ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Gary Flake - Technologist
Gary Flake is a Technical Fellow at Microsoft, and the founder and director of Live Labs.

Why you should listen

Gary Flake is a Technical Fellow at Microsoft, where he focuses on Internet products and technologies including search, advertising, content, portals, community and application development. In this capacity, he helps define and evolve Microsoft's product vision, technical architecture and business strategy for online services. He is also the founder and director of Live Labs, a skunkworks that bridges research and development, and is widely recognized for inventing new best practices for catalyzing and managing innovation.

Prior to joining Microsoft, Flake founded Yahoo! Research Labs, ran Yahoo!'s corporate R&D activities and company-wide innovation effort, and was the Chief Science Officer of Overture, the company that invented the paid search business model. Flake also wrote the award-winning book The Computational Beauty of Nature, which is used in college courses worldwide.

More profile about the speaker
Gary Flake | Speaker | TED.com
TED2010

Gary Flake: Is Pivot a turning point for web exploration?

Filmed:
751,479 views

Gary Flake demos Pivot, a new way to browse and arrange massive amounts of images and data online. Built on breakthrough Seadragon technology, it enables spectacular zooms in and out of web databases, and the discovery of patterns and links invisible in standard web browsing.
- Technologist
Gary Flake is a Technical Fellow at Microsoft, and the founder and director of Live Labs. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:16
If I can leave you with one big idea today,
0
1000
2000
00:18
it's that the whole of the data
1
3000
2000
00:20
in which we consume
2
5000
2000
00:22
is greater that the sum of the parts,
3
7000
2000
00:24
and instead of thinking about information overload,
4
9000
3000
00:27
what I'd like you to think about is how
5
12000
2000
00:29
we can use information so that patterns pop
6
14000
3000
00:32
and we can see trends that would otherwise be invisible.
7
17000
3000
00:35
So what we're looking at right here is a typical mortality chart
8
20000
3000
00:38
organized by age.
9
23000
2000
00:40
This tool that I'm using here is a little experiment.
10
25000
2000
00:42
It's called Pivot, and with Pivot what I can do
11
27000
3000
00:45
is I can choose to filter in one particular cause of deaths -- say, accidents.
12
30000
4000
00:49
And, right away, I see there's a different pattern that emerges.
13
34000
3000
00:52
This is because, in the mid-area here,
14
37000
2000
00:54
people are at their most active,
15
39000
2000
00:56
and over here they're at their most frail.
16
41000
2000
00:58
We can step back out again
17
43000
2000
01:00
and then reorganize the data by cause of death,
18
45000
2000
01:02
seeing that circulatory diseases and cancer
19
47000
3000
01:05
are the usual suspects, but not for everyone.
20
50000
3000
01:08
If we go ahead and we filter by age --
21
53000
3000
01:11
say 40 years or less --
22
56000
2000
01:13
we see that accidents are actually
23
58000
2000
01:15
the greatest cause that people have to be worried about.
24
60000
3000
01:18
And if you drill into that, it's especially the case for men.
25
63000
3000
01:21
So you get the idea
26
66000
2000
01:23
that viewing information, viewing data in this way,
27
68000
3000
01:26
is a lot like swimming
28
71000
2000
01:28
in a living information info-graphic.
29
73000
3000
01:31
And if we can do this for raw data,
30
76000
2000
01:33
why not do it for content as well?
31
78000
3000
01:36
So what we have right here
32
81000
2000
01:38
is the cover of every single Sports Illustrated
33
83000
3000
01:41
ever produced.
34
86000
2000
01:43
It's all here; it's all on the web.
35
88000
2000
01:45
You can go back to your rooms and try this after my talk.
36
90000
3000
01:48
With Pivot, you can drill into a decade.
37
93000
3000
01:51
You can drill into a particular year.
38
96000
2000
01:53
You can jump right into a specific issue.
39
98000
3000
01:56
So I'm looking at this; I see the athletes
40
101000
2000
01:58
that have appeared in this issue, the sports.
41
103000
2000
02:00
I'm a Lance Armstrong fan, so I'll go ahead and I'll click on that,
42
105000
3000
02:03
which reveals, for me, all the issues
43
108000
2000
02:05
in which Lance Armstrong's been a part of.
44
110000
2000
02:07
(Applause)
45
112000
3000
02:10
Now, if I want to just kind of take a peek at these,
46
115000
3000
02:13
I might think,
47
118000
2000
02:15
"Well, what about taking a look at all of cycling?"
48
120000
2000
02:17
So I can step back, and expand on that.
49
122000
2000
02:19
And I see Greg LeMond now.
50
124000
2000
02:21
And so you get the idea that when you
51
126000
2000
02:23
navigate over information this way --
52
128000
2000
02:25
going narrower, broader,
53
130000
2000
02:27
backing in, backing out --
54
132000
2000
02:29
you're not searching, you're not browsing.
55
134000
2000
02:31
You're doing something that's actually a little bit different.
56
136000
2000
02:33
It's in between, and we think it changes
57
138000
3000
02:36
the way information can be used.
58
141000
2000
02:38
So I want to extrapolate on this idea a bit
59
143000
2000
02:40
with something that's a little bit crazy.
60
145000
2000
02:42
What we're done here is we've taken every single Wikipedia page
61
147000
3000
02:45
and we reduced it down to a little summary.
62
150000
3000
02:48
So the summary consists of just a little synopsis
63
153000
3000
02:51
and an icon to indicate the topical area that it comes from.
64
156000
3000
02:54
I'm only showing the top 500
65
159000
3000
02:57
most popular Wikipedia pages right here.
66
162000
2000
02:59
But even in this limited view,
67
164000
2000
03:01
we can do a lot of things.
68
166000
2000
03:03
Right away, we get a sense of what are the topical domains
69
168000
2000
03:05
that are most popular on Wikipedia.
70
170000
2000
03:07
I'm going to go ahead and select government.
71
172000
2000
03:09
Now, having selected government,
72
174000
3000
03:12
I can now see that the Wikipedia categories
73
177000
2000
03:14
that most frequently correspond to that
74
179000
2000
03:16
are Time magazine People of the Year.
75
181000
3000
03:19
So this is really important because this is an insight
76
184000
3000
03:22
that was not contained within any one Wikipedia page.
77
187000
3000
03:25
It's only possible to see that insight
78
190000
2000
03:27
when you step back and look at all of them.
79
192000
3000
03:30
Looking at one of these particular summaries,
80
195000
2000
03:32
I can then drill into the concept of
81
197000
3000
03:35
Time magazine Person of the Year,
82
200000
2000
03:37
bringing up all of them.
83
202000
2000
03:39
So looking at these people,
84
204000
2000
03:41
I can see that the majority come from government;
85
206000
3000
03:45
some have come from natural sciences;
86
210000
3000
03:49
some, fewer still, have come from business --
87
214000
3000
03:53
there's my boss --
88
218000
2000
03:55
and one has come from music.
89
220000
5000
04:00
And interestingly enough,
90
225000
2000
04:02
Bono is also a TED Prize winner.
91
227000
3000
04:05
So we can go, jump, and take a look at all the TED Prize winners.
92
230000
3000
04:08
So you see, we're navigating the web for the first time
93
233000
3000
04:11
as if it's actually a web, not from page-to-page,
94
236000
3000
04:14
but at a higher level of abstraction.
95
239000
2000
04:16
And so I want to show you one other thing
96
241000
2000
04:18
that may catch you a little bit by surprise.
97
243000
3000
04:21
I'm just showing the New York Times website here.
98
246000
3000
04:24
So Pivot, this application --
99
249000
2000
04:26
I don't want to call it a browser; it's really not a browser,
100
251000
2000
04:28
but you can view web pages with it --
101
253000
3000
04:31
and we bring that zoomable technology
102
256000
2000
04:33
to every single web page like this.
103
258000
3000
04:36
So I can step back,
104
261000
3000
04:39
pop right back into a specific section.
105
264000
2000
04:41
Now the reason why this is important is because,
106
266000
2000
04:43
by virtue of just viewing web pages in this way,
107
268000
3000
04:46
I can look at my entire browsing history
108
271000
2000
04:48
in the exact same way.
109
273000
2000
04:50
So I can drill into what I've done
110
275000
2000
04:52
over specific time frames.
111
277000
2000
04:54
Here, in fact, is the state
112
279000
2000
04:56
of all the demo that I just gave.
113
281000
2000
04:58
And I can sort of replay some stuff that I was looking at earlier today.
114
283000
3000
05:01
And, if I want to step back and look at everything,
115
286000
3000
05:04
I can slice and dice my history,
116
289000
2000
05:06
perhaps by my search history --
117
291000
2000
05:08
here, I was doing some nepotistic searching,
118
293000
2000
05:10
looking for Bing, over here for Live Labs Pivot.
119
295000
3000
05:13
And from these, I can drill into the web page
120
298000
2000
05:15
and just launch them again.
121
300000
2000
05:17
It's one metaphor repurposed multiple times,
122
302000
3000
05:20
and in each case it makes the whole greater
123
305000
2000
05:22
than the sum of the parts with the data.
124
307000
2000
05:24
So right now, in this world,
125
309000
3000
05:27
we think about data as being this curse.
126
312000
3000
05:30
We talk about the curse of information overload.
127
315000
3000
05:33
We talk about drowning in data.
128
318000
3000
05:36
What if we can actually turn that upside down
129
321000
2000
05:38
and turn the web upside down,
130
323000
2000
05:40
so that instead of navigating from one thing to the next,
131
325000
3000
05:43
we get used to the habit of being able to go from many things to many things,
132
328000
3000
05:46
and then being able to see the patterns
133
331000
2000
05:48
that were otherwise hidden?
134
333000
2000
05:50
If we can do that, then instead of being trapped in data,
135
335000
5000
05:55
we might actually extract information.
136
340000
3000
05:58
And, instead of dealing just with information,
137
343000
2000
06:00
we can tease out knowledge.
138
345000
2000
06:02
And if we get the knowledge, then maybe even there's wisdom to be found.
139
347000
3000
06:05
So with that, I thank you.
140
350000
2000
06:07
(Applause)
141
352000
8000

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Gary Flake - Technologist
Gary Flake is a Technical Fellow at Microsoft, and the founder and director of Live Labs.

Why you should listen

Gary Flake is a Technical Fellow at Microsoft, where he focuses on Internet products and technologies including search, advertising, content, portals, community and application development. In this capacity, he helps define and evolve Microsoft's product vision, technical architecture and business strategy for online services. He is also the founder and director of Live Labs, a skunkworks that bridges research and development, and is widely recognized for inventing new best practices for catalyzing and managing innovation.

Prior to joining Microsoft, Flake founded Yahoo! Research Labs, ran Yahoo!'s corporate R&D activities and company-wide innovation effort, and was the Chief Science Officer of Overture, the company that invented the paid search business model. Flake also wrote the award-winning book The Computational Beauty of Nature, which is used in college courses worldwide.

More profile about the speaker
Gary Flake | Speaker | TED.com