ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Susan Shaw - Marine toxicologist
Susan Shaw is an internationally recognized marine toxicologist, author and explorer.

Why you should listen

For two decades, Susan Shaw has investigated the effects of environmental chemicals in marine animals. She is credited as the first scientist to show that flame-retardant chemicals in consumer products have contaminated marine mammals and commercially important fish stocks in the northwest Atlantic Ocean.

An outspoken and influential voice on ocean pollution, Shaw dove in the Gulf oil slick in May and observed first-hand how oil and dispersants are impacting life in the water column. The experience prompted her to call for a collaborative, Gulf-wide effort to track effects as the toxins ripple through the food web. She was instrumental in creating the Consensus Statement opposing further use of dispersants in the Gulf.

Shaw serves on the International Panel on Chemical Pollution, a select group of scientists urging policymakers to improve management of toxic chemicals. She travels throughout the US, Europe and Asia as a speaker on the ocean crisis and chemical pollution.

More profile about the speaker
Susan Shaw | Speaker | TED.com
TEDxOilSpill

Susan Shaw: The oil spill's toxic trade-off

Filmed:
233,685 views

Break down the oil slick, keep it off the shores: that's grounds for pumping toxic dispersant into the Gulf, say clean-up overseers. Susan Shaw shows evidence it's sparing some beaches only at devastating cost to the health of the deep sea.
- Marine toxicologist
Susan Shaw is an internationally recognized marine toxicologist, author and explorer. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:15
I am a marine toxicologist,
0
0
2000
00:17
and I've been very, very concerned about the Gulf,
1
2000
3000
00:20
particularly about the massive applications
2
5000
3000
00:23
of the toxic dispersants,
3
8000
2000
00:25
the Corexits.
4
10000
2000
00:27
I've been working on ocean pollution
5
12000
2000
00:29
for quite a long time --
6
14000
2000
00:31
the impacts on marine life and particularly the impacts
7
16000
3000
00:34
on marine mammals.
8
19000
2000
00:36
As it turns out, marine mammals
9
21000
2000
00:38
are at the top of this food chain
10
23000
2000
00:40
that we're pouring millions of tons
11
25000
3000
00:43
of toxic substances into
12
28000
2000
00:45
every year.
13
30000
2000
00:47
And they are showing the signs of this.
14
32000
3000
00:50
I'm sorry to have a sad slide like this,
15
35000
2000
00:52
but not everything is all that happy,
16
37000
3000
00:55
especially in my work.
17
40000
2000
00:59
They are loaded
18
44000
2000
01:01
with toxic chemicals in their body,
19
46000
2000
01:03
hundreds of compounds,
20
48000
2000
01:05
all kinds of compounds -- it's staggering.
21
50000
2000
01:07
And they're dying off rather regularly,
22
52000
2000
01:09
tens of thousands around the world.
23
54000
3000
01:12
It's predicted they may go extinct --
24
57000
2000
01:14
about a third of them --
25
59000
2000
01:16
within about 30 years.
26
61000
2000
01:18
So my project is along the Northwest Atlantic.
27
63000
3000
01:21
It's called Seals as Sentinels.
28
66000
2000
01:23
We're tracking pollution
29
68000
2000
01:25
at the top of the food web, in marine mammals and fish.
30
70000
3000
01:28
It's a region-wide,
31
73000
2000
01:30
eco-toxicological investigation.
32
75000
3000
01:33
We're looking at a lot of compounds,
33
78000
2000
01:35
but recently been quite interested in
34
80000
2000
01:37
the flame retardants, the brominated flame retardants
35
82000
3000
01:40
that are in many, many things
36
85000
2000
01:42
that we use in our everyday life,
37
87000
2000
01:44
from the cushions in the chairs
38
89000
2000
01:46
we're all sitting on
39
91000
2000
01:48
to the plastic casings of our computers,
40
93000
3000
01:51
our television sets and so on.
41
96000
2000
01:53
So we are tracking
42
98000
2000
01:55
how do these things get from
43
100000
2000
01:57
the products into the ocean,
44
102000
2000
01:59
which is the final sink for them.
45
104000
2000
02:01
And there's quite a complicated pathway for that
46
106000
3000
02:04
because, as these products age,
47
109000
2000
02:06
they get concentrated in dust,
48
111000
2000
02:08
and then they also get thrown out, so they go to the landfills.
49
113000
3000
02:11
They wind up in waste water treatment plants.
50
116000
3000
02:14
As you all know, we throw out billions
51
119000
2000
02:16
of computers and TVs every year.
52
121000
2000
02:18
And those go to e-waste dumps.
53
123000
2000
02:20
And all that gets into surface waters,
54
125000
2000
02:22
eventually reaching the ocean, the final sink.
55
127000
2000
02:24
So, in our study,
56
129000
2000
02:26
we did find quite high levels, as we expected,
57
131000
3000
02:29
of these flame retardants in the harbor seals' bodies.
58
134000
3000
02:32
And we reported this.
59
137000
2000
02:34
It led to a ban of this neuro-toxic flame retardant
60
139000
3000
02:37
called Deca in Maine, where I am based,
61
142000
3000
02:40
and also then a phase-out,
62
145000
2000
02:42
U.S.-wide, at the end of last year.
63
147000
3000
02:45
But we said, well, on the bright side,
64
150000
2000
02:47
our harbor seals at least will not be
65
152000
2000
02:49
bursting into flame anytime soon.
66
154000
3000
02:53
So then I got really curious,
67
158000
2000
02:55
myself, as a toxicologist,
68
160000
2000
02:57
and I donated some blood to my lab
69
162000
2000
02:59
and said, "Okay, let's do it."
70
164000
2000
03:01
Well, we detected 113 different compounds
71
166000
3000
03:04
in my blood.
72
169000
2000
03:06
And I must say, if any of you would have this done,
73
171000
3000
03:09
you'd probably find a similar profile,
74
174000
2000
03:11
or cocktail, as they call it.
75
176000
2000
03:13
But I was the recipient
76
178000
3000
03:16
of a lot of flame retardant material for some reason.
77
181000
3000
03:19
And just to point out the levels --
78
184000
3000
03:22
Americans have 10 to 40 times higher
79
187000
3000
03:25
levels of these compounds in our bodies
80
190000
2000
03:27
than the Europeans.
81
192000
2000
03:29
Why? Because we are flame-retarding everything,
82
194000
3000
03:32
and we have weak regulations
83
197000
2000
03:34
for toxic chemicals.
84
199000
2000
03:36
But lo and behold, I'm one of the high-end individuals.
85
201000
3000
03:39
Lucky me.
86
204000
2000
03:41
But then I thought,
87
206000
2000
03:43
well, in case of a fire, I might be the last one to ignite.
88
208000
3000
03:46
(Laughter)
89
211000
3000
03:49
So anyway, here's the problem --
90
214000
2000
03:51
and it is a problem that we're looking at in the Gulf today --
91
216000
3000
03:54
we're not regulating chemicals in this country properly.
92
219000
3000
03:57
We're hardly regulating them at all.
93
222000
3000
04:00
And we're letting industry run the show.
94
225000
2000
04:02
And Jackie Savitz spoke this morning
95
227000
2000
04:04
about Big Oil
96
229000
2000
04:06
and the propaganda
97
231000
2000
04:08
and how we're all brainwashed
98
233000
3000
04:11
with their, you know, lies and so forth.
99
236000
3000
04:14
Well, Big Chemical
100
239000
2000
04:16
is what we're dealing with here.
101
241000
2000
04:18
And they're allowed to keep trade secrets,
102
243000
2000
04:20
so they don't even give the ingredients out.
103
245000
3000
04:23
Plus they don't give health and safety data,
104
248000
2000
04:25
so, consequently, they cannot be regulated
105
250000
3000
04:28
before they go to market.
106
253000
3000
04:31
So it's a case of innocent until proven guilty.
107
256000
3000
04:34
The burden of proof is not on the producer.
108
259000
3000
04:37
So I then was invited to go
109
262000
2000
04:39
to the Gulf in May.
110
264000
2000
04:41
I went down there on
111
266000
2000
04:43
a preliminary investigation
112
268000
2000
04:45
to look into dispersants
113
270000
2000
04:47
and how they're going into the water column and so forth.
114
272000
2000
04:49
And I was told that I was
115
274000
2000
04:51
the only toxicologist to date
116
276000
3000
04:54
who was dumb enough to get into the water,
117
279000
2000
04:56
but I did.
118
281000
2000
04:58
And we dove in the slick
119
283000
2000
05:00
without even HazMat gear.
120
285000
3000
05:03
And I did get sick.
121
288000
3000
05:06
I got a ferocious sore throat two days later.
122
291000
3000
05:09
I felt like my throat was on fire.
123
294000
3000
05:12
But it did pass.
124
297000
2000
05:14
And what I did see in the water as we went down,
125
299000
3000
05:17
what really shocked me -- and it's haunted me ever since --
126
302000
3000
05:20
because I could see the droplets of oil dispersing.
127
305000
3000
05:23
And as you go down, they're catching all kinds of plankton,
128
308000
3000
05:26
bumping into,
129
311000
2000
05:28
you know, little wisps of life
130
313000
2000
05:30
that are the food for the planktivores,
131
315000
3000
05:33
the herring kind of fish.
132
318000
3000
05:36
And you could just see the web of death
133
321000
2000
05:38
as you go down in the water column.
134
323000
2000
05:40
Well, you know, we got into this
135
325000
2000
05:42
in the beginning
136
327000
2000
05:44
as a trade-off, they say,
137
329000
2000
05:46
between the wetlands versus the ocean depth.
138
331000
3000
05:49
And I didn't agree with that
139
334000
2000
05:51
decision at the time; I still don't.
140
336000
2000
05:53
The decision was to protect the marshes.
141
338000
3000
05:56
When the oil gets into the marshes, you can't get it out.
142
341000
3000
05:59
And as you know, there's been a very weak response,
143
344000
2000
06:01
up until recently,
144
346000
2000
06:03
to actually collect the oil.
145
348000
2000
06:05
It's gotten much more aggressive.
146
350000
2000
06:07
This is an Exxon slide showing what happens,
147
352000
3000
06:10
the scenario and the trade-off.
148
355000
2000
06:12
So this shows oil on the surface.
149
357000
2000
06:14
You can see it getting up into the mangrove,
150
359000
3000
06:17
but it is not harming the corals
151
362000
3000
06:20
or the sea grass, right.
152
365000
2000
06:22
So here we have the other scenario.
153
367000
3000
06:25
If you disperse, the sea grass and the corals
154
370000
2000
06:27
are getting hit pretty hard,
155
372000
2000
06:29
but you're saving the mangrove.
156
374000
2000
06:31
So this, to me, is like going to the eye doctor, okay?
157
376000
3000
06:34
Is it better with one or two?
158
379000
3000
06:37
(Laughter)
159
382000
2000
06:39
The problem is that we have
160
384000
2000
06:41
released so darn much of this stuff,
161
386000
2000
06:43
we're climbing up to two million gallons
162
388000
3000
06:46
very quickly.
163
391000
3000
06:49
And then there's the problem of the plumes.
164
394000
3000
06:52
What plumes?
165
397000
2000
06:54
It turns out there are plumes.
166
399000
3000
06:57
Independent researchers found that.
167
402000
2000
06:59
And then there's the looming,
168
404000
3000
07:02
messy problem of human health,
169
407000
2000
07:04
reported human health effects.
170
409000
2000
07:06
And actually, one of our federal officials
171
411000
2000
07:08
said that it was probably heat stress. So ...
172
413000
3000
07:13
Having been in that water
173
418000
2000
07:15
just for the short time I was there,
174
420000
2000
07:17
I can tell you, it is not heat stress.
175
422000
2000
07:19
There are volumes of volatile
176
424000
2000
07:21
petroleum fumes coming off that water,
177
426000
3000
07:24
plus the Corexit,
178
429000
2000
07:26
which has solvent in it.
179
431000
2000
07:28
So it is not at all rational.
180
433000
3000
07:31
So what do we have? The BP show is going on.
181
436000
3000
07:34
Our officials complained about Corexit,
182
439000
3000
07:37
which is the most toxic
183
442000
3000
07:40
line of dispersants.
184
445000
2000
07:42
But heck, they're still using it,
185
447000
2000
07:44
and they used the most toxic one, the 9527,
186
449000
3000
07:47
until they ran out of supplies.
187
452000
3000
07:50
Now they're on 9500.
188
455000
2000
07:52
9527 had 2-butoxyethanol in it
189
457000
3000
07:55
that causes internal bleeding.
190
460000
3000
07:58
We know that from the Exxon Valdez spill, by the way.
191
463000
3000
08:01
So what we're doing, we're putting compounds
192
466000
3000
08:04
with petroleum solvents onto a petroleum spill.
193
469000
3000
08:07
Does this make sense?
194
472000
2000
08:09
So this is the way it works.
195
474000
2000
08:11
And I want to show you this cute little thing that happens here.
196
476000
3000
08:14
It's a micelle.
197
479000
2000
08:16
Micelles form around the oil.
198
481000
3000
08:19
And what happens first
199
484000
2000
08:21
is the solvents break into the oil,
200
486000
2000
08:23
the lipid membrane,
201
488000
2000
08:25
they let the surfactants in there.
202
490000
2000
08:27
The surfactants -- which are like things
203
492000
2000
08:29
we use on fast food wrappers --
204
494000
2000
08:31
they grab around the droplets of oil,
205
496000
2000
08:33
and they make little, tiny droplets
206
498000
2000
08:35
with nice, little
207
500000
2000
08:37
surfactant edges to them.
208
502000
2000
08:39
The thing to remember about the micelles --
209
504000
3000
08:42
these little floating
210
507000
2000
08:44
globules of toxin --
211
509000
2000
08:46
is they are there to deliver.
212
511000
2000
08:48
They're like the FedEx guys.
213
513000
2000
08:50
And if you're a fish,
214
515000
2000
08:52
and you haven't gotten your glob in the morning,
215
517000
2000
08:54
you're going to get it in the afternoon,
216
519000
2000
08:56
because they've got your number.
217
521000
2000
08:58
So from a toxicology perspective,
218
523000
3000
09:01
this is really awful
219
526000
2000
09:03
because Corexit and the dispersed oil
220
528000
3000
09:06
are much more toxic together
221
531000
2000
09:08
than either alone.
222
533000
2000
09:10
And usually the exposure
223
535000
2000
09:12
is a combined exposure.
224
537000
2000
09:14
The dispersants -- as I was saying --
225
539000
3000
09:17
their job is to break down
226
542000
2000
09:19
the lipid membrane.
227
544000
2000
09:21
The solvents in them do that very efficiently.
228
546000
3000
09:24
So they break down
229
549000
2000
09:26
lipid membranes in our body,
230
551000
2000
09:28
starting with cells of the skin,
231
553000
2000
09:30
the cells of organs.
232
555000
2000
09:32
So it actually hastens
233
557000
2000
09:34
oil getting into the body
234
559000
2000
09:36
easily and readily.
235
561000
2000
09:38
Oil contains hundreds of hydrocarbon compounds
236
563000
3000
09:41
and other compounds
237
566000
2000
09:43
that are toxic to every organ in the body.
238
568000
3000
09:46
And so with the dispersants combined,
239
571000
2000
09:48
you have this very synergistic
240
573000
2000
09:50
combined toxicity.
241
575000
3000
09:53
Corexit also contains petroleum solvents
242
578000
2000
09:55
and many other toxic compounds.
243
580000
2000
09:57
And I'm part of a chat group,
244
582000
2000
09:59
which is a national group
245
584000
3000
10:02
of toxicologists and chemists
246
587000
3000
10:05
that are, you know, basically
247
590000
2000
10:07
turning cartwheels trying to figure out what's in this stuff,
248
592000
3000
10:10
and what is it doing and what are the interactions
249
595000
3000
10:13
of these chemicals, most of which we don't know,
250
598000
3000
10:16
and what are their byproducts,
251
601000
2000
10:18
which are usually more toxic than the parent compound.
252
603000
3000
10:21
So we did find that Corexit 9500
253
606000
2000
10:23
contains heavy metals, arsenic and chromium --
254
608000
3000
10:26
arsenic at high enough levels
255
611000
3000
10:29
to have cancer-causing effects.
256
614000
3000
10:33
So this is what we have to look at,
257
618000
3000
10:36
these, you know, ridiculous safety data sheets,
258
621000
3000
10:39
which have nothing on them much.
259
624000
3000
10:42
And now they were forced to release the ultimate list
260
627000
3000
10:45
of everything that's in Corexit.
261
630000
3000
10:48
And guess what,
262
633000
2000
10:50
tons of stuff is missing.
263
635000
2000
10:52
Derivatives, derivatives, these are whole big groups
264
637000
3000
10:55
of many, many compounds, these sorbitans.
265
640000
3000
10:58
And then you get down to the petroleum distillates,
266
643000
2000
11:00
which are the solvents,
267
645000
2000
11:02
hundreds of them.
268
647000
2000
11:04
They are not identified. And why?
269
649000
3000
11:07
Trade secrets again.
270
652000
2000
11:09
BP's running the show,
271
654000
2000
11:11
and the Nalco company, this is all they have to do.
272
656000
3000
11:14
So far these ingredients have not been released,
273
659000
3000
11:17
and toxicologists are actually going nuts
274
662000
3000
11:20
because we cannot predict with certainty
275
665000
3000
11:23
what the interactions
276
668000
2000
11:25
and toxic results are going to be.
277
670000
2000
11:27
But we do have quite a lot at risk
278
672000
2000
11:29
down there, as we all know,
279
674000
2000
11:31
the 33 wildlife refuges,
280
676000
3000
11:34
so much wildlife
281
679000
2000
11:36
and fish and diversity.
282
681000
2000
11:38
So we know from previous spills.
283
683000
2000
11:40
And then part of this is just
284
685000
2000
11:42
part of my bad dreams.
285
687000
2000
11:44
And I appreciate being able
286
689000
2000
11:46
to vent some of my
287
691000
2000
11:48
anguish upon you.
288
693000
2000
11:50
What we do know is that the corals are going to get hit hard.
289
695000
3000
11:54
And this is a study that was done
290
699000
2000
11:56
on the Australian coast,
291
701000
2000
11:58
the coast of Tasmania.
292
703000
3000
12:01
Corals are, you know, the home to
293
706000
2000
12:03
about a quarter of all marine species.
294
708000
2000
12:05
And with the Corexit
295
710000
3000
12:08
and the oil,
296
713000
2000
12:10
there's zero percent fertilization.
297
715000
3000
12:13
With oil alone, there's 98 percent fertilization.
298
718000
3000
12:16
So they're a very sensitive species
299
721000
2000
12:18
to this combo.
300
723000
2000
12:20
Here's another group.
301
725000
2000
12:22
I could see myself easily in the water column.
302
727000
3000
12:25
The plankton and the plankton eaters,
303
730000
2000
12:27
you know, these are the little herring fish
304
732000
2000
12:29
that go through the water column with their mouths open,
305
734000
3000
12:32
feeding indiscriminately
306
737000
2000
12:34
and just lapping up
307
739000
2000
12:36
this brown pudding of toxic stuff.
308
741000
3000
12:40
And we do know from other studies
309
745000
2000
12:42
that this is a highly toxic mixture.
310
747000
2000
12:44
See the oil and Corexit is causing death
311
749000
3000
12:47
at a much, much lower dose
312
752000
3000
12:50
than oil alone.
313
755000
2000
12:52
That's probably as far as what we do know
314
757000
2000
12:54
about toxic effects.
315
759000
2000
12:56
But my bad dreams go like this.
316
761000
3000
12:59
The piscivorous fish,
317
764000
2000
13:01
the cobia, grouper, amberjacks, those big fish,
318
766000
3000
13:04
also the tuna and sharks,
319
769000
2000
13:06
are going to hit by this.
320
771000
2000
13:08
And the gills are quite sensitive.
321
773000
2000
13:10
The respiratory system is very sensitive.
322
775000
2000
13:12
Think about it with
323
777000
2000
13:14
the Corexit hitting the membranes,
324
779000
3000
13:17
and it will clog up the gills,
325
782000
3000
13:20
and then these animals are going to be
326
785000
2000
13:22
getting something like what you call
327
787000
2000
13:24
chemical pneumonia,
328
789000
2000
13:26
trying to aspirate the compounds.
329
791000
3000
13:29
It also will cause internal bleeding
330
794000
2000
13:31
upon ingestion.
331
796000
2000
13:33
I'm very worried about the air-breathing mammals because I study them,
332
798000
3000
13:36
but also, the way their going to be exposed
333
801000
2000
13:38
is every time they come to the surface to take a breath,
334
803000
3000
13:41
they're going to inhale these volatile fumes.
335
806000
3000
13:44
And what does happen with that eventually
336
809000
2000
13:46
is pneumonia sets in
337
811000
3000
13:49
and liver, kidney, brain damage.
338
814000
3000
13:52
The Corexit
339
817000
2000
13:54
is transporting the oil
340
819000
2000
13:56
into every membrane
341
821000
2000
13:58
and every system of the body.
342
823000
2000
14:00
And you're having
343
825000
2000
14:02
a lot of different unpleasant effects,
344
827000
2000
14:04
but burns to the eyes and mouth,
345
829000
3000
14:07
skin ulcers, lesions.
346
832000
2000
14:09
And I think, personally,
347
834000
2000
14:11
that we have not begun to see
348
836000
2000
14:13
the impacts of this spill
349
838000
2000
14:15
on the wildlife of the Gulf.
350
840000
2000
14:17
We started hypothesizing:
351
842000
2000
14:19
what do we know?
352
844000
2000
14:21
what do with think would be a trophic cascade?
353
846000
2000
14:23
which means that somebody gets wiped out,
354
848000
2000
14:25
and then everything above
355
850000
2000
14:27
that's eating those guys will crash.
356
852000
2000
14:29
So our thought was --
357
854000
3000
14:32
this is a simple thinking process, but ...
358
857000
2000
14:34
obviously the plankton, the planktivores,
359
859000
3000
14:37
and that's about as far as we got.
360
862000
2000
14:39
And then it turns out we're not very good at figuring this stuff out.
361
864000
3000
14:42
This is what the Exxon Valdez scientists thought would happen,
362
867000
3000
14:45
this trophic cascade
363
870000
2000
14:47
where you lose the kelp and the herring
364
872000
2000
14:49
and other fishes and going up.
365
874000
2000
14:51
They thought that eventually the killer whale
366
876000
2000
14:53
would be at the top of this cascade.
367
878000
2000
14:55
And then here's what really happened,
368
880000
2000
14:57
much more complicated, much more specific.
369
882000
3000
15:00
Actually the kelp
370
885000
2000
15:02
and the barnacles that attach to the rock
371
887000
3000
15:05
were decimated by the combination
372
890000
2000
15:07
of Corexit and the oil.
373
892000
3000
15:11
They were replaced by invasive species,
374
896000
3000
15:14
which had less holding power to the rock.
375
899000
3000
15:17
Storms came along.
376
902000
2000
15:19
They ripped out of the rock.
377
904000
2000
15:21
And this was the entire food web for the sea ducks.
378
906000
3000
15:24
And as you know, we lost about 300,000 sea ducks
379
909000
3000
15:27
from the Exxon Valdez spill,
380
912000
2000
15:29
and they haven't come back.
381
914000
3000
15:32
So we are launching
382
917000
2000
15:34
an independent study.
383
919000
2000
15:36
And by independent, I do not mean alone;
384
921000
3000
15:39
I mean independent in the sense
385
924000
2000
15:41
of not tied to
386
926000
3000
15:44
the kind of crime-scene secrecy
387
929000
2000
15:46
that's going on in the Gulf now.
388
931000
2000
15:48
But we are actually going to be assessing toxic impacts,
389
933000
3000
15:51
but we need lots and lots of partners
390
936000
2000
15:53
to do this intelligently.
391
938000
2000
15:55
We have some of the partners lined up.
392
940000
2000
15:57
And Dave Gallo signed on.
393
942000
2000
15:59
Sylvia's in here.
394
944000
3000
16:02
And we hope that some of you will help us.
395
947000
3000
16:05
My question to you is: why shouldn't we know?
396
950000
2000
16:07
Don't we have the right to know?
397
952000
2000
16:09
Surely we have the right to learn
398
954000
3000
16:12
what loss we are going through in the Gulf.
399
957000
3000
16:15
And my wish would be --
400
960000
3000
16:18
for the gulf prize -- would be
401
963000
2000
16:20
that we have the truth.
402
965000
3000
16:23
Whatever it is, please let us have the truth.
403
968000
3000
16:26
And to get there,
404
971000
2000
16:28
we need to do the assessment.
405
973000
3000
16:31
So I appreciate being here. Thank you.
406
976000
2000
16:33
(Applause)
407
978000
3000

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Susan Shaw - Marine toxicologist
Susan Shaw is an internationally recognized marine toxicologist, author and explorer.

Why you should listen

For two decades, Susan Shaw has investigated the effects of environmental chemicals in marine animals. She is credited as the first scientist to show that flame-retardant chemicals in consumer products have contaminated marine mammals and commercially important fish stocks in the northwest Atlantic Ocean.

An outspoken and influential voice on ocean pollution, Shaw dove in the Gulf oil slick in May and observed first-hand how oil and dispersants are impacting life in the water column. The experience prompted her to call for a collaborative, Gulf-wide effort to track effects as the toxins ripple through the food web. She was instrumental in creating the Consensus Statement opposing further use of dispersants in the Gulf.

Shaw serves on the International Panel on Chemical Pollution, a select group of scientists urging policymakers to improve management of toxic chemicals. She travels throughout the US, Europe and Asia as a speaker on the ocean crisis and chemical pollution.

More profile about the speaker
Susan Shaw | Speaker | TED.com

Data provided by TED.

This site was created in May 2015 and the last update was on January 12, 2020. It will no longer be updated.

We are currently creating a new site called "eng.lish.video" and would be grateful if you could access it.

If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to write comments in your language on the contact form.

Privacy Policy

Developer's Blog

Buy Me A Coffee