TEDGlobal 2010
Steven Johnson: Where good ideas come from
Filmed:
Readability: 4
4,960,715 views
People often credit their ideas to individual "Eureka!" moments. But Steven Johnson shows how history tells a different story. His fascinating tour takes us from the "liquid networks" of London's coffee houses to Charles Darwin's long, slow hunch to today's high-velocity web.
Steven Johnson - Writer
Steven Berlin Johnson examines the intersection of science, technology and personal experience. Full bio
Steven Berlin Johnson examines the intersection of science, technology and personal experience. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:15
Just a few minutes ago, I took this picture
0
0
3000
00:18
about 10 blocks from here.
1
3000
2000
00:20
This is the Grand Cafe here in Oxford.
2
5000
3000
00:23
I took this picture because this turns out to be
3
8000
3000
00:26
the first coffeehouse to open
4
11000
2000
00:28
in England in 1650.
5
13000
2000
00:30
That's its great claim to fame,
6
15000
2000
00:32
and I wanted to show it to you,
7
17000
2000
00:34
not because I want to give you the kind of Starbucks tour
8
19000
2000
00:36
of historic England,
9
21000
2000
00:38
but rather because
10
23000
2000
00:40
the English coffeehouse was crucial
11
25000
2000
00:42
to the development and spread
12
27000
3000
00:45
of one of the great intellectual flowerings of the last 500 years,
13
30000
3000
00:48
what we now call the Enlightenment.
14
33000
3000
00:51
And the coffeehouse played such a big role
15
36000
2000
00:53
in the birth of the Enlightenment,
16
38000
2000
00:55
in part, because of what people were drinking there.
17
40000
2000
00:57
Because, before the spread
18
42000
3000
01:00
of coffee and tea through British culture,
19
45000
3000
01:03
what people drank -- both elite and mass folks drank --
20
48000
3000
01:06
day-in and day-out, from dawn until dusk
21
51000
2000
01:08
was alcohol.
22
53000
2000
01:10
Alcohol was the daytime beverage of choice.
23
55000
2000
01:12
You would drink a little beer with breakfast and have a little wine at lunch,
24
57000
3000
01:15
a little gin -- particularly around 1650 --
25
60000
3000
01:18
and top it off with a little beer and wine at the end of the day.
26
63000
2000
01:20
That was the healthy choice -- right --
27
65000
2000
01:22
because the water wasn't safe to drink.
28
67000
2000
01:24
And so, effectively until the rise of the coffeehouse,
29
69000
3000
01:27
you had an entire population
30
72000
2000
01:29
that was effectively drunk all day.
31
74000
3000
01:32
And you can imagine what that would be like, right, in your own life --
32
77000
2000
01:34
and I know this is true of some of you --
33
79000
2000
01:36
if you were drinking all day,
34
81000
3000
01:39
and then you switched from a depressant to a stimulant in your life,
35
84000
3000
01:42
you would have better ideas.
36
87000
2000
01:44
You would be sharper and more alert.
37
89000
2000
01:46
And so it's not an accident that a great flowering of innovation happened
38
91000
3000
01:49
as England switched to tea and coffee.
39
94000
3000
01:52
But the other thing that makes the coffeehouse important
40
97000
3000
01:55
is the architecture of the space.
41
100000
2000
01:57
It was a space where people would get together
42
102000
2000
01:59
from different backgrounds,
43
104000
2000
02:01
different fields of expertise, and share.
44
106000
2000
02:03
It was a space, as Matt Ridley talked about, where ideas could have sex.
45
108000
3000
02:06
This was their conjugal bed, in a sense --
46
111000
2000
02:08
ideas would get together there.
47
113000
2000
02:10
And an astonishing number of innovations from this period
48
115000
3000
02:13
have a coffeehouse somewhere in their story.
49
118000
3000
02:16
I've been spending a lot of time thinking about coffeehouses
50
121000
3000
02:19
for the last five years,
51
124000
2000
02:21
because I've been kind of on this quest
52
126000
2000
02:23
to investigate this question
53
128000
2000
02:25
of where good ideas come from.
54
130000
2000
02:27
What are the environments
55
132000
2000
02:29
that lead to unusual levels of innovation,
56
134000
3000
02:32
unusual levels of creativity?
57
137000
3000
02:35
What's the kind of environmental --
58
140000
2000
02:37
what is the space of creativity?
59
142000
2000
02:39
And what I've done is
60
144000
2000
02:41
I've looked at both environments like the coffeehouse;
61
146000
2000
02:43
I've looked at media environments, like the world wide web,
62
148000
2000
02:45
that have been extraordinarily innovative;
63
150000
2000
02:47
I've gone back to the history of the first cities;
64
152000
3000
02:50
I've even gone to biological environments,
65
155000
2000
02:52
like coral reefs and rainforests,
66
157000
2000
02:54
that involve unusual levels of biological innovation;
67
159000
3000
02:57
and what I've been looking for is shared patterns,
68
162000
3000
03:00
kind of signature behavior that shows up
69
165000
2000
03:02
again and again in all of these environments.
70
167000
3000
03:05
Are there recurring patterns that we can learn from,
71
170000
3000
03:08
that we can take and kind of apply to our own lives,
72
173000
2000
03:10
or our own organizations,
73
175000
2000
03:12
or our own environments to make them more creative and innovative?
74
177000
2000
03:14
And I think I've found a few.
75
179000
2000
03:16
But what you have to do to make sense of this
76
181000
3000
03:19
and to really understand these principles
77
184000
2000
03:21
is you have to do away
78
186000
2000
03:23
with a lot of the way in which our conventional metaphors and language
79
188000
3000
03:26
steers us towards
80
191000
2000
03:28
certain concepts of idea-creation.
81
193000
2000
03:30
We have this very rich vocabulary
82
195000
2000
03:32
to describe moments of inspiration.
83
197000
2000
03:34
We have the kind of the flash of insight,
84
199000
3000
03:37
the stroke of insight,
85
202000
2000
03:39
we have epiphanies, we have "eureka!" moments,
86
204000
3000
03:42
we have the lightbulb moments, right?
87
207000
2000
03:44
All of these concepts,
88
209000
2000
03:46
as kind of rhetorically florid as they are,
89
211000
3000
03:49
share this basic assumption,
90
214000
2000
03:51
which is that an idea is a single thing,
91
216000
3000
03:54
it's something that happens often
92
219000
2000
03:56
in a wonderful illuminating moment.
93
221000
3000
03:59
But in fact, what I would argue and what you really need to kind of begin with
94
224000
3000
04:02
is this idea that an idea is a network
95
227000
3000
04:05
on the most elemental level.
96
230000
2000
04:07
I mean, this is what is happening inside your brain.
97
232000
2000
04:09
An idea -- a new idea -- is a new network of neurons
98
234000
3000
04:12
firing in sync with each other inside your brain.
99
237000
3000
04:15
It's a new configuration that has never formed before.
100
240000
3000
04:18
And the question is: how do you get your brain into environments
101
243000
3000
04:21
where these new networks are going to be more likely to form?
102
246000
3000
04:24
And it turns out that, in fact, the kind of network patterns of the outside world
103
249000
3000
04:27
mimic a lot of the network patterns
104
252000
2000
04:29
of the internal world of the human brain.
105
254000
3000
04:32
So the metaphor I'd like the use
106
257000
2000
04:34
I can take
107
259000
2000
04:36
from a story of a great idea that's quite recent --
108
261000
3000
04:39
a lot more recent than the 1650s.
109
264000
3000
04:43
A wonderful guy named Timothy Prestero,
110
268000
2000
04:45
who has a company called ... an organization called Design That Matters.
111
270000
3000
04:48
They decided to tackle this really pressing problem
112
273000
3000
04:53
of, you know, the terrible problems we have with infant mortality rates
113
278000
2000
04:55
in the developing world.
114
280000
2000
04:57
One of the things that's very frustrating about this is that we know,
115
282000
3000
05:00
by getting modern neonatal incubators
116
285000
3000
05:03
into any context,
117
288000
2000
05:05
if we can keep premature babies warm, basically -- it's very simple --
118
290000
3000
05:08
we can halve infant mortality rates in those environments.
119
293000
3000
05:11
So, the technology is there.
120
296000
2000
05:13
These are standard in all the industrialized worlds.
121
298000
3000
05:16
The problem is, if you buy a $40,000 incubator,
122
301000
3000
05:19
and you send it off
123
304000
2000
05:21
to a mid-sized village in Africa,
124
306000
2000
05:23
it will work great for a year or two years,
125
308000
2000
05:25
and then something will go wrong and it will break,
126
310000
3000
05:28
and it will remain broken forever,
127
313000
2000
05:30
because you don't have a whole system of spare parts,
128
315000
3000
05:33
and you don't have the on-the-ground expertise
129
318000
2000
05:35
to fix this $40,000 piece of equipment.
130
320000
2000
05:37
And so you end up having this problem where you spend all this money
131
322000
2000
05:39
getting aid and all these advanced electronics to these countries,
132
324000
3000
05:42
and then it ends up being useless.
133
327000
2000
05:44
So what Prestero and his team decided to do
134
329000
2000
05:46
is to look around and see: what are the abundant resources
135
331000
3000
05:49
in these developing world contexts?
136
334000
2000
05:51
And what they noticed was they don't have a lot of DVRs,
137
336000
3000
05:54
they don't have a lot of microwaves,
138
339000
2000
05:56
but they seem to do a pretty good job of keeping their cars on the road.
139
341000
3000
05:59
There's a Toyota Forerunner
140
344000
2000
06:01
on the street in all these places.
141
346000
2000
06:03
They seem to have the expertise to keep cars working.
142
348000
3000
06:06
So they started to think,
143
351000
2000
06:08
"Could we build a neonatal incubator
144
353000
2000
06:10
that's built entirely out of automobile parts?"
145
355000
3000
06:13
And this is what they ended up coming with.
146
358000
2000
06:15
It's called a "neonurture device."
147
360000
2000
06:17
From the outside, it looks like a normal little thing
148
362000
2000
06:19
you'd find in a modern, Western hospital.
149
364000
2000
06:21
In the inside, it's all car parts.
150
366000
2000
06:23
It's got a fan, it's got headlights for warmth,
151
368000
2000
06:25
it's got door chimes for alarm --
152
370000
2000
06:27
it runs off a car battery.
153
372000
2000
06:29
And so all you need is the spare parts from your Toyota
154
374000
2000
06:31
and the ability to fix a headlight,
155
376000
2000
06:33
and you can repair this thing.
156
378000
2000
06:35
Now, that's a great idea, but what I'd like to say is that, in fact,
157
380000
3000
06:38
this is a great metaphor for the way that ideas happen.
158
383000
2000
06:40
We like to think our breakthrough ideas, you know,
159
385000
2000
06:42
are like that $40,000, brand new incubator,
160
387000
2000
06:44
state-of-the-art technology,
161
389000
2000
06:46
but more often than not, they're cobbled together
162
391000
2000
06:48
from whatever parts that happen to be around nearby.
163
393000
2000
06:50
We take ideas from other people,
164
395000
2000
06:52
from people we've learned from, from people we run into in the coffee shop,
165
397000
3000
06:55
and we stitch them together into new forms and we create something new.
166
400000
3000
06:58
That's really where innovation happens.
167
403000
3000
07:01
And that means that we have to change some of our models
168
406000
2000
07:03
of what innovation and deep thinking really looks like, right.
169
408000
3000
07:06
I mean, this is one vision of it.
170
411000
2000
07:08
Another is Newton and the apple, when Newton was at Cambridge.
171
413000
3000
07:11
This is a statue from Oxford.
172
416000
2000
07:13
You know, you're sitting there thinking a deep thought,
173
418000
2000
07:15
and the apple falls from the tree, and you have the theory of gravity.
174
420000
3000
07:18
In fact, the spaces that have historically led to innovation
175
423000
3000
07:21
tend to look like this, right.
176
426000
2000
07:23
This is Hogarth's famous painting of a kind of political dinner at a tavern,
177
428000
3000
07:26
but this is what the coffee shops looked like back then.
178
431000
3000
07:29
This is the kind of chaotic environment
179
434000
2000
07:31
where ideas were likely to come together,
180
436000
2000
07:33
where people were likely to have
181
438000
2000
07:35
new, interesting, unpredictable collisions -- people from different backgrounds.
182
440000
3000
07:38
So, if we're trying to build organizations that are more innovative,
183
443000
2000
07:40
we have to build spaces that -- strangely enough -- look a little bit more like this.
184
445000
3000
07:43
This is what your office should look like,
185
448000
2000
07:45
is part of my message here.
186
450000
2000
07:47
And one of the problems with this is that
187
452000
2000
07:49
people are actually -- when you research this field --
188
454000
3000
07:52
people are notoriously unreliable,
189
457000
2000
07:54
when they actually kind of self-report
190
459000
2000
07:56
on where they have their own good ideas,
191
461000
2000
07:58
or their history of their best ideas.
192
463000
2000
08:00
And a few years ago, a wonderful researcher named Kevin Dunbar
193
465000
3000
08:03
decided to go around
194
468000
2000
08:05
and basically do the Big Brother approach
195
470000
2000
08:07
to figuring out where good ideas come from.
196
472000
2000
08:09
He went to a bunch of science labs around the world
197
474000
3000
08:12
and videotaped everyone
198
477000
2000
08:14
as they were doing every little bit of their job.
199
479000
2000
08:16
So when they were sitting in front of the microscope,
200
481000
2000
08:18
when they were talking to their colleague at the water cooler, and all these things.
201
483000
2000
08:20
And he recorded all of these conversations
202
485000
2000
08:22
and tried to figure out where the most important ideas,
203
487000
2000
08:24
where they happened.
204
489000
2000
08:26
And when we think about the classic image of the scientist in the lab,
205
491000
3000
08:29
we have this image -- you know, they're pouring over the microscope,
206
494000
3000
08:32
and they see something in the tissue sample.
207
497000
2000
08:34
And "oh, eureka," they've got the idea.
208
499000
3000
08:37
What happened actually when Dunbar kind of looked at the tape
209
502000
3000
08:40
is that, in fact, almost all of the important breakthrough ideas
210
505000
3000
08:43
did not happen alone in the lab, in front of the microscope.
211
508000
3000
08:46
They happened at the conference table
212
511000
2000
08:48
at the weekly lab meeting,
213
513000
2000
08:50
when everybody got together and shared their kind of latest data and findings,
214
515000
3000
08:53
oftentimes when people shared the mistakes they were having,
215
518000
2000
08:55
the error, the noise in the signal they were discovering.
216
520000
3000
08:58
And something about that environment --
217
523000
3000
09:01
and I've started calling it the "liquid network,"
218
526000
2000
09:03
where you have lots of different ideas that are together,
219
528000
3000
09:06
different backgrounds, different interests,
220
531000
2000
09:08
jostling with each other, bouncing off each other --
221
533000
2000
09:10
that environment is, in fact,
222
535000
2000
09:12
the environment that leads to innovation.
223
537000
2000
09:14
The other problem that people have
224
539000
2000
09:16
is they like to condense their stories of innovation down
225
541000
2000
09:18
to kind of shorter time frames.
226
543000
2000
09:20
So they want to tell the story of the "eureka!" moment.
227
545000
3000
09:23
They want to say, "There I was, I was standing there
228
548000
2000
09:25
and I had it all suddenly clear in my head."
229
550000
2000
09:27
But in fact, if you go back and look at the historical record,
230
552000
3000
09:30
it turns out that a lot of important ideas
231
555000
3000
09:33
have very long incubation periods --
232
558000
3000
09:36
I call this the "slow hunch."
233
561000
2000
09:38
We've heard a lot recently
234
563000
2000
09:40
about hunch and instinct
235
565000
2000
09:42
and blink-like sudden moments of clarity,
236
567000
3000
09:45
but in fact, a lot of great ideas
237
570000
2000
09:47
linger on, sometimes for decades,
238
572000
2000
09:49
in the back of people's minds.
239
574000
2000
09:51
They have a feeling that there's an interesting problem,
240
576000
2000
09:53
but they don't quite have the tools yet to discover them.
241
578000
3000
09:56
They spend all this time working on certain problems,
242
581000
3000
09:59
but there's another thing lingering there
243
584000
2000
10:01
that they're interested in, but they can't quite solve.
244
586000
2000
10:03
Darwin is a great example of this.
245
588000
2000
10:05
Darwin himself, in his autobiography,
246
590000
2000
10:07
tells the story of coming up with the idea
247
592000
2000
10:09
for natural selection
248
594000
2000
10:11
as a classic "eureka!" moment.
249
596000
2000
10:13
He's in his study,
250
598000
2000
10:15
it's October of 1838,
251
600000
2000
10:17
and he's reading Malthus, actually, on population.
252
602000
2000
10:19
And all of a sudden,
253
604000
2000
10:21
the basic algorithm of natural selection kind of pops into his head
254
606000
3000
10:24
and he says, "Ah, at last, I had a theory with which to work."
255
609000
3000
10:27
That's in his autobiography.
256
612000
2000
10:29
About a decade or two ago,
257
614000
2000
10:31
a wonderful scholar named Howard Gruber went back
258
616000
2000
10:33
and looked at Darwin's notebooks from this period.
259
618000
3000
10:36
And Darwin kept these copious notebooks
260
621000
2000
10:38
where he wrote down every little idea he had, every little hunch.
261
623000
3000
10:41
And what Gruber found was
262
626000
2000
10:43
that Darwin had the full theory of natural selection
263
628000
3000
10:46
for months and months and months
264
631000
2000
10:48
before he had his alleged epiphany,
265
633000
2000
10:50
reading Malthus in October of 1838.
266
635000
3000
10:53
There are passages where you can read it,
267
638000
2000
10:55
and you think you're reading from a Darwin textbook,
268
640000
3000
10:58
from the period before he has this epiphany.
269
643000
3000
11:01
And so what you realize is that Darwin, in a sense,
270
646000
2000
11:03
had the idea, he had the concept,
271
648000
2000
11:05
but was unable of fully thinking it yet.
272
650000
3000
11:08
And that is actually how great ideas often happen;
273
653000
3000
11:11
they fade into view over long periods of time.
274
656000
2000
11:13
Now the challenge for all of us is:
275
658000
2000
11:15
how do you create environments
276
660000
2000
11:17
that allow these ideas to have this kind of long half-life, right?
277
662000
2000
11:19
It's hard to go to your boss and say,
278
664000
2000
11:21
"I have an excellent idea for our organization.
279
666000
2000
11:23
It will be useful in 2020.
280
668000
3000
11:26
Could you just give me some time to do that?"
281
671000
2000
11:28
Now a couple of companies -- like Google --
282
673000
2000
11:30
they have innovation time off, 20 percent time,
283
675000
2000
11:32
where, in a sense, those are hunch-cultivating mechanisms in an organization.
284
677000
3000
11:35
But that's a key thing.
285
680000
3000
11:38
And the other thing is to allow those hunches
286
683000
2000
11:40
to connect with other people's hunches; that's what often happens.
287
685000
3000
11:43
You have half of an idea, somebody else has the other half,
288
688000
2000
11:45
and if you're in the right environment,
289
690000
2000
11:47
they turn into something larger than the sum of their parts.
290
692000
2000
11:49
So, in a sense,
291
694000
2000
11:51
we often talk about the value
292
696000
2000
11:53
of protecting intellectual property,
293
698000
2000
11:55
you know, building barricades,
294
700000
2000
11:57
having secretive R&D labs, patenting everything that we have,
295
702000
3000
12:00
so that those ideas will remain valuable,
296
705000
3000
12:03
and people will be incentivized to come up with more ideas,
297
708000
2000
12:05
and the culture will be more innovative.
298
710000
3000
12:08
But I think there's a case to be made
299
713000
2000
12:10
that we should spend at least as much time, if not more,
300
715000
3000
12:13
valuing the premise of connecting ideas
301
718000
2000
12:15
and not just protecting them.
302
720000
2000
12:17
And I'll leave you with this story,
303
722000
2000
12:19
which I think captures a lot of these values,
304
724000
3000
12:22
and it's just wonderful kind of tale of innovation
305
727000
2000
12:24
and how it happens in unlikely ways.
306
729000
3000
12:27
It's October of 1957,
307
732000
3000
12:30
and Sputnik has just launched,
308
735000
2000
12:32
and we're in Laurel Maryland,
309
737000
2000
12:34
at the applied physics lab
310
739000
2000
12:36
associated with Johns Hopkins University.
311
741000
2000
12:38
And it's Monday morning,
312
743000
2000
12:40
and the news has just broken about this satellite
313
745000
2000
12:42
that's now orbiting the planet.
314
747000
3000
12:45
And of course, this is nerd heaven, right?
315
750000
2000
12:47
There are all these physics geeks who are there thinking,
316
752000
2000
12:49
"Oh my gosh! This is incredible. I can't believe this has happened."
317
754000
3000
12:52
And two of them,
318
757000
2000
12:54
two 20-something researchers at the APL
319
759000
2000
12:56
are there at the cafeteria table
320
761000
2000
12:58
having an informal conversation with a bunch of their colleagues.
321
763000
3000
13:01
And these two guys are named Guier and Weiffenbach.
322
766000
3000
13:04
And they start talking, and one of them says,
323
769000
2000
13:06
"Hey, has anybody tried to listen for this thing?
324
771000
2000
13:08
There's this, you know, man-made satellite up there in outer space
325
773000
3000
13:11
that's obviously broadcasting some kind of signal.
326
776000
2000
13:13
We could probably hear it, if we tune in."
327
778000
3000
13:16
And so they ask around to a couple of their colleagues,
328
781000
2000
13:18
and everybody's like, "No, I hadn't thought of doing that.
329
783000
2000
13:20
That's an interesting idea."
330
785000
2000
13:22
And it turns out Weiffenbach is kind of an expert
331
787000
3000
13:25
in microwave reception,
332
790000
2000
13:27
and he's got a little antennae set up
333
792000
2000
13:29
with an amplifier in his office.
334
794000
2000
13:31
And so Guier and Weiffenbach go back to Weiffenbach's office,
335
796000
2000
13:33
and they start kind of noodling around -- hacking, as we might call it now.
336
798000
3000
13:36
And after a couple of hours, they actually start picking up the signal,
337
801000
3000
13:39
because the Soviets made Sputnik
338
804000
2000
13:41
very easy to track.
339
806000
2000
13:43
It was right at 20 MHz, so you could pick it up really easily,
340
808000
3000
13:46
because they were afraid that people would think it was a hoax, basically.
341
811000
2000
13:48
So they made it really easy to find it.
342
813000
2000
13:50
So these two guys are sitting there listening to this signal,
343
815000
3000
13:53
and people start kind of coming into the office and saying,
344
818000
2000
13:55
"Wow, that's pretty cool. Can I hear? Wow, that's great."
345
820000
3000
13:58
And before long, they think, "Well jeez, this is kind of historic.
346
823000
3000
14:01
We may be the first people in the United States to be listening to this.
347
826000
2000
14:03
We should record it."
348
828000
2000
14:05
And so they bring in this big, clunky analog tape recorder
349
830000
2000
14:07
and they start recording these little bleep, bleeps.
350
832000
3000
14:10
And they start writing the kind of date stamp, time stamps
351
835000
3000
14:13
for each little bleep that they record.
352
838000
3000
14:16
And they they start thinking, "Well gosh, you know, we're noticing
353
841000
2000
14:18
small little frequency variations here.
354
843000
3000
14:21
We could probably calculate the speed
355
846000
3000
14:24
that the satellite is traveling,
356
849000
2000
14:26
if we do a little basic math here
357
851000
2000
14:28
using the Doppler effect."
358
853000
2000
14:30
And then they played around with it a little bit more,
359
855000
2000
14:32
and they talked to a couple of their colleagues
360
857000
2000
14:34
who had other kind of specialties.
361
859000
2000
14:36
And they said, "Jeez, you know,
362
861000
2000
14:38
we think we could actually take a look at the slope of the Doppler effect
363
863000
2000
14:40
to figure out the points at which
364
865000
2000
14:42
the satellite is closest to our antennae
365
867000
2000
14:44
and the points at which it's farthest away.
366
869000
2000
14:46
That's pretty cool."
367
871000
2000
14:48
And eventually, they get permission --
368
873000
2000
14:50
this is all a little side project that hadn't been officially part of their job description.
369
875000
3000
14:53
They get permission to use the new, you know, UNIVAC computer
370
878000
3000
14:56
that takes up an entire room that they'd just gotten at the APL.
371
881000
3000
14:59
They run some more of the numbers, and at the end of about three or four weeks,
372
884000
3000
15:02
turns out they have mapped the exact trajectory
373
887000
3000
15:05
of this satellite around the Earth,
374
890000
2000
15:07
just from listening to this one little signal,
375
892000
2000
15:09
going off on this little side hunch that they'd been inspired to do
376
894000
3000
15:12
over lunch one morning.
377
897000
3000
15:15
A couple weeks later their boss, Frank McClure,
378
900000
3000
15:18
pulls them into the room and says,
379
903000
2000
15:20
"Hey, you guys, I have to ask you something
380
905000
2000
15:22
about that project you were working on.
381
907000
2000
15:24
You've figured out an unknown location
382
909000
2000
15:26
of a satellite orbiting the planet
383
911000
3000
15:29
from a known location on the ground.
384
914000
2000
15:31
Could you go the other way?
385
916000
2000
15:33
Could you figure out an unknown location on the ground,
386
918000
2000
15:35
if you knew the location of the satellite?"
387
920000
3000
15:38
And they thought about it and they said,
388
923000
2000
15:40
"Well, I guess maybe you could. Let's run the numbers here."
389
925000
3000
15:43
So they went back, and they thought about it.
390
928000
2000
15:45
And they came back and said, "Actually, it'll be easier."
391
930000
2000
15:47
And he said, "Oh, that's great.
392
932000
2000
15:49
Because see, I have these new nuclear submarines
393
934000
3000
15:52
that I'm building.
394
937000
2000
15:54
And it's really hard to figure out how to get your missile
395
939000
3000
15:57
so that it will land right on top of Moscow,
396
942000
2000
15:59
if you don't know where the submarine is in the middle of the Pacific Ocean.
397
944000
3000
16:02
So we're thinking, we could throw up a bunch of satellites
398
947000
3000
16:05
and use it to track our submarines
399
950000
3000
16:08
and figure out their location in the middle of the ocean.
400
953000
2000
16:10
Could you work on that problem?"
401
955000
2000
16:12
And that's how GPS was born.
402
957000
3000
16:15
30 years later,
403
960000
2000
16:17
Ronald Reagan actually opened it up and made it an open platform
404
962000
3000
16:20
that anybody could kind of build upon
405
965000
2000
16:22
and anybody could come along and build new technology
406
967000
3000
16:25
that would create and innovate
407
970000
2000
16:27
on top of this open platform,
408
972000
2000
16:29
left it open for anyone to do
409
974000
2000
16:31
pretty much anything they wanted with it.
410
976000
2000
16:33
And now, I guarantee you
411
978000
2000
16:35
certainly half of this room, if not more,
412
980000
2000
16:37
has a device sitting in their pocket right now
413
982000
2000
16:39
that is talking to one of these satellites in outer space.
414
984000
3000
16:42
And I bet you one of you, if not more,
415
987000
3000
16:45
has used said device and said satellite system
416
990000
3000
16:48
to locate a nearby coffeehouse somewhere in the last --
417
993000
3000
16:51
(Laughter)
418
996000
2000
16:53
in the last day or last week, right?
419
998000
3000
16:56
(Applause)
420
1001000
3000
16:59
And that, I think,
421
1004000
2000
17:01
is a great case study, a great lesson
422
1006000
3000
17:04
in the power, the marvelous, kind of unplanned
423
1009000
2000
17:06
emergent, unpredictable power
424
1011000
3000
17:09
of open innovative systems.
425
1014000
2000
17:11
When you build them right, they will be led to completely new directions
426
1016000
2000
17:13
that the creators never even dreamed of.
427
1018000
2000
17:15
I mean, here you have these guys
428
1020000
2000
17:17
who basically thought they were just following this hunch,
429
1022000
2000
17:19
this little passion that had developed,
430
1024000
2000
17:21
then they thought they were fighting the Cold War,
431
1026000
2000
17:23
and then it turns out they're just helping somebody
432
1028000
2000
17:25
find a soy latte.
433
1030000
2000
17:27
(Laughter)
434
1032000
2000
17:29
That is how innovation happens.
435
1034000
2000
17:31
Chance favors the connected mind.
436
1036000
2000
17:33
Thank you very much.
437
1038000
2000
17:35
(Applause)
438
1040000
3000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Steven Johnson - WriterSteven Berlin Johnson examines the intersection of science, technology and personal experience.
Why you should listen
Steven Johnson is a leading light of today's interdisciplinary and collaborative approach to innovation. His writings have influenced everything from cutting-edge ideas in urban planning to the battle against 21st-century terrorism. Johnson was chosen by Prospect magazine as one of the top ten brains of the digital future, and The Wall Street Journal calls him "one of the most persuasive advocates for the role of collaboration in innovation."
Johnson's work on the history of innovation inspired the Emmy-nominated six-part series on PBS, "How We Got To Now with Steven Johnson," which aired in the fall of 2014. The book version of How We Got To Now was a finalist for the PEN/E.O. Wilson Literary Science Writing Award. His new book, Wonderland: How Play Made the Modern World, revolves around the creative power of play and delight: ideas and innovations that set into motion many momentous changes in science, technology, politics and society.
Johnson is also the author of the bestselling Where Good Ideas Come From: The Natural History of Innovation, one of his many books celebrating progress and innovation. Others include The Invention of Air and The Ghost Map. Everything Bad Is Good For You, one of the most discussed books of 2005, argued that the increasing complexity of modern media is training us to think in more complex ways. Emergence and Future Perfect explore the power of bottom-up intelligence in both nature and contemporary society.
An innovator himself, Johnson has co-created three influential sites: the pioneering online magazine FEED, the Webby-Award-winning community site, Plastic.com, and the hyperlocal media site outside.in, which was acquired by AOL in 2011.
Johnson is a regular contributor to WIRED magazine, as well as the New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and many other periodicals. He has appeared on many high-profile television programs, including "The Charlie Rose Show," "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart" and "The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer."
Steven Johnson | Speaker | TED.com