ABOUT THE SPEAKER
James Beacham - Experimental particle physicist
James Beacham is an experimental high-energy particle physicist working with the ATLAS collaboration at CERN's Large Hadron Collider.

Why you should listen

As part of the ATLAS collaboration at CERN's Large Hadron Collider, one of the teams that discovered the Higgs boson in 2012, James Beacham is on the hunt for evidence of new particles -- dark photons, gravitons, dark matter and exotic Higgs bosons among them.

Previously, Beacham was part of a small team of researchers who, in 2009, searched for the Higgs boson in an unlikely place: data taken by the ALEPH experiment at CERN's Large Electron-Positron collider, nine years after it had stopped running. He has also worked with the APEX collaboration, a groundbreaking search for dark photons using existing particle physics facilities designed for very different purposes.

Beacham completed his PhD at New York University in 2014 and is currently a post-doctoral researcher with the ATLAS experiment group of the Ohio State University. He has been a guest on NPR's "Science Friday," participated in documentaries on the BBC and the Discovery Channel and talked particle physics with the New York Times and WIRED.

In addition to his ongoing research, Beacham is dedicated to making particle physics accessible to all. He has communicated science to the public with Symmetry Magazine, US/LHC, the Science Museum in London, the Institute of Physics, the World Science Fair and on the Web.

In 2015, Beacham organized Ex/Noise/CERN, a project colliding particle physics with experimental music to celebrate the LHC’s switch on to 13 trillion electron volts.

More profile about the speaker
James Beacham | Speaker | TED.com
TEDxBerlin

James Beacham: How we explore unanswered questions in physics

Filmed:
1,572,345 views

James Beacham looks for answers to the most important open questions of physics using the biggest science experiment ever mounted, CERN's Large Hadron Collider. In this fun and accessible talk about how science happens, Beacham takes us on a journey through extra-spatial dimensions in search of undiscovered fundamental particles (and an explanation for the mysteries of gravity) and details the drive to keep exploring.
- Experimental particle physicist
James Beacham is an experimental high-energy particle physicist working with the ATLAS collaboration at CERN's Large Hadron Collider. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:13
There is something about physics
0
1087
4185
00:17
that has been really bothering me
since I was a little kid.
1
5296
4000
00:23
And it's related to a question
2
11010
1809
00:24
that scientists have been asking
for almost 100 years,
3
12843
3244
00:28
with no answer.
4
16111
1169
00:31
How do the smallest things in nature,
5
19108
3010
00:34
the particles of the quantum world,
6
22142
2153
00:36
match up with the largest
things in nature --
7
24319
3031
00:39
planets and stars and galaxies
held together by gravity?
8
27374
3247
00:43
As a kid, I would puzzle
over questions just like this.
9
31250
2773
00:46
I would fiddle around
with microscopes and electromagnets,
10
34047
2892
00:48
and I would read
about the forces of the small
11
36963
2195
00:51
and about quantum mechanics
12
39182
1334
00:52
and I would marvel at how well
that description matched up
13
40540
3564
00:56
to our observation.
14
44128
1170
00:58
Then I would look at the stars,
15
46220
1583
00:59
and I would read about how well
we understand gravity,
16
47827
2524
01:02
and I would think surely,
there must be some elegant way
17
50375
3350
01:05
that these two systems match up.
18
53749
2645
01:09
But there's not.
19
57021
1401
01:11
And the books would say,
20
59673
1160
01:12
yeah, we understand a lot
about these two realms separately,
21
60857
3183
01:16
but when we try to link
them mathematically,
22
64064
2610
01:18
everything breaks.
23
66698
1330
01:20
And for 100 years,
24
68674
1310
01:22
none of our ideas as to how to solve
this basically physics disaster,
25
70008
5028
01:27
has ever been supported by evidence.
26
75060
1814
01:30
And to little old me --
27
78271
1654
01:31
little, curious, skeptical James --
28
79949
1810
01:33
this was a supremely unsatisfying answer.
29
81783
2868
01:38
So, I'm still a skeptical little kid.
30
86011
2233
01:40
Flash-forward now
to December of 2015,
31
88268
3810
01:45
when I found myself smack in the middle
32
93029
2474
01:47
of the physics world
being flipped on its head.
33
95527
2940
01:51
It all started when we at CERN
saw something intriguing in our data:
34
99999
3320
01:55
a hint of a new particle,
35
103343
2274
01:57
an inkling of a possibly extraordinary
answer to this question.
36
105641
4216
02:03
So I'm still a skeptical
little kid, I think,
37
111777
2127
02:05
but I'm also now a particle hunter.
38
113928
2133
02:08
I am a physicist at CERN's
Large Hadron Collider,
39
116085
3463
02:11
the largest science
experiment ever mounted.
40
119572
3471
02:15
It's a 27-kilometer tunnel
on the border of France and Switzerland
41
123877
3535
02:19
buried 100 meters underground.
42
127436
1850
02:21
And in this tunnel,
43
129310
1154
02:22
we use superconducting magnets
colder than outer space
44
130488
3953
02:26
to accelerate protons
to almost the speed of light
45
134465
3061
02:29
and slam them into each other
millions of times per second,
46
137550
3877
02:33
collecting the debris of these collisions
47
141451
2826
02:36
to search for new, undiscovered
fundamental particles.
48
144301
3971
02:40
Its design and construction
took decades of work
49
148727
2464
02:43
by thousands of physicists
from around the globe,
50
151215
3032
02:46
and in the summer of 2015,
51
154271
2541
02:48
we had been working tirelessly
to switch on the LHC
52
156836
3424
02:52
at the highest energy that humans
have ever used in a collider experiment.
53
160284
4467
02:57
Now, higher energy is important
54
165735
2523
03:00
because for particles,
there is an equivalence
55
168282
2187
03:02
between energy and particle mass,
56
170493
2201
03:04
and mass is just a number
put there by nature.
57
172718
2461
03:08
To discover new particles,
58
176068
1318
03:09
we need to reach these bigger numbers.
59
177410
2122
03:11
And to do that, we have to build
a bigger, higher energy collider,
60
179556
3254
03:14
and the biggest, highest
energy collider in the world
61
182834
2565
03:17
is the Large Hadron Collider.
62
185423
1466
03:20
And then, we collide protons
quadrillions of times,
63
188271
4899
03:25
and we collect this data very slowly,
over months and months.
64
193194
4284
03:30
And then new particles might show up
in our data as bumps --
65
198813
4335
03:35
slight deviations from what you expect,
66
203172
2445
03:37
little clusters of data points
that make a smooth line not so smooth.
67
205641
3967
03:42
For example, this bump,
68
210379
1721
03:45
after months of data-taking in 2012,
69
213010
2533
03:47
led to the discovery
of the Higgs particle --
70
215567
2129
03:49
the Higgs boson --
71
217720
1205
03:50
and to a Nobel Prize
for the confirmation of its existence.
72
218949
3365
03:55
This jump up in energy in 2015
73
223972
3558
04:00
represented the best chance
that we as a species had ever had
74
228628
3292
04:03
of discovering new particles --
75
231944
1477
04:05
new answers to these
long-standing questions,
76
233445
2112
04:07
because it was almost
twice as much energy as we used
77
235581
3097
04:10
when we discovered the Higgs boson.
78
238702
1922
04:12
Many of my colleagues had been working
their entire careers for this moment,
79
240648
3741
04:16
and frankly, to little curious me,
80
244413
2076
04:18
this was the moment
I'd been waiting for my entire life.
81
246513
2910
04:21
So 2015 was go time.
82
249447
1731
04:24
So June 2015,
83
252654
2210
04:27
the LHC is switched back on.
84
255722
2659
04:31
My colleagues and I held our breath
and bit our fingernails,
85
259040
2877
04:33
and then finally we saw
the first proton collisions
86
261941
2511
04:36
at this highest energy ever.
87
264476
1956
04:38
Applause, champagne, celebration.
88
266456
2076
04:40
This was a milestone for science,
89
268556
3596
04:44
and we had no idea what we would find
in this brand-new data.
90
272176
4622
04:51
And then a few weeks later,
we found a bump.
91
279990
2178
04:56
It wasn't a very big bump,
92
284192
1676
04:58
but it was big enough to make
you raise your eyebrow.
93
286952
2512
05:01
But on a scale of one to 10
for eyebrow raises,
94
289488
2251
05:03
if 10 indicates that you've
discovered a new particle,
95
291763
2610
05:06
this eyebrow raise is about a four.
96
294397
1727
05:08
(Laughter)
97
296148
1150
05:10
I spent hours, days, weeks
in secret meetings,
98
298432
5211
05:15
arguing with my colleagues
over this little bump,
99
303667
2360
05:18
poking and prodding it with our most
ruthless experimental sticks
100
306051
3236
05:21
to see if it would withstand scrutiny.
101
309311
1977
05:23
But even after months
of working feverishly --
102
311988
3461
05:27
sleeping in our offices
and not going home,
103
315473
2432
05:29
candy bars for dinner,
104
317929
2077
05:32
coffee by the bucketful --
105
320030
1570
05:33
physicists are machines
for turning coffee into diagrams --
106
321624
4243
05:37
(Laughter)
107
325891
1399
05:39
This little bump would not go away.
108
327314
2536
05:42
So after a few months,
109
330704
2138
05:44
we presented our little bump to the world
with a very clear message:
110
332866
3710
05:49
this little bump is interesting
but it's not definitive,
111
337457
2711
05:52
so let's keep an eye on it
as we take more data.
112
340192
3329
05:55
So we were trying to be
extremely cool about it.
113
343872
2291
05:59
And the world ran with it anyway.
114
347463
2188
06:02
The news loved it.
115
350383
1632
06:04
People said it reminded
them of the little bump
116
352735
2555
06:07
that was shown on the way
toward the Higgs boson discovery.
117
355314
3423
06:10
Better than that,
my theorist colleagues --
118
358761
3128
06:14
I love my theorist colleagues --
119
362548
2317
06:16
my theorist colleagues wrote
500 papers about this little bump.
120
364889
3612
06:20
(Laughter)
121
368525
1455
06:22
The world of particle physics
had been flipped on its head.
122
370574
3966
06:27
But what was it about this particular bump
123
375745
4242
06:32
that caused thousands of physicists
to collectively lose their cool?
124
380011
4090
06:37
This little bump was unique.
125
385596
1436
06:40
This little bump indicated
126
388198
1369
06:41
that we were seeing an unexpectedly
large number of collisions
127
389591
3022
06:44
whose debris consisted
of only two photons,
128
392637
3331
06:47
two particles of light.
129
395992
1244
06:49
And that's rare.
130
397260
1237
06:51
Particle collisions are not
like automobile collisions.
131
399069
2620
06:53
They have different rules.
132
401713
1519
06:55
When two particles collide
at almost the speed of light,
133
403256
2650
06:57
the quantum world takes over.
134
405930
1421
06:59
And in the quantum world,
135
407375
1260
07:00
these two particles
can briefly create a new particle
136
408659
3193
07:03
that lives for a tiny fraction of a second
137
411876
2780
07:06
before splitting into other particles
that hit our detector.
138
414680
2881
07:09
Imagine a car collision
where the two cars vanish upon impact,
139
417585
3405
07:13
a bicycle appears in their place --
140
421014
2269
07:15
(Laughter)
141
423307
1071
07:16
And then that bicycle explodes
into two skateboards,
142
424402
2461
07:18
which hit our detector.
143
426887
1181
07:20
(Laughter)
144
428092
1379
07:21
Hopefully, not literally.
145
429495
1953
07:23
They're very expensive.
146
431472
1342
07:26
Events where only two photons
hit out detector are very rare.
147
434191
3748
07:29
And because of the special
quantum properties of photons,
148
437963
3722
07:33
there's a very small number
of possible new particles --
149
441709
3788
07:37
these mythical bicycles --
150
445521
1497
07:39
that can give birth to only two photons.
151
447042
2243
07:41
But one of these options is huge,
152
449812
2836
07:44
and it has to do with
that long-standing question
153
452672
2836
07:47
that bothered me as a tiny little kid,
154
455532
2522
07:50
about gravity.
155
458078
1360
07:53
Gravity may seem super strong to you,
156
461946
2672
07:56
but it's actually crazily weak
compared to the other forces of nature.
157
464642
4100
08:00
I can briefly beat gravity when I jump,
158
468766
2631
08:04
but I can't pick a proton out of my hand.
159
472390
2843
08:08
The strength of gravity compared
to the other forces of nature?
160
476463
3216
08:12
It's 10 to the minus 39.
161
480480
2190
08:14
That's a decimal with 39 zeros after it.
162
482694
2537
08:17
Worse than that,
163
485255
1157
08:18
all of the other known forces of nature
are perfectly described
164
486436
3027
08:21
by this thing we call the Standard Model,
165
489487
2037
08:23
which is our current best description
of nature at its smallest scales,
166
491548
3435
08:27
and quite frankly,
167
495007
1156
08:28
one of the most successful
achievements of humankind --
168
496187
4177
08:32
except for gravity, which is absent
from the Standard Model.
169
500388
4012
08:36
It's crazy.
170
504424
1150
08:38
It's almost as though most
of gravity has gone missing.
171
506046
3100
08:42
We feel a little bit of it,
172
510394
1667
08:44
but where's the rest of it?
173
512085
1676
08:45
No one knows.
174
513785
1282
08:48
But one theoretical explanation
proposes a wild solution.
175
516003
4403
08:54
You and I --
176
522120
1339
08:55
even you in the back --
177
523483
1578
08:57
we live in three dimensions of space.
178
525085
2145
08:59
I hope that's a
non-controversial statement.
179
527254
2557
09:01
(Laughter)
180
529835
1829
09:03
All of the known particles also live
in three dimensions of space.
181
531688
3438
09:07
In fact, a particle is just another name
182
535150
2190
09:09
for an excitation
in a three-dimensional field;
183
537364
3009
09:12
a localized wobbling in space.
184
540397
1920
09:15
More importantly, all the math
that we use to describe all this stuff
185
543288
3529
09:18
assumes that there are only
three dimensions of space.
186
546841
3073
09:21
But math is math, and we can play
around with our math however we want.
187
549938
3381
09:25
And people have been playing around
with extra dimensions of space
188
553343
3166
09:28
for a very long time,
189
556533
1155
09:29
but it's always been an abstract
mathematical concept.
190
557712
2585
09:32
I mean, just look around you --
you at the back, look around --
191
560321
3172
09:35
there's clearly only
three dimensions of space.
192
563517
2281
09:38
But what if that's not true?
193
566954
1559
09:42
What if the missing gravity is leaking
into an extra-spatial dimension
194
570109
6255
09:48
that's invisible to you and I?
195
576388
1956
09:51
What if gravity is just as strong
as the other forces
196
579355
3094
09:54
if you were to view it in this
extra-spatial dimension,
197
582473
3141
09:57
and what you and I experience
is a tiny slice of gravity
198
585638
2900
10:00
make it seem very weak?
199
588562
1897
10:04
If this were true,
200
592158
1175
10:05
we would have to expand
our Standard Model of particles
201
593357
2748
10:08
to include an extra particle,
a hyperdimensional particle of gravity,
202
596129
4086
10:12
a special graviton that lives
in extra-spatial dimensions.
203
600239
2995
10:15
I see the looks on your faces.
204
603258
1465
10:16
You should be asking me the question,
205
604747
1819
10:18
"How in the world are we going to test
this crazy, science fiction idea,
206
606590
3644
10:22
stuck as we are in three dimensions?"
207
610258
2491
10:24
The way we always do,
208
612773
1282
10:26
by slamming together two protons --
209
614079
2139
10:28
(Laughter)
210
616242
1152
10:29
Hard enough that
the collision reverberates
211
617418
2564
10:32
into any extra-spatial dimensions
that might be there,
212
620006
2691
10:34
momentarily creating
this hyperdimensional graviton
213
622721
2599
10:37
that then snaps back
into the three dimensions of the LHC
214
625344
4380
10:41
and spits off two photons,
215
629748
1822
10:44
two particles of light.
216
632278
1338
10:47
And this hypothetical,
extra-dimensional graviton
217
635417
2910
10:50
is one of the only possible,
hypothetical new particles
218
638351
3707
10:54
that has the special quantum properties
219
642082
2135
10:56
that could give birth to our little,
two-photon bump.
220
644241
4236
11:02
So, the possibility of explaining
the mysteries of gravity
221
650000
5820
11:07
and of discovering extra
dimensions of space --
222
655844
3498
11:11
perhaps now you get a sense
223
659366
1592
11:12
as to why thousands of physics geeks
collectively lost their cool
224
660982
4124
11:17
over our little, two-photon bump.
225
665130
1882
11:19
A discovery of this type
would rewrite the textbooks.
226
667036
2900
11:22
But remember,
227
670739
1152
11:23
the message from us experimentalists
228
671915
1724
11:25
that actually were doing
this work at the time,
229
673663
2239
11:27
was very clear:
230
675926
1154
11:29
we need more data.
231
677104
1174
11:30
With more data,
232
678302
1519
11:31
the little bump will either turn into
a nice, crisp Nobel Prize --
233
679845
4024
11:35
(Laughter)
234
683893
1760
11:37
Or the extra data will fill in
the space around the bump
235
685677
2964
11:40
and turn it into a nice, smooth line.
236
688665
1866
11:43
So we took more data,
237
691515
1218
11:44
and with five times the data,
several months later,
238
692757
2577
11:47
our little bump
239
695358
1690
11:49
turned into a smooth line.
240
697072
2348
11:55
The news reported on a "huge
disappointment," on "faded hopes,"
241
703217
3484
11:58
and on particle physicists "being sad."
242
706725
2510
12:01
Given the tone of the coverage,
243
709259
1811
12:03
you'd think that we had decided
to shut down the LHC and go home.
244
711094
3488
12:06
(Laughter)
245
714606
1150
12:08
But that's not what we did.
246
716628
1603
12:13
But why not?
247
721057
2014
12:16
I mean, if I didn't discover
a particle -- and I didn't --
248
724475
2845
12:20
if I didn't discover a particle,
why am I here talking to you?
249
728209
3029
12:23
Why didn't I just hang my head in shame
250
731262
2437
12:25
and go home?
251
733723
1224
12:31
Particle physicists are explorers.
252
739169
3351
12:35
And very much of what we do
is cartography.
253
743421
2952
12:39
Let me put it this way: forget
about the LHC for a second.
254
747468
2852
12:42
Imagine you are a space explorer
arriving at a distant planet,
255
750344
3382
12:45
searching for aliens.
256
753750
1325
12:47
What is your first task?
257
755099
1522
12:49
To immediately orbit the planet,
land, take a quick look around
258
757931
3076
12:53
for any big, obvious signs of life,
259
761031
1886
12:54
and report back to home base.
260
762941
1819
12:56
That's the stage we're at now.
261
764784
1624
12:59
We took a first look at the LHC
262
767269
1487
13:00
for any new, big,
obvious-to-spot particles,
263
768780
2284
13:03
and we can report that there are none.
264
771088
1950
13:05
We saw a weird-looking alien bump
on a distant mountain,
265
773631
2673
13:08
but once we got closer,
we saw it was a rock.
266
776328
2170
13:10
But then what do we do?
Do we just give up and fly away?
267
778816
2640
13:13
Absolutely not;
268
781480
1287
13:14
we would be terrible scientists if we did.
269
782791
2305
13:17
No, we spend the next couple
of decades exploring,
270
785120
3613
13:20
mapping out the territory,
271
788757
1480
13:22
sifting through the sand
with a fine instrument,
272
790261
2365
13:24
peeking under every stone,
273
792650
1458
13:26
drilling under the surface.
274
794132
1554
13:28
New particles can either
show up immediately
275
796106
2593
13:30
as big, obvious-to-spot bumps,
276
798723
2133
13:32
or they can only reveal themselves
after years of data taking.
277
800880
3941
13:38
Humanity has just begun its exploration
at the LHC at this big high energy,
278
806103
4410
13:42
and we have much searching to do.
279
810537
1791
13:44
But what if, even after 10 or 20 years,
we still find no new particles?
280
812352
5825
13:51
We build a bigger machine.
281
819053
1695
13:52
(Laughter)
282
820772
1574
13:54
We search at higher energies.
283
822370
1690
13:56
We search at higher energies.
284
824476
1570
13:58
Planning is already underway
for a 100-kilometer tunnel
285
826946
3053
14:02
that will collide particles
at 10 times the energy of the LHC.
286
830612
2976
14:05
We don't decide where
nature places new particles.
287
833612
2337
14:08
We only decide to keep exploring.
288
836366
1646
14:10
But what if, even after
a 100-kilometer tunnel
289
838036
2558
14:12
or a 500-kilometer tunnel
290
840618
1860
14:14
or a 10,000-kilometer
collider floating in space
291
842502
2841
14:17
between the Earth and the Moon,
292
845367
1578
14:18
we still find no new particles?
293
846969
3062
14:23
Then perhaps we're doing
particle physics wrong.
294
851597
2694
14:26
(Laughter)
295
854315
1791
14:28
Perhaps we need to rethink things.
296
856130
1957
14:31
Maybe we need more resources,
technology, expertise
297
859127
3262
14:34
than what we currently have.
298
862413
1508
14:36
We already use artificial intelligence
and machine learning techniques
299
864610
3341
14:39
in parts of the LHC,
300
867975
1153
14:41
but imagine designing
a particle physics experiment
301
869152
2406
14:43
using such sophisticated algorithms
302
871582
1669
14:45
that it could teach itself to discover
a hyperdimensional graviton.
303
873275
3168
14:48
But what if?
304
876467
1157
14:49
What if the ultimate question:
305
877648
1445
14:51
What if even artificial intelligence
can't help us answer our questions?
306
879117
3473
14:54
What if these open questions,
for centuries,
307
882614
2111
14:56
are destined to be unanswered
for the foreseeable future?
308
884749
2669
14:59
What if the stuff that's bothered me
since I was a little kid
309
887442
2929
15:02
is destined to be unanswered
in my lifetime?
310
890395
2523
15:06
Then that ...
311
894395
1156
15:08
will be even more fascinating.
312
896282
2094
15:12
We will be forced to think
in completely new ways.
313
900144
3225
15:16
We'll have to go back to our assumptions,
314
904361
2058
15:18
and determine if there was
a flaw somewhere.
315
906443
2339
15:21
And we'll need to encourage more people
to join us in studying science
316
909401
3395
15:24
since we need fresh eyes
on these century-old problems.
317
912820
3062
15:27
I don't have the answers,
and I'm still searching for them.
318
915906
3134
15:31
But someone -- maybe
she's in school right now,
319
919064
2329
15:33
maybe she's not even born yet --
320
921417
1684
15:35
could eventually guide us to see physics
in a completely new way,
321
923783
3133
15:38
and to point out that perhaps
we're just asking the wrong questions.
322
926940
4268
15:44
Which would not be the end of physics,
323
932112
2410
15:46
but a novel beginning.
324
934546
1406
15:49
Thank you.
325
937204
1150
15:50
(Applause)
326
938378
2541

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
James Beacham - Experimental particle physicist
James Beacham is an experimental high-energy particle physicist working with the ATLAS collaboration at CERN's Large Hadron Collider.

Why you should listen

As part of the ATLAS collaboration at CERN's Large Hadron Collider, one of the teams that discovered the Higgs boson in 2012, James Beacham is on the hunt for evidence of new particles -- dark photons, gravitons, dark matter and exotic Higgs bosons among them.

Previously, Beacham was part of a small team of researchers who, in 2009, searched for the Higgs boson in an unlikely place: data taken by the ALEPH experiment at CERN's Large Electron-Positron collider, nine years after it had stopped running. He has also worked with the APEX collaboration, a groundbreaking search for dark photons using existing particle physics facilities designed for very different purposes.

Beacham completed his PhD at New York University in 2014 and is currently a post-doctoral researcher with the ATLAS experiment group of the Ohio State University. He has been a guest on NPR's "Science Friday," participated in documentaries on the BBC and the Discovery Channel and talked particle physics with the New York Times and WIRED.

In addition to his ongoing research, Beacham is dedicated to making particle physics accessible to all. He has communicated science to the public with Symmetry Magazine, US/LHC, the Science Museum in London, the Institute of Physics, the World Science Fair and on the Web.

In 2015, Beacham organized Ex/Noise/CERN, a project colliding particle physics with experimental music to celebrate the LHC’s switch on to 13 trillion electron volts.

More profile about the speaker
James Beacham | Speaker | TED.com

Data provided by TED.

This site was created in May 2015 and the last update was on January 12, 2020. It will no longer be updated.

We are currently creating a new site called "eng.lish.video" and would be grateful if you could access it.

If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to write comments in your language on the contact form.

Privacy Policy

Developer's Blog

Buy Me A Coffee