Nita Farahany: When technology can read minds, how will we protect our privacy?
Nita A. Farahany is a leading scholar on the ethical, legal, and social implications of biosciences and emerging technologies, particularly those related to neuroscience and behavioral genetics. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
the 2009 presidential election in Iran,
violently suppressed
as the Iranian Green Movement,
between the protesters.
to the United States in the late 1960s,
extended family live.
crackdowns of the protest,
with me what was happening.
the conversation to other topics.
what the consequences could be
what they were thinking
based on what their brains revealed?
in neuroscience, artificial intelligence
of what's happening in the human brain.
about what this means for our freedoms
a right to cognitive liberty,
that needs to be protected.
thousands of thoughts each day.
or a number, a word,
mental state, like relaxation,
are firing in the brain,
in characteristic patterns
with electroencephalography, or EEG.
you're seeing right now.
that was recorded in real time
that was worn on my head.
when I was relaxed and curious.
consumer-based EEG devices
activity in my brain in real time.
that some of you may be wearing
or the steps that you've taken,
neuroimaging technique on the market.
our everyday lives.
inside the human brain
without ever uttering a word.
complex thoughts just yet,
of artificial intelligence,
some single-digit numbers
that a person is thinking
that with our advances in technology,
in the human brain
they're going to have an epileptic seizure
with their thoughts alone.
a technology to embed these sensors
while driving.
and AAA have all taken note.
choose-your-own-adventure movie
based on your brain-based reactions,
every time your attention wanes.
health and well-being
to information about themselves,
new brain-decoding technology.
or involuntarily give up
our mental privacy.
to social-media accounts ...
the Beijing-Shanghai high-speed rail,
while driving.
EEG sensors to monitor their productivity
concentration on their jobs,
of brain transparency.
that that could change everything.
of data privacy to our laws,
in the United States
of their brain information.
their perceived sensitivity
of their phone conversations,
security number as far more sensitive
people don't yet understand
of this new brain-decoding technology.
the inner workings of the human brain,
are the least of our worries.
a politically dissident thought?
because of their waning attention
collective action against their employers.
will no longer be an option,
have revealed their sexual orientation,
to consciously share that information
to keep up with technological change.
of the US Constitution,
to alter our thoughts however we want?
what we can do with our own brains?
using these new mobile devices?
the brain data through their applications
from doing so.
the same freedoms
the Iranian Green Movement
monitoring my family's brain activity,
to be sympathetic to the protesters?
based on their thoughts
dystopian society in "Minority Report."
with attempting to intimidate his school
shooting people in the hallways ...
an augmented-reality video game,
of his subjective intent.
need special protection.
to data tracking and aggregation
and tracked like our online activities,
threat to our collective humanity.
to these concerns,
on the right things.
protections in general,
the flow of information.
on securing rights and remedies
how their information was shared,
was misused against them,
in an employment setting
of our personal information.
can tell us so much
our information,
for mental privacy.
a right to cognitive liberty.
our freedom of thought and rumination,
the right to consent to or refuse
of our brains by others.
of Human Rights,
of these kinds of social rights.
and good old-fashioned word of mouth
restrictions in Iran
had used brain surveillance
the protesters' cries?
for a cognitive liberty revolution.
advance technology
from any person, company or government
or alter our innermost lives.
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Nita Farahany - Legal scholar, ethicistNita A. Farahany is a leading scholar on the ethical, legal, and social implications of biosciences and emerging technologies, particularly those related to neuroscience and behavioral genetics.
Why you should listen
Nita A. Farahany is a professor of law and philosophy, the founding director of the Duke Initiative for Science & Society and chair of the MA in Bioethics & Science Policy at Duke University. In 2010, Farahany was appointed by President Obama to the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, and she served as a member until 2017. She is a member of the Neuroethics Division of the Multi-Council Working Group for the BRAIN Initiative, on the President's Research Council of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR), and past member of the Global Agenda Council for Privacy, Technology and Governance at the World Economic Forum.
Farahany presents her work to diverse audiences and is a frequent commentator for national media and radio shows. She is an elected member of the American Law Institute, the President-Elect of the International Neuroethics Society, serves on the Board of the International Neuroethics Society, a co-editor a co-editor-in-chief and co-founder of the Journal of Law and the Biosciences and an editorial board member of the American Journal of Bioethics (Neuroscience). She's on the Ethics Advisory Board for Illumina, Inc., the Scientific Advisory Board of Helix, and the Board of Advisors of Scientific American.
Farahany received her AB in genetics, cell and developmental biology at Dartmouth College, a JD and MA from Duke University, as well as a PhD in philosophy. She also holds an ALM in biology from Harvard University. In 2004-2005, Farahany clerked for Judge Judith W. Rogers of the US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, after which she joined the faculty at Vanderbilt University. In 2011, Farahany was the Leah Kaplan Visiting Professor of Human Rights at Stanford Law School.
Nita Farahany | Speaker | TED.com