TEDSalon NY2011
Shlomo Benartzi: Saving for tomorrow, tomorrow
施羅莫·本納茨：為明天而節約
Filmed:
Readability: 3.2
1,754,678 views
想像從下星期開始存錢很容易，但是為甚麼不是現在呢？一般來說，我們想要花錢。經濟學家本納茨說這是我們存退休金的最大障礙。他提出一個問題：我們怎樣把行為性挑戰變成行為性的解決方案呢？
Shlomo Benartzi - Economist
Shlomo Benartzi uses behavioral economics to study how and why we plan well for the future (or fail to), and uses that to develop new programs to encourage saving for retirement. Full bio
Shlomo Benartzi uses behavioral economics to study how and why we plan well for the future (or fail to), and uses that to develop new programs to encourage saving for retirement. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:15
I'm going to talk today about saving more,
0
0
3000
我今天想聊聊存錢
00:18
but not today, tomorrow.
1
3000
3000
但不是今天，是明天
00:21
I'm going to talk about Save More Tomorrow.
2
6000
2000
我將要聊聊為明天儲存更多錢
00:23
It's a program that Richard Thaler
3
8000
2000
有一個計劃
00:25
from the University of Chicago and I
4
10000
2000
是來自芝加哥大學理查德泰勒和我一起
00:27
devised maybe 15 years ago.
5
12000
3000
大概15年前設計的
00:30
The program, in a sense,
6
15000
2000
這個計劃，從某種程度來說，
00:32
is an example of behavioral finance
7
17000
2000
是行為經濟學的一個例子
00:34
on steroids --
8
19000
2000
也就是－
00:36
how we could really use behavioral finance.
9
21000
3000
我們如何真正利用行為經濟學
00:39
Now you might ask, what is behavioral finance?
10
24000
3000
於是你會問，甚麼是行為經濟學？
00:42
So let's think about how we manage our money.
11
27000
3000
讓我們來思考我們平時是怎樣理財的
00:45
Let's start with mortgages.
12
30000
3000
我們從房貸說起
00:48
It's kind of a recent topic,
13
33000
2000
最近我們常看到這個話題
00:50
at least in the U.S.
14
35000
2000
至少在美國是如此
00:52
A lot of people buy
15
37000
2000
很多人買
00:54
the biggest house they can afford,
16
39000
3000
在他們支付能力範圍之內最大的房子
00:57
and actually slightly bigger than that.
17
42000
3000
事實上比可支付範圍還要稍大一些
01:00
And then they foreclose.
18
45000
3000
最後他們付不起房貸
01:03
And then they blame the banks
19
48000
2000
於是他們開始埋怨銀行
01:05
for being the bad guys who gave them the mortgages.
20
50000
3000
說銀行是貸款給他們的壞人
01:08
Let's also think about
21
53000
2000
我們再想想
01:10
how we manage risks --
22
55000
2000
我們怎樣管理風險－
01:12
for example, investing in the stock market.
23
57000
2000
舉個例子，投資股票市場
01:14
Two years ago, three years ago, about four years ago,
24
59000
3000
兩年前，三年前，大約四年前
01:17
markets did well.
25
62000
2000
市場運行得很好
01:19
We were risk takers, of course.
26
64000
3000
當然那時候我們都是投機者
01:22
Then market stocks seize
27
67000
2000
接著股票市場蕭條衰敗
01:24
and we're like, "Wow.
28
69000
2000
我們會想，“噢
01:26
These losses, they feel, emotionally,
29
71000
3000
這些損失，在情感上
01:29
they feel very different
30
74000
3000
他們確實感覺很不同
01:32
from what we actually thought about it
31
77000
3000
和股市行情上漲時
01:35
when markets were going up."
32
80000
2000
我們對損失的感覺不一樣”
01:37
So we're probably not doing a great job
33
82000
3000
所以在風險投機上
01:40
when it comes to risk taking.
34
85000
2000
我們似乎也做的不太好
01:42
How many of you have iPhones?
35
87000
3000
你們有多少人用iPhone？
01:45
Anyone? Wonderful.
36
90000
3000
有人麼？非常好
01:48
I would bet many more of you
37
93000
3000
我打賭這裡擁有iPhone的人中的大多數
01:51
insure your iPhone --
38
96000
3000
都給你的iPhone買保險了
01:54
you're implicitly buying insurance by having an extended warranty.
39
99000
3000
你通過加買的質保暗中給手機買了保險
01:57
What if you lose your iPhone?
40
102000
2000
如果你丟失了你的iPhone
01:59
What if you do this?
41
104000
2000
你會怎麼辦呢？
02:01
How many of you have kids?
42
106000
2000
你們中多少人有小孩？
02:03
Anyone?
43
108000
2000
有人有嗎？
02:05
Keep your hands up
44
110000
2000
手再擧著不要放
02:07
if you have sufficient life insurance.
45
112000
3000
如果你有購買生命保險的話
02:10
I see a lot of hands coming down.
46
115000
2000
我看到很多手放下去了
02:12
I would predict,
47
117000
2000
我會預測
02:14
if you're a representative sample,
48
119000
2000
如果你是一個典型的代表
02:16
that many more of you
49
121000
2000
你們中的很多人
02:18
insure your iPhones than your lives,
50
123000
3000
為你的iPhone買了保險卻沒有為你的生命買保險
02:21
even when you have kids.
51
126000
2000
即便你已經有了小孩
02:23
We're not doing that well when it comes to insurance.
52
128000
3000
在買保險的方面我們做得也不是很好
02:26
The average American household
53
131000
4000
美國家庭平均每戶
02:30
spends 1,000 dollars a year
54
135000
3000
一年要在樂透上
02:33
on lotteries.
55
138000
2000
花費1,000美元
02:35
And I know it sounds crazy.
56
140000
3000
我知道這聽起來很瘋狂
02:38
How many of you spend a thousand dollars a year on lotteries?
57
143000
3000
你們中有多少人一年會花1,000美金買樂透？
02:41
No one.
58
146000
2000
沒有人
02:43
So that tells us that the people not in this room
59
148000
3000
那麽這告訴我們有些不在這個房間裡的人
02:46
are spending more than a thousand
60
151000
2000
買樂透超過了一千美金
02:48
to get the average to a thousand.
61
153000
3000
所以最終平均才會等於一千美金
02:51
Low-income people
62
156000
2000
特別是有些低收入戶
02:53
spend a lot more than a thousand on lotteries.
63
158000
4000
一年在樂透上花費了超過一千美金
02:57
So where does it take us?
64
162000
2000
於是這告訴我們甚麼？
02:59
We're not doing a great job managing money.
65
164000
3000
我們在理財上做得也不是很好
03:02
Behavioral finance is really a combination
66
167000
3000
行為經濟學實際上
03:05
of psychology and economics,
67
170000
2000
是心理學和經濟學的一個綜合
03:07
trying to understand
68
172000
2000
讓我們瞭解
03:09
the money mistakes people make.
69
174000
2000
為甚麼人們在金錢問題上會犯錯
03:11
And I can keep standing here
70
176000
2000
我可以站在這裡
03:13
for the 12 minutes and 53 seconds that I have left
71
178000
4000
用我剩下的12分鐘53秒
03:17
and make fun of all sorts of ways
72
182000
2000
把我們理財用的各種方法
03:19
we manage money,
73
184000
2000
當作笑話講給各位聼
03:21
and at the end you're going to ask, "How can we help people?"
74
186000
3000
到最後你會問，“我們怎樣幫助人們？”
03:24
And that's what I really want to focus on today.
75
189000
3000
所以我今天真正想關注的是
03:27
How do we take an understanding
76
192000
2000
我們如何理解
03:29
of the money mistakes people make,
77
194000
3000
人們在金錢問題上犯的錯誤
03:32
and then turning the behavioral challenges
78
197000
3000
以及怎樣把行為性挑戰
03:35
into behavioral solutions?
79
200000
2000
轉化為行為性的解決方案？
03:37
And what I'm going to talk about today
80
202000
2000
我今天要談的
03:39
is Save More Tomorrow.
81
204000
2000
是為明天節省更多
03:41
I want to address the issue
82
206000
2000
我要討論的
03:43
of savings.
83
208000
2000
是存錢這個問題
03:45
We have on the screen
84
210000
2000
在屏幕上
03:47
a representative sample
85
212000
2000
有具有代表性的
03:49
of 100 Americans.
86
214000
2000
100個美國人
03:51
And we're going to look at their saving behavior.
87
216000
3000
我們來看看他們的儲蓄習慣
03:54
First thing to notice is,
88
219000
2000
第一件需要注意的事情是
03:56
half of them
89
221000
2000
他們中一半的人
03:58
do not even have access
90
223000
2000
都沒有參加
04:00
to a 401(k) plan.
91
225000
2000
401(k)退休福利計劃
04:02
They cannot make savings easy.
92
227000
3000
存錢對他們來説很不容易
04:05
They cannot have money go away from their paycheck
93
230000
3000
他們不能把錢從他們的支票
04:08
into a 401(k) plan
94
233000
2000
押到進入401(k)計劃裏
04:10
before they see it,
95
235000
2000
他們一看到錢就花
04:12
before they can touch it.
96
237000
2000
一摸到錢就花
04:14
What about the remaining half of the people?
97
239000
3000
那麼剩下的一半人呢？
04:17
Some of them elect not to save.
98
242000
3000
一些人傾向於不存款
04:20
They're just too lazy.
99
245000
2000
他們只是太懶了
04:22
They never get around to logging into a complicated website
100
247000
3000
他們從沒有登入過一個複雜一點的網站
04:25
and doing 17 clicks to join the 401(k) plan.
101
250000
3000
點擊17下加入401(k)計劃
04:28
And then they have to decide how they're going to invest
102
253000
2000
當他們決定他們要去投資的時候
04:30
in their 52 choices,
103
255000
2000
在他們的52個選擇裡
04:32
and they never heard about what is a money market fund.
104
257000
4000
他們從未聽說過基金
04:36
And they get overwhelmed and the just don't join.
105
261000
2000
他們覺得太複雜了於是就沒加入
04:38
How many people end up saving to a 401(k) plan?
106
263000
5000
最終有多少人向該計劃存款？
04:43
One third of Americans.
107
268000
3000
只有三分之一的美國人
04:46
Two thirds are not saving now.
108
271000
2000
三分之二都不存款
04:48
Are they saving enough?
109
273000
2000
他們存得夠多嗎？
04:50
Take out those
110
275000
2000
除去那些
04:52
who say they save too little.
111
277000
2000
說自己存的太少的人
04:54
One out of 10
112
279000
2000
十分之一的人
04:56
are saving enough.
113
281000
3000
覺得自己存款夠了
04:59
Nine out of 10
114
284000
2000
十分之九
05:01
either cannot save through their 401(k) plan,
115
286000
3000
有的不能徹底執行401(k)計劃存到退休金
05:04
decide not to save -- or don't decide --
116
289000
3000
所以決定不存或是下不了決定
05:07
or save too little.
117
292000
3000
有的則是存得太少
05:10
We think we have a problem
118
295000
2000
對於那些存款太多的人
05:12
of people saving too much.
119
297000
2000
我們覺得也有一些問題
05:14
Let's look at that.
120
299000
2000
我們來看這裡
05:16
We have one person --
121
301000
2000
有一個人－
05:18
well, actually we're going to slice him in half
122
303000
3000
其實我們要把他切成一半
05:21
because it's less than one percent.
123
306000
3000
因為小於百分之一
05:24
Roughly half a percent of Americans
124
309000
3000
差不多只有百分之零點五的美國人
05:27
feel that they save too much.
125
312000
5000
認為他們存得夠多了
05:32
What are we going to do about it?
126
317000
2000
我們對此能做甚麼呢？
05:34
That's what I really want to focus on.
127
319000
2000
以下就是我真正想要關注的
05:36
We have to understand
128
321000
2000
我們必須先明白
05:38
why people are not saving,
129
323000
2000
為甚麼人們不去存款
05:40
and then we can hopefully flip
130
325000
2000
接著我們才能
05:42
the behavioral challenges
131
327000
2000
把行為性挑戰
05:44
into behavioral solutions,
132
329000
2000
轉化為行為性解決方案
05:46
and then see how powerful it might be.
133
331000
3000
並看看這會有多大效果
05:49
So let me divert for a second
134
334000
2000
所以接下來讓我稍微轉移一下話題
05:51
as we're going to identify the problems,
135
336000
2000
因爲我們必須要認清問題
05:53
the challenges, the behavioral challenges,
136
338000
3000
我們面對的挑戰，行為性挑戰
05:56
that prevent people from saving.
137
341000
2000
去找出阻止人們存錢的原因
05:58
I'm going to divert and talk about bananas and chocolate.
138
343000
4000
我要轉移到下一個話題，來談談香蕉和巧克力
06:02
Suppose we had another wonderful TED event next week.
139
347000
3000
假設下一周我們有另一場非常棒的TED活動
06:05
And during the break
140
350000
2000
休息期間
06:07
there would be a snack
141
352000
2000
將會有零食供應
06:09
and you could choose bananas or chocolate.
142
354000
2000
你可以選擇香蕉或是巧克力
06:11
How many of you think you would like to have bananas
143
356000
3000
你們中有多少人覺得你會在
06:14
during this hypothetical TED event next week?
144
359000
2000
下週假想的晚會中選擇香蕉？
06:16
Who would go for bananas?
145
361000
2000
誰會選擇香蕉？
06:18
Wonderful.
146
363000
2000
不錯
06:20
I predict scientifically
147
365000
2000
我科學地預測一下
06:22
74 percent of you will go for bananas.
148
367000
3000
百分之七十四的人會選擇香蕉
06:25
Well that's at least what one wonderful study predicted.
149
370000
4000
這至少是一個權威的科學研究預測的
06:30
And then count down the days
150
375000
3000
接著我們倒數日子
06:33
and see what people ended up eating.
151
378000
4000
最後來看看人們最後到底吃了些甚麼
06:38
The same people that imagined themselves
152
383000
3000
一個禮拜之後
06:41
eating the bananas
153
386000
2000
那些認為
06:43
ended up eating chocolates
154
388000
2000
他們會吃香蕉的人
06:45
a week later.
155
390000
2000
最終都選擇了巧克力
06:47
Self-control
156
392000
2000
自制力
06:49
is not a problem in the future.
157
394000
3000
在未來來説並不是一個問題
06:52
It's only a problem now
158
397000
2000
當巧克力離我們很近的時候
06:54
when the chocolate is next to us.
159
399000
4000
自制力就會有問題了
06:58
What does it have to do with time and savings,
160
403000
3000
這種瞬間的喜悅
07:01
this issue of immediate gratification?
161
406000
3000
和我們時間以及儲蓄有甚麼關聯？
07:04
Or as some economists call it, present bias.
162
409000
4000
或者就像一些經濟學家所講的，現在狀態的偏見
07:08
We think about saving. We know we should be saving.
163
413000
2000
我們想著如何儲蓄，我們知道我們應該存錢
07:10
We know we'll do it next year, but today let us go and spend.
164
415000
3000
我們知道明年我們會做，但是今天就讓我們花錢吧
07:13
Christmas is coming,
165
418000
2000
聖誕節要來了
07:15
we might as well buy a lot of gifts for everyone we know.
166
420000
3000
我們最好給我們認識的人買很多禮物
07:18
So this issue of present bias
167
423000
4000
所以“現在狀態的偏見”
07:22
causes us to think about saving,
168
427000
2000
導致我們考慮儲蓄
07:24
but end up spending.
169
429000
2000
最後卻把錢花掉了
07:26
Let me now talk
170
431000
2000
讓我現在來講
07:28
about another behavioral obstacle to saving
171
433000
2000
另一個關於儲蓄的行為性障礙
07:30
having to do with inertia.
172
435000
2000
這和慣性有關
07:32
But again, a little diversion
173
437000
2000
再一次，小小地轉移話題
07:34
to the topic of organ donation.
174
439000
3000
到器官捐獻上
07:37
Wonderful study comparing different countries.
175
442000
3000
有一份很完美的研究比較了不同國家之間的情況
07:40
We're going to look at two similar countries,
176
445000
3000
我們來看兩個相似的國家
07:43
Germany and Austria.
177
448000
3000
德國和奧地利
07:46
And in Germany,
178
451000
2000
在德國
07:48
if you would like to donate your organs --
179
453000
2000
如果你想要捐贈你的器官－
07:50
God forbid something really bad
180
455000
2000
上帝會禁止一些非常壞的事情
07:52
happens to you --
181
457000
2000
發生在你的身上
07:54
when you get your driving license or an I.D.,
182
459000
3000
當你拿到你的駕照或是一個ID卡
07:57
you check the box saying,
183
462000
2000
勾選一個小方格
07:59
"I would like to donate my organs."
184
464000
2000
“我願意捐贈我的器官”
08:01
Not many people like checking boxes.
185
466000
2000
不太多人願意勾選小方格
08:03
It takes effort. You need to think.
186
468000
2000
這要花費力氣，你需要想
08:05
Twelve percent do.
187
470000
3000
百分之十二的人會去勾選
08:08
Austria, a neighboring country,
188
473000
3000
在鄰國奧地利
08:11
slightly similar, slightly different.
189
476000
2000
有點相同而又有點不同
08:13
What's the difference?
190
478000
2000
有甚麼不同？
08:15
Well, you still have choice.
191
480000
2000
嗯，你還是可以選擇的
08:17
You will decide
192
482000
2000
你會選
08:19
whether you want to donate your organs or not.
193
484000
3000
是否希望捐贈器官
08:22
But when you get your driving license,
194
487000
2000
但當你得到你的駕照
08:24
you check the box
195
489000
2000
你要勾選一個方格
08:26
if you do not want to donate your organ.
196
491000
4000
“如果你不想要捐贈你的器官”
08:30
Nobody checks boxes.
197
495000
2000
基本上沒有人勾這項
08:32
That's kind of too much effort.
198
497000
2000
這太費力氣了
08:34
One percent check the box. The rest do nothing.
199
499000
3000
只有百分之一的人勾選，剩下的人甚麼都沒做
08:37
Doing nothing is very common.
200
502000
2000
放著不做是通常會發生的行為
08:39
Not many people check boxes.
201
504000
3000
沒幾個人勾選方格
08:42
What are the implications
202
507000
2000
拯救生命
08:44
to saving lives
203
509000
2000
和捐贈器官之間
08:46
and having organs available?
204
511000
3000
有什麽關聯？
08:49
In Germany, 12 percent check the box.
205
514000
2000
在德國，百分之十二的人勾選這個格子
08:51
Twelve percent are organ donors.
206
516000
3000
於是只有百分之十二的人成為器官捐贈者
08:54
Huge shortage of organs,
207
519000
2000
導致了巨大的器官短缺
08:56
God forbid, if you need one.
208
521000
2000
當你需要時上帝會禁止
08:58
In Austria, again, nobody checks the box.
209
523000
3000
在奧地利，沒有人勾選這個方格
09:01
Therefore, 99 percent of people
210
526000
3000
於是，百分之九十九的人
09:04
are organ donors.
211
529000
2000
都是器官捐贈者
09:06
Inertia, lack of action.
212
531000
2000
慣性，缺乏行動
09:08
What is the default setting
213
533000
2000
原始狀態會是什麽
09:10
if people do nothing,
214
535000
2000
如果人們甚麼都不做？
09:12
if they keep procrastinating, if they don't check the boxes?
215
537000
3000
如果他們一直拖延，如果他們不勾選方格？
09:15
Very powerful.
216
540000
2000
這是非常有效的
09:17
We're going to talk
217
542000
2000
我們即將講到
09:19
about what happens if people are overwhelmed and scared
218
544000
4000
如果人們覺得難以應付或害怕
09:23
to make their 401(k) choices.
219
548000
3000
去加入401(k)計劃
09:26
Are we going to make them automatically join the plan,
220
551000
3000
我們是讓他們自動加入計劃
09:29
or are they going to be left out?
221
554000
2000
還是就放任不管？
09:31
In too many 401(k) plans,
222
556000
3000
在太多的計劃之中
09:34
if people do nothing,
223
559000
2000
如果人們甚麼都不做
09:36
it means they're not saving for retirement,
224
561000
3000
如果他們不勾選方格
09:39
if they don't check the box.
225
564000
2000
意味著他們並沒有在儲存退休金
09:41
And checking the box takes effort.
226
566000
3000
當然勾選方格需要付出努力
09:44
So we've chatted about a couple of behavioral challenges.
227
569000
3000
以上我們談了幾項行為性挑戰
09:47
One more before we flip the challenges into solutions,
228
572000
3000
在談解決方案之前我們還要再講一個例子
09:50
having to do with monkeys and apples.
229
575000
2000
是關於猴子和蘋果的例子
09:52
No, no, no, this is a real study
230
577000
2000
不不不，這是一個真實的研究
09:54
and it's got a lot to do with behavioral economics.
231
579000
4000
這和行為經濟學有很大關係
09:58
One group of monkeys gets an apple, they're pretty happy.
232
583000
3000
一群猴子得到一個蘋果，他們很開心
10:01
The other group gets two apples, one is taken away.
233
586000
2000
另外一群猴子得到兩個蘋果，其中一個被拿走了
10:03
They still have an apple left.
234
588000
2000
他們仍然有一個蘋果
10:05
They're really mad.
235
590000
3000
不過他們非常生氣
10:08
Why have you taken our apple?
236
593000
3000
“你為甚麼拿走我們的蘋果？”
10:11
This is the notion of loss aversion.
237
596000
3000
這就叫做對於失去的厭惡感
10:14
We hate losing stuff,
238
599000
2000
我們憎恨失去東西
10:16
even if it doesn't mean a lot of risk.
239
601000
3000
即使這並不意味著很高風險
10:19
You would hate to go to the ATM,
240
604000
3000
你不會喜歡去自動提款機提款時
10:22
take out 100 dollars
241
607000
2000
提出100美金以後
10:24
and notice that you lost one of those $20 bills.
242
609000
2000
發現你丟失了其中一張20元的鈔票
10:26
It's very painful,
243
611000
2000
即使這沒什麽大不了
10:28
even though it doesn't mean anything.
244
613000
2000
但這卻很令人痛苦
10:30
Those 20 dollars might have been a quick lunch.
245
615000
4000
用這20美金本來可以吃一頓午餐
10:34
So this notion of loss aversion
246
619000
4000
所以關於失去厭惡感的想法
10:38
kicks in when it comes to savings too,
247
623000
3000
同樣也會發生在儲蓄上
10:41
because people, mentally
248
626000
2000
因為人，在精神上
10:43
and emotionally and intuitively
249
628000
3000
和情緒上直覺地認為
10:46
frame savings as a loss
250
631000
2000
存錢儲蓄是一種失去
10:48
because I have to cut my spending.
251
633000
3000
因為爲了存錢我必須減少我的支出
10:51
So we talked about
252
636000
2000
所以當我們講到
10:53
all sorts of behavioral challenges
253
638000
2000
各式各樣的行為性挑戰
10:55
having to do with savings eventually.
254
640000
4000
最終都和儲蓄有關
10:59
Whether you think about immediate gratification,
255
644000
3000
不管你是想到瞬間的滿足
11:02
and the chocolates versus bananas,
256
647000
3000
巧克力對香蕉
11:05
it's just painful to save now.
257
650000
3000
現在就去存錢是很痛苦的
11:08
It's a lot more fun
258
653000
2000
相比之下
11:10
to spend now.
259
655000
2000
即刻花錢是更快樂的
11:12
We talked about inertia and organ donations
260
657000
3000
我們談到慣性和器官捐贈
11:15
and checking the box.
261
660000
2000
還有勾選方格
11:17
If people have to check a lot of boxes
262
662000
2000
如果人麼需要勾選很多的方格
11:19
to join a 401(k) plan,
263
664000
2000
來加入401(k)計劃
11:21
they're going to keep procrastinating
264
666000
2000
他們將會一直拖延下去
11:23
and not join.
265
668000
2000
最終不參加
11:25
And last, we talked about loss aversion,
266
670000
2000
最後，我們談到了對於失去的厭惡感
11:27
and the monkeys and the apples.
267
672000
2000
猴子和蘋果的故事
11:29
If people frame mentally
268
674000
3000
如果一個人心中認為
11:32
saving for retirement as a loss,
269
677000
3000
對於退休金的儲存是一種失去
11:35
they're not going to be saving for retirement.
270
680000
3000
他們將不會去做
11:38
So we've got these challenges,
271
683000
2000
所以這些是我們眼前的挑戰
11:40
and what Richard Thaler and I
272
685000
2000
理查泰勒和我
11:42
were always fascinated by --
273
687000
2000
都一直為一件事著迷－
11:44
take behavioral finance,
274
689000
2000
將傳統的行為經濟學
11:46
make it behavioral finance on steroids
275
691000
2000
升級成為行為經濟學加強版
11:48
or behavioral finance 2.0
276
693000
2000
行為經濟學2.0
11:50
or behavioral finance in action --
277
695000
2000
或者行動行為經濟學－
11:52
flip the challenges into solutions.
278
697000
4000
把挑戰轉化為解決方案
11:56
And we came up with an embarrassingly simple solution
279
701000
3000
最後我們得出了一個非常簡單的解決方案
11:59
called Save More, not today, Tomorrow.
280
704000
4000
叫做存得更多，不是今天，是明天
12:03
How is it going to solve the challenges
281
708000
2000
那麽我們認為
12:05
we chatted about?
282
710000
2000
應該如何解決這個挑戰？
12:07
If you think about the problem
283
712000
2000
如果你想到
12:09
of bananas versus chocolates,
284
714000
2000
香蕉和巧克力的問題
12:11
we think we're going to eat bananas next week.
285
716000
3000
我們想我們下一周要吃香蕉
12:14
We think we're going to save more next year.
286
719000
3000
我們想明年我們要存更多
12:17
Save More Tomorrow
287
722000
3000
明天再存更多
12:20
invites employees
288
725000
2000
邀請職員
12:22
to save more maybe next year --
289
727000
2000
明年存更多－
12:24
sometime in the future
290
729000
2000
在未來的某個時候
12:26
when we can imagine ourselves
291
731000
2000
當我們能想像到我們自己
12:28
eating bananas,
292
733000
2000
吃香蕉
12:30
volunteering more in the community,
293
735000
2000
在社區裡做更多的志願者工作
12:32
exercising more and doing all the right things on the planet.
294
737000
4000
作更多的練習和在這個星球上做對的事情
12:36
Now we also talked about checking the box
295
741000
3000
現在我們也談論了勾選方格
12:39
and the difficulty of taking action.
296
744000
3000
和採取行動的困難性
12:42
Save More Tomorrow
297
747000
2000
明天存更多
12:44
makes it easy.
298
749000
2000
讓選擇變得容易
12:46
It's an autopilot.
299
751000
2000
一切變成全自動
12:48
Once you tell me you would like to save more in the future,
300
753000
4000
一旦你告訴我你未來想要存得更多
12:52
let's say every January
301
757000
2000
譬如說每年一月
12:54
you're going to be saving more automatically
302
759000
3000
你都要自動存更多
12:57
and it's going to go away from your paycheck to the 401(k) plan
303
762000
3000
那麽將會直接從薪水匯到到你的401(k)計劃裏
13:00
before you see it, before you touch it,
304
765000
2000
在你看到錢之前，在你能碰到錢之前
13:02
before you get the issue
305
767000
2000
在你感到短暫的滿足感之前
13:04
of immediate gratification.
306
769000
3000
問題已經被處理掉了
13:07
But what are we going to do about the monkeys
307
772000
3000
但是對於猴子和厭惡失去的問題
13:10
and loss aversion?
308
775000
2000
我們該怎麽處理呢？
13:12
Next January comes
309
777000
2000
下一個一月到來了
13:14
and people might feel that if they save more,
310
779000
2000
人們感覺如果他們存得更多
13:16
they have to spend less, and that's painful.
311
781000
3000
他們花費將變得更少，於是他們將感到痛苦
13:20
Well, maybe it shouldn't be just January.
312
785000
2000
好吧，或許應該說不限於一月份
13:22
Maybe we should make people save more
313
787000
3000
或許我們要在人們賺更多錢的時候
13:25
when they make more money.
314
790000
3000
來存得更多
13:28
That way, when they make more money, when they get a pay raise,
315
793000
3000
這樣一來，當他們賺得更多，酬金升高時
13:31
they don't have to cut their spending.
316
796000
4000
他們將不會覺得支出被削減了
13:35
They take a little bit
317
800000
2000
從他們多賺的錢裏面
13:37
of the increase in the paycheck home
318
802000
2000
拿一部分回家
13:39
and spend more --
319
804000
2000
來使花費得更多－
13:41
take a little bit of the increase
320
806000
2000
再把多賺得錢的另一部份
13:43
and put it in a 401(k) plan.
321
808000
2000
投入401(k)計劃中
13:45
So that is the program,
322
810000
2000
所以這個計劃
13:47
embarrassingly simple,
323
812000
2000
非常得簡單
13:49
but as we're going to see,
324
814000
2000
但我們將要看到的
13:51
extremely powerful.
325
816000
2000
是非常非常有利的結果
13:53
We first implemented it,
326
818000
2000
在1998年
13:55
Richard Thaler and I,
327
820000
2000
理查德和我
13:57
back in 1998.
328
822000
3000
第一次讓計劃生效
14:00
Mid-sized company in the Midwest,
329
825000
3000
在中西部得一些中小型企業
14:03
blue collar employees
330
828000
2000
那些為支付賬單
14:05
struggling to pay their bills
331
830000
2000
搞得焦頭爛額的藍領員工們
14:07
repeatedly told us
332
832000
2000
不斷告訴我們
14:09
they cannot save more right away.
333
834000
3000
他們無法存得更多
14:12
Saving more today is not an option.
334
837000
3000
今日存更多並不是一個選擇
14:15
We invited them to save
335
840000
2000
我們邀請他們
14:17
three percentage points more
336
842000
3000
在每次薪水調高的時候
14:20
every time they get a pay raise.
337
845000
3000
加把存進百分之三以上
14:23
And here are the results.
338
848000
3000
結果就在這裡
14:26
We're seeing here a three and a half-year period,
339
851000
2000
我們看到三年半的實踐中
14:28
four pay raises,
340
853000
2000
四次的調薪
14:30
people who were struggling to save,
341
855000
2000
那些過去無法存款的人們
14:32
were saving three percent of their paycheck,
342
857000
2000
存了他們酬金中的百分之三
14:34
three and a half years later
343
859000
2000
三年半之後
14:36
saving almost four times as much,
344
861000
3000
竟然存了4倍之多
14:39
almost 14 percent.
345
864000
3000
幾乎達到百分之十四
14:42
And there's shoes and bicycles
346
867000
2000
這是鞋子和單車
14:44
and things on this chart
347
869000
2000
和表格上的東西
14:46
because I don't want to just throw numbers
348
871000
2000
因為我不想直接
14:48
in a vacuum.
349
873000
2000
憑空說數字
14:50
I want, really, to think about the fact
350
875000
3000
說真正，大家來想想這個結果
14:53
that saving four times more
351
878000
2000
存到四倍之多的存款
14:55
is a huge difference
352
880000
2000
這是生活方式中的
14:57
in terms of the lifestyle
353
882000
2000
一個巨大差別
14:59
that people will be able to afford.
354
884000
2000
人們將有能力償還了
15:01
It's real.
355
886000
2000
這是真實的
15:03
It's not just numbers on a piece of paper.
356
888000
3000
這不僅僅是一張白紙上的數字
15:06
Whereas with saving three percent,
357
891000
2000
當存百分之三時
15:08
people might have to add nice sneakers
358
893000
2000
人們可能因此有了一雙很好的運動鞋
15:10
so they can walk,
359
895000
2000
只能走路
15:12
because they won't be able to afford anything else,
360
897000
4000
因為他們買不起其他東西
15:16
when they save 14 percent
361
901000
2000
而當他們存了百分之十四之後
15:18
they might be able to maybe have nice dress shoes
362
903000
3000
他們或許可以有能力支付很好的裙子或是鞋子
15:21
to walk to the car to drive.
363
906000
3000
能夠走到車裡開車
15:24
This is a real difference.
364
909000
2000
這是一個巨大的不同
15:26
By now, about 60 percent of the large companies
365
911000
5000
直到如今，大約百分之60的大企業
15:31
actually have programs like this in place.
366
916000
3000
都有在落實類似的項目
15:34
It's been part of the Pension Protection Act.
367
919000
3000
這已經成為了退休金保護計劃中的一部分
15:37
And needless to say that Thaler and I
368
922000
2000
而泰勒和我
15:39
have been blessed to be part of this program
369
924000
3000
已經成為這個項目的一分子
15:42
and make a difference.
370
927000
2000
來創造不同
15:44
Let me wrap
371
929000
2000
讓我們來最後
15:46
with two key messages.
372
931000
3000
用兩個非常重要的信息來作結論
15:49
One is behavioral finance
373
934000
3000
一個是行為經濟學
15:52
is extremely powerful.
374
937000
3000
是很有用的
15:55
This is just one example.
375
940000
3000
這只是一個例子
15:58
Message two
376
943000
2000
第二條信息是
16:00
is there's still a lot to do.
377
945000
2000
還有很多需要去落實
16:02
This is really the tip of the iceberg.
378
947000
3000
這真的只是冰山一角
16:05
If you think about people and mortgages
379
950000
3000
如果你想到人們和房貸
16:08
and buying houses and then not being able to pay for it,
380
953000
3000
還有買了房子卻無力償還貸款
16:11
we need to think about that.
381
956000
2000
我們應該想想這個項目
16:13
If you're thinking about people taking too much risk
382
958000
3000
如果你想到人們採取太多冒險行為
16:16
and not understanding how much risk they're taking
383
961000
3000
卻不了解他們在冒多大的風險
16:19
or taking too little risk,
384
964000
2000
或是多小的風險
16:21
we need to think about that.
385
966000
2000
我們應該想想這個項目
16:23
If you think about people spending a thousand dollars a year
386
968000
3000
如果你想到人們每年花費一千美金
16:26
on lottery tickets,
387
971000
2000
去買樂透券
16:28
we need to think about that.
388
973000
2000
我們應該想到這個項目
16:30
The average actually,
389
975000
2000
在新加坡
16:32
the record is in Singapore.
390
977000
2000
實際記錄中
16:34
The average household
391
979000
2000
平均每戶
16:36
spends $4,000 a year on lottery tickets.
392
981000
3000
每年會花費4000美金購買樂透
16:39
We've got a lot to do,
393
984000
2000
我們該做的還很多
16:41
a lot to solve,
394
986000
2000
很多需要解決的
16:43
also in the retirement area
395
988000
3000
還有在退休金領域裏
16:46
when it comes to what people do with their money
396
991000
2000
這涉及到人們在退休後
16:48
after retirement.
397
993000
2000
怎樣理財
16:50
One last question:
398
995000
2000
最後一個問題：
16:52
How many of you feel comfortable
399
997000
3000
你們中有多少人
16:55
that as you're planning for retirement
400
1000000
2000
覺得你們在計劃退休之後的事情
16:57
you have a really solid plan
401
1002000
3000
覺得你自己在退休之後
17:00
when you're going to retire,
402
1005000
2000
有一個很實際的理財計劃？
17:02
when you're going to claim Social Security benefits,
403
1007000
3000
當你要領取社保福利的時候
17:05
what lifestyle to expect,
404
1010000
2000
你期待著那一種生活方式
17:07
how much to spend every month
405
1012000
2000
一個月將要支付多少元
17:09
so you're not going to run out of money?
406
1014000
2000
最終你將不會透支？
17:11
How many of you feel you have a solid plan for the future
407
1016000
3000
有多少人認為自己在未來的後退休計劃中
17:14
when it comes to post-retirement decisions.
408
1019000
4000
有一個很務實的計劃？
17:19
One, two, three, four.
409
1024000
3000
一，二，三，四
17:22
Less than three percent
410
1027000
2000
只有小於百分之三的人會這麽做
17:24
of a very sophisticated audience.
411
1029000
2000
雖然在座的都是聰明人
17:26
Behavioral finance has a long way.
412
1031000
3000
行為經濟學是一條長路
17:29
There's a lot of opportunities
413
1034000
2000
有很多的機會
17:31
to make it powerful again and again and again.
414
1036000
4000
能讓它變得一次一次再一次的有用
17:35
Thank you.
415
1040000
2000
謝謝
17:37
(Applause)
416
1042000
2000
（掌聲）
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Shlomo Benartzi - EconomistShlomo Benartzi uses behavioral economics to study how and why we plan well for the future (or fail to), and uses that to develop new programs to encourage saving for retirement.
Why you should listen
Shlomo Benartzi studies behavioral finance with a special interest in personal finance. He is co-founder of the Behavioral Finance Forum (www.behavioralfinanceforum.com), a collective of 40 prominent academics and 40 major financial institutions from around the globe. The Forum helps consumers make better financial decisions by fostering collaborative research efforts between academics and industry leaders.
Benartzi’s most significant research contribution is the development of Save More Tomorrow™ (SMarT), a behavioral prescription designed to help employees increase their savings rates gradually over time.
Shlomo Benartzi | Speaker | TED.com