Jonathan Marks: In praise of conflict
Jonathan Marks: 政府应该与公司斗争,而不是与他们合作
Jonathan Marks works at the intersections of ethics, law and policy -- writing and speaking about torture, obesity, fracking, health care and other pressing issues of our time. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
and human rights lawyer
一名人权律师的时候,
在这栋大楼里召开,
by an accident of history,
who had just quit his job
one morning and said,
about human rights abuses in China."
做点事情吧。”
做任何事情,
about human rights abuses in China
trade relations with China."
就夹着尾巴离开了。
with his tail between his legs,
he returned again to his boss,
做点事情吧,
about human rights in Burma,"
做任何事情,
do anything about human rights in Burma
any trade relations with Burma."
he knew he had to leave.
that got to him.
在密切的商讨中
with other governments,
were being harmed.
a vision of the world.
不在谈判桌上的人,
who are not at the table,
被剥夺选择权的人们,
an obligation to protect.
somewhat skeptical of a lawyer
说着冲突的好处
giving talks about ethics for free.
关于道德的免费演讲。
我的经济状况在下滑。
I'm downwardly mobile.
we lead our personal lives,
我们个人生活的方式,
to one side for the moment,
we think about major problems
主要问题的思考方式。
in the United States,
three branches of government,
司法机关。
and the judicial branch.
more sacred in our Constitution,
或者其他任何自由的宪法里,
and the judicial powers."
and exercise of power.
the perils of influence.
the constitutionality of laws
of government accountable
relationships with them.
as one famous scholar put it,
struggle with each other.
the importance of struggle
get together and agree
两个美国的航空公司联合起来,
降到250美金以下。
below 250 dollars a ticket.
some would say collusion,
two airlines were to say,
两家航空公司协议说,
洛杉矶到芝加哥的航线,”
the route from LA to Chicago,"
“那我们飞芝加哥到华盛顿的航线,
the route from Chicago to DC,
or collusion instead of competition,
而不是竞争,
the importance of struggle
我们理解斗争的重要性,
between branches of government,
the importance of conflict
我们也理解冲突的重要性,
among corporations,
between the public and the private.
进行合作,
are collaborating with industry
and the environment,
或加剧了问题的公司,
with the very corporations
the problems they are trying to solve.
decided to address a serious problem:
一个严重的问题,
学校里的卫生问题。
with national and local governments
与国家和当地的政府部门合作,
multinational soda company.
than one million dollars,
of a months-long promotional campaign
and color scheme.
颜色搭配。
for its products.
for the intergovernmental agency,
这里面有很严重的问题。
to promote sustainable living.
of sugar-sweetened beverages
由塑料瓶灌起来的,
and drunk out of plastic bottles
困扰的国家,
grappling with obesity,
from a public health
这不是个可持续战略,
one public health problem,
播下了种子。
of dozens I discovered
的书做研究,
between government and industry.
about the initiatives in parks
有关伦敦和整个英国的公园,
提倡大家锻炼,
promoting exercise,
creating voluntary pledges
企业的合作关系中
在公共卫生问题中变成了一种模式,
have become the paradigm in public health,
from the point of view of industry.
这是合理的。
一种公共卫生问题的解决方法。
public health problems and their solutions
their commercial interests.
个人缺少锻炼而导致的问题。
and lack of physical activity.
involving major corporations.
in strategies of influence
会促进公共利益的事
to which industry will not agree.
to increased regulation
避开更多的监管,
stave off even more regulation
一些竞争者。
out of the market.
特定的事情,
to do certain things,
of their unhealthy products,
competition law,
means reaching agreement with industry.
与企业达成一致时。
已经被出售了。
have been sold.
is building a well pad on your land.
建一个井场。
of the Hallowich family.
of the noise, vibration
from the flaring of natural gas.
这张图片就是出现在匹兹堡邮报,
where this image appeared,
we discovered why they fell silent.
"What happened to the Hallowiches?"
“Hallowiches一家人怎么了?”
石油开采公司,
had made a secret settlement
“要么接受、要么放弃”的协议。
a take-it-or-leave-it settlement.
and start your lives again,
of your experience with our company,
你与我们公司之间的事情,
experience with fracking,
可能会在体检中检查出来。
by a medical examination.
the Hallowiches for accepting
to silence a squeaky wheel.
is the legal and regulatory system,
networks of agreements
and seal off data points
流行病专家们封锁了数据。
and epidemiologists,
from issuing a violation notice
避免开出违规通知。
bad from a public health point of view;
角度来看是不好的,
not because they are isolated examples.
他们不仅仅是独立的案例。
of the public official
suicidal thoughts in adolescents.
青少年自杀倾向的事实。
跟踪调查食品公司,
who went after the food company
health benefits of its yogurt.
酸奶对健康的好处。
directed at both sides of the aisle
in the darkness,
we need to engage in conflict.
我们需要一些斗争,
in direct conflict with corporations.
are inherently good
act to promote their commercial interests,
公司会为促进他们的商业利润行动。
undermining or promoting the common good.
要么会促进共同利益。
of governments
守护人。
of our common good.
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Jonathan Marks - Bioethicist, lawyerJonathan Marks works at the intersections of ethics, law and policy -- writing and speaking about torture, obesity, fracking, health care and other pressing issues of our time.
Why you should listen
After studying law at Oxford University, Jonathan Marks qualified as a barrister and mediator, and he spent a decade in full-time practice in London. He became an expert on human rights, working on cases about torture (the Pinochet case), the protection of privacy and personal data, and the regulation of food, drugs and the environment.
The Greenwall Fellowship in Bioethics and Health Policy at Johns Hopkins and Georgetown Universities led to his current appointment as Director of the Bioethics Program at Penn State University, where he is also affiliated with the Rock Ethics Institute, Penn State Law and the School of International Affairs. He remains an academic member of Matrix, a London barristers' chambers with offices in Geneva.
Marks is passionate about teaching and lecturing, as his TED talk, and an article in the New York Times both attest. The talk offers a preview of his book manuscript, The Perils of Partnership. It also draws on research he conducted during his six-year affiliation with the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard and during residencies at the Hastings Center and at the Brocher Foundation in Geneva.
Learn more about Marks's ideas from several articles, essays, and op-eds here.
Jonathan Marks | Speaker | TED.com