TEDxBrussels
Paddy Ashdown: The global power shift
Filmed:
Readability: 4.3
1,134,248 views
Paddy Ashdown believes we are living in a moment in history where power is changing in ways it never has before. In a spellbinding talk he outlines the three major global shifts that he sees coming.
Paddy Ashdown - Diplomat
Paddy Ashdown is a former member of the British Parliament and a diplomat with a lifelong commitment to international cooperation. Full bio
Paddy Ashdown is a former member of the British Parliament and a diplomat with a lifelong commitment to international cooperation. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:15
There's a poem written
0
0
2000
00:17
by a very famous English poet
1
2000
2000
00:19
at the end of the 19th century.
2
4000
2000
00:21
It was said to echo in Churchill's brain
3
6000
3000
00:24
in the 1930s.
4
9000
2000
00:26
And the poem goes:
5
11000
2000
00:28
"On the idle hill of summer,
6
13000
2000
00:30
lazy with the flow of streams,
7
15000
2000
00:32
hark I hear a distant drummer,
8
17000
2000
00:34
drumming like a sound in dreams,
9
19000
2000
00:36
far and near and low and louder on the roads of earth go by,
10
21000
3000
00:39
dear to friend and food to powder,
11
24000
3000
00:42
soldiers marching,
12
27000
2000
00:44
soon to die."
13
29000
2000
00:46
Those who are interested in poetry,
14
31000
2000
00:48
the poem is "A Shropshire Lad" written by A.E. Housman.
15
33000
3000
00:51
But what Housman understood,
16
36000
2000
00:53
and you hear it in the symphonies of Nielsen too,
17
38000
4000
00:57
was that the long, hot, silvan summers
18
42000
4000
01:01
of stability of the 19th century
19
46000
2000
01:03
were coming to a close,
20
48000
2000
01:05
and that we were about to move
21
50000
2000
01:07
into one of those terrifying periods of history
22
52000
2000
01:09
when power changes.
23
54000
2000
01:11
And these are always periods, ladies and gentlemen,
24
56000
2000
01:13
accompanied by turbulence,
25
58000
3000
01:16
and all too often by blood.
26
61000
2000
01:18
And my message for you
27
63000
2000
01:20
is that I believe we are condemned, if you like,
28
65000
2000
01:22
to live at just one of those moments in history
29
67000
3000
01:25
when the gimbals upon which
30
70000
2000
01:27
the established order of power is beginning to change
31
72000
3000
01:30
and the new look of the world,
32
75000
2000
01:32
the new powers that exist in the world,
33
77000
3000
01:35
are beginning to take form.
34
80000
2000
01:37
And these are -- and we see it very clearly today --
35
82000
3000
01:40
nearly always highly turbulent times, highly difficult times,
36
85000
3000
01:43
and all too often very bloody times.
37
88000
2000
01:45
By the way, it happens about once every century.
38
90000
3000
01:48
You might argue that the last time it happened --
39
93000
2000
01:50
and that's what Housman felt coming and what Churchill felt too --
40
95000
3000
01:53
was that when power passed from the old nations,
41
98000
3000
01:56
the old powers of Europe,
42
101000
2000
01:58
across the Atlantic to the new emerging power
43
103000
2000
02:00
of the United States of America --
44
105000
2000
02:02
the beginning of the American century.
45
107000
2000
02:04
And of course, into the vacuum
46
109000
2000
02:06
where the too-old European powers used to be
47
111000
3000
02:09
were played the two bloody catastrophes
48
114000
3000
02:12
of the last century --
49
117000
2000
02:14
the one in the first part and the one in the second part: the two great World Wars.
50
119000
3000
02:17
Mao Zedong used to refer to them as the European civil wars,
51
122000
3000
02:20
and it's probably a more accurate way of describing them.
52
125000
3000
02:23
Well, ladies and gentlemen,
53
128000
2000
02:25
we live at one of those times.
54
130000
2000
02:27
But for us, I want to talk about three factors today.
55
132000
3000
02:30
And the first of these, the first two of these,
56
135000
3000
02:33
is about a shift in power.
57
138000
2000
02:35
And the second is about some new dimension which I want to refer to,
58
140000
3000
02:38
which has never quite happened in the way it's happening now.
59
143000
3000
02:41
But let's talk about the shifts of power that are occurring to the world.
60
146000
3000
02:44
And what is happening today
61
149000
2000
02:46
is, in one sense, frightening
62
151000
2000
02:48
because it's never happened before.
63
153000
3000
02:51
We have seen lateral shifts of power --
64
156000
2000
02:53
the power of Greece passed to Rome
65
158000
3000
02:56
and the power shifts that occurred
66
161000
2000
02:58
during the European civilizations --
67
163000
3000
03:01
but we are seeing something slightly different.
68
166000
2000
03:03
For power is not just moving laterally
69
168000
2000
03:05
from nation to nation.
70
170000
2000
03:07
It's also moving vertically.
71
172000
2000
03:09
What's happening today is that the power that was encased,
72
174000
3000
03:12
held to accountability, held to the rule of law,
73
177000
3000
03:15
within the institution of the nation state
74
180000
3000
03:18
has now migrated in very large measure onto the global stage.
75
183000
3000
03:21
The globalization of power --
76
186000
2000
03:23
we talk about the globalization of markets,
77
188000
2000
03:25
but actually it's the globalization of real power.
78
190000
4000
03:29
And where, at the nation state level
79
194000
2000
03:31
that power is held to accountability
80
196000
2000
03:33
subject to the rule of law,
81
198000
2000
03:35
on the international stage it is not.
82
200000
3000
03:38
The international stage and the global stage where power now resides:
83
203000
3000
03:41
the power of the Internet, the power of the satellite broadcasters,
84
206000
3000
03:44
the power of the money changers --
85
209000
3000
03:47
this vast money-go-round
86
212000
2000
03:49
that circulates now 32 times the amount of money necessary
87
214000
4000
03:53
for the trade it's supposed to be there to finance --
88
218000
3000
03:56
the money changers, if you like,
89
221000
2000
03:58
the financial speculators
90
223000
2000
04:00
that have brought us all to our knees quite recently,
91
225000
3000
04:03
the power of the multinational corporations
92
228000
2000
04:05
now developing budgets
93
230000
3000
04:08
often bigger than medium-sized countries.
94
233000
2000
04:10
These live in a global space
95
235000
2000
04:12
which is largely unregulated,
96
237000
2000
04:14
not subject to the rule of law,
97
239000
3000
04:17
and in which people may act free of constraint.
98
242000
2000
04:19
Now that suits the powerful
99
244000
3000
04:22
up to a moment.
100
247000
2000
04:24
It's always suitable for those who have the most power
101
249000
3000
04:27
to operate in spaces without constraint,
102
252000
3000
04:30
but the lesson of history is that, sooner or later,
103
255000
3000
04:33
unregulated space --
104
258000
2000
04:35
space not subject to the rule of law --
105
260000
2000
04:37
becomes populated, not just by the things you wanted --
106
262000
3000
04:40
international trade, the Internet, etc. --
107
265000
2000
04:42
but also by the things you don't want --
108
267000
2000
04:44
international criminality, international terrorism.
109
269000
3000
04:47
The revelation of 9/11
110
272000
2000
04:49
is that even if you are the most powerful nation on earth,
111
274000
5000
04:54
nevertheless,
112
279000
3000
04:57
those who inhabit that space can attack you
113
282000
2000
04:59
even in your most iconic of cities
114
284000
2000
05:01
one bright September morning.
115
286000
2000
05:03
It's said that something like 60 percent
116
288000
2000
05:05
of the four million dollars that was taken to fund 9/11
117
290000
3000
05:08
actually passed through the institutions of the Twin Towers
118
293000
3000
05:11
which 9/11 destroyed.
119
296000
2000
05:13
You see, our enemies also use this space --
120
298000
2000
05:15
the space of mass travel, the Internet, satellite broadcasters --
121
300000
3000
05:18
to be able to get around their poison,
122
303000
3000
05:21
which is about destroying our systems and our ways.
123
306000
3000
05:24
Sooner or later,
124
309000
2000
05:26
sooner or later,
125
311000
2000
05:28
the rule of history
126
313000
2000
05:30
is that where power goes
127
315000
2000
05:32
governance must follow.
128
317000
3000
05:35
And if it is therefore the case, as I believe it is,
129
320000
2000
05:37
that one of the phenomenon of our time
130
322000
2000
05:39
is the globalization of power,
131
324000
2000
05:41
then it follows that one of the challenges of our time
132
326000
3000
05:44
is to bring governance to the global space.
133
329000
3000
05:47
And I believe that the decades ahead of us now
134
332000
3000
05:50
will be to a greater or lesser extent turbulent
135
335000
4000
05:54
the more or less we are able to achieve that aim:
136
339000
3000
05:57
to bring governance to the global space.
137
342000
2000
05:59
Now notice, I'm not talking about government.
138
344000
2000
06:01
I'm not talking about setting up
139
346000
2000
06:03
some global democratic institution.
140
348000
3000
06:06
My own view, by the way, ladies and gentlemen,
141
351000
2000
06:08
is that this is unlikely to be done
142
353000
2000
06:10
by spawning more U.N. institutions.
143
355000
2000
06:12
If we didn't have the U.N., we'd have to invent it.
144
357000
2000
06:14
The world needs an international forum.
145
359000
2000
06:16
It needs a means by which you can legitimize international action.
146
361000
4000
06:20
But when it comes to governance of the global space,
147
365000
2000
06:22
my guess is this won't happen
148
367000
3000
06:25
through the creation of more U.N. institutions.
149
370000
2000
06:27
It will actually happen by the powerful coming together
150
372000
3000
06:30
and making treaty-based systems,
151
375000
2000
06:32
treaty-based agreements,
152
377000
2000
06:34
to govern that global space.
153
379000
2000
06:36
And if you look, you can see them happening, already beginning to emerge.
154
381000
3000
06:39
The World Trade Organization: treaty-based organization,
155
384000
3000
06:42
entirely treaty-based,
156
387000
2000
06:44
and yet, powerful enough to hold even the most powerful, the United States,
157
389000
3000
06:47
to account if necessary.
158
392000
2000
06:49
Kyoto: the beginnings of struggling to create
159
394000
2000
06:51
a treaty-based organization.
160
396000
2000
06:53
The G20:
161
398000
2000
06:55
we know now that we have to put together an institution
162
400000
2000
06:57
which is capable of bringing governance
163
402000
2000
06:59
to that financial space for financial speculation.
164
404000
3000
07:02
And that's what the G20 is, a treaty-based institution.
165
407000
3000
07:05
Now there's a problem there,
166
410000
2000
07:07
and we'll come back to it in a minute,
167
412000
2000
07:09
which is that if you bring the most powerful together
168
414000
3000
07:12
to make the rules in treaty-based institutions,
169
417000
2000
07:14
to fill that governance space,
170
419000
3000
07:17
then what happens to the weak who are left out?
171
422000
3000
07:20
And that's a big problem,
172
425000
2000
07:22
and we'll return to it in just a second.
173
427000
2000
07:24
So there's my first message,
174
429000
2000
07:26
that if you are to pass through these turbulent times
175
431000
3000
07:29
more or less turbulently,
176
434000
3000
07:32
then our success in doing that
177
437000
2000
07:34
will in large measure depend on our capacity
178
439000
2000
07:36
to bring sensible governance
179
441000
2000
07:38
to the global space.
180
443000
2000
07:40
And watch that beginning to happen.
181
445000
3000
07:43
My second point is,
182
448000
2000
07:45
and I know I don't have to talk to an audience like this
183
450000
2000
07:47
about such a thing,
184
452000
2000
07:49
but power is not just shifting vertically,
185
454000
3000
07:52
it's also shifting horizontally.
186
457000
2000
07:54
You might argue that the story, the history of civilizations,
187
459000
3000
07:57
has been civilizations gathered around seas --
188
462000
3000
08:00
with the first ones around the Mediterranean,
189
465000
3000
08:03
the more recent ones in the ascendents of Western power around the Atlantic.
190
468000
4000
08:07
Well it seems to me
191
472000
2000
08:09
that we're now seeing a fundamental shift of power, broadly speaking,
192
474000
3000
08:12
away from nations gathered around the Atlantic [seaboard]
193
477000
3000
08:15
to the nations gathered around the Pacific rim.
194
480000
2000
08:17
Now that begins with economic power,
195
482000
2000
08:19
but that's the way it always begins.
196
484000
2000
08:21
You already begin to see the development of foreign policies,
197
486000
3000
08:24
the augmentation of military budgets
198
489000
2000
08:26
occurring in the other growing powers in the world.
199
491000
3000
08:29
I think actually
200
494000
2000
08:31
this is not so much a shift from the West to the East;
201
496000
2000
08:33
something different is happening.
202
498000
2000
08:35
My guess is, for what it's worth,
203
500000
2000
08:37
is that the United States will remain
204
502000
2000
08:39
the most powerful nation on earth
205
504000
2000
08:41
for the next 10 years, 15,
206
506000
3000
08:44
but the context in which she holds her power
207
509000
3000
08:47
has now radically altered; it has radically changed.
208
512000
3000
08:50
We are coming out of 50 years,
209
515000
2000
08:52
most unusual years, of history
210
517000
2000
08:54
in which we have had a totally mono-polar world,
211
519000
3000
08:57
in which every compass needle
212
522000
2000
08:59
for or against
213
524000
2000
09:01
has to be referenced by its position to Washington --
214
526000
3000
09:04
a world bestrode by a single colossus.
215
529000
4000
09:08
But that's not a usual case in history.
216
533000
2000
09:10
In fact, what's now emerging
217
535000
2000
09:12
is the much more normal case of history.
218
537000
2000
09:14
You're beginning to see the emergence
219
539000
2000
09:16
of a multi-polar world.
220
541000
2000
09:18
Up until now,
221
543000
2000
09:20
the United States has been the dominant feature of our world.
222
545000
3000
09:23
They will remain the most powerful nation,
223
548000
2000
09:25
but they will be the most powerful nation
224
550000
2000
09:27
in an increasingly multi-polar world.
225
552000
2000
09:29
And you begin to see the alternative centers of power building up --
226
554000
3000
09:32
in China, of course,
227
557000
2000
09:34
though my own guess is that China's ascent to greatness is not smooth.
228
559000
3000
09:37
It's going to be quite grumpy
229
562000
2000
09:39
as China begins to democratize her society
230
564000
2000
09:41
after liberalizing her economy.
231
566000
2000
09:43
But that's a subject of a different discussion.
232
568000
3000
09:46
You see India, you see Brazil.
233
571000
2000
09:48
You see increasingly
234
573000
2000
09:50
that the world now looks actually, for us Europeans,
235
575000
3000
09:53
much more like Europe in the 19th century.
236
578000
3000
09:56
Europe in the 19th century:
237
581000
2000
09:58
a great British foreign secretary, Lord Canning,
238
583000
2000
10:00
used to describe it as the "European concert of powers."
239
585000
3000
10:03
There was a balance, a five-sided balance.
240
588000
2000
10:05
Britain always played to the balance.
241
590000
3000
10:08
If Paris got together with Berlin,
242
593000
2000
10:10
Britain got together with Vienna and Rome to provide a counterbalance.
243
595000
3000
10:13
Now notice,
244
598000
2000
10:15
in a period which is dominated by a mono-polar world,
245
600000
2000
10:17
you have fixed alliances --
246
602000
2000
10:19
NATO, the Warsaw Pact.
247
604000
2000
10:21
A fixed polarity of power
248
606000
2000
10:23
means fixed alliances.
249
608000
2000
10:25
But a multiple polarity of power
250
610000
2000
10:27
means shifting and changing alliances.
251
612000
2000
10:29
And that's the world we're coming into,
252
614000
2000
10:31
in which we will increasingly see
253
616000
2000
10:33
that our alliances are not fixed.
254
618000
2000
10:35
Canning, the great British foreign secretary once said,
255
620000
2000
10:37
"Britain has a common interest,
256
622000
2000
10:39
but no common allies."
257
624000
2000
10:41
And we will see increasingly
258
626000
2000
10:43
that even we in the West
259
628000
2000
10:45
will reach out, have to reach out,
260
630000
2000
10:47
beyond the cozy circle of the Atlantic powers
261
632000
2000
10:49
to make alliances with others
262
634000
2000
10:51
if we want to get things done in the world.
263
636000
3000
10:54
Note, that when we went into Libya,
264
639000
2000
10:56
it was not good enough for the West to do it alone;
265
641000
2000
10:58
we had to bring others in.
266
643000
2000
11:00
We had to bring, in this case, the Arab League in.
267
645000
3000
11:03
My guess is Iraq and Afghanistan are the last times
268
648000
3000
11:06
when the West has tried to do it themselves,
269
651000
2000
11:08
and we haven't succeeded.
270
653000
2000
11:10
My guess
271
655000
2000
11:12
is that we're reaching the beginning of the end of 400 years --
272
657000
3000
11:15
I say 400 years because it's the end of the Ottoman Empire --
273
660000
3000
11:18
of the hegemony of Western power,
274
663000
2000
11:20
Western institutions and Western values.
275
665000
3000
11:24
You know, up until now, if the West got its act together,
276
669000
3000
11:27
it could propose and dispose
277
672000
2000
11:29
in every corner of the world.
278
674000
2000
11:31
But that's no longer true.
279
676000
2000
11:33
Take the last financial crisis
280
678000
2000
11:35
after the Second World War.
281
680000
2000
11:37
The West got together --
282
682000
2000
11:39
the Bretton Woods Institution, World Bank, International Monetary Fund --
283
684000
3000
11:42
the problem solved.
284
687000
2000
11:44
Now we have to call in others.
285
689000
2000
11:46
Now we have to create the G20.
286
691000
2000
11:48
Now we have to reach beyond the cozy circle
287
693000
2000
11:50
of our Western friends.
288
695000
2000
11:52
Let me make a prediction for you,
289
697000
2000
11:54
which is probably even more startling.
290
699000
3000
11:57
I suspect we are now reaching the end
291
702000
3000
12:00
of 400 years
292
705000
2000
12:02
when Western power was enough.
293
707000
2000
12:04
People say to me, "The Chinese, of course,
294
709000
2000
12:06
they'll never get themselves involved
295
711000
2000
12:08
in peace-making, multilateral peace-making around the world."
296
713000
2000
12:10
Oh yes? Why not?
297
715000
2000
12:12
How many Chinese troops
298
717000
2000
12:14
are serving under the blue beret, serving under the blue flag,
299
719000
2000
12:16
serving under the U.N. command in the world today?
300
721000
2000
12:18
3,700.
301
723000
2000
12:20
How many Americans? 11.
302
725000
3000
12:23
What is the largest naval contingent
303
728000
2000
12:25
tackling the issue of Somali pirates?
304
730000
3000
12:28
The Chinese naval contingent.
305
733000
2000
12:30
Of course they are, they are a mercantilist nation.
306
735000
2000
12:32
They want to keep the sea lanes open.
307
737000
2000
12:34
Increasingly, we are going to have to do business
308
739000
3000
12:37
with people with whom we do not share values,
309
742000
3000
12:40
but with whom, for the moment, we share common interests.
310
745000
3000
12:43
It's a whole new different way
311
748000
2000
12:45
of looking at the world that is now emerging.
312
750000
3000
12:48
And here's the third factor,
313
753000
2000
12:50
which is totally different.
314
755000
3000
12:53
Today in our modern world,
315
758000
2000
12:55
because of the Internet,
316
760000
2000
12:57
because of the kinds of things people have been talking about here,
317
762000
3000
13:00
everything is connected to everything.
318
765000
4000
13:04
We are now interdependent.
319
769000
2000
13:06
We are now interlocked,
320
771000
2000
13:08
as nations, as individuals,
321
773000
2000
13:10
in a way which has never been the case before,
322
775000
2000
13:12
never been the case before.
323
777000
3000
13:15
The interrelationship of nations,
324
780000
2000
13:17
well it's always existed.
325
782000
2000
13:19
Diplomacy is about managing the interrelationship of nations.
326
784000
3000
13:22
But now we are intimately locked together.
327
787000
2000
13:24
You get swine flu in Mexico,
328
789000
2000
13:26
it's a problem for Charles de Gaulle Airport
329
791000
2000
13:28
24 hours later.
330
793000
2000
13:30
Lehman Brothers goes down, the whole lot collapses.
331
795000
3000
13:33
There are fires in the steppes of Russia,
332
798000
3000
13:36
food riots in Africa.
333
801000
2000
13:38
We are all now deeply, deeply, deeply interconnected.
334
803000
4000
13:42
And what that means
335
807000
3000
13:45
is the idea of a nation state acting alone,
336
810000
4000
13:49
not connected with others,
337
814000
2000
13:51
not working with others,
338
816000
2000
13:53
is no longer a viable proposition.
339
818000
2000
13:55
Because the actions of a nation state
340
820000
3000
13:58
are neither confined to itself,
341
823000
2000
14:00
nor is it sufficient for the nation state itself
342
825000
2000
14:02
to control its own territory,
343
827000
2000
14:04
because the effects outside the nation state
344
829000
3000
14:07
are now beginning to affect what happens inside them.
345
832000
3000
14:10
I was a young soldier
346
835000
2000
14:12
in the last of the small empire wars of Britain.
347
837000
4000
14:16
At that time, the defense of my country
348
841000
2000
14:18
was about one thing and one thing only:
349
843000
3000
14:21
how strong was our army, how strong was our air force,
350
846000
3000
14:24
how strong was our navy and how strong were our allies.
351
849000
2000
14:26
That was when the enemy was outside the walls.
352
851000
2000
14:28
Now the enemy is inside the walls.
353
853000
3000
14:31
Now if I want to talk about the defense of my country,
354
856000
2000
14:33
I have to speak to the Minister of Health
355
858000
2000
14:35
because pandemic disease is a threat to my security,
356
860000
3000
14:38
I have to speak to the Minister of Agriculture
357
863000
2000
14:40
because food security is a threat to my security,
358
865000
2000
14:42
I have to speak to the Minister of Industry
359
867000
4000
14:46
because the fragility of our hi-tech infrastructure
360
871000
3000
14:49
is now a point of attack for our enemies --
361
874000
2000
14:51
as we see from cyber warfare --
362
876000
2000
14:53
I have to speak to the Minister of Home Affairs
363
878000
3000
14:56
because who has entered my country,
364
881000
2000
14:58
who lives in that terraced house in that inner city
365
883000
3000
15:01
has a direct effect on what happens in my country --
366
886000
2000
15:03
as we in London saw in the 7/7 bombings.
367
888000
4000
15:07
It's no longer the case that the security of a country
368
892000
3000
15:10
is simply a matter for its soldiers and its ministry of defense.
369
895000
3000
15:13
It's its capacity to lock together its institutions.
370
898000
3000
15:16
And this tells you something very important.
371
901000
3000
15:19
It tells you that, in fact,
372
904000
2000
15:21
our governments, vertically constructed,
373
906000
3000
15:24
constructed on the economic model of the Industrial Revolution --
374
909000
2000
15:26
vertical hierarchy, specialization of tasks,
375
911000
3000
15:29
command structures --
376
914000
2000
15:31
have got the wrong structures completely.
377
916000
2000
15:33
You in business know
378
918000
2000
15:35
that the paradigm structure of our time, ladies and gentlemen,
379
920000
2000
15:37
is the network.
380
922000
2000
15:39
It's your capacity to network that matters,
381
924000
2000
15:41
both within your governments and externally.
382
926000
3000
15:44
So here is Ashdown's third law.
383
929000
2000
15:46
By the way, don't ask me about Ashdown's first law and second law
384
931000
3000
15:49
because I haven't invented those yet;
385
934000
2000
15:51
it always sounds better if there's a third law, doesn't it?
386
936000
2000
15:53
Ashdown's third law is that in the modern age,
387
938000
3000
15:56
where everything is connected to everything,
388
941000
2000
15:58
the most important thing about what you can do
389
943000
3000
16:01
is what you can do with others.
390
946000
2000
16:03
The most important bit about your structure --
391
948000
2000
16:05
whether you're a government, whether you're an army regiment,
392
950000
2000
16:07
whether you're a business --
393
952000
2000
16:09
is your docking points, your interconnectors,
394
954000
2000
16:11
your capacity to network with others.
395
956000
2000
16:13
You understand that in industry;
396
958000
2000
16:15
governments don't.
397
960000
3000
16:18
But now one final thing.
398
963000
2000
16:20
If it is the case, ladies and gentlemen -- and it is --
399
965000
3000
16:23
that we are now locked together
400
968000
2000
16:25
in a way that has never been quite the same before,
401
970000
2000
16:27
then it's also the case that we share a destiny with each other.
402
972000
4000
16:31
Suddenly and for the very first time,
403
976000
3000
16:34
collective defense, the thing that has dominated us
404
979000
3000
16:37
as the concept of securing our nations,
405
982000
2000
16:39
is no longer enough.
406
984000
2000
16:41
It used to be the case
407
986000
2000
16:43
that if my tribe was more powerful than their tribe, I was safe;
408
988000
2000
16:45
if my country was more powerful than their country, I was safe;
409
990000
3000
16:48
my alliance, like NATO, was more powerful than their alliance, I was safe.
410
993000
3000
16:51
It is no longer the case.
411
996000
2000
16:53
The advent of the interconnectedness
412
998000
3000
16:56
and of the weapons of mass destruction
413
1001000
2000
16:58
means that, increasingly,
414
1003000
2000
17:00
I share a destiny with my enemy.
415
1005000
2000
17:02
When I was a diplomat
416
1007000
2000
17:04
negotiating the disarmament treaties with the Soviet Union
417
1009000
3000
17:07
in Geneva in the 1970s,
418
1012000
2000
17:09
we succeeded because we understood
419
1014000
2000
17:11
we shared a destiny with them.
420
1016000
2000
17:13
Collective security is not enough.
421
1018000
3000
17:16
Peace has come to Northern Ireland
422
1021000
2000
17:18
because both sides realized that the zero-sum game couldn't work.
423
1023000
3000
17:21
They shared a destiny with their enemies.
424
1026000
3000
17:24
One of the great barriers to peace in the Middle East
425
1029000
2000
17:26
is that both sides, both Israel and, I think, the Palestinians,
426
1031000
3000
17:29
do not understand
427
1034000
2000
17:31
that they share a collective destiny.
428
1036000
3000
17:34
And so suddenly, ladies and gentlemen,
429
1039000
2000
17:36
what has been the proposition
430
1041000
2000
17:38
of visionaries and poets down the ages
431
1043000
3000
17:41
becomes something we have to take seriously
432
1046000
2000
17:43
as a matter of public policy.
433
1048000
2000
17:45
I started with a poem, I'll end with one.
434
1050000
3000
17:48
The great poem of John Donne's.
435
1053000
3000
17:51
"Send not for whom the bell tolls."
436
1056000
4000
17:55
The poem is called "No Man is an Island."
437
1060000
2000
17:57
And it goes:
438
1062000
2000
17:59
"Every man's death affected me,
439
1064000
3000
18:02
for I am involved in mankind,
440
1067000
2000
18:04
send not to ask
441
1069000
2000
18:06
for whom the bell tolls,
442
1071000
2000
18:08
it tolls for thee."
443
1073000
2000
18:10
For John Donne, a recommendation of morality.
444
1075000
3000
18:13
For us, I think,
445
1078000
2000
18:15
part of the equation for our survival.
446
1080000
3000
18:18
Thank you very much.
447
1083000
2000
18:20
(Applause)
448
1085000
3000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Paddy Ashdown - DiplomatPaddy Ashdown is a former member of the British Parliament and a diplomat with a lifelong commitment to international cooperation.
Why you should listen
Throughout his career, Paddy Ashdown has moved across the international stage. He served as a Royal Marine and an intelligence officer in MI6, the Secret Intelligence Service of the United Kingdom, before becoming a member of Parliament. In 1988 he became the first leader of the newly formed Liberal Democrat party. After leaving Parlaiment he served as the High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Paddy Ashdown | Speaker | TED.com