TED2003
Reed Kroloff: A tour of modern architecture
Filmed:
Readability: 3.8
317,569 views
Reed Kroloff gives us a new lens for judging new architecture: is it modern, or is it romantic? Look for glorious images from two leading practices -- and a blistering critique of the 9/11 planning process.
Reed Kroloff - Architecture critic
With an outspoken approach to the problems of rebuilding cites and a fearless eye for design, Reed Kroloff is helping to change the urban landscape of cities from New York to New Orleans. Full bio
With an outspoken approach to the problems of rebuilding cites and a fearless eye for design, Reed Kroloff is helping to change the urban landscape of cities from New York to New Orleans. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:12
To be new at TED -- it's like being the last high-school virgin.
0
0
6000
00:18
(Laughter)
1
6000
2000
00:20
You know that all of the cool people are -- they're doing it.
2
8000
4000
00:24
And you're on the outside, you're at home.
3
12000
2000
00:26
You're like the Raspyni Brothers,
4
14000
2000
00:28
where you've got your balls in cold water. And --
5
16000
4000
00:32
(Laughter) --
6
20000
2000
00:34
you just play with your fingers all day. And then you get invited.
7
22000
5000
00:39
And you're on the inside, and it's everything you hoped it would be.
8
27000
6000
00:45
It's exciting and there's music playing all of the time
9
33000
3000
00:48
and then suddenly it's over. And it's only taken five minutes.
10
36000
4000
00:52
And you want to go back and do it again.
11
40000
3000
00:55
But I really appreciate being here. And thank you, Chris,
12
43000
4000
00:59
and also, thank you, Deborah Patton, for making this possible.
13
47000
4000
01:03
So anyway, today we'll talk about architecture a little bit,
14
51000
4000
01:07
within the subject of creation and optimism.
15
55000
4000
01:11
And if you put creation and optimism together,
16
59000
3000
01:14
you've got two choices that you can talk about.
17
62000
2000
01:16
You can talk about creationism --
18
64000
3000
01:19
which I think wouldn't go down well with this audience,
19
67000
2000
01:21
at least not from a view where you were a proponent of it --
20
69000
3000
01:24
or you can talk about optimisations, spelled the British way, with an S, instead of a Z.
21
72000
6000
01:30
And I think that's what I'd like to talk about today.
22
78000
2000
01:32
But any kind of conversation about architecture --
23
80000
5000
01:37
which is, in fact, what you were just talking about, what was going on here,
24
85000
3000
01:40
setting up TED, small-scale architecture --
25
88000
2000
01:42
at the present time can't really happen without a conversation about this,
26
90000
8000
01:50
the World Trade Center, and what's been going on there, what it means to us.
27
98000
7000
01:57
Because if architecture is what I believe it to be,
28
105000
4000
02:01
which is the built form of our cultural ambitions,
29
109000
4000
02:05
what do you do when presented with an opportunity to rectify a situation
30
113000
8000
02:13
that represents somebody else's cultural ambitions relative to us?
31
121000
5000
02:18
And our own opportunity to make something new there?
32
126000
5000
02:23
This has been a really galvanizing issue for a long time.
33
131000
4000
02:27
I think that the World Trade Center in, rather an unfortunate way,
34
135000
4000
02:31
brought architecture into focus
35
139000
2000
02:33
in a way that I don't think people had thought of in a long time,
36
141000
2000
02:35
and made it a subject for common conversation.
37
143000
3000
02:38
I don't remember, in my 20-year career of practicing and writing about architecture,
38
146000
4000
02:42
a time when five people sat me down at a table
39
150000
2000
02:44
and asked me very serious questions about zoning, fire exiting,
40
152000
6000
02:50
safety concerns and whether carpet burns.
41
158000
3000
02:53
These are just not things we talked about very often.
42
161000
4000
02:57
And yet, now, it's talked about all the time.
43
165000
2000
02:59
At the point where you can weaponize your buildings,
44
167000
5000
03:04
you have to suddenly think about architecture in a very different way.
45
172000
3000
03:07
And so now we're going to think about architecture in a very different way,
46
175000
5000
03:12
we're going to think about it like this.
47
180000
2000
03:14
How many of you saw USA Today, today? There it is. Looks like that.
48
182000
5000
03:19
There's the World Trade Center site, on the front cover.
49
187000
2000
03:21
They've made a selection.
50
189000
2000
03:23
They've chosen a project by Daniel Libeskind,
51
191000
3000
03:26
the enfant terrible of the moment of architecture.
52
194000
4000
03:30
Child-prodigy piano player, he started on the squeezebox,
53
198000
3000
03:33
and moved to a little more serious issue, a bigger instrument,
54
201000
3000
03:36
and now to an even larger instrument,
55
204000
2000
03:38
upon which to work his particular brand of deconstructivist magic,
56
206000
6000
03:44
as you see here.
57
212000
2000
03:46
He was one of six people who were invited to participate in this competition,
58
214000
3000
03:49
after six previous firms struck out
59
217000
5000
03:54
with things that were so stupid and banal
60
222000
2000
03:56
that even the city of New York was forced to go,
61
224000
2000
03:58
"Oh, I'm really sorry, we screwed up."
62
226000
2000
04:00
Right. Can we do this again from the top,
63
228000
4000
04:04
except use some people with a vague hint of talent,
64
232000
2000
04:06
instead of just six utter boobs like we brought in last time,
65
234000
5000
04:11
real estate hacks of the kind who usually plan our cities.
66
239000
3000
04:14
Let's bring in some real architects for a change.
67
242000
2000
04:16
And so we got this, or we had a choice of that. Oh, stop clapping.
68
244000
8000
04:24
(Laughter)
69
252000
2000
04:26
It's too late. That is gone.
70
254000
2000
04:28
This was a scheme by a team called THINK, a New York-based team,
71
256000
3000
04:31
and then there was that one, which was the Libeskind scheme.
72
259000
3000
04:34
This one, this is going to be the new World Trade Center:
73
262000
4000
04:38
a giant hole in the ground with big buildings falling into it.
74
266000
4000
04:42
Now, I don't know what you think, but I think this is a pretty stupid decision,
75
270000
4000
04:46
because what you've done is just made a permanent memorial to destruction
76
274000
5000
04:51
by making it look like the destruction is going to continue forever.
77
279000
4000
04:55
But that's what we're going to do.
78
283000
2000
04:57
But I want you to think about these things
79
285000
3000
05:00
in terms of a kind of ongoing struggle that American architecture represents,
80
288000
4000
05:04
and that these two things talk about very specifically.
81
292000
2000
05:06
And that is the wild divergence in how we choose our architects,
82
294000
5000
05:11
in trying to decide whether we want architecture
83
299000
3000
05:14
from the kind of technocratic solution to everything --
84
302000
3000
05:17
that there is a large, technical answer that can solve all problems,
85
305000
5000
05:22
be they social, be they physical, be they chemical --
86
310000
4000
05:26
or something that's more of a romantic solution.
87
314000
3000
05:29
Now, I don't mean romantic as in, this is a nice place to take someone on a date.
88
317000
4000
05:33
I mean romantic in the sense of, there are things larger and grander than us.
89
321000
6000
05:39
So, in the American tradition,
90
327000
2000
05:41
the difference between the technocratic and the romantic,
91
329000
2000
05:43
would be the difference between Thomas Jefferson's
92
331000
3000
05:46
Cartesian grids spreading across the United States,
93
334000
3000
05:49
that gives us basically the whole shape
94
337000
3000
05:52
of every western state in the United States,
95
340000
2000
05:54
as a really, truly, technocratic solution, a bowing to the --
96
342000
6000
06:00
in Jefferson's time -- current, popular philosophy of rationalism.
97
348000
6000
06:06
Or the way we went to describe that later: manifest destiny.
98
354000
7000
06:13
Now, which would you rather be? A grid, or manifest destiny?
99
361000
5000
06:18
Manifest destiny.
100
366000
2000
06:20
(Laughter)
101
368000
1000
06:21
It's a big deal. It sounds big, it sounds important,
102
369000
4000
06:25
it sounds solid. It sounds American. Ballsy, serious, male.
103
373000
6000
06:31
And that kind of fight has gone on back and forth in architecture all the time.
104
379000
5000
06:36
I mean, it goes on in our private lives, too, every single day.
105
384000
3000
06:39
We all want to go out and buy an Audi TT, don't we?
106
387000
3000
06:42
Everyone here must own one, or at least they craved one
107
390000
3000
06:45
the moment they saw one.
108
393000
2000
06:47
And then they hopped in it, turned the little electronic key,
109
395000
2000
06:49
rather than the real key, zipped home on their new superhighway,
110
397000
4000
06:53
and drove straight into a garage that looks like a Tudor castle.
111
401000
5000
06:58
(Laughter)
112
406000
2000
07:00
Why? Why? Why do you want to do that?
113
408000
2000
07:04
Why do we all want to do that? I even owned a Tudor thing once myself.
114
412000
4000
07:08
(Laughter)
115
416000
1000
07:09
It's in our nature to go ricocheting
116
417000
4000
07:13
back and forth between this technocratic solution
117
421000
5000
07:18
and a larger, sort of more romantic image of where we are.
118
426000
3000
07:21
So we're going to go straight into this.
119
429000
2000
07:23
Can I have the lights off for a moment?
120
431000
2000
07:25
I'm going to talk about two architects very, very briefly
121
433000
3000
07:28
that represent the current split, architecturally,
122
436000
2000
07:30
between these two traditions of a technocratic
123
438000
2000
07:32
or technological solution and a romantic solution.
124
440000
4000
07:36
And these are two of the top architectural practices in the United States today.
125
444000
3000
07:39
One very young, one a little more mature.
126
447000
2000
07:41
This is the work of a firm called SHoP,
127
449000
2000
07:43
and what you're seeing here, is their isometric drawings
128
451000
4000
07:47
of what will be a large-scale camera obscura in a public park.
129
455000
4000
07:51
Does everybody know what a camera obscura is?
130
459000
3000
07:54
Yeah, it's one of those giant camera lenses
131
462000
2000
07:56
that takes a picture of the outside world --
132
464000
2000
07:58
it's sort of a little movie, without any moving parts --
133
466000
3000
08:01
and projects it on a page, and you can see the world outside you as you walk around it.
134
469000
4000
08:05
This is just the outline of it, and you can see,
135
473000
3000
08:08
does it look like a regular building? No.
136
476000
2000
08:10
It's actually non-orthogonal: it's not up and down,
137
478000
2000
08:12
square, rectangular, anything like that,
138
480000
2000
08:14
that you'd see in a normal shape of a building.
139
482000
2000
08:16
The computer revolution, the technocratic, technological revolution,
140
484000
3000
08:19
has allowed us to jettison normal-shaped buildings,
141
487000
3000
08:22
traditionally shaped buildings, in favor of non-orthogonal buildings such as this.
142
490000
4000
08:26
What's interesting about it is not the shape.
143
494000
2000
08:28
What's interesting about it is how it's made. How it's made.
144
496000
4000
08:32
A brand-new way to put buildings together,
145
500000
2000
08:34
something called mass customization. No, it is not an oxymoron.
146
502000
3000
08:37
What makes the building expensive, in the traditional sense,
147
505000
3000
08:40
is making individual parts custom, that you can't do over and over again.
148
508000
3000
08:43
That's why we all live in developer houses.
149
511000
2000
08:45
They all want to save money by building the same thing 500 times.
150
513000
4000
08:49
That's because it's cheaper.
151
517000
2000
08:51
Mass customization works by an architect feeding into a computer,
152
519000
4000
08:55
a program that says, manufacture these parts.
153
523000
3000
08:58
The computer then talks to a machine --
154
526000
2000
09:00
a computer-operated machine, a cad-cam machine --
155
528000
4000
09:04
that can make a zillion different changes, at a moment's notice,
156
532000
3000
09:07
because the computer is just a machine.
157
535000
2000
09:09
It doesn't care. It's manufacturing the parts.
158
537000
3000
09:12
It doesn't see any excess cost. It doesn't spend any extra time.
159
540000
3000
09:15
It's not a laborer -- it's simply an electronic lathe,
160
543000
4000
09:19
so the parts can all be cut at the same time.
161
547000
2000
09:21
Meanwhile, instead of sending someone working drawings,
162
549000
3000
09:24
which are those huge sets of blueprints that you've seen your whole life,
163
552000
3000
09:27
what the architect can do is send a set of assembly instructions,
164
555000
5000
09:32
like you used to get when you were a child,
165
560000
2000
09:34
when you bought little models that said, "Bolt A to B, and C to D."
166
562000
4000
09:38
And so what the builder will get is every single individual part
167
566000
4000
09:42
that has been custom manufactured off-site and delivered on a truck
168
570000
4000
09:46
to the site, to that builder, and a set of these instruction manuals.
169
574000
4000
09:50
Just simple "Bolt A to B" and they will be able to put them together.
170
578000
3000
09:53
Here's the little drawing that tells them how that works --
171
581000
3000
09:56
and that's what will happen in the end.
172
584000
2000
09:58
You're underneath it, looking up into the lens of the camera obscura.
173
586000
3000
10:01
Lest you think this is all fiction, lest you think this is all fantasy, or romance,
174
589000
5000
10:06
these same architects were asked to produce something
175
594000
3000
10:09
for the central courtyard of PS1, which is a museum in Brooklyn, New York,
176
597000
4000
10:13
as part of their young architects summer series.
177
601000
2000
10:15
And they said, well, it's summer, what do you do?
178
603000
2000
10:17
In the summer, you go to the beach.
179
605000
2000
10:19
And when you go to the beach, what do you get? You get sand dunes.
180
607000
2000
10:21
So let's make architectural sand dunes and a beach cabana.
181
609000
3000
10:24
So they went out and they modeled a computer model of a sand dune.
182
612000
4000
10:28
They took photographs, they fed the photographs into their computer program,
183
616000
3000
10:31
and that computer program shaped a sand dune
184
619000
4000
10:35
and then took that sand dune shape and turned it into --
185
623000
3000
10:38
at their instructions, using standard software with slight modifications --
186
626000
4000
10:42
a set of instructions for pieces of wood.
187
630000
3000
10:45
And those are the pieces of wood. Those are the instructions.
188
633000
2000
10:47
These are the pieces, and here's a little of that blown up.
189
635000
3000
10:50
What you can see is there's about six different colors,
190
638000
2000
10:52
and each color represents a type of wood to be cut, a piece of wood to be cut.
191
640000
4000
10:56
All of which were delivered by flat bed, on a truck,
192
644000
3000
10:59
and hand assembled in 48 hours by a team of eight people,
193
647000
6000
11:05
only one of whom had ever seen the plans before.
194
653000
3000
11:08
Only one of whom had ever seen the plans before.
195
656000
3000
11:11
And here comes dune-scape, coming up out of the courtyard,
196
659000
3000
11:14
and there it is fully built.
197
662000
3000
11:17
There are only 16 different pieces of wood,
198
665000
3000
11:21
only 16 different assembly parts here.
199
669000
3000
11:24
Looks like a beautiful piano sounding board on the inside.
200
672000
3000
11:27
It has its own built-in swimming pool, very, very cool.
201
675000
4000
11:31
It's a great place for parties -- it was, it was only up for six weeks.
202
679000
5000
11:36
It's got little dressing rooms and cabanas,
203
684000
3000
11:39
where lots of interesting things went on, all summer long.
204
687000
3000
11:44
Now, lest you think that this is only for the light at heart, or just temporary installations,
205
692000
5000
11:49
this is the same firm working at the World Trade Center,
206
697000
3000
11:52
replacing the bridge that used to go across West Street,
207
700000
4000
11:56
that very important pedestrian connection
208
704000
2000
11:58
between the city of New York and the redevelopment of the West Side.
209
706000
6000
12:04
They were asked to design, replace that bridge in six weeks,
210
712000
3000
12:07
building it, including all of the parts, manufactured.
211
715000
4000
12:11
And they were able to do it. That was their design,
212
719000
2000
12:13
using that same computer modeling system
213
721000
2000
12:15
and only five or six really different kinds of parts,
214
723000
3000
12:18
a couple of struts, like this, some exterior cladding material
215
726000
4000
12:22
and a very simple framing system
216
730000
2000
12:24
that was all manufactured off-site and delivered by truck.
217
732000
2000
12:26
They were able to create that.
218
734000
3000
12:29
They were able to create something wonderful.
219
737000
2000
12:31
They're now building a 16-story building on the side of New York,
220
739000
3000
12:34
using the same technology.
221
742000
2000
12:36
Here we're going to walk across the bridge at night.
222
744000
2000
12:38
It's self-lit, you don't need any overhead lighting,
223
746000
2000
12:40
so the neighbors don't complain about metal-halide lighting in their face.
224
748000
3000
12:43
Here it is going across. And there, down the other side,
225
751000
3000
12:46
and you get the same kind of grandeur.
226
754000
2000
12:48
Now, let me show you, quickly, the opposite, if I may.
227
756000
4000
12:52
Woo, pretty, huh. This is the other side of the coin.
228
760000
3000
12:55
This is the work of David Rockwell from New York City,
229
763000
3000
12:58
whose work you can see out here today.
230
766000
2000
13:00
The current king of the romantics, who approaches his work
231
768000
3000
13:03
in a very different fashion.
232
771000
2000
13:05
It's not to create a technological solution, it's to seduce you
233
773000
3000
13:08
into something that you can do, into something that will please you,
234
776000
4000
13:12
something that will lift your spirits,
235
780000
2000
13:14
something that will make you feel as if are in another world --
236
782000
3000
13:17
such as his Nobu restaurant in New York,
237
785000
3000
13:20
which is supposed to take you from the clutter of New York City
238
788000
4000
13:24
to the simplicity of Japan and the elegance of Japanese tradition.
239
792000
5000
13:29
"When it's all said and done, it's got to look like seaweed," said the owner.
240
797000
5000
13:34
Or his restaurant, Pod, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
241
802000
4000
13:38
I want you to know the room you're looking at is stark white.
242
806000
3000
13:41
Every single surface of this restaurant is white.
243
809000
3000
13:44
The reason it has so much color is that it changes using lighting.
244
812000
5000
13:49
It's all about sensuality. It's all about transforming.
245
817000
4000
13:53
Watch this -- I'm not touching any buttons, ladies and gentlemen.
246
821000
3000
13:56
This is happening by itself.
247
824000
2000
13:58
It transforms through the magic of lighting.
248
826000
2000
14:00
It's all about sensuality. It's all about touch.
249
828000
3000
14:03
Rosa Mexicano restaurant, where he transports us to the shores of Acapulco,
250
831000
5000
14:08
up on the Upper West Side,
251
836000
2000
14:10
with this wall of cliff divers who -- there you go, like that.
252
838000
5000
14:15
Let's see it one more time.
253
843000
2000
14:17
Okay, just to make sure that you've enjoyed it.
254
845000
3000
14:20
And finally, it's about comfort, it's about making you feel good
255
848000
4000
14:24
in places that you wouldn't have felt good before.
256
852000
2000
14:26
It's about bringing nature to the inside.
257
854000
2000
14:28
In the Guardian Tower of New York, converted to a W Union Square --
258
856000
4000
14:32
I'm sorry I'm rushing -- where we had to bring in the best horticulturists in the world
259
860000
5000
14:37
to make sure that the interior of this dragged the garden space
260
865000
3000
14:40
of the court garden of the Union Square into the building itself.
261
868000
4000
14:44
It's about stimulation.
262
872000
2000
14:48
This is a wine-buying experience simplified by color and taste.
263
876000
5000
14:53
Fizzy, fresh, soft, luscious, juicy, smooth, big and sweet wines,
264
881000
4000
14:57
all explained to you by color and texture on the wall.
265
885000
4000
15:01
And finally, it's about entertainment, as in his headquarters
266
889000
4000
15:05
for the Cirque du Soleil, Orlando, Florida,
267
893000
2000
15:07
where you're asked to enter the Greek theater,
268
895000
2000
15:09
look under the tent and join the magic world of Cirque du Soleil.
269
897000
3000
15:12
And I think I'll probably leave it at that. Thank you very much.
270
900000
3000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Reed Kroloff - Architecture criticWith an outspoken approach to the problems of rebuilding cites and a fearless eye for design, Reed Kroloff is helping to change the urban landscape of cities from New York to New Orleans.
Why you should listen
Already known throughout the architecture community for his award-winning tenure as editor-in-chief of Architecture magazine, Reed Kroloff came to the attention of the country at large after Hurricane Katrina. As Dean of Architecture at Tulane University, he was responsible for bringing back 97% of the school's student body and 100% of its faculty after the disaster. In 2005, New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin appointed Kroloff to the Bring New Orleans Back Commission to assist in the reconstruction of the city, and to help avoid creating, in Kroloff's words, "a bad cartoon version of what New Orleans actually is."
His searing 2006 essay "Black Like Me" lays out the frustrations of a citizen of post-Katrina New Orleans -- "the slow-burning frustration of being at the table but not invited to sit down." It's typical of his desire to look past simple aesthetics to the emotional heart of any building project.
Kroloff left New Orleans in 2007 to become the director of the Cranbrook Academy of Art in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. He continues to promote excellence in urban design through his writing and his consulting firm Jones | Kroloff. He is also an active organizer and adviser for dozens of New Public Works competitions designed to choose architects for high-profile projects, including the Motown Center in Detroit, and a signature building for the University of Connecticut campus (the contract for which was awarded to Frank Gehry).
Reed Kroloff | Speaker | TED.com