TEDGlobal 2005
Jimmy Wales: The birth of Wikipedia
Filmed:
Readability: 4.2
1,381,290 views
Jimmy Wales recalls how he assembled "a ragtag band of volunteers," gave them tools for collaborating and created Wikipedia, the self-organizing, self-correcting, never-finished online encyclopedia.
Jimmy Wales - Founder of Wikipedia
With a vision for a free online encyclopedia, Wales assembled legions of volunteer contributors, gave them tools for collaborating, and created the self-organizing, self-correcting, ever-expanding, multilingual encyclopedia of the future. Full bio
With a vision for a free online encyclopedia, Wales assembled legions of volunteer contributors, gave them tools for collaborating, and created the self-organizing, self-correcting, ever-expanding, multilingual encyclopedia of the future. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:25
In 1962, Charles Van Doren, who was later a senior editor of Britannica,
0
0
4000
00:29
said the ideal encyclopedia should be radical -- it should stop being safe.
1
4000
4000
00:33
But if you know anything about the history of Britannica since 1962,
2
8000
3000
00:36
it was anything but radical:
3
11000
2000
00:38
still a very completely safe, stodgy type of encyclopedia.
4
13000
5000
00:43
Wikipedia, on the other hand, begins with a very radical idea,
5
18000
5000
00:48
and that's for all of us to imagine a world
6
23000
2000
00:50
in which every single person on the planet
7
25000
2000
00:52
is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge.
8
27000
3000
00:55
And that's what we're doing. So Wikipedia --
9
30000
2000
00:58
you just saw the little demonstration of it --
10
33000
2000
01:00
it's a freely licensed encyclopedia. It's written by thousands of volunteers
11
35000
4000
01:04
all over the world in many, many languages.
12
39000
2000
01:06
It's written using Wiki software --
13
41000
2000
01:08
which is the type of software he just demonstrated
14
43000
3000
01:11
-- so anyone can quickly edit and save,
15
46000
2000
01:13
and it goes live on the Internet immediately.
16
48000
3000
01:16
And everything about Wikipedia is managed by virtually an all-volunteer staff.
17
51000
5000
01:21
So when Yochai is talking about new methods of organization,
18
56000
4000
01:25
he's exactly describing Wikipedia. And what I'm going to do today
19
60000
4000
01:29
is tell you a little bit more about how it really works on the inside.
20
64000
4000
01:33
So Wikipedia's owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, which I founded,
21
68000
5000
01:38
a nonprofit organization. And our goal, the core aim of the Wikimedia Foundation,
22
73000
5000
01:43
is to get a free encyclopedia to every single person on the planet.
23
78000
3000
01:46
And so if you think about what that means,
24
81000
2000
01:48
it means a lot more than just building a cool website.
25
83000
3000
01:51
We're really interested in all the issues of the digital divide, poverty worldwide,
26
86000
4000
01:55
empowering people everywhere to have the information that they need
27
90000
4000
01:59
to make good decisions.
28
94000
1000
02:00
And so we're going to have to do a lot of work that goes beyond just the Internet.
29
95000
4000
02:04
And so that's a big part of why we've chosen the free licensing model,
30
99000
4000
02:08
because that empowers local entrepreneurs --
31
103000
2000
02:10
or anyone who wants to, can take our content
32
105000
2000
02:12
and do anything they like with it -- you can copy it, redistribute it
33
107000
4000
02:16
and you can do it commercially or non-commercially.
34
111000
2000
02:18
So there's a lot of opportunities that are going to arise around Wikipedia
35
113000
4000
02:22
all over the world.
36
117000
2000
02:24
We're funded by donations from the public,
37
119000
2000
02:26
and one of the more interesting things about that
38
121000
3000
02:29
is how little money it actually takes to run Wikipedia.
39
124000
3000
02:32
So Yochai showed you the graph of what the cost of a printing press was.
40
127000
5000
02:37
And I'm going to tell you what the cost of Wikipedia is,
41
132000
4000
02:41
but first I'll show you how big it is.
42
136000
2000
02:43
So we've got over 600,000 articles in English.
43
138000
4000
02:47
We've got two million total articles across many, many different languages.
44
142000
4000
02:51
The biggest languages are German, Japanese, French --
45
146000
3000
02:54
all the Western European languages are quite big.
46
149000
4000
02:58
But only around one-third of all of our traffic to our web
47
153000
3000
03:01
clusters to the English Wikipedia,
48
156000
2000
03:03
which is surprising to a lot of people.
49
158000
2000
03:05
A lot of people think in a very English-centric way on the Internet,
50
160000
4000
03:09
but for us, we're truly global. We're in many, many languages.
51
164000
3000
03:13
How popular we've gotten to be -- we're a top 50 website
52
168000
3000
03:16
and we're more popular than the New York Times.
53
171000
2000
03:18
So this is where we get to Yochai's discussion.
54
173000
4000
03:23
This shows the growth of Wikipedia -- we're the blue line there --
55
178000
3000
03:26
and then this is the New York Times over there.
56
181000
3000
03:29
And what's interesting about this is the New York Times website is a huge,
57
184000
3000
03:32
enormous corporate operation with -- I have no idea how many hundreds of employees.
58
187000
4000
03:36
We have exactly one employee,
59
191000
3000
03:39
and that employee is our lead software developer.
60
194000
3000
03:42
And he's only been our employee since January 2005,
61
197000
3000
03:45
all the other growth before that.
62
200000
2000
03:47
So the servers are managed by a rag-tag band of volunteers;
63
202000
3000
03:50
all the editing is done by volunteers.
64
205000
2000
03:52
And the way that we're organized
65
207000
2000
03:54
is not like any traditional organization you can imagine.
66
209000
3000
03:57
People are always asking, "Well, who's in charge of this?"
67
212000
2000
03:59
or "Who does that?" And the answer is: anybody who wants to pitch in.
68
214000
5000
04:04
It's a very unusual and chaotic thing.
69
219000
3000
04:07
We've got over 90 servers now in three locations.
70
222000
3000
04:10
These are managed by volunteer system administrators who are online.
71
225000
4000
04:14
I can go online any time of the day or night
72
229000
3000
04:17
and see eight to 10 people waiting for me
73
232000
4000
04:21
to ask a question or something, anything about the servers.
74
236000
4000
04:25
You could never afford to do this in a company.
75
240000
2000
04:27
You could never afford to have a standby crew of people
76
242000
4000
04:31
24 hours a day and do what we're doing at Wikipedia.
77
246000
4000
04:35
So we're doing around 1.4 billion page views monthly,
78
250000
3000
04:38
so it's really gotten to be a huge thing.
79
253000
3000
04:41
And everything is managed by the volunteers.
80
256000
2000
04:43
And the total monthly cost for our bandwidth is about 5,000 dollars.
81
258000
5000
04:48
And that's essentially our main cost.
82
263000
2000
04:50
We could actually do without the employee. We actually --
83
265000
3000
04:53
we hired Brian because he was working part-time for two years
84
268000
3000
04:56
and full-time at Wikipedia,
85
271000
2000
04:58
so we actually hired him so he could get a life and go to the movies sometimes.
86
273000
4000
05:03
So the big question when you've got this really chaotic organization is,
87
278000
3000
05:06
why isn't it all rubbish? Why is the website as good as it is?
88
281000
4000
05:10
First of all, how good is it? Well, it's pretty good. It isn't perfect,
89
285000
3000
05:13
but it's much, much better than you would expect,
90
288000
3000
05:16
given our completely chaotic model.
91
291000
2000
05:18
So when you saw him make a ridiculous edit to the page about me,
92
293000
3000
05:21
you think, oh, this is obviously just going to degenerate into rubbish.
93
296000
4000
05:25
But when we've seen quality tests -- and there haven't been enough of these yet
94
300000
4000
05:29
and I'm really encouraging people to do more,
95
304000
2000
05:31
comparing Wikipedia to traditional things -- we win hands down.
96
306000
4000
05:35
So a German magazine compared German Wikipedia,
97
310000
3000
05:38
which is really much, much smaller than English,
98
313000
3000
05:41
to Microsoft Encarta and to Brockhaus Multimedia,
99
316000
4000
05:45
and we won across the board.
100
320000
2000
05:47
They hired experts to come and look at articles and compare the quality,
101
322000
3000
05:50
and we were very pleased with that result.
102
325000
3000
05:53
So a lot of people have heard about the Wikipedia Bush-Kerry controversy.
103
328000
4000
05:57
The media has covered this somewhat extensively.
104
332000
4000
06:01
It started out with an article in Red Herring.
105
336000
3000
06:04
The reporters called me up and they -- I mean, I have to say
106
339000
3000
06:07
they spelled my name right, but they really wanted to say,
107
342000
5000
06:12
the Bush-Kerry election is so contentious,
108
347000
2000
06:14
it's tearing apart the Wikipedia community. And so they quote me as saying,
109
349000
4000
06:18
"They're the most contentious in the history of Wikipedia."
110
353000
3000
06:21
What I actually said is, they're not contentious at all.
111
356000
2000
06:23
So it's a slight misquote. (Laughter) The articles were edited quite heavily.
112
358000
6000
06:29
And it is true that we did have to lock the articles on a couple of occasions.
113
364000
3000
06:32
Time magazine recently reported that
114
367000
3000
06:35
"Extreme action sometimes has to be taken,
115
370000
3000
06:38
and Wales locked the entries on Kerry and Bush for most of 2004."
116
373000
5000
06:43
This came after I told the reporter that we had to lock it for --
117
378000
4000
06:47
occasionally a little bit here and there.
118
382000
2000
06:49
So the truth in general is that the kinds of controversies
119
384000
3000
06:52
that you would probably think we have within the Wikipedia community
120
387000
4000
06:56
are not really controversies at all.
121
391000
2000
06:58
Articles on controversial topics are edited a lot,
122
393000
3000
07:01
but they don't cause much controversy within the community.
123
396000
3000
07:04
And the reason for this is that most people understand the need for neutrality.
124
399000
5000
07:11
The real struggle is not between the right and the left --
125
406000
4000
07:15
that's where most people assume --
126
410000
2000
07:17
but it's between the party of the thoughtful and the party of the jerks.
127
412000
3000
07:20
And no side of the political spectrum has a monopoly on either of those qualities.
128
415000
4000
07:24
The actual truth about the specific Bush-Kerry incident
129
419000
4000
07:28
is that the Bush-Kerry articles
130
423000
2000
07:30
were locked less than one percent of the time in 2004,
131
425000
3000
07:33
and it wasn't because they were contentious;
132
428000
2000
07:35
it was just because there was routine vandalism --
133
430000
3000
07:38
which happens sometimes even on stage, people --
134
433000
4000
07:42
sometimes even reporters have reported to me that they vandalize Wikipedia
135
437000
3000
07:45
and were amazed that it was fixed so quickly.
136
440000
3000
07:48
And I said -- you know, I always say, please don't do that; that's not a good thing.
137
443000
4000
07:52
So how do we do this?
138
447000
2000
07:54
How do we manage the quality control?
139
449000
2000
07:56
How does it work?
140
451000
3000
07:59
So there's a few elements,
141
454000
3000
08:02
mostly social policies and some elements of the software.
142
457000
3000
08:05
So the biggest and the most important thing is our neutral point-of-view policy.
143
460000
4000
08:09
This is something that I set down from the very beginning,
144
464000
3000
08:12
as a core principle of the community that's completely not debatable.
145
467000
4000
08:16
It's a social concept of cooperation,
146
471000
3000
08:19
so we don't talk a lot about truth and objectivity.
147
474000
4000
08:23
The reason for this is if we say we're only going to write the "truth" about some topic,
148
478000
4000
08:27
that doesn't do us a damn bit of good of figuring out what to write,
149
482000
3000
08:30
because I don't agree with you about what's the truth.
150
485000
2000
08:32
But we have this jargon term of neutrality,
151
487000
3000
08:35
which has its own long history within the community,
152
490000
2000
08:37
which basically says, any time there's a controversial issue,
153
492000
4000
08:41
Wikipedia itself should not take a stand on the issue.
154
496000
3000
08:44
We should merely report on what reputable parties have said about it.
155
499000
3000
08:47
So this neutrality policy is really important for us,
156
502000
3000
08:50
because it empowers a community that is very diverse
157
505000
4000
08:54
to come together and actually get some work done.
158
509000
2000
08:56
So we have very diverse contributors in terms of political, religious,
159
511000
3000
08:59
cultural backgrounds.
160
514000
2000
09:01
By having this firm neutrality policy,
161
516000
2000
09:03
which is non-negotiable from the beginning,
162
518000
2000
09:05
we ensure that people can work together
163
520000
2000
09:07
and that the entries don't become simply a war
164
522000
2000
09:09
back and forth between the left and the right.
165
524000
3000
09:12
If you engage in that type of behavior,
166
527000
2000
09:14
you'll be asked to leave the community.
167
529000
2000
09:17
So real-time peer review.
168
532000
2000
09:19
Every single change on the site goes to the recent changes page.
169
534000
3000
09:22
So as soon as he made his change, it went to the recent changes page.
170
537000
3000
09:25
That recent changes page was also fed into IRC channel,
171
540000
4000
09:29
which is an Internet chat channel
172
544000
2000
09:31
that people are monitoring with various software tools.
173
546000
2000
09:35
And people can get RSS feeds --
174
550000
2000
09:37
they can get e-mail notifications of changes.
175
552000
3000
09:40
And then users can set up their own personal watch list.
176
555000
2000
09:42
So my page is on quite a few volunteers' watch lists,
177
557000
3000
09:45
because it is sometimes vandalized.
178
560000
2000
09:49
And therefore, what happens is someone will notice the change very quickly,
179
564000
4000
09:53
and then they'll just simply revert the change.
180
568000
4000
09:57
There's a new pages feed, for example,
181
572000
2000
09:59
so you can go to a certain page of Wikipedia
182
574000
2000
10:01
and see every new page as it's created.
183
576000
2000
10:03
This is really important, because a lot of new pages that get created
184
578000
2000
10:05
are just garbage that have to be deleted, you know, ASDFASDF.
185
580000
3000
10:08
But also that's some of the most interesting and fun things at Wikipedia,
186
583000
3000
10:11
some of the new articles.
187
586000
2000
10:13
People will start an article on some interesting topic,
188
588000
2000
10:15
other people will find that intriguing
189
590000
2000
10:17
and jump in and help and make it much better.
190
592000
2000
10:19
So we do have edits by anonymous users,
191
594000
2000
10:21
which is one of the most controversial and intriguing things about Wikipedia.
192
596000
4000
10:25
So Chris was able to do his change -- he didn't have to log in or anything;
193
600000
4000
10:29
he just went on the website and made a change.
194
604000
3000
10:32
But it turns out that only about 18 percent of all the edits to the website
195
607000
3000
10:35
are done by anonymous users.
196
610000
2000
10:37
And that's a really important thing to understand,
197
612000
2000
10:39
is that the vast majority of the edits that go on on the website
198
614000
3000
10:42
are from a very close-knit community of maybe 600 to 1,000 people
199
617000
4000
10:46
who are in constant communication.
200
621000
2000
10:48
And we have over 40 IRC channels, 40 mailing lists.
201
623000
2000
10:50
All these people know each other. They communicate; we have offline meetings.
202
625000
4000
10:54
These are the people who are doing the bulk of the site,
203
629000
2000
10:56
and they are, in a sense, semi-professionals at what they're doing,
204
631000
5000
11:01
that the standards we set for ourselves are equal to or higher than
205
636000
4000
11:05
professional standards of quality.
206
640000
2000
11:07
We don't always meet those standards,
207
642000
2000
11:09
but that's what we're striving for.
208
644000
2000
11:11
And so that tight community is who really cares for the site,
209
646000
3000
11:14
and these are some of the smartest people I've ever met.
210
649000
2000
11:16
Of course, it's my job to say that, but it's actually true.
211
651000
2000
11:18
The type of people who were drawn to writing an encyclopedia for fun
212
653000
4000
11:22
tend to be pretty smart people. (Laughter)
213
657000
2000
11:25
The tools and the software: there's lots of tools that allow us --
214
660000
2000
11:27
allow us, meaning the community -- to self-monitor and to monitor all the work.
215
662000
4000
11:31
This is an example of a page history on "flat earth,"
216
666000
2000
11:33
and you can see some changes that were made.
217
668000
3000
11:36
What's nice about this page is you can immediately take a look at this
218
671000
3000
11:39
and see, oh OK, I understand now.
219
674000
2000
11:41
When somebody goes and looks at -- they see that someone,
220
676000
3000
11:44
an anonymous IP number, made an edit to my page --
221
679000
2000
11:46
that sounds suspicious -- who is this person? Somebody looks at it --
222
681000
3000
11:49
they can immediately see highlighted in red all of the changes that took place,
223
684000
4000
11:53
to see, OK, well, these words have changed, things like this.
224
688000
4000
11:57
So that's one tool that we can use to very quickly monitor the history of a page.
225
692000
5000
12:02
Another thing that we do within the community
226
697000
3000
12:05
is we leave everything very open-ended.
227
700000
3000
12:08
Most of the social rules and the methods of work
228
703000
4000
12:12
are left completely open-ended in the software.
229
707000
2000
12:14
All of that stuff is just on Wiki pages.
230
709000
2000
12:16
And so there's nothing in the software that enforces the rules.
231
711000
3000
12:19
The example I've got up here is a Votes For Deletion page.
232
714000
3000
12:23
So, I mentioned earlier, people type ASDFASDF --
233
718000
3000
12:26
it needs to be deleted. Cases like that, the administrators just delete it.
234
721000
3000
12:29
There's no reason to have a big argument about it.
235
724000
2000
12:31
But you can imagine there's a lot of other areas where the question is,
236
726000
4000
12:35
is this notable enough to go in an encyclopedia?
237
730000
2000
12:37
Is the information verifiable? Is it a hoax? Is it true? Is it what?
238
732000
4000
12:41
So we needed a social method for figuring out the answer to this.
239
736000
3000
12:44
And so the method that arose organically within the community
240
739000
3000
12:47
is the Votes For Deletion page.
241
742000
2000
12:49
And in the particular example we have here, it's a film,
242
744000
2000
12:51
"Twisted Issues," and the first person says,
243
746000
2000
12:53
"Now this is supposedly a film. It fails the Google test miserably."
244
748000
4000
12:57
The Google test is, you look in Google and see if it's there,
245
752000
3000
13:00
because if something's not even in Google, it probably doesn't exist at all.
246
755000
4000
13:04
It's not a perfect rule, but it's a nice starting point for quick research.
247
759000
4000
13:09
So somebody says, "Delete it, please. Delete it -- it's not notable."
248
764000
3000
13:12
And then somebody says, "Wait, wait, wait, wait, I found it.
249
767000
2000
13:14
I found it in a book, 'Film Threat Video Guide:
250
769000
2000
13:16
the 20 Underground Films You Must See.'"
251
771000
2000
13:18
Oh, OK. So the next persons says, "Clean it up."
252
773000
2000
13:20
Somebody says, "I've found it on IMDB. Keep, keep, keep."
253
775000
4000
13:24
And what's interesting about this is that the software is --
254
779000
3000
13:27
these votes are just -- they're just text typed into a page.
255
782000
3000
13:30
This is not really a vote so much as it is a dialogue.
256
785000
5000
13:35
Now it is true that at the end of the day
257
790000
2000
13:37
an administrator can go through here and take a look at this and say,
258
792000
3000
13:40
OK, 18 deletes, two keeps: we'll delete it.
259
795000
3000
13:43
But in other cases, this could be 18 deletes and two keeps, and we would keep it,
260
798000
5000
13:48
because if those last two keeps say, "Wait a minute, wait a minute.
261
803000
2000
13:50
Nobody else saw this but I found it in a book,
262
805000
2000
13:52
and I found a link to a page that describes it, and I'm going to clean it up tomorrow,
263
807000
4000
13:56
so please don't delete it," then it would survive.
264
811000
3000
13:59
And it also matters who the people are who are voting.
265
814000
2000
14:01
Like I say, it's a tight knit community.
266
816000
2000
14:03
Down here at the bottom, "Keep, real movie," Rick Kay.
267
818000
2000
14:05
Rick Kay is a very famous Wikipedian
268
820000
3000
14:08
who does an enormous amount of work with vandalism, hoaxes
269
823000
3000
14:11
and votes for deletion.
270
826000
2000
14:13
His voice carries a lot of weight within the community
271
828000
3000
14:16
because he knows what he's doing.
272
831000
2000
14:18
So how's all this governed?
273
833000
2000
14:20
People really want to know about, OK, administrators, things like that.
274
835000
4000
14:24
So the Wikipedia governance model, the governance of the community,
275
839000
4000
14:28
is a very confusing, but a workable mix of consensus --
276
843000
4000
14:32
meaning we try not to vote on the content of articles,
277
847000
2000
14:34
because the majority view is not necessarily neutral.
278
849000
4000
14:38
Some amount of democracy, all of the administrators --
279
853000
2000
14:40
these are the people who have the ability to delete pages,
280
855000
3000
14:43
that doesn't mean that they have the right to delete pages;
281
858000
2000
14:45
they still have to follow all the rules -- but they're elected;
282
860000
3000
14:48
they're elected by the community. Sometimes people --
283
863000
2000
14:50
random trolls on the Internet -- like to accuse me of handpicking the administrators
284
865000
4000
14:54
to bias the content of the encyclopedia.
285
869000
2000
14:56
I always laugh at this, because I have no idea how they're elected, actually.
286
871000
4000
15:00
There's a certain amount of aristocracy.
287
875000
2000
15:02
And so you've got a hint of that when I mentioned, like,
288
877000
3000
15:05
Rick Kay's voice would carry a lot more weight than someone we don't know.
289
880000
3000
15:08
I give this talk sometimes with Angela, who was just re-elected
290
883000
4000
15:12
to the Board from the community -- to the Board of the Foundation,
291
887000
3000
15:15
with more than twice the votes of the person who didn't make it.
292
890000
4000
15:19
And I always embarrass her because I say, well, Angela, for example,
293
894000
4000
15:23
could get away with doing absolutely anything within Wikipedia,
294
898000
3000
15:26
because she's so admired and so powerful.
295
901000
2000
15:28
But the irony is, of course, that Angela can do this because she's the one person
296
903000
4000
15:32
who you know would never, ever, ever break any rules of Wikipedia.
297
907000
3000
15:35
And I also like to say she's the only person
298
910000
3000
15:38
who actually knows all the rules of Wikipedia, so ...
299
913000
3000
15:41
And then there's monarchy and that's my role on the community, so ...
300
916000
4000
15:46
I was describing this in Berlin once and the next day in the newspaper
301
921000
5000
15:51
the headline said, "I am the Queen of England."
302
926000
3000
15:54
And that's not exactly what I said (Laughter), but --
303
929000
3000
15:59
the point is my role in the community --
304
934000
2000
16:01
within the free software world
305
936000
3000
16:04
there's been a longstanding tradition of the "benevolent dictator" model.
306
939000
5000
16:09
So if you look at most of the major free software projects,
307
944000
3000
16:12
they have one single person in charge
308
947000
2000
16:14
who everyone agrees is the benevolent dictator.
309
949000
3000
16:17
Well, I don't like the term "benevolent dictator,"
310
952000
3000
16:20
and I don't think that it's my job or my role in the world of ideas
311
955000
3000
16:23
to be the dictator of the future of all human knowledge compiled by the world.
312
958000
5000
16:28
It just isn't appropriate.
313
963000
2000
16:30
But there is a need still for a certain amount of monarchy,
314
965000
3000
16:33
a certain amount of -- sometimes we have to make a decision,
315
968000
3000
16:36
and we don't want to get bogged down too heavily
316
971000
3000
16:39
in formal decision-making processes.
317
974000
2000
16:41
So as an example of why this has been --
318
976000
4000
16:45
or how this can be important:
319
980000
2000
16:47
we recently had a situation where a neo-Nazi website discovered Wikipedia,
320
982000
3000
16:50
and they said, "Oh, well, this is horrible, this Jewish conspiracy of a website
321
985000
5000
16:55
and we're going to get certain articles deleted that we don't like.
322
990000
3000
16:58
And we see they have a voting process, so we're going to send --
323
993000
2000
17:00
we have 40,000 members and we're going to send them over
324
995000
4000
17:04
and they're all going to vote and get these pages deleted."
325
999000
2000
17:06
Well, they managed to get 18 people to show up.
326
1001000
3000
17:09
That's neo-Nazi math for you.
327
1004000
2000
17:11
They always think they've got 40,000 members when they've got 18.
328
1006000
3000
17:14
But they managed to get 18 people to come and vote in a fairly absurd way
329
1009000
5000
17:19
to delete a perfectly valid article.
330
1014000
2000
17:21
Of course, the vote ended up being about 85 to 18,
331
1016000
3000
17:24
so there was no real danger to our democratic processes.
332
1019000
3000
17:27
On the other hand, people said, "But what are we going to do?
333
1022000
3000
17:30
I mean, this could happen and what if some group gets really seriously organized
334
1025000
4000
17:34
and comes in and wants to vote?"
335
1029000
2000
17:36
Then I said, "Well fuck it, we'll just change the rules."
336
1031000
3000
17:39
That's my job in the community: to say we won't allow our openness
337
1034000
5000
17:44
and freedom to undermine the quality of the content.
338
1039000
3000
17:47
And so as long as people trust me in my role,
339
1042000
3000
17:50
then that's a valid place for me.
340
1045000
2000
17:52
Of course, because of the free licensing, if I do a bad job,
341
1047000
4000
17:56
the volunteers are more than happy to take and leave --
342
1051000
2000
17:58
I can't tell anyone what to do.
343
1053000
2000
18:00
So the final point here is that to understand how Wikipedia works,
344
1055000
4000
18:04
it's important to understand that our Wiki model is the way we work,
345
1059000
4000
18:08
but we are not fanatical web anarchists. In fact,
346
1063000
4000
18:12
we're very flexible about the social methodology,
347
1067000
3000
18:15
because it's ultimately the passion of the community is for the quality of the work,
348
1070000
4000
18:19
not necessarily for the process that we use to generate it.
349
1074000
4000
18:23
Thank you.
350
1078000
2000
18:25
(Applause)
351
1080000
3000
18:28
Ben Saunders: Yeah, hi, Ben Saunders.
352
1083000
2000
18:30
Jimmy, you mentioned impartiality being a key to Wikipedia's success.
353
1085000
4000
18:34
It strikes me that much of the textbooks
354
1089000
4000
18:38
that are used to educate our children are inherently biased.
355
1093000
3000
18:41
Have you found Wikipedia being used by teachers,
356
1096000
4000
18:45
and how do you see Wikipedia changing education?
357
1100000
2000
18:47
Jimmy Wales: Yeah, so, a lot of teachers are beginning to use Wikipedia.
358
1102000
5000
18:52
There's a media storyline about Wikipedia, which I think is false.
359
1107000
4000
18:56
It builds on the storyline of bloggers versus newspapers.
360
1111000
3000
18:59
And the storyline is, there's this crazy thing, Wikipedia,
361
1114000
4000
19:03
but academics hate it and teachers hate it. And that turns out to not be true.
362
1118000
6000
19:09
The last time I got an e-mail from a journalist saying,
363
1124000
2000
19:11
"Why do academics hate Wikipedia?"
364
1126000
2000
19:13
I sent it from my Harvard email address,
365
1128000
2000
19:15
because I was recently appointed a fellow there.
366
1130000
2000
19:17
And I said, "Well, they don't all hate it." (Laughter)
367
1132000
3000
19:20
But I think there's going to be huge impacts.
368
1135000
3000
19:23
And we actually have a project
369
1138000
2000
19:25
that I'm personally really excited about,
370
1140000
2000
19:27
which is the Wiki books project,
371
1142000
2000
19:29
which is an effort to create textbooks in all the languages.
372
1144000
2000
19:31
And that's a much bigger project;
373
1146000
2000
19:33
it's going to take 20 years or so to come to fruition.
374
1148000
4000
19:37
But part of that is to fulfill our mission
375
1152000
2000
19:39
of giving an encyclopedia to every single person on the planet.
376
1154000
3000
19:42
We don't mean we're going to spam them with AOL-style CDs.
377
1157000
3000
19:45
We mean we're going to give them a tool that they can use.
378
1160000
3000
19:48
And for a lot of people in the world,
379
1163000
2000
19:50
if I give you an encyclopedia that's written at a university level,
380
1165000
2000
19:52
it doesn't do you any good
381
1167000
2000
19:54
without a whole host of literacy materials
382
1169000
2000
19:56
to build you up to the point where you can actually use it.
383
1171000
2000
19:58
And so the Wiki books project is an effort to do that.
384
1173000
3000
20:01
And I think that we're going to really see a huge --
385
1176000
2000
20:03
it may not even come from us;
386
1178000
1000
20:04
there's all kinds of innovation going on.
387
1179000
2000
20:06
But freely licensed textbooks are the next big thing in education.
388
1181000
4000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Jimmy Wales - Founder of WikipediaWith a vision for a free online encyclopedia, Wales assembled legions of volunteer contributors, gave them tools for collaborating, and created the self-organizing, self-correcting, ever-expanding, multilingual encyclopedia of the future.
Why you should listen
Jimmy Wales went from betting on interest rates and foreign-currency fluctuations (as an option trader) to betting on the willingness of people to share their knowledge. That's how Wikipedia, imagined in 2001, became one of the most-referenced, most-used repositories of knowledge on the planet, with more than four and a half million articles in English (compared with the Britannica's 80,000) and millions in dozens of other languages, all freely available.
The "wiki" in the name refers to software that allows anyone with Internet access to add, delete or edit entries. This has led to controversies about the reliability of the information, prompting the Wikimedia Foundation to set tighter rules for editors, while still keeping Wikipedia open-source. One thing is certain: Wikipedia will never be finished. In the meantime Wales has started working on Wikiasari, a wiki-style search engine.
Jimmy Wales | Speaker | TED.com