TEDGlobal 2005
Charles Leadbeater: The era of open innovation
Filmed:
Readability: 4.4
1,715,597 views
In this deceptively casual talk, Charles Leadbeater weaves a tight argument that innovation isn't just for professionals anymore. Passionate amateurs, using new tools, are creating products and paradigms that companies can't.
Charles Leadbeater - Innovation consultant
A researcher at the London think tank Demos, Charles Leadbeater was early to notice the rise of "amateur innovation" -- great ideas from outside the traditional walls, from people who suddenly have the tools to collaborate, innovate and make their expertise known. Full bio
A researcher at the London think tank Demos, Charles Leadbeater was early to notice the rise of "amateur innovation" -- great ideas from outside the traditional walls, from people who suddenly have the tools to collaborate, innovate and make their expertise known. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:25
What I'm going to do, in the spirit of collaborative creativity,
0
0
3000
00:28
is simply repeat many of the points
1
3000
3000
00:31
that the three people before me have already made,
2
6000
3000
00:34
but do them --
3
9000
2000
00:36
this is called "creative collaboration;"
4
11000
2000
00:38
it's actually called "borrowing" --
5
13000
1000
00:41
but do it through a particular perspective,
6
16000
2000
00:43
and that is to ask about the role of users and consumers
7
18000
3000
00:46
in this emerging world of
8
21000
2000
00:48
collaborative creativity
9
23000
2000
00:50
that Jimmy and others have talked about.
10
25000
3000
00:53
Let me just ask you, to start with,
11
28000
2000
00:55
this simple question:
12
30000
2000
00:57
who invented the mountain bike?
13
32000
2000
00:59
Because traditional economic theory would say,
14
34000
3000
01:02
well, the mountain bike was probably invented by some big bike corporation
15
37000
3000
01:05
that had a big R&D lab
16
40000
2000
01:07
where they were thinking up new projects,
17
42000
2000
01:09
and it came out of there. It didn't come from there.
18
44000
3000
01:12
Another answer might be, well, it came from a sort of lone genius
19
47000
3000
01:15
working in his garage, who,
20
50000
2000
01:17
working away on different kinds of bikes, comes up
21
52000
2000
01:19
with a bike out of thin air.
22
54000
2000
01:21
It didn't come from there. The mountain bike
23
56000
2000
01:23
came from users, came from young users,
24
58000
4000
01:27
particularly a group in Northern California,
25
62000
2000
01:29
who were frustrated with traditional racing bikes,
26
64000
3000
01:32
which were those sort of bikes that Eddy Merckx rode,
27
67000
3000
01:35
or your big brother, and they're very glamorous.
28
70000
2000
01:37
But also frustrated with the bikes that your dad rode,
29
72000
3000
01:40
which sort of had big handlebars like that, and they were too heavy.
30
75000
3000
01:43
So, they got the frames from these big bikes,
31
78000
2000
01:45
put them together with the gears from the racing bikes,
32
80000
3000
01:48
got the brakes from motorcycles,
33
83000
4000
01:52
and sort of mixed and matched various ingredients.
34
87000
2000
01:54
And for the first, I don't know, three to five years of their life,
35
89000
3000
01:57
mountain bikes were known as "clunkers."
36
92000
2000
01:59
And they were just made in a community of bikers,
37
94000
3000
02:02
mainly in Northern California.
38
97000
2000
02:04
And then one of these companies that was importing parts
39
99000
3000
02:07
for the clunkers decided to set up in business,
40
102000
2000
02:09
start selling them to other people,
41
104000
2000
02:11
and gradually another company emerged out of that, Marin,
42
106000
3000
02:14
and it probably was, I don't know,
43
109000
2000
02:16
10, maybe even 15, years,
44
111000
2000
02:18
before the big bike companies
45
113000
2000
02:20
realized there was a market.
46
115000
2000
02:22
Thirty years later,
47
117000
2000
02:24
mountain bike sales
48
119000
2000
02:26
and mountain bike equipment
49
121000
2000
02:28
account for 65 percent of bike sales in America.
50
123000
2000
02:30
That's 58 billion dollars.
51
125000
3000
02:33
This is a category entirely created by consumers
52
128000
3000
02:36
that would not have been created by the mainstream bike market
53
131000
3000
02:39
because they couldn't see the need,
54
134000
2000
02:41
the opportunity;
55
136000
2000
02:43
they didn't have the incentive to innovate.
56
138000
3000
02:46
The one thing I think I disagree with
57
141000
2000
02:48
about Yochai's presentation
58
143000
2000
02:50
is when he said the Internet causes
59
145000
2000
02:52
this distributive capacity for innovation to come alive.
60
147000
3000
02:55
It's when the Internet combines
61
150000
3000
02:58
with these kinds of passionate pro-am consumers --
62
153000
3000
03:01
who are knowledgeable; they've got the incentive to innovate;
63
156000
3000
03:04
they've got the tools; they want to --
64
159000
2000
03:06
that you get this kind of explosion
65
161000
2000
03:08
of creative collaboration.
66
163000
3000
03:11
And out of that, you get the need for the kind of things
67
166000
3000
03:14
that Jimmy was talking about, which is our new kinds of organization,
68
169000
3000
03:17
or a better way to put it:
69
172000
2000
03:19
how do we organize ourselves without organizations?
70
174000
3000
03:22
That's now possible; you don't need an organization to be organized,
71
177000
4000
03:26
to achieve large and complex tasks,
72
181000
2000
03:28
like innovating new software programs.
73
183000
3000
03:31
So this is a huge challenge
74
186000
3000
03:34
to the way we think creativity comes about.
75
189000
3000
03:38
The traditional view, still enshrined
76
193000
2000
03:40
in much of the way that we think about creativity
77
195000
3000
03:43
-- in organizations, in government --
78
198000
2000
03:45
is that creativity is about special people:
79
200000
3000
03:48
wear baseball caps the wrong way round,
80
203000
2000
03:50
come to conferences like this, in special places,
81
205000
3000
03:53
elite universities, R&D labs in the forests, water,
82
208000
4000
03:58
maybe special rooms in companies painted funny colors,
83
213000
3000
04:01
you know, bean bags, maybe the odd table-football table.
84
216000
3000
04:05
Special people, special places, think up special ideas,
85
220000
3000
04:08
then you have a pipeline that takes the ideas
86
223000
2000
04:10
down to the waiting consumers, who are passive.
87
225000
3000
04:14
They can say "yes" or "no" to the invention.
88
229000
2000
04:16
That's the idea of creativity.
89
231000
2000
04:18
What's the policy recommendation out of that
90
233000
2000
04:20
if you're in government, or you're running a large company?
91
235000
3000
04:24
More special people, more special places.
92
239000
3000
04:27
Build creative clusters in cities;
93
242000
2000
04:29
create more R&D parks, so on and so forth.
94
244000
3000
04:32
Expand the pipeline down to the consumers.
95
247000
3000
04:35
Well this view, I think, is increasingly wrong.
96
250000
3000
04:38
I think it's always been wrong,
97
253000
2000
04:40
because I think always creativity has been highly collaborative,
98
255000
3000
04:43
and it's probably been largely interactive.
99
258000
3000
04:46
But it's increasingly wrong, and one of the reasons it's wrong
100
261000
3000
04:49
is that the ideas are flowing back up the pipeline.
101
264000
3000
04:52
The ideas are coming back from the consumers,
102
267000
2000
04:54
and they're often ahead of the producers.
103
269000
3000
04:57
Why is that?
104
272000
2000
04:59
Well, one issue
105
274000
3000
05:02
is that radical innovation,
106
277000
2000
05:04
when you've got ideas that
107
279000
2000
05:06
affect a large number of technologies or people,
108
281000
4000
05:10
have a great deal of uncertainty attached to them.
109
285000
2000
05:12
The payoffs to innovation are greatest
110
287000
2000
05:14
where the uncertainty is highest.
111
289000
3000
05:17
And when you get a radical innovation,
112
292000
2000
05:19
it's often very uncertain how it can be applied.
113
294000
3000
05:22
The whole history of telephony
114
297000
2000
05:24
is a story of dealing with that uncertainty.
115
299000
4000
05:28
The very first landline telephones,
116
303000
2000
05:30
the inventors thought
117
305000
2000
05:32
that they would be used for people to listen in
118
307000
2000
05:34
to live performances
119
309000
2000
05:36
from West End theaters.
120
311000
2000
05:38
When the mobile telephone companies invented SMS,
121
313000
3000
05:41
they had no idea what it was for;
122
316000
2000
05:43
it was only when that technology got into the hands
123
318000
2000
05:45
of teenage users
124
320000
2000
05:47
that they invented the use.
125
322000
2000
05:49
So the more radical the innovation,
126
324000
3000
05:52
the more the uncertainty,
127
327000
2000
05:54
the more you need innovation in use
128
329000
2000
05:56
to work out what a technology is for.
129
331000
3000
05:59
All of our patents, our entire approach
130
334000
3000
06:02
to patents and invention, is based on the idea
131
337000
3000
06:05
that the inventor knows what the invention is for;
132
340000
3000
06:08
we can say what it's for.
133
343000
2000
06:10
More and more, the inventors of things
134
345000
2000
06:12
will not be able to say that in advance.
135
347000
2000
06:14
It will be worked out in use,
136
349000
2000
06:16
in collaboration with users.
137
351000
3000
06:19
We like to think that invention is
138
354000
2000
06:21
a sort of moment of creation:
139
356000
3000
06:24
there is a moment of birth when someone comes up with an idea.
140
359000
3000
06:27
The truth is that most creativity
141
362000
3000
06:30
is cumulative and collaborative;
142
365000
2000
06:32
like Wikipedia, it develops over a long period of time.
143
367000
4000
06:37
The second reason why users are more and more important
144
372000
3000
06:40
is that they are the source of big, disruptive innovations.
145
375000
4000
06:44
If you want to find the big new ideas,
146
379000
3000
06:47
it's often difficult to find them in mainstream markets,
147
382000
3000
06:50
in big organizations.
148
385000
3000
06:53
And just look inside large organizations
149
388000
2000
06:55
and you'll see why that is so.
150
390000
2000
06:57
So, you're in a big corporation.
151
392000
4000
07:01
You're obviously keen to go up the corporate ladder.
152
396000
3000
07:04
Do you go into your board and say,
153
399000
2000
07:06
"Look, I've got a fantastic idea
154
401000
2000
07:08
for an embryonic product
155
403000
2000
07:10
in a marginal market,
156
405000
2000
07:12
with consumers we've never dealt with before,
157
407000
3000
07:15
and I'm not sure it's going to have a big payoff, but it could be really, really big in the future?"
158
410000
3000
07:18
No, what you do, is you go in and you say,
159
413000
3000
07:21
"I've got a fantastic idea for an incremental innovation
160
416000
3000
07:24
to an existing product we sell through existing channels
161
419000
3000
07:27
to existing users, and I can guarantee
162
422000
2000
07:29
you get this much return out of it over the next three years."
163
424000
4000
07:33
Big corporations have an in-built tendency
164
428000
2000
07:35
to reinforce past success.
165
430000
2000
07:37
They've got so much sunk in it
166
432000
2000
07:39
that it's very difficult for them to spot
167
434000
3000
07:42
emerging new markets. Emerging new markets, then,
168
437000
3000
07:45
are the breeding grounds for passionate users.
169
440000
3000
07:48
Best example:
170
443000
2000
07:50
who in the music industry,
171
445000
2000
07:52
30 years ago, would have said,
172
447000
3000
07:55
"Yes, let's invent a musical form
173
450000
3000
07:58
which is all about dispossessed black men
174
453000
3000
08:01
in ghettos expressing their frustration
175
456000
2000
08:03
with the world through a form of music
176
458000
2000
08:05
that many people find initially quite difficult to listen to.
177
460000
3000
08:08
That sounds like a winner; we'll go with it."
178
463000
3000
08:11
(Laughter).
179
466000
1000
08:12
So what happens? Rap music is created by the users.
180
467000
3000
08:15
They do it on their own tapes, with their own recording equipment;
181
470000
3000
08:18
they distribute it themselves.
182
473000
1000
08:19
30 years later,
183
474000
2000
08:21
rap music is the dominant musical form of popular culture --
184
476000
3000
08:24
would never have come from the big companies.
185
479000
2000
08:26
Had to start -- this is the third point --
186
481000
3000
08:29
with these pro-ams.
187
484000
2000
08:31
This is the phrase that I've used in
188
486000
2000
08:33
some stuff which I've done
189
488000
2000
08:35
with a think tank in London called Demos,
190
490000
2000
08:37
where we've been looking at these people who are amateurs --
191
492000
3000
08:40
i.e., they do it for the love of it --
192
495000
3000
08:43
but they want to do it to very high standards.
193
498000
2000
08:45
And across a whole range of fields --
194
500000
2000
08:47
from software, astronomy,
195
502000
4000
08:51
natural sciences,
196
506000
2000
08:53
vast areas of leisure and culture
197
508000
2000
08:55
like kite-surfing, so on and so forth --
198
510000
3000
08:58
you find people who want to do things because they love it,
199
513000
4000
09:02
but they want to do these things to very high standards.
200
517000
3000
09:05
They work at their leisure, if you like.
201
520000
2000
09:07
They take their leisure very seriously:
202
522000
2000
09:09
they acquire skills; they invest time;
203
524000
3000
09:12
they use technology that's getting cheaper -- it's not just the Internet:
204
527000
3000
09:15
cameras, design technology,
205
530000
3000
09:18
leisure technology, surfboards, so on and so forth.
206
533000
3000
09:21
Largely through globalization,
207
536000
2000
09:23
a lot of this equipment has got a lot cheaper.
208
538000
3000
09:26
More knowledgeable consumers, more educated,
209
541000
3000
09:29
more able to connect with one another,
210
544000
2000
09:31
more able to do things together.
211
546000
2000
09:33
Consumption, in that sense, is an expression
212
548000
2000
09:35
of their productive potential.
213
550000
2000
09:37
Why, we found, people were interested in this,
214
552000
4000
09:41
is that at work they don't feel very expressed.
215
556000
3000
09:44
They don't feel as if they're doing something that really matters to them,
216
559000
3000
09:47
so they pick up these kinds of activities.
217
562000
3000
09:50
This has huge organizational implications
218
565000
2000
09:52
for very large areas of life.
219
567000
2000
09:54
Take astronomy as an example,
220
569000
3000
09:57
which Yochai has already mentioned.
221
572000
2000
10:00
Twenty years ago, 30 years ago,
222
575000
2000
10:02
only big professional astronomers
223
577000
3000
10:05
with very big telescopes could see far into space.
224
580000
4000
10:09
And there's a big telescope in Northern England called Jodrell Bank,
225
584000
3000
10:12
and when I was a kid, it was amazing,
226
587000
2000
10:14
because the moon shots would take off, and this thing would move on rails.
227
589000
3000
10:17
And it was huge -- it was absolutely enormous.
228
592000
3000
10:20
Now, six
229
595000
3000
10:23
amateur astronomers, working with the Internet,
230
598000
2000
10:25
with Dobsonian digital telescopes --
231
600000
2000
10:27
which are pretty much open source --
232
602000
3000
10:30
with some light sensors
233
605000
2000
10:32
developed over the last 10 years, the Internet --
234
607000
2000
10:34
they can do what Jodrell Bank could only do 30 years ago.
235
609000
4000
10:38
So here in astronomy, you have this vast explosion
236
613000
3000
10:41
of new productive resources.
237
616000
2000
10:43
The users can be producers.
238
618000
3000
10:46
What does this mean, then, for our
239
621000
2000
10:48
organizational landscape?
240
623000
2000
10:50
Well, just imagine a world,
241
625000
2000
10:52
for the moment, divided into two camps.
242
627000
4000
10:56
Over here, you've got the old, traditional corporate model:
243
631000
3000
10:59
special people, special places;
244
634000
2000
11:01
patent it, push it down the pipeline
245
636000
2000
11:03
to largely waiting, passive consumers.
246
638000
3000
11:06
Over here, let's imagine we've got
247
641000
2000
11:08
Wikipedia, Linux, and beyond -- open source.
248
643000
4000
11:12
This is open; this is closed.
249
647000
2000
11:14
This is new; this is traditional.
250
649000
2000
11:16
Well, the first thing you can say, I think with certainty,
251
651000
3000
11:19
is what Yochai has said already --
252
654000
2000
11:21
is there is a great big struggle
253
656000
2000
11:23
between those two organizational forms.
254
658000
2000
11:25
These people over there will do everything they can
255
660000
3000
11:28
to stop these kinds of organizations succeeding,
256
663000
3000
11:31
because they're threatened by them.
257
666000
2000
11:33
And so the debates about
258
668000
3000
11:36
copyright, digital rights, so on and so forth --
259
671000
4000
11:40
these are all about trying to stifle, in my view,
260
675000
3000
11:43
these kinds of organizations.
261
678000
2000
11:45
What we're seeing is a complete corruption
262
680000
3000
11:48
of the idea of patents and copyright.
263
683000
2000
11:50
Meant to be a way to incentivize invention,
264
685000
4000
11:54
meant to be a way to orchestrate the dissemination of knowledge,
265
689000
3000
11:57
they are increasingly being used by large companies
266
692000
3000
12:00
to create thickets of patents
267
695000
2000
12:02
to prevent innovation taking place.
268
697000
2000
12:04
Let me just give you two examples.
269
699000
3000
12:07
The first is: imagine yourself going to a venture capitalist
270
702000
3000
12:10
and saying, "I've got a fantastic idea.
271
705000
2000
12:12
I've invented this brilliant new program
272
707000
3000
12:15
that is much, much better than Microsoft Outlook."
273
710000
3000
12:19
Which venture capitalist in their right mind is going to give you any money to set up a venture
274
714000
4000
12:23
competing with Microsoft, with Microsoft Outlook? No one.
275
718000
3000
12:26
That is why the competition with Microsoft is bound to come --
276
721000
3000
12:29
will only come --
277
724000
2000
12:31
from an open-source kind of project.
278
726000
2000
12:33
So, there is a huge competitive argument
279
728000
2000
12:35
about sustaining the capacity
280
730000
2000
12:37
for open-source and consumer-driven innovation,
281
732000
3000
12:40
because it's one of the greatest
282
735000
2000
12:42
competitive levers against monopoly.
283
737000
3000
12:45
There'll be huge professional arguments as well.
284
740000
3000
12:48
Because the professionals, over here
285
743000
2000
12:50
in these closed organizations --
286
745000
2000
12:52
they might be academics; they might be programmers;
287
747000
2000
12:54
they might be doctors; they might be journalists --
288
749000
3000
12:57
my former profession --
289
752000
2000
12:59
say, "No, no -- you can't trust these people over here."
290
754000
2000
13:03
When I started in journalism --
291
758000
2000
13:05
Financial Times, 20 years ago --
292
760000
3000
13:09
it was very, very exciting
293
764000
2000
13:11
to see someone reading the newspaper.
294
766000
2000
13:13
And you'd kind of look over their shoulder on the Tube
295
768000
2000
13:15
to see if they were reading your article.
296
770000
3000
13:18
Usually they were reading the share prices,
297
773000
2000
13:20
and the bit of the paper with your article on
298
775000
2000
13:22
was on the floor, or something like that,
299
777000
2000
13:24
and you know, "For heaven's sake, what are they doing!
300
779000
2000
13:26
They're not reading my brilliant article!"
301
781000
3000
13:29
And we allowed users, readers,
302
784000
3000
13:32
two places where they could contribute to the paper:
303
787000
2000
13:34
the letters page, where they could write a letter in,
304
789000
3000
13:37
and we would condescend to them, cut it in half,
305
792000
2000
13:39
and print it three days later.
306
794000
2000
13:41
Or the op-ed page, where if they knew the editor --
307
796000
2000
13:43
had been to school with him, slept with his wife --
308
798000
2000
13:45
they could write an article for the op-ed page.
309
800000
3000
13:48
Those were the two places.
310
803000
2000
13:50
Shock, horror: now, the readers want to be writers and publishers.
311
805000
4000
13:54
That's not their role; they're supposed to read what we write.
312
809000
3000
13:57
But they don't want to be journalists. The journalists think
313
812000
2000
13:59
that the bloggers want to be journalists;
314
814000
2000
14:01
they don't want to be journalists; they just want to have a voice.
315
816000
2000
14:03
They want to, as Jimmy said, they want to have a dialogue, a conversation.
316
818000
3000
14:06
They want to be part of that flow of information.
317
821000
4000
14:10
What's happening there is that the whole domain
318
825000
2000
14:12
of creativity is expanding.
319
827000
2000
14:14
So, there's going to be a tremendous struggle.
320
829000
3000
14:17
But, also, there's going to be tremendous movement
321
832000
3000
14:20
from the open to the closed.
322
835000
3000
14:23
What you'll see, I think, is two things that are critical,
323
838000
3000
14:26
and these, I think, are two challenges
324
841000
2000
14:28
for the open movement.
325
843000
2000
14:30
The first is:
326
845000
2000
14:32
can we really survive on volunteers?
327
847000
3000
14:35
If this is so critical,
328
850000
2000
14:37
do we not need it funded, organized, supported
329
852000
3000
14:40
in much more structured ways?
330
855000
2000
14:42
I think the idea of creating the Red Cross
331
857000
2000
14:44
for information and knowledge is a fantastic idea,
332
859000
3000
14:47
but can we really organize that, just on volunteers?
333
862000
4000
14:51
What kind of changes do we need in public policy
334
866000
2000
14:53
and funding to make that possible?
335
868000
2000
14:55
What's the role of the BBC,
336
870000
2000
14:57
for instance, in that world?
337
872000
2000
14:59
What should be the role of public policy?
338
874000
2000
15:01
And finally, what I think you will see
339
876000
3000
15:04
is the intelligent, closed organizations
340
879000
3000
15:07
moving increasingly in the open direction.
341
882000
3000
15:10
So it's not going to be a contest between two camps,
342
885000
3000
15:13
but, in between them, you'll find all sorts of interesting places
343
888000
3000
15:16
that people will occupy.
344
891000
2000
15:18
New organizational models coming about,
345
893000
3000
15:21
mixing closed and open in tricky ways.
346
896000
3000
15:24
It won't be so clear-cut; it won't be Microsoft versus Linux --
347
899000
4000
15:28
there'll be all sorts of things in between.
348
903000
2000
15:30
And those organizational models, it turns out,
349
905000
2000
15:32
are incredibly powerful,
350
907000
2000
15:34
and the people who can understand them
351
909000
2000
15:36
will be very, very successful.
352
911000
2000
15:38
Let me just give you one final example
353
913000
3000
15:41
of what that means.
354
916000
2000
15:43
I was in Shanghai,
355
918000
2000
15:45
in an office block
356
920000
2000
15:47
built on what was a rice paddy five years ago --
357
922000
3000
15:50
one of the 2,500 skyscrapers
358
925000
3000
15:53
they've built in Shanghai in the last 10 years.
359
928000
3000
15:56
And I was having dinner with this guy called Timothy Chan.
360
931000
3000
15:59
Timothy Chan set up an Internet business
361
934000
2000
16:01
in 2000.
362
936000
2000
16:03
Didn't go into the Internet, kept his money,
363
938000
3000
16:06
decided to go into computer games.
364
941000
2000
16:08
He runs a company called Shanda,
365
943000
3000
16:11
which is the largest computer games company in China.
366
946000
4000
16:15
Nine thousand servers all over China,
367
950000
3000
16:18
has 250 million subscribers.
368
953000
4000
16:22
At any one time, there are four million people playing one of his games.
369
957000
4000
16:27
How many people does he employ
370
962000
2000
16:29
to service that population?
371
964000
3000
16:32
500 people.
372
967000
2000
16:34
Well, how can he service
373
969000
2000
16:36
250 million people from 500 employees?
374
971000
3000
16:39
Because basically, he doesn't service them.
375
974000
2000
16:41
He gives them a platform;
376
976000
2000
16:43
he gives them some rules; he gives them the tools
377
978000
3000
16:46
and then he kind of orchestrates the conversation;
378
981000
3000
16:49
he orchestrates the action.
379
984000
2000
16:51
But actually, a lot of the content
380
986000
2000
16:53
is created by the users themselves.
381
988000
3000
16:56
And it creates a kind of stickiness
382
991000
2000
16:58
between the community and the company
383
993000
2000
17:00
which is really, really powerful.
384
995000
2000
17:02
The best measure of that: so you go into one of his games,
385
997000
3000
17:05
you create a character
386
1000000
2000
17:07
that you develop in the course of the game.
387
1002000
2000
17:09
If, for some reason, your credit card bounces,
388
1004000
3000
17:12
or there's some other problem,
389
1007000
2000
17:14
you lose your character.
390
1009000
2000
17:16
You've got two options.
391
1011000
2000
17:18
One option: you can create a new character,
392
1013000
3000
17:21
right from scratch, but with none of the history of your player.
393
1016000
3000
17:24
That costs about 100 dollars.
394
1019000
2000
17:26
Or you can get on a plane, fly to Shanghai,
395
1021000
3000
17:29
queue up outside Shanda's offices --
396
1024000
3000
17:32
cost probably 600, 700 dollars --
397
1027000
4000
17:36
and reclaim your character, get your history back.
398
1031000
3000
17:39
Every morning, there are 600 people queuing
399
1034000
2000
17:41
outside their offices
400
1036000
2000
17:43
to reclaim these characters. (Laughter)
401
1038000
2000
17:45
So this is about companies built on communities,
402
1040000
3000
17:48
that provide communities with tools,
403
1043000
3000
17:51
resources, platforms in which they can share.
404
1046000
2000
17:53
He's not open source,
405
1048000
2000
17:55
but it's very, very powerful.
406
1050000
2000
17:57
So here is one of the challenges, I think,
407
1052000
3000
18:00
for people like me, who
408
1055000
2000
18:02
do a lot of work with government.
409
1057000
3000
18:05
If you're a games company,
410
1060000
3000
18:08
and you've got a million players in your game,
411
1063000
3000
18:11
you only need one percent of them
412
1066000
3000
18:14
to be co-developers, contributing ideas,
413
1069000
2000
18:16
and you've got a development workforce
414
1071000
2000
18:18
of 10,000 people.
415
1073000
3000
18:21
Imagine you could take all the children
416
1076000
3000
18:24
in education in Britain, and one percent of them
417
1079000
3000
18:27
were co-developers of education.
418
1082000
2000
18:29
What would that do to the resources available
419
1084000
2000
18:31
to the education system?
420
1086000
2000
18:33
Or if you got one percent of the patients in the NHS
421
1088000
3000
18:36
to, in some sense, be co-producers of health.
422
1091000
3000
18:39
The reason why --
423
1094000
2000
18:41
despite all the efforts to cut it down,
424
1096000
3000
18:44
to constrain it, to hold it back --
425
1099000
2000
18:46
why these open models will still start emerging
426
1101000
3000
18:49
with tremendous force,
427
1104000
2000
18:51
is that they multiply our productive resources.
428
1106000
2000
18:53
And one of the reasons they do that
429
1108000
2000
18:55
is that they turn users into producers,
430
1110000
2000
18:57
consumers into designers.
431
1112000
2000
18:59
Thank you very much.
432
1114000
2000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Charles Leadbeater - Innovation consultantA researcher at the London think tank Demos, Charles Leadbeater was early to notice the rise of "amateur innovation" -- great ideas from outside the traditional walls, from people who suddenly have the tools to collaborate, innovate and make their expertise known.
Why you should listen
Charles Leadbeater's theories on innovation have compelled some of the world's largest organizations to rethink their strategies. A financial journalist turned innovation consultant (for clients ranging from the British government to Microsoft), Leadbeater noticed the rise of "pro-ams" -- passionate amateurs who act like professionals, making breakthrough discoveries in many fields, from software to astronomy to kite-surfing. His 2004 essay "The Pro-Am Revolution" -- which The New York Times called one of the year's biggest global ideas -- highlighted the rise of this new breed of amateur.
Prominent examples range from the mountain bike to the open-source operating system Linux, from Wikipedia to the Jubilee 2000 campaign, which helped persuade Western nations to cancel more than $30 billion in third-world debt. In his upcoming book, We-Think, Leadbeater explores how this emerging culture of mass creativity and participation could reshape companies and governments. A business reporter by training, he was previously an editor for the Financial Times, and later, The Independent, where, with Helen Fielding, he developed the "Bridget Jones' Diary" column. Currently, he is researching for Atlas of Ideas, a program that is mapping changes in the global geography of science and innovation.
Charles Leadbeater | Speaker | TED.com