TEDGlobal 2011
Alison Gopnik: What do babies think?
Filmed:
Readability: 3.4
4,341,974 views
"Babies and young children are like the R&D division of the human species," says psychologist Alison Gopnik. Her research explores the sophisticated intelligence-gathering and decision-making that babies are really doing when they play.
Alison Gopnik - Child development psychologist
Alison Gopnik takes us into the fascinating minds of babies and children, and shows us how much we understand before we even realize we do. Full bio
Alison Gopnik takes us into the fascinating minds of babies and children, and shows us how much we understand before we even realize we do. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:15
What is going on
0
0
2000
00:17
in this baby's mind?
1
2000
2000
00:19
If you'd asked people this 30 years ago,
2
4000
2000
00:21
most people, including psychologists,
3
6000
2000
00:23
would have said that this baby was irrational,
4
8000
3000
00:26
illogical, egocentric --
5
11000
2000
00:28
that he couldn't take the perspective of another person
6
13000
2000
00:30
or understand cause and effect.
7
15000
2000
00:32
In the last 20 years,
8
17000
2000
00:34
developmental science has completely overturned that picture.
9
19000
3000
00:37
So in some ways,
10
22000
2000
00:39
we think that this baby's thinking
11
24000
2000
00:41
is like the thinking of the most brilliant scientists.
12
26000
4000
00:45
Let me give you just one example of this.
13
30000
2000
00:47
One thing that this baby could be thinking about,
14
32000
3000
00:50
that could be going on in his mind,
15
35000
2000
00:52
is trying to figure out
16
37000
2000
00:54
what's going on in the mind of that other baby.
17
39000
3000
00:57
After all, one of the things that's hardest for all of us to do
18
42000
3000
01:00
is to figure out what other people are thinking and feeling.
19
45000
3000
01:03
And maybe the hardest thing of all
20
48000
2000
01:05
is to figure out that what other people think and feel
21
50000
3000
01:08
isn't actually exactly like what we think and feel.
22
53000
2000
01:10
Anyone who's followed politics can testify
23
55000
2000
01:12
to how hard that is for some people to get.
24
57000
3000
01:15
We wanted to know
25
60000
2000
01:17
if babies and young children
26
62000
2000
01:19
could understand this really profound thing about other people.
27
64000
3000
01:22
Now the question is: How could we ask them?
28
67000
2000
01:24
Babies, after all, can't talk,
29
69000
2000
01:26
and if you ask a three year-old
30
71000
2000
01:28
to tell you what he thinks,
31
73000
2000
01:30
what you'll get is a beautiful stream of consciousness monologue
32
75000
3000
01:33
about ponies and birthdays and things like that.
33
78000
3000
01:36
So how do we actually ask them the question?
34
81000
3000
01:39
Well it turns out that the secret was broccoli.
35
84000
3000
01:42
What we did -- Betty Rapacholi, who was one of my students, and I --
36
87000
4000
01:46
was actually to give the babies two bowls of food:
37
91000
3000
01:49
one bowl of raw broccoli
38
94000
2000
01:51
and one bowl of delicious goldfish crackers.
39
96000
3000
01:54
Now all of the babies, even in Berkley,
40
99000
3000
01:57
like the crackers and don't like the raw broccoli.
41
102000
3000
02:00
(Laughter)
42
105000
2000
02:02
But then what Betty did
43
107000
2000
02:04
was to take a little taste of food from each bowl.
44
109000
3000
02:07
And she would act as if she liked it or she didn't.
45
112000
2000
02:09
So half the time, she acted
46
114000
2000
02:11
as if she liked the crackers and didn't like the broccoli --
47
116000
2000
02:13
just like a baby and any other sane person.
48
118000
3000
02:16
But half the time,
49
121000
2000
02:18
what she would do is take a little bit of the broccoli
50
123000
2000
02:20
and go, "Mmmmm, broccoli.
51
125000
3000
02:23
I tasted the broccoli. Mmmmm."
52
128000
3000
02:26
And then she would take a little bit of the crackers,
53
131000
2000
02:28
and she'd go, "Eww, yuck, crackers.
54
133000
4000
02:32
I tasted the crackers. Eww, yuck."
55
137000
3000
02:35
So she'd act as if what she wanted
56
140000
2000
02:37
was just the opposite of what the babies wanted.
57
142000
3000
02:40
We did this with 15 and 18 month-old babies.
58
145000
2000
02:42
And then she would simply put her hand out and say,
59
147000
3000
02:45
"Can you give me some?"
60
150000
2000
02:47
So the question is: What would the baby give her,
61
152000
2000
02:49
what they liked or what she liked?
62
154000
2000
02:51
And the remarkable thing was that 18 month-old babies,
63
156000
3000
02:54
just barely walking and talking,
64
159000
2000
02:56
would give her the crackers if she liked the crackers,
65
161000
3000
02:59
but they would give her the broccoli if she liked the broccoli.
66
164000
3000
03:02
On the other hand,
67
167000
2000
03:04
15 month-olds would stare at her for a long time
68
169000
2000
03:06
if she acted as if she liked the broccoli,
69
171000
2000
03:08
like they couldn't figure this out.
70
173000
3000
03:11
But then after they stared for a long time,
71
176000
2000
03:13
they would just give her the crackers,
72
178000
2000
03:15
what they thought everybody must like.
73
180000
2000
03:17
So there are two really remarkable things about this.
74
182000
3000
03:20
The first one is that these little 18 month-old babies
75
185000
3000
03:23
have already discovered
76
188000
2000
03:25
this really profound fact about human nature,
77
190000
2000
03:27
that we don't always want the same thing.
78
192000
2000
03:29
And what's more, they felt that they should actually do things
79
194000
2000
03:31
to help other people get what they wanted.
80
196000
3000
03:34
Even more remarkably though,
81
199000
2000
03:36
the fact that 15 month-olds didn't do this
82
201000
3000
03:39
suggests that these 18 month-olds had learned
83
204000
3000
03:42
this deep, profound fact about human nature
84
207000
3000
03:45
in the three months from when they were 15 months old.
85
210000
3000
03:48
So children both know more and learn more
86
213000
2000
03:50
than we ever would have thought.
87
215000
2000
03:52
And this is just one of hundreds and hundreds of studies over the last 20 years
88
217000
4000
03:56
that's actually demonstrated it.
89
221000
2000
03:58
The question you might ask though is:
90
223000
2000
04:00
Why do children learn so much?
91
225000
3000
04:03
And how is it possible for them to learn so much
92
228000
2000
04:05
in such a short time?
93
230000
2000
04:07
I mean, after all, if you look at babies superficially,
94
232000
2000
04:09
they seem pretty useless.
95
234000
2000
04:11
And actually in many ways, they're worse than useless,
96
236000
3000
04:14
because we have to put so much time and energy
97
239000
2000
04:16
into just keeping them alive.
98
241000
2000
04:18
But if we turn to evolution
99
243000
2000
04:20
for an answer to this puzzle
100
245000
2000
04:22
of why we spend so much time
101
247000
2000
04:24
taking care of useless babies,
102
249000
3000
04:27
it turns out that there's actually an answer.
103
252000
3000
04:30
If we look across many, many different species of animals,
104
255000
3000
04:33
not just us primates,
105
258000
2000
04:35
but also including other mammals, birds,
106
260000
2000
04:37
even marsupials
107
262000
2000
04:39
like kangaroos and wombats,
108
264000
2000
04:41
it turns out that there's a relationship
109
266000
2000
04:43
between how long a childhood a species has
110
268000
4000
04:47
and how big their brains are compared to their bodies
111
272000
4000
04:51
and how smart and flexible they are.
112
276000
2000
04:53
And sort of the posterbirds for this idea are the birds up there.
113
278000
3000
04:56
On one side
114
281000
2000
04:58
is a New Caledonian crow.
115
283000
2000
05:00
And crows and other corvidae, ravens, rooks and so forth,
116
285000
3000
05:03
are incredibly smart birds.
117
288000
2000
05:05
They're as smart as chimpanzees in some respects.
118
290000
3000
05:08
And this is a bird on the cover of science
119
293000
2000
05:10
who's learned how to use a tool to get food.
120
295000
3000
05:13
On the other hand,
121
298000
2000
05:15
we have our friend the domestic chicken.
122
300000
2000
05:17
And chickens and ducks and geese and turkeys
123
302000
3000
05:20
are basically as dumb as dumps.
124
305000
2000
05:22
So they're very, very good at pecking for grain,
125
307000
3000
05:25
and they're not much good at doing anything else.
126
310000
3000
05:28
Well it turns out that the babies,
127
313000
2000
05:30
the New Caledonian crow babies, are fledglings.
128
315000
2000
05:32
They depend on their moms
129
317000
2000
05:34
to drop worms in their little open mouths
130
319000
3000
05:37
for as long as two years,
131
322000
2000
05:39
which is a really long time in the life of a bird.
132
324000
2000
05:41
Whereas the chickens are actually mature
133
326000
2000
05:43
within a couple of months.
134
328000
2000
05:45
So childhood is the reason
135
330000
3000
05:48
why the crows end up on the cover of Science
136
333000
2000
05:50
and the chickens end up in the soup pot.
137
335000
2000
05:52
There's something about that long childhood
138
337000
3000
05:55
that seems to be connected
139
340000
2000
05:57
to knowledge and learning.
140
342000
2000
05:59
Well what kind of explanation could we have for this?
141
344000
3000
06:02
Well some animals, like the chicken,
142
347000
3000
06:05
seem to be beautifully suited
143
350000
2000
06:07
to doing just one thing very well.
144
352000
2000
06:09
So they seem to be beautifully suited
145
354000
3000
06:12
to pecking grain in one environment.
146
357000
2000
06:14
Other creatures, like the crows,
147
359000
2000
06:16
aren't very good at doing anything in particular,
148
361000
2000
06:18
but they're extremely good
149
363000
2000
06:20
at learning about laws of different environments.
150
365000
2000
06:22
And of course, we human beings
151
367000
2000
06:24
are way out on the end of the distribution like the crows.
152
369000
3000
06:27
We have bigger brains relative to our bodies
153
372000
2000
06:29
by far than any other animal.
154
374000
2000
06:31
We're smarter, we're more flexible,
155
376000
2000
06:33
we can learn more,
156
378000
2000
06:35
we survive in more different environments,
157
380000
2000
06:37
we migrated to cover the world and even go to outer space.
158
382000
3000
06:40
And our babies and children are dependent on us
159
385000
3000
06:43
for much longer than the babies of any other species.
160
388000
3000
06:46
My son is 23.
161
391000
2000
06:48
(Laughter)
162
393000
2000
06:50
And at least until they're 23,
163
395000
2000
06:52
we're still popping those worms
164
397000
2000
06:54
into those little open mouths.
165
399000
3000
06:57
All right, why would we see this correlation?
166
402000
3000
07:00
Well an idea is that that strategy, that learning strategy,
167
405000
4000
07:04
is an extremely powerful, great strategy for getting on in the world,
168
409000
3000
07:07
but it has one big disadvantage.
169
412000
2000
07:09
And that one big disadvantage
170
414000
2000
07:11
is that, until you actually do all that learning,
171
416000
3000
07:14
you're going to be helpless.
172
419000
2000
07:16
So you don't want to have the mastodon charging at you
173
421000
3000
07:19
and be saying to yourself,
174
424000
2000
07:21
"A slingshot or maybe a spear might work. Which would actually be better?"
175
426000
4000
07:25
You want to know all that
176
430000
2000
07:27
before the mastodons actually show up.
177
432000
2000
07:29
And the way the evolutions seems to have solved that problem
178
434000
3000
07:32
is with a kind of division of labor.
179
437000
2000
07:34
So the idea is that we have this early period when we're completely protected.
180
439000
3000
07:37
We don't have to do anything. All we have to do is learn.
181
442000
3000
07:40
And then as adults,
182
445000
2000
07:42
we can take all those things that we learned when we were babies and children
183
447000
3000
07:45
and actually put them to work to do things out there in the world.
184
450000
3000
07:48
So one way of thinking about it
185
453000
2000
07:50
is that babies and young children
186
455000
2000
07:52
are like the research and development division of the human species.
187
457000
3000
07:55
So they're the protected blue sky guys
188
460000
3000
07:58
who just have to go out and learn and have good ideas,
189
463000
2000
08:00
and we're production and marketing.
190
465000
2000
08:02
We have to take all those ideas
191
467000
2000
08:04
that we learned when we were children
192
469000
2000
08:06
and actually put them to use.
193
471000
2000
08:08
Another way of thinking about it
194
473000
2000
08:10
is instead of thinking of babies and children
195
475000
2000
08:12
as being like defective grownups,
196
477000
2000
08:14
we should think about them
197
479000
2000
08:16
as being a different developmental stage of the same species --
198
481000
2000
08:18
kind of like caterpillars and butterflies --
199
483000
3000
08:21
except that they're actually the brilliant butterflies
200
486000
2000
08:23
who are flitting around the garden and exploring,
201
488000
3000
08:26
and we're the caterpillars
202
491000
2000
08:28
who are inching along our narrow, grownup, adult path.
203
493000
3000
08:31
If this is true, if these babies are designed to learn --
204
496000
3000
08:34
and this evolutionary story would say children are for learning,
205
499000
3000
08:37
that's what they're for --
206
502000
2000
08:39
we might expect
207
504000
2000
08:41
that they would have really powerful learning mechanisms.
208
506000
2000
08:43
And in fact, the baby's brain
209
508000
3000
08:46
seems to be the most powerful learning computer
210
511000
2000
08:48
on the planet.
211
513000
2000
08:50
But real computers are actually getting to be a lot better.
212
515000
3000
08:53
And there's been a revolution
213
518000
2000
08:55
in our understanding of machine learning recently.
214
520000
2000
08:57
And it all depends on the ideas of this guy,
215
522000
3000
09:00
the Reverend Thomas Bayes,
216
525000
2000
09:02
who was a statistician and mathematician in the 18th century.
217
527000
3000
09:05
And essentially what Bayes did
218
530000
3000
09:08
was to provide a mathematical way
219
533000
2000
09:10
using probability theory
220
535000
2000
09:12
to characterize, describe,
221
537000
2000
09:14
the way that scientists find out about the world.
222
539000
2000
09:16
So what scientists do
223
541000
2000
09:18
is they have a hypothesis that they think might be likely to start with.
224
543000
3000
09:21
They go out and test it against the evidence.
225
546000
2000
09:23
The evidence makes them change that hypothesis.
226
548000
2000
09:25
Then they test that new hypothesis
227
550000
2000
09:27
and so on and so forth.
228
552000
2000
09:29
And what Bayes showed was a mathematical way that you could do that.
229
554000
3000
09:32
And that mathematics is at the core
230
557000
2000
09:34
of the best machine learning programs that we have now.
231
559000
2000
09:36
And some 10 years ago,
232
561000
2000
09:38
I suggested that babies might be doing the same thing.
233
563000
4000
09:42
So if you want to know what's going on
234
567000
2000
09:44
underneath those beautiful brown eyes,
235
569000
2000
09:46
I think it actually looks something like this.
236
571000
2000
09:48
This is Reverend Bayes's notebook.
237
573000
2000
09:50
So I think those babies are actually making complicated calculations
238
575000
3000
09:53
with conditional probabilities that they're revising
239
578000
3000
09:56
to figure out how the world works.
240
581000
2000
09:58
All right, now that might seem like an even taller order to actually demonstrate.
241
583000
4000
10:02
Because after all, if you ask even grownups about statistics,
242
587000
2000
10:04
they look extremely stupid.
243
589000
2000
10:06
How could it be that children are doing statistics?
244
591000
3000
10:09
So to test this we used a machine that we have
245
594000
2000
10:11
called the Blicket Detector.
246
596000
2000
10:13
This is a box that lights up and plays music
247
598000
2000
10:15
when you put some things on it and not others.
248
600000
3000
10:18
And using this very simple machine,
249
603000
2000
10:20
my lab and others have done dozens of studies
250
605000
2000
10:22
showing just how good babies are
251
607000
2000
10:24
at learning about the world.
252
609000
2000
10:26
Let me mention just one
253
611000
2000
10:28
that we did with Tumar Kushner, my student.
254
613000
2000
10:30
If I showed you this detector,
255
615000
2000
10:32
you would be likely to think to begin with
256
617000
2000
10:34
that the way to make the detector go
257
619000
2000
10:36
would be to put a block on top of the detector.
258
621000
3000
10:39
But actually, this detector
259
624000
2000
10:41
works in a bit of a strange way.
260
626000
2000
10:43
Because if you wave a block over the top of the detector,
261
628000
3000
10:46
something you wouldn't ever think of to begin with,
262
631000
3000
10:49
the detector will actually activate two out of three times.
263
634000
3000
10:52
Whereas, if you do the likely thing, put the block on the detector,
264
637000
3000
10:55
it will only activate two out of six times.
265
640000
4000
10:59
So the unlikely hypothesis
266
644000
2000
11:01
actually has stronger evidence.
267
646000
2000
11:03
It looks as if the waving
268
648000
2000
11:05
is a more effective strategy than the other strategy.
269
650000
2000
11:07
So we did just this; we gave four year-olds this pattern of evidence,
270
652000
3000
11:10
and we just asked them to make it go.
271
655000
2000
11:12
And sure enough, the four year-olds used the evidence
272
657000
3000
11:15
to wave the object on top of the detector.
273
660000
3000
11:18
Now there are two things that are really interesting about this.
274
663000
3000
11:21
The first one is, again, remember, these are four year-olds.
275
666000
3000
11:24
They're just learning how to count.
276
669000
2000
11:26
But unconsciously,
277
671000
2000
11:28
they're doing these quite complicated calculations
278
673000
2000
11:30
that will give them a conditional probability measure.
279
675000
3000
11:33
And the other interesting thing
280
678000
2000
11:35
is that they're using that evidence
281
680000
2000
11:37
to get to an idea, get to a hypothesis about the world,
282
682000
3000
11:40
that seems very unlikely to begin with.
283
685000
3000
11:43
And in studies we've just been doing in my lab, similar studies,
284
688000
3000
11:46
we've show that four year-olds are actually better
285
691000
2000
11:48
at finding out an unlikely hypothesis
286
693000
3000
11:51
than adults are when we give them exactly the same task.
287
696000
3000
11:54
So in these circumstances,
288
699000
2000
11:56
the children are using statistics to find out about the world,
289
701000
3000
11:59
but after all, scientists also do experiments,
290
704000
3000
12:02
and we wanted to see if children are doing experiments.
291
707000
3000
12:05
When children do experiments we call it "getting into everything"
292
710000
3000
12:08
or else "playing."
293
713000
2000
12:10
And there's been a bunch of interesting studies recently
294
715000
3000
12:13
that have shown this playing around
295
718000
3000
12:16
is really a kind of experimental research program.
296
721000
2000
12:18
Here's one from Cristine Legare's lab.
297
723000
3000
12:21
What Cristine did was use our Blicket Detectors.
298
726000
3000
12:24
And what she did was show children
299
729000
2000
12:26
that yellow ones made it go and red ones didn't,
300
731000
2000
12:28
and then she showed them an anomaly.
301
733000
3000
12:31
And what you'll see
302
736000
2000
12:33
is that this little boy will go through five hypotheses
303
738000
3000
12:36
in the space of two minutes.
304
741000
3000
12:39
(Video) Boy: How about this?
305
744000
3000
12:43
Same as the other side.
306
748000
3000
12:46
Alison Gopnik: Okay, so his first hypothesis has just been falsified.
307
751000
4000
12:55
(Laughter)
308
760000
2000
12:57
Boy: This one lighted up, and this one nothing.
309
762000
3000
13:00
AG: Okay, he's got his experimental notebook out.
310
765000
3000
13:06
Boy: What's making this light up.
311
771000
4000
13:11
(Laughter)
312
776000
9000
13:20
I don't know.
313
785000
2000
13:22
AG: Every scientist will recognize that expression of despair.
314
787000
4000
13:26
(Laughter)
315
791000
3000
13:29
Boy: Oh, it's because this needs to be like this,
316
794000
6000
13:35
and this needs to be like this.
317
800000
2000
13:37
AG: Okay, hypothesis two.
318
802000
3000
13:40
Boy: That's why.
319
805000
2000
13:42
Oh.
320
807000
2000
13:44
(Laughter)
321
809000
5000
13:49
AG: Now this is his next idea.
322
814000
2000
13:51
He told the experimenter to do this,
323
816000
2000
13:53
to try putting it out onto the other location.
324
818000
4000
13:57
Not working either.
325
822000
2000
14:02
Boy: Oh, because the light goes only to here,
326
827000
4000
14:06
not here.
327
831000
3000
14:09
Oh, the bottom of this box
328
834000
3000
14:12
has electricity in here,
329
837000
2000
14:14
but this doesn't have electricity.
330
839000
2000
14:16
AG: Okay, that's a fourth hypothesis.
331
841000
2000
14:18
Boy: It's lighting up.
332
843000
2000
14:20
So when you put four.
333
845000
5000
14:26
So you put four on this one to make it light up
334
851000
3000
14:29
and two on this one to make it light up.
335
854000
2000
14:31
AG: Okay,there's his fifth hypothesis.
336
856000
2000
14:33
Now that is a particularly --
337
858000
3000
14:36
that is a particularly adorable and articulate little boy,
338
861000
3000
14:39
but what Cristine discovered is this is actually quite typical.
339
864000
3000
14:42
If you look at the way children play, when you ask them to explain something,
340
867000
3000
14:45
what they really do is do a series of experiments.
341
870000
3000
14:48
This is actually pretty typical of four year-olds.
342
873000
3000
14:51
Well, what's it like to be this kind of creature?
343
876000
3000
14:54
What's it like to be one of these brilliant butterflies
344
879000
3000
14:57
who can test five hypotheses in two minutes?
345
882000
3000
15:00
Well, if you go back to those psychologists and philosophers,
346
885000
3000
15:03
a lot of them have said
347
888000
2000
15:05
that babies and young children were barely conscious
348
890000
2000
15:07
if they were conscious at all.
349
892000
2000
15:09
And I think just the opposite is true.
350
894000
2000
15:11
I think babies and children are actually more conscious than we are as adults.
351
896000
3000
15:14
Now here's what we know about how adult consciousness works.
352
899000
3000
15:17
And adults' attention and consciousness
353
902000
2000
15:19
look kind of like a spotlight.
354
904000
2000
15:21
So what happens for adults
355
906000
2000
15:23
is we decide that something's relevant or important,
356
908000
2000
15:25
we should pay attention to it.
357
910000
2000
15:27
Our consciousness of that thing that we're attending to
358
912000
2000
15:29
becomes extremely bright and vivid,
359
914000
3000
15:32
and everything else sort of goes dark.
360
917000
2000
15:34
And we even know something about the way the brain does this.
361
919000
3000
15:37
So what happens when we pay attention
362
922000
2000
15:39
is that the prefrontal cortex, the sort of executive part of our brains,
363
924000
3000
15:42
sends a signal
364
927000
2000
15:44
that makes a little part of our brain much more flexible,
365
929000
2000
15:46
more plastic, better at learning,
366
931000
2000
15:48
and shuts down activity
367
933000
2000
15:50
in all the rest of our brains.
368
935000
2000
15:52
So we have a very focused, purpose-driven kind of attention.
369
937000
4000
15:56
If we look at babies and young children,
370
941000
2000
15:58
we see something very different.
371
943000
2000
16:00
I think babies and young children
372
945000
2000
16:02
seem to have more of a lantern of consciousness
373
947000
2000
16:04
than a spotlight of consciousness.
374
949000
2000
16:06
So babies and young children are very bad
375
951000
3000
16:09
at narrowing down to just one thing.
376
954000
3000
16:12
But they're very good at taking in lots of information
377
957000
3000
16:15
from lots of different sources at once.
378
960000
2000
16:17
And if you actually look in their brains,
379
962000
2000
16:19
you see that they're flooded with these neurotransmitters
380
964000
3000
16:22
that are really good at inducing learning and plasticity,
381
967000
2000
16:24
and the inhibitory parts haven't come on yet.
382
969000
3000
16:27
So when we say that babies and young children
383
972000
2000
16:29
are bad at paying attention,
384
974000
2000
16:31
what we really mean is that they're bad at not paying attention.
385
976000
4000
16:35
So they're bad at getting rid
386
980000
2000
16:37
of all the interesting things that could tell them something
387
982000
2000
16:39
and just looking at the thing that's important.
388
984000
2000
16:41
That's the kind of attention, the kind of consciousness,
389
986000
3000
16:44
that we might expect
390
989000
2000
16:46
from those butterflies who are designed to learn.
391
991000
2000
16:48
Well if we want to think about a way
392
993000
2000
16:50
of getting a taste of that kind of baby consciousness as adults,
393
995000
4000
16:54
I think the best thing is think about cases
394
999000
2000
16:56
where we're put in a new situation that we've never been in before --
395
1001000
3000
16:59
when we fall in love with someone new,
396
1004000
2000
17:01
or when we're in a new city for the first time.
397
1006000
3000
17:04
And what happens then is not that our consciousness contracts,
398
1009000
2000
17:06
it expands,
399
1011000
2000
17:08
so that those three days in Paris
400
1013000
2000
17:10
seem to be more full of consciousness and experience
401
1015000
2000
17:12
than all the months of being
402
1017000
2000
17:14
a walking, talking, faculty meeting-attending zombie back home.
403
1019000
4000
17:18
And by the way, that coffee,
404
1023000
2000
17:20
that wonderful coffee you've been drinking downstairs,
405
1025000
2000
17:22
actually mimics the effect
406
1027000
2000
17:24
of those baby neurotransmitters.
407
1029000
2000
17:26
So what's it like to be a baby?
408
1031000
2000
17:28
It's like being in love
409
1033000
2000
17:30
in Paris for the first time
410
1035000
2000
17:32
after you've had three double-espressos.
411
1037000
2000
17:34
(Laughter)
412
1039000
3000
17:37
That's a fantastic way to be,
413
1042000
2000
17:39
but it does tend to leave you waking up crying at three o'clock in the morning.
414
1044000
4000
17:43
(Laughter)
415
1048000
3000
17:46
Now it's good to be a grownup.
416
1051000
2000
17:48
I don't want to say too much about how wonderful babies are.
417
1053000
2000
17:50
It's good to be a grownup.
418
1055000
2000
17:52
We can do things like tie our shoelaces and cross the street by ourselves.
419
1057000
3000
17:55
And it makes sense that we put a lot of effort
420
1060000
2000
17:57
into making babies think like adults do.
421
1062000
4000
18:01
But if what we want is to be like those butterflies,
422
1066000
3000
18:04
to have open-mindedness, open learning,
423
1069000
3000
18:07
imagination, creativity, innovation,
424
1072000
2000
18:09
maybe at least some of the time
425
1074000
2000
18:11
we should be getting the adults
426
1076000
2000
18:13
to start thinking more like children.
427
1078000
2000
18:15
(Applause)
428
1080000
8000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Alison Gopnik - Child development psychologistAlison Gopnik takes us into the fascinating minds of babies and children, and shows us how much we understand before we even realize we do.
Why you should listen
What’s it really like to see through the eyes of a child? Are babies and young children just empty, irrational vessels to be formed into little adults, until they become the perfect images of ourselves? On the contrary, argues Alison Gopnik, professor of psychology and philosophy at the University of California at Berkeley.
The author of The Philosophical Baby, The Scientist in the Crib and other influential books on cognitive development, Gopnik presents evidence that babies and children are conscious of far more than we give them credit for, as they engage every sense and spend every waking moment discovering, filing away, analyzing and acting on information about how the world works. Gopnik’s work draws on psychological, neuroscientific, and philosophical developments in child development research to understand how the human mind learns, how and why we love, our ability to innovate, as well as giving us a deeper appreciation for the role of parenthood.
She says: "What's it like to be a baby? Being in love in Paris for the first time after you've had 3 double espressos."
Alison Gopnik | Speaker | TED.com