TED2007
Erin McKean: The joy of lexicography
Filmed:
Readability: 3.3
1,271,097 views
Is the beloved paper dictionary doomed to extinction? In this infectiously exuberant talk, leading lexicographer Erin McKean looks at the many ways today's print dictionary is poised for transformation.
Erin McKean - Dictionary editor
As the co-founder of Reverb Technologies, the maker of the online dictionary Wordnik, Erin McKean is reshaping how we interact with language itself. Full bio
As the co-founder of Reverb Technologies, the maker of the online dictionary Wordnik, Erin McKean is reshaping how we interact with language itself. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:25
Now, have any of y'all ever looked up this word?
0
0
4000
00:29
You know, in a dictionary? (Laughter) Yeah, that's what I thought.
1
4000
4000
00:33
How about this word?
2
8000
2000
00:35
Here, I'll show it to you.
3
10000
1000
00:36
Lexicography: the practice of compiling dictionaries.
4
11000
3000
00:39
Notice -- we're very specific -- that word "compile."
5
14000
3000
00:42
The dictionary is not carved out of a piece of granite,
6
17000
3000
00:45
out of a lump of rock. It's made up of lots of little bits.
7
20000
3000
00:48
It's little discrete --
8
23000
1000
00:49
that's spelled D-I-S-C-R-E-T-E -- bits.
9
24000
4000
00:53
And those bits are words.
10
28000
2000
00:55
Now one of the perks of being a lexicographer --
11
30000
4000
00:59
besides getting to come to TED -- is that you get to say really fun words,
12
34000
3000
01:02
like lexicographical.
13
37000
3000
01:05
Lexicographical has this great pattern:
14
40000
2000
01:07
it's called a double dactyl. And just by saying double dactyl,
15
42000
2000
01:09
I've sent the geek needle all the way into the red. (Laughter) (Applause)
16
44000
3000
01:12
But "lexicographical" is the same pattern as "higgledy-piggledy."
17
47000
4000
01:16
Right? It's a fun word to say,
18
51000
2000
01:18
and I get to say it a lot.
19
53000
3000
01:21
Now, one of the non-perks of being a lexicographer
20
56000
3000
01:24
is that people don't usually have a kind of warm, fuzzy, snuggly image of the dictionary.
21
59000
5000
01:29
Right? Nobody hugs their dictionaries.
22
64000
3000
01:32
But what people really often think about the dictionary is, they think more like this.
23
67000
7000
01:39
Just to let you know, I do not have a lexicographical whistle.
24
74000
3000
01:42
But people think that my job is to let the good words
25
77000
2000
01:44
make that difficult left-hand turn into the dictionary,
26
79000
3000
01:47
and keep the bad words out.
27
82000
2000
01:49
But the thing is, I don't want to be a traffic cop.
28
84000
3000
01:52
For one thing, I just do not do uniforms.
29
87000
4000
01:56
And for another, deciding what words are good
30
91000
4000
02:00
and what words are bad is actually not very easy.
31
95000
2000
02:02
And it's not very fun. And when parts of your job are not easy or fun,
32
97000
4000
02:06
you kind of look for an excuse not to do them.
33
101000
3000
02:09
So if I had to think of some kind of occupation
34
104000
5000
02:14
as a metaphor for my work, I would much rather be a fisherman.
35
109000
6000
02:20
I want to throw my big net into the deep, blue ocean of English
36
115000
3000
02:23
and see what marvelous creatures I can drag up from the bottom.
37
118000
4000
02:27
But why do people want me to direct traffic, when I would much rather go fishing?
38
122000
5000
02:32
Well, I blame the Queen.
39
127000
2000
02:34
Why do I blame the Queen?
40
129000
2000
02:36
Well, first of all, I blame the Queen because it's funny.
41
131000
2000
02:38
But secondly, I blame the Queen because
42
133000
3000
02:41
dictionaries have really not changed.
43
136000
2000
02:43
Our idea of what a dictionary is has not changed since her reign.
44
138000
2000
02:45
The only thing that Queen Victoria would not be amused by in modern dictionaries
45
140000
6000
02:51
is our inclusion of the F-word, which has happened
46
146000
3000
02:54
in American dictionaries since 1965.
47
149000
2000
02:56
So, there's this guy, right? Victorian era.
48
151000
3000
02:59
James Murray, first editor of the Oxford English Dictionary.
49
154000
2000
03:01
I do not have that hat. I wish I had that hat.
50
156000
3000
03:04
So he's really responsible for a lot of
51
159000
4000
03:08
what we consider modern in dictionaries today.
52
163000
2000
03:10
When a guy who looks like that, in that hat,
53
165000
3000
03:13
is the face of modernity, you have a problem.
54
168000
7000
03:20
And so, James Murray could get a job on any dictionary today.
55
175000
2000
03:22
There'd be virtually no learning curve.
56
177000
3000
03:25
And of course, a few of us are saying: okay, computers!
57
180000
2000
03:27
Computers! What about computers?
58
182000
2000
03:29
The thing about computers is, I love computers.
59
184000
2000
03:31
I mean, I'm a huge geek, I love computers.
60
186000
2000
03:33
I would go on a hunger strike before I let them take away Google Book Search from me.
61
188000
4000
03:37
But computers don't do much else other than
62
192000
2000
03:39
speed up the process of compiling dictionaries.
63
194000
4000
03:43
They don't change the end result.
64
198000
4000
03:47
Because what a dictionary is,
65
202000
3000
03:50
is it's Victorian design merged with a little bit of modern propulsion.
66
205000
3000
03:53
It's steampunk. What we have is an electric velocipede.
67
208000
6000
03:59
You know, we have Victorian design with an engine on it. That's all!
68
214000
3000
04:02
The design has not changed.
69
217000
3000
04:05
And OK, what about online dictionaries, right?
70
220000
2000
04:07
Online dictionaries must be different.
71
222000
3000
04:10
This is the Oxford English Dictionary Online, one of the best online dictionaries.
72
225000
2000
04:12
This is my favorite word, by the way.
73
227000
1000
04:13
Erinaceous: pertaining to the hedgehog family; of the nature of a hedgehog.
74
228000
5000
04:18
Very useful word. So, look at that.
75
233000
6000
04:24
Online dictionaries right now are paper thrown up on a screen.
76
239000
2000
04:26
This is flat. Look how many links there are in the actual entry: two!
77
241000
5000
04:31
Right? Those little buttons,
78
246000
2000
04:33
I had them all expanded except for the date chart.
79
248000
3000
04:36
So there's not very much going on here.
80
251000
2000
04:38
There's not a lot of clickiness.
81
253000
2000
04:40
And in fact, online dictionaries replicate
82
255000
3000
04:43
almost all the problems of print, except for searchability.
83
258000
3000
04:46
And when you improve searchability,
84
261000
2000
04:48
you actually take away the one advantage of print, which is serendipity.
85
263000
3000
04:51
Serendipity is when you find things you weren't looking for,
86
266000
3000
04:54
because finding what you are looking for is so damned difficult.
87
269000
3000
04:57
So -- (Laughter) (Applause) -- now, when you think about this,
88
272000
9000
05:06
what we have here is a ham butt problem.
89
281000
3000
05:09
Does everyone know the ham butt problem?
90
284000
2000
05:11
Woman's making a ham for a big, family dinner.
91
286000
2000
05:13
She goes to cut the butt off the ham and throw it away,
92
288000
2000
05:15
and she looks at this piece of ham and she's like,
93
290000
1000
05:16
"This is a perfectly good piece of ham. Why am I throwing this away?"
94
291000
2000
05:18
She thought, "Well, my mom always did this."
95
293000
2000
05:20
So she calls up mom, and she says,
96
295000
1000
05:21
"Mom, why'd you cut the butt off the ham, when you're making a ham?"
97
296000
2000
05:23
She says, "I don't know, my mom always did it!"
98
298000
3000
05:26
So they call grandma, and grandma says,
99
301000
2000
05:28
"My pan was too small!" (Laughter)
100
303000
4000
05:32
So, it's not that we have good words and bad words.
101
307000
4000
05:36
We have a pan that's too small!
102
311000
3000
05:39
You know, that ham butt is delicious! There's no reason to throw it away.
103
314000
2000
05:41
The bad words -- see, when people think about a place
104
316000
3000
05:44
and they don't find a place on the map,
105
319000
2000
05:46
they think, "This map sucks!"
106
321000
2000
05:48
When they find a nightspot or a bar, and it's not in the guidebook,
107
323000
2000
05:50
they're like, "Ooh, this place must be cool! It's not in the guidebook."
108
325000
3000
05:53
When they find a word that's not in the dictionary, they think,
109
328000
3000
05:56
"This must be a bad word." Why? It's more likely to be a bad dictionary.
110
331000
5000
06:01
Why are you blaming the ham for being too big for the pan?
111
336000
5000
06:06
So, you can't get a smaller ham.
112
341000
3000
06:09
The English language is as big as it is.
113
344000
3000
06:12
So, if you have a ham butt problem,
114
347000
2000
06:14
and you're thinking about the ham butt problem,
115
349000
2000
06:16
the conclusion that it leads you to is inexorable and counterintuitive:
116
351000
5000
06:21
paper is the enemy of words.
117
356000
3000
06:24
How can this be? I mean, I love books. I really love books.
118
359000
4000
06:28
Some of my best friends are books.
119
363000
2000
06:30
But the book is not the best shape for the dictionary.
120
365000
5000
06:35
Now they're going to think "Oh, boy.
121
370000
2000
06:37
People are going to take away my beautiful, paper dictionaries?"
122
372000
3000
06:40
No. There will still be paper dictionaries.
123
375000
2000
06:42
When we had cars -- when cars became the dominant mode of transportation,
124
377000
4000
06:46
we didn't round up all the horses and shoot them.
125
381000
3000
06:49
You know, there're still going to be paper dictionaries,
126
384000
2000
06:51
but it's not going to be the dominant dictionary.
127
386000
3000
06:54
The book-shaped dictionary is not going to be the only shape
128
389000
3000
06:57
dictionaries come in. And it's not going to be
129
392000
2000
06:59
the prototype for the shapes dictionaries come in.
130
394000
4000
07:03
So, think about it this way: if you've got an artificial constraint,
131
398000
4000
07:07
artificial constraints lead to
132
402000
4000
07:11
arbitrary distinctions and a skewed worldview.
133
406000
4000
07:15
What if biologists could only study animals
134
410000
3000
07:18
that made people go, "Aww." Right?
135
413000
2000
07:20
What if we made aesthetic judgments about animals,
136
415000
2000
07:22
and only the ones we thought were cute were the ones that we could study?
137
417000
5000
07:27
We'd know a whole lot about charismatic megafauna,
138
422000
4000
07:31
and not very much about much else.
139
426000
2000
07:33
And I think this is a problem.
140
428000
2000
07:35
I think we should study all the words,
141
430000
2000
07:37
because when you think about words, you can make beautiful expressions
142
432000
5000
07:42
from very humble parts.
143
437000
4000
07:46
Lexicography is really more about material science.
144
441000
4000
07:50
We are studying the tolerances of the materials
145
445000
3000
07:53
that you use to build the structure of your expression:
146
448000
3000
07:56
your speeches and your writing. And then, often people say to me,
147
451000
7000
08:03
"Well, OK, how do I know that this word is real?"
148
458000
5000
08:08
They think, "OK, if we think words are the tools
149
463000
7000
08:15
that we use to build the expressions of our thoughts,
150
470000
2000
08:17
how can you say that screwdrivers are better than hammers?
151
472000
3000
08:20
How can you say that a sledgehammer is better than a ball-peen hammer?"
152
475000
3000
08:23
They're just the right tools for the job.
153
478000
3000
08:26
And so people say to me, "How do I know if a word is real?"
154
481000
3000
08:29
You know, anybody who's read a children's book
155
484000
3000
08:32
knows that love makes things real.
156
487000
4000
08:36
If you love a word, use it. That makes it real.
157
491000
5000
08:41
Being in the dictionary is an artificial distinction.
158
496000
3000
08:44
It doesn't make a word any more real than any other way.
159
499000
3000
08:47
If you love a word, it becomes real.
160
502000
4000
08:51
So if we're not worrying about directing traffic,
161
506000
3000
08:54
if we've transcended paper, if we are worrying less
162
509000
5000
08:59
about control and more about description,
163
514000
4000
09:03
then we can think of the English language
164
518000
2000
09:05
as being this beautiful mobile.
165
520000
3000
09:08
And any time one of those little parts of the mobile changes,
166
523000
2000
09:10
is touched, any time you touch a word,
167
525000
3000
09:13
you use it in a new context, you give it a new connotation,
168
528000
2000
09:15
you verb it, you make the mobile move.
169
530000
3000
09:18
You didn't break it. It's just in a new position,
170
533000
4000
09:22
and that new position can be just as beautiful.
171
537000
3000
09:25
Now, if you're no longer a traffic cop --
172
540000
4000
09:29
the problem with being a traffic cop is
173
544000
2000
09:31
there can only be so many traffic cops in any one intersection,
174
546000
3000
09:34
or the cars get confused. Right?
175
549000
3000
09:37
But if your goal is no longer to direct the traffic,
176
552000
3000
09:40
but maybe to count the cars that go by, then more eyeballs are better.
177
555000
4000
09:44
You can ask for help!
178
559000
2000
09:46
If you ask for help, you get more done. And we really need help.
179
561000
4000
09:50
Library of Congress: 17 million books,
180
565000
3000
09:53
of which half are in English.
181
568000
3000
09:56
If only one out of every 10 of those books
182
571000
4000
10:00
had a word that's not in the dictionary in it,
183
575000
2000
10:02
that would be equivalent to more than two unabridged dictionaries.
184
577000
3000
10:05
And I find an un-dictionaried word --
185
580000
3000
10:08
a word like "un-dictionaried," for example --
186
583000
2000
10:10
in almost every book I read. What about newspapers?
187
585000
5000
10:15
Newspaper archive goes back to 1759,
188
590000
5000
10:20
58.1 million newspaper pages. If only one in 100
189
595000
5000
10:25
of those pages had an un-dictionaried word on it,
190
600000
3000
10:28
it would be an entire other OED.
191
603000
3000
10:31
That's 500,000 more words. So that's a lot.
192
606000
5000
10:36
And I'm not even talking about magazines. I'm not talking about blogs --
193
611000
3000
10:39
and I find more new words on BoingBoing in a given week
194
614000
2000
10:41
than I do Newsweek or Time.
195
616000
2000
10:43
There's a lot going on there.
196
618000
2000
10:45
And I'm not even talking about polysemy,
197
620000
2000
10:47
which is the greedy habit some words have of taking
198
622000
3000
10:50
more than one meaning for themselves.
199
625000
5000
10:55
So if you think of the word "set," a set can be a badger's burrow,
200
630000
4000
10:59
a set can be one of the pleats in an Elizabethan ruff,
201
634000
3000
11:02
and there's one numbered definition in the OED.
202
637000
2000
11:04
The OED has 33 different numbered definitions for set.
203
639000
3000
11:07
Tiny, little word, 33 numbered definitions.
204
642000
3000
11:10
One of them is just labeled "miscellaneous technical senses."
205
645000
5000
11:15
Do you know what that says to me?
206
650000
1000
11:16
That says to me, it was Friday afternoon and somebody wanted to go down the pub. (Laughter)
207
651000
5000
11:21
That's a lexicographical cop out,
208
656000
2000
11:23
to say, "miscellaneous technical senses."
209
658000
2000
11:25
So, we have all these words, and we really need help!
210
660000
4000
11:29
And the thing is, we could ask for help --
211
664000
3000
11:32
asking for help's not that hard.
212
667000
1000
11:33
I mean, lexicography is not rocket science.
213
668000
3000
11:36
See, I just gave you a lot of words and a lot of numbers,
214
671000
3000
11:39
and this is more of a visual explanation.
215
674000
2000
11:41
If we think of the dictionary as being the map of the English language,
216
676000
3000
11:44
these bright spots are what we know about,
217
679000
2000
11:46
and the dark spots are where we are in the dark.
218
681000
3000
11:49
If that was the map of all the words in American English, we don't know very much.
219
684000
5000
11:54
And we don't even know the shape of the language.
220
689000
3000
11:57
If this was the dictionary -- if this was the map of American English --
221
692000
3000
12:00
look, we have a kind of lumpy idea of Florida,
222
695000
3000
12:03
but there's no California!
223
698000
3000
12:06
We're missing California from American English.
224
701000
3000
12:09
We just don't know enough, and we don't even know that we're missing California.
225
704000
5000
12:14
We don't even see that there's a gap on the map.
226
709000
2000
12:16
So again, lexicography is not rocket science.
227
711000
3000
12:19
But even if it were, rocket science is being done
228
714000
3000
12:22
by dedicated amateurs these days. You know?
229
717000
4000
12:26
It can't be that hard to find some words!
230
721000
4000
12:30
So, enough scientists in other disciplines
231
725000
3000
12:33
are really asking people to help, and they're doing a good job of it.
232
728000
3000
12:36
For instance, there's eBird, where amateur birdwatchers
233
731000
2000
12:38
can upload information about their bird sightings.
234
733000
2000
12:40
And then, ornithologists can go
235
735000
2000
12:42
and help track populations, migrations, etc.
236
737000
3000
12:45
And there's this guy, Mike Oates. Mike Oates lives in the U.K.
237
740000
3000
12:48
He's a director of an electroplating company.
238
743000
4000
12:52
He's found more than 140 comets.
239
747000
3000
12:55
He's found so many comets, they named a comet after him.
240
750000
3000
12:58
It's kind of out past Mars. It's a hike.
241
753000
1000
12:59
I don't think he's getting his picture taken there anytime soon.
242
754000
2000
13:01
But he found 140 comets without a telescope.
243
756000
4000
13:05
He downloaded data from the NASA SOHO satellite,
244
760000
3000
13:08
and that's how he found them.
245
763000
2000
13:10
If we can find comets without a telescope,
246
765000
4000
13:14
shouldn't we be able to find words?
247
769000
2000
13:16
Now, y'all know where I'm going with this.
248
771000
2000
13:18
Because I'm going to the Internet, which is where everybody goes.
249
773000
3000
13:21
And the Internet is great for collecting words,
250
776000
2000
13:23
because the Internet's full of collectors.
251
778000
1000
13:24
And this is a little-known technological fact about the Internet,
252
779000
3000
13:27
but the Internet is actually made up of words and enthusiasm.
253
782000
3000
13:30
And words and enthusiasm actually happen to be
254
785000
5000
13:35
the recipe for lexicography. Isn't that great?
255
790000
3000
13:38
So there are a lot of really good word-collecting sites out there right now,
256
793000
4000
13:42
but the problem with some of them is that they're not scientific enough.
257
797000
2000
13:44
They show the word, but they don't show any context.
258
799000
3000
13:47
Where did it come from? Who said it?
259
802000
2000
13:49
What newspaper was it in? What book?
260
804000
2000
13:51
Because a word is like an archaeological artifact.
261
806000
4000
13:55
If you don't know the provenance or the source of the artifact,
262
810000
3000
13:58
it's not science, it's a pretty thing to look at.
263
813000
3000
14:01
So a word without its source is like a cut flower.
264
816000
3000
14:04
You know, it's pretty to look at for a while, but then it dies.
265
819000
4000
14:08
It dies too fast.
266
823000
1000
14:09
So, this whole time I've been saying,
267
824000
4000
14:13
"The dictionary, the dictionary, the dictionary, the dictionary."
268
828000
2000
14:15
Not "a dictionary," or "dictionaries." And that's because,
269
830000
3000
14:18
well, people use the dictionary to stand for the whole language.
270
833000
3000
14:21
They use it synecdochically.
271
836000
3000
14:24
And one of the problems of knowing a word like "synecdochically"
272
839000
3000
14:27
is that you really want an excuse to say "synecdochically."
273
842000
3000
14:30
This whole talk has just been an excuse to get me to the point
274
845000
2000
14:32
where I could say "synecdochically" to all of you.
275
847000
2000
14:34
So I'm really sorry. But when you use a part of something --
276
849000
3000
14:37
like the dictionary is a part of the language,
277
852000
2000
14:39
or a flag stands for the United States, it's a symbol of the country --
278
854000
5000
14:44
then you're using it synecdochically.
279
859000
4000
14:48
But the thing is, we could make the dictionary the whole language.
280
863000
4000
14:52
If we get a bigger pan, then we can put all the words in.
281
867000
4000
14:56
We can put in all the meanings.
282
871000
4000
15:00
Doesn't everyone want more meaning in their lives?
283
875000
4000
15:04
And we can make the dictionary not just be a symbol of the language --
284
879000
4000
15:08
we can make it be the whole language.
285
883000
3000
15:11
You see, what I'm really hoping for is that my son,
286
886000
2000
15:13
who turns seven this month -- I want him to barely remember
287
888000
3000
15:16
that this is the form factor that dictionaries used to come in.
288
891000
5000
15:21
This is what dictionaries used to look like.
289
896000
2000
15:23
I want him to think of this kind of dictionary as an eight-track tape.
290
898000
2000
15:25
It's a format that died because it wasn't useful enough.
291
900000
4000
15:29
It wasn't really what people needed.
292
904000
3000
15:32
And the thing is, if we can put in all the words,
293
907000
3000
15:35
no longer have that artificial distinction between good and bad,
294
910000
4000
15:39
we can really describe the language like scientists.
295
914000
3000
15:42
We can leave the aesthetic judgments to the writers and the speakers.
296
917000
2000
15:44
If we can do that, then I can spend all my time fishing,
297
919000
4000
15:48
and I don't have to be a traffic cop anymore.
298
923000
5000
15:53
Thank you very much for your kind attention.
299
928000
2000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Erin McKean - Dictionary editorAs the co-founder of Reverb Technologies, the maker of the online dictionary Wordnik, Erin McKean is reshaping how we interact with language itself.
Why you should listen
Erin McKean's job as a lexicographer involves living in a constant state of research. She searches high and low -- from books to blogs, newspapers to cocktail parties -- for new words, new meanings for old words, or signs that old words have fallen out of use. In June of this year, she involved us all in the search by launching Wordnik, an online dictionary that houses all the traditionally accepted words and definitions, but also asks users to contribute new words and new uses for old words. Wordnik pulls real-time examples of word usage from Twitter, image representations from Flickr along with many more non-traditional, and highly useful, features.
Before Wordnik, McKean was one of the youngest editors of the New Oxford American Dictionary. She continues to serve as the editor of the language quarterly Verbatim ("language and linguistics for the layperson since 1974") and is the author of multiple books, including That's Amore and the entire Weird and Wonderful Words series. All that, and she maintains multiple blogs, too: McKean is the keen observationalist behind A Dress a Day and Dictionary Evangelist. Is there anything she can't do? Surprisingly, she is notoriously bad at Scrabble.
Erin McKean | Speaker | TED.com