TEDWomen 2010
Naomi Klein: Addicted to risk
Filmed:
Readability: 4.7
1,031,224 views
Days before this talk, journalist Naomi Klein was on a boat in the Gulf of Mexico, looking at the catastrophic results of BP's risky pursuit of oil. Our societies have become addicted to extreme risk in finding new energy, new financial instruments and more ... and too often, we're left to clean up a mess afterward. Klein's question: What's the backup plan?
Naomi Klein - Journalist, activist
Naomi Klein is a public intellectual, journalist and activist. Full bio
Naomi Klein is a public intellectual, journalist and activist. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:15
I just did something I've never done before.
0
0
3000
00:18
I spent a week at sea on a research vessel.
1
3000
3000
00:21
Now I'm not a scientist,
2
6000
2000
00:23
but I was accompanying a remarkable scientific team
3
8000
3000
00:26
from the University of South Florida
4
11000
2000
00:28
who have been tracking the travels of BP's oil
5
13000
3000
00:31
in the Gulf of Mexico.
6
16000
2000
00:33
This is the boat we were on, by the way.
7
18000
3000
00:36
The scientists I was with
8
21000
2000
00:38
were not studying the effect of the oil and dispersants on the big stuff --
9
23000
3000
00:41
the birds, the turtles,
10
26000
2000
00:43
the dolphins, the glamorous stuff.
11
28000
2000
00:45
They're looking at the really little stuff
12
30000
3000
00:48
that gets eaten by the slightly less little stuff
13
33000
3000
00:51
that eventually gets eaten by the big stuff.
14
36000
3000
00:54
And what they're finding
15
39000
2000
00:56
is that even trace amounts of oil and dispersants
16
41000
3000
00:59
can be highly toxic to phytoplankton,
17
44000
2000
01:01
which is very bad news,
18
46000
2000
01:03
because so much life depends on it.
19
48000
3000
01:06
So contrary to what we heard a few months back
20
51000
2000
01:08
about how 75 percent of that oil
21
53000
2000
01:10
sort of magically disappeared
22
55000
2000
01:12
and we didn't have to worry about it,
23
57000
2000
01:14
this disaster is still unfolding.
24
59000
3000
01:17
It's still working its way up the food chain.
25
62000
3000
01:20
Now this shouldn't come as a surprise to us.
26
65000
3000
01:23
Rachel Carson --
27
68000
2000
01:25
the godmother of modern environmentalism --
28
70000
2000
01:27
warned us about this very thing
29
72000
2000
01:29
back in 1962.
30
74000
2000
01:31
She pointed out that the "control men" --
31
76000
2000
01:33
as she called them --
32
78000
2000
01:35
who carpet-bombed towns and fields
33
80000
2000
01:37
with toxic insecticides like DDT,
34
82000
3000
01:40
were only trying to kill the little stuff, the insects,
35
85000
3000
01:43
not the birds.
36
88000
2000
01:45
But they forgot this:
37
90000
2000
01:47
the fact that birds dine on grubs,
38
92000
2000
01:49
that robins eat lots of worms
39
94000
2000
01:51
now saturated with DDT.
40
96000
3000
01:54
And so, robin eggs failed to hatch,
41
99000
3000
01:57
songbirds died en masse,
42
102000
2000
01:59
towns fell silent.
43
104000
2000
02:01
Thus the title "Silent Spring."
44
106000
3000
02:05
I've been trying to pinpoint
45
110000
2000
02:07
what keeps drawing me back to the Gulf of Mexico,
46
112000
2000
02:09
because I'm Canadian,
47
114000
2000
02:11
and I can draw no ancestral ties.
48
116000
2000
02:13
And I think what it is
49
118000
2000
02:15
is I don't think we have fully come to terms
50
120000
3000
02:18
with the meaning of this disaster,
51
123000
3000
02:21
with what it meant to witness a hole
52
126000
3000
02:24
ripped in our world,
53
129000
2000
02:26
with what it meant to watch the contents of the Earth
54
131000
3000
02:29
gush forth on live TV,
55
134000
2000
02:31
24 hours a day,
56
136000
2000
02:33
for months.
57
138000
2000
02:35
After telling ourselves for so long
58
140000
3000
02:38
that our tools and technology can control nature,
59
143000
3000
02:41
suddenly we were face-to-face
60
146000
2000
02:43
with our weakness,
61
148000
2000
02:45
with our lack of control,
62
150000
2000
02:47
as the oil burst out
63
152000
2000
02:49
of every attempt to contain it --
64
154000
3000
02:52
"top hats," "top kills"
65
157000
2000
02:54
and, most memorably, the "junk shot" --
66
159000
2000
02:56
the bright idea
67
161000
2000
02:58
of firing old tires and golf balls
68
163000
3000
03:01
down that hole in the world.
69
166000
2000
03:03
But even more striking
70
168000
2000
03:05
than the ferocious power emanating from that well
71
170000
3000
03:08
was the recklessness
72
173000
2000
03:10
with which that power was unleashed --
73
175000
2000
03:12
the carelessness, the lack of planning
74
177000
3000
03:15
that characterized the operation
75
180000
2000
03:17
from drilling to clean-up.
76
182000
3000
03:20
If there is one thing
77
185000
2000
03:22
BP's watery improv act made clear,
78
187000
3000
03:25
it is that, as a culture,
79
190000
2000
03:27
we have become far too willing to gamble
80
192000
2000
03:29
with things that are precious
81
194000
2000
03:31
and irreplaceable,
82
196000
2000
03:33
and to do so without a back-up plan,
83
198000
3000
03:36
without an exit strategy.
84
201000
2000
03:38
And BP was hardly
85
203000
2000
03:40
our first experience of this in recent years.
86
205000
2000
03:42
Our leaders barrel into wars,
87
207000
2000
03:44
telling themselves happy stories
88
209000
2000
03:46
about cakewalks and welcome parades.
89
211000
3000
03:49
Then, it is years of deadly damage control,
90
214000
3000
03:52
Frankensteins of sieges and surges
91
217000
3000
03:55
and counter-insurgencies,
92
220000
2000
03:57
and once again, no exit strategy.
93
222000
3000
04:00
Our financial wizards routinely fall victim
94
225000
3000
04:03
to similar overconfidence,
95
228000
2000
04:05
convincing themselves that the latest bubble
96
230000
2000
04:07
is a new kind of market --
97
232000
2000
04:09
the kind that never goes down.
98
234000
2000
04:11
And when it inevitably does,
99
236000
2000
04:13
the best and the brightest
100
238000
2000
04:15
reach for the financial equivalent of the junk shot --
101
240000
2000
04:17
in this case, throwing massive amounts
102
242000
2000
04:19
of much-needed public money
103
244000
2000
04:21
down a very different kind of hole.
104
246000
3000
04:24
As with BP, the hole does get plugged,
105
249000
2000
04:26
at least temporarily,
106
251000
2000
04:28
but not before
107
253000
2000
04:30
exacting a tremendous price.
108
255000
2000
04:32
We have to figure out
109
257000
2000
04:34
why we keep letting this happen,
110
259000
2000
04:36
because we are in the midst
111
261000
2000
04:38
of what may be our highest-stakes gamble of all --
112
263000
3000
04:41
deciding what to do, or not to do,
113
266000
2000
04:43
about climate change.
114
268000
2000
04:45
Now as you know,
115
270000
2000
04:47
a great deal of time is spent,
116
272000
2000
04:49
in this country and around the world,
117
274000
2000
04:51
inside the climate debate,
118
276000
2000
04:53
on the question of, "What if the IPC scientists
119
278000
3000
04:56
are all wrong?"
120
281000
2000
04:58
Now a far more relevant question --
121
283000
2000
05:00
as MIT physicist Evelyn Fox Keller puts it --
122
285000
3000
05:03
is, "What if those scientists are right?"
123
288000
4000
05:08
Given the stakes, the climate crisis
124
293000
2000
05:10
clearly calls for us to act
125
295000
2000
05:12
based on the precautionary principle --
126
297000
3000
05:15
the theory that holds
127
300000
2000
05:17
that when human health and the environment
128
302000
2000
05:19
are significantly at risk
129
304000
2000
05:21
and when the potential damage is irreversible,
130
306000
3000
05:24
we cannot afford to wait
131
309000
2000
05:26
for perfect scientific certainty.
132
311000
2000
05:28
Better to err on the side of caution.
133
313000
3000
05:31
More overt, the burden of proving
134
316000
2000
05:33
that a practice is safe
135
318000
2000
05:35
should not be placed on the public that would be harmed,
136
320000
3000
05:38
but rather on the industry that stands to profit.
137
323000
3000
05:42
But climate policy in the wealthy world --
138
327000
2000
05:44
to the extent that such a thing exists --
139
329000
3000
05:47
is not based on precaution,
140
332000
2000
05:49
but rather on cost-benefit analysis --
141
334000
3000
05:52
finding the course of action that economists believe
142
337000
2000
05:54
will have the least impact
143
339000
2000
05:56
on our GDP.
144
341000
2000
05:58
So rather than asking, as precaution would demand,
145
343000
3000
06:01
what can we do as quickly as possible
146
346000
2000
06:03
to avoid potential catastrophe,
147
348000
3000
06:06
we ask bizarre questions like this:
148
351000
3000
06:09
"What is the latest possible moment we can wait
149
354000
3000
06:12
before we begin seriously lowering emissions?
150
357000
3000
06:15
Can we put this off till 2020,
151
360000
2000
06:17
2030, 2050?"
152
362000
3000
06:20
Or we ask,
153
365000
2000
06:22
"How much hotter can we let the planet get
154
367000
2000
06:24
and still survive?
155
369000
2000
06:26
Can we go with two degrees, three degrees, or --
156
371000
2000
06:28
where we're currently going --
157
373000
2000
06:30
four degrees Celsius?"
158
375000
2000
06:32
And by the way,
159
377000
2000
06:34
the assumption that we can safely control
160
379000
2000
06:36
the Earth's awesomely complex climate system
161
381000
3000
06:39
as if it had a thermostat,
162
384000
2000
06:41
making the planet not too hot, not too cold,
163
386000
3000
06:44
but just right -- sort of Goldilocks style --
164
389000
3000
06:47
this is pure fantasy,
165
392000
2000
06:49
and it's not coming from the climate scientists.
166
394000
3000
06:52
It's coming from the economists
167
397000
2000
06:54
imposing their mechanistic thinking
168
399000
2000
06:56
on the science.
169
401000
2000
06:58
The fact is that we simply don't know
170
403000
2000
07:00
when the warming that we create
171
405000
2000
07:02
will be utterly overwhelmed
172
407000
2000
07:04
by feedback loops.
173
409000
2000
07:06
So once again,
174
411000
2000
07:08
why do we take these crazy risks
175
413000
2000
07:10
with the precious?
176
415000
2000
07:12
A range of explanations
177
417000
2000
07:14
may be popping into your mind by now,
178
419000
2000
07:16
like "greed."
179
421000
2000
07:18
This is a popular explanation, and there's lots of truth to it,
180
423000
3000
07:21
because taking big risks, as we all know,
181
426000
3000
07:24
pays a lot of money.
182
429000
2000
07:26
Another explanation that you often hear for recklessness
183
431000
2000
07:28
is hubris.
184
433000
2000
07:30
And greed and hubris
185
435000
2000
07:32
are intimately intertwined
186
437000
2000
07:34
when it comes to recklessness.
187
439000
2000
07:36
For instance, if you happen to be a 35-year-old banker
188
441000
3000
07:39
taking home 100 times more
189
444000
2000
07:41
than a brain surgeon,
190
446000
2000
07:43
then you need a narrative,
191
448000
2000
07:45
you need a story
192
450000
2000
07:47
that makes that disparity okay.
193
452000
2000
07:49
And you actually don't have a lot of options.
194
454000
3000
07:52
You're either an incredibly good scammer,
195
457000
3000
07:55
and you're getting away with it -- you gamed the system --
196
460000
2000
07:57
or you're some kind of boy genius,
197
462000
2000
07:59
the likes of which the world has never seen.
198
464000
3000
08:02
Now both of these options -- the boy genius and the scammer --
199
467000
3000
08:05
are going to make you vastly overconfident
200
470000
2000
08:07
and therefore more prone
201
472000
2000
08:09
to taking even bigger risks in the future.
202
474000
3000
08:13
By the way, Tony Hayward, the former CEO of BP,
203
478000
3000
08:16
had a plaque on his desk
204
481000
2000
08:18
inscribed with this inspirational slogan:
205
483000
2000
08:20
"What would you attempt to do
206
485000
2000
08:22
if you knew you could not fail?"
207
487000
3000
08:25
Now this is actually a popular plaque,
208
490000
3000
08:28
and this is a crowd of overachievers,
209
493000
2000
08:30
so I'm betting that some of you have this plaque.
210
495000
3000
08:33
Don't feel ashamed.
211
498000
2000
08:35
Putting fear of failure out of your mind
212
500000
2000
08:37
can be a very good thing
213
502000
2000
08:39
if you're training for a triathlon
214
504000
2000
08:41
or preparing to give a TEDTalk,
215
506000
3000
08:44
but personally, I think people with the power
216
509000
2000
08:46
to detonate our economy and ravage our ecology
217
511000
3000
08:49
would do better having
218
514000
2000
08:51
a picture of Icarus hanging from the wall,
219
516000
2000
08:53
because -- maybe not that one in particular --
220
518000
3000
08:56
but I want them thinking about the possibility of failure
221
521000
3000
08:59
all of the time.
222
524000
2000
09:01
So we have greed,
223
526000
2000
09:03
we've got overconfidence/hubris,
224
528000
2000
09:05
but since we're here at TEDWomen,
225
530000
2000
09:07
let's consider one other factor
226
532000
2000
09:09
that could be contributing in some small way
227
534000
2000
09:11
to societal recklessness.
228
536000
2000
09:15
Now I'm not going to belabor this point,
229
540000
2000
09:17
but studies do show that, as investors,
230
542000
2000
09:19
women are much less prone
231
544000
2000
09:21
to taking reckless risks than men,
232
546000
3000
09:24
precisely because, as we've already heard,
233
549000
2000
09:26
women tend not to suffer from overconfidence
234
551000
3000
09:29
in the same way that men do.
235
554000
2000
09:31
So it turns out
236
556000
2000
09:33
that being paid less and praised less
237
558000
2000
09:35
has its upsides --
238
560000
2000
09:37
for society at least.
239
562000
2000
09:39
The flipside of this
240
564000
2000
09:41
is that constantly being told
241
566000
2000
09:43
that you are gifted, chosen
242
568000
2000
09:45
and born to rule
243
570000
2000
09:47
has distinct societal downsides.
244
572000
3000
09:50
And this problem -- call it the "perils of privilege" --
245
575000
3000
09:53
brings us closer, I think,
246
578000
2000
09:55
to the root of our collective recklessness.
247
580000
3000
09:58
Because none of us -- at least in the global North --
248
583000
2000
10:00
neither men nor women,
249
585000
2000
10:02
are fully exempt from this message.
250
587000
3000
10:05
Here's what I'm talking about.
251
590000
2000
10:07
Whether we actively believe them
252
592000
2000
10:09
or consciously reject them,
253
594000
2000
10:11
our culture remains in the grips
254
596000
2000
10:13
of certain archetypal stories
255
598000
2000
10:15
about our supremacy
256
600000
2000
10:17
over others and over nature --
257
602000
2000
10:19
the narrative of the newly discovered frontier
258
604000
3000
10:22
and the conquering pioneer,
259
607000
2000
10:24
the narrative of manifest destiny,
260
609000
2000
10:26
the narrative of apocalypse and salvation.
261
611000
2000
10:28
And just when you think these stories are fading into history,
262
613000
2000
10:30
and that we've gotten over them,
263
615000
2000
10:32
they pop up in the strangest places.
264
617000
3000
10:35
For instance, I stumbled across this advertisement
265
620000
2000
10:37
outside the women's washroom
266
622000
2000
10:39
in the Kansas City airport.
267
624000
2000
10:41
It's for Motorola's new Rugged cell phone,
268
626000
2000
10:43
and yes, it really does say,
269
628000
2000
10:45
"Slap Mother Nature in the face."
270
630000
2000
10:47
And I'm not just showing it to pick on Motorola --
271
632000
2000
10:49
that's just a bonus.
272
634000
2000
10:51
I'm showing it because --
273
636000
2000
10:53
they're not a sponsor, are they? --
274
638000
2000
10:55
because, in its own way,
275
640000
2000
10:57
this is a crass version
276
642000
2000
10:59
of our founding story.
277
644000
2000
11:01
We slapped Mother Nature around and won,
278
646000
2000
11:03
and we always win,
279
648000
2000
11:05
because dominating nature is our destiny.
280
650000
3000
11:08
But this is not the only fairytale we tell ourselves about nature.
281
653000
3000
11:11
There's another one, equally important,
282
656000
3000
11:14
about how that very same Mother Nature
283
659000
2000
11:16
is so nurturing and so resilient
284
661000
3000
11:19
that we can never make a dent in her abundance.
285
664000
3000
11:22
Let's hear from Tony Hayward again.
286
667000
2000
11:24
"The Gulf of Mexico is a very big ocean.
287
669000
3000
11:27
The amount of oil and dispersants that we are putting into it
288
672000
3000
11:30
is tiny in relation to the total water volume."
289
675000
3000
11:33
In other words, the ocean is big;
290
678000
2000
11:35
she can take it.
291
680000
3000
11:38
It is this underlying assumption of limitlessness
292
683000
3000
11:41
that makes it possible
293
686000
2000
11:43
to take the reckless risks that we do.
294
688000
3000
11:46
Because this is our real master-narrative:
295
691000
3000
11:49
however much we mess up,
296
694000
2000
11:51
there will always be more --
297
696000
2000
11:53
more water, more land,
298
698000
3000
11:56
more untapped resources.
299
701000
2000
11:58
A new bubble will replace the old one.
300
703000
2000
12:00
A new technology will come along
301
705000
2000
12:02
to fix the messes we made with the last one.
302
707000
3000
12:05
In a way, that is the story
303
710000
2000
12:07
of the settling of the Americas,
304
712000
2000
12:09
the supposedly inexhaustible frontier
305
714000
2000
12:11
to which Europeans escaped.
306
716000
3000
12:14
And it's also the story of modern capitalism,
307
719000
3000
12:17
because it was the wealth from this land
308
722000
2000
12:19
that gave birth to our economic system,
309
724000
3000
12:22
one that cannot survive without perpetual growth
310
727000
3000
12:25
and an unending supply
311
730000
2000
12:27
of new frontiers.
312
732000
2000
12:29
Now the problem is
313
734000
2000
12:31
that the story was always a lie.
314
736000
2000
12:33
The Earth always did have limits.
315
738000
2000
12:35
They were just beyond our sights.
316
740000
2000
12:37
And now we are hitting those limits
317
742000
2000
12:39
on multiple fronts.
318
744000
3000
12:42
I believe that we know this,
319
747000
2000
12:44
yet we find ourselves trapped in a kind of narrative loop.
320
749000
3000
12:47
Not only do we continue to tell and retell
321
752000
3000
12:50
the same tired stories,
322
755000
2000
12:52
but we are now doing so
323
757000
2000
12:54
with a frenzy and a fury
324
759000
2000
12:56
that, frankly, verges on camp.
325
761000
3000
12:59
How else to explain the cultural space
326
764000
3000
13:02
occupied by Sarah Palin?
327
767000
2000
13:04
Now on the one hand,
328
769000
2000
13:06
exhorting us to "drill, baby, drill,"
329
771000
2000
13:08
because God put those resources into the ground
330
773000
3000
13:11
in order for us to exploit them,
331
776000
3000
13:14
and on the other, glorying in the wilderness
332
779000
3000
13:17
of Alaska's untouched beauty
333
782000
2000
13:19
on her hit reality TV show.
334
784000
3000
13:22
The twin message is as comforting as it is mad.
335
787000
3000
13:25
Ignore those creeping fears
336
790000
2000
13:27
that we have finally hit the wall.
337
792000
2000
13:29
There are still no limits.
338
794000
2000
13:31
There will always be another frontier.
339
796000
3000
13:34
So stop worrying and keep shopping.
340
799000
3000
13:37
Now, would that this were just about
341
802000
2000
13:39
Sarah Palin and her reality TV show.
342
804000
2000
13:41
In environmental circles,
343
806000
2000
13:43
we often hear that, rather than shifting to renewables,
344
808000
3000
13:46
we are continuing with business as usual.
345
811000
3000
13:49
This assessment, unfortunately,
346
814000
2000
13:51
is far too optimistic.
347
816000
2000
13:53
The truth is that we have already exhausted
348
818000
3000
13:56
so much of the easily accessible fossil fuels
349
821000
3000
13:59
that we have already entered
350
824000
2000
14:01
a far riskier business era,
351
826000
3000
14:04
the era of extreme energy.
352
829000
2000
14:06
So that means drilling for oil in the deepest water,
353
831000
3000
14:09
including the icy Arctic seas,
354
834000
2000
14:11
where a clean-up may simply be impossible.
355
836000
3000
14:14
It means large-scale hydraulic fracking for gas
356
839000
3000
14:17
and massive strip-mining operations for coal,
357
842000
2000
14:19
the likes of which we haven't yet seen.
358
844000
3000
14:22
And most controversially, it means the tar sands.
359
847000
3000
14:25
I'm always surprised by how little
360
850000
2000
14:27
people outside of Canada
361
852000
2000
14:29
know about the Alberta Tar Sands,
362
854000
2000
14:31
which this year are projected to become
363
856000
2000
14:33
the number one source of imported oil
364
858000
3000
14:36
to the United States.
365
861000
2000
14:38
It's worth taking a moment to understand this practice,
366
863000
3000
14:41
because I believe it speaks to recklessness
367
866000
2000
14:43
and the path we're on
368
868000
2000
14:45
like little else.
369
870000
2000
14:47
So this is where the tar sands live,
370
872000
3000
14:50
under one of the last magnificent
371
875000
2000
14:52
Boreal forests.
372
877000
2000
14:54
The oil is not liquid.
373
879000
2000
14:56
You can't just drill a hole and pump it out.
374
881000
2000
14:58
Tar sand's oil is solid,
375
883000
2000
15:00
mixed in with the soil.
376
885000
2000
15:02
So to get at it,
377
887000
2000
15:04
you first have to get rid of the trees.
378
889000
3000
15:07
Then, you rip off the topsoil
379
892000
2000
15:09
and get at that oily sand.
380
894000
3000
15:12
The process requires a huge amount of water,
381
897000
3000
15:15
which is then pumped into massive toxic tailing ponds.
382
900000
4000
15:19
That's very bad news for local indigenous people
383
904000
3000
15:22
living downstream
384
907000
2000
15:24
who are reporting alarmingly high cancer rates.
385
909000
3000
15:27
Now looking at these images,
386
912000
2000
15:29
it's difficult to grasp the scale of this operation,
387
914000
3000
15:32
which can already be seen from space
388
917000
3000
15:35
and could grow to an area the size of England.
389
920000
3000
15:38
I find it helps actually
390
923000
2000
15:40
to look at the dump trucks that move the earth,
391
925000
2000
15:42
the largest ever built.
392
927000
2000
15:44
That's a person down there by the wheel.
393
929000
2000
15:46
My point is that
394
931000
2000
15:48
this is not oil drilling.
395
933000
2000
15:50
It's not even mining.
396
935000
2000
15:52
It is terrestrial skinning.
397
937000
2000
15:54
Vast, vivid landscapes
398
939000
2000
15:56
are being gutted,
399
941000
2000
15:58
left monochromatic gray.
400
943000
2000
16:00
Now I should confess that as [far as] I'm concerned
401
945000
3000
16:03
this would be an abomination
402
948000
2000
16:05
if it emitted not one particle of carbon.
403
950000
2000
16:07
But the truth is that, on average,
404
952000
3000
16:10
turning that gunk into crude oil
405
955000
3000
16:13
produces about three times more greenhouse gas pollution
406
958000
3000
16:16
than it does to produce conventional oil
407
961000
2000
16:18
in Canada.
408
963000
2000
16:20
How else to describe this,
409
965000
2000
16:22
but as a form of mass insanity?
410
967000
3000
16:25
Just when we know we need to be learning
411
970000
3000
16:28
to live on the surface of our planet,
412
973000
2000
16:30
off the power of sun, wind and waves,
413
975000
3000
16:33
we are frantically digging
414
978000
2000
16:35
to get at the dirtiest,
415
980000
2000
16:37
highest-emitting stuff imaginable.
416
982000
3000
16:40
This is where our story of endless growth
417
985000
2000
16:42
has taken us,
418
987000
2000
16:44
to this black hole at the center of my country --
419
989000
3000
16:47
a place of such planetary pain
420
992000
2000
16:49
that, like the BP gusher,
421
994000
2000
16:51
one can only stand to look at it for so long.
422
996000
4000
16:55
As Jared Diamond and others have shown us,
423
1000000
3000
16:58
this is how civilizations commit suicide,
424
1003000
3000
17:01
by slamming their foot on the accelerator
425
1006000
3000
17:04
at the exact moment
426
1009000
2000
17:06
when they should be putting on the brakes.
427
1011000
2000
17:08
The problem is that our master-narrative
428
1013000
3000
17:11
has an answer for that too.
429
1016000
2000
17:13
At the very last minute, we are going to get saved
430
1018000
3000
17:16
just like in every Hollywood movie,
431
1021000
2000
17:18
just like in the Rapture.
432
1023000
3000
17:21
But, of course, our secular religion is technology.
433
1026000
3000
17:24
Now, you may have noticed
434
1029000
2000
17:27
more and more headlines like these.
435
1032000
2000
17:29
The idea behind this form of "geoengineering" as it's called,
436
1034000
3000
17:32
is that, as the planet heats up,
437
1037000
2000
17:34
we may be able to shoot sulfates and aluminum particles
438
1039000
3000
17:37
into the stratosphere
439
1042000
2000
17:39
to reflect some of the sun's rays
440
1044000
2000
17:41
back to space,
441
1046000
2000
17:43
thereby cooling the planet.
442
1048000
3000
17:46
The wackiest plan -- and I'm not making this up --
443
1051000
2000
17:48
would put what is essentially a garden hose
444
1053000
3000
17:51
18-and-a-half miles high into the sky,
445
1056000
3000
17:54
suspended by balloons,
446
1059000
2000
17:56
to spew sulfur dioxide.
447
1061000
2000
17:58
So, solving the problem of pollution with more pollution.
448
1063000
3000
18:01
Think of it as the ultimate junk shot.
449
1066000
3000
18:05
The serious scientists involved in this research
450
1070000
2000
18:07
all stress that these techniques
451
1072000
2000
18:09
are entirely untested.
452
1074000
2000
18:11
They don't know if they'll work,
453
1076000
2000
18:13
and they have no idea
454
1078000
2000
18:15
what kind of terrifying side effects they could unleash.
455
1080000
3000
18:18
Nevertheless, the mere mention of geoengineering
456
1083000
3000
18:21
is being greeted in some circles,
457
1086000
2000
18:23
particularly media circles,
458
1088000
2000
18:25
with a relief tinged with euphoria.
459
1090000
2000
18:27
An escape hatch has been reached.
460
1092000
2000
18:29
A new frontier has been found.
461
1094000
2000
18:31
Most importantly,
462
1096000
2000
18:33
we don't have to change our lifestyles after all.
463
1098000
2000
18:35
You see, for some people,
464
1100000
2000
18:37
their savior is a guy in a flowing robe.
465
1102000
2000
18:39
For other people, it's a guy with a garden hose.
466
1104000
3000
18:43
We badly need some new stories.
467
1108000
3000
18:46
We need stories that have different kinds of heroes
468
1111000
3000
18:49
willing to take different kinds of risks --
469
1114000
3000
18:52
risks that confront recklessness head on,
470
1117000
2000
18:54
that put the precautionary principle into practice,
471
1119000
3000
18:57
even if that means through direct action --
472
1122000
3000
19:00
like hundreds of young people willing to get arrested,
473
1125000
2000
19:02
blocking dirty power plants
474
1127000
2000
19:04
or fighting mountaintop-removal coal mining.
475
1129000
3000
19:07
We need stories
476
1132000
2000
19:09
that replace that linear narrative of endless growth
477
1134000
3000
19:12
with circular narratives
478
1137000
2000
19:14
that remind us
479
1139000
2000
19:16
that what goes around comes around.
480
1141000
2000
19:18
That this is our only home.
481
1143000
2000
19:20
There is no escape hatch.
482
1145000
2000
19:22
Call it karma, call it physics,
483
1147000
3000
19:25
action and reaction, call it precaution --
484
1150000
3000
19:28
the principle that reminds us
485
1153000
2000
19:30
that life is too precious to be risked
486
1155000
2000
19:32
for any profit.
487
1157000
2000
19:34
Thank you.
488
1159000
2000
19:36
(Applause)
489
1161000
7000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Naomi Klein - Journalist, activistNaomi Klein is a public intellectual, journalist and activist.
Why you should listen
In her first book, No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies, Naomi Klein made a strong case against the takeover of public life by global corporations and brands. She ended that pre-internet essay suggesting as a counterpoint that everyone could become their own "personal brand." In her most recent book, No Is Not Enough: Resisting Trump's Shock Politics and Winning the World We Need, she analyzes how social media has made the idea of personal branding commonplace -- and how it helped Donald Trump become the first brand-president.
Klein's other books The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism and This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate have also energized the global conversation. Klein is a board member of climate-action group 350.org and one of the organizers of Canada’s Leap Manifesto, and in 2015 she helped launch Pope Francis’s historic encyclical on ecology. In 2016, she received the Sydney Peace Prize for "inspiring us to stand up locally, nationally and internationally to demand a new agenda for sharing the planet that respects human rights and equality."
Naomi Klein | Speaker | TED.com