Thomas Pogge: Medicine for the 99 percent
Philosopher Thomas Pogge wants to ensure medications get to those who need it most. He has published on a wide range of subjects such as global justice and human rights. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
for the indefinite future.
insofar as we have health problems,
to take care of them.
and they're very effective --
than the alternatives:
emergency rooms, the morgue ...
that we have pharmacologists around,
and develop new medicines.
that we have a pharmaceutical industry
and you can tell from the fact
industry isn't well-loved.
just about with the tobacco companies
I want to talk with you about today.
the pharmaceutical industry?
how would you do it?
of three main principles.
to all the important medicines.
are very cheap to produce.
should have access
that pharmaceutical companies do,
the most important, the most damaging.
for the greatest health impact.
the whole system to be efficient.
that goes into the system to go to waste,
for red tape, and so on and so forth.
on all these three counts.
do not have access to medicines,
and that's the problem.
these medicines are very cheap to produce,
during the time that they're under patent,
that rich people can pay a lot of money.
have a temporary monopoly;
they forget about the poor.
that do the most damage,
into the phrase "the 10/90 gap."
on pharmaceutical research
that account for ninety percent
of the money is spent on diseases
of the global burden of disease.
where we spend the research money
and the problem with access --
of the human population.
of the global household income.
on the other hand,
of global household income.
and you look for profit opportunities,
"Where's the money?
of there being only one way
make money under the present system,
through markups.
the people have the most income.
for lobbying politicians
to "evergreen," as it's called.
companies to delay entry, for example.
in all the different jurisdictions.
amounts – for litigation.
against brand-name company,
against generic company ...
make a lot of profit.
goes to these wasteful activities.
even tell you what they are,
that pharmaceutical companies make
to try this medicine.
of course, are a pure waste,
to get patients over to their drug,
in the developing countries.
fifty percent of what's sold,
I can offer you a cheaper version."
or it's completely inert.
that is spent on pharmaceuticals --
now, per annum --
is absolutely going to waste,
it should be going,
of new medicines
of ones that we already have.
that the solution to the problem
on pharmaceutical companies.
have moral obligations,
and saving a human life,
to spend the money
companies be any different?
to expect pharmaceutical companies
or maybe I might act.
are bound to their shareholders.
wouldn't last very long
or she, for good purposes,
for the shareholders.
in fierce competition with one another,
than the other company,
driven out of the market.
is dependent for its income
to be sustainable.
on helping poor people
and you lose this money;
with your innovative activities.
it's just unrealistic
will solve the problem
have to do better
the pharmaceutical industry,
giving them the right incentives,
that really matter.
each day, each year,
in the developing world.
die prematurely from these diseases.
all the diseases
in the rich countries:
including good medicines.
are not getting the best medicine.
that insurance companies won't cover it,
is so absolutely ridiculous.
and patients are falsely influenced
of pharmaceutical companies.
How can we change the system?
in which we can better incentivize
the provision [of] medicines
opening up the second track
can be rewarded for their activities.
with patent-protected markups,
of the health impact
they have their choice.
partly on the other,
the Health Impact Fund work?
reward pool every year.
that the world spends on pharmaceuticals
six billion is a drop in the bucket.
but it would work with six billion,
if we introduced the Health Impact Fund
and you want to register it
for a period of 10 years.
of these annual reward pools.
your share of the health impact achieved
for eight percent of the health impact
of the reward money that year.
your product goes generic,
any further income from it.
from your product would be evaluated,
from the Health Impact Fund,
you can't mark up the price.
that the pharmaceutical company tells us
of determining what the real cost is
the production of the medicine
compete for the production,
the product from the cheapest supplier
lowest possible price to patients.
at all on selling the product,
from the health impact rewards.
of the introduction of a medicine?
to the preceding state of the art.
before the medicine came along,
treatment, because it's cheap;
between being treated
is better than the old products,
to a better product,
for the difference the new product makes.
on the Health Impact Fund
from an existing product
and it's no better,
to the existing system,
for switching somebody from one product
does not pay for that.
of quality-adjusted life years.
for about 20 years,
as a kind of plank.
before you reach 80,
the time that you live,
medicines can restore,
the taking away of these parts.
each year, we have to assess.
a considerable amount of money
with the Health Impact Fund
This is a similar method.
significant sample,
what the health impact of the medicine is
in different demographic groups ...
at the actual world --
are today rewarded.
based on performance,
trials, in the laboratory, if you like,
would look at real-world impact.
at the quality of a drug,
to target those patients
is used in the field.
stronger incentives than they do now
who takes the drug
to optimal effect.
translated into local languages,
don't make the best use of the product.
as I said, could start
not a lot of money,
spending on pharmaceuticals.
is as a new way of paying
namely, new medicines.
through the tax system,
with the other hand,
these medicines for cheap.
Fund registered medicines at cost,
politically, is that we have to make sure
visibility for innovators,
that the money is actually there,
to fund the Health Impact Fund,
predictable commitments
registration is voluntary,
a self-adjusting reward rate.
and drive the rate down.
to register, and the rate will recover.
at a reasonable level.
is beneficial for all parties.
by giving them a new market,
their public relations problems
to get the right medicine,
medicines to be developed,
or taxpayers, if you like,
of pharmaceutical innovation
directs pharmaceutical innovation
that don't even exist yet.
will always channel innovation
who have agreed to help us,
maybe to talk with your government
the Health Impact Fund scheme.
for the moment
into one jurisdiction
to the cost of the medicine for the sales,
on the basis of the health impact.
funding for the assessment,
political support
a pilot of that sort.
don't hesitate to write us
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Thomas Pogge - PhilosopherPhilosopher Thomas Pogge wants to ensure medications get to those who need it most. He has published on a wide range of subjects such as global justice and human rights.
Why you should listen
Originally from Germany, Thomas Pogge received a PhD in philosophy from Harvard in 1983. Since then, he has taught philosophy, political science, and ethics at universities around the world. His 2002 book, World Poverty and Human Rights, offers proposals on how to achieve global economic equality. In 2008, he co-authored The Health Impact Fund, which lays out the plan to make life-saving medicines accessible for everyone. He is currently Leitner Professor of Philosophy and International Affairs at Yale.
Thomas Pogge | Speaker | TED.com