TED2004
Steven Strogatz: The science of sync
Filmed:
Readability: 3.6
755,988 views
Mathematician Steven Strogatz shows how flocks of creatures (like birds, fireflies and fish) manage to synchronize and act as a unit -- when no one's giving orders. The powerful tendency extends into the realm of objects, too.
Steven Strogatz - Mathematician
In his work in applied mathematics, Steven Strogatz studies the way math and biology intersect. Full bio
In his work in applied mathematics, Steven Strogatz studies the way math and biology intersect. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:19
I was trying to think, how is sync connected to happiness,
0
1000
2000
00:21
and it occurred to me that for some reason we take pleasure in synchronizing.
1
3000
7000
00:28
We like to dance together, we like singing together.
2
10000
3000
00:31
And so, if you'll put up with this, I would like to enlist your help
3
13000
5000
00:36
with a first experiment today. The experiment is --
4
18000
4000
00:40
and I notice, by the way, that when you applauded,
5
22000
3000
00:43
that you did it in a typical North American way,
6
25000
2000
00:45
that is, you were raucous and incoherent.
7
27000
4000
00:49
You were not organized. It didn't even occur to you to clap in unison.
8
31000
5000
00:54
Do you think you could do it? I would like to see if this audience would --
9
36000
4000
00:58
no, you haven't practiced, as far as I know --
10
40000
2000
01:00
can you get it together to clap in sync?
11
42000
3000
01:04
(Clapping)
12
46000
9000
01:14
Whoa! Now, that's what we call emergent behavior.
13
56000
2000
01:16
(Laughter)
14
58000
2000
01:18
So I didn't expect that, but -- I mean, I expected you could synchronize.
15
60000
4000
01:22
It didn't occur to me you'd increase your frequency.
16
64000
3000
01:25
It's interesting.
17
67000
2000
01:27
(Laughter)
18
69000
3000
01:30
So what do we make of that? First of all, we know that you're all brilliant.
19
72000
4000
01:34
This is a room full of intelligent people, highly sensitive.
20
76000
4000
01:38
Some trained musicians out there.
21
80000
3000
01:41
Is that what enabled you to synchronize?
22
83000
2000
01:43
So to put the question a little more seriously,
23
85000
3000
01:46
let's ask ourselves what are the minimum requirements for what you just did,
24
88000
4000
01:50
for spontaneous synchronization.
25
92000
3000
01:53
Do you need, for instance, to be as smart as you are?
26
95000
4000
01:57
Do you even need a brain at all just to synchronize?
27
99000
7000
02:04
Do you need to be alive? I mean, that's a spooky thought, right?
28
106000
5000
02:09
Inanimate objects that might spontaneously synchronize themselves.
29
111000
5000
02:14
It's real. In fact, I'll try to explain today that sync is maybe one of,
30
116000
7000
02:21
if not one of the most, perhaps the most pervasive drive in all of nature.
31
123000
4000
02:25
It extends from the subatomic scale to the farthest reaches of the cosmos.
32
127000
6000
02:31
It's a deep tendency toward order in nature
33
133000
4000
02:35
that opposes what we've all been taught about entropy.
34
137000
3000
02:38
I mean, I'm not saying the law of entropy is wrong -- it's not.
35
140000
3000
02:41
But there is a countervailing force in the universe --
36
143000
2000
02:43
the tendency towards spontaneous order. And so that's our theme.
37
145000
5000
02:48
Now, to get into that, let me begin with what might have occurred to you immediately
38
150000
4000
02:52
when you hear that we're talking about synchrony in nature,
39
154000
4000
02:56
which is the glorious example of birds that flock together,
40
158000
6000
03:02
or fish swimming in organized schools.
41
164000
4000
03:06
So these are not particularly intelligent creatures,
42
168000
4000
03:10
and yet, as we'll see, they exhibit beautiful ballets.
43
172000
3000
03:15
This is from a BBC show called "Predators,"
44
177000
2000
03:17
and what we're looking at here are examples of synchrony that have to do with defense.
45
179000
5000
03:23
When you're small and vulnerable, like these starlings,
46
185000
3000
03:26
or like the fish, it helps to swarm to avoid predators, to confuse predators.
47
188000
7000
03:35
Let me be quiet for a second because this is so gorgeous.
48
197000
3000
03:53
For a long time, biologists were puzzled by this behavior,
49
215000
3000
03:56
wondering how it could be possible.
50
218000
2000
03:59
We're so used to choreography giving rise to synchrony.
51
221000
3000
04:03
These creatures are not choreographed.
52
225000
2000
04:05
They're choreographing themselves.
53
227000
2000
04:09
And only today is science starting to figure out how it works.
54
231000
3000
04:13
I'll show you a computer model made by Iain Couzin, a researcher at Oxford,
55
235000
6000
04:19
that shows how swarms work.
56
241000
2000
04:21
There are just three simple rules.
57
243000
2000
04:24
First, all the individuals are only aware of their nearest neighbors.
58
246000
4000
04:29
Second, all the individuals have a tendency to line up.
59
251000
3000
04:33
And third, they're all attracted to each other,
60
255000
3000
04:36
but they try to keep a small distance apart.
61
258000
2000
04:39
And when you build those three rules in,
62
261000
3000
04:42
automatically you start to see swarms
63
264000
2000
04:44
that look very much like fish schools or bird flocks.
64
266000
3000
04:48
Now, fish like to stay close together, about a body length apart.
65
270000
4000
04:52
Birds try to stay about three or four body lengths apart.
66
274000
3000
04:55
But except for that difference, the rules are the same for both.
67
277000
3000
05:04
Now, all this changes when a predator enters the scene.
68
286000
3000
05:09
There's a fourth rule: when a predator's coming, get out of the way.
69
291000
5000
05:23
Here on the model you see the predator attacking.
70
305000
3000
05:28
The prey move out in random directions,
71
310000
2000
05:30
and then the rule of attraction brings them back together again,
72
312000
3000
05:33
so there's this constant splitting and reforming.
73
315000
3000
05:37
And you see that in nature.
74
319000
2000
05:47
Keep in mind that, although it looks as if each individual is acting to cooperate,
75
329000
6000
05:53
what's really going on is a kind of selfish Darwinian behavior.
76
335000
4000
05:57
Each is scattering away at random to try to save its scales or feathers.
77
339000
4000
06:03
That is, out of the desire to save itself,
78
345000
3000
06:06
each creature is following these rules,
79
348000
3000
06:09
and that leads to something that's safe for all of them.
80
351000
2000
06:11
Even though it looks like they're thinking as a group, they're not.
81
353000
3000
06:32
You might wonder what exactly is the advantage to being in a swarm,
82
374000
3000
06:35
so you can think of several.
83
377000
2000
06:37
As I say, if you're in a swarm, your odds of being the unlucky one
84
379000
4000
06:41
are reduced as compared to a small group.
85
383000
3000
06:45
There are many eyes to spot danger.
86
387000
3000
06:48
And you'll see in the example with the starlings, with the birds,
87
390000
7000
06:55
when this peregrine hawk is about to attack them,
88
397000
2000
06:57
that actually waves of panic can propagate,
89
399000
3000
07:00
sending messages over great distances.
90
402000
3000
07:03
You'll see -- let's see, it's coming up possibly at the very end -- maybe not.
91
405000
8000
07:12
Information can be sent over half a kilometer away
92
414000
3000
07:15
in a very short time through this mechanism.
93
417000
3000
07:20
Yes, it's happening here.
94
422000
2000
07:22
See if you can see those waves propagating through the swarm.
95
424000
3000
07:26
It's beautiful. The birds are, we sort of understand, we think,
96
428000
4000
07:30
from that computer model, what's going on.
97
432000
2000
07:32
As I say, it's just those three simple rules,
98
434000
2000
07:34
plus the one about watch out for predators.
99
436000
2000
07:36
There doesn't seem to be anything mystical about this.
100
438000
3000
07:39
We don't, however, really understand at a mathematical level.
101
441000
3000
07:42
I'm a mathematician. We would like to be able to understand better.
102
444000
4000
07:46
I mean, I showed you a computer model, but a computer is not understanding.
103
448000
3000
07:49
A computer is, in a way, just another experiment.
104
451000
3000
07:52
We would really like to have a deeper insight into how this works
105
454000
3000
07:55
and to understand, you know, exactly where this organization comes from.
106
457000
5000
08:00
How do the rules give rise to the patterns?
107
462000
2000
08:02
There is one case that we have begun to understand better,
108
464000
3000
08:05
and it's the case of fireflies.
109
467000
3000
08:08
If you see fireflies in North America,
110
470000
2000
08:10
like so many North American sorts of things,
111
472000
2000
08:12
they tend to be independent operators. They ignore each other.
112
474000
4000
08:16
They each do their own thing, flashing on and off,
113
478000
2000
08:18
paying no attention to their neighbors.
114
480000
2000
08:20
But in Southeast Asia -- places like Thailand or Malaysia or Borneo --
115
482000
5000
08:25
there's a beautiful cooperative behavior that occurs among male fireflies.
116
487000
5000
08:30
You can see it every night along the river banks.
117
492000
3000
08:33
The trees, mangrove trees, are filled with fireflies communicating with light.
118
495000
5000
08:38
Specifically, it's male fireflies who are all flashing in perfect time together,
119
500000
5000
08:43
in perfect synchrony, to reinforce a message to the females.
120
505000
4000
08:47
And the message, as you can imagine, is "Come hither. Mate with me."
121
509000
4000
08:52
(Music)
122
514000
6000
08:59
In a second I'm going to show you a slow motion of a single firefly
123
521000
4000
09:03
so that you can get a sense. This is a single frame.
124
525000
3000
09:06
Then on, and then off -- a 30th of a second, there.
125
528000
5000
09:11
And then watch this whole river bank, and watch how precise the synchrony is.
126
533000
4000
09:18
On, more on and then off.
127
540000
3000
09:27
The combined light from these beetles -- these are actually tiny beetles --
128
549000
3000
09:30
is so bright that fishermen out at sea can use them
129
552000
3000
09:33
as navigating beacons to find their way back to their home rivers. It's stunning.
130
555000
4000
09:37
For a long time it was not believed
131
559000
2000
09:39
when the first Western travelers, like Sir Francis Drake,
132
561000
3000
09:42
went to Thailand and came back with tales of this unbelievable spectacle.
133
564000
4000
09:46
No one believed them.
134
568000
2000
09:48
We don't see anything like this in Europe or in the West.
135
570000
3000
09:51
And for a long time, even after it was documented,
136
573000
3000
09:54
it was thought to be some kind of optical illusion.
137
576000
2000
09:56
Scientific papers were published saying it was twitching eyelids
138
578000
3000
09:59
that explained it, or, you know, a human being's tendency
139
581000
4000
10:03
to see patterns where there are none.
140
585000
2000
10:05
But I hope you've convinced yourself now, with this nighttime video,
141
587000
3000
10:08
that they really were very well synchronized.
142
590000
3000
10:11
Okay, well, the issue then is, do we need to be alive
143
593000
3000
10:14
to see this kind of spontaneous order,
144
596000
2000
10:16
and I've already hinted that the answer is no.
145
598000
3000
10:21
Well, you don't have to be a whole creature.
146
603000
2000
10:23
You can even be just a single cell.
147
605000
2000
10:25
Like, take, for instance, your pacemaker cells in your heart right now.
148
607000
3000
10:28
They're keeping you alive.
149
610000
2000
10:30
Every beat of your heart depends on this crucial region, the sinoatrial node,
150
612000
5000
10:35
which has about 10,000 independent cells that would each beep,
151
617000
4000
10:39
have an electrical rhythm -- a voltage up and down --
152
621000
3000
10:42
to send a signal to the ventricles to pump.
153
624000
3000
10:45
Now, your pacemaker is not a single cell.
154
627000
3000
10:48
It's this democracy of 10,000 cells that all have to fire in unison
155
630000
3000
10:51
for the pacemaker to work correctly.
156
633000
2000
10:54
I don't want to give you the idea that synchrony is always a good idea.
157
636000
3000
10:57
If you have epilepsy, there is an instance of billions of brain cells, or at least millions,
158
639000
5000
11:02
discharging in pathological concert.
159
644000
3000
11:06
So this tendency towards order is not always a good thing.
160
648000
3000
11:10
You don't have to be alive. You don't have to be even a single cell.
161
652000
3000
11:13
If you look, for instance, at how lasers work,
162
655000
3000
11:16
that would be a case of atomic synchrony.
163
658000
3000
11:19
In a laser, what makes laser light so different from the light above my head here
164
661000
4000
11:23
is that this light is incoherent --
165
665000
2000
11:25
many different colors and different frequencies,
166
667000
3000
11:28
sort of like the way you clapped initially --
167
670000
3000
11:31
but if you were a laser, it would be rhythmic applause.
168
673000
3000
11:34
It would be all atoms pulsating in unison,
169
676000
2000
11:36
emitting light of one color, one frequency.
170
678000
3000
11:40
Now comes the very risky part of my talk,
171
682000
3000
11:43
which is to demonstrate that inanimate things can synchronize.
172
685000
4000
11:47
Hold your breath for me.
173
689000
2000
11:49
What I have here are two empty water bottles.
174
691000
4000
11:56
This is not Keith Barry doing a magic trick.
175
698000
2000
11:58
This is a klutz just playing with some water bottles.
176
700000
5000
12:03
I have some metronomes here.
177
705000
2000
12:08
Can you hear that?
178
710000
2000
12:12
All right, so, I've got a metronome,
179
714000
2000
12:14
and it's the world's smallest metronome, the -- well, I shouldn't advertise.
180
716000
4000
12:18
Anyway, so this is the world's smallest metronome.
181
720000
3000
12:21
I've set it on the fastest setting, and I'm going to now take
182
723000
3000
12:24
another one set to the same setting.
183
726000
2000
12:28
We can try this first. If I just put them on the table together,
184
730000
3000
12:33
there's no reason for them to synchronize, and they probably won't.
185
735000
3000
12:42
Maybe you'd better listen to them. I'll stand here.
186
744000
2000
12:49
What I'm hoping is that they might just drift apart
187
751000
2000
12:51
because their frequencies aren't perfectly the same.
188
753000
2000
13:01
Right? They did.
189
763000
2000
13:03
They were in sync for a while, but then they drifted apart.
190
765000
2000
13:07
And the reason is that they're not able to communicate.
191
769000
2000
13:09
Now, you might think that's a bizarre idea.
192
771000
2000
13:11
How can metronomes communicate?
193
773000
2000
13:14
Well, they can communicate through mechanical forces.
194
776000
3000
13:17
So I'm going to give them a chance to do that.
195
779000
2000
13:19
I also want to wind this one up a bit. How can they communicate?
196
781000
3000
13:22
I'm going to put them on a movable platform,
197
784000
2000
13:24
which is the "Guide to Graduate Study at Cornell." Okay? So here it is.
198
786000
9000
13:33
Let's see if we can get this to work.
199
795000
2000
13:37
My wife pointed out to me that it will work better if I put both on at the same time
200
799000
4000
13:41
because otherwise the whole thing will tip over.
201
803000
2000
13:43
All right. So there we go. Let's see. OK, I'm not trying to cheat --
202
805000
7000
13:50
let me start them out of sync. No, hard to even do that.
203
812000
5000
14:08
(Applause)
204
830000
4000
14:12
All right. So before any one goes out of sync, I'll just put those right there.
205
834000
5000
14:17
(Laughter)
206
839000
1000
14:18
Now, that might seem a bit whimsical,
207
840000
2000
14:20
but this pervasiveness of this tendency towards spontaneous order
208
842000
5000
14:25
sometimes has unexpected consequences.
209
847000
4000
14:29
And a clear case of that,
210
851000
2000
14:31
was something that happened in London in the year 2000.
211
853000
3000
14:34
The Millennium Bridge was supposed to be the pride of London --
212
856000
3000
14:37
a beautiful new footbridge erected across the Thames,
213
859000
4000
14:41
first river crossing in over 100 years in London.
214
863000
4000
14:45
There was a big competition for the design of this bridge,
215
867000
3000
14:48
and the winning proposal was submitted by an unusual team --
216
870000
4000
14:52
in the TED spirit, actually -- of an architect --
217
874000
3000
14:55
perhaps the greatest architect in the United Kingdom, Lord Norman Foster --
218
877000
4000
14:59
working with an artist, a sculptor, Sir Anthony Caro,
219
881000
5000
15:04
and an engineering firm, Ove Arup.
220
886000
4000
15:08
And together they submitted a design based on Lord Foster's vision,
221
890000
5000
15:13
which was -- he remembered as a kid reading Flash Gordon comic books,
222
895000
4000
15:17
and he said that when Flash Gordon would come to an abyss,
223
899000
3000
15:20
he would shoot what today would be a kind of a light saber.
224
902000
3000
15:23
He would shoot his light saber across the abyss, making a blade of light,
225
905000
4000
15:27
and then scamper across on this blade of light.
226
909000
2000
15:29
He said, "That's the vision I want to give to London.
227
911000
2000
15:31
I want a blade of light across the Thames."
228
913000
3000
15:35
So they built the blade of light,
229
917000
2000
15:37
and it's a very thin ribbon of steel, the world's --
230
919000
6000
15:43
probably the flattest and thinnest suspension bridge there is,
231
925000
3000
15:46
with cables that are out on the side.
232
928000
3000
15:49
You're used to suspension bridges with big droopy cables on the top.
233
931000
3000
15:52
These cables were on the side of the bridge,
234
934000
3000
15:55
like if you took a rubber band and stretched it taut across the Thames --
235
937000
4000
15:59
that's what's holding up this bridge.
236
941000
2000
16:01
Now, everyone was very excited to try it out.
237
943000
2000
16:03
On opening day, thousands of Londoners came out, and something happened.
238
945000
5000
16:08
And within two days the bridge was closed to the public.
239
950000
4000
16:12
So I want to first show you some interviews with people
240
954000
5000
16:17
who were on the bridge on opening day, who will describe what happened.
241
959000
3000
16:20
Man: It really started moving sideways and slightly up and down,
242
962000
5000
16:25
rather like being on the boat.
243
967000
3000
16:28
Woman: Yeah, it felt unstable, and it was very windy,
244
970000
3000
16:31
and I remember it had lots of flags up and down the sides, so you could definitely --
245
973000
4000
16:35
there was something going on sideways, it felt, maybe.
246
977000
3000
16:38
Interviewer: Not up and down? Boy: No.
247
980000
2000
16:40
Interviewer: And not forwards and backwards? Boy: No.
248
982000
2000
16:42
Interviewer: Just sideways. About how much was it moving, do you think?
249
984000
3000
16:45
Boy: It was about --
250
987000
2000
16:47
Interviewer: I mean, that much, or this much?
251
989000
2000
16:49
Boy: About the second one.
252
991000
2000
16:51
Interviewer: This much? Boy: Yeah.
253
993000
2000
16:53
Man: It was at least six, six to eight inches, I would have thought.
254
995000
3000
16:56
Interviewer: Right, so, at least this much? Man: Oh, yes.
255
998000
2000
16:58
Woman: I remember wanting to get off.
256
1000000
2000
17:00
Interviewer: Oh, did you? Woman: Yeah. It felt odd.
257
1002000
2000
17:02
Interviewer: So it was enough to be scary? Woman: Yeah, but I thought that was just me.
258
1004000
6000
17:08
Interviewer: Ah! Now, tell me why you had to do this?
259
1010000
3000
17:11
Boy: We had to do this because, to keep in balance
260
1013000
2000
17:13
because if you didn't keep your balance,
261
1015000
2000
17:15
then you would just fall over about, like, to the left or right, about 45 degrees.
262
1017000
6000
17:21
Interviewer: So just show me how you walk normally. Right.
263
1023000
4000
17:26
And then show me what it was like when the bridge started to go. Right.
264
1028000
5000
17:31
So you had to deliberately push your feet out sideways and --
265
1033000
4000
17:35
oh, and short steps?
266
1037000
2000
17:37
Man: That's right. And it seemed obvious to me
267
1039000
3000
17:40
that it was probably the number of people on it.
268
1042000
3000
17:44
Interviewer: Were they deliberately walking in step, or anything like that?
269
1046000
4000
17:48
Man: No, they just had to conform to the movement of the bridge.
270
1050000
4000
17:52
Steven Strogatz: All right, so that already gives you a hint of what happened.
271
1054000
3000
17:55
Think of the bridge as being like this platform.
272
1057000
4000
17:59
Think of the people as being like metronomes.
273
1061000
3000
18:02
Now, you might not be used to thinking of yourself as a metronome,
274
1064000
3000
18:05
but after all, we do walk like -- I mean, we oscillate back and forth as we walk.
275
1067000
4000
18:09
And especially if we start to walk like those people did, right?
276
1071000
3000
18:12
They all showed this strange sort of skating gait
277
1074000
4000
18:16
that they adopted once the bridge started to move.
278
1078000
3000
18:19
And so let me show you now the footage of the bridge.
279
1081000
3000
18:22
But also, after you see the bridge on opening day, you'll see an interesting clip
280
1084000
4000
18:26
of work done by a bridge engineer at Cambridge named Allan McRobie,
281
1088000
5000
18:31
who figured out what happened on the bridge,
282
1093000
2000
18:33
and who built a bridge simulator to explain exactly what the problem was.
283
1095000
4000
18:37
It was a kind of unintended positive feedback loop
284
1099000
4000
18:41
between the way the people walked and the way the bridge began to move,
285
1103000
3000
18:44
that engineers knew nothing about.
286
1106000
2000
18:46
Actually, I think the first person you'll see
287
1108000
2000
18:48
is the young engineer who was put in charge of this project. Okay.
288
1110000
4000
18:53
(Video) Interviewer: Did anyone get hurt? Engineer: No.
289
1115000
2000
18:55
Interviewer: Right. So it was quite small -- Engineer: Yes. Interviewer: -- but real?
290
1117000
3000
18:58
Engineer: Absolutely. Interviewer: You thought, "Oh, bother."
291
1120000
3000
19:01
Engineer: I felt I was disappointed about it.
292
1123000
3000
19:04
We'd spent a lot of time designing this bridge, and we'd analyzed it,
293
1126000
4000
19:08
we'd checked it to codes -- to heavier loads than the codes --
294
1130000
3000
19:11
and here it was doing something that we didn't know about.
295
1133000
3000
19:14
Interviewer: You didn't expect. Engineer: Exactly.
296
1136000
2000
19:16
Narrator: The most dramatic and shocking footage
297
1138000
3000
19:19
shows whole sections of the crowd -- hundreds of people --
298
1141000
3000
19:22
apparently rocking from side to side in unison,
299
1144000
2000
19:24
not only with each other, but with the bridge.
300
1146000
3000
19:27
This synchronized movement seemed to be driving the bridge.
301
1149000
4000
19:31
But how could the crowd become synchronized?
302
1153000
3000
19:34
Was there something special about the Millennium Bridge that caused this effect?
303
1156000
4000
19:38
This was to be the focus of the investigation.
304
1160000
4000
19:42
Interviewer: Well, at last the simulated bridge is finished, and I can make it wobble.
305
1164000
6000
19:49
Now, Allan, this is all your fault, isn't it? Allan McRobie: Yes.
306
1171000
4000
19:53
Interviewer: You designed this, yes, this simulated bridge,
307
1175000
2000
19:55
and this, you reckon, mimics the action of the real bridge?
308
1177000
3000
19:58
AM: It captures a lot of the physics, yes.
309
1180000
2000
20:00
Interviewer: Right. So if we get on it, we should be able to wobble it, yes?
310
1182000
3000
20:06
Allan McRobie is a bridge engineer from Cambridge who wrote to me,
311
1188000
3000
20:09
suggesting that a bridge simulator ought to wobble
312
1191000
3000
20:12
in the same way as the real bridge --
313
1194000
2000
20:14
provided we hung it on pendulums of exactly the right length.
314
1196000
2000
20:16
AM: This one's only a couple of tons, so it's fairly easy to get going.
315
1198000
3000
20:19
Just by walking. Interviewer: Well, it's certainly going now.
316
1201000
3000
20:22
AM: It doesn't have to be a real dangle. Just walk. It starts to go.
317
1204000
3000
20:25
Interviewer: It's actually quite difficult to walk.
318
1207000
3000
20:28
You have to be careful where you put your feet down, don't you,
319
1210000
3000
20:31
because if you get it wrong, it just throws you off your feet.
320
1213000
3000
20:34
AM: It certainly affects the way you walk, yes. You can't walk normally on it.
321
1216000
4000
20:39
Interviewer: No. If you try and put one foot in front of another,
322
1221000
2000
20:41
it's moving your feet away from under you. AM: Yes.
323
1223000
3000
20:44
Interviewer: So you've got to put your feet out sideways.
324
1226000
2000
20:47
So already, the simulator is making me walk in exactly the same way
325
1229000
3000
20:50
as our witnesses walked on the real bridge.
326
1232000
2000
20:52
AM: ... ice-skating gait. There isn't all this sort of snake way of walking.
327
1234000
3000
20:55
Interviewer: For a more convincing experiment,
328
1237000
2000
20:57
I wanted my own opening-day crowd, the sound check team.
329
1239000
3000
21:00
Their instructions: just walk normally.
330
1242000
3000
21:12
It's really intriguing because none of these people is trying to drive it.
331
1254000
4000
21:16
They're all having some difficulty walking.
332
1258000
2000
21:19
And the only way you can walk comfortably is by getting in step.
333
1261000
3000
21:22
But then, of course, everyone is driving the bridge.
334
1264000
3000
21:27
You can't help it. You're actually forced by the movement of the bridge to get into step,
335
1269000
5000
21:32
and therefore to drive it to move further.
336
1274000
2000
21:38
SS: All right, well, with that from the Ministry of Silly Walks,
337
1280000
4000
21:42
maybe I'd better end. I see I've gone over.
338
1284000
3000
21:45
But I hope that you'll go outside and see the world in a new way,
339
1287000
3000
21:48
to see all the amazing synchrony around us. Thank you.
340
1290000
3000
21:51
(Applause)
341
1293000
2000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Steven Strogatz - MathematicianIn his work in applied mathematics, Steven Strogatz studies the way math and biology intersect.
Why you should listen
Steven Strogatz studies some of the most interesting problems in applied mathematics -- such as the intersection of math and biology, looking for patterns in the human sleep-wake cycle or in swarms of blinking fireflies.
He's been looking at nonlinear dynamics and chaos applied to physics, engineering and biology, and branching out into new areas, such as explorating of the small-world phenomenon in social networks (popularly known as "six degrees of separation"), and its generalization to other complex networks in nature and technology.
Strogatz' work has been in the news as British engineers released the definitive paper on the Millenium Bridge wobble, and its roots in how people walk on an unpredictable surface.
In 2012, he re-examined the "birthday problem" >>
Steven Strogatz | Speaker | TED.com