ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Aaron O'Connell - Physicist
Aaron O'Connell is the first person to experimentally induce and measure quantum effects in the motion of a humanmade object, bridging the quantum and classical worlds.

Why you should listen

Growing up reading philosophy, playing guitar, and generally not thinking about science, Aaron O’Connell never expected to revolutionize the world of physics. But an inspiring stuffed-monkey-shot-from-a-cannon demonstration and a series of positive research experiences as an undergraduate propelled him to graduate school at UCSB.

While there, in an experiment remarkable both for its conceptual simplicity and technical difficulty, O’Connell was the first person to measure quantum effects in an object large enough to see with the naked eye. Named Breakthrough of the year by Science Magazine, the experiment shattered the previous record for the largest quantum object, showing decisively that there is no hard line between the quantum and everyday worlds.

More profile about the speaker
Aaron O'Connell | Speaker | TED.com
TED2011

Aaron O'Connell: Making sense of a visible quantum object

Filmed:
1,482,555 views

Physicists are used to the idea that subatomic particles behave according to the bizarre rules of quantum mechanics, completely different to human-scale objects. In a breakthrough experiment, Aaron O'Connell has blurred that distinction by creating an object that is visible to the unaided eye, but provably in two places at the same time. In this talk he suggests an intriguing way of thinking about the result.
- Physicist
Aaron O'Connell is the first person to experimentally induce and measure quantum effects in the motion of a humanmade object, bridging the quantum and classical worlds. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:15
This is a representation of your brain,
0
0
3000
00:18
and your brain can be broken into two parts.
1
3000
3000
00:21
There's the left half, which is the logical side,
2
6000
2000
00:23
and then the right half,
3
8000
2000
00:25
which is the intuitive.
4
10000
2000
00:27
And so if we had a scale to measure the aptitude of each hemisphere,
5
12000
3000
00:30
then we can plot our brain.
6
15000
2000
00:32
And for example, this would be somebody who's completely logical.
7
17000
3000
00:35
This would be someone who's entirely intuitive.
8
20000
3000
00:39
So where would you put your brain on this scale?
9
24000
3000
00:42
Some of us may have opted for one of these extremes,
10
27000
3000
00:45
but I think for most people in the audience,
11
30000
2000
00:47
your brain is something like this --
12
32000
2000
00:49
with a high aptitude in both hemispheres at the same time.
13
34000
3000
00:52
It's not like they're mutually exclusive or anything.
14
37000
2000
00:54
You can be logical and intuitive.
15
39000
2000
00:56
And so I consider myself one of these people,
16
41000
3000
00:59
along with most of the other experimental quantum physicists,
17
44000
3000
01:02
who need a good deal of logic
18
47000
2000
01:04
to string together these complex ideas.
19
49000
2000
01:06
But at the same time, we need a good deal of intuition
20
51000
3000
01:09
to actually make the experiments work.
21
54000
2000
01:11
How do we develop this intuition? Well we like to play with stuff.
22
56000
3000
01:14
So we go out and play with it, and then we see how it acts,
23
59000
3000
01:17
and then we develop our intuition from there.
24
62000
3000
01:20
And really you do the same thing.
25
65000
2000
01:22
So some intuition
26
67000
2000
01:24
that you may have developed over the years
27
69000
2000
01:26
is that one thing is only in one place at a time.
28
71000
4000
01:30
I mean, it can sound weird to think about
29
75000
3000
01:33
one thing being in two different places at the same time,
30
78000
4000
01:37
but you weren't born with this notion, you developed it.
31
82000
3000
01:40
And I remember watching a kid playing on a car stop.
32
85000
3000
01:43
He was just a toddler and he wasn't very good at it, and he kept falling over.
33
88000
3000
01:46
But I bet playing with this car stop taught him a really valuable lesson,
34
91000
3000
01:49
and that's that large things don't let you get right past them,
35
94000
4000
01:53
and that they stay in one place.
36
98000
3000
01:56
And so this is a great conceptual model to have of the world,
37
101000
3000
01:59
unless you're a particle physicist.
38
104000
2000
02:01
It'd be a terrible model for a particle physicist,
39
106000
2000
02:03
because they don't play with car stops,
40
108000
2000
02:05
they play with these little weird particles.
41
110000
3000
02:08
And when they play with their particles,
42
113000
2000
02:10
they find they do all sorts of really weird things --
43
115000
2000
02:12
like they can fly right through walls,
44
117000
3000
02:15
or they can be in two different places at the same time.
45
120000
4000
02:19
And so they wrote down all these observations,
46
124000
3000
02:22
and they called it the theory of quantum mechanics.
47
127000
4000
02:26
And so that's where physics was at a few years ago;
48
131000
3000
02:29
you needed quantum mechanics
49
134000
2000
02:31
to describe little, tiny particles.
50
136000
2000
02:33
But you didn't need it
51
138000
2000
02:35
to describe the large, everyday objects around us.
52
140000
4000
02:39
This didn't really sit well with my intuition,
53
144000
3000
02:42
and maybe it's just because I don't play with particles very often.
54
147000
3000
02:45
Well, I play with them sometimes,
55
150000
2000
02:47
but not very often.
56
152000
2000
02:49
And I've never seen them.
57
154000
2000
02:51
I mean, nobody's ever seen a particle.
58
156000
3000
02:54
But it didn't sit well with my logical side either.
59
159000
3000
02:57
Because if everything is made up of little particles
60
162000
3000
03:00
and all the little particles
61
165000
2000
03:02
follow quantum mechanics,
62
167000
2000
03:04
then shouldn't everything just follow quantum mechanics?
63
169000
3000
03:09
I don't see any reason why it shouldn't.
64
174000
3000
03:12
And so I'd feel a lot better about the whole thing
65
177000
2000
03:14
if we could somehow show
66
179000
2000
03:16
that an everyday object
67
181000
2000
03:18
also follows quantum mechanics.
68
183000
2000
03:20
So a few years ago, I set off to do just that.
69
185000
3000
03:23
So I made one.
70
188000
3000
03:26
This is the first object
71
191000
2000
03:28
that you can see
72
193000
2000
03:30
that has been in a mechanical quantum superposition.
73
195000
3000
03:33
So what we're looking at here
74
198000
2000
03:35
is a tiny computer chip.
75
200000
2000
03:37
And you can sort of see this green dot right in the middle.
76
202000
3000
03:40
And that's this piece of metal I'm going to be talking about in a minute.
77
205000
3000
03:43
This is a photograph of the object.
78
208000
2000
03:45
And here I'll zoom in a little bit. We're looking right there in the center.
79
210000
3000
03:48
And then here's a really, really big close-up of the little piece of metal.
80
213000
3000
03:51
So what we're looking at is a little chunk of metal,
81
216000
2000
03:53
and it's shaped like a diving board, and it's sticking out over a ledge.
82
218000
3000
03:56
And so I made this thing
83
221000
2000
03:58
in nearly the same way as you make a computer chip.
84
223000
2000
04:00
I went into a clean room with a fresh silicon wafer,
85
225000
3000
04:03
and then I just cranked away at all the big machines for about 100 hours.
86
228000
3000
04:06
For the last stuff, I had to build my own machine --
87
231000
2000
04:08
to make this swimming pool-shaped hole
88
233000
3000
04:11
underneath the device.
89
236000
2000
04:13
This device has the ability
90
238000
2000
04:15
to be in a quantum superposition,
91
240000
2000
04:17
but it needs a little help to do it.
92
242000
2000
04:19
Here, let me give you an analogy.
93
244000
2000
04:21
You know how uncomfortable it is to be in a crowded elevator?
94
246000
3000
04:24
I mean, when I'm in an elevator all alone, I do all sorts of weird things,
95
249000
3000
04:27
but then other people get on board
96
252000
2000
04:29
and I stop doing those things
97
254000
2000
04:31
because I don't want to bother them,
98
256000
2000
04:33
or, frankly, scare them.
99
258000
3000
04:36
So quantum mechanics says
100
261000
2000
04:38
that inanimate objects feel the same way.
101
263000
3000
04:41
The fellow passengers for inanimate objects
102
266000
2000
04:43
are not just people,
103
268000
2000
04:45
but it's also the light shining on it
104
270000
2000
04:47
and the wind blowing past it and the heat of the room.
105
272000
3000
04:50
And so we knew, if we wanted to see
106
275000
2000
04:52
this piece of metal behave quantum mechanically,
107
277000
3000
04:55
we're going to have to kick out all the other passengers.
108
280000
2000
04:57
And so that's what we did.
109
282000
2000
04:59
We turned off the lights,
110
284000
2000
05:01
and then we put it in a vacuum and sucked out all the air,
111
286000
2000
05:03
and then we cooled it down
112
288000
2000
05:05
to just a fraction of a degree above absolute zero.
113
290000
2000
05:07
Now, all alone in the elevator,
114
292000
2000
05:09
the little chunk of metal is free to act however it wanted.
115
294000
2000
05:11
And so we measured its motion.
116
296000
2000
05:13
We found it was moving in really weird ways.
117
298000
2000
05:15
Instead of just sitting perfectly still, it was vibrating,
118
300000
3000
05:18
and the way it was vibrating was breathing something like this --
119
303000
3000
05:21
like expanding and contracting bellows.
120
306000
2000
05:23
And by giving it a gentle nudge,
121
308000
2000
05:25
we were able to make it both vibrate
122
310000
2000
05:27
and not vibrate
123
312000
2000
05:29
at the same time --
124
314000
2000
05:31
something that's only allowed with quantum mechanics.
125
316000
3000
05:34
So what I'm telling you here is something truly fantastic.
126
319000
3000
05:37
What does it mean for one thing
127
322000
2000
05:39
to be both vibrating and not vibrating
128
324000
2000
05:41
at the same time?
129
326000
2000
05:43
So let's think about the atoms.
130
328000
2000
05:45
So in one case:
131
330000
2000
05:47
all the trillions of atoms that make up that chunk of metal
132
332000
3000
05:50
are sitting still
133
335000
2000
05:52
and at the same time those same atoms
134
337000
2000
05:54
are moving up and down.
135
339000
2000
05:56
Now it's only at precise times when they align.
136
341000
3000
05:59
The rest of the time they're delocalized.
137
344000
2000
06:01
That means that every atom
138
346000
2000
06:03
is in two different places at the same time,
139
348000
2000
06:05
which in turn means the entire chunk of metal
140
350000
3000
06:08
is in two different places.
141
353000
2000
06:10
I think this is really cool.
142
355000
2000
06:12
(Laughter)
143
357000
2000
06:14
Really.
144
359000
2000
06:16
(Applause)
145
361000
3000
06:19
It was worth locking myself in a clean room to do this for all those years
146
364000
5000
06:24
because, check this out,
147
369000
2000
06:26
the difference in scale
148
371000
2000
06:28
between a single atom and that chunk of metal
149
373000
2000
06:30
is about the same as the difference
150
375000
2000
06:32
between that chunk of metal and you.
151
377000
2000
06:34
So if a single atom can be in two different places at the same time,
152
379000
3000
06:37
that chunk of metal can be in two different places,
153
382000
3000
06:40
then why not you?
154
385000
2000
06:42
I mean, this is just my logical side talking.
155
387000
3000
06:46
So imagine if you're in multiple places at the same time,
156
391000
4000
06:50
what would that be like?
157
395000
3000
06:53
How would your consciousness
158
398000
2000
06:55
handle your body being delocalized in space?
159
400000
4000
06:59
There's one more part to the story.
160
404000
2000
07:01
It's when we warmed it up,
161
406000
2000
07:03
and we turned on the lights and looked inside the box,
162
408000
3000
07:06
we saw that the piece metal was still there in one piece.
163
411000
4000
07:10
And so I had to develop this new intuition,
164
415000
3000
07:13
that it seems like all the objects in the elevator
165
418000
3000
07:16
are really just quantum objects
166
421000
2000
07:18
just crammed into a tiny space.
167
423000
2000
07:20
You hear a lot of talk
168
425000
2000
07:22
about how quantum mechanics says that everything is all interconnected.
169
427000
3000
07:25
Well, that's not quite right.
170
430000
2000
07:27
It's more than that; it's deeper.
171
432000
3000
07:30
It's that those connections,
172
435000
2000
07:32
your connections to all the things around you,
173
437000
3000
07:35
literally define who you are,
174
440000
3000
07:38
and that's the profound weirdness of quantum mechanics.
175
443000
3000
07:41
Thank you.
176
446000
2000
07:43
(Applause)
177
448000
2000

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Aaron O'Connell - Physicist
Aaron O'Connell is the first person to experimentally induce and measure quantum effects in the motion of a humanmade object, bridging the quantum and classical worlds.

Why you should listen

Growing up reading philosophy, playing guitar, and generally not thinking about science, Aaron O’Connell never expected to revolutionize the world of physics. But an inspiring stuffed-monkey-shot-from-a-cannon demonstration and a series of positive research experiences as an undergraduate propelled him to graduate school at UCSB.

While there, in an experiment remarkable both for its conceptual simplicity and technical difficulty, O’Connell was the first person to measure quantum effects in an object large enough to see with the naked eye. Named Breakthrough of the year by Science Magazine, the experiment shattered the previous record for the largest quantum object, showing decisively that there is no hard line between the quantum and everyday worlds.

More profile about the speaker
Aaron O'Connell | Speaker | TED.com