TED2009
Nate Silver: Does racism affect how you vote?
Filmed:
Readability: 4
498,847 views
Nate Silver has data that answers big questions about race in politics. For instance, in the 2008 presidential race, did Obama's skin color actually keep him from getting votes in some parts of the country? Stats and myths collide in this fascinating talk that ends with a remarkable insight.
Nate Silver - Statistician
Math whiz and baseball fan Nate Silver was mainly known for predicting outcomes in fantasy ballgames -- until his technique hit a home run calling the outcome of the 2008 election primaries. Full bio
Math whiz and baseball fan Nate Silver was mainly known for predicting outcomes in fantasy ballgames -- until his technique hit a home run calling the outcome of the 2008 election primaries. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:15
I want to talk about the election.
0
0
3000
00:18
For the first time in the United States, a predominantly white group of voters
1
3000
3000
00:21
voted for an African-American candidate for President.
2
6000
3000
00:24
And in fact Barack Obama did quite well.
3
9000
2000
00:26
He won 375 electoral votes.
4
11000
2000
00:28
And he won about 70 million popular votes
5
13000
3000
00:31
more than any other presidential candidate --
6
16000
2000
00:33
of any race, of any party -- in history.
7
18000
3000
00:36
If you compare how Obama did against how John Kerry had done four years earlier --
8
21000
4000
00:40
Democrats really like seeing this transition here,
9
25000
3000
00:43
where almost every state becomes bluer, becomes more democratic --
10
28000
4000
00:47
even states Obama lost, like out west,
11
32000
2000
00:49
those states became more blue.
12
34000
2000
00:51
In the south, in the northeast, almost everywhere
13
36000
3000
00:54
but with a couple of exceptions here and there.
14
39000
3000
00:57
One exception is in Massachusetts.
15
42000
2000
00:59
That was John Kerry's home state.
16
44000
2000
01:01
No big surprise, Obama couldn't do better than Kerry there.
17
46000
2000
01:03
Or in Arizona, which is John McCain's home,
18
48000
2000
01:05
Obama didn't have much improvement.
19
50000
2000
01:07
But there is also this part of the country, kind of in the middle region here.
20
52000
2000
01:09
This kind of Arkansas, Tennessee, Oklahoma, West Virginia region.
21
54000
4000
01:13
Now if you look at '96, Bill Clinton --
22
58000
2000
01:15
the last Democrat to actually win -- how he did in '96,
23
60000
3000
01:18
you see real big differences in this part of the country right here,
24
63000
3000
01:21
the kind of Appalachians, Ozarks, highlands region, as I call it:
25
66000
4000
01:25
20 or 30 point swings
26
70000
2000
01:27
from how Bill Clinton did in '96 to how Obama did
27
72000
2000
01:29
in 2008.
28
74000
2000
01:31
Yes Bill Clinton was from Arkansas, but these are very, very profound differences.
29
76000
5000
01:36
So, when we think about parts of the country like Arkansas, you know.
30
81000
2000
01:38
There is a book written called, "What's the Matter with Kansas?"
31
83000
3000
01:41
But really the question here -- Obama did relatively well in Kansas.
32
86000
3000
01:44
He lost badly but every Democrat does.
33
89000
2000
01:46
He lost no worse than most people do.
34
91000
2000
01:48
But yeah, what's the matter with Arkansas?
35
93000
4000
01:52
(Laughter)
36
97000
1000
01:53
And when we think of Arkansas we tend to have pretty negative connotations.
37
98000
3000
01:56
We think of a bunch of rednecks, quote, unquote, with guns.
38
101000
3000
01:59
And we think people like this probably don't want to vote
39
104000
3000
02:02
for people who look like this and are named Barack Obama.
40
107000
3000
02:05
We think it's a matter of race. And is this fair?
41
110000
3000
02:08
Are we kind of stigmatizing people from Arkansas, and this part of the country?
42
113000
3000
02:11
And the answer is: it is at least partially fair.
43
116000
3000
02:14
We know that race was a factor, and the reason why we know that
44
119000
2000
02:16
is because we asked those people.
45
121000
2000
02:18
Actually we didn't ask them, but when they conducted
46
123000
2000
02:20
exit polls in every state,
47
125000
2000
02:22
in 37 states, out of the 50,
48
127000
2000
02:24
they asked a question, that was pretty direct, about race.
49
129000
3000
02:27
They asked this question.
50
132000
2000
02:29
In deciding your vote for President today, was the race
51
134000
2000
02:31
of the candidate a factor?
52
136000
2000
02:33
We're looking for people that said, "Yes, race was a factor;
53
138000
3000
02:36
moreover it was an important factor, in my decision,"
54
141000
2000
02:38
and people who voted for John McCain
55
143000
3000
02:41
as a result of that factor,
56
146000
2000
02:43
maybe in combination with other factors, and maybe alone.
57
148000
2000
02:45
We're looking for this behavior among white voters
58
150000
3000
02:48
or, really, non-black voters.
59
153000
3000
02:51
So you see big differences in different parts
60
156000
2000
02:53
of the country on this question.
61
158000
2000
02:55
In Louisiana, about one in five white voters
62
160000
3000
02:58
said, "Yes, one of the big reasons why I voted against Barack Obama
63
163000
3000
03:01
is because he was an African-American."
64
166000
2000
03:03
If those people had voted for Obama,
65
168000
2000
03:05
even half of them, Obama would have won Louisiana safely.
66
170000
4000
03:09
Same is true with, I think, all of these states you see on the top of the list.
67
174000
2000
03:11
Meanwhile, California, New York, we can say, "Oh we're enlightened"
68
176000
4000
03:15
but you know, certainly a much lower incidence of this
69
180000
2000
03:17
admitted, I suppose,
70
182000
2000
03:19
manifestation of racially-based voting.
71
184000
3000
03:22
Here is the same data on a map.
72
187000
2000
03:24
You kind of see the relationship between
73
189000
2000
03:26
the redder states of where more people responded and said,
74
191000
2000
03:28
"Yes, Barack Obama's race was a problem for me."
75
193000
3000
03:31
You see, comparing the map to '96, you see an overlap here.
76
196000
3000
03:34
This really seems to explain
77
199000
2000
03:36
why Barack Obama did worse
78
201000
2000
03:38
in this one part of the country.
79
203000
2000
03:40
So we have to ask why.
80
205000
2000
03:42
Is racism predictable in some way?
81
207000
2000
03:44
Is there something driving this?
82
209000
2000
03:46
Is it just about some weird stuff that goes on in Arkansas
83
211000
2000
03:48
that we don't understand, and Kentucky?
84
213000
2000
03:50
Or are there more systematic factors at work?
85
215000
2000
03:52
And so we can look at a bunch of different variables.
86
217000
2000
03:54
These are things that economists and political scientists look at all the time --
87
219000
3000
03:57
things like income, and religion, education.
88
222000
3000
04:00
Which of these seem to drive
89
225000
2000
04:02
this manifestation of racism
90
227000
2000
04:04
in this big national experiment we had on November 4th?
91
229000
3000
04:07
And there are a couple of these that have
92
232000
2000
04:09
strong predictive relationships,
93
234000
2000
04:11
one of which is education,
94
236000
3000
04:14
where you see the states with the fewest years of schooling
95
239000
2000
04:16
per adult are in red,
96
241000
2000
04:18
and you see this part of the country, the kind of Appalachians region,
97
243000
3000
04:21
is less educated. It's just a fact.
98
246000
2000
04:23
And you see the relationship there
99
248000
2000
04:25
with the racially-based voting patterns.
100
250000
3000
04:28
The other variable that's important is
101
253000
2000
04:30
the type of neighborhood that you live in.
102
255000
3000
04:33
States that are more rural --
103
258000
2000
04:35
even to some extent of the states like New Hampshire and Maine --
104
260000
2000
04:37
they exhibit a little bit of
105
262000
2000
04:39
this racially-based voting against Barack Obama.
106
264000
3000
04:42
So it's the combination of these two things: it's education
107
267000
2000
04:44
and the type of neighbors that you have,
108
269000
2000
04:46
which we'll talk about more in a moment.
109
271000
2000
04:48
And the thing about states like Arkansas and Tennessee
110
273000
2000
04:50
is that they're both very rural,
111
275000
2000
04:52
and they are educationally impoverished.
112
277000
4000
04:56
So yes, racism is predictable.
113
281000
2000
04:58
These things, among maybe other variables,
114
283000
2000
05:00
but these things seem to predict it.
115
285000
2000
05:02
We're going to drill down a little bit more now,
116
287000
2000
05:04
into something called the General Social Survey.
117
289000
2000
05:06
This is conducted by the University of Chicago
118
291000
2000
05:08
every other year.
119
293000
2000
05:10
And they ask a series of really interesting questions.
120
295000
2000
05:12
In 2000 they had particularly interesting questions
121
297000
2000
05:14
about racial attitudes.
122
299000
2000
05:16
One simple question they asked is,
123
301000
2000
05:18
"Does anyone of the opposite race live in your neighborhood?"
124
303000
4000
05:22
We can see in different types of communities that the results are quite different.
125
307000
3000
05:25
In cites, about 80 percent of people
126
310000
3000
05:28
have someone whom they consider a neighbor of another race,
127
313000
3000
05:31
but in rural communities, only about 30 percent.
128
316000
3000
05:34
Probably because if you live on a farm, you might not have a lot of neighbors, period.
129
319000
3000
05:37
But nevertheless, you're not having a lot of interaction with people
130
322000
3000
05:40
who are unlike you.
131
325000
2000
05:42
So what we're going to do now is take the white people in the survey
132
327000
3000
05:45
and split them between those who have black neighbors --
133
330000
3000
05:48
or, really, some neighbor of another race --
134
333000
2000
05:50
and people who have only white neighbors.
135
335000
3000
05:53
And we see in some variables
136
338000
2000
05:55
in terms of political attitudes, not a lot of difference.
137
340000
2000
05:57
This was eight years ago, some people were more Republican back then.
138
342000
3000
06:00
But you see Democrats versus Republican,
139
345000
2000
06:02
not a big difference based on who your neighbors are.
140
347000
3000
06:05
And even some questions about race -- for example
141
350000
2000
06:07
affirmative action, which is kind of a political question,
142
352000
2000
06:09
a policy question about race, if you will --
143
354000
2000
06:11
not much difference here.
144
356000
2000
06:13
Affirmative action is not very popular frankly, with white voters, period.
145
358000
3000
06:16
But people with black neighbors and people with mono-racial neighborhoods
146
361000
3000
06:19
feel no differently about it really.
147
364000
3000
06:22
But if you probe a bit deeper and get a bit more personal if you will,
148
367000
4000
06:26
"Do you favor a law banning interracial marriage?"
149
371000
2000
06:28
There is a big difference.
150
373000
2000
06:30
People who don't have neighbors of a different race
151
375000
2000
06:32
are about twice as likely
152
377000
2000
06:34
to oppose interracial marriage as people who do.
153
379000
3000
06:37
Just based on who lives in your immediate neighborhood around you.
154
382000
3000
06:40
And likewise they asked, not in 2000, but in the same survey in 1996,
155
385000
4000
06:44
"Would you not vote for a qualified black president?"
156
389000
4000
06:48
You see people without neighbors who are African-American who
157
393000
2000
06:50
were much more likely to say, "That would give me a problem."
158
395000
3000
06:53
So it's really not even about urban versus rural.
159
398000
2000
06:55
It's about who you live with.
160
400000
2000
06:57
Racism is predictable. And it's predicted by
161
402000
2000
06:59
interaction or lack thereof with people unlike you, people of other races.
162
404000
4000
07:03
So if you want to address it,
163
408000
2000
07:05
the goal is to facilitate interaction with people of other races.
164
410000
3000
07:08
I have a couple of very obvious, I suppose,
165
413000
2000
07:10
ideas for maybe how to do that.
166
415000
3000
07:13
I'm a big fan of cities.
167
418000
2000
07:15
Especially if we have cites that are diverse and sustainable,
168
420000
3000
07:18
and can support people of different ethnicities and different income groups.
169
423000
3000
07:21
I think cities facilitate more of the kind of networking,
170
426000
3000
07:24
the kind of casual interaction than you might have on a daily basis.
171
429000
3000
07:27
But also not everyone wants to live in a city, certainly not a city like New York.
172
432000
3000
07:30
So we can think more about things like street grids.
173
435000
3000
07:33
This is the neighborhood where I grew up in East Lansing, Michigan.
174
438000
2000
07:35
It's a traditional Midwestern community, which means you have real grid.
175
440000
3000
07:38
You have real neighborhoods and real trees, and real streets you can walk on.
176
443000
3000
07:41
And you interact a lot with your neighbors --
177
446000
3000
07:44
people you like, people you might not know.
178
449000
2000
07:46
And as a result it's a very tolerant community,
179
451000
3000
07:49
which is different, I think, than something like this,
180
454000
2000
07:51
which is in Schaumburg, Illinois,
181
456000
2000
07:53
where every little set of houses has their own cul-de-sac
182
458000
3000
07:56
and drive-through Starbucks and stuff like that.
183
461000
2000
07:58
I think that actually this type of urban design,
184
463000
3000
08:01
which became more prevalent in the 1970s and 1980s --
185
466000
3000
08:04
I think there is a relationship between that and the country becoming
186
469000
3000
08:07
more conservative under Ronald Reagan.
187
472000
2000
08:09
But also here is another idea we have --
188
474000
3000
08:12
is an intercollegiate exchange program
189
477000
2000
08:14
where you have students going from New York abroad.
190
479000
3000
08:17
But frankly there are enough differences within the country now
191
482000
2000
08:19
where maybe you can take a bunch of kids from NYU,
192
484000
3000
08:22
have them go study for a semester at the University of Arkansas,
193
487000
2000
08:24
and vice versa. Do it at the high school level.
194
489000
3000
08:27
Literally there are people who might be in school in Arkansas or Tennessee
195
492000
3000
08:30
and might never interact in a positive affirmative way
196
495000
3000
08:33
with someone from another part of the country, or of another racial group.
197
498000
4000
08:37
I think part of the education variable we talked about before
198
502000
3000
08:40
is the networking experience you get when you go to college
199
505000
2000
08:42
where you do get a mix of people that you might not interact with otherwise.
200
507000
4000
08:46
But the point is, this is all good news,
201
511000
2000
08:48
because when something is predictable,
202
513000
3000
08:51
it is what I call designable.
203
516000
2000
08:53
You can start thinking about solutions to solving that problem,
204
518000
2000
08:55
even if the problem is pernicious and as intractable as racism.
205
520000
3000
08:58
If we understand the root causes of the behavior
206
523000
2000
09:00
and where it manifests itself and where it doesn't,
207
525000
2000
09:02
we can start to design solutions to it.
208
527000
3000
09:05
So that's all I have to say. Thank you very much.
209
530000
2000
09:07
(Applause)
210
532000
1000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Nate Silver - StatisticianMath whiz and baseball fan Nate Silver was mainly known for predicting outcomes in fantasy ballgames -- until his technique hit a home run calling the outcome of the 2008 election primaries.
Why you should listen
In the 2008 election season's closing weeks, throngs of wonks and laypeople alike were glued to FiveThirtyEight.com, a habitforming political blog. Red and blue bar charts crowded the scrollbars as the pulse of exit polls crept along the site's latest projections. It seemed almost miraculous: In a year of acute turns of favor, the site's owner and mouthpiece, Nate Silver (who blogged anonymously as "Poblano" until outing himself on May 30, 2008, as a baseball numberhead), managed to predict the winners of every U.S. Senate contest -- and the general Presidential election.
Besides being just-damn-fascinating, Silver's analysis is a decidedly contrarian gauntlet thrown before an unrepentant, spectacle-driven media. The up-and-coming pundit, who cut his teeth forecasting the performance of Major League Baseball players, has a fairly direct explanation of why most projections fail: "Polls are cherry-picked based on their brand name or shock value rather than their track record of accuracy."
Silver's considerable smarts are already helping local campaigns build constituencies and strategize. He is the author of The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail - but Some Don't.
Nate Silver | Speaker | TED.com