TEDGlobal 2009
Dan Pink: The puzzle of motivation
Filmed:
Readability: 4
25,352,736 views
Career analyst Dan Pink examines the puzzle of motivation, starting with a fact that social scientists know but most managers don't: Traditional rewards aren't always as effective as we think. Listen for illuminating stories -- and maybe, a way forward.
Dan Pink - Career analyst
Bidding adieu to his last "real job" as Al Gore's speechwriter, Dan Pink went freelance to spark a right-brain revolution in the career marketplace. Full bio
Bidding adieu to his last "real job" as Al Gore's speechwriter, Dan Pink went freelance to spark a right-brain revolution in the career marketplace. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:12
I need to make a confession at the outset here.
0
0
4000
00:16
A little over 20 years ago
1
4000
3000
00:19
I did something that I regret,
2
7000
2000
00:21
something that I'm not particularly proud of,
3
9000
4000
00:25
something that, in many ways, I wish no one would ever know,
4
13000
3000
00:28
but here I feel kind of obliged to reveal.
5
16000
4000
00:32
(Laughter)
6
20000
2000
00:34
In the late 1980s,
7
22000
2000
00:36
in a moment of youthful indiscretion,
8
24000
3000
00:39
I went to law school.
9
27000
2000
00:41
(Laughter)
10
29000
4000
00:45
Now, in America law is a professional degree:
11
33000
3000
00:48
you get your university degree, then you go on to law school.
12
36000
2000
00:50
And when I got to law school,
13
38000
3000
00:53
I didn't do very well.
14
41000
2000
00:55
To put it mildly, I didn't do very well.
15
43000
2000
00:57
I, in fact, graduated in the part of my law school class
16
45000
3000
01:00
that made the top 90 percent possible.
17
48000
4000
01:04
(Laughter)
18
52000
4000
01:08
Thank you.
19
56000
3000
01:11
I never practiced law a day in my life;
20
59000
3000
01:14
I pretty much wasn't allowed to.
21
62000
2000
01:16
(Laughter)
22
64000
3000
01:19
But today, against my better judgment,
23
67000
3000
01:22
against the advice of my own wife,
24
70000
3000
01:25
I want to try to dust off some of those legal skills --
25
73000
4000
01:29
what's left of those legal skills.
26
77000
2000
01:31
I don't want to tell you a story.
27
79000
3000
01:34
I want to make a case.
28
82000
2000
01:36
I want to make a hard-headed, evidence-based,
29
84000
4000
01:40
dare I say lawyerly case,
30
88000
3000
01:43
for rethinking how we run our businesses.
31
91000
4000
01:47
So, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, take a look at this.
32
95000
4000
01:51
This is called the candle problem.
33
99000
2000
01:53
Some of you might have seen this before.
34
101000
2000
01:55
It's created in 1945
35
103000
2000
01:57
by a psychologist named Karl Duncker.
36
105000
2000
01:59
Karl Duncker created this experiment
37
107000
2000
02:01
that is used in a whole variety of experiments in behavioral science.
38
109000
3000
02:04
And here's how it works. Suppose I'm the experimenter.
39
112000
3000
02:07
I bring you into a room. I give you a candle,
40
115000
4000
02:11
some thumbtacks and some matches.
41
119000
2000
02:13
And I say to you, "Your job
42
121000
2000
02:15
is to attach the candle to the wall
43
123000
2000
02:17
so the wax doesn't drip onto the table." Now what would you do?
44
125000
4000
02:21
Now many people begin trying to thumbtack the candle to the wall.
45
129000
4000
02:25
Doesn't work.
46
133000
2000
02:27
Somebody, some people -- and I saw somebody
47
135000
2000
02:29
kind of make the motion over here --
48
137000
2000
02:31
some people have a great idea where they
49
139000
2000
02:33
light the match, melt the side of the candle, try to adhere it to the wall.
50
141000
4000
02:37
It's an awesome idea. Doesn't work.
51
145000
3000
02:40
And eventually, after five or 10 minutes,
52
148000
3000
02:43
most people figure out the solution,
53
151000
2000
02:45
which you can see here.
54
153000
2000
02:47
The key is to overcome what's called functional fixedness.
55
155000
3000
02:50
You look at that box and you see it only as a receptacle for the tacks.
56
158000
4000
02:54
But it can also have this other function,
57
162000
2000
02:56
as a platform for the candle. The candle problem.
58
164000
4000
03:00
Now I want to tell you about an experiment
59
168000
2000
03:02
using the candle problem,
60
170000
2000
03:04
done by a scientist named Sam Glucksberg,
61
172000
2000
03:06
who is now at Princeton University in the U.S.
62
174000
2000
03:08
This shows the power of incentives.
63
176000
4000
03:12
Here's what he did. He gathered his participants.
64
180000
2000
03:14
And he said, "I'm going to time you. How quickly you can solve this problem?"
65
182000
3000
03:17
To one group he said,
66
185000
2000
03:19
"I'm going to time you to establish norms,
67
187000
3000
03:22
averages for how long it typically takes
68
190000
2000
03:24
someone to solve this sort of problem."
69
192000
2000
03:26
To the second group he offered rewards.
70
194000
3000
03:29
He said, "If you're in the top 25 percent of the fastest times,
71
197000
4000
03:33
you get five dollars.
72
201000
3000
03:36
If you're the fastest of everyone we're testing here today,
73
204000
3000
03:39
you get 20 dollars."
74
207000
2000
03:41
Now this is several years ago. Adjusted for inflation,
75
209000
3000
03:44
it's a decent sum of money for a few minutes of work.
76
212000
2000
03:46
It's a nice motivator.
77
214000
2000
03:48
Question: How much faster
78
216000
3000
03:51
did this group solve the problem?
79
219000
2000
03:53
Answer: It took them, on average,
80
221000
3000
03:56
three and a half minutes longer.
81
224000
4000
04:00
Three and a half minutes longer. Now this makes no sense right?
82
228000
3000
04:03
I mean, I'm an American. I believe in free markets.
83
231000
3000
04:06
That's not how it's supposed to work. Right?
84
234000
3000
04:09
(Laughter)
85
237000
1000
04:10
If you want people to perform better,
86
238000
2000
04:12
you reward them. Right?
87
240000
2000
04:14
Bonuses, commissions, their own reality show.
88
242000
3000
04:17
Incentivize them. That's how business works.
89
245000
4000
04:21
But that's not happening here.
90
249000
2000
04:23
You've got an incentive designed to
91
251000
2000
04:25
sharpen thinking and accelerate creativity,
92
253000
4000
04:29
and it does just the opposite.
93
257000
2000
04:31
It dulls thinking and blocks creativity.
94
259000
3000
04:34
And what's interesting about this experiment is that it's not an aberration.
95
262000
3000
04:37
This has been replicated over and over
96
265000
3000
04:40
and over again, for nearly 40 years.
97
268000
3000
04:43
These contingent motivators --
98
271000
3000
04:46
if you do this, then you get that --
99
274000
2000
04:48
work in some circumstances.
100
276000
2000
04:50
But for a lot of tasks, they actually either don't work
101
278000
3000
04:53
or, often, they do harm.
102
281000
3000
04:56
This is one of the most robust findings
103
284000
4000
05:00
in social science,
104
288000
3000
05:03
and also one of the most ignored.
105
291000
2000
05:05
I spent the last couple of years looking at the science of
106
293000
2000
05:07
human motivation,
107
295000
2000
05:09
particularly the dynamics of extrinsic motivators
108
297000
2000
05:11
and intrinsic motivators.
109
299000
2000
05:13
And I'm telling you, it's not even close.
110
301000
2000
05:15
If you look at the science, there is a mismatch
111
303000
2000
05:17
between what science knows and what business does.
112
305000
4000
05:21
And what's alarming here is that our business operating system --
113
309000
3000
05:24
think of the set of assumptions and protocols beneath our businesses,
114
312000
3000
05:27
how we motivate people, how we apply our human resources --
115
315000
5000
05:32
it's built entirely around these extrinsic motivators,
116
320000
3000
05:35
around carrots and sticks.
117
323000
2000
05:37
That's actually fine for many kinds of 20th century tasks.
118
325000
4000
05:41
But for 21st century tasks,
119
329000
2000
05:43
that mechanistic, reward-and-punishment approach
120
331000
4000
05:47
doesn't work, often doesn't work, and often does harm.
121
335000
4000
05:51
Let me show you what I mean.
122
339000
2000
05:53
So Glucksberg did another experiment similar to this
123
341000
3000
05:56
where he presented the problem in a slightly different way,
124
344000
2000
05:58
like this up here. Okay?
125
346000
3000
06:01
Attach the candle to the wall so the wax doesn't drip onto the table.
126
349000
2000
06:03
Same deal. You: we're timing for norms.
127
351000
3000
06:06
You: we're incentivizing.
128
354000
3000
06:09
What happened this time?
129
357000
2000
06:11
This time, the incentivized group
130
359000
2000
06:13
kicked the other group's butt.
131
361000
4000
06:17
Why? Because when the tacks are out of the box,
132
365000
4000
06:21
it's pretty easy isn't it?
133
369000
4000
06:25
(Laughter)
134
373000
2000
06:27
If-then rewards work really well
135
375000
3000
06:30
for those sorts of tasks,
136
378000
3000
06:33
where there is a simple set of rules and a clear destination
137
381000
2000
06:35
to go to.
138
383000
2000
06:37
Rewards, by their very nature,
139
385000
2000
06:39
narrow our focus, concentrate the mind;
140
387000
2000
06:41
that's why they work in so many cases.
141
389000
2000
06:43
And so, for tasks like this,
142
391000
2000
06:45
a narrow focus, where you just see the goal right there,
143
393000
3000
06:48
zoom straight ahead to it,
144
396000
2000
06:50
they work really well.
145
398000
2000
06:52
But for the real candle problem,
146
400000
2000
06:54
you don't want to be looking like this.
147
402000
2000
06:56
The solution is not over here. The solution is on the periphery.
148
404000
2000
06:58
You want to be looking around.
149
406000
2000
07:00
That reward actually narrows our focus
150
408000
2000
07:02
and restricts our possibility.
151
410000
2000
07:04
Let me tell you why this is so important.
152
412000
3000
07:07
In western Europe,
153
415000
2000
07:09
in many parts of Asia,
154
417000
2000
07:11
in North America, in Australia,
155
419000
3000
07:14
white-collar workers are doing less of
156
422000
2000
07:16
this kind of work,
157
424000
2000
07:18
and more of this kind of work.
158
426000
4000
07:22
That routine, rule-based, left-brain work --
159
430000
3000
07:25
certain kinds of accounting, certain kinds of financial analysis,
160
433000
2000
07:27
certain kinds of computer programming --
161
435000
2000
07:29
has become fairly easy to outsource,
162
437000
2000
07:31
fairly easy to automate.
163
439000
2000
07:33
Software can do it faster.
164
441000
3000
07:36
Low-cost providers around the world can do it cheaper.
165
444000
2000
07:38
So what really matters are the more right-brained
166
446000
4000
07:42
creative, conceptual kinds of abilities.
167
450000
3000
07:45
Think about your own work.
168
453000
3000
07:48
Think about your own work.
169
456000
3000
07:51
Are the problems that you face, or even the problems
170
459000
2000
07:53
we've been talking about here,
171
461000
2000
07:55
are those kinds of problems -- do they have a clear set of rules,
172
463000
2000
07:57
and a single solution? No.
173
465000
3000
08:00
The rules are mystifying.
174
468000
2000
08:02
The solution, if it exists at all,
175
470000
2000
08:04
is surprising and not obvious.
176
472000
3000
08:07
Everybody in this room
177
475000
2000
08:09
is dealing with their own version
178
477000
3000
08:12
of the candle problem.
179
480000
2000
08:14
And for candle problems of any kind,
180
482000
3000
08:17
in any field,
181
485000
2000
08:19
those if-then rewards,
182
487000
3000
08:22
the things around which we've built so many of our businesses,
183
490000
4000
08:26
don't work.
184
494000
2000
08:28
Now, I mean it makes me crazy.
185
496000
2000
08:30
And this is not -- here's the thing.
186
498000
2000
08:32
This is not a feeling.
187
500000
3000
08:35
Okay? I'm a lawyer; I don't believe in feelings.
188
503000
3000
08:38
This is not a philosophy.
189
506000
4000
08:42
I'm an American; I don't believe in philosophy.
190
510000
2000
08:44
(Laughter)
191
512000
3000
08:47
This is a fact --
192
515000
3000
08:50
or, as we say in my hometown of Washington, D.C.,
193
518000
2000
08:52
a true fact.
194
520000
2000
08:54
(Laughter)
195
522000
2000
08:56
(Applause)
196
524000
4000
09:00
Let me give you an example of what I mean.
197
528000
2000
09:02
Let me marshal the evidence here,
198
530000
2000
09:04
because I'm not telling you a story, I'm making a case.
199
532000
2000
09:06
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, some evidence:
200
534000
2000
09:08
Dan Ariely, one of the great economists of our time,
201
536000
3000
09:11
he and three colleagues, did a study of some MIT students.
202
539000
4000
09:15
They gave these MIT students a bunch of games,
203
543000
3000
09:18
games that involved creativity,
204
546000
2000
09:20
and motor skills, and concentration.
205
548000
2000
09:22
And the offered them, for performance,
206
550000
2000
09:24
three levels of rewards:
207
552000
2000
09:26
small reward, medium reward, large reward.
208
554000
5000
09:31
Okay? If you do really well you get the large reward, on down.
209
559000
4000
09:35
What happened? As long as the task involved only mechanical skill
210
563000
4000
09:39
bonuses worked as they would be expected:
211
567000
2000
09:41
the higher the pay, the better the performance.
212
569000
4000
09:45
Okay? But one the task called for
213
573000
2000
09:47
even rudimentary cognitive skill,
214
575000
4000
09:51
a larger reward led to poorer performance.
215
579000
5000
09:56
Then they said,
216
584000
2000
09:58
"Okay let's see if there's any cultural bias here.
217
586000
2000
10:00
Lets go to Madurai, India and test this."
218
588000
2000
10:02
Standard of living is lower.
219
590000
2000
10:04
In Madurai, a reward that is modest in North American standards,
220
592000
3000
10:07
is more meaningful there.
221
595000
3000
10:10
Same deal. A bunch of games, three levels of rewards.
222
598000
3000
10:13
What happens?
223
601000
2000
10:15
People offered the medium level of rewards
224
603000
3000
10:18
did no better than people offered the small rewards.
225
606000
3000
10:21
But this time, people offered the highest rewards,
226
609000
4000
10:25
they did the worst of all.
227
613000
4000
10:29
In eight of the nine tasks we examined across three experiments,
228
617000
3000
10:32
higher incentives led to worse performance.
229
620000
5000
10:37
Is this some kind of touchy-feely
230
625000
3000
10:40
socialist conspiracy going on here?
231
628000
3000
10:43
No. These are economists from MIT,
232
631000
3000
10:46
from Carnegie Mellon, from the University of Chicago.
233
634000
3000
10:49
And do you know who sponsored this research?
234
637000
2000
10:51
The Federal Reserve Bank of the United States.
235
639000
4000
10:55
That's the American experience.
236
643000
2000
10:57
Let's go across the pond to the London School of Economics --
237
645000
3000
11:00
LSE, London School of Economics,
238
648000
3000
11:03
alma mater of 11 Nobel Laureates in economics.
239
651000
3000
11:06
Training ground for great economic thinkers
240
654000
3000
11:09
like George Soros, and Friedrich Hayek,
241
657000
3000
11:12
and Mick Jagger. (Laughter)
242
660000
2000
11:14
Last month, just last month,
243
662000
4000
11:18
economists at LSE looked at 51 studies
244
666000
3000
11:21
of pay-for-performance plans, inside of companies.
245
669000
3000
11:24
Here's what the economists there said: "We find that financial incentives
246
672000
3000
11:27
can result in a negative impact on overall performance."
247
675000
6000
11:33
There is a mismatch between what science knows
248
681000
3000
11:36
and what business does.
249
684000
2000
11:38
And what worries me, as we stand here in the rubble
250
686000
3000
11:41
of the economic collapse,
251
689000
2000
11:43
is that too many organizations
252
691000
2000
11:45
are making their decisions,
253
693000
2000
11:47
their policies about talent and people,
254
695000
2000
11:49
based on assumptions that are outdated, unexamined,
255
697000
6000
11:55
and rooted more in folklore than in science.
256
703000
3000
11:58
And if we really want to get out of this economic mess,
257
706000
3000
12:01
and if we really want high performance on those
258
709000
2000
12:03
definitional tasks of the 21st century,
259
711000
2000
12:05
the solution is not to do more of the wrong things,
260
713000
6000
12:11
to entice people with a sweeter carrot,
261
719000
3000
12:14
or threaten them with a sharper stick.
262
722000
2000
12:16
We need a whole new approach.
263
724000
2000
12:18
And the good news about all of this is that the scientists
264
726000
2000
12:20
who've been studying motivation have given us this new approach.
265
728000
3000
12:23
It's an approach built much more around intrinsic motivation.
266
731000
3000
12:26
Around the desire to do things because they matter,
267
734000
2000
12:28
because we like it, because they're interesting,
268
736000
2000
12:30
because they are part of something important.
269
738000
2000
12:32
And to my mind, that new operating system for our businesses
270
740000
4000
12:36
revolves around three elements:
271
744000
2000
12:38
autonomy, mastery and purpose.
272
746000
3000
12:41
Autonomy: the urge to direct our own lives.
273
749000
3000
12:44
Mastery: the desire to get better and better at something that matters.
274
752000
4000
12:48
Purpose: the yearning to do what we do
275
756000
3000
12:51
in the service of something larger than ourselves.
276
759000
3000
12:54
These are the building blocks of an entirely new operating system
277
762000
3000
12:57
for our businesses.
278
765000
2000
12:59
I want to talk today only about autonomy.
279
767000
4000
13:03
In the 20th century, we came up with this idea of management.
280
771000
3000
13:06
Management did not emanate from nature.
281
774000
2000
13:08
Management is like -- it's not a tree,
282
776000
2000
13:10
it's a television set.
283
778000
2000
13:12
Okay? Somebody invented it.
284
780000
2000
13:14
And it doesn't mean it's going to work forever.
285
782000
2000
13:16
Management is great.
286
784000
2000
13:18
Traditional notions of management are great
287
786000
2000
13:20
if you want compliance.
288
788000
2000
13:22
But if you want engagement, self-direction works better.
289
790000
3000
13:25
Let me give you some examples of some kind of radical
290
793000
2000
13:27
notions of self-direction.
291
795000
2000
13:29
What this means -- you don't see a lot of it,
292
797000
3000
13:32
but you see the first stirrings of something really interesting going on,
293
800000
3000
13:35
because what it means is paying people adequately
294
803000
2000
13:37
and fairly, absolutely --
295
805000
2000
13:39
getting the issue of money off the table,
296
807000
2000
13:41
and then giving people lots of autonomy.
297
809000
2000
13:43
Let me give you some examples.
298
811000
2000
13:45
How many of you have heard of the company Atlassian?
299
813000
4000
13:49
It looks like less than half.
300
817000
2000
13:51
(Laughter)
301
819000
2000
13:53
Atlassian is an Australian software company.
302
821000
4000
13:57
And they do something incredibly cool.
303
825000
2000
13:59
A few times a year they tell their engineers,
304
827000
2000
14:01
"Go for the next 24 hours and work on anything you want,
305
829000
4000
14:05
as long as it's not part of your regular job.
306
833000
2000
14:07
Work on anything you want."
307
835000
2000
14:09
So that engineers use this time to come up with
308
837000
2000
14:11
a cool patch for code, come up with an elegant hack.
309
839000
3000
14:14
Then they present all of the stuff that they've developed
310
842000
3000
14:17
to their teammates, to the rest of the company,
311
845000
3000
14:20
in this wild and wooly all-hands meeting
312
848000
2000
14:22
at the end of the day.
313
850000
2000
14:24
And then, being Australians, everybody has a beer.
314
852000
2000
14:26
They call them FedEx Days.
315
854000
3000
14:29
Why? Because you have to deliver something overnight.
316
857000
6000
14:35
It's pretty. It's not bad. It's a huge trademark violation,
317
863000
2000
14:37
but it's pretty clever.
318
865000
2000
14:39
(Laughter)
319
867000
1000
14:40
That one day of intense autonomy
320
868000
2000
14:42
has produced a whole array of software fixes
321
870000
2000
14:44
that might never have existed.
322
872000
2000
14:46
And it's worked so well that Atlassian has taken it to the next level
323
874000
2000
14:48
with 20 Percent Time --
324
876000
2000
14:50
done, famously, at Google --
325
878000
2000
14:52
where engineers can work, spend 20 percent of their time
326
880000
2000
14:54
working on anything they want.
327
882000
2000
14:56
They have autonomy over their time,
328
884000
2000
14:58
their task, their team, their technique.
329
886000
2000
15:00
Okay? Radical amounts of autonomy.
330
888000
2000
15:02
And at Google, as many of you know,
331
890000
4000
15:06
about half of the new products in a typical year
332
894000
2000
15:08
are birthed during that 20 Percent Time:
333
896000
3000
15:11
things like Gmail, Orkut, Google News.
334
899000
3000
15:14
Let me give you an even more radical example of it:
335
902000
3000
15:17
something called the Results Only Work Environment,
336
905000
2000
15:19
the ROWE,
337
907000
2000
15:21
created by two American consultants, in place
338
909000
2000
15:23
in place at about a dozen companies around North America.
339
911000
2000
15:25
In a ROWE people don't have schedules.
340
913000
4000
15:29
They show up when they want.
341
917000
2000
15:31
They don't have to be in the office at a certain time,
342
919000
2000
15:33
or any time.
343
921000
2000
15:35
They just have to get their work done.
344
923000
2000
15:37
How they do it, when they do it,
345
925000
2000
15:39
where they do it, is totally up to them.
346
927000
3000
15:42
Meetings in these kinds of environments are optional.
347
930000
4000
15:46
What happens?
348
934000
2000
15:48
Almost across the board, productivity goes up,
349
936000
3000
15:51
worker engagement goes up,
350
939000
3000
15:54
worker satisfaction goes up, turnover goes down.
351
942000
3000
15:57
Autonomy, mastery and purpose,
352
945000
2000
15:59
These are the building blocks of a new way of doing things.
353
947000
2000
16:01
Now some of you might look at this and say,
354
949000
3000
16:04
"Hmm, that sounds nice, but it's Utopian."
355
952000
3000
16:07
And I say, "Nope. I have proof."
356
955000
5000
16:12
The mid-1990s, Microsoft started
357
960000
2000
16:14
an encyclopedia called Encarta.
358
962000
2000
16:16
They had deployed all the right incentives,
359
964000
2000
16:18
all the right incentives. They paid professionals to
360
966000
3000
16:21
write and edit thousands of articles.
361
969000
2000
16:23
Well-compensated managers oversaw the whole thing
362
971000
2000
16:25
to make sure it came in on budget and on time.
363
973000
5000
16:30
A few years later another encyclopedia got started.
364
978000
2000
16:32
Different model, right?
365
980000
3000
16:35
Do it for fun. No one gets paid a cent, or a Euro or a Yen.
366
983000
4000
16:39
Do it because you like to do it.
367
987000
3000
16:42
Now if you had, just 10 years ago,
368
990000
3000
16:45
if you had gone to an economist, anywhere,
369
993000
2000
16:47
and said, "Hey, I've got these two different models for creating an encyclopedia.
370
995000
4000
16:51
If they went head to head, who would win?"
371
999000
3000
16:54
10 years ago you could not have found a single sober economist anywhere
372
1002000
4000
16:58
on planet Earth
373
1006000
2000
17:00
who would have predicted the Wikipedia model.
374
1008000
2000
17:02
This is the titanic battle between these two approaches.
375
1010000
3000
17:05
This is the Ali-Frazier of motivation. Right?
376
1013000
3000
17:08
This is the Thrilla' in Manila.
377
1016000
2000
17:10
Alright? Intrinsic motivators versus extrinsic motivators.
378
1018000
3000
17:13
Autonomy, mastery and purpose,
379
1021000
2000
17:15
versus carrot and sticks. And who wins?
380
1023000
2000
17:17
Intrinsic motivation, autonomy, mastery and purpose,
381
1025000
3000
17:20
in a knockout. Let me wrap up.
382
1028000
4000
17:24
There is a mismatch between what science knows and what business does.
383
1032000
3000
17:27
And here is what science knows.
384
1035000
2000
17:29
One: Those 20th century rewards,
385
1037000
2000
17:31
those motivators we think are a natural part of business,
386
1039000
3000
17:34
do work, but only in a surprisingly narrow band of circumstances.
387
1042000
4000
17:38
Two: Those if-then rewards often destroy creativity.
388
1046000
4000
17:42
Three: The secret to high performance
389
1050000
2000
17:44
isn't rewards and punishments,
390
1052000
2000
17:46
but that unseen intrinsic drive --
391
1054000
2000
17:48
the drive to do things for their own sake.
392
1056000
3000
17:51
The drive to do things cause they matter.
393
1059000
2000
17:53
And here's the best part. Here's the best part.
394
1061000
2000
17:55
We already know this. The science confirms what we know in our hearts.
395
1063000
3000
17:58
So, if we repair this mismatch
396
1066000
3000
18:01
between what science knows and what business does,
397
1069000
2000
18:03
if we bring our motivation, notions of motivation
398
1071000
3000
18:06
into the 21st century,
399
1074000
2000
18:08
if we get past this lazy, dangerous, ideology
400
1076000
4000
18:12
of carrots and sticks,
401
1080000
2000
18:14
we can strengthen our businesses,
402
1082000
3000
18:17
we can solve a lot of those candle problems,
403
1085000
3000
18:20
and maybe, maybe, maybe
404
1088000
4000
18:24
we can change the world.
405
1092000
2000
18:26
I rest my case.
406
1094000
2000
18:28
(Applause)
407
1096000
3000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Dan Pink - Career analystBidding adieu to his last "real job" as Al Gore's speechwriter, Dan Pink went freelance to spark a right-brain revolution in the career marketplace.
Why you should listen
With a trio of influential bestsellers, Dan Pink has changed the way companies view the modern workplace. In the pivotal A Whole New Mind, Pink identifies a sea change in the global workforce -- the shift of an information-based corporate culture to a conceptual base, where creativity and big-picture design dominates the landscape.
His latest book, The Adventures of Johnny Bunko, is an evolutionary transformation of the familiar career guide. Replacing linear text with a manga-inspired comic, Pink outlines six career laws vastly differing from the ones you've been taught. Members of the Johnny Bunko online forum participated in an online contest to create the seventh law -- "stay hungry."
A contributing editor for Wired, Pink is working on a new book on the science and economics of motivation for release in late 2009.
Dan Pink | Speaker | TED.com