Amy Adele Hasinoff: How to practice safe sexting
에이미 아델 하신오프(Amy Adele Hasinoff): 안전하게 섹스팅 즐기기
Amy Adele Hasinoff studies gender, sexuality, privacy and consent in new media. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
to talk about sex for a long time.
이용해 성에 관한 이야기를 했어요.
야한 사진 등을 보냈죠.
with a man that she met over the telegraph
야반도주한 여자아이도 있었어요.
and I am a sexting expert.
전 섹스팅 전문가예요
I think you do too.
여러분도 아실 거예요.
the media attention to it began in 2008.
주목하자 저도 연구하기 시작했어요.
panic about sexting.
주제로 책도 냈어요.
about the wrong thing.
걱정을 하고 있어요.
sexting from happening entirely.
what's the problem with sexting?
왜 섹스팅이 문제가 되는 거죠?
that you may not be into,
그것에 열광하는 사람도 많아요.
like anything that's fun,
다른 재밌는 취미와 마찬가지로요.
to someone who doesn't want to receive it,
보내지 않으면
발생하는 경우는
private images of others
사적인 사진을 공유할 때예요.
is think a lot more about digital privacy.
생각해보아야 합니다.
are thinking about sexting
동의에 대해 생각해보지 않은 채로
about consent at all.
생각하고 있습니다.
criminalize teen sexting?
불법인 거 아시나요?
it counts as child pornography,
아동포르노에 해당되기 때문에
and shared it willingly.
아닌지는 중요치 않아요.
bizarre legal situation
can legally have sex in most US states
사진을 찍는 건 불법인
passing sexting misdemeanor laws
통과시키려는 노력을 하기도 했죠.
문제를 반복할 뿐이었어요.
make consensual sexting illegal.
여전히 불법이었으니까요.
to try to address privacy violations.
말이 안 됩니다.
by just making dating completely illegal.
데이트 자체를 완전히 불법화하자."
but can you guess who does?
않아요. 누가 구속되게요?
by their partner's parents.
좋아하지 않습니다.
racism or homophobia.
동성애혐모 때문이기도 하죠.
of course, smart enough
십대를 아동포르노 혐의로
against teenagers, but some do.
at the University of New Hampshire
possession arrests are teens,
사람 중 7%가 10대라고 합니다.
섹스팅인데도 말이죠.
the same thing as teen sexting.
are also responding to sexting
합의라는 것은 무시한 채
too much about consent.
just don't do it.
"그냥 하지 말거라"
there are serious legal risks
심각한 법적 위험이 있고
for privacy violations.
as you were told, right?
고분고분 들으셨을 거예요, 맞죠?
my kid would never sext.
안 하겠지라고 생각하실 겁니다.
may not be sexting
섹스팅을 안 할지도 모릅니다.
섹스팅하는 아이는
odds are they will be sexting.
이걸 할 확률도 높아져요.
above 50 percent for 18- to 24-year-olds.
18-24세의 경우는 50%이상이에요.
아무 문제도 생기지 않아요.
isn't sexting just so dangerous, though?
"섹스팅 자체가 위험한 거 아니야?"
두고 오지 않는 거하고 비슷한 거예요.
leave your wallet on a park bench
if you do that, right?
누가 훔쳐갔을거라 생각하시겠죠.
at your boyfriend's house.
놓고 오는 것과 같다고요.
these privacy violations,
of our private information.
raises privacy concerns.
사생활에 대한 우려가 제기됩니다.
major debates about privacy
최신인 기술이 등장했을 때
that were relatively new at the time.
대규모 논쟁이 일어났죠.
people were worried about cameras,
신문의 가십란과,
more portable than ever before,
would capture information about them,
and widely disseminate it.
널리 퍼뜨릴까봐 걱정된거죠.
now with social media and drone cameras,
걱정하는 것과 동일합니다.
can amplify and bring out
우리의 나쁜 행동이나 단점을
with a dangerous new technology.
이런 상황에 처해본 적 있잖아요.
모델 T 차량을 선보였고,
it looks so safe, right?
보기엔 안전한 것 같은데, 그렇죠?
was to try to change drivers' behavior,
운전자의 행동을 바꾸는 거였어요.
and enforced them through fines.
벌금을 물어 지키게 만들었죠.
of the car itself is not just neutral.
않다는 걸 깨달았어요.
shatter-resistant windshields.
비산방지 앞유리를 만듭니다.
came together over time
3개 영역 힘을 합쳐
that a new technology causes.
해결하기 위해 나섰죠.
with digital privacy.
똑같이 해결할 수 있습니다.
돌아가서 말이죠.
your private information,
퍼트리기 전에
comes from anti-rape activists
합의가 있어야 한다고 주장하는
for every sexual act.
파생된 거예요.
for consent in a lot of other areas.
기준이 상당히 높아요.
consenting to that medical procedure.
확실히 해둬야 하죠.
like with an iTunes Terms of Service
맨 밑으로 스크롤 내리고
and you're like, agree, agree, whatever.
것과는 달라요.
we can have better privacy laws.
사생활 보호법을 만들 수 있어요.
that many protections.
is a terrible person,
and upload them to a porn site.
포르노 사이트에 올려버릴 수도 있죠.
to get those images taken down.
정말 애를 먹죠.
if you took the images of yourself
찍는 게 더 나아요.
file a copyright claim.
violates your privacy,
or a company or the NSA,
혹은 국정원일지라도
that digital privacy is just impossible.
승소하긴 어렵지만요.
to punish anyone for violating it.
처벌하진 않으려고 합니다.
asking me all the time,
the line between public and private
사적인건지와 공적인건지의
공적인 것은 아닙니다.
is not just automatically public.
Helen Nissenbaum tells us,
어떤 종류든 보호해주는
of information that's private,
if it's digital or not.
없다고 말합니다.
just share them with anyone.
is held in digital databases,
디지털 데이터베이스에 저장돼 있지만
just post your purchase history online.
공개할 수 없습니다.
privacy violations after they happen,
사후 대응을 할 수 있겠지만
we can all do is make personal changes
가장 쉬운 방법 하나는
해주는 거예요.
individual responsibility.
and update your privacy settings.
you wouldn't want the entire world to see.
절대 공유하지 말라고 합니다.
with people we trust all day, every day.
매일 정보를 공유해요.
Janet Vertesi argues,
they're not just personal,
그냥 개인적인 것이 아니라
that's really easy
you share anyone else's information.
허락받기 시작하는 거예요.
of someone online, ask for permission.
싶으시면 허락을 받으세요.
someone's nude selfie,
help us protect each other's privacy,
많은 도움이 됩니다.
on board as well.
incentive to help protect our privacy
노력할 동기가 없습니다.
depend on us sharing everything
사람들이 최대한 많은 이들과
to anyone that you want.
누구에게든 보낼 수 있어요.
if that image was forwardable or not?
결정권이 제게 있게 된다면요?
have my permission to send this image out.
허락하지 않았다는 걸 알 수 있겠죠.
to protect copyright.
항상 이런 일들을 하죠.
send it out to as many people as you want.
많은 사람들과 공유해서는 안되죠.
그렇게 하는 건 어떨까요?
that tech companies add these protections
이런 보호 장치가 자동으로
as the default.
추가해달라고 요구할 수 있어요.
the color of your car,
about digital privacy and consent,
더 고민하지 않으면
for the sake of her privacy.
제니퍼라고 할게요.
with her high school boyfriend,
고등학교 남친과 공유했죠.
around the entire school.
사진을 학교 전체에 뿌렸어요.
수치심을 느꼈지만
her classmates harassed her.
괴롭힘을 당했어요.
and her grades dropped.
성적은 떨어졌어요.
to end her own life.
that she could trust.
equivalent to child pornography.
끔찍한 범죄를 저질렀다고 합니다.
this nude image of herself,
horrible, shameful thing.
짓이라며 제니퍼를 비난합니다.
is impossible in digital media,
불가능하다고 가정하게 되면
her boyfriend's bad, bad behavior.
변명해주는 꼴이 될 뿐이죠.
to victims of privacy violations,
피해자에게 이렇게 말합니다.
what to say instead, try this.
고민이라면 이렇게 해보세요.
who broke their leg skiing.
다리가 부러졌다고 상상해보세요.
and it didn't end well.
끝이 좋지 않았어요
not going to be the jerk who says,
멍청이처럼 이렇게 말하진 않겠죠.
have gone skiing then."
of privacy violations
괴롭힘, 처벌이 아니라
harassment or punishment.
알 수 있을 거예요.
and we can prevent some privacy violations
기술적 변화를 통해
individual and technological changes.
사생활 침해를 예방할 수 있어요.
the issue is digital privacy.
디지털 사생활이 문제이니까요.
of a privacy violation comes up to you,
여러분에게 오거든
let's do this instead:
이렇게 해보세요.
about digital privacy,
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Amy Adele Hasinoff - Communications researcherAmy Adele Hasinoff studies gender, sexuality, privacy and consent in new media.
Why you should listen
Amy Adele Hasinoff investigates how we think about communication technologies as both the cause of and solution to social problems. She wrote a book, Sexting Panic, about the well-intentioned but problematic responses to sexting in mass media, law and education. The National Communication Association described it as "[T]he rare book that advances scholarly conversations while also promising to enrich family conversations around the dinner table."
Hasinoff is an Assistant Professor in the communication department at the University of Colorado Denver. She publishes regularly in scholarly journals and books and wrote an op-ed about sexting for the New York Times.
Amy Adele Hasinoff | Speaker | TED.com