TEDIndia 2009
Pawan Sinha: How brains learn to see
Filmed:
Readability: 4.5
939,209 views
Pawan Sinha details his groundbreaking research into how the brain's visual system develops. Sinha and his team provide free vision-restoring treatment to children born blind, and then study how their brains learn to interpret visual data. The work offers insights into neuroscience, engineering and even autism.
Pawan Sinha - Visual neuroscientist
Pawan Sinha researches how our brains interpret what our eyes see -- and uses that research to give blind children the gift of sight. Full bio
Pawan Sinha researches how our brains interpret what our eyes see -- and uses that research to give blind children the gift of sight. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:15
If you are a blind child in India,
0
0
4000
00:19
you will very likely have to contend with
1
4000
3000
00:22
at least two big pieces of bad news.
2
7000
3000
00:25
The first bad news
3
10000
2000
00:27
is that the chances of getting treatment
4
12000
3000
00:30
are extremely slim to none,
5
15000
3000
00:33
and that's because most of the blindness
6
18000
2000
00:35
alleviation programs in the country
7
20000
2000
00:37
are focused on adults,
8
22000
2000
00:39
and there are very, very few hospitals
9
24000
3000
00:42
that are actually equipped to treat children.
10
27000
3000
00:46
In fact, if you were to be treated,
11
31000
4000
00:51
you might well end up being treated
12
36000
3000
00:54
by a person who has no medical credentials
13
39000
3000
00:57
as this case from Rajasthan illustrates.
14
42000
3000
01:00
This is a three-year-old orphan girl
15
45000
2000
01:02
who had cataracts.
16
47000
2000
01:04
So, her caretakers took her
17
49000
2000
01:06
to the village medicine man,
18
51000
2000
01:08
and instead of suggesting to the caretakers
19
53000
3000
01:11
that the girl be taken to a hospital,
20
56000
3000
01:14
the person decided to burn her abdomen
21
59000
2000
01:16
with red-hot iron bars
22
61000
2000
01:18
to drive out the demons.
23
63000
2000
01:20
The second piece of bad news
24
65000
3000
01:23
will be delivered to you
25
68000
2000
01:25
by neuroscientists, who will tell you
26
70000
3000
01:28
that if you are older than four or five years of age,
27
73000
3000
01:31
that even if you have your eye corrected,
28
76000
3000
01:34
the chances of your brain learning how to see
29
79000
3000
01:37
are very, very slim --
30
82000
2000
01:39
again, slim or none.
31
84000
3000
01:42
So when I heard these two things,
32
87000
2000
01:44
it troubled me deeply,
33
89000
2000
01:46
both because of personal reasons
34
91000
2000
01:48
and scientific reasons.
35
93000
2000
01:50
So let me first start with the personal reason.
36
95000
3000
01:53
It'll sound corny, but it's sincere.
37
98000
3000
01:56
That's my son, Darius.
38
101000
2000
01:58
As a new father,
39
103000
2000
02:00
I have a qualitatively different sense
40
105000
4000
02:04
of just how delicate babies are,
41
109000
3000
02:07
what our obligations are towards them
42
112000
3000
02:10
and how much love
43
115000
2000
02:12
we can feel towards a child.
44
117000
3000
02:15
I would move heaven and earth
45
120000
2000
02:17
in order to get treatment for Darius,
46
122000
3000
02:20
and for me to be told
47
125000
2000
02:22
that there might be other Dariuses
48
127000
2000
02:24
who are not getting treatment,
49
129000
2000
02:26
that's just viscerally wrong.
50
131000
3000
02:29
So that's the personal reason.
51
134000
2000
02:31
Scientific reason is that this notion
52
136000
3000
02:34
from neuroscience of critical periods --
53
139000
2000
02:36
that if the brain is older
54
141000
3000
02:39
than four or five years of age,
55
144000
2000
02:41
it loses its ability to learn --
56
146000
2000
02:43
that doesn't sit well with me,
57
148000
2000
02:45
because I don't think that idea
58
150000
2000
02:47
has been tested adequately.
59
152000
3000
02:50
The birth of the idea is from
60
155000
2000
02:52
David Hubel and Torsten Wiesel's work,
61
157000
2000
02:54
two researchers who were at Harvard,
62
159000
2000
02:56
and they got the Nobel Prize in 1981
63
161000
3000
02:59
for their studies of visual physiology,
64
164000
2000
03:01
which are remarkably beautiful studies,
65
166000
2000
03:03
but I believe some of their work
66
168000
2000
03:05
has been extrapolated
67
170000
2000
03:07
into the human domain prematurely.
68
172000
2000
03:09
So, they did their work with kittens,
69
174000
2000
03:11
with different kinds of deprivation regiments,
70
176000
2000
03:13
and those studies,
71
178000
2000
03:15
which date back to the '60s,
72
180000
2000
03:17
are now being applied to human children.
73
182000
3000
03:20
So I felt that I needed to do two things.
74
185000
3000
03:23
One: provide care
75
188000
3000
03:26
to children who are currently
76
191000
2000
03:28
being deprived of treatment.
77
193000
2000
03:30
That's the humanitarian mission.
78
195000
2000
03:32
And the scientific mission would be
79
197000
2000
03:34
to test the limits
80
199000
2000
03:36
of visual plasticity.
81
201000
2000
03:38
And these two missions, as you can tell,
82
203000
3000
03:41
thread together perfectly. One adds to the other;
83
206000
3000
03:44
in fact, one would be impossible without the other.
84
209000
3000
03:49
So, to implement
85
214000
2000
03:51
these twin missions,
86
216000
2000
03:53
a few years ago, I launched Project Prakash.
87
218000
3000
03:56
Prakash, as many of you know,
88
221000
2000
03:58
is the Sanskrit word for light,
89
223000
2000
04:00
and the idea is that
90
225000
2000
04:02
in bringing light into the lives of children,
91
227000
3000
04:05
we also have a chance
92
230000
2000
04:07
of shedding light on some of the
93
232000
2000
04:09
deepest mysteries of neuroscience.
94
234000
3000
04:12
And the logo -- even though it looks extremely Irish,
95
237000
3000
04:15
it's actually derived from
96
240000
2000
04:17
the Indian symbol of Diya, an earthen lamp.
97
242000
4000
04:21
The Prakash, the overall effort
98
246000
3000
04:24
has three components:
99
249000
2000
04:26
outreach, to identify children in need of care;
100
251000
4000
04:30
medical treatment; and in subsequent study.
101
255000
3000
04:33
And I want to show you a short video clip
102
258000
3000
04:36
that illustrates the first two components of this work.
103
261000
3000
04:41
This is an outreach station
104
266000
2000
04:43
conducted at a school for the blind.
105
268000
3000
04:46
(Text: Most of the children are profoundly and permanently blind ...)
106
271000
5000
04:51
Pawan Sinha: So, because this is a school for the blind,
107
276000
5000
04:56
many children have permanent conditions.
108
281000
2000
04:58
That's a case of microphthalmos,
109
283000
3000
05:01
which is malformed eyes,
110
286000
2000
05:03
and that's a permanent condition;
111
288000
2000
05:05
it cannot be treated.
112
290000
2000
05:07
That's an extreme of micropthalmos
113
292000
2000
05:09
called enophthalmos.
114
294000
2000
05:11
But, every so often, we come across children
115
296000
2000
05:13
who show some residual vision,
116
298000
3000
05:16
and that is a very good sign
117
301000
3000
05:19
that the condition might actually be treatable.
118
304000
2000
05:21
So, after that screening, we bring the children to the hospital.
119
306000
3000
05:24
That's the hospital we're working with in Delhi,
120
309000
2000
05:26
the Schroff Charity Eye Hospital.
121
311000
3000
05:29
It has a very well-equipped
122
314000
2000
05:31
pediatric ophthalmic center,
123
316000
3000
05:35
which was made possible in part
124
320000
2000
05:37
by a gift from the Ronald McDonald charity.
125
322000
4000
05:41
So, eating burgers actually helps.
126
326000
3000
05:45
(Text: Such examinations allow us to improve
127
330000
2000
05:47
eye-health in many children, and ...
128
332000
2000
05:54
... help us find children who can participate in Project Prakash.)
129
339000
3000
05:57
PS: So, as I zoom in to the eyes of this child,
130
342000
2000
05:59
you will see the cause of his blindness.
131
344000
3000
06:03
The whites that you see in the middle of his pupils
132
348000
3000
06:06
are congenital cataracts,
133
351000
3000
06:09
so opacities of the lens.
134
354000
2000
06:11
In our eyes, the lens is clear,
135
356000
3000
06:14
but in this child, the lens has become opaque,
136
359000
2000
06:16
and therefore he can't see the world.
137
361000
3000
06:19
So, the child is given treatment. You'll see shots of the eye.
138
364000
3000
06:22
Here's the eye with the opaque lens,
139
367000
2000
06:24
the opaque lens extracted
140
369000
2000
06:26
and an acrylic lens inserted.
141
371000
3000
06:29
And here's the same child
142
374000
2000
06:31
three weeks post-operation,
143
376000
3000
06:34
with the right eye open.
144
379000
3000
06:40
(Applause)
145
385000
6000
06:46
Thank you.
146
391000
2000
06:48
So, even from that little clip, you can begin to get the sense
147
393000
3000
06:51
that recovery is possible,
148
396000
2000
06:53
and we have now
149
398000
2000
06:55
provided treatment to over 200 children,
150
400000
3000
06:58
and the story repeats itself.
151
403000
2000
07:00
After treatment, the child
152
405000
2000
07:02
gains significant functionality.
153
407000
3000
07:05
In fact, the story holds true
154
410000
3000
07:08
even if you have a person who got sight
155
413000
2000
07:10
after several years of deprivation.
156
415000
2000
07:12
We did a paper a few years ago
157
417000
2000
07:14
about this woman that you see on the right, SRD,
158
419000
4000
07:18
and she got her sight late in life,
159
423000
2000
07:20
and her vision is remarkable at this age.
160
425000
4000
07:24
I should add a tragic postscript to this --
161
429000
3000
07:27
she died two years ago
162
432000
2000
07:29
in a bus accident.
163
434000
2000
07:31
So, hers is just a truly inspiring story --
164
436000
4000
07:35
unknown, but inspiring story.
165
440000
3000
07:38
So when we started finding these results,
166
443000
2000
07:40
as you might imagine, it created quite a bit of stir
167
445000
3000
07:43
in the scientific and the popular press.
168
448000
3000
07:46
Here's an article in Nature
169
451000
2000
07:48
that profiled this work,
170
453000
2000
07:50
and another one in Time.
171
455000
2000
07:52
So, we were fairly convinced -- we are convinced --
172
457000
2000
07:54
that recovery is feasible,
173
459000
2000
07:56
despite extended visual deprivation.
174
461000
3000
07:59
The next obvious question to ask:
175
464000
2000
08:01
What is the process of recovery?
176
466000
3000
08:04
So, the way we study that is,
177
469000
3000
08:07
let's say we find a child who has light sensitivity.
178
472000
2000
08:09
The child is provided treatment,
179
474000
2000
08:11
and I want to stress that the treatment
180
476000
2000
08:13
is completely unconditional;
181
478000
2000
08:15
there is no quid pro quo.
182
480000
2000
08:17
We treat many more children then we actually work with.
183
482000
3000
08:20
Every child who needs treatment is treated.
184
485000
3000
08:23
After treatment, about every week,
185
488000
2000
08:25
we run the child
186
490000
2000
08:27
on a battery of simple visual tests
187
492000
3000
08:30
in order to see how their visual skills
188
495000
2000
08:32
are coming on line.
189
497000
2000
08:34
And we try to do this for as long as possible.
190
499000
3000
08:37
This arc of development
191
502000
2000
08:39
gives us unprecedented
192
504000
2000
08:41
and extremely valuable information
193
506000
2000
08:43
about how the scaffolding of vision
194
508000
2000
08:45
gets set up.
195
510000
2000
08:47
What might be the causal connections
196
512000
2000
08:49
between the early developing skills
197
514000
2000
08:51
and the later developing ones?
198
516000
2000
08:53
And we've used this general approach to study
199
518000
2000
08:55
many different visual proficiencies,
200
520000
3000
08:58
but I want to highlight one particular one,
201
523000
4000
09:02
and that is image parsing into objects.
202
527000
3000
09:05
So, any image of the kind that you see on the left,
203
530000
2000
09:07
be it a real image or a synthetic image,
204
532000
3000
09:10
it's made up of little regions
205
535000
2000
09:12
that you see in the middle column,
206
537000
2000
09:14
regions of different colors, different luminances.
207
539000
3000
09:17
The brain has this complex task
208
542000
3000
09:20
of putting together, integrating,
209
545000
3000
09:23
subsets of these regions
210
548000
2000
09:25
into something that's more meaningful,
211
550000
2000
09:27
into what we would consider to be objects,
212
552000
2000
09:29
as you see on the right.
213
554000
2000
09:31
And nobody knows how this integration happens,
214
556000
2000
09:33
and that's the question we asked with Project Prakash.
215
558000
4000
09:37
So, here's what happens
216
562000
2000
09:39
very soon after the onset of sight.
217
564000
3000
09:42
Here's a person who had gained sight just a couple of weeks ago,
218
567000
3000
09:45
and you see Ethan Myers, a graduate student from MIT,
219
570000
3000
09:48
running the experiment with him.
220
573000
3000
09:51
His visual-motor coordination is quite poor,
221
576000
4000
09:55
but you get a general sense
222
580000
2000
09:57
of what are the regions that he's trying to trace out.
223
582000
3000
10:00
If you show him real world images,
224
585000
2000
10:02
if you show others like him real world images,
225
587000
3000
10:05
they are unable to recognize most of the objects
226
590000
2000
10:07
because the world to them is over-fragmented;
227
592000
3000
10:10
it's made up of a collage, a patchwork,
228
595000
3000
10:13
of regions of different colors and luminances.
229
598000
2000
10:15
And that's what's indicated in the green outlines.
230
600000
2000
10:17
When you ask them,
231
602000
2000
10:19
"Even if you can't name the objects, just point to where the objects are,"
232
604000
3000
10:22
these are the regions that they point to.
233
607000
2000
10:24
So the world is this complex
234
609000
2000
10:26
patchwork of regions.
235
611000
2000
10:28
Even the shadow on the ball
236
613000
2000
10:30
becomes its own object.
237
615000
3000
10:33
Interestingly enough,
238
618000
2000
10:35
you give them a few months,
239
620000
2000
10:37
and this is what happens.
240
622000
3000
10:43
Doctor: How many are these?
241
628000
2000
10:45
Patient: These are two things.
242
630000
2000
10:47
Doctor: What are their shapes?
243
632000
2000
10:49
Patient: Their shapes ...
244
634000
2000
10:51
This one is a circle,
245
636000
3000
10:54
and this
246
639000
2000
10:56
is a square.
247
641000
2000
10:58
PS: A very dramatic transformation has come about.
248
643000
3000
11:01
And the question is:
249
646000
2000
11:03
What underlies this transformation?
250
648000
2000
11:05
It's a profound question,
251
650000
2000
11:07
and what's even more amazing is how simple
252
652000
2000
11:09
the answer is.
253
654000
2000
11:11
The answer lies in motion
254
656000
2000
11:13
and that's what I want to show you in the next clip.
255
658000
3000
11:18
Doctor: What shape do you see here?
256
663000
2000
11:20
Patient: I can't make it out.
257
665000
3000
11:28
Doctor: Now?
258
673000
2000
11:31
Patient: Triangle.
259
676000
2000
11:35
Doctor: How many things are these?
260
680000
3000
11:48
Now, how many things are these?
261
693000
3000
11:51
Patient: Two.
262
696000
2000
11:53
Doctor: What are these things?
263
698000
2000
11:56
Patient: A square and a circle.
264
701000
2000
11:58
PS: And we see this pattern over and over again.
265
703000
3000
12:01
The one thing the visual system needs
266
706000
3000
12:04
in order to begin parsing the world
267
709000
2000
12:06
is dynamic information.
268
711000
2000
12:08
So the inference we are deriving from this,
269
713000
2000
12:10
and several such experiments,
270
715000
2000
12:12
is that dynamic information processing,
271
717000
2000
12:14
or motion processing,
272
719000
2000
12:16
serves as the bedrock for building
273
721000
2000
12:18
the rest of the complexity of visual processing;
274
723000
4000
12:22
it leads to visual integration
275
727000
2000
12:24
and eventually to recognition.
276
729000
3000
12:27
This simple idea has far reaching implications.
277
732000
3000
12:30
And let me just quickly mention two,
278
735000
3000
12:33
one, drawing from the domain of engineering,
279
738000
2000
12:35
and one from the clinic.
280
740000
2000
12:37
So, from the perspective of engineering,
281
742000
2000
12:39
we can ask: Goven that we know
282
744000
3000
12:42
that motion is so important for the human visual system,
283
747000
2000
12:44
can we use this as a recipe
284
749000
3000
12:47
for constructing machine-based vision systems
285
752000
3000
12:50
that can learn on their own, that don't need to be programmed
286
755000
3000
12:53
by a human programmer?
287
758000
2000
12:55
And that's what we're trying to do.
288
760000
2000
12:57
I'm at MIT, at MIT you need to apply
289
762000
3000
13:00
whatever basic knowledge you gain.
290
765000
2000
13:02
So we are creating Dylan,
291
767000
2000
13:04
which is a computational system
292
769000
2000
13:06
with an ambitious goal
293
771000
2000
13:08
of taking in visual inputs
294
773000
2000
13:10
of the same kind that a human child would receive,
295
775000
3000
13:13
and autonomously discovering:
296
778000
2000
13:15
What are the objects in this visual input?
297
780000
3000
13:18
So, don't worry about the internals of Dylan.
298
783000
3000
13:21
Here, I'm just going to talk about
299
786000
3000
13:24
how we test Dylan.
300
789000
2000
13:26
The way we test Dylan is by giving it
301
791000
2000
13:28
inputs, as I said, of the same kind
302
793000
3000
13:31
that a baby, or a child in Project Prakash would get.
303
796000
3000
13:34
But for a long time we couldn't quite figure out:
304
799000
3000
13:37
Wow can we get these kinds of video inputs?
305
802000
3000
13:41
So, I thought,
306
806000
2000
13:43
could we have Darius
307
808000
2000
13:45
serve as our babycam carrier,
308
810000
3000
13:48
and that way get the inputs that we feed into Dylan?
309
813000
3000
13:51
So that's what we did.
310
816000
2000
13:53
(Laughter)
311
818000
7000
14:00
I had to have long conversations with my wife.
312
825000
3000
14:03
(Laughter)
313
828000
5000
14:08
In fact, Pam, if you're watching this,
314
833000
2000
14:10
please forgive me.
315
835000
2000
14:13
So, we modified the optics of the camera
316
838000
4000
14:17
in order to mimic the baby's visual acuity.
317
842000
3000
14:20
As some of you might know,
318
845000
2000
14:22
babyies are born pretty much legally blind.
319
847000
4000
14:26
Their acuity -- our acuity is 20/20;
320
851000
3000
14:29
babies' acuity is like 20/800,
321
854000
3000
14:32
so they are looking at the world
322
857000
2000
14:34
in a very, very blurry fashion.
323
859000
3000
14:37
Here's what a baby-cam video looks like.
324
862000
3000
14:41
(Laughter)
325
866000
9000
14:50
(Applause)
326
875000
3000
14:53
Thankfully, there isn't any audio
327
878000
2000
14:55
to go with this.
328
880000
3000
14:58
What's amazing is that working with such
329
883000
2000
15:00
highly degraded input,
330
885000
2000
15:02
the baby, very quickly, is able
331
887000
2000
15:04
to discover meaning in such input.
332
889000
3000
15:07
But then two or three days afterward,
333
892000
2000
15:09
babies begin to pay attention
334
894000
2000
15:11
to their mother's or their father's face.
335
896000
2000
15:13
How does that happen? We want Dylan to be able to do that,
336
898000
3000
15:16
and using this mantra of motion,
337
901000
3000
15:19
Dylan actually can do that.
338
904000
2000
15:21
So, given that kind of video input,
339
906000
3000
15:24
with just about six or seven minutes worth of video,
340
909000
3000
15:27
Dylan can begin to extract patterns
341
912000
3000
15:30
that include faces.
342
915000
3000
15:33
So, it's an important demonstration
343
918000
2000
15:35
of the power of motion.
344
920000
2000
15:37
The clinical implication, it comes from the domain of autism.
345
922000
3000
15:40
Visual integration has been associated with autism
346
925000
2000
15:42
by several researchers.
347
927000
2000
15:44
When we saw that, we asked:
348
929000
2000
15:46
Could the impairment in visual integration
349
931000
3000
15:49
be the manifestation of something underneath,
350
934000
3000
15:52
of dynamic information processing deficiencies in autism?
351
937000
3000
15:55
Because, if that hypothesis were to be true,
352
940000
3000
15:58
it would have massive repercussions in our understanding
353
943000
3000
16:01
of what's causing the many different aspects
354
946000
2000
16:03
of the autism phenotype.
355
948000
3000
16:06
What you're going to see are
356
951000
2000
16:08
video clips of two children -- one neurotypical,
357
953000
3000
16:11
one with autism, playing Pong.
358
956000
2000
16:13
So, while the child is playing Pong, we are tracking where they're looking.
359
958000
3000
16:16
In red are the eye movement traces.
360
961000
3000
16:19
This is the neurotypical child, and what you see
361
964000
3000
16:22
is that the child is able to make cues
362
967000
2000
16:24
of the dynamic information
363
969000
2000
16:26
to predict where the ball is going to go.
364
971000
2000
16:28
Even before the ball gets to a place,
365
973000
3000
16:31
the child is already looking there.
366
976000
3000
16:34
Contrast this with a child
367
979000
2000
16:36
with autism playing the same game.
368
981000
2000
16:38
Instead of anticipating,
369
983000
2000
16:40
the child always follows where the ball has been.
370
985000
3000
16:43
The efficiency of the use
371
988000
2000
16:45
of dynamic information
372
990000
2000
16:47
seems to be significantly compromised in autism.
373
992000
3000
16:51
So we are pursuing this line of work
374
996000
3000
16:54
and hopefully we'll have
375
999000
2000
16:56
more results to report soon.
376
1001000
2000
16:58
Looking ahead, if you think of this disk
377
1003000
3000
17:01
as representing all of the children
378
1006000
2000
17:03
we've treated so far,
379
1008000
2000
17:05
this is the magnitude of the problem.
380
1010000
2000
17:07
The red dots are the children we have not treated.
381
1012000
3000
17:10
So, there are many, many more children who need to be treated,
382
1015000
2000
17:12
and in order to expand the scope of the project,
383
1017000
3000
17:15
we are planning on launching
384
1020000
2000
17:17
The Prakash Center for Children,
385
1022000
2000
17:19
which will have a dedicated pediatric hospital,
386
1024000
3000
17:22
a school for the children we are treating
387
1027000
2000
17:24
and also a cutting-edge research facility.
388
1029000
2000
17:26
The Prakash Center will integrate health care,
389
1031000
3000
17:29
education and research in a way
390
1034000
2000
17:31
that truly creates the whole
391
1036000
2000
17:33
to be greater than the sum of the parts.
392
1038000
3000
17:36
So, to summarize: Prakash, in its five years of existence,
393
1041000
3000
17:39
it's had an impact in multiple areas,
394
1044000
3000
17:42
ranging from basic neuroscience
395
1047000
2000
17:44
plasticity and learning in the brain,
396
1049000
2000
17:46
to clinically relevant hypotheses like in autism,
397
1051000
4000
17:50
the development of autonomous machine vision systems,
398
1055000
3000
17:53
education of the undergraduate and graduate students,
399
1058000
3000
17:56
and most importantly in the alleviation
400
1061000
2000
17:58
of childhood blindness.
401
1063000
2000
18:00
And for my students and I, it's been
402
1065000
2000
18:02
just a phenomenal experience
403
1067000
2000
18:04
because we have gotten to do interesting research,
404
1069000
4000
18:08
while at the same time
405
1073000
2000
18:10
helping the many children that we have worked with.
406
1075000
2000
18:12
Thank you very much.
407
1077000
2000
18:14
(Applause)
408
1079000
2000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Pawan Sinha - Visual neuroscientistPawan Sinha researches how our brains interpret what our eyes see -- and uses that research to give blind children the gift of sight.
Why you should listen
At Pawan Sinha's MIT lab, he and his team spend their days trying to understand how the brain learns to recognize and use the patterns and scenes we see around us. To do this, they often use computers to model the processes of the human brain, but they also study human subjects, some of whom are seeing the world for the very first time and can tell them about the experience as it happens. They find these unusual subjects through the humanitarian branch of their research, Project Prakash.
Project Prakash sets up eye-care camps in some of the most habitually underserved regions of India, and gives free eye-health screenings to, since 2003, more than 700 functionally blind children. The children are then treated without charge, even if they do not fit the profile that would make them eligible for Sinha's research.
Sinha's eventual goal is to help 500 children each year; plans are under way for a center for visual rehabilitation in new Delhi. The special relationship that Sinha has created between research and humanitarianism promises to deliver on both fronts.
Pawan Sinha | Speaker | TED.com