TED2007
Lawrence Lessig: Laws that choke creativity
Filmed:
Readability: 4.4
2,341,393 views
Lawrence Lessig, the Net’s most celebrated lawyer, cites John Philip Sousa, celestial copyrights and the "ASCAP cartel" in his argument for reviving our creative culture.
Lawrence Lessig - Legal activist
Lawrence Lessig has already transformed intellectual-property law with his Creative Commons innovation. Now he's focused on an even bigger problem: The US' broken political system. Full bio
Lawrence Lessig has already transformed intellectual-property law with his Creative Commons innovation. Now he's focused on an even bigger problem: The US' broken political system. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:24
(Applause)
0
0
1000
00:25
I want to talk to you a little bit about user-generated content.
1
1000
4000
00:29
I'm going to tell you three stories on the way to one argument
2
5000
4000
00:33
that's going to tell you a little bit
3
9000
2000
00:35
about how we open user-generated content up for business.
4
11000
4000
00:39
So, here's the first story.
5
15000
1000
00:40
1906. This man, John Philip Sousa, traveled to this place,
6
16000
6000
00:46
the United States Capitol, to talk about this technology,
7
22000
4000
00:50
what he called the, quote, "talking machines."
8
26000
3000
00:54
Sousa was not a fan of the talking machines.
9
30000
4000
00:58
This is what he had to say.
10
34000
1000
00:59
"These talking machines are going to ruin artistic development
11
35000
4000
01:03
of music in this country.
12
39000
1000
01:04
When I was a boy, in front of every house in the summer evenings,
13
40000
5000
01:09
you would find young people together
14
45000
2000
01:11
singing the songs of the day, or the old songs.
15
47000
4000
01:15
Today, you hear these infernal machines going night and day.
16
51000
6000
01:21
We will not have a vocal chord left," Sousa said.
17
57000
3000
01:24
"The vocal chords will be eliminated by a process of evolution
18
60000
4000
01:28
as was the tail of man when he came from the ape."
19
64000
4000
01:32
Now, this is the picture I want you to focus on.
20
68000
5000
01:37
This is a picture of culture.
21
73000
2000
01:39
We could describe it using modern computer terminology
22
75000
4000
01:43
as a kind of read-write culture.
23
79000
3000
01:46
It's a culture where people participate in the creation
24
82000
3000
01:49
and the re-creation of their culture. In that sense, it's read-write.
25
85000
5000
01:54
Sousa's fear was that we would lose that capacity
26
90000
5000
01:59
because of these, quote, "infernal machines." They would take it away.
27
95000
5000
02:04
And in its place, we'd have the opposite of read-write culture,
28
100000
4000
02:08
what we could call read-only culture.
29
104000
3000
02:11
Culture where creativity was consumed
30
107000
3000
02:14
but the consumer is not a creator.
31
110000
3000
02:17
A culture which is top-down, owned,
32
113000
3000
02:20
where the vocal chords of the millions have been lost.
33
116000
4000
02:24
Now, as you look back at the twentieth century,
34
120000
4000
02:28
at least in what we think of as the, quote, "developed world" --
35
124000
5000
02:33
hard not to conclude that Sousa was right.
36
129000
3000
02:36
Never before in the history of human culture
37
132000
3000
02:39
had it been as professionalized, never before as concentrated.
38
135000
4000
02:43
Never before has creativity of the millions
39
139000
3000
02:46
been as effectively displaced,
40
142000
2000
02:48
and displaced because of these, quote, "infernal machines."
41
144000
4000
02:52
The twentieth century was that century
42
148000
2000
02:54
where, at least for those places we know the best,
43
150000
3000
02:57
culture moved from this read-write to read-only existence.
44
153000
7000
03:05
So, second. Land is a kind of property --
45
161000
3000
03:08
it is property. It's protected by law.
46
164000
4000
03:12
As Lord Blackstone described it, land is protected by trespass law,
47
168000
5000
03:17
for most of the history of trespass law,
48
173000
3000
03:20
by presuming it protects the land all the way down below
49
176000
5000
03:25
and to an indefinite extent upward.
50
181000
4000
03:29
Now, that was a pretty good system
51
185000
2000
03:31
for most of the history of the regulation of land,
52
187000
2000
03:33
until this technology came along, and people began to wonder,
53
189000
6000
03:39
were these instruments trespassers
54
195000
3000
03:42
as they flew over land without clearing the rights
55
198000
3000
03:45
of the farms below as they traveled across the country?
56
201000
4000
03:49
Well, in 1945, Supreme Court got a chance to address that question.
57
205000
5000
03:54
Two farmers, Thomas Lee and Tinie Causby, who raised chickens,
58
210000
6000
04:00
had a significant complaint because of these technologies.
59
216000
4000
04:04
The complaint was that their
60
220000
2000
04:06
chickens followed the pattern of the airplanes
61
222000
3000
04:09
and flew themselves into the walls of the barn
62
225000
4000
04:13
when the airplanes flew over the land.
63
229000
2000
04:15
And so they appealed to Lord Blackstone
64
231000
2000
04:17
to say these airplanes were trespassing.
65
233000
3000
04:21
Since time immemorial, the law had said,
66
237000
3000
04:24
you can't fly over the land without permission of the landowner,
67
240000
4000
04:28
so this flight must stop.
68
244000
4000
04:32
Well, the Supreme Court considered this 100-years tradition
69
248000
5000
04:37
and said, in an opinion written by Justice Douglas,
70
253000
4000
04:41
that the Causbys must lose.
71
257000
2000
04:43
The Supreme Court said the doctrine protecting land
72
259000
4000
04:47
all the way to the sky has no place in the modern world,
73
263000
4000
04:51
otherwise every transcontinental flight would
74
267000
3000
04:55
subject the operator to countless trespass suits.
75
271000
3000
04:58
Common sense, a rare idea in the law, but here it was. Common sense --
76
274000
5000
05:03
(Laughter) --
77
279000
1000
05:04
Revolts at the idea. Common sense.
78
280000
4000
05:08
Finally. Before the Internet, the last great terror
79
284000
8000
05:16
to rain down on the content industry
80
292000
3000
05:19
was a terror created by this technology. Broadcasting:
81
295000
6000
05:25
a new way to spread content,
82
301000
3000
05:28
and therefore a new battle over the control
83
304000
4000
05:32
of the businesses that would spread content.
84
308000
4000
05:36
Now, at that time, the entity,
85
312000
2000
05:38
the legal cartel, that controlled the performance rights
86
314000
4000
05:42
for most of the music that would be broadcast
87
318000
4000
05:46
using these technologies was ASCAP.
88
322000
2000
05:48
They had an exclusive license on the most popular content,
89
324000
4000
05:52
and they exercised it in a way that tried to demonstrate
90
328000
4000
05:56
to the broadcasters who really was in charge.
91
332000
3000
05:59
So, between 1931 and 1939, they raised rates by some 448 percent,
92
335000
7000
06:06
until the broadcasters finally got together
93
342000
3000
06:09
and said, okay, enough of this.
94
345000
2000
06:11
And in 1939, a lawyer, Sydney Kaye, started something
95
347000
3000
06:14
called Broadcast Music Inc. We know it as BMI.
96
350000
4000
06:18
And BMI was much more democratic in the art
97
354000
3000
06:21
that it would include within its repertoire,
98
357000
3000
06:24
including African American music for the first time in the repertoire.
99
360000
4000
06:28
But most important was that BMI took public domain works
100
364000
5000
06:33
and made arrangements of them, which they gave away for free
101
369000
4000
06:37
to their subscribers. So that in 1940,
102
373000
4000
06:41
when ASCAP threatened to double their rates,
103
377000
4000
06:45
the majority of broadcasters switched to BMI.
104
381000
3000
06:48
Now, ASCAP said they didn't care.
105
384000
2000
06:50
The people will revolt, they predicted, because the very best music
106
386000
4000
06:54
was no longer available, because they had shifted
107
390000
3000
06:57
to the second best public domain provided by BMI.
108
393000
6000
07:03
Well, they didn't revolt, and in 1941, ASCAP cracked.
109
399000
6000
07:09
And the important point to recognize
110
405000
3000
07:12
is that even though these broadcasters
111
408000
5000
07:17
were broadcasting something you would call second best,
112
413000
2000
07:19
that competition was enough to break, at that time,
113
415000
5000
07:24
this legal cartel over access to music.
114
420000
4000
07:28
Okay. Three stories. Here's the argument.
115
424000
2000
07:32
In my view, the most significant thing to recognize
116
428000
2000
07:34
about what this Internet is doing
117
430000
2000
07:36
is its opportunity to revive the read-write culture
118
432000
4000
07:40
that Sousa romanticized.
119
436000
3000
07:44
Digital technology is the opportunity
120
440000
2000
07:46
for the revival of these vocal chords
121
442000
2000
07:48
that he spoke so passionately to Congress about.
122
444000
4000
07:52
User-generated content, spreading in businesses
123
448000
4000
07:56
in extraordinarily valuable ways like these,
124
452000
3000
07:59
celebrating amateur culture.
125
455000
2000
08:02
By which I don't mean amateurish culture,
126
458000
3000
08:05
I mean culture where people produce
127
461000
3000
08:08
for the love of what they're doing and not for the money.
128
464000
3000
08:12
I mean the culture that your kids are producing all the time.
129
468000
5000
08:17
For when you think of what Sousa romanticized
130
473000
3000
08:20
in the young people together, singing the songs of the day,
131
476000
3000
08:23
of the old songs, you should recognize
132
479000
2000
08:25
what your kids are doing right now.
133
481000
2000
08:28
Taking the songs of the day and the old songs
134
484000
2000
08:30
and remixing them to make them something different.
135
486000
4000
08:34
It's how they understand access to this culture.
136
490000
3000
08:37
So, let's have some very few examples
137
493000
3000
08:40
to get a sense of what I'm talking about here.
138
496000
1000
08:42
Here's something called Anime Music Video, first example,
139
498000
2000
08:44
taking anime captured from television
140
500000
4000
08:48
re-edited to music tracks.
141
504000
2000
08:50
(Music)
142
506000
40000
09:30
This one you should be -- confidence. Jesus survives. Don't worry.
143
546000
5000
09:35
(Music)
144
551000
45000
10:20
(Laughter)
145
596000
8000
10:28
And this is the best.
146
604000
2000
10:30
(Music)
147
606000
3000
10:37
My love ...
148
613000
2000
10:41
There's only you in my life ...
149
617000
4000
10:46
The only thing that's bright ...
150
622000
4000
10:52
My first love ...
151
628000
3000
10:57
You're every breath that I take ...
152
633000
4000
11:01
You're every step I make ...
153
637000
4000
11:07
And I ....
154
643000
4000
11:11
I want to share all my love with you ...
155
647000
10000
11:22
No one else will do ...
156
658000
5000
11:27
And your eyes ...
157
663000
4000
11:31
They tell me how much you care ...
158
667000
6000
11:37
(Music)
159
673000
3000
11:42
So, this is remix, right?
160
678000
2000
11:44
(Applause)
161
680000
5000
11:50
And it's important to emphasize that what this is not
162
686000
2000
11:52
is not what we call, quote, "piracy."
163
688000
3000
11:55
I'm not talking about nor justifying
164
691000
3000
11:58
people taking other people's content in wholesale
165
694000
3000
12:01
and distributing it without the permission of the copyright owner.
166
697000
3000
12:04
I'm talking about people taking and recreating
167
700000
3000
12:07
using other people's content, using digital technologies
168
703000
3000
12:11
to say things differently.
169
707000
2000
12:13
Now, the importance of this
170
709000
1000
12:14
is not the technique that you've seen here.
171
710000
3000
12:18
Because, of course, every technique that you've seen here
172
714000
2000
12:20
is something that television and film producers
173
716000
2000
12:22
have been able to do for the last 50 years.
174
718000
2000
12:24
The importance is that that technique has been democratized.
175
720000
4000
12:29
It is now anybody with access to a $1,500 computer
176
725000
4000
12:34
who can take sounds and images from the culture around us
177
730000
2000
12:36
and use it to say things differently.
178
732000
2000
12:38
These tools of creativity have become tools of speech.
179
734000
5000
12:43
It is a literacy for this generation. This is how our kids speak.
180
739000
6000
12:50
It is how our kids think. It is what your kids are
181
746000
5000
12:55
as they increasingly understand digital technologies
182
751000
4000
12:59
and their relationship to themselves.
183
755000
2000
13:02
Now, in response to this new use of culture using digital technologies,
184
758000
6000
13:09
the law has not greeted this Sousa revival
185
765000
3000
13:13
with very much common sense.
186
769000
1000
13:15
Instead, the architecture of copyright law
187
771000
3000
13:18
and the architecture of digital technologies,
188
774000
2000
13:20
as they interact, have produced the presumption
189
776000
3000
13:23
that these activities are illegal.
190
779000
2000
13:26
Because if copyright law at its core regulates something called copies,
191
782000
3000
13:29
then in the digital world the one fact we can't escape
192
785000
3000
13:32
is that every single use of culture produces a copy.
193
788000
5000
13:37
Every single use therefore requires permission;
194
793000
3000
13:40
without permission, you are a trespasser.
195
796000
3000
13:43
You're a trespasser with about as much sense
196
799000
2000
13:45
as these people were trespassers.
197
801000
4000
13:50
Common sense here, though, has not yet revolted
198
806000
4000
13:54
in response to this response that the law has offered
199
810000
3000
13:57
to these forms of creativity.
200
813000
3000
14:00
Instead, what we've seen
201
816000
1000
14:01
is something much worse than a revolt.
202
817000
3000
14:05
There's a growing extremism that comes from both sides
203
821000
4000
14:09
in this debate, in response to this conflict
204
825000
3000
14:12
between the law and the use of these technologies.
205
828000
3000
14:15
One side builds new technologies, such as one recently announced
206
831000
4000
14:19
that will enable them
207
835000
3000
14:22
to automatically take down from sites like YouTube
208
838000
2000
14:25
any content that has any copyrighted content in it,
209
841000
2000
14:27
whether or not there's a judgment of fair use
210
843000
2000
14:30
that might be applied to the use of that content.
211
846000
2000
14:32
And on the other side, among our kids,
212
848000
3000
14:35
there's a growing copyright abolitionism,
213
851000
3000
14:39
a generation that rejects the very notion
214
855000
3000
14:42
of what copyright is supposed to do, rejects copyright
215
858000
3000
14:45
and believes that the law is nothing more than an ass
216
861000
3000
14:48
to be ignored and to be fought at every opportunity possible.
217
864000
7000
14:55
The extremism on one side begets extremism on the other,
218
871000
4000
14:59
a fact we should have learned many, many times over,
219
875000
4000
15:03
and both extremes in this debate are just wrong.
220
879000
3000
15:07
Now, the balance that I try to fight for,
221
883000
3000
15:11
I, as any good liberal, try to fight for first
222
887000
2000
15:13
by looking to the government. Total mistake, right?
223
889000
4000
15:17
(Laughter)
224
893000
1000
15:18
Looked first to the courts and the legislatures to try to get them
225
894000
3000
15:21
to do something to make the system make more sense.
226
897000
2000
15:23
It failed partly because the courts are too passive,
227
899000
4000
15:27
partly because the legislatures are corrupted,
228
903000
2000
15:29
by which I don't mean that there's bribery
229
905000
2000
15:32
operating to stop real change,
230
908000
3000
15:35
but more the economy of influence that governs how Congress functions
231
911000
4000
15:39
means that policymakers here will not understand this
232
915000
4000
15:43
until it's too late to fix it.
233
919000
2000
15:45
So, we need something different, we need a different kind of solution.
234
921000
4000
15:49
And the solution here, in my view, is a private solution,
235
925000
3000
15:53
a solution that looks to legalize what it is to be young again,
236
929000
4000
15:57
and to realize the economic potential of that,
237
933000
2000
15:59
and that's where the story of BMI becomes relevant.
238
935000
4000
16:03
Because, as BMI demonstrated, competition here
239
939000
3000
16:06
can achieve some form of balance. The same thing can happen now.
240
942000
5000
16:11
We don't have a public domain to draw upon now,
241
947000
3000
16:14
so instead what we need is two types of changes.
242
950000
3000
16:17
First, that artists and creators embrace the idea,
243
953000
4000
16:21
choose that their work be made available more freely.
244
957000
4000
16:25
So, for example, they can say their work is available freely
245
961000
3000
16:28
for non-commercial, this amateur-type of use,
246
964000
2000
16:30
but not freely for any commercial use.
247
966000
2000
16:32
And second, we need the businesses
248
968000
3000
16:35
that are building out this read-write culture
249
971000
3000
16:38
to embrace this opportunity expressly, to enable it,
250
974000
5000
16:43
so that this ecology of free content, or freer content,
251
979000
5000
16:48
can grow on a neutral platform
252
984000
2000
16:50
where they both exist simultaneously,
253
986000
3000
16:53
so that more-free can compete with less-free,
254
989000
5000
16:58
and the opportunity to develop the creativity in that competition
255
994000
4000
17:02
can teach one the lessons of the other.
256
998000
3000
17:05
Now, I would talk about one particular such plan
257
1001000
4000
17:09
that I know something about,
258
1005000
1000
17:10
but I don't want to violate TED's first commandment of selling,
259
1006000
3000
17:13
so I'm not going to talk about this at all.
260
1009000
2000
17:15
I'm instead just going to remind you of the point that BMI teaches us.
261
1011000
6000
17:22
That artist choice is the key for new technology
262
1018000
5000
17:27
having an opportunity to be open for business,
263
1023000
3000
17:30
and we need to build artist choice here
264
1026000
3000
17:33
if these new technologies are to have that opportunity.
265
1029000
3000
17:36
But let me end with something I think much more important --
266
1032000
3000
17:39
much more important than business.
267
1035000
1000
17:41
It's the point about how this connects to our kids.
268
1037000
2000
17:44
We have to recognize they're different from us. This is us, right?
269
1040000
5000
17:49
(Laughter)
270
1045000
1000
17:50
We made mixed tapes; they remix music.
271
1046000
2000
17:52
We watched TV; they make TV.
272
1048000
3000
17:55
It is technology that has made them different,
273
1051000
3000
17:59
and as we see what this technology can do,
274
1055000
2000
18:01
we need to recognize you can't kill
275
1057000
2000
18:04
the instinct the technology produces. We can only criminalize it.
276
1060000
4000
18:08
We can't stop our kids from using it.
277
1064000
2000
18:10
We can only drive it underground.
278
1066000
2000
18:12
We can't make our kids passive again.
279
1068000
3000
18:15
We can only make them, quote, "pirates." And is that good?
280
1071000
4000
18:20
We live in this weird time. It's kind of age of prohibitions,
281
1076000
4000
18:24
where in many areas of our life,
282
1080000
2000
18:26
we live life constantly against the law.
283
1082000
3000
18:29
Ordinary people live life against the law,
284
1085000
2000
18:31
and that's what I -- we are doing to our kids.
285
1087000
3000
18:35
They live life knowing they live it against the law.
286
1091000
3000
18:39
That realization is extraordinarily corrosive,
287
1095000
4000
18:43
extraordinarily corrupting.
288
1099000
2000
18:46
And in a democracy, we ought to be able to do better.
289
1102000
4000
18:50
Do better, at least for them, if not for opening for business.
290
1106000
6000
18:57
Thank you very much.
291
1113000
1000
18:58
(Applause)
292
1114000
6000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Lawrence Lessig - Legal activistLawrence Lessig has already transformed intellectual-property law with his Creative Commons innovation. Now he's focused on an even bigger problem: The US' broken political system.
Why you should listen
Lawyer and activist Lawrence Lessig spent a decade arguing for sensible intellectual property law, updated for the digital age. He was a founding board member of Creative Commons, an organization that builds better copyright practices through principles established first by the open-source software community.
In 2007, just after his last TED Talk, Lessig announced he was leaving the field of IP and Internet policy, and moving on to a more fundamental problem that blocks all types of sensible policy -- the corrupting influence of money in American politics.
In 2011, Lessig founded Rootstrikers, an organization dedicated to changing the influence of money in Congress. In his latest book, Republic, Lost, he shows just how far the U.S. has spun off course -- and how citizens can regain control. As The New York Times wrote about him, “Mr. Lessig’s vision is at once profoundly pessimistic -- the integrity of the nation is collapsing under the best of intentions --and deeply optimistic. Simple legislative surgery, he says, can put the nation back on the path to greatness.”
Read an excerpt of Lessig's new book, Lesterland >>
Lawrence Lessig | Speaker | TED.com