TED in the Field
Craig Venter: Watch me unveil "synthetic life"
克萊格‧溫特爾揭開「合成生命」的面紗
Filmed:
Readability: 5
1,297,241 views
克萊格‧溫特爾及其研究團隊宣佈了歷史性的生物進展：他們創造出第一個由合成DNA控制、能自行複製、功能完整的細胞。他在此宣佈中說明了他們如何達到這個地步，以及為什麼這項成就標示了一個科學新時代的來臨。
Craig Venter - Biologist, genetics pioneer
In 2001, Craig Venter made headlines for sequencing the human genome. In 2003, he started mapping the ocean's biodiversity. And now he's created the first synthetic lifeforms -- microorganisms that can produce alternative fuels. Full bio
In 2001, Craig Venter made headlines for sequencing the human genome. In 2003, he started mapping the ocean's biodiversity. And now he's created the first synthetic lifeforms -- microorganisms that can produce alternative fuels. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:16
We're here today to announce
0
1000
2000
我們今天在此宣佈
00:18
the first synthetic cell,
1
3000
3000
第一個合成細胞製作成功
00:21
a cell made by
2
6000
2000
這細胞我們先以數碼的方式
00:23
starting with the digital code in the computer,
3
8000
3000
在電腦裡建構
00:26
building the chromosome
4
11000
3000
再從四瓶化學物質
00:29
from four bottles of chemicals,
5
14000
3000
築出染色體
00:32
assembling that chromosome in yeast,
6
17000
2000
並在酵母中組合該細胞的染色體
00:34
transplanting it into
7
19000
3000
然後再把它移植到
00:37
a recipient bacterial cell
8
22000
2000
接收的細菌細胞裡
00:39
and transforming that cell
9
24000
2000
使那個細胞轉化
00:41
into a new bacterial species.
10
26000
2000
成為一個新的菌種
00:44
So this is the first self-replicating species
11
29000
3000
於是成為我們這個地球上
00:47
that we've had on the planet
12
32000
2000
第一個誕生於電腦
00:49
whose parent is a computer.
13
34000
3000
而能自我複製的物種
00:52
It also is the first species
14
37000
2000
它也將是第一個
00:54
to have its own website
15
39000
2000
把自己的網址寫入
00:56
encoded in its genetic code.
16
41000
3000
自己的基因密碼裡的物種
00:59
But we'll talk more about
17
44000
2000
不過我們稍後
01:01
the watermarks in a minute.
18
46000
3000
再多談浮水印之事
01:04
This is a project that had its inception
19
49000
2000
這個研究專案肇始於
01:06
15 years ago
20
51000
2000
15年前
01:08
when our team then --
21
53000
2000
當時我們的研究團隊－
01:10
we called the institute TIGR --
22
55000
2000
稱為TIGR研究所－
01:12
was involved in sequencing
23
57000
2000
進行了有史以來首次的
01:14
the first two genomes in history.
24
59000
2000
兩個基因組排序工作
01:16
We did Haemophilus influenzae
25
61000
2000
我們先為流感嗜血桿菌
01:18
and then the smallest genome of a self-replicating organism,
26
63000
3000
然後又為能自行複製的生物體
01:21
that of Mycoplasma genitalium.
27
66000
3000
生殖支原體的最小基因組做了排序
01:24
And as soon as
28
69000
2000
我們一旦有了
01:26
we had these two sequences
29
71000
2000
這兩個排序
01:28
we thought, if this is supposed to be the smallest genome
30
73000
3000
我們想, 如果這被認為是能自行複製的
01:31
of a self-replicating species,
31
76000
2000
物種的最小基因組
01:33
could there be even a smaller genome?
32
78000
2000
那麼還有更小的嗎？
01:35
Could we understand the basis of cellular life
33
80000
3000
我們能在基因的層面上理解
01:38
at the genetic level?
34
83000
2000
細胞生命的基礎嗎？
01:40
It's been a 15-year quest
35
85000
2000
這一問就是15年
01:42
just to get to the starting point now
36
87000
2000
今天我們才剛走到開始
01:44
to be able to answer those questions,
37
89000
3000
可以回答那些問題的地步
01:47
because it's very difficult to eliminate
38
92000
2000
由於很難消除細胞裡的
01:49
multiple genes from a cell.
39
94000
2000
多重基因
01:51
You can only do them one at a time.
40
96000
3000
只能一次消除一個
01:54
We decided early on
41
99000
2000
所以我們很早就決定
01:56
that we had to take a synthetic route,
42
101000
2000
即使以前沒有人做過
01:58
even though nobody had been there before,
43
103000
2000
我們必須採取合成的辦法
02:00
to see if we could synthesize
44
105000
2000
看看我們能否合成
02:02
a bacterial chromosome
45
107000
2000
一個細菌的染色體
02:04
so we could actually vary the gene content
46
109000
2000
由此我們改變了基因內容
02:06
to understand the essential genes for life.
47
111000
3000
以便理解生命的基本基因
02:09
That started our 15-year quest
48
114000
3000
於是開始了我們15年的探索
02:12
to get here.
49
117000
2000
終於達到今天的地步
02:14
But before we did the first experiments,
50
119000
2000
開始進行首先的實驗之前
02:16
we actually asked
51
121000
3000
我們確實先向當時在賓州大學的
02:19
Art Caplan's team at the University of Pennsylvania
52
124000
3000
Art Caplan研究團隊尋求
02:22
to undertake a review
53
127000
2000
進行評估審查
02:24
of what the risks, the challenges,
54
129000
3000
以確定在實驗室裡創造
02:27
the ethics around creating new
55
132000
2000
新物種的風險、挑戰
02:29
species in the laboratory were
56
134000
2000
和道德方面的問題
02:31
because it hadn't been done before.
57
136000
2000
因為這是史無前例的
02:33
They spent about two years
58
138000
2000
他們花了大約兩年時間
02:35
reviewing that independently
59
140000
2000
獨立完成評審
02:37
and published their results in Science in 1999.
60
142000
3000
將其結果發表於1999年《科學雜誌》
02:40
Ham and I took two years off
61
145000
2000
當時我和Ham離開兩年
02:42
as a side project to sequence the human genome,
62
147000
2000
進行人類基因組排序的另一個研究專案
02:44
but as soon as that was done
63
149000
2000
完成工作後
02:46
we got back to the task at hand.
64
151000
3000
我們立即回到這個工作
02:50
In 2002, we started
65
155000
2000
2002年, 我們開始
02:52
a new institute,
66
157000
2000
一個新的研究所
02:54
the Institute for Biological Energy Alternatives,
67
159000
3000
生物能源替代方案研究所
02:57
where we set out two goals:
68
162000
2000
我們設定了兩個目標
02:59
One, to understand
69
164000
2000
其一是要理解
03:01
the impact of our technology on the environment,
70
166000
3000
我們的科技對環境的影響並確定
03:04
and how to understand the environment better,
71
169000
2000
如何更妥善理解環境問題
03:06
and two, to start down this process
72
171000
2000
其二是開始建構
03:08
of making synthetic life
73
173000
3000
製作合成生命的過程
03:11
to understand basic life.
74
176000
3000
以便理解基礎生命
03:14
In 2003,
75
179000
2000
在2003年
03:16
we published our first success.
76
181000
2000
我們發表了初步的成果
03:18
So Ham Smith and Clyde Hutchison
77
183000
2000
Ham Smith和Clyde Hutchison
03:20
developed some new methods
78
185000
2000
開發了一些新的方法
03:22
for making error-free DNA
79
187000
3000
用來小規模製作
03:25
at a small level.
80
190000
2000
無差錯的DNA
03:27
Our first task was
81
192000
2000
當時的第一個工作是
03:29
a 5,000-letter code bacteriophage,
82
194000
3000
一個5000字母代碼的噬菌體
03:32
a virus that attacks only E. coli.
83
197000
3000
是一種只會攻擊大腸桿菌的病毒
03:36
So that was
84
201000
2000
那就是編號
03:38
the phage phi X 174,
85
203000
2000
ΦX174的噬菌體
03:40
which was chosen for historical reasons.
86
205000
2000
選擇它有歷史的緣由
03:42
It was the first DNA phage,
87
207000
3000
它是第一個真正受到完整
03:45
DNA virus, DNA genome
88
210000
3000
排序的DNA噬菌體、DNA病毒、
03:48
that was actually sequenced.
89
213000
2000
DNA基因組
03:50
So once we realized
90
215000
3000
那麼我們一旦明白
03:53
that we could make 5,000-base pair
91
218000
2000
我們能製作出5000個在
03:55
viral-sized pieces,
92
220000
2000
病毒般大小內的核酸鹼基對
03:57
we thought, we at least have the means
93
222000
2000
我們想，我們至少有了方法
03:59
then to try and make serially lots of these pieces
94
224000
3000
進一步嘗試批量製作這些配對
04:02
to be able to eventually assemble them together
95
227000
3000
以便在最後把它們組合起來
04:05
to make this mega base chromosome.
96
230000
3000
製作成這個兆基的染色體
04:09
So, substantially larger than
97
234000
2000
這個進展基本上甚至
04:11
we even thought we would go initially.
98
236000
3000
比我們原先所想要組合的還大出許多
04:15
There were several steps to this. There were two sides:
99
240000
3000
達到這個地步有幾個步驟，分兩方面來說
04:18
We had to solve the chemistry
100
243000
2000
我們必須在化學方面解決
04:20
for making large DNA molecules,
101
245000
2000
製作大型DNA分子的問題
04:22
and we had to solve the biological side
102
247000
2000
另外在生物學方面我們必須解決
04:24
of how, if we had this new chemical entity,
103
249000
3000
有了這個新的化學實體之後
04:27
how would we boot it up, activate it
104
252000
3000
如何在一個接收細胞裡
04:30
in a recipient cell.
105
255000
3000
將它啟動、將它活化的問題
04:33
We had two teams working in parallel:
106
258000
2000
因此我們有兩個團隊併列進行
04:35
one team on the chemistry,
107
260000
2000
一個團隊處理化學的問題
04:37
and the other on trying to
108
262000
3000
另一個團隊嘗試
04:40
be able to transplant
109
265000
2000
如何能夠移植
04:42
entire chromosomes
110
267000
2000
整個染色體
04:44
to get new cells.
111
269000
3000
以獲得新的細胞
04:47
When we started this out, we thought the synthesis would be the biggest problem,
112
272000
3000
開始時我們以為最大的問題會在於合成
04:50
which is why we chose the smallest genome.
113
275000
3000
那是我們當時選擇最小的基因組的原因
04:53
And some of you have noticed that we switched from the smallest genome
114
278000
3000
各位有人注意到我們改用相當大的基因組
04:56
to a much larger one.
115
281000
2000
而沒有採用最小的
04:58
And we can walk through the reasons for that,
116
283000
2000
我們可以略過這個改動的原因
05:00
but basically the small cell
117
285000
3000
不過基本上, 採用小型的細胞
05:03
took on the order of
118
288000
2000
要得到結果
05:05
one to two months to get results from,
119
290000
3000
需要花費一到兩個月時間
05:08
whereas the larger, faster-growing cell
120
293000
2000
但若採用較大、成長較快的細胞
05:10
takes only two days.
121
295000
2000
只需要兩天
05:12
So there's only so many cycles we could go through
122
297000
3000
因此我們在一年內
05:15
in a year at six weeks per cycle.
123
300000
3000
以六週為一期，只能進行那麼多週期
05:18
And you should know that basically
124
303000
2000
而且各位應該知道
05:20
99, probably 99 percent plus
125
305000
3000
基本上我們的實驗有99%
05:23
of our experiments failed.
126
308000
2000
甚至可能99%以上會是失敗的
05:25
So this was a debugging,
127
310000
2000
因此整個工作從一開始
05:27
problem-solving scenario from the beginning
128
312000
3000
就是糾錯, 解決問題的戲碼
05:30
because there was no recipe
129
315000
2000
因為當時還沒有
05:32
of how to get there.
130
317000
2000
達到成功的訣竅
05:34
So, one of the most important publications we had
131
319000
3000
我們最重要的發表之一
05:37
was in 2007.
132
322000
2000
是在2007年
05:39
Carole Lartigue led the effort
133
324000
3000
Carole Lartigue主持的那個研究
05:42
to actually transplant a bacterial chromosome
134
327000
3000
說明如何將細菌染色體
05:45
from one bacteria to another.
135
330000
2000
從一個細菌移植到另一個
05:47
I think philosophically, that was one of the most important papers
136
332000
3000
哲學意義上，我認為那是我們做過的研究中
05:50
that we've ever done
137
335000
2000
最為重要的報告之一
05:52
because it showed how dynamic life was.
138
337000
3000
因為該報告顯示了生命具有多大的動能
05:55
And we knew, once that worked,
139
340000
2000
我們知道, 只要這方法奏效
05:57
that we actually had a chance
140
342000
2000
那麼我們很有可能
05:59
if we could make the synthetic chromosomes
141
344000
2000
做到讓合成的染色體
06:01
to do the same with those.
142
346000
3000
同樣能夠移植到細菌細胞裡
06:04
We didn't know that it was going to take us
143
349000
2000
只是當時還不知道還要
06:06
several years more to get there.
144
351000
2000
多少年才能做到那個地步
06:08
In 2008,
145
353000
2000
2008年
06:10
we reported the complete synthesis
146
355000
2000
我們發表了完成合成
06:12
of the Mycoplasma genitalium genome,
147
357000
3000
生殖支原體基因組的報告
06:15
a little over 500,000 letters of genetic code,
148
360000
3000
比500,000字母稍多一點的基因密碼
06:19
but we have not yet succeeded in booting up that chromosome.
149
364000
3000
但是我們還未成功地啟動該染色體
06:22
We think in part, because of its slow growth
150
367000
3000
我們認為部分原因是由於成長緩慢
06:26
and, in part,
151
371000
2000
另外部分原因是
06:28
cells have all kinds of unique defense mechanisms
152
373000
3000
細胞都具有各種特殊的防衛機制
06:31
to keep these events from happening.
153
376000
2000
使得啟動植入困難
06:33
It turned out the cell that we were trying to transplant into
154
378000
3000
我們發現我們嘗試植入的細胞
06:36
had a nuclease, an enzyme that chews up DNA on its surface,
155
381000
3000
有一種會在其表面啃蝕DNA的核酸酵素
06:39
and was happy to eat
156
384000
2000
吃起我們給它的合成DNA
06:41
the synthetic DNA that we gave it
157
386000
2000
特別痛快
06:43
and never got transplantations.
158
388000
3000
因此移植一直沒有成功
06:46
But at the time, that was the largest
159
391000
2000
不過那是我們當時
06:48
molecule of a defined structure
160
393000
2000
所知做過的分子結構
06:50
that had been made.
161
395000
2000
最大的一個
06:52
And so both sides were progressing,
162
397000
2000
因此兩方面當時都在進展之中
06:54
but part of the synthesis
163
399000
2000
但合成有部分必須完成
06:56
had to be accomplished or was able to be accomplished
164
401000
3000
或說仍須完成
06:59
using yeast, putting the fragments in yeast
165
404000
3000
使用酵母－把片段放入酵母中
07:02
and yeast would assemble these for us.
166
407000
2000
酵母就會幫我們組合
07:04
It's an amazing step forward,
167
409000
3000
這是令人驚訝的進步
07:07
but we had a problem because now we had
168
412000
2000
但是我們卻有了新的問題
07:09
the bacterial chromosomes growing in yeast.
169
414000
3000
因為我們的細菌染色體現在是在酵母中成長的
07:12
So in addition to doing the transplant,
170
417000
3000
因此除了要進行移植之外
07:15
we had to find out how to get a bacterial chromosome
171
420000
2000
我們還得找出一個方法從真核酵母中
07:17
out of the eukaryotic yeast
172
422000
2000
取出細菌染色體
07:19
into a form where we could transplant it
173
424000
2000
而且要確保取出後
07:21
into a recipient cell.
174
426000
3000
能被移植到一個接收細胞裡
07:25
So our team developed new techniques
175
430000
3000
因此我們的研究團隊開發了一個新技術
07:28
for actually growing, cloning
176
433000
2000
用來在酵素中促長
07:30
entire bacterial chromosomes in yeast.
177
435000
2000
並複製整著細菌染色體
07:32
So we took the same mycoides genome
178
437000
3000
因此我們採用相同於Carole原本移植的
07:35
that Carole had initially transplanted,
179
440000
2000
柔膜菌支原體基因組
07:37
and we grew that in yeast
180
442000
2000
作為人造染色體
07:39
as an artificial chromosome.
181
444000
3000
讓它在酵母中成長
07:42
And we thought this would be a great test bed
182
447000
2000
我們當時認為, 這會是學習如何從酵母中
07:44
for learning how to get chromosomes out of yeast
183
449000
2000
取出染色體並做移植的
07:46
and transplant them.
184
451000
2000
很好的試驗床
07:48
When we did these experiments, though,
185
453000
2000
但當我們做實驗時
07:50
we could get the chromosome out of yeast
186
455000
2000
我們雖能從酵母中取出染色體
07:52
but it wouldn't transplant and boot up a cell.
187
457000
3000
但無法移植並啟動細胞
07:56
That little issue took the team two years to solve.
188
461000
3000
這麼個小問題花了研究團隊兩年才解決
07:59
It turns out, the DNA in the bacterial cell
189
464000
3000
結果發現在細菌細胞裡的DNA
08:02
was actually methylated,
190
467000
2000
原來是經過甲基化的
08:04
and the methylation protects it from the restriction enzyme,
191
469000
3000
而甲基化保護它不接受限制酶
08:08
from digesting the DNA.
192
473000
3000
不能消化DNA
08:11
So what we found is if we took the chromosome
193
476000
2000
因此我們發現, 如果從酵母
08:13
out of yeast and methylated it,
194
478000
2000
取出染色體並將它甲基化
08:15
we could then transplant it.
195
480000
2000
我們就可以移植了
08:17
Further advances came
196
482000
2000
當研究團隊
08:19
when the team removed the restriction enzyme genes
197
484000
3000
將限制酶基因從山羊支原體移除時
08:22
from the recipient capricolum cell.
198
487000
3000
我們便更進了一步
08:25
And once we had done that, now we can take
199
490000
2000
一旦達到這一步
08:27
naked DNA out of yeast and transplant it.
200
492000
3000
我們便能從酵母中取出裸露的DNA進行移植
08:30
So last fall
201
495000
2000
於是去年秋天
08:32
when we published the results of that work in Science,
202
497000
3000
我們在《科學雜誌》發表該研究成果時
08:35
we all became overconfident
203
500000
2000
我們都變得過於自信
08:37
and were sure we were only
204
502000
2000
確信我們只須
08:39
a few weeks away
205
504000
2000
再幾個星期的時間
08:41
from being able to now boot up
206
506000
2000
就能夠啟動
08:43
a chromosome out of yeast.
207
508000
3000
從酵母中取出的染色體
08:46
Because of the problems with
208
511000
2000
由於約一年半前
08:48
Mycoplasma genitalium and its slow growth
209
513000
3000
有過生殖支原體以及其
08:51
about a year and a half ago,
210
516000
3000
成長緩慢的問題
08:54
we decided to synthesize
211
519000
3000
我們決定合成
08:57
the much larger chromosome, the mycoides chromosome,
212
522000
3000
較大的柔膜菌支原體染色體
09:00
knowing that we had the biology worked out on that
213
525000
3000
因為我們在生物學方面已經解決了
09:03
for transplantation.
214
528000
2000
此等染色體的移植問題
09:05
And Dan led the team for the synthesis
215
530000
2000
當時Dan帶領合成這個
09:07
of this over one-million-base pair chromosome.
216
532000
3000
超過百萬核酸鹼基對染色體的研究團隊
09:12
But it turned out it wasn't going to be as simple in the end,
217
537000
3000
但終究發現沒有那麼簡單
09:15
and it set us back three months
218
540000
2000
這讓我們損失三個月時間
09:17
because we had one error
219
542000
2000
因為我們在那個超過
09:19
out of over a million base pairs in that sequence.
220
544000
3000
百萬核酸鹼基對排序中有一個錯誤
09:22
So the team developed new debugging software,
221
547000
3000
於是研究團隊開發了新的糾錯軟體
09:25
where we could test each synthetic fragment
222
550000
3000
用來測試每個合成的片段
09:28
to see if it would grow in a background
223
553000
2000
查看它能否
09:30
of wild type DNA.
224
555000
3000
在雜型的DNA背景下成長
09:33
And we found that 10 out of the 11
225
558000
3000
結果發現我們合成的每十萬個核酸鹼基對裡
09:36
100,000-base pair pieces we synthesized
226
561000
3000
11個之中有10個
09:39
were completely accurate
227
564000
2000
是完全精確的
09:41
and compatible with
228
566000
2000
而且也與
09:43
a life-forming sequence.
229
568000
3000
形成生命的排序相容
09:47
We narrowed it down to one fragment;
230
572000
2000
我們縮小問題的範圍至那一個片段
09:49
we sequenced it
231
574000
2000
為那一個片段作基因排序
09:51
and found just one base pair had been deleted
232
576000
2000
發現只有一個重要基因的
09:53
in an essential gene.
233
578000
2000
一個核酸鹼基對被消除了
09:55
So accuracy is essential.
234
580000
3000
因此精確是至關緊要的
09:58
There's parts of the genome
235
583000
2000
有些基因組的部分
10:00
where it cannot tolerate even a single error,
236
585000
3000
一點小錯都不能容忍
10:03
and then there's parts of the genome
237
588000
2000
還有些基因組的部分
10:05
where we can put in large blocks of DNA,
238
590000
2000
我們可以放入大塊的DNA
10:07
as we did with the watermarks,
239
592000
2000
我們就是這麼放入浮水印的
10:09
and it can tolerate all kinds of errors.
240
594000
3000
這些部分很能容忍各種錯誤
10:12
So it took about three months to find that error
241
597000
3000
於是花費了大約三個月時間找到那個錯誤
10:15
and repair it.
242
600000
2000
並予修正
10:17
And then early one morning, at 6 a.m.
243
602000
3000
然後有一天早上六點鐘
10:20
we got a text from Dan
244
605000
3000
我們收到Dan發來簡訊
10:23
saying that, now, the first blue colonies existed.
245
608000
3000
說是第一個藍色菌落已經形成了
10:26
So, it's been a long route to get here:
246
611000
3000
那麼，達到今天的地步是一條很長的路－
10:29
15 years from the beginning.
247
614000
3000
從開始到現在整整15年
10:32
We felt
248
617000
2000
我們覺得
10:34
one of the tenets of this field
249
619000
2000
這個領域的信條之一是
10:36
was to make absolutely certain
250
621000
3000
要做到完全確定
10:39
we could distinguish synthetic DNA
251
624000
3000
我們要能切實分辨合成DNA
10:42
from natural DNA.
252
627000
2000
和自然DNA的區別
10:44
Early on, when you're working in a new area of science,
253
629000
3000
在科學的一個新領域中進行研究工作時
10:47
you have to think about all the pitfalls
254
632000
3000
很早就要想到所有可能的陷阱
10:50
and things that could lead you
255
635000
2000
以及會誤導你相信有了成果
10:52
to believe that you had done something when you hadn't,
256
637000
3000
但實際並沒有成就什麼的情況
10:55
and, even worse, leading others to believe it.
257
640000
3000
更糟糕的是也誤導了別人相信
10:58
So, we thought the worst problem would be
258
643000
2000
因此我們認為最糟糕的
11:00
a single molecule contamination
259
645000
3000
問題會是由於原本的染色體
11:03
of the native chromosome,
260
648000
2000
有某個單分子受到污染
11:05
leading us to believe that we actually had
261
650000
3000
誤導我們相信我們真的創造出
11:08
created a synthetic cell,
262
653000
2000
一個合成的細胞
11:10
when it would have been just a contaminant.
263
655000
2000
而可能只是一個污染的產物
11:12
So early on, we developed the notion
264
657000
2000
因此我們很早就有了
11:14
of putting in watermarks in the DNA
265
659000
2000
要在DNA裡放入浮水印的想法
11:16
to absolutely make clear
266
661000
2000
以弄清楚那個DNA
11:18
that the DNA was synthetic.
267
663000
3000
絕對毫無疑問是合成的
11:21
And the first chromosome we built
268
666000
3000
我們建構的第一個染色體
11:24
in 2008 --
269
669000
2000
在2008年
11:26
the 500,000-base pair one --
270
671000
2000
那個有五十萬個核酸鹼基對的
11:28
we simply assigned
271
673000
3000
染色體內, 我們放入了
11:31
the names of the authors of the chromosome
272
676000
3000
作者們的姓名
11:34
into the genetic code,
273
679000
3000
在其基因密碼中,
11:37
but it was using just amino acid
274
682000
2000
但當時只採用胺基酸
11:39
single letter translations,
275
684000
2000
的單字母代碼,
11:41
which leaves out certain letters of the alphabet.
276
686000
3000
這個系統省略了字母系統裡的某些字母
11:45
So the team actually developed a new code
277
690000
3000
因此研究團隊開發了一套新密碼
11:48
within the code within the code.
278
693000
3000
那是在密碼裡的密碼裡的密碼
11:51
So it's a new code
279
696000
2000
那麼就是一種新密碼
11:53
for interpreting and writing messages in DNA.
280
698000
3000
用來解讀和書寫在DNA裡的信息
11:56
Now, mathematicians have been hiding and writing
281
701000
3000
是的，數學家長久以來已經在進行著
11:59
messages in the genetic code for a long time,
282
704000
3000
隱藏和書寫基因密碼的工作
12:02
but it's clear they were mathematicians and not biologists
283
707000
3000
但清楚的是他們是數學家不是生物學家
12:05
because, if you write long messages
284
710000
3000
因為如果你使用數學家開發的密碼
12:08
with the code that the mathematicians developed,
285
713000
3000
書寫長的信息
12:11
it would more than likely lead to
286
716000
2000
其結果很可能導致
12:13
new proteins being synthesized
287
718000
3000
新蛋白質的合成
12:16
with unknown functions.
288
721000
3000
而其功能卻不清楚
12:19
So the code that Mike Montague and the team developed
289
724000
3000
那麼Mike Montague和他的團隊開發的密碼
12:22
actually puts frequent stop codons,
290
727000
2000
確實放入常見的停止密碼子
12:24
so it's a different alphabet
291
729000
3000
因此這是一套不同的字母系統
12:27
but allows us to use
292
732000
2000
但卻讓我們能使用
12:29
the entire English alphabet
293
734000
3000
整個英文字母系統裡的字母
12:32
with punctuation and numbers.
294
737000
2000
包含標點和數字
12:34
So, there are four major watermarks
295
739000
2000
於是有四種主要的浮水印
12:36
all over 1,000 base pairs of genetic code.
296
741000
3000
散布在上千個基因密碼的核酸鹼基對裡
12:39
The first one actually contains within it
297
744000
3000
實際包含在內的第一種
12:42
this code for interpreting
298
747000
3000
是用來解讀其它
12:45
the rest of the genetic code.
299
750000
2000
基因密碼的密碼
12:49
So in the remaining information,
300
754000
2000
因此在其餘的訊息中
12:51
in the watermarks,
301
756000
2000
在浮水印裡
12:53
contain the names of, I think it's
302
758000
3000
包含了－我想沒錯－是
12:56
46 different authors
303
761000
2000
46位不同的作者
12:58
and key contributors
304
763000
2000
以及主要的貢獻者
13:00
to getting the project to this stage.
305
765000
3000
他們推動研究專案到達這個地步
13:04
And we also built in
306
769000
2000
而且我們也植入
13:06
a website address
307
771000
3000
一個網站的位址
13:09
so that if somebody decodes the code
308
774000
2000
因此如果有人解開
13:11
within the code within the code,
309
776000
2000
密碼裡的密碼裡的密碼
13:13
they can send an email to that address.
310
778000
2000
就可以傳送一封電子郵件到那個位址
13:15
So it's clearly distinguishable
311
780000
3000
因此可以清楚地分辨出
13:18
from any other species,
312
783000
2000
它與其它物種的區別
13:20
having 46 names in it,
313
785000
3000
因為裡頭有46個姓名
13:23
its own web address.
314
788000
3000
還有它自己的網址
13:27
And we added three quotations,
315
792000
3000
我們還添加了三句引文
13:30
because with the first genome
316
795000
2000
因為做出第一個基因組時
13:32
we were criticized for not trying to say something more profound
317
797000
3000
我們被批評沒有嘗試說些有點深度的言語
13:35
than just signing the work.
318
800000
2000
只為研究工作簽了名
13:37
So we won't give the rest of the code,
319
802000
2000
那麼不多說其它的密碼
13:39
but we will give the three quotations.
320
804000
2000
我們只說那三句引文
13:41
The first is,
321
806000
2000
第一句是
13:43
"To live, to err,
322
808000
2000
「活著、犯錯、
13:45
to fall, to triumph
323
810000
2000
跌跤、獲勝，
13:47
and to recreate life out of life."
324
812000
2000
還要從生命中創造生命。」
13:49
It's a James Joyce quote.
325
814000
2000
這是引自James Joyce的言語
13:53
The second quotation is, "See things not as they are,
326
818000
3000
第二句引文是「見事物勿僅見其然，
13:56
but as they might be."
327
821000
2000
亦當見其或可以然。」
13:58
It's a quote from the "American Prometheus"
328
823000
3000
這是引自談論Robert Oppenheimer的
14:01
book on Robert Oppenheimer.
329
826000
2000
《美國的普羅修斯》的言語
14:03
And the last one is a Richard Feynman quote:
330
828000
3000
最後一句是Richard Feynman的言語
14:06
"What I cannot build,
331
831000
2000
「若是我無法建構，
14:08
I cannot understand."
332
833000
2000
即因我不全然理解。」
14:13
So, because this is as much a philosophical advance
333
838000
3000
那麼由於這是在科學技術上的進步
14:16
as a technical advance in science,
334
841000
3000
也同樣是在哲學上的進步
14:19
we tried to deal with both the philosophical
335
844000
3000
我們試圖處理技術方面的事
14:22
and the technical side.
336
847000
2000
同時也處理哲學方面的事
14:24
The last thing I want to say before turning it over to questions
337
849000
2000
轉到提問之前
14:26
is that the extensive work
338
851000
3000
我最後要說的是
14:29
that we've done --
339
854000
2000
我們大費周章
14:31
asking for ethical review,
340
856000
2000
請求道德方面的評審
14:33
pushing the envelope
341
858000
2000
在那方面推到極限
14:35
on that side as well as the technical side --
342
860000
3000
也在技術方面推到極限
14:38
this has been broadly discussed in the scientific community,
343
863000
3000
這在科學社群裡已經受到廣泛討論
14:41
in the policy community
344
866000
2000
在政策制訂社群裡
14:43
and at the highest levels of the federal government.
345
868000
3000
還有在聯邦政府的最高層也討論
14:46
Even with this announcement,
346
871000
3000
甚至這次的宣佈－
14:49
as we did in 2003 --
347
874000
2000
如同2003年那次－
14:51
that work was funded by the Department of Energy,
348
876000
3000
那個研究是由能源部所資助的－
14:54
so the work was reviewed
349
879000
2000
那麼我們的研究工作
14:56
at the level of the White House,
350
881000
2000
受到白宮層級的評審
14:58
trying to decide whether to classify the work or publish it.
351
883000
3000
以決定此研究是否列為保密或得以發表
15:01
And they came down on the side of open publication,
352
886000
3000
他們最後的決定是站在公開發表這邊
15:04
which is the right approach --
353
889000
3000
這是正確的做法
15:07
we've briefed the White House,
354
892000
2000
我們向白宮做過了報告
15:09
we've briefed members of Congress,
355
894000
3000
我們也向國會做了報告
15:12
we've tried to take and push
356
897000
2000
在科學進步的同時
15:14
the policy issues
357
899000
2000
我們嘗試了
15:16
in parallel with the scientific advances.
358
901000
3000
研擬和推動政策討論
15:20
So with that, I would like
359
905000
2000
這些都做過了
15:22
to open it first to the floor for questions.
360
907000
3000
所以我們現在可以開始接受提問
15:25
Yes, in the back.
361
910000
2000
好的，後面那一位請提問
15:27
Reporter: Could you explain, in layman's terms,
362
912000
2000
記者：可否請您用簡單的語言
15:29
how significant a breakthrough this is please?
363
914000
3000
解釋這個突破到底有多重大？
15:33
Craig Venter: Can we explain how significant this is?
364
918000
2000
CV：可否解釋這個突破有多重大？
15:35
I'm not sure we're the ones that should be explaining how significant it is.
365
920000
3000
我不確定我們有資格做這種解釋
15:38
It's significant to us.
366
923000
2000
對我們而言確是重大突破
15:41
Perhaps it's a giant philosophical change
367
926000
3000
也許在哲學上這是巨大的改變
15:44
in how we view life.
368
929000
2000
它改變我們看待生命的方式
15:46
We actually view it as a baby step in terms of,
369
931000
3000
我們其實把這當作嬰兒學步看待
15:49
it's taken us 15 years to be able
370
934000
2000
因為我們花費15年
15:51
to do the experiment
371
936000
2000
才得以做出
15:53
we wanted to do 15 years ago
372
938000
2000
這15年前想做出
15:55
on understanding life at its basic level.
373
940000
3000
在生命基礎上理解生命的實驗
15:58
But we actually believe
374
943000
2000
不過我們確實相信
16:00
this is going to be a very powerful set of tools
375
945000
3000
這將會是一套非常強大的工具
16:04
and we're already starting
376
949000
2000
我們在許多研究上
16:06
in numerous avenues
377
951000
2000
已經實際開始
16:08
to use this tool.
378
953000
2000
應用這些工具
16:10
We have, at the Institute,
379
955000
2000
我們研究所現在
16:12
ongoing funding now from NIH
380
957000
3000
正在向NIH集資準備
16:15
in a program with Novartis
381
960000
2000
與諾華合作進行一個方案
16:17
to try and use these new
382
962000
2000
以便測試並使用這些
16:19
synthetic DNA tools
383
964000
2000
新的合成DNA的工具
16:21
to perhaps make the flu vaccine
384
966000
3000
或許用來製作明年
16:24
that you might get next year.
385
969000
3000
可能就會用到的流感疫苗
16:27
Because instead of taking weeks to months to make these,
386
972000
3000
因為以往需要花費好幾個星期或好幾個月
16:30
Dan's team can now make these
387
975000
3000
Dan的研究團隊現在可以
16:33
in less than 24 hours.
388
978000
3000
在24小時內完成這些工作
16:36
So when you see how long it took to get an H1N1 vaccine out,
389
981000
3000
那麼想一想H1N1疫苗花費了多少時間
16:39
we think we can shorten that process
390
984000
2000
我們認為我們可以
16:41
quite substantially.
391
986000
2000
大幅縮短那個過程
16:43
In the vaccine area,
392
988000
2000
在疫苗的領域裡
16:45
Synthetic Genomics and the Institute
393
990000
2000
「合成基因組學」和研究所
16:47
are forming a new vaccine company
394
992000
2000
正在組織一個新的疫苗公司
16:49
because we think these tools can affect vaccines
395
994000
3000
因為我們認為這些工具對於至今可能
16:52
to diseases that haven't been possible to date,
396
997000
3000
還無法控制的病毒變體快速演化的
16:55
things where the viruses rapidly evolve,
397
1000000
3000
疾病之疫苗－例如鼻病毒－
16:58
such with rhinovirus.
398
1003000
2000
可能會有所影響
17:00
Wouldn't it be nice to have something that actually blocked common colds?
399
1005000
3000
要是能有可以阻絕一般感冒的東西，不是很好嗎？
17:03
Or, more importantly, HIV,
400
1008000
3000
或更重要的是HIV
17:06
where the virus evolves so quickly
401
1011000
2000
那種病毒變體演化之快
17:08
the vaccines that are made today
402
1013000
2000
今天製作的疫苗
17:10
can't keep up
403
1015000
2000
根本跟不上
17:12
with those evolutionary changes.
404
1017000
3000
那些病毒的演化改變
17:15
Also, at Synthetic Genomics,
405
1020000
2000
還有，在「合成基因組學」
17:17
we've been working
406
1022000
2000
我們一直進行著重大
17:19
on major environmental issues.
407
1024000
2000
環境問題的研究工作
17:21
I think this latest oil spill in the Gulf
408
1026000
2000
我想最進的海灣漏油事件
17:23
is a reminder.
409
1028000
2000
正是一個提醒我們的話題
17:25
We can't see CO2 --
410
1030000
2000
我們看不見二氧化碳
17:27
we depend on scientific measurements for it
411
1032000
2000
我們依靠科學的測量
17:29
and we see the beginning results
412
1034000
2000
我們才剛開始看到
17:31
of having too much of it --
413
1036000
2000
二氧化碳過多的結果
17:33
but we can see pre-CO2 now
414
1038000
2000
卻看到二氧化碳的前身
17:35
floating on the waters
415
1040000
2000
現在就浮動在水面上
17:37
and contaminating the beaches in the Gulf.
416
1042000
3000
污染著海灣的沙灘
17:40
We need some alternatives
417
1045000
3000
我們必須找到一些
17:43
for oil.
418
1048000
2000
替代石油的方案
17:45
We have a program with Exxon Mobile
419
1050000
2000
我們和埃克森美孚有個計畫
17:47
to try and develop new strains of algae
420
1052000
3000
嘗試並開發能夠
17:50
that can efficiently capture carbon dioxide
421
1055000
3000
從大氣中或從高濃度的來源裡
17:53
from the atmosphere or from concentrated sources,
422
1058000
3000
有效捕捉二氧化碳的新種海藻
17:56
make new hydrocarbons that can go into their refineries
423
1061000
3000
製作新的碳水化合物用於他們的煉油廠
17:59
to make normal gasoline
424
1064000
2000
用以製造不產生二氧化碳的
18:01
and diesel fuel out of CO2.
425
1066000
2000
正常汽油和柴油燃料
18:03
Those are just a couple of the approaches
426
1068000
2000
這些只是舉例說明
18:05
and directions that we're taking.
427
1070000
3000
我們的做法和走向
18:08
(Applause)
428
1073000
3000
（掌聲）
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Craig Venter - Biologist, genetics pioneerIn 2001, Craig Venter made headlines for sequencing the human genome. In 2003, he started mapping the ocean's biodiversity. And now he's created the first synthetic lifeforms -- microorganisms that can produce alternative fuels.
Why you should listen
Craig Venter, the man who led the private effort to sequence the human genome, is hard at work now on even more potentially world-changing projects.
First, there's his mission aboard the Sorcerer II, a 92-foot yacht, which, in 2006, finished its voyage around the globe to sample, catalouge and decode the genes of the ocean's unknown microorganisms. Quite a task, when you consider that there are tens of millions of microbes in a single drop of sea water. Then there's the J. Craig Venter Institute, a nonprofit dedicated to researching genomics and exploring its societal implications.
In 2005, Venter founded Synthetic Genomics, a private company with a provocative mission: to engineer new life forms. Its goal is to design, synthesize and assemble synthetic microorganisms that will produce alternative fuels, such as ethanol or hydrogen. He was on Time magzine's 2007 list of the 100 Most Influential People in the World.
In early 2008, scientists at the J. Craig Venter Institute announced that they had manufactured the entire genome of a bacterium by painstakingly stitching together its chemical components. By sequencing a genome, scientists can begin to custom-design bootable organisms, creating biological robots that can produce from scratch chemicals humans can use, such as biofuel. And in 2010, they announced, they had created "synthetic life" -- DNA created digitally, inserted into a living bacterium, and remaining alive.
Craig Venter | Speaker | TED.com