TEDGlobal 2009
David Deutsch: A new way to explain explanation
大衛‧德意志：人類解釋世界之全新觀點
Filmed:
Readability: 5
1,268,796 views
數千年來，我們人類的祖先通過神話，並以很緩慢的速度理解這個世界。隨著科學解釋的興起，世界在短短幾個世紀以內改變了很多。這是爲什麽呢？物理學家大衛‧德意志會給我們一個絕妙的答案。
David Deutsch - Quantum physicist
David Deutsch's 1997 book "The Fabric of Reality" laid the groundwork for an all-encompassing Theory of Everything, and galvanized interest in the idea of a quantum computer, which could solve problems of hitherto unimaginable complexity. Full bio
David Deutsch's 1997 book "The Fabric of Reality" laid the groundwork for an all-encompassing Theory of Everything, and galvanized interest in the idea of a quantum computer, which could solve problems of hitherto unimaginable complexity. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:18
I'm sure that, throughout the hundred-thousand-odd years
0
0
5000
我很確定，在人類這種物種存活的
00:23
of our species' existence,
1
5000
3000
數十萬年間，
00:26
and even before,
2
8000
3000
甚至在更早以前，
00:29
our ancestors looked up at the night sky,
3
11000
2000
我們的祖先仰望夜空，
00:31
and wondered what stars are.
4
13000
3000
想知道星星到底是什麼。
00:34
Wondering, therefore,
5
16000
2000
因此，也很想知道
00:36
how to explain what they saw
6
18000
4000
如何以那些看不到的東西
00:40
in terms of things unseen.
7
22000
5000
解釋他們所看到的一切
00:45
Okay, so, most people
8
27000
4000
好吧，當時的大多數的人
00:49
only wondered that occasionally, like today,
9
31000
3000
就像現在一樣，只是偶而會想知道
00:52
in breaks from whatever
10
34000
2000
在閒暇時，那些
00:54
normally preoccupied them.
11
36000
2000
使他們著迷的東西
00:56
But what normally preoccupied them
12
38000
4000
不過那些他們專注的東西
01:00
also involved yearning to know.
13
42000
3000
也跟求知的慾望有關。
01:03
They wished they knew
14
45000
3000
他們盼望知道
01:06
how to prevent their food supply
15
48000
2000
如何讓食物供給
01:08
from sometimes failing,
16
50000
2000
不致偶有匱乏，
01:10
and how they could rest when they were tired
17
52000
3000
還有他們疲累時該如何歇息
01:13
without risking starvation,
18
55000
4000
且不會挨餓，
01:17
be warmer, cooler, safer,
19
59000
4000
住得更加溫暖，更加涼爽，更加安全
01:21
in less pain.
20
63000
2000
以及讓生活少點的痛苦。
01:23
I bet those prehistoric cave artists
21
65000
3000
我敢說那些史前洞穴的畫家
01:26
would have loved to know
22
68000
2000
一定很想知道
01:28
how to draw better.
23
70000
2000
怎麼樣畫得更好。
01:30
In every aspect of their lives,
24
72000
5000
在生活上的各個方面，
01:35
they wished for progress, just as we do.
25
77000
5000
他們渴望進步，就跟我們一樣。
01:40
But they failed, almost completely, to make any.
26
82000
6000
不過，他們幾乎是一敗塗地，沒有獲得任何進展。
01:46
They didn't know how to.
27
88000
3000
他們不知道如何進步。
01:49
Discoveries like fire
28
91000
4000
像火這類的發現
01:53
happened so rarely, that from an individual's point of view,
29
95000
4000
極少發生，所以從人的觀點而言，
01:57
the world never improved.
30
99000
3000
整個世界沒有進步過。
02:00
Nothing new was learned.
31
102000
4000
也沒有學過什麼新事物。
02:04
The first clue to the origin of starlight
32
106000
3000
最早研究星光的起源
02:07
happened as recently as 1899: radioactivity.
33
109000
7000
發生在約1899年：放射性。
02:14
Within 40 years,
34
116000
2000
在四十年之內，
02:16
physicists discovered the whole explanation,
35
118000
4000
物理學家發現了全部的解釋，
02:20
expressed, as usual, in elegant symbols.
36
122000
5000
如同往常，這些解釋以優雅的符號表現出來。
02:25
But never mind the symbols.
37
127000
2000
不過別管這些符號。
02:27
Think how many discoveries
38
129000
4000
想想看這些符號
02:31
they represent.
39
133000
2000
代表多少發現。
02:33
Nuclei and nuclear reactions, of course.
40
135000
3000
當然，有原子核反應。
02:36
But isotopes, particles of electricity,
41
138000
7000
同位素、正負電粒子
02:43
antimatter,
42
145000
4000
反物質
02:47
neutrinos,
43
149000
2000
微中子，
02:49
the conversion of mass to energy -- that's E=mc^2 --
44
151000
4000
質能變換，就是E=mc平方
02:53
gamma rays,
45
155000
2000
伽馬射線
02:55
transmutation.
46
157000
4000
核嬗變 （一種元素通過核反應轉化成另外一種元素）
02:59
That ancient dream that had always eluded the alchemists
47
161000
5000
這些連古代鍊金術士也無能為力的夢想
03:04
was achieved through these same theories
48
166000
2000
被以上這些理論實現了
03:06
that explained starlight
49
168000
2000
這些方程式解釋了星光
03:08
and other ancient mysteries,
50
170000
3000
和其他的古代神話
03:11
and new, unexpected phenomena.
51
173000
3000
和那些新的，預料不到的現象
03:14
That all that, discovered in 40 years,
52
176000
4000
所有的這些都在這40年中發現
03:18
had not been in the previous hundred thousand,
53
180000
3000
但卻都沒有在過去的千百年中發現
03:21
was not for lack of thinking
54
183000
4000
這不是因為他們缺乏思考
03:25
about stars, and all those other urgent problems they had.
55
187000
4000
關於星星，或者那些很緊迫的問題
03:29
They even arrived at answers,
56
191000
3000
他們其實是有一套答案的
03:32
such as myths,
57
194000
2000
例如說用神話來解釋現象
03:34
that dominated their lives,
58
196000
2000
這些主宰了他們的生活
03:36
yet bore almost no resemblance
59
198000
4000
雖然這些對於事實
03:40
to the truth.
60
202000
2000
幾乎沒任何關聯性
03:42
The tragedy of that protracted stagnation
61
204000
5000
這種知識停滯所帶來的悲劇
03:47
isn't sufficiently recognized, I think.
62
209000
2000
我認為並沒有被充分的意識到
03:49
These were people with brains of
63
211000
2000
人類的大腦
03:51
essentially the same design
64
213000
3000
本質上都是一樣的構造
03:54
that eventually did discover all those things.
65
216000
5000
這樣的構造發現了這些現象
03:59
But that ability to make progress
66
221000
4000
但是那種進步的能力
04:03
remained almost unused,
67
225000
3000
並沒有充分地被發揮
04:06
until the event that
68
228000
3000
直到有些事件
04:09
revolutionized the human condition
69
231000
2000
徹底地改變了人類的現況
04:11
and changed the universe.
70
233000
2000
和改變了整個宇宙
04:13
Or so we should hope.
71
235000
2000
或者我們希望透過它大幅改變人類的生活
04:15
Because that event was the
72
237000
2000
因為這個事件是
04:17
Scientific Revolution,
73
239000
2000
科學革命
04:19
ever since which our knowledge
74
241000
2000
從我們有了
04:21
of the physical world,
75
243000
2000
對現實世界的知識以來
04:23
and of how to adapt it to our wishes,
76
245000
4000
怎麼樣利用科學技術來實現我們的願望
04:27
has been growing relentlessly.
77
249000
2000
這樣的發展就從來沒有停止過
04:29
Now, what had changed?
78
251000
3000
現在，什麽改變了？
04:32
What were people now doing for the first time
79
254000
2000
人們現在要做什麽
04:34
that made that difference
80
256000
2000
才能區別開
04:36
between stagnation
81
258000
2000
對於知識追求的停滯
04:38
and rapid, open-ended discovery?
82
260000
4000
和不斷地、開放地探索？
04:42
How to make that difference
83
264000
2000
如何區分兩者
04:44
is surely the most important universal truth
84
266000
4000
無疑地是重要且普遍的真理
04:48
that it is possible to know.
85
270000
2000
這是非常好了解的
04:50
Worryingly, there is no consensus about what it is.
86
272000
5000
麻煩的是，這沒有一個公認的方法
04:55
So, I'll tell you.
87
277000
2000
所以，我將告訴你
04:57
But I'll have to backtrack a little first.
88
279000
4000
但是在這之前我要回溯一點點時間
05:01
Before the Scientific Revolution,
89
283000
3000
到科學革命之前
05:04
they believed that everything important, knowable,
90
286000
3000
人們認為任何事情都是重要的，可以認知的
05:07
was already known,
91
289000
2000
而且都已經被知道了
05:09
enshrined in ancient writings, institutions,
92
291000
3000
這些蘊藏在古代著作中、習俗中
05:12
and in some genuinely useful rules of thumb --
93
294000
3000
和一些十分有效的經驗法則中
05:15
which were, however, entrenched as dogmas,
94
297000
4000
那些被認為是不可憾動的教義與信條
05:19
along with many falsehoods.
95
301000
2000
事實上伴隨著很多漏洞
05:21
So they believed that knowledge came from authorities
96
303000
4000
所以他們認為知識來源於權威
05:25
that actually knew very little.
97
307000
3000
但是其實權威知道的很少
05:28
And therefore progress
98
310000
3000
所以知識進步為
05:31
depended on learning how to reject
99
313000
3000
學習著去抵抗權威
05:34
the authority of learned men,
100
316000
3000
包括學識淵博的人
05:37
priests, traditions and rulers.
101
319000
4000
神父，習俗傳統和統治者
05:41
Which is why the Scientific Revolution
102
323000
3000
這就是爲什麽科學革命
05:44
had to have a wider context.
103
326000
2000
擁有更寬廣的背景：
05:46
The Enlightenment, a revolution in how
104
328000
4000
我們稱之的啓蒙運動，就是一場
05:50
people sought knowledge,
105
332000
3000
人們怎樣去獲取知識的革命
05:53
trying not to rely on authority.
106
335000
3000
他們試圖不依靠權威
05:56
"Take no one's word for it."
107
338000
2000
"不要把一個人的話當做理所當然的"
05:58
But that can't be what made the difference.
108
340000
4000
但是這些都不能徹底的改變
06:02
Authorities had been rejected before, many times.
109
344000
2000
以前權威也被挑戰過很多次
06:04
And that rarely, if ever,
110
346000
2000
但是很少
06:06
caused anything like the Scientific Revolution.
111
348000
4000
可以引起像科學革命這樣的事件
06:10
At the time, what they thought
112
352000
2000
當時，他們認為
06:12
distinguished science
113
354000
2000
現代科學這種
06:14
was a radical idea about things unseen,
114
356000
4000
對無法觀察到的事物進行解釋是頗為激進的想法
06:18
known as empiricism.
115
360000
3000
這些方法被稱為經驗主義
06:21
All knowledge derives from the senses.
116
363000
5000
所有的知道都來自感覺、感官
06:26
Well, we've seen that that can't be true.
117
368000
3000
好了，我們現在知道那不是正確的
06:29
It did help by promoting
118
371000
4000
但這確實對理解有所幫助
06:33
observation and experiment.
119
375000
2000
透過觀察和實驗
06:35
But, from the outset, it was obvious
120
377000
2000
但是，一開始這就很明顯
06:37
that there was something horribly wrong with it.
121
379000
3000
這種想法存在著錯誤
06:40
Knowledge comes from the senses.
122
382000
2000
知識來自於感覺
06:42
In what language? Certainly not the language of mathematics,
123
384000
3000
透過什麽語言？肯定不是數學語言
06:45
in which, Galileo rightly said,
124
387000
3000
伽利略提出正確的聲明
06:48
the book of nature is written.
125
390000
3000
說大自然的著作早已寫成
06:51
Look at the world. You don't see equations
126
393000
3000
看看這個世界。你沒有看見任何數學方程式
06:54
carved on to the mountainsides.
127
396000
3000
刻在任何一座山上
06:57
If you did, it would be because people
128
399000
2000
如果你看見了，那只是因為人類
06:59
had carved them.
129
401000
2000
刻上去的
07:01
By the way, why don't we do that?
130
403000
3000
順便說一句，爲什麽我們不那樣做呢?
07:04
What's wrong with us?
131
406000
2000
我們怎麼了?
07:06
(Laughter)
132
408000
1000
(笑)
07:07
Empiricism is inadequate
133
409000
2000
經驗主義是不夠的
07:09
because, well,
134
411000
2000
因為
07:11
scientific theories explain the seen in terms of the unseen.
135
413000
5000
科學理論是通過觀察不到的事物解釋觀察到的現象
07:16
And the unseen, you have to admit,
136
418000
2000
那些看不到的，你必須承認
07:18
doesn't come to us through the senses.
137
420000
2000
不是通過我們的感覺就能理解的
07:20
We don't see those nuclear reactions in stars.
138
422000
4000
我們看不到星星上的核子反應
07:24
We don't see the origin of species.
139
426000
3000
我們看不到物種的起源
07:27
We don't see the curvature of space-time,
140
429000
4000
我們看不到時空彎曲
07:31
and other universes.
141
433000
2000
和其他宇宙
07:33
But we know about those things.
142
435000
3000
但是我們知道這些
07:36
How?
143
438000
2000
透過什麽呢？
07:38
Well, the classic empiricist answer is induction.
144
440000
5000
呃，傳統的經驗主義者的回答是"透過歸納法"
07:43
The unseen resembles the seen.
145
445000
4000
看不到的跟能看到的必定有相似之處
07:47
But it doesn't.
146
449000
2000
但是事實並不是如此
07:49
You know what the clinching evidence was
147
451000
2000
你知道確鑿的證據表明
07:51
that space-time is curved?
148
453000
3000
如果時空的彎曲
07:54
It was a photograph, not of space-time,
149
456000
3000
的證據是一張照片，而不是時空本身
07:57
but of an eclipse, with a dot there rather than there.
150
459000
4000
有可能是一次日蝕，上面有小點而不是其他地方
08:01
And the evidence for evolution?
151
463000
2000
再比如說演化的證據
08:03
Some rocks and some finches.
152
465000
3000
是一些石頭和一些雀科鳥類
08:06
And parallel universes? Again: dots there,
153
468000
3000
平行的宇宙？同樣地：這有小點，
08:09
rather than there, on a screen.
154
471000
2000
而不是別的地方，顯示在營幕上
08:11
What we see, in all these cases,
155
473000
3000
我們看到的，在這些例子中
08:14
bears no resemblance to the reality
156
476000
4000
其實跟現實沒什麼太大的關係
08:18
that we conclude is responsible --
157
480000
2000
我們的結論是非常合理的
08:20
only a long chain of theoretical reasoning
158
482000
4000
只有進行一連串理論上的推理和解釋
08:24
and interpretation connects them.
159
486000
2000
才能把事實和現象做連結
08:26
"Ah!" say creationists.
160
488000
3000
哈！創造論者(相信萬物由上帝一次造成的人)說
08:29
"So you admit it's all interpretation.
161
491000
2000
你承認這都是解釋了
08:31
No one has ever seen evolution.
162
493000
3000
沒有人看見過演化
08:34
We see rocks.
163
496000
2000
我們只看過石頭標本
08:36
You have your interpretation. We have ours.
164
498000
3000
你有你的解釋。我們有我們的
08:39
Yours comes from guesswork,
165
501000
2000
你的從推測中來
08:41
ours from the Bible."
166
503000
2000
而我們的是從聖經來
08:43
But what creationist and empiricists both ignore
167
505000
6000
但是創造論者和經驗主義者都忽略了
08:49
is that, in that sense,
168
511000
2000
在某種意義上
08:51
no one has ever seen a bible either,
169
513000
3000
沒有人看過聖經是如何被創造的
08:54
that the eye only detects light, which we don't perceive.
170
516000
4000
眼睛只感覺光亮，而我們並沒有察覺
08:58
Brains only detect nerve impulses.
171
520000
3000
大腦只接受神經脈衝
09:01
And they don't perceive even those as what they really are,
172
523000
3000
他們並沒有意識到組成脈衝的
09:04
namely electrical crackles.
173
526000
2000
其實是電子訊號
09:06
So we perceive nothing as what it really is.
174
528000
5000
所以我們常常不了解現實本身為何物
09:11
Our connection to reality
175
533000
3000
感官知覺
09:14
is never just perception.
176
536000
2000
絕對不是我們用來與現實產生連繫的唯一方法
09:16
It's always, as Karl Popper put it,
177
538000
4000
如同卡爾‧波普爾所說的，
09:20
theory-laden.
178
542000
3000
科學理論和人類所掌握到的一切知識，都只不過是推測和假想
09:23
Scientific knowledge isn't derived from anything.
179
545000
3000
科學知識無從根據
09:26
It's like all knowledge. It's conjectural, guesswork,
180
548000
5000
就像其他知識一樣。是一種推斷，猜測，
09:31
tested by observation,
181
553000
2000
經過觀察的考驗，
09:33
not derived from it.
182
555000
4000
而不是發源於知識本身。
09:37
So, were testable conjectures
183
559000
3000
所以，這些禁得起測試的推論
09:40
the great innovation that opened the intellectual prison gates?
184
562000
4000
是巨大的創新嗎？並且打開了智慧的大門嗎？
09:44
No. Contrary to what's usually said,
185
566000
3000
不。跟一般說法相反，
09:47
testability is common,
186
569000
2000
可測試性是共通的特點
09:49
in myths and all sorts of other irrational modes of thinking.
187
571000
4000
在神話中和各種其他非理性的想法中。
09:53
Any crank claiming the sun will go out next Tuesday
188
575000
4000
任何一個怪人都可以聲稱太陽會在下個星期二升起
09:57
has got a testable prediction.
189
579000
3000
這就是一個可測試的預測。
10:00
Consider the ancient Greek myth
190
582000
3000
想想古希臘的神話
10:03
explaining seasons.
191
585000
3000
解釋季節。
10:06
Hades, God of the Underworld,
192
588000
2000
黑帝斯，冥界之神，
10:08
kidnaps Persephone, the Goddess of Spring,
193
590000
3000
綁架了普西芬妮，春天之神，
10:11
and negotiates a forced marriage contract,
194
593000
3000
逼迫她簽下婚姻契約
10:14
requiring her to return regularly, and lets her go.
195
596000
4000
並且要求她定時回去，然後才能放她走。
10:18
And each year,
196
600000
2000
每年
10:20
she is magically compelled to return.
197
602000
3000
她就神奇的歸去
10:23
And her mother, Demeter,
198
605000
2000
她的母親，迪米特，
10:25
Goddess of the Earth,
199
607000
2000
大地女神，
10:27
is sad, and makes it cold and barren.
200
609000
5000
十分地傷心，所以便讓土地冰冷和荒蕪。
10:32
That myth is testable.
201
614000
3000
這個神話可以驗證。
10:35
If winter is caused by Demeter's sadness,
202
617000
4000
如果冬天是因為迪米特的悲傷，
10:39
then it must happen everywhere on Earth simultaneously.
203
621000
4000
那一定會同時發生在世界上每一個角落
10:43
So if the ancient Greeks had only known that Australia
204
625000
3000
所以如果古希臘人知道澳洲
10:46
is at its warmest when Demeter is at her saddest,
205
628000
4000
在迪米特最傷心的時候是最熱的時段，
10:50
they'd have known that their theory is false.
206
632000
3000
那他們就知道他們理論的錯誤了
10:53
So what was wrong with that myth,
207
635000
3000
那些神話
10:56
and with all pre-scientific thinking,
208
638000
3000
和那些科學的想法有什麽問題嗎？
10:59
and what, then, made that momentous difference?
209
641000
5000
到底是什麽能引起這麼大的不同呢？
11:04
I think there is one thing you have to care about.
210
646000
4000
我認為你們只需要關心一件事情
11:08
And that implies
211
650000
2000
那就是
11:10
testability, the scientific method,
212
652000
3000
是否有驗證性，用科學的方法
11:13
the Enlightenment, and everything.
213
655000
2000
啓蒙運動，和之前說的一切
11:15
And here is the crucial thing.
214
657000
2000
這都是非常重要的
11:17
There is such a thing as a defect in a story.
215
659000
3000
常常在故事裡會有所缺陷
11:20
I don't just mean a logical defect. I mean a bad explanation.
216
662000
5000
我不是指邏輯缺陷。我說的是錯誤的解釋。
11:25
What does that mean? Well, explanation
217
667000
3000
這意味這什麽呢？好了，解釋
11:28
is an assertion about what's there, unseen,
218
670000
3000
是一種用看不見的事物
11:31
that accounts for what's seen.
219
673000
3000
來解釋看的見的東西
11:34
Because the explanatory role
220
676000
3000
所以有關普西芬妮的
11:37
of Persephone's marriage contract
221
679000
2000
婚約導致四季的變化
11:39
could be played equally well
222
681000
2000
用其他各種理由
11:41
by infinitely many other
223
683000
2000
來解釋的話
11:43
ad hoc entities.
224
685000
2000
應該也說的通
11:45
Why a marriage contract and not any other reason
225
687000
3000
爲什麽是婚約而不是其他原因
11:48
for regular annual action?
226
690000
4000
導致每年四季規律的行為？
11:52
Here is one. Persephone wasn't released.
227
694000
3000
這裡有一個原因。普西芬妮並沒有被釋放。
11:55
She escaped, and returns every spring
228
697000
4000
她只是逃跑，然後每年春天回來
11:59
to take revenge on Hades,
229
701000
2000
向哈德斯報仇
12:01
with her Spring powers.
230
703000
2000
用她的春天的能量。
12:03
She cools his domain with Spring air,
231
705000
5000
她用春風給她的領地降溫
12:08
venting heat up to the surface, creating summer.
232
710000
4000
讓熱氣到達表面，形成夏天。
12:12
That accounts for the same phenomena as the original myth.
233
714000
4000
這裡用原始的神話解釋了每年同樣的現象。
12:16
It's equally testable.
234
718000
3000
我們可以測試其正確與否
12:19
Yet what it asserts about reality
235
721000
3000
但是神話聲稱的內容
12:22
is, in many ways, the opposite.
236
724000
2000
在真實世界中很多方面都是相反的。
12:24
And that is possible because
237
726000
2000
那是因為
12:26
the details of the original myth
238
728000
3000
神話的細節
12:29
are unrelated to seasons,
239
731000
2000
跟季節無關
12:31
except via the myth itself.
240
733000
4000
除了透過神話讓兩者產生聯繫以外
12:35
This easy variability
241
737000
3000
這種明顯與現實有差異的
12:38
is the sign of a bad explanation,
242
740000
4000
就是一個不良的解釋
12:42
because, without a functional reason to prefer
243
744000
4000
因為，沒有一個合理的推理過程
12:46
one of countless variants,
244
748000
5000
在這些版本中，
12:51
advocating one of them, in preference to the others,
245
753000
2000
支持某一個理由，只因為它比其他的好
12:53
is irrational.
246
755000
2000
是不理性的。
12:55
So, for the essence of what
247
757000
2000
因此，什麽舉動
12:57
makes the difference to enable progress,
248
759000
3000
能引起科學的大步進展
13:00
seek good explanations,
249
762000
2000
就是尋找一個好的解釋，
13:02
the ones that can't be easily varied,
250
764000
3000
這個解釋不是很容易就改變的，
13:05
while still explaining the phenomena.
251
767000
5000
在解釋各種現象的同時。
13:10
Now, our current explanation of seasons
252
772000
3000
現在，我們當今對季節的解釋
13:13
is that the Earth's axis is tilted like that,
253
775000
4000
是地軸像這樣偏轉，
13:17
so each hemisphere tilts toward the sun for half the year,
254
779000
3000
兩個半球輪流在半年中傾斜面向太陽
13:20
and away for the other half.
255
782000
3000
並且輪流遠離太陽
13:23
Better put that up.
256
785000
2000
最好提一下。
13:25
(Laughter)
257
787000
1000
（笑聲）
13:26
That's a good explanation: hard to vary,
258
788000
5000
這就是一個好的解釋：與現實相符，很難改變，
13:31
because every detail plays a functional role.
259
793000
3000
因為每一個細節都扮演了有效的角色。
13:34
For instance, we know, independently of seasons,
260
796000
3000
比如，我們知道，季節分明，
13:37
that surfaces tilted away
261
799000
2000
地球表面遠離
13:39
from radiant heat are heated less,
262
801000
3000
輻射熱導致熱量減少，
13:42
and that a spinning sphere, in space,
263
804000
3000
地球在空間中旋轉，
13:45
points in a constant direction.
264
807000
3000
向著不變的方向。
13:48
And the tilt also explains
265
810000
3000
而傾斜也能解釋
13:51
the sun's angle of elevation at different times of year,
266
813000
4000
爲什麽在同一年中太陽高度是不同的仰角
13:55
and predicts that the seasons
267
817000
2000
這也預測了
13:57
will be out of phase in the two hemispheres.
268
819000
3000
兩個半球的季節會是不同的。
14:00
If they'd been observed in phase,
269
822000
2000
這種理論在當時看來，
14:02
the theory would have been refuted.
270
824000
2000
肯定是會被駁斥的。
14:04
But now, the fact that it's also a good explanation,
271
826000
5000
但是現在，事實就是很好的解釋，
14:09
hard to vary, makes the crucial difference.
272
831000
5000
很難推翻，與之前的解釋完全不同。
14:14
If the ancient Greeks had found out
273
836000
2000
如果古希臘人發現
14:16
about seasons in Australia,
274
838000
3000
澳洲的季節與他們不同，
14:19
they could have easily varied their myth
275
841000
2000
他們可以很簡單的修正他們的神話
14:21
to predict that.
276
843000
2000
去預測並解釋它。
14:23
For instance, when Demeter is upset,
277
845000
2000
比如，當迪米特傷心了，
14:25
she banishes heat from her vicinity,
278
847000
3000
她從附近釋放了熱
14:28
into the other hemisphere, where it makes summer.
279
850000
3000
給另一個半球，這就形成了夏天。
14:31
So, being proved wrong by observation,
280
853000
3000
即使，這些透過觀察都證明了是錯誤的，
14:34
and changing their theory accordingly,
281
856000
2000
修正了他們的理論，
14:36
still wouldn't have got the ancient Greeks
282
858000
3000
這也並不能讓古希臘人
14:39
one jot closer to understanding seasons,
283
861000
3000
完全明白季節，
14:42
because their explanation was bad: easy to vary.
284
864000
3000
因為他們的解釋是不好的：太容易被現實情況推翻
14:45
And it's only when an explanation is good
285
867000
3000
只有那些可禁得起考驗的
14:48
that it even matters whether it's testable.
286
870000
2000
才是好的解釋
14:50
If the axis-tilt theory had been refuted,
287
872000
3000
如果地軸傾斜理論被推翻了，
14:53
its defenders would have had nowhere to go.
288
875000
2000
那些異議者不可能在理論上站的住腳
14:55
No easily implemented change
289
877000
3000
因為不可能有任何的改變
14:58
could make that tilt
290
880000
2000
就能讓傾斜的地軸
15:00
cause the same seasons in both hemispheres.
291
882000
5000
導致同時在南北半球上有同樣的季節。
15:05
The search for hard-to-vary explanations
292
887000
3000
追尋符合現實、難以憾動的解釋
15:08
is the origin of all progress.
293
890000
3000
就是所有進步的源頭。
15:11
It's the basic regulating principle
294
893000
3000
這就是啟蒙運動
15:14
of the Enlightenment.
295
896000
2000
最基本的原則
15:16
So, in science, two false approaches blight progress.
296
898000
4000
所以，在科學領域，有兩個錯誤的方法將會抑制進步。
15:20
One is well known: untestable theories.
297
902000
3000
一個大家都知道的是：無法驗證的理論。
15:23
But the more important one is explanationless theories.
298
905000
4000
但是另一個更重要的是：沒法解釋的理論。
15:27
Whenever you're told that some existing statistical trend will continue,
299
909000
4000
每當你聽到一些現存的統計趨勢不斷持續，
15:31
but you aren't given a hard-to-vary account
300
913000
3000
但是他們並不能給你任何難以撼動的說法
15:34
of what causes that trend,
301
916000
3000
解釋什麽因素導致了這些趨勢，
15:37
you're being told a wizard did it.
302
919000
2000
你就好像被人隨便虎爛
15:39
When you are told that carrots have human rights
303
921000
3000
當你被告知胡蘿蔔也享有人權
15:42
because they share half our genes --
304
924000
2000
因為他們與人共享一半的基因
15:44
but not how gene percentages confer rights -- wizard.
305
926000
6000
但這不是依照基因百分比授予的權利—而是瞎扯
15:50
When someone announces that the nature-nurture debate
306
932000
4000
當有些人聲稱天性與教養的辯論
15:54
has been settled because there is evidence
307
936000
2000
已經有了結果因為有證據表明
15:56
that a given percentage of our
308
938000
2000
我們個人的政治觀點是
15:58
political opinions are genetically inherited,
309
940000
4000
來源於基因本身，
16:02
but they don't explain how genes cause opinions,
310
944000
4000
但是他們沒有解釋基因怎麼影響觀點，
16:06
they've settled nothing. They are saying that our
311
948000
2000
他們什麽都沒解決。他們說：
16:08
opinions are caused by wizards,
312
950000
2000
我們的觀點來源於神秘的力量，
16:10
and presumably so are their own.
313
952000
3000
其實是他們自己瞎編的。
16:13
That the truth consists of
314
955000
3000
真理其實就是
16:16
hard to vary assertions about reality
315
958000
4000
符合現實又難以撼動的解釋或理論
16:20
is the most important fact
316
962000
3000
這是最重要的事實
16:23
about the physical world.
317
965000
2000
對於這個現實世界。
16:25
It's a fact that is, itself, unseen,
318
967000
3000
事實就是雖然看不見，
16:28
yet impossible to vary. Thank you.
319
970000
4000
但是很難改變。謝謝。
16:32
(Applause)
320
974000
4000
(鼓掌)
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
David Deutsch - Quantum physicistDavid Deutsch's 1997 book "The Fabric of Reality" laid the groundwork for an all-encompassing Theory of Everything, and galvanized interest in the idea of a quantum computer, which could solve problems of hitherto unimaginable complexity.
Why you should listen
David Deutsch will force you to reconsider your place in the world. This legendary Oxford physicist is the leading proponent of the multiverse (or "many worlds") interpretation of quantum theory -- the idea that our universe is constantly spawning countless numbers of parallel worlds.
In his own words: "Everything in our universe -- including you and me, every atom and every galaxy -- has counterparts in these other universes." If that doesn't alter your consciousness, then the other implications he's derived from his study of subatomic physics -- including the possibility of time travel -- just might.
In The Fabric of Reality, Deutsch tied together quantum mechanics, evolution, a rationalist approach to knowledge, and a theory of computation based on the work of Alan Turing. "Our best theories are not only truer than common sense, they make more sense than common sense,"Deutsch wrote, and he continues to explore the most mind-bending aspects of particle physics.
In 2008, he became a member of the Royal Society of London.
David Deutsch | Speaker | TED.com