ABOUT THE SPEAKER
David McCandless - Data journalist
David McCandless draws beautiful conclusions from complex datasets -- thus revealing unexpected insights into our world.

Why you should listen

David McCandless makes infographics -- simple, elegant ways to see information that might be too complex or too big, small, abstract or scattered to otherwise be grasped. In his new book, Information Is Beautiful (in the US, it's being called The Visual Miscellaneum), McCandless and his cadre of info designers take a spin through the world of visualized data, from hard stats on politics and climate to daffy but no less important trends in pop music.

McCandless' genius is not so much in finding jazzy new ways to show data -- the actual graphics aren't the real innovation here -- as in finding fresh ways to combine datasets to let them ping and prod each other. Reporting the number of drug deaths in the UK every year is interesting; but mapping that data onto the number of drug deaths reported by the UK press, broken down by drug, is utterly fascinating (more deaths by marijuana were reported than in fact occurred, by a factor of 484%). McCandless contributes a monthly big-think graphic to the Guardian's Data Blog, and makes viral graphics for his blog Information Is Beautiful.

More profile about the speaker
David McCandless | Speaker | TED.com
TEDGlobal 2010

David McCandless: The beauty of data visualization

Filmed:
3,250,094 views

David McCandless turns complex data sets (like worldwide military spending, media buzz, Facebook status updates) into beautiful, simple diagrams that tease out unseen patterns and connections. Good design, he suggests, is the best way to navigate information glut -- and it may just change the way we see the world.
- Data journalist
David McCandless draws beautiful conclusions from complex datasets -- thus revealing unexpected insights into our world. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:15
It feels like we're all suffering
0
0
2000
00:17
from information overload or data glut.
1
2000
3000
00:20
And the good news is there might be an easy solution to that,
2
5000
2000
00:22
and that's using our eyes more.
3
7000
2000
00:24
So, visualizing information, so that we can see
4
9000
2000
00:26
the patterns and connections that matter
5
11000
3000
00:29
and then designing that information so it makes more sense,
6
14000
3000
00:32
or it tells a story,
7
17000
2000
00:34
or allows us to focus only on the information that's important.
8
19000
3000
00:38
Failing that, visualized information can just look really cool.
9
23000
3000
00:41
So, let's see.
10
26000
2000
00:45
This is the $Billion Dollar o-Gram,
11
30000
2000
00:47
and this image arose
12
32000
2000
00:49
out of frustration I had
13
34000
2000
00:51
with the reporting of billion-dollar amounts in the press.
14
36000
2000
00:53
That is, they're meaningless without context:
15
38000
3000
00:56
500 billion for this pipeline,
16
41000
2000
00:58
20 billion for this war.
17
43000
2000
01:00
It doesn't make any sense, so the only way to understand it
18
45000
2000
01:02
is visually and relatively.
19
47000
2000
01:04
So I scraped a load of reported figures
20
49000
2000
01:06
from various news outlets
21
51000
2000
01:08
and then scaled the boxes according to those amounts.
22
53000
3000
01:11
And the colors here represent the motivation behind the money.
23
56000
3000
01:14
So purple is "fighting,"
24
59000
3000
01:17
and red is "giving money away," and green is "profiteering."
25
62000
3000
01:20
And what you can see straight away
26
65000
2000
01:22
is you start to have a different relationship to the numbers.
27
67000
2000
01:24
You can literally see them.
28
69000
2000
01:26
But more importantly, you start to see
29
71000
2000
01:28
patterns and connections between numbers
30
73000
2000
01:30
that would otherwise be scattered across multiple news reports.
31
75000
3000
01:33
Let me point out some that I really like.
32
78000
3000
01:36
This is OPEC's revenue, this green box here --
33
81000
2000
01:38
780 billion a year.
34
83000
2000
01:40
And this little pixel in the corner -- three billion --
35
85000
3000
01:43
that's their climate change fund.
36
88000
3000
01:46
Americans, incredibly generous people --
37
91000
2000
01:48
over 300 billion a year, donated to charity every year,
38
93000
3000
01:51
compared with the amount of foreign aid
39
96000
2000
01:53
given by the top 17 industrialized nations
40
98000
2000
01:55
at 120 billion.
41
100000
2000
01:57
Then of course,
42
102000
2000
01:59
the Iraq War, predicted to cost just 60 billion
43
104000
2000
02:01
back in 2003.
44
106000
3000
02:04
And it mushroomed slightly. Afghanistan and Iraq mushroomed now
45
109000
3000
02:07
to 3,000 billion.
46
112000
3000
02:10
So now it's great
47
115000
2000
02:12
because now we have this texture, and we can add numbers to it as well.
48
117000
2000
02:14
So we could say, well, a new figure comes out ... let's see African debt.
49
119000
3000
02:17
How much of this diagram do you think might be taken up
50
122000
2000
02:19
by the debt that Africa owes to the West?
51
124000
2000
02:21
Let's take a look.
52
126000
2000
02:23
So there it is:
53
128000
2000
02:25
227 billion is what Africa owes.
54
130000
2000
02:27
And the recent financial crisis,
55
132000
2000
02:29
how much of this diagram might that figure take up?
56
134000
2000
02:31
What has that cost the world? Let's take a look at that.
57
136000
3000
02:34
Dooosh -- Which I think is the appropriate sound effect
58
139000
3000
02:37
for that much money:
59
142000
2000
02:39
11,900 billion.
60
144000
4000
02:45
So, by visualizing this information,
61
150000
2000
02:47
we turned it into a landscape
62
152000
2000
02:49
that you can explore with your eyes,
63
154000
2000
02:51
a kind of map really, a sort of information map.
64
156000
2000
02:53
And when you're lost in information,
65
158000
2000
02:55
an information map is kind of useful.
66
160000
3000
02:58
So I want to show you another landscape now.
67
163000
2000
03:00
We need to imagine what a landscape
68
165000
2000
03:02
of the world's fears might look like.
69
167000
3000
03:05
Let's take a look.
70
170000
2000
03:07
This is Mountains Out of Molehills,
71
172000
2000
03:09
a timeline of global media panic.
72
174000
2000
03:11
(Laughter)
73
176000
2000
03:13
So, I'll label this for you in a second.
74
178000
2000
03:15
But the height here, I want to point out,
75
180000
2000
03:17
is the intensity of certain fears
76
182000
2000
03:19
as reported in the media.
77
184000
2000
03:21
Let me point them out.
78
186000
2000
03:23
So this, swine flu -- pink.
79
188000
4000
03:27
Bird flu.
80
192000
2000
03:29
SARS -- brownish here. Remember that one?
81
194000
3000
03:32
The millennium bug,
82
197000
3000
03:35
terrible disaster.
83
200000
2000
03:37
These little green peaks
84
202000
2000
03:39
are asteroid collisions.
85
204000
2000
03:41
(Laughter)
86
206000
2000
03:43
And in summer, here, killer wasps.
87
208000
2000
03:45
(Laughter)
88
210000
8000
03:53
So these are what our fears look like
89
218000
2000
03:55
over time in our media.
90
220000
2000
03:57
But what I love -- and I'm a journalist --
91
222000
2000
03:59
and what I love is finding hidden patterns; I love being a data detective.
92
224000
3000
04:02
And there's a very interesting and odd pattern hidden in this data
93
227000
3000
04:05
that you can only see when you visualize it.
94
230000
2000
04:07
Let me highlight it for you.
95
232000
2000
04:09
See this line, this is a landscape for violent video games.
96
234000
3000
04:12
As you can see, there's a kind of odd, regular pattern in the data,
97
237000
3000
04:15
twin peaks every year.
98
240000
2000
04:17
If we look closer, we see those peaks occur
99
242000
2000
04:19
at the same month every year.
100
244000
3000
04:22
Why?
101
247000
2000
04:24
Well, November, Christmas video games come out,
102
249000
2000
04:26
and there may well be an upsurge in the concern about their content.
103
251000
3000
04:29
But April isn't a particularly massive month
104
254000
3000
04:32
for video games.
105
257000
2000
04:34
Why April?
106
259000
2000
04:36
Well, in April 1999 was the Columbine shooting,
107
261000
3000
04:39
and since then, that fear
108
264000
2000
04:41
has been remembered by the media
109
266000
2000
04:43
and echoes through the group mind gradually through the year.
110
268000
2000
04:45
You have retrospectives, anniversaries,
111
270000
3000
04:48
court cases, even copy-cat shootings,
112
273000
3000
04:51
all pushing that fear into the agenda.
113
276000
3000
04:54
And there's another pattern here as well. Can you spot it?
114
279000
2000
04:56
See that gap there? There's a gap,
115
281000
2000
04:58
and it affects all the other stories.
116
283000
2000
05:00
Why is there a gap there?
117
285000
2000
05:02
You see where it starts? September 2001,
118
287000
3000
05:05
when we had something very real
119
290000
2000
05:07
to be scared about.
120
292000
2000
05:09
So, I've been working as a data journalist for about a year,
121
294000
3000
05:12
and I keep hearing a phrase
122
297000
2000
05:14
all the time, which is this:
123
299000
3000
05:17
"Data is the new oil."
124
302000
2000
05:19
Data is the kind of ubiquitous resource
125
304000
3000
05:22
that we can shape to provide new innovations and new insights,
126
307000
3000
05:25
and it's all around us, and it can be mined very easily.
127
310000
3000
05:28
It's not a particularly great metaphor in these times,
128
313000
3000
05:31
especially if you live around the Gulf of Mexico,
129
316000
3000
05:34
but I would, perhaps, adapt this metaphor slightly,
130
319000
2000
05:36
and I would say that data is the new soil.
131
321000
3000
05:40
Because for me, it feels like a fertile, creative medium.
132
325000
3000
05:43
Over the years, online,
133
328000
2000
05:45
we've laid down
134
330000
3000
05:48
a huge amount of information and data,
135
333000
2000
05:50
and we irrigate it with networks and connectivity,
136
335000
2000
05:52
and it's been worked and tilled by unpaid workers and governments.
137
337000
3000
05:55
And, all right, I'm kind of milking the metaphor a little bit.
138
340000
3000
05:58
But it's a really fertile medium,
139
343000
3000
06:01
and it feels like visualizations, infographics, data visualizations,
140
346000
3000
06:04
they feel like flowers blooming from this medium.
141
349000
3000
06:07
But if you look at it directly,
142
352000
2000
06:09
it's just a lot of numbers and disconnected facts.
143
354000
2000
06:11
But if you start working with it and playing with it in a certain way,
144
356000
3000
06:14
interesting things can appear and different patterns can be revealed.
145
359000
3000
06:17
Let me show you this.
146
362000
2000
06:19
Can you guess what this data set is?
147
364000
3000
06:22
What rises twice a year,
148
367000
2000
06:24
once in Easter
149
369000
2000
06:26
and then two weeks before Christmas,
150
371000
2000
06:28
has a mini peak every Monday,
151
373000
2000
06:30
and then flattens out over the summer?
152
375000
2000
06:32
I'll take answers.
153
377000
2000
06:34
(Audience: Chocolate.) David McCandless: Chocolate.
154
379000
2000
06:36
You might want to get some chocolate in.
155
381000
3000
06:39
Any other guesses?
156
384000
2000
06:41
(Audience: Shopping.) DM: Shopping.
157
386000
2000
06:43
Yeah, retail therapy might help.
158
388000
3000
06:46
(Audience: Sick leave.)
159
391000
2000
06:48
DM: Sick leave. Yeah, you'll definitely want to take some time off.
160
393000
2000
06:50
Shall we see?
161
395000
2000
06:53
(Laughter)
162
398000
8000
07:01
(Applause)
163
406000
3000
07:04
So, the information guru Lee Byron and myself,
164
409000
3000
07:07
we scraped 10,000 status Facebook updates
165
412000
3000
07:10
for the phrase "break-up" and "broken-up"
166
415000
2000
07:12
and this is the pattern we found --
167
417000
2000
07:14
people clearing out for Spring Break,
168
419000
2000
07:16
(Laughter)
169
421000
5000
07:21
coming out of very bad weekends on a Monday,
170
426000
2000
07:23
being single over the summer,
171
428000
3000
07:26
and then the lowest day of the year, of course: Christmas Day.
172
431000
3000
07:29
Who would do that?
173
434000
3000
07:32
So there's a titanic amount of data out there now,
174
437000
2000
07:34
unprecedented.
175
439000
2000
07:37
But if you ask the right kind of question,
176
442000
2000
07:39
or you work it in the right kind of way,
177
444000
2000
07:41
interesting things can emerge.
178
446000
3000
07:44
So information is beautiful. Data is beautiful.
179
449000
3000
07:47
I wonder if I could make my life beautiful.
180
452000
3000
07:50
And here's my visual C.V.
181
455000
2000
07:52
I'm not quite sure I've succeeded.
182
457000
2000
07:54
Pretty blocky, the colors aren't that great.
183
459000
2000
07:56
But I wanted to convey something to you.
184
461000
3000
07:59
I started as a programmer,
185
464000
2000
08:01
and then I worked as a writer for many years, about 20 years,
186
466000
2000
08:03
in print, online and then in advertising,
187
468000
2000
08:05
and only recently have I started designing.
188
470000
3000
08:08
And I've never been to design school.
189
473000
2000
08:10
I've never studied art or anything.
190
475000
3000
08:13
I just kind of learned through doing.
191
478000
2000
08:15
And when I started designing,
192
480000
2000
08:17
I discovered an odd thing about myself.
193
482000
2000
08:19
I already knew how to design,
194
484000
2000
08:21
but it wasn't like I was amazingly brilliant at it,
195
486000
3000
08:24
but more like I was sensitive
196
489000
2000
08:26
to the ideas of grids and space
197
491000
2000
08:28
and alignment and typography.
198
493000
2000
08:30
It's almost like being exposed
199
495000
2000
08:32
to all this media over the years
200
497000
2000
08:34
had instilled a kind of dormant design literacy in me.
201
499000
3000
08:37
And I don't feel like I'm unique.
202
502000
2000
08:39
I feel that everyday, all of us now
203
504000
2000
08:41
are being blasted by information design.
204
506000
3000
08:44
It's being poured into our eyes through the Web,
205
509000
2000
08:46
and we're all visualizers now;
206
511000
2000
08:48
we're all demanding a visual aspect
207
513000
2000
08:50
to our information.
208
515000
3000
08:53
There's something almost quite magical about visual information.
209
518000
3000
08:56
It's effortless, it literally pours in.
210
521000
3000
08:59
And if you're navigating a dense information jungle,
211
524000
3000
09:02
coming across a beautiful graphic
212
527000
2000
09:04
or a lovely data visualization,
213
529000
2000
09:06
it's a relief, it's like coming across a clearing in the jungle.
214
531000
3000
09:09
I was curious about this, so it led me
215
534000
2000
09:11
to the work of a Danish physicist
216
536000
2000
09:13
called Tor Norretranders,
217
538000
2000
09:15
and he converted the bandwidth of the senses into computer terms.
218
540000
3000
09:19
So here we go. This is your senses,
219
544000
2000
09:21
pouring into your senses every second.
220
546000
2000
09:23
Your sense of sight is the fastest.
221
548000
3000
09:26
It has the same bandwidth as a computer network.
222
551000
3000
09:29
Then you have touch, which is about the speed of a USB key.
223
554000
3000
09:32
And then you have hearing and smell,
224
557000
2000
09:34
which has the throughput of a hard disk.
225
559000
2000
09:36
And then you have poor old taste,
226
561000
2000
09:38
which is like barely the throughput of a pocket calculator.
227
563000
3000
09:41
And that little square in the corner, a naught .7 percent,
228
566000
3000
09:44
that's the amount we're actually aware of.
229
569000
3000
09:47
So a lot of your vision --
230
572000
2000
09:49
the bulk of it is visual, and it's pouring in.
231
574000
2000
09:51
It's unconscious.
232
576000
2000
09:53
The eye is exquisitely sensitive
233
578000
3000
09:56
to patterns in variations in color, shape and pattern.
234
581000
3000
09:59
It loves them, and it calls them beautiful.
235
584000
2000
10:01
It's the language of the eye.
236
586000
2000
10:03
If you combine the language of the eye with the language of the mind,
237
588000
2000
10:05
which is about words and numbers and concepts,
238
590000
3000
10:08
you start speaking two languages simultaneously,
239
593000
3000
10:11
each enhancing the other.
240
596000
3000
10:14
So, you have the eye, and then you drop in the concepts.
241
599000
3000
10:17
And that whole thing -- it's two languages
242
602000
2000
10:19
both working at the same time.
243
604000
2000
10:21
So we can use this new kind of language, if you like,
244
606000
2000
10:23
to alter our perspective or change our views.
245
608000
3000
10:26
Let me ask you a simple question
246
611000
2000
10:28
with a really simple answer:
247
613000
2000
10:30
Who has the biggest military budget?
248
615000
2000
10:32
It's got to be America, right?
249
617000
2000
10:34
Massive. 609 billion in 2008 --
250
619000
2000
10:36
607, rather.
251
621000
2000
10:38
So massive, in fact, that it can contain
252
623000
2000
10:40
all the other military budgets in the world inside itself.
253
625000
3000
10:43
Gobble, gobble, gobble, gobble, gobble.
254
628000
2000
10:45
Now, you can see Africa's total debt there
255
630000
2000
10:47
and the U.K. budget deficit for reference.
256
632000
2000
10:49
So that might well chime
257
634000
2000
10:51
with your view that America
258
636000
2000
10:53
is a sort of warmongering military machine,
259
638000
3000
10:56
out to overpower the world
260
641000
2000
10:58
with its huge industrial-military complex.
261
643000
3000
11:01
But is it true that America has the biggest military budget?
262
646000
3000
11:04
Because America is an incredibly rich country.
263
649000
2000
11:06
In fact, it's so massively rich
264
651000
2000
11:08
that it can contain the four other
265
653000
2000
11:10
top industrialized nations' economies
266
655000
2000
11:12
inside itself, it's so vastly rich.
267
657000
3000
11:15
So its military budget is bound to be enormous.
268
660000
3000
11:18
So, to be fair and to alter our perspective,
269
663000
2000
11:20
we have to bring in another data set,
270
665000
2000
11:22
and that data set is GDP, or the country's earnings.
271
667000
2000
11:24
Who has the biggest budget as a proportion of GDP?
272
669000
2000
11:26
Let's have a look.
273
671000
2000
11:28
That changes the picture considerably.
274
673000
3000
11:31
Other countries pop into view that you, perhaps, weren't considering,
275
676000
3000
11:34
and American drops into eighth.
276
679000
2000
11:36
Now you can also do this with soldiers.
277
681000
2000
11:38
Who has the most soldiers? It's got to be China.
278
683000
2000
11:40
Of course, 2.1 million.
279
685000
2000
11:42
Again, chiming with your view
280
687000
2000
11:44
that China has a militarized regime
281
689000
2000
11:46
ready to, you know, mobilize its enormous forces.
282
691000
2000
11:48
But of course, China has an enormous population.
283
693000
3000
11:51
So if we do the same,
284
696000
2000
11:53
we see a radically different picture.
285
698000
2000
11:55
China drops to 124th.
286
700000
2000
11:57
It actually has a tiny army
287
702000
2000
11:59
when you take other data into consideration.
288
704000
3000
12:02
So, absolute figures, like the military budget,
289
707000
2000
12:04
in a connected world,
290
709000
2000
12:06
don't give you the whole picture.
291
711000
2000
12:08
They're not as true as they could be.
292
713000
2000
12:10
We need relative figures that are connected to other data
293
715000
3000
12:13
so that we can see a fuller picture,
294
718000
2000
12:15
and then that can lead to us changing our perspective.
295
720000
2000
12:17
As Hans Rosling, the master,
296
722000
2000
12:19
my master, said,
297
724000
3000
12:22
"Let the dataset change your mindset."
298
727000
3000
12:26
And if it can do that, maybe it can also change your behavior.
299
731000
3000
12:29
Take a look at this one.
300
734000
2000
12:31
I'm a bit of a health nut.
301
736000
2000
12:33
I love taking supplements and being fit,
302
738000
3000
12:36
but I can never understand what's going on in terms of evidence.
303
741000
3000
12:39
There's always conflicting evidence.
304
744000
2000
12:41
Should I take vitamin C? Should I be taking wheatgrass?
305
746000
2000
12:43
This is a visualization of all the evidence
306
748000
2000
12:45
for nutritional supplements.
307
750000
2000
12:47
This kind of diagram is called a balloon race.
308
752000
3000
12:50
So the higher up the image,
309
755000
2000
12:52
the more evidence there is for each supplement.
310
757000
3000
12:55
And the bubbles correspond to popularity as regards to Google hits.
311
760000
3000
12:58
So you can immediately apprehend
312
763000
3000
13:01
the relationship between efficacy and popularity,
313
766000
3000
13:04
but you can also, if you grade the evidence,
314
769000
3000
13:07
do a "worth it" line.
315
772000
2000
13:09
So supplements above this line are worth investigating,
316
774000
3000
13:12
but only for the conditions listed below,
317
777000
3000
13:15
and then the supplements below the line
318
780000
3000
13:18
are perhaps not worth investigating.
319
783000
2000
13:20
Now this image constitutes a huge amount of work.
320
785000
3000
13:23
We scraped like 1,000 studies from PubMed,
321
788000
3000
13:26
the biomedical database,
322
791000
2000
13:28
and we compiled them and graded them all.
323
793000
3000
13:31
And it was incredibly frustrating for me
324
796000
2000
13:33
because I had a book of 250 visualizations to do for my book,
325
798000
3000
13:36
and I spent a month doing this,
326
801000
2000
13:38
and I only filled two pages.
327
803000
2000
13:40
But what it points to
328
805000
2000
13:42
is that visualizing information like this
329
807000
2000
13:44
is a form of knowledge compression.
330
809000
2000
13:46
It's a way of squeezing an enormous amount
331
811000
2000
13:48
of information and understanding
332
813000
2000
13:50
into a small space.
333
815000
2000
13:52
And once you've curated that data, and once you've cleaned that data,
334
817000
2000
13:54
and once it's there,
335
819000
2000
13:56
you can do cool stuff like this.
336
821000
2000
13:58
So I converted this into an interactive app,
337
823000
2000
14:00
so I can now generate this application online --
338
825000
2000
14:02
this is the visualization online --
339
827000
2000
14:04
and I can say, "Yeah, brilliant."
340
829000
2000
14:06
So it spawns itself.
341
831000
2000
14:08
And then I can say, "Well, just show me the stuff
342
833000
2000
14:10
that affects heart health."
343
835000
2000
14:12
So let's filter that out.
344
837000
2000
14:14
So heart is filtered out, so I can see if I'm curious about that.
345
839000
3000
14:17
I think, "No, no. I don't want to take any synthetics,
346
842000
2000
14:19
I just want to see plants and --
347
844000
3000
14:22
just show me herbs and plants. I've got all the natural ingredients."
348
847000
3000
14:25
Now this app is spawning itself
349
850000
2000
14:27
from the data.
350
852000
2000
14:29
The data is all stored in a Google Doc,
351
854000
2000
14:31
and it's literally generating itself from that data.
352
856000
3000
14:34
So the data is now alive; this is a living image,
353
859000
2000
14:36
and I can update it in a second.
354
861000
2000
14:38
New evidence comes out. I just change a row on a spreadsheet.
355
863000
2000
14:40
Doosh! Again, the image recreates itself.
356
865000
4000
14:44
So it's cool.
357
869000
2000
14:46
It's kind of living.
358
871000
3000
14:49
But it can go beyond data,
359
874000
2000
14:51
and it can go beyond numbers.
360
876000
2000
14:53
I like to apply information visualization
361
878000
2000
14:55
to ideas and concepts.
362
880000
3000
14:58
This is a visualization
363
883000
2000
15:00
of the political spectrum,
364
885000
2000
15:02
an attempt for me to try
365
887000
2000
15:04
and understand how it works
366
889000
2000
15:06
and how the ideas percolate down
367
891000
2000
15:08
from government into society and culture,
368
893000
2000
15:10
into families, into individuals, into their beliefs
369
895000
3000
15:13
and back around again in a cycle.
370
898000
3000
15:16
What I love about this image
371
901000
2000
15:18
is it's made up of concepts,
372
903000
2000
15:20
it explores our worldviews
373
905000
2000
15:22
and it helps us -- it helps me anyway --
374
907000
2000
15:24
to see what others think,
375
909000
2000
15:26
to see where they're coming from.
376
911000
2000
15:28
And it feels just incredibly cool to do that.
377
913000
3000
15:31
What was most exciting for me
378
916000
3000
15:34
designing this
379
919000
2000
15:36
was that, when I was designing this image,
380
921000
2000
15:38
I desperately wanted this side, the left side,
381
923000
3000
15:41
to be better than the right side --
382
926000
2000
15:43
being a journalist, a Left-leaning person --
383
928000
3000
15:46
but I couldn't, because I would have created
384
931000
2000
15:48
a lopsided, biased diagram.
385
933000
3000
15:51
So, in order to really create a full image,
386
936000
3000
15:54
I had to honor the perspectives on the right-hand side
387
939000
3000
15:57
and at the same time, uncomfortably recognize
388
942000
3000
16:00
how many of those qualities were actually in me,
389
945000
3000
16:03
which was very, very annoying and uncomfortable.
390
948000
2000
16:05
(Laughter)
391
950000
4000
16:09
But not too uncomfortable,
392
954000
2000
16:11
because there's something unthreatening
393
956000
3000
16:14
about seeing a political perspective,
394
959000
2000
16:16
versus being told or forced to listen to one.
395
961000
3000
16:19
You're capable of holding conflicting viewpoints
396
964000
3000
16:22
joyously when you can see them.
397
967000
2000
16:24
It's even fun to engage with them
398
969000
2000
16:26
because it's visual.
399
971000
2000
16:28
So that's what's exciting to me,
400
973000
2000
16:30
seeing how data can change my perspective
401
975000
2000
16:32
and change my mind midstream --
402
977000
2000
16:34
beautiful, lovely data.
403
979000
3000
16:38
So, just to wrap up,
404
983000
2000
16:40
I wanted to say
405
985000
2000
16:42
that it feels to me that design is about solving problems
406
987000
2000
16:44
and providing elegant solutions,
407
989000
3000
16:47
and information design is about
408
992000
2000
16:49
solving information problems.
409
994000
2000
16:51
It feels like we have a lot of information problems
410
996000
2000
16:53
in our society at the moment,
411
998000
2000
16:55
from the overload and the saturation
412
1000000
2000
16:57
to the breakdown of trust and reliability
413
1002000
2000
16:59
and runaway skepticism and lack of transparency,
414
1004000
2000
17:01
or even just interestingness.
415
1006000
2000
17:03
I mean, I find information just too interesting.
416
1008000
2000
17:05
It has a magnetic quality that draws me in.
417
1010000
3000
17:09
So, visualizing information
418
1014000
2000
17:11
can give us a very quick solution to those kinds of problems.
419
1016000
3000
17:14
Even when the information is terrible,
420
1019000
2000
17:16
the visual can be quite beautiful.
421
1021000
3000
17:19
Often we can get clarity
422
1024000
3000
17:22
or the answer to a simple question very quickly,
423
1027000
2000
17:24
like this one,
424
1029000
2000
17:26
the recent Icelandic volcano.
425
1031000
3000
17:29
Which was emitting the most CO2?
426
1034000
2000
17:31
Was it the planes or the volcano,
427
1036000
2000
17:33
the grounded planes or the volcano?
428
1038000
2000
17:35
So we can have a look.
429
1040000
2000
17:37
We look at the data and we see:
430
1042000
2000
17:39
Yep, the volcano emitted 150,000 tons;
431
1044000
2000
17:41
the grounded planes would have emitted
432
1046000
2000
17:43
345,000 if they were in the sky.
433
1048000
3000
17:46
So essentially, we had our first carbon-neutral volcano.
434
1051000
3000
17:49
(Laughter)
435
1054000
2000
17:51
(Applause)
436
1056000
9000
18:00
And that is beautiful. Thank you.
437
1065000
3000
18:03
(Applause)
438
1068000
8000

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
David McCandless - Data journalist
David McCandless draws beautiful conclusions from complex datasets -- thus revealing unexpected insights into our world.

Why you should listen

David McCandless makes infographics -- simple, elegant ways to see information that might be too complex or too big, small, abstract or scattered to otherwise be grasped. In his new book, Information Is Beautiful (in the US, it's being called The Visual Miscellaneum), McCandless and his cadre of info designers take a spin through the world of visualized data, from hard stats on politics and climate to daffy but no less important trends in pop music.

McCandless' genius is not so much in finding jazzy new ways to show data -- the actual graphics aren't the real innovation here -- as in finding fresh ways to combine datasets to let them ping and prod each other. Reporting the number of drug deaths in the UK every year is interesting; but mapping that data onto the number of drug deaths reported by the UK press, broken down by drug, is utterly fascinating (more deaths by marijuana were reported than in fact occurred, by a factor of 484%). McCandless contributes a monthly big-think graphic to the Guardian's Data Blog, and makes viral graphics for his blog Information Is Beautiful.

More profile about the speaker
David McCandless | Speaker | TED.com