Noah Feldman: Hamilton vs. Madison and the birth of American partisanship
诺亚·费尔德曼: 汉密尔顿 vs. 麦迪逊:美国党派的诞生
Noah Feldman studies the intersection of religion, politics and law. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
如果你一直在思考美国的政治
for the last year or so,
like the following three propositions:
has never been so bad before;
从未如此糟糕;
it's geographically spatialized --
这种关系是地理空间化的
which want to look outwards,
一边是想要向外看的海岸地区,
which wants to look inwards;
that all three of these propositions,
所有这三个命题,
in almost eerily the same way
throughout US history.
an extraordinary mechanism
factional disagreement and partisanship.
党派分歧和党派关系。
supplely designed entity
设计精良的实体
factional disagreement
for overcoming that disagreement
尽可能克服
to a pivotal moment in US history,
and partisanship was born.
when partisanship snapped into place.
of that story is James Madison.
是詹姆斯·麦迪逊。
of not only the US Constitution,
more globally,
designed, passed and gotten ratified
设计,通过并得到批准
some sense of the enormity
couldn't have known it at the time,
that he invented is still in use
of contexts all over the world,
to manage governance.
having solved this problem,
宪法问题解决了后,
the results of factions
he had designed a constitution
他设计的宪法
of his constitutional project
called Alexander Hamilton.
叫亚历山大·汉密尔顿。
Madison was not.
是相反两极。
where Madison was restrained.
麦迪逊却更加保守。
to a woman expect for once
and lived happily ever after for 40 years.
40多年来一直幸福生活。
a hip-hop musical --
a hip-hop musical.
一部正经的音乐剧。
the Federalist Papers,
宪法的营销计划,
and wildly successful.
并大获成功。
and infrastructure
for constitutions.
of infrastructure.
the United States a national bank,
创立一个国家银行,
"immortal," his phrase --
“永恒不变的”,
that would enable trade and manufacturing
这将使贸易和制造业
wealth had historically been.
that his old friend Hamilton was wrong
他的老朋友汉密尔顿错了,
were unconstitutional --
违反了宪法,
of the Constitution
the way you would expect.
正如我们可以预料得到的。
his "personal and political enemy" --
他的“个人和政治敌人”
such close friends and such close allies
亲密的朋友、盟友
old-fashioned way.
the Democratic Republican Party --
“民主共和党 ”
called the Federalist Party.
联邦党。
positions on national politics
some manufacturing and some trade
一些制造业和一些贸易
to put in charge of the country.
整个国家的伎俩。
Madison came to believe.
was to look inwards
of Republican virtue,
共和党的美德,
that had made American great,
使美国伟大的价值观
by saying that Madison was naïve,
麦迪逊太天真的,
to turn the United States
on the global scale.
在全球范围内完全不起作用。
to each of their claims,
the views of the other
对方的意见
came entirely through the lens
不是来自共和党
or the Federalist party.
the Constitution did its work.
宪法起了作用。
令人惊讶,
had not fully anticipated.
也没有充分预料到。
when he thought about anything --
都会提出创新的想法 ——
新闻界偏心于联邦党的原因是
that the press was so pro-Federalist
were all Federalists,
who got their capital from Britain,
从大英帝国拿钱
治罪于那些批评政府的人,
criticism of the government --
the freedom of speech,
言论自由,
into the Bill of Rights,
Democratic-Republican Societies --
against Federalist-dominated hegemony.
to win a national election --
became president,
成为总统,
completely out of business.
完全失去业务。
of the Constitution
that actually managed faction
可以管理党派分歧,
in the first place.
that the government was terrible.
政府是可怕的
private groups, individuals,
about fundamental change.
was the separation of powers --
是分权原则,
of the Constitution.
in the United States
unless you bring on board the center.
你无法治理。
that come incredibly fast
马上举行。
注重中间派。
the president, in fact, does not rule
其实总统并不统治
which other people have to agree with --
而这些提案必须经过他人的同意。
to drive presidents
will reveal to you
completely in operation.
follows the rules of the Constitution,
遵循《宪法》的规定,
as indeed has sometimes occurred,
确实有时会发生,
but in the past, in US history.
但在过去,在美国历史上。
they need to win election
他们需要
赢得选举。
in order to pass laws.
以通过法规。
没什么事情可以发生。
then, is the following:
is greater than partisanship.
大于党派。
when that's possible,
在可能的时候,
to overcome partisan division
is a technology that worked
是一种有效的技术
of the Civil War,
that you care about,
that matter to you,
and knowledge and confidence
知识和信心去做,
can do the job that it is designed to do.
它设计好的作用。
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Noah Feldman - Constitutional law scholarNoah Feldman studies the intersection of religion, politics and law.
Why you should listen
Noah Feldman is a professor and writer who tries to figure out how to make the government follow the rules; what the rules are that the government has to follow; and what to do if the rules are being broken. In his work, he asks questions like: How can a 225-year-old constitutional blueprint still work? Can you design a new and better constitution from scratch in places like Iraq and Tunisia? What rights do we have, really?
Feldman is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and a contributing writer for Bloomberg View. He served as senior constitutional advisor to the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq, and advised members of the Iraqi Governing Council on the drafting of the Transitional Administrative Law or interim constitution. He is writing a biography on James Madison, principal author of the Constitution and fourth president of the US; it's forthcoming in 2017.
Feldman is the author of six other books: Cool War: The Future of Global Competition (Random House, 2013); Scorpions: The Battles and Triumphs of FDR’s Great Supreme Court Justices (Twelve Publishing, 2010); The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State (Princeton University Press, 2008); Divided By God: America's Church-State Problem and What We Should Do About It (Farrar, Straus & Giroux 2005); What We Owe Iraq: War and the Ethics of Nation-building (Princeton University Press 2004) and After Jihad: America and the Struggle for Islamic Democracy (Farrar, Straus & Giroux 2003. He most recently co-authored two textbooks: Constitutional Law, Eighteenth Edition (Foundation Press, 2013) and First Amendment Law, Fifth Edition (Foundation Press, 2013).
Noah Feldman | Speaker | TED.com