TEDGlobal 2010
Jason Clay: How big brands can help save biodiversity
Filmed:
Readability: 3.7
497,249 views
Convince just 100 key companies to go sustainable, and WWF's Jason Clay says global markets will shift to protect the planet our consumption has already outgrown. Hear how his extraordinary roundtables are getting big brand rivals to agree on green practices first -- before their products duke it out on store shelves.
Jason Clay - Market transformer
Jason Clay’s ideas are changing the way governments, foundations, researchers and NGOs identify and address risks and opportunities for their work. Full bio
Jason Clay’s ideas are changing the way governments, foundations, researchers and NGOs identify and address risks and opportunities for their work. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:16
I grew up on a small farm in Missouri.
0
1000
3000
00:19
We lived on less than a dollar a day
1
4000
2000
00:21
for about 15 years.
2
6000
2000
00:23
I got a scholarship, went to university,
3
8000
3000
00:26
studied international agriculture, studied anthropology,
4
11000
3000
00:29
and decided I was going to give back.
5
14000
2000
00:31
I was going to work with small farmers.
6
16000
2000
00:33
I was going to help alleviate poverty.
7
18000
2000
00:35
I was going to work on international development,
8
20000
3000
00:38
and then I took a turn
9
23000
3000
00:41
and ended up here.
10
26000
3000
00:44
Now, if you get a Ph.D., and you decide not to teach,
11
29000
2000
00:46
you don't always end up in a place like this.
12
31000
2000
00:48
It's a choice. You might end up driving a taxicab.
13
33000
3000
00:51
You could be in New York.
14
36000
3000
00:55
What I found was,
15
40000
2000
00:57
I started working with refugees and famine victims --
16
42000
3000
01:00
small farmers, all, or nearly all --
17
45000
3000
01:03
who had been dispossessed and displaced.
18
48000
3000
01:07
Now, what I'd been trained to do
19
52000
3000
01:10
was methodological research on such people.
20
55000
3000
01:13
So I did it: I found out how many women
21
58000
3000
01:16
had been raped en route to these camps.
22
61000
3000
01:19
I found out how many people had been put in jail,
23
64000
3000
01:22
how many family members had been killed.
24
67000
3000
01:25
I assessed how long they were going to stay
25
70000
2000
01:27
and how much it would take to feed them.
26
72000
2000
01:29
And I got really good at predicting
27
74000
2000
01:31
how many body bags you would need
28
76000
2000
01:33
for the people who were going to die in these camps.
29
78000
3000
01:36
Now this is God's work, but it's not my work.
30
81000
3000
01:39
It's not the work I set out to do.
31
84000
3000
01:45
So I was at a Grateful Dead benefit concert on the rainforests
32
90000
3000
01:48
in 1988.
33
93000
3000
01:51
I met a guy -- the guy on the left.
34
96000
3000
01:54
His name was Ben.
35
99000
2000
01:56
He said, "What can I do to save the rainforests?"
36
101000
2000
01:58
I said, "Well, Ben, what do you do?"
37
103000
2000
02:00
"I make ice cream."
38
105000
2000
02:02
So I said, "Well, you've got to make
39
107000
2000
02:04
a rainforest ice cream.
40
109000
2000
02:06
And you've got to use nuts from the rainforests
41
111000
2000
02:08
to show that forests are worth more as forests
42
113000
2000
02:10
than they are as pasture."
43
115000
3000
02:13
He said, "Okay."
44
118000
2000
02:15
Within a year,
45
120000
2000
02:17
Rainforest Crunch was on the shelves.
46
122000
2000
02:19
It was a great success.
47
124000
2000
02:21
We did our first million-dollars-worth of trade
48
126000
3000
02:24
by buying on 30 days and selling on 21.
49
129000
3000
02:27
That gets your adrenaline going.
50
132000
3000
02:30
Then we had a four and a half million-dollar line of credit
51
135000
2000
02:32
because we were credit-worthy at that point.
52
137000
3000
02:35
We had 15 to 20, maybe 22 percent
53
140000
2000
02:37
of the global Brazil-nut market.
54
142000
2000
02:39
We paid two to three times more than anybody else.
55
144000
3000
02:42
Everybody else raised their prices to the gatherers of Brazil nuts
56
147000
3000
02:45
because we would buy it otherwise.
57
150000
3000
02:49
A great success.
58
154000
2000
02:51
50 companies signed up, 200 products came out,
59
156000
3000
02:54
generated 100 million in sales.
60
159000
3000
02:59
It failed.
61
164000
2000
03:01
Why did it fail?
62
166000
2000
03:03
Because the people who were gathering Brazil nuts
63
168000
2000
03:05
weren't the same people who were cutting the forests.
64
170000
3000
03:08
And the people who made money from Brazil nuts
65
173000
3000
03:11
were not the people who made money from cutting the forests.
66
176000
3000
03:14
We were attacking the wrong driver.
67
179000
2000
03:16
We needed to be working on beef.
68
181000
2000
03:18
We needed to be working on lumber.
69
183000
2000
03:20
We needed to be working on soy --
70
185000
2000
03:22
things that we were not focused on.
71
187000
3000
03:25
So let's go back to Sudan.
72
190000
2000
03:27
I often talk to refugees:
73
192000
2000
03:29
"Why was it that the West didn't realize
74
194000
3000
03:32
that famines are caused by policies and politics,
75
197000
2000
03:34
not by weather?"
76
199000
2000
03:36
And this farmer said to me, one day,
77
201000
3000
03:39
something that was very profound.
78
204000
2000
03:41
He said, "You can't wake a person who's pretending to sleep."
79
206000
3000
03:44
(Laughter)
80
209000
2000
03:46
Okay. Fast forward.
81
211000
3000
03:49
We live on a planet.
82
214000
3000
03:52
There's just one of them.
83
217000
2000
03:54
We've got to wake up to the fact
84
219000
2000
03:56
that we don't have any more
85
221000
2000
03:58
and that this is a finite planet.
86
223000
2000
04:00
We know the limits of the resources we have.
87
225000
3000
04:03
We may be able to use them differently.
88
228000
2000
04:05
We may have some innovative, new ideas.
89
230000
2000
04:07
But in general, this is what we've got.
90
232000
2000
04:09
There's no more of it.
91
234000
3000
04:12
There's a basic equation that we can't get away from.
92
237000
3000
04:15
Population times consumption
93
240000
2000
04:17
has got to have some kind of relationship to the planet,
94
242000
3000
04:20
and right now, it's a simple "not equal."
95
245000
3000
04:24
Our work shows that we're living
96
249000
2000
04:26
at about 1.3 planets.
97
251000
2000
04:28
Since 1990,
98
253000
2000
04:30
we crossed the line
99
255000
2000
04:32
of being in a sustainable relationship to the planet.
100
257000
3000
04:35
Now we're at 1.3.
101
260000
2000
04:37
If we were farmers, we'd be eating our seed.
102
262000
3000
04:40
For bankers, we'd be living off the principal, not the interest.
103
265000
3000
04:43
This is where we stand today.
104
268000
3000
04:46
A lot of people like to point
105
271000
3000
04:49
to some place else as the cause of the problem.
106
274000
3000
04:52
It's always population growth.
107
277000
2000
04:54
Population growth's important,
108
279000
2000
04:56
but it's also about how much each person consumes.
109
281000
3000
05:00
So when the average American
110
285000
2000
05:02
consumes 43 times as much
111
287000
3000
05:05
as the average African,
112
290000
3000
05:08
we've got to think that consumption is an issue.
113
293000
2000
05:10
It's not just about population,
114
295000
2000
05:12
and it's not just about them; it's about us.
115
297000
3000
05:16
But it's not just about people;
116
301000
2000
05:18
it's about lifestyles.
117
303000
2000
05:20
There's very good evidence --
118
305000
2000
05:22
again, we don't necessarily have
119
307000
2000
05:24
a peer-reviewed methodology
120
309000
2000
05:26
that's bulletproof yet --
121
311000
2000
05:28
but there's very good evidence
122
313000
2000
05:30
that the average cat in Europe
123
315000
2000
05:32
has a larger environmental footprint in its lifetime
124
317000
3000
05:35
than the average African.
125
320000
3000
05:38
You think that's not an issue going forward?
126
323000
3000
05:41
You think that's not a question
127
326000
2000
05:43
as to how we should be using the Earth's resources?
128
328000
3000
05:46
Let's go back and visit our equation.
129
331000
2000
05:48
In 2000, we had six billion people on the planet.
130
333000
3000
05:51
They were consuming what they were consuming --
131
336000
2000
05:53
let's say one unit of consumption each.
132
338000
2000
05:55
We have six billion units of consumption.
133
340000
3000
05:58
By 2050,
134
343000
2000
06:00
we're going to have nine billion people -- all the scientists agree.
135
345000
3000
06:03
They're all going to consume twice as much as they currently do --
136
348000
3000
06:06
scientists, again, agree --
137
351000
2000
06:08
because income is going to grow in developing countries
138
353000
3000
06:11
five times what it is today --
139
356000
2000
06:13
on global average, about [2.9].
140
358000
2000
06:15
So we're going to have 18 billion units of consumption.
141
360000
3000
06:19
Who have you heard talking lately
142
364000
3000
06:22
that's said we have to triple production
143
367000
2000
06:24
of goods and services?
144
369000
2000
06:26
But that's what the math says.
145
371000
2000
06:28
We're not going to be able to do that.
146
373000
2000
06:30
We can get productivity up.
147
375000
2000
06:32
We can get efficiency up.
148
377000
2000
06:34
But we've also got to get consumption down.
149
379000
3000
06:38
We need to use less
150
383000
2000
06:40
to make more.
151
385000
2000
06:42
And then we need to use less again.
152
387000
2000
06:44
And then we need to consume less.
153
389000
2000
06:46
All of those things are part of that equation.
154
391000
3000
06:49
But it basically raises a fundamental question:
155
394000
3000
06:52
should consumers have a choice
156
397000
2000
06:54
about sustainability, about sustainable products?
157
399000
3000
06:57
Should you be able to buy a product that's sustainable
158
402000
2000
06:59
sitting next to one that isn't,
159
404000
2000
07:01
or should all the products on the shelf be sustainable?
160
406000
3000
07:06
If they should all be sustainable on a finite planet,
161
411000
3000
07:09
how do you make that happen?
162
414000
3000
07:12
The average consumer takes 1.8 seconds in the U.S.
163
417000
2000
07:14
Okay, so let's be generous.
164
419000
2000
07:16
Let's say it's 3.5 seconds in Europe.
165
421000
3000
07:19
How do you evaluate all the scientific data
166
424000
3000
07:22
around a product,
167
427000
2000
07:24
the data that's changing on a weekly, if not a daily, basis?
168
429000
3000
07:27
How do you get informed?
169
432000
2000
07:29
You don't.
170
434000
2000
07:33
Here's a little question.
171
438000
2000
07:35
From a greenhouse gas perspective,
172
440000
2000
07:37
is lamb produced in the U.K.
173
442000
3000
07:40
better than lamb produced in New Zealand,
174
445000
2000
07:42
frozen and shipped to the U.K.?
175
447000
3000
07:45
Is a bad feeder lot operation for beef
176
450000
3000
07:48
better or worse than
177
453000
3000
07:51
a bad grazing operation for beef?
178
456000
2000
07:53
Do organic potatoes
179
458000
2000
07:55
actually have fewer toxic chemicals
180
460000
2000
07:57
used to produce them
181
462000
2000
07:59
than conventional potatoes?
182
464000
2000
08:01
In every single case,
183
466000
2000
08:03
the answer is "it depends."
184
468000
2000
08:05
It depends on who produced it and how,
185
470000
3000
08:08
in every single instance.
186
473000
2000
08:10
And there are many others.
187
475000
2000
08:12
How is a consumer going to walk through this minefield?
188
477000
2000
08:14
They're not.
189
479000
2000
08:16
They may have a lot of opinions about it,
190
481000
2000
08:18
but they're not going to be terribly informed.
191
483000
3000
08:21
Sustainability has got to be a pre-competitive issue.
192
486000
3000
08:24
It's got to be something we all care about.
193
489000
3000
08:29
And we need collusion.
194
494000
2000
08:31
We need groups to work together that never have.
195
496000
3000
08:34
We need Cargill to work with Bunge.
196
499000
3000
08:37
We need Coke to work with Pepsi.
197
502000
3000
08:40
We need Oxford to work with Cambridge.
198
505000
2000
08:42
We need Greenpeace to work with WWF.
199
507000
2000
08:44
Everybody's got to work together --
200
509000
2000
08:46
China and the U.S.
201
511000
2000
08:48
We need to begin to manage this planet
202
513000
2000
08:50
as if our life depended on it,
203
515000
2000
08:52
because it does,
204
517000
2000
08:54
it fundamentally does.
205
519000
2000
08:56
But we can't do everything.
206
521000
2000
08:58
Even if we get everybody working on it,
207
523000
2000
09:00
we've got to be strategic.
208
525000
2000
09:02
We need to focus on the where,
209
527000
2000
09:04
the what and the who.
210
529000
2000
09:06
So, the where:
211
531000
2000
09:08
We've identified 35 places globally that we need to work.
212
533000
2000
09:10
These are the places that are the richest in biodiversity
213
535000
3000
09:13
and the most important from an ecosystem function point-of-view.
214
538000
3000
09:16
We have to work in these places.
215
541000
2000
09:18
We have to save these places if we want a chance in hell
216
543000
3000
09:21
of preserving biodiversity as we know it.
217
546000
3000
09:26
We looked at the threats to these places.
218
551000
2000
09:28
These are the 15 commodities
219
553000
2000
09:30
that fundamentally pose the biggest threats
220
555000
2000
09:32
to these places
221
557000
2000
09:34
because of deforestation,
222
559000
2000
09:36
soil loss, water use, pesticide use,
223
561000
3000
09:39
over-fishing, etc.
224
564000
3000
09:44
So we've got 35 places,
225
569000
3000
09:47
we've got 15 priority commodities,
226
572000
2000
09:49
who do we work with
227
574000
2000
09:51
to change the way those commodities are produced?
228
576000
3000
09:54
Are we going to work with 6.9 billion consumers?
229
579000
3000
09:58
Let's see, that's about 7,000 languages,
230
583000
3000
10:01
350 major languages --
231
586000
2000
10:03
a lot of work there.
232
588000
2000
10:05
I don't see anybody actually being able
233
590000
2000
10:07
to do that very effectively.
234
592000
2000
10:09
Are we going to work with 1.5 billion producers?
235
594000
3000
10:13
Again, a daunting task.
236
598000
3000
10:16
There must be a better way.
237
601000
3000
10:19
300 to 500 companies
238
604000
2000
10:21
control 70 percent or more
239
606000
2000
10:23
of the trade of each of the 15 commodities
240
608000
3000
10:26
that we've identified as the most significant.
241
611000
3000
10:29
If we work with those, if we change those companies
242
614000
3000
10:32
and the way they do business,
243
617000
2000
10:34
then the rest will happen automatically.
244
619000
3000
10:38
So, we went through our 15 commodities.
245
623000
2000
10:40
This is nine of them.
246
625000
2000
10:42
We lined them up side-by-side,
247
627000
2000
10:44
and we put the names of the companies that work
248
629000
2000
10:46
on each of those.
249
631000
3000
10:49
And if you go through the first 25 or 30 names
250
634000
2000
10:51
of each of the commodities,
251
636000
2000
10:53
what you begin to see is,
252
638000
2000
10:55
gosh, there's Cargill here, there's Cargill there,
253
640000
3000
10:58
there's Cargill everywhere.
254
643000
2000
11:00
In fact, these names start coming up over and over again.
255
645000
3000
11:03
So we did the analysis again a slightly different way.
256
648000
3000
11:07
We said: if we take the top hundred companies,
257
652000
3000
11:10
what percentage
258
655000
2000
11:12
of all 15 commodities
259
657000
3000
11:15
do they touch, buy or sell?
260
660000
3000
11:18
And what we found is it's 25 percent.
261
663000
3000
11:22
So 100 companies
262
667000
2000
11:24
control 25 percent of the trade
263
669000
3000
11:27
of all 15 of the most significant
264
672000
2000
11:29
commodities on the planet.
265
674000
3000
11:32
We can get our arms around a hundred companies.
266
677000
3000
11:35
A hundred companies, we can work with.
267
680000
3000
11:38
Why is 25 percent important?
268
683000
3000
11:41
Because if these companies demand sustainable products,
269
686000
3000
11:44
they'll pull 40 to 50 percent of production.
270
689000
3000
11:48
Companies can push producers
271
693000
3000
11:51
faster than consumers can.
272
696000
3000
11:54
By companies asking for this,
273
699000
2000
11:56
we can leverage production so much faster
274
701000
3000
11:59
than by waiting for consumers to do it.
275
704000
2000
12:01
After 40 years, the global organic movement
276
706000
3000
12:04
has achieved 0.7 of one percent
277
709000
2000
12:06
of global food.
278
711000
2000
12:08
We can't wait that long.
279
713000
2000
12:10
We don't have that kind of time.
280
715000
2000
12:12
We need change
281
717000
2000
12:14
that's going to accelerate.
282
719000
3000
12:17
Even working with individual companies
283
722000
2000
12:19
is not probably going to get us there.
284
724000
2000
12:21
We need to begin to work with industries.
285
726000
3000
12:24
So we've started roundtables
286
729000
2000
12:26
where we bring together the entire value chain,
287
731000
2000
12:28
from producers
288
733000
2000
12:30
all the way to the retailers and brands.
289
735000
2000
12:32
We bring in civil society, we bring in NGOs,
290
737000
2000
12:34
we bring in researchers and scientists
291
739000
2000
12:36
to have an informed discussion --
292
741000
2000
12:38
sometimes a battle royale --
293
743000
2000
12:40
to figure out what are the key impacts
294
745000
3000
12:43
of these products,
295
748000
2000
12:45
what is a global benchmark,
296
750000
1000
12:46
what's an acceptable impact,
297
751000
2000
12:48
and design standards around that.
298
753000
3000
12:52
It's not all fun and games.
299
757000
3000
12:56
In salmon aquaculture,
300
761000
2000
12:58
we kicked off a roundtable
301
763000
2000
13:00
almost six years ago.
302
765000
2000
13:02
Eight entities came to the table.
303
767000
3000
13:05
We eventually got, I think, 60 percent
304
770000
2000
13:07
of global production at the table
305
772000
2000
13:09
and 25 percent of demand at the table.
306
774000
3000
13:12
Three of the original eight entities were suing each other.
307
777000
3000
13:15
And yet, next week, we launch
308
780000
3000
13:18
globally verified, vetted and certified
309
783000
3000
13:21
standards for salmon aquaculture.
310
786000
3000
13:24
It can happen.
311
789000
2000
13:26
(Applause)
312
791000
7000
13:33
So what brings
313
798000
3000
13:36
the different entities to the table?
314
801000
3000
13:40
It's risk and demand.
315
805000
2000
13:42
For the big companies, it's reputational risk,
316
807000
2000
13:44
but more importantly,
317
809000
2000
13:46
they don't care what the price of commodities is.
318
811000
2000
13:48
If they don't have commodities, they don't have a business.
319
813000
3000
13:51
They care about availability,
320
816000
2000
13:53
so the big risk for them is not having product at all.
321
818000
3000
13:56
For the producers,
322
821000
2000
13:58
if a buyer wants to buy something produced a certain way,
323
823000
3000
14:01
that's what brings them to the table.
324
826000
2000
14:03
So it's the demand that brings them to the table.
325
828000
3000
14:06
The good news is
326
831000
2000
14:08
we identified a hundred companies two years ago.
327
833000
2000
14:10
In the last 18 months, we've signed agreements
328
835000
2000
14:12
with 40 of those hundred companies
329
837000
2000
14:14
to begin to work with them on their supply chain.
330
839000
2000
14:16
And in the next 18 months,
331
841000
3000
14:19
we will have signed up to work with another 40,
332
844000
3000
14:22
and we think we'll get those signed as well.
333
847000
2000
14:24
Now what we're doing is bringing the CEOs
334
849000
2000
14:26
of these 80 companies together
335
851000
2000
14:28
to help twist the arms of the final 20,
336
853000
3000
14:31
to bring them to the table,
337
856000
2000
14:33
because they don't like NGOs, they've never worked with NGOs,
338
858000
3000
14:36
they're concerned about this, they're concerned about that,
339
861000
2000
14:38
but we all need to be in this together.
340
863000
2000
14:40
So we're pulling out all the stops.
341
865000
2000
14:42
We're using whatever leverage we have to bring them to the table.
342
867000
3000
14:46
One company we're working with that's begun --
343
871000
2000
14:48
in baby steps, perhaps --
344
873000
2000
14:50
but has begun this journey on sustainability is Cargill.
345
875000
3000
14:53
They've funded research that shows
346
878000
3000
14:56
that we can double global palm oil production
347
881000
2000
14:58
without cutting a single tree in the next 20 years,
348
883000
3000
15:01
and do it all in Borneo alone
349
886000
2000
15:03
by planting on land that's already degraded.
350
888000
2000
15:05
The study shows that the highest net present value
351
890000
3000
15:08
for palm oil
352
893000
2000
15:10
is on land that's been degraded.
353
895000
3000
15:13
They're also undertaking a study to look at
354
898000
2000
15:15
all of their supplies of palm oil
355
900000
3000
15:18
to see if they could be certified
356
903000
2000
15:20
and what they would need to change in order to become third-party certified
357
905000
3000
15:23
under a credible certification program.
358
908000
3000
15:27
Why is Cargill important?
359
912000
2000
15:29
Because Cargill has 20 to 25 percent
360
914000
2000
15:31
of global palm oil.
361
916000
2000
15:33
If Cargill makes a decision,
362
918000
2000
15:35
the entire palm oil industry moves,
363
920000
3000
15:38
or at least 40 or 50 percent of it.
364
923000
2000
15:40
That's not insignificant.
365
925000
2000
15:42
More importantly, Cargill and one other company
366
927000
2000
15:44
ship 50 percent of the palm oil
367
929000
3000
15:47
that goes to China.
368
932000
2000
15:49
We don't have to change the way
369
934000
2000
15:51
a single Chinese company works
370
936000
2000
15:53
if we get Cargill to only send
371
938000
2000
15:55
sustainable palm oil to China.
372
940000
3000
15:58
It's a pre-competitive issue.
373
943000
2000
16:00
All the palm oil going there is good.
374
945000
2000
16:02
Buy it.
375
947000
2000
16:04
Mars is also on a similar journey.
376
949000
3000
16:07
Now most people understand that Mars is a chocolate company,
377
952000
3000
16:10
but Mars has made sustainability pledges
378
955000
2000
16:12
to buy only certified product for all of its seafood.
379
957000
3000
16:15
It turns out Mars buys more seafood than Walmart
380
960000
2000
16:17
because of pet food.
381
962000
2000
16:19
But they're doing some really interesting things around chocolate,
382
964000
3000
16:22
and it all comes from the fact
383
967000
2000
16:24
that Mars wants to be in business in the future.
384
969000
3000
16:27
And what they see is that they need to
385
972000
2000
16:29
improve chocolate production.
386
974000
3000
16:32
On any given plantation,
387
977000
2000
16:34
20 percent of the trees produce 80 percent of the crop,
388
979000
3000
16:37
so Mars is looking at the genome,
389
982000
2000
16:39
they're sequencing the genome of the cocoa plant.
390
984000
2000
16:41
They're doing it with IBM and the USDA,
391
986000
2000
16:43
and they're putting it in the public domain
392
988000
2000
16:45
because they want everybody to have access to this data,
393
990000
3000
16:48
because they want everybody to help them
394
993000
2000
16:50
make cocoa more productive and more sustainable.
395
995000
3000
16:53
What they've realized
396
998000
2000
16:55
is that if they can identify the traits
397
1000000
2000
16:57
on productivity and drought tolerance,
398
1002000
3000
17:00
they can produce 320 percent as much cocoa
399
1005000
3000
17:03
on 40 percent of the land.
400
1008000
3000
17:06
The rest of the land can be used for something else.
401
1011000
3000
17:09
It's more with less and less again.
402
1014000
3000
17:12
That's what the future has got to be,
403
1017000
2000
17:14
and putting it in the public domain is smart.
404
1019000
3000
17:17
They don't want to be an I.P. company; they want to be a chocolate company,
405
1022000
3000
17:20
but they want to be a chocolate company forever.
406
1025000
3000
17:23
Now, the price of food, many people complain about,
407
1028000
3000
17:26
but in fact, the price of food is going down,
408
1031000
3000
17:29
and that's odd because in fact,
409
1034000
2000
17:31
consumers are not paying for the true cost of food.
410
1036000
3000
17:34
If you take a look just at water,
411
1039000
2000
17:36
what we see is that,
412
1041000
2000
17:38
with four very common products,
413
1043000
3000
17:41
you look at how much a farmer produced to make those products,
414
1046000
3000
17:44
and then you look at how much water input was put into them,
415
1049000
3000
17:47
and then you look at what the farmer was paid.
416
1052000
3000
17:50
If you divide the amount of water
417
1055000
2000
17:52
into what the farmer was paid,
418
1057000
2000
17:54
the farmer didn't receive enough money
419
1059000
2000
17:56
to pay a decent price for water in any of those commodities.
420
1061000
3000
17:59
That is an externality by definition.
421
1064000
2000
18:01
This is the subsidy from nature.
422
1066000
2000
18:03
Coca-Cola, they've worked a lot on water,
423
1068000
3000
18:06
but right now, they're entering into 17-year contracts
424
1071000
3000
18:09
with growers in Turkey
425
1074000
2000
18:11
to sell juice into Europe,
426
1076000
2000
18:13
and they're doing that because they want to have a product
427
1078000
3000
18:16
that's closer to the European market.
428
1081000
2000
18:18
But they're not just buying the juice;
429
1083000
2000
18:20
they're also buying the carbon in the trees
430
1085000
3000
18:23
to offset the shipment costs associated with carbon
431
1088000
2000
18:25
to get the product into Europe.
432
1090000
3000
18:28
There's carbon that's being bought with sugar,
433
1093000
3000
18:31
with coffee, with beef.
434
1096000
2000
18:33
This is called bundling. It's bringing those externalities
435
1098000
2000
18:35
back into the price of the commodity.
436
1100000
3000
18:39
We need to take what we've learned in private, voluntary standards
437
1104000
3000
18:42
of what the best producers in the world are doing
438
1107000
3000
18:45
and use that to inform government regulation,
439
1110000
3000
18:48
so we can shift the entire performance curve.
440
1113000
3000
18:51
We can't just focus on identifying the best;
441
1116000
2000
18:53
we've got to move the rest.
442
1118000
3000
18:56
The issue isn't what to think, it's how to think.
443
1121000
3000
18:59
These companies have begun to think differently.
444
1124000
2000
19:01
They're on a journey; there's no turning back.
445
1126000
3000
19:04
We're all on that same journey with them.
446
1129000
3000
19:07
We have to really begin to change
447
1132000
3000
19:10
the way we think about everything.
448
1135000
2000
19:12
Whatever was sustainable on a planet of six billion
449
1137000
3000
19:15
is not going to be sustainable on a planet with nine.
450
1140000
3000
19:18
Thank you.
451
1143000
2000
19:20
(Applause)
452
1145000
3000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Jason Clay - Market transformerJason Clay’s ideas are changing the way governments, foundations, researchers and NGOs identify and address risks and opportunities for their work.
Why you should listen
A senior vice president in charge of markets at the World Wildlife Fund (WWF-US), Clay's goal is to create global standards for producing and using raw materials, particularly in terms of carbon and water. He has convened roundtables of retailers, buyers, producers and environmentalists to reduce the impacts of producing a range of goods and to encourage environmentally sensitive practices in agriculture, aquaculture and industry. He thinks deeply about the evolving role of the NGOs in the 21st century, using venture philanthropy to make them more nimble and operating at the speed and scale of life on the planet today. Before joining WWF in 1999, Clay ran a family farm, taught at Harvard and Yale, worked at the US Department of Agriculture and spent more than 25 years working with NGOs.
Jason Clay | Speaker | TED.com