上 the speed速度 limit限制.
189
434000
3000
我们总是超速的。
07:32
The choice选择 in this case案件 is pretty漂亮 simple简单.
190
437000
2000
在此情况下我们只有两种选择。
07:34
We either keep going fast快速, or we slow down.
191
439000
2000
我们要么保持原速,要么减速。
07:36
We should probably大概 slow down,
192
441000
2000
我们或许应该减速,
07:38
and that point of action行动 is probably大概 now.
193
443000
2000
那么,现在就行动。
07:40
We should take our foot脚丫子 off the pedal踏板 right now,
194
445000
3000
我们应该马上放松油门。
07:43
and generally通常 we do. These things are shown显示 to be pretty漂亮 effective有效
195
448000
3000
我们一般都会这么做;这些限速牌非常有效地
07:46
in terms条款 of getting得到 people to slow down.
196
451000
2000
提醒了人们要减速。
07:48
They reduce减少 speeds速度 by about five to 10 percent百分.
197
453000
2000
他们将速度降低了百分之十。
07:50
They last for about five miles英里,
198
455000
2000
并且减速能坚持五英里路程,
07:52
in which哪一个 case案件 we put our foot脚丫子 back on the pedal踏板.
199
457000
2000
接着我们才会再次踩油门。
07:54
But it works作品, and it even has some health健康 repercussions反响.
200
459000
2000
但在还是起作用了,甚至还有益于身心健康。
07:56
Your blood血液 pressure压力 might威力 drop下降 a little bit.
201
461000
2000
你的血压可能没那么高了。
07:58
Maybe there's fewer accidents事故, so there's public上市 health健康 benefits好处.
202
463000
3000
可能交通事故减少了,造福了公众健康。
08:01
But by and large, this is a feedback反馈 loop循环
203
466000
2000
但是,总的来看,这是个
08:03
that's so nifty俏皮的 and too rare罕见.
204
468000
3000
难得的一流反馈圈。
08:06
Because in health健康 care关心, most health健康 care关心,
205
471000
2000
因为在医疗保健方面,大多数情况下,
08:08
the data数据 is very removed去除 from the action行动.
206
473000
3000
数据与行动相互分离。
08:11
It's very difficult to line线 things up so neatly整洁.
207
476000
3000
很难把事情理得那么顺。
08:14
But we have an opportunity机会.
208
479000
2000
但是我们有一线希望。
08:16
So I want to talk about, I want to shift转移 now to think about
209
481000
2000
我想将话题转移,来探讨
08:18
how we deliver交付 health健康 information信息 in this country国家,
210
483000
2000
在我国,我们如何传递健康信息,
08:20
how we actually其实 get information信息.
211
485000
3000
以及我们如何获取信息。
08:23
This is a pharmaceutical制药 ad广告.
212
488000
3000
这是一个药品广告。
08:26
Actually其实, it's a spoof欺骗. It's not a real真实 pharmaceutical制药 ad广告.
213
491000
2000
这实际上是在耍花腔;而不是真正的药品广告。
08:28
Nobody's没有人的 had the brilliant辉煌 idea理念
214
493000
2000
还没有人聪明到用”Havidol“
08:30
of calling调用 their drug药物 HavidolHavidol quite相当 yet然而.
215
495000
3000
来给药品命名的。
08:34
But it looks容貌 completely全然 right.
216
499000
2000
但是它看起来完全没问题。
08:36
So it's exactly究竟 the way we get
217
501000
2000
这就是我们
08:38
health健康 information信息 and pharmaceutical制药 information信息,
218
503000
3000
得到健康信息和药品信息的方式,
08:41
and it just sounds声音 perfect完善.
219
506000
2000
看上去完美无缺。
08:43
And then we turn the page of the magazine杂志,
220
508000
2000
当翻开杂志,
08:45
and we see this --
221
510000
3000
我们看到这样一页,对吧。
08:48
now this is the page the FDAFDA requires要求 pharmaceutical制药 companies公司
222
513000
3000
食品及药物管理局要求制药公司
08:51
to put into their ads广告, or to follow跟随 their ads广告,
223
516000
3000
把这一页放进他们广告中,或加在广告后面。
08:54
and to me, this is one of the most
cynical愤世嫉俗的 exercises演习 in medicine医学.
224
519000
4000
对于我而言,这是医学界一大倍受诟病的做法。
08:58
Because we know.
225
523000
2000
因为我们知道,
09:00
Who among其中 us would actually其实 say that people read this?
226
525000
2000
我们中间有谁认为人们会读这一页?
09:02
And who among其中 us would actually其实 say
227
527000
2000
有谁认为
09:04
that people who do try to read this
228
529000
2000
那些读了这一页的人
09:06
actually其实 get anything out of it?
229
531000
2000
能够得到任何有用信息?
09:08
This is a bankrupt破产者 effort功夫
230
533000
2000
这是医疗信息沟通的
09:10
at communicating通信 health健康 information信息.
231
535000
3000
昏庸之举。
09:13
There is no good faith信仰 in this.
232
538000
2000
没有人会买账。
09:15
So this is a different不同 approach途径.
233
540000
2000
而这是另一种方式。
09:17
This is an approach途径 that has been developed发达
234
542000
3000
这种方式是由
09:20
by a couple一对 researchers研究人员 at Dartmouth达特茅斯 Medical School学校,
235
545000
3000
达特茅斯医学院的几位研究人员所开发。
09:23
Lisa丽莎 Schwartz施瓦茨 and Steven史蒂芬 WoloshinWoloshin.
236
548000
2000
他们是莉莎. 史沃兹和史蒂芬. 沃罗森。
09:25
And they created创建 this thing called the "drug药物 facts事实 box."
237
550000
3000
他们的这个发明叫做药物成分说明表。
09:28
They took inspiration灵感 from, of all things,
238
553000
2000
出乎人意料的是,他们的灵感来自
09:30
Cap'n头儿 Crunch紧缩.
239
555000
2000
Cap‘n Crunch麦片。
09:32
They went to the nutritional营养 information信息 box
240
557000
3000
他们看到上面的营养成分介绍,
09:35
and saw that what works作品 for cereal谷类, works作品 for our food餐饮,
241
560000
3000
并意识到麦片,食物的成分介绍,
09:38
actually其实 helps帮助 people understand理解 what's in their food餐饮.
242
563000
3000
实际上有助于人们了解他们食物中有哪些成分。
09:42
God forbid禁止 we should use that same相同 standard标准
243
567000
2000
我们怎么就没想到,
09:44
that we make Cap'n头儿 Crunch紧缩 live生活 by
244
569000
2000
可以把Cap'n Crunch麦片的成分介绍模式
09:46
and bring带来 it to drug药物 companies公司.
245
571000
3000
推广到制药公司。
09:49
So let me just walk步行 through通过 this quickly很快.
246
574000
2000
我快速给大家展示一下。
09:51
It says very clearly明确地 what the drug药物 is for, specifically特别 who it is good for,
247
576000
3000
它清清楚楚地说明了该药的用途,使用对象,
09:54
so you can start开始 to personalize个性化 your understanding理解
248
579000
2000
这样你就可以对号入座,
09:56
of whether是否 the information信息 is relevant相应 to you
249
581000
2000
看上面的信息是否与你的情况相符,
09:58
or whether是否 the drug药物 is relevant相应 to you.
250
583000
2000
这药是否适合你服用。
10:00
You can understand理解 exactly究竟 what the benefits好处 are.
251
585000
3000
你能够清楚地了解服药之后会有哪些好处。
10:03
It isn't this kind of vague模糊 promise诺言 that it's going to work no matter what,
252
588000
3000
它并没有含糊地承诺,无论怎样都能药到病除,
10:06
but you get the statistics统计 for how effective有效 it is.
253
591000
3000
但是你可以通过数据来了解药的效果。
10:09
And finally最后, you understand理解 what those choices选择 are.
254
594000
3000
最后,你明确了自己有哪些选择。
10:12
You can start开始 to unpack解压 the choices选择 involved参与
255
597000
2000
你可以开始挑拣有关的选择,
10:14
because of the side effects效果.
256
599000
2000
因为你要考虑到药的副作用。
10:16
Every一切 time you take a drug药物, you're walking步行 into a possible可能 side effect影响.
257
601000
3000
每一次吃药,你都有可能面临某种副作用。
10:19
So it spells法术 those out in very clean清洁 terms条款,
258
604000
2000
它明明白白地列出了可能的副作用。
10:21
and that works作品.
259
606000
2000
这很管用。
10:23
So I love this. I love that drug药物 facts事实 box.
260
608000
2000
我特别喜欢这个药物说明表。
10:25
And so I was thinking思维 about,
261
610000
2000
于是,我在思考,
10:27
what's an opportunity机会 that I could have
262
612000
2000
我怎样才能
10:29
to help people understand理解 information信息?
263
614000
3000
帮助人们理解信息呢?
10:32
What's another另一个 latent body身体 of information信息 that's out there
264
617000
4000
还有哪个未被充分理解的信息源
10:36
that people are really not putting to use?
265
621000
3000
让人们无所适从呢?
10:39
And so I came来了 up with this: lab实验室 test测试 results结果.
266
624000
3000
于是,我想到了这个:实验室检测结果。
10:42
Blood血液 test测试 results结果 are this great source资源 of information信息.
267
627000
3000
这一大堆信息是血液检测的结果。
10:45
They're packed打包 with information信息.
268
630000
2000
上面满满的都是信息。
10:47
They're just not for us. They're not for people. They're not for patients耐心.
269
632000
3000
这不是给我们看的;不是给人们看的;不是给病人看的。
10:50
They go right to doctors医生.
270
635000
2000
是直接给医生看的。
10:52
And God forbid禁止 -- I think many许多 doctors医生, if you really asked them,
271
637000
3000
上帝啊!我敢说,很多医生,如果你问他们,
10:55
they don't really understand理解 all this stuff东东 either.
272
640000
3000
他们也不完全明白这些东西。
10:58
This is the worst最差 presented呈现 information信息.
273
643000
3000
这样的信息表述实在是糟透了。
11:01
You ask Tufte塔夫特, and he would say,
274
646000
3000
如果你问塔夫特,他会说:
11:04
"Yes, this is the absolute绝对 worst最差 presentation介绍 of information信息 possible可能."
275
649000
3000
“毫无疑问,这样的信息表述真是槽糕透顶了。”
11:07
What we did at Wired有线
276
652000
2000
在《连线》(Wired)杂志社,
11:09
was we went, and I got our graphic图像 design设计 department
277
654000
2000
我让我们的图表设计部
11:11
to re-imagine重新想象 these lab实验室 reports报告.
278
656000
2000
对这些测试报告进行重新设计。
11:13
So that's what I want to walk步行 you through通过.
279
658000
2000
我给大家简短地展示一下。
11:15
So this is the general一般 blood血液 work before,
280
660000
3000
这是一项常规血液检测报告原来的版本,
11:18
and this is the after, this is what we came来了 up with.
281
663000
2000
这是修改后的版本,这就是我们的设计。
11:20
The after takes what was four pages网页 --
282
665000
2000
修改后的版本将原来的四页纸--
11:22
that previous以前 slide滑动 was actually其实
283
667000
2000
上一张幻灯片实际上
11:24
the first of four pages网页 of data数据
284
669000
2000
四页纸的第一页,
11:26
that's just the general一般 blood血液 work.
285
671000
2000
这还只是一项常规的血液检测。
11:28
It goes on and on and on, all these values, all these numbers数字 you don't know.
286
673000
3000
全篇洋洋洒洒,那么多的数值,那么多的数字,你根本看不懂。
11:31
This is our one-page一页 summary概要.
287
676000
3000
这是我们一页纸的总结。
11:34
We use the notion概念 of color颜色.
288
679000
2000
我们运用颜色作为信号。
11:36
It's an amazing惊人 notion概念 that color颜色 could be used.
289
681000
3000
颜色的运用真是太妙了。
11:39
So on the top-level顶层 you have your overall总体 results结果,
290
684000
3000
最上面一层是你的测试结果概况,
11:42
the things that might威力 jump out at you from the fine print打印.
291
687000
3000
清晰的印刷让你一目了然。
11:45
Then you can drill钻头 down
292
690000
2000
你接着往下看,
11:47
and understand理解 how actually其实 we put your level水平 in context上下文,
293
692000
3000
我们把你的等级
11:50
and we use color颜色 to illustrate说明
294
695000
2000
用颜色作图解
11:52
exactly究竟 where your value falls下降.
295
697000
2000
标明你的数值在哪一个区域里。
11:54
In this case案件, this patient患者 is slightly at risk风险 of diabetes糖尿病
296
699000
3000
这个案例中的病人有轻微患糖尿病的危险,
11:57
because of their glucose葡萄糖 level水平.
297
702000
2000
因为他的葡萄糖含量。
11:59
Likewise同样, you can go over your lipids血脂
298
704000
2000
类似地,你可以查看你的油脂含量
12:01
and, again, understand理解 what your overall总体 cholesterol胆固醇 level水平 is
299
706000
3000
了解你总体的胆固醇含量,
12:04
and then break打破 down into the HDLHDL and the LDLLDL if you so choose选择.
300
709000
3000
你还可以进一步查看高密度脂蛋白和低密度脂蛋白的情况。
12:07
But again, always using运用 color颜色
301
712000
2000
你看,我们总是使用颜色
12:09
and personalized个性化 proximity接近
302
714000
2000
让那些信息
12:11
to that information信息.
303
716000
2000
更加平易近人。
12:13
All those other values,
304
718000
2000
我们对那一大堆其它数值
12:15
all those pages网页 and pages网页 of values that are full充分 of nothing,
305
720000
2000
那一大叠布满数字但毫无意义的纸
12:17
we summarize总结.
306
722000
2000
作了精简。
12:19
We tell you that you're okay, you're normal正常.
307
724000
2000
我们告诉你,你的情况正常。
12:21
But you don't have to wade through通过 it. You don't have to go through通过 the junk破烂.
308
726000
3000
你用不着在数字的海洋里苦苦寻觅,用不着管那些没用的信息。
12:24
And then we do two other very important重要 things
309
729000
2000
接着我们做了另外两件非常重要的事情,
12:26
that kind of help fill in this feedback反馈 loop循环:
310
731000
2000
这两件事有助于填满这个反馈圈。
12:28
we help people understand理解 in a little more detail详情
311
733000
2000
我们帮助人们进一步理解更多细节,
12:30
what these values are and what they might威力 indicate表明.
312
735000
3000
理解这些数值代表什么,表明了什么。
12:33
And then we go a further进一步 step -- we tell them what they can do.
313
738000
3000
然后,更进一步:我们告诉他们下一步应该做什么。
12:36
We give them some insight眼光
314
741000
2000
我们帮助他们判断
12:38
into what choices选择 they can make, what actions行动 they can take.
315
743000
3000
他们应该做哪些选择,采取哪些行动。
12:41
So that's our general一般 blood血液 work test测试.
316
746000
3000
这就是我们做的常规血液检测报告。
12:44
Then we went to CRPCRP test测试.
317
749000
2000
我们接着开始做CRP检测。
12:46
In this case案件, it's a sin of omission省略.
318
751000
2000
这是一个信息严重缺失的案例。
12:48
They have this huge巨大 amount of space空间,
319
753000
2000
这上面有一大片空白,
12:50
and they don't use it for anything, so we do.
320
755000
2000
没有人用它,我们就把这片空白用上了。
12:52
Now the CRPCRP test测试 is often经常 doneDONE
321
757000
2000
CRP检测往往
12:54
following以下 a cholesterol胆固醇 test测试,
322
759000
2000
跟在胆固醇含量检测之后,
12:56
or in conjunction连词 with a cholesterol胆固醇 test测试.
323
761000
2000
或者与胆固醇含量测试一同进行。
12:58
So we take the bold胆大 step
324
763000
2000
于是我们大胆地
13:00
of putting the cholesterol胆固醇 information信息 on the same相同 page,
325
765000
3000
把胆固醇测试信息印在同一页上,
13:03
which哪一个 is the way the doctor医生 is going to evaluate评估 it.
326
768000
2000
让医生进行诊断。
13:05
So we thought the patient患者 might威力 actually其实 want to know the context上下文 as well.
327
770000
3000
我们想到,病人可能也想看明白其中的玄机。
13:08
It's a protein蛋白 that shows节目 up
328
773000
2000
这是一种维生素,
13:10
when your blood血液 vessels船只 might威力 be inflamed发炎的,
329
775000
2000
当你的血管发炎时,这种维生素就会产生,
13:12
which哪一个 might威力 be a risk风险 for heart disease疾病.
330
777000
2000
有导致心脏病的风险。
13:14
What you're actually其实 measuring测量
331
779000
2000
简单明了的语言
13:16
is spelled拼写 out in clean清洁 language语言.
332
781000
2000
把测试结果解释得清清楚楚。
13:18
Then we use the information信息
333
783000
2000
接着我们用上了
13:20
that's already已经 in the lab实验室 report报告.
334
785000
2000
测试报告上的信息。
13:22
We use the person's人的 age年龄 and their gender性别
335
787000
2000
我们通过病人的年龄与性别
13:24
to start开始 to fill in the personalized个性化 risks风险.
336
789000
3000
对其具体所面临的风险进行评估。
13:27
So we start开始 to use the data数据 we have
337
792000
2000
我们用手上掌握的数据
13:29
to run a very simple简单 calculation计算
338
794000
2000
进行一个非常简单的计算,
13:31
that's on all sorts排序 of online线上 calculators计算器
339
796000
2000
各种网上计算器都能进行这种计算,
13:33
to get a sense of what the actual实际 risk风险 is.
340
798000
3000
最后对实际风险进行预测。
13:36
The last one I'll show显示 you is a PSAPSA test测试.
341
801000
2000
最后我将展示的是PSA(前列腺特异抗原)检测。
13:38
Here's这里的 the before, and here's这里的 the after.
342
803000
3000
这是修改之前,这是之后。
13:41
Now a lot of our effort功夫 on this one --
343
806000
2000
我们在这上面花了不少功夫--
13:43
as many许多 of you probably大概 know,
344
808000
2000
在做许多人可能知道,
13:45
a PSAPSA test测试 is a very controversial争论的 test测试.
345
810000
2000
PSA测试是一种非常具有争议的检测。
13:47
It's used to test测试 for prostate前列腺 cancer癌症,
346
812000
2000
它是用于检测病人是否患上前列腺癌的,
13:49
but there are all sorts排序 of reasons原因
347
814000
2000
但是,引起前列腺肿大的原因
13:51
why your prostate前列腺 might威力 be enlarged放大.
348
816000
2000
是多种多样的。
13:53
And so we spent花费 a good deal合同 of our time
349
818000
2000
于是我们花了不少时间,
13:55
indicating说明 that.
350
820000
2000
研究如何表述测试结果。
13:57
We again personalized个性化 the risks风险.
351
822000
2000
我们再次根据个人情况评估风险。
13:59
So this patient患者 is in their 50s,
352
824000
2000
这是针对五十多岁病人的报告,
14:01
so we can actually其实 give them a very precise精确 estimate估计
353
826000
2000
我们能够非常准确地
14:03
of what their risk风险 for prostate前列腺 cancer癌症 is.
354
828000
2000
评估他们患前列腺癌的风险。
14:05
In this case案件 it's about 25 percent百分, based基于 on that.
355
830000
3000
根据数据显示,这个病例的风险是百分之二十五。
14:08
And then again, the follow-up跟进 actions行动.
356
833000
3000
下面列出了应采取的对策。
14:11
So our cost成本 for this was less than 10,000 dollars美元, all right.
357
836000
3000
我们做这项工作的成本不到一万美元。
14:14
That's what Wired有线 magazine杂志 spent花费 on this.
358
839000
3000
这就是《连线》杂志在这上面的成本。
14:17
Why is Wired有线 magazine杂志 doing this?
359
842000
2000
为什么《连线》杂志要做这样一项工作呢?
14:19
(Laughter笑声)
360
844000
3000
(众人笑)
14:22
Quest寻求 Diagnostics诊断 and LabCorp美国控股实验室公司,
361
847000
2000
两家最大的实验室检测公司,
14:24
the two largest最大 lab实验室 testing测试 companies公司 --
362
849000
3000
奎斯特诊断公司和LabCorp公司:
14:27
last year, they made制作 profits利润 of over 700 million百万 dollars美元
363
852000
3000
去年,他们的利润分别超过了七亿美元,
14:30
and over 500 million百万 dollars美元 respectively分别.
364
855000
3000
和五亿美元。
14:33
Now this is not a problem问题 of resources资源;
365
858000
2000
问题的关键不在于资源,
14:35
this is a problem问题 of incentives奖励.
366
860000
3000
而在于刺激。
14:38
We need to recognize认识 that the target目标 of this information信息
367
863000
3000
我们需要认识到:信息的接收对象
14:41
should not be the doctor医生, should not be the insurance保险 company公司.
368
866000
3000
不应该是医生或保险公司;
14:44
It should be the patient患者.
369
869000
2000
而应是病人。
14:46
It's the person who actually其实, in the end结束,
370
871000
2000
病人,归根结底,
14:48
is going to be having to change更改 their lives生活
371
873000
2000
要改变自己的生活,
14:50
and then start开始 adopting采用 new behaviors行为.
372
875000
2000
并养成新的行为习惯。
14:52
This is information信息 that is incredibly令人难以置信 powerful强大.
373
877000
2000
而信息在其中扮演了举足轻重的角色。
14:54
It's an incredibly令人难以置信 powerful强大 catalyst催化剂 to change更改.
374
879000
3000
这是促成改变的强力催化剂。
14:57
But we're not using运用 it. It's just sitting坐在 there.
375
882000
2000
它近在咫尺,但我们却不去用它。
14:59
It's being存在 lost丢失.
376
884000
2000
它白白被浪费了。
15:01
So I want to just offer提供 four questions问题
377
886000
2000
我想提出四个
15:03
that every一切 patient患者 should ask,
378
888000
2000
病人应该问的问题,
15:05
because I don't actually其实 expect期望 people
379
890000
2000
因为我实际上并不指望
15:07
to start开始 developing发展 these lab实验室 test测试 reports报告.
380
892000
2000
人们自行撰写这些实验室检测报告。
15:09
But you can create创建 your own拥有 feedback反馈 loop循环.
381
894000
2000
但是你可以创造自己的反馈圈。
15:11
Anybody任何人 can create创建 their feedback反馈 loop循环 by asking these simple简单 questions问题:
382
896000
3000
每个人都可以通过问下列简单的问题来创造反馈圈:
15:14
Can I have my results结果?
383
899000
2000
我可以得到我的检测结果吗?
15:16
And the only acceptable接受 answer回答 is --
384
901000
2000
唯一的答案是--
15:18
(Audience听众: Yes.) -- yes.
385
903000
2000
(观众:可以。)--可以。
15:20
What does this mean? Help me understand理解 what the data数据 is.
386
905000
2000
这份报告说明了什么?帮助我理解这些数据都代表什么。
15:22
What are my options选项? What choices选择 are now on the table?
387
907000
3000
我有哪些选择?哪些做法的可行的?
15:25
And then, what's next下一个?
388
910000
2000
接下来我该怎么做?
15:27
How do I integrate整合 this information信息
389
912000
2000
在未来的日子中,
15:29
into the longer course课程 of my life?
390
914000
2000
我如何根据这些信息改变我的生活?
15:32
So I want to wind up by just showing展示
391
917000
2000
最后,我想告诉大家
15:34
that people have the capacity容量 to understand理解 this information信息.
392
919000
2000
人们是有能力理解这些信息的。
15:36
This is not beyond the grasp把握 of ordinary普通 people.
393
921000
3000
这对于平常人来说是完全有可能做到的。
15:39
You do not need to have the education教育 level水平 of people in this room房间.
394
924000
3000
人们并不需要拥有在座各位的教育水平。
15:42
Ordinary普通 people are capable of understanding理解 this information信息,
395
927000
3000
平常人有能力理解这些信息,
15:45
if we only go to the effort功夫 of presenting呈现 it to them
396
930000
3000
只要我们愿意为在信息的表述上多下一些功夫,
15:48
in a form形成 that they can engage从事 with.
397
933000
2000
方便他们理解,让他们参与进来。
15:50
And engagement订婚 is essential必要 here,
398
935000
2000
在此,参与是关键因素,
15:52
because it's not just giving them information信息;
399
937000
2000
因为,光给他们提供信息,意义不大,
15:54
it's giving them an opportunity机会 to act法案.
400
939000
2000
而要给他们行动的机会。
15:56
That's what engagement订婚 is. It's different不同 from compliance合规.
401
941000
2000
这才是真正的参与;不同于服从。
15:58
It works作品 totally完全 different不同 from the way we talk about behavior行为
402
943000
3000
这不同于与我们今天说的
16:01
in medicine医学 today今天.
403
946000
2000
医学上的行为。
16:03
And this information信息 is out there.
404
948000
2000
这信息就在眼前。
16:05
I've been talking today今天 about latent information信息,
405
950000
2000
今天我所探讨的是被掩盖了的信息,
16:07
all this information信息 that exists存在 in the system系统
406
952000
2000
这些信息存在于这个系统之中,
16:09
that we're not putting to use.
407
954000
2000
而我们却没有加以利用。
16:11
But there are all sorts排序 of other bodies身体 of information信息
408
956000
2000
但各种各样的信息
16:13
that are coming未来 online线上,
409
958000
2000
正逐渐在网上涌现。
16:15
and we need to recognize认识 the capacity容量 of this information信息
410
960000
3000
我们需要认识到这信息的力量,
16:18
to engage从事 people, to help people
411
963000
2000
让人们参与进来,帮助人们
16:20
and to change更改 the course课程 of their lives生活.
412
965000
2000
改变他们生命的轨迹。
16:22
Thank you very much.
413
967000
2000
非常感谢
16:24
(Applause掌声)
414
969000
3000
(众人鼓掌)
Translated by Lili Liang
Reviewed by Xinxin Li

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Thomas Goetz - Healthcare communicator
Thomas Goetz is the co-founder of Iodine and author of "The Decision Tree: Taking Control of Your Health in the New Era of Personalized Medicine.”

Why you should listen

Thomas Goetz is the co-founder of Iodine, a new company that gives consumers better information -- and better visualizations -- of their health data. The former executive editor of Wired, Goetz has a Master's of Public Health from UC Berkeley. In 2010 he published The Decision Tree, a fascinating look at modern medical decisionmaking and technology. Former FDA commissioner Dr. David Kessler called the book "a game changer.” His next book, The Remedy, explores the germ theory of disease and the quest to cure tuberculosis.

More profile about the speaker
Thomas Goetz | Speaker | TED.com

Data provided by TED.

This site was created in May 2015 and the last update was on January 12, 2020. It will no longer be updated.

We are currently creating a new site called "eng.lish.video" and would be grateful if you could access it.

If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to write comments in your language on the contact form.

Privacy Policy

Developer's Blog

Buy Me A Coffee