TEDGlobal 2012
Keith Chen: Could your language affect your ability to save money?
陳凱斯：你的語言會影響你的儲蓄能力嗎？
Filmed:
Readability: 4.3
1,880,497 views
經濟學家能從語言學家身上學到甚麼？根據自己的研究，行為經濟學家陳凱斯向我們介紹一種奇妙的行為模式：沒有未來式的語言 -- “明天下雨” 而非 "明天將會下雨" -- 和高儲蓄率息息相關。請大家進一步了解陳先生的發現。
Keith Chen - Behavioral economist
Keith Chen's research suggests that the language you speak may impact the way you think about your future. Full bio
Keith Chen's research suggests that the language you speak may impact the way you think about your future. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:16
The global economic financial crisis has reignited public interest
0
500
4500
全球性的經濟金融危機再次引起大眾的關注
00:20
in something that's actually one of the oldest questions in economics,
1
5000
3416
他們關注的，其實就是經濟學最古老的問題之一
00:24
dating back to at least before Adam Smith.
2
8416
2684
這至少要追朔到亞當 · 史密斯 (現代經濟學之父) 之前
00:27
And that is, why is it that countries with seemingly similar economies and institutions
3
11100
5484
這個問題是，為什麼經濟模式
和金融體制類似的國家
和金融體制類似的國家
00:32
can display radically different savings behavior?
4
16584
3249
其國民儲蓄的行為卻天差地遠？
00:35
Now, many brilliant economists have spent their entire lives working on this question,
5
19833
4534
許多才華洋溢的經濟學家
投入了畢生精力鑽研這個問題
投入了畢生精力鑽研這個問題
00:40
and as a field we've made a tremendous amount of headway
6
24367
3417
經濟學領域的人士在這方面
已取得極為豐碩的進展
已取得極為豐碩的進展
00:43
and we understand a lot about this.
7
27784
2433
對此問題頗有心得。
00:46
What I'm here to talk with you about today is an intriguing new hypothesis
8
30217
3634
今天我在這裡要跟大家說的
是個有趣的新假設
是個有趣的新假設
00:49
and some surprisingly powerful new findings that I've been working on
9
33851
4032
和一些經過我不斷研究後
所得出的強有力的新發現
所得出的強有力的新發現
00:53
about the link between the structure of the language you speak
10
37883
4706
那就是，人們的語言文法結構
00:58
and how you find yourself with the propensity to save.
11
42604
4396
與人們的儲蓄傾向之間的關聯。
01:02
Let me tell you a little bit about savings rates, a little bit about language,
12
47000
3067
讓我來簡要談談關儲蓄率以及語言
01:05
and then I'll draw that connection.
13
50067
2350
然後我會點出兩者間的關聯。
01:08
Let's start by thinking about the member countries of the OECD,
14
52417
4567
首先讓我們想想經合組織 (OECD) 的成員國
01:12
or the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development.
15
56984
3301
全名是經濟合作與發展組織。
01:16
OECD countries, by and large, you should think about these
16
60285
3899
經合組織的會員國，
基本上，你們可以把他們當作
基本上，你們可以把他們當作
01:20
as the richest, most industrialized countries in the world.
17
64184
2638
世上最富有，工業化程度最高的國家。
01:22
And by joining the OECD, they were affirming a common commitment
18
66822
4050
選擇加入經合組織時，
他們做出了一個共同的承諾
他們做出了一個共同的承諾
01:26
to democracy, open markets and free trade.
19
70872
3438
即支持民主、 公開市場和自由貿易。
01:30
Despite all of these similarities, we see huge differences in savings behavior.
20
74310
4685
儘管有這麼多相似之處，
我們仍發現儲蓄行為有極大的差異。
我們仍發現儲蓄行為有極大的差異。
01:34
So all the way over on the left of this graph,
21
78995
2450
這張圖表由右向左一路上升
01:37
what you see is many OECD countries saving over a quarter of their GDP every year,
22
81445
4734
你們可以看到，許多經合組織會員國的存款
都超過該國年度 GDP 的 25%
都超過該國年度 GDP 的 25%
01:42
and some OECD countries saving over a third of their GDP per year.
23
86179
4681
有些經合組織會員國的存款
甚至超過其年度 GDP 的三分之一。
甚至超過其年度 GDP 的三分之一。
01:46
Holding down the right flank of the OECD, all the way on the other side, is Greece.
24
90860
4768
而把右半邊的經合組織會員國往下拉的，就是希臘。
01:51
And what you can see is that over the last 25 years,
25
95628
3416
你們可以看到，過去 25 年來，
01:54
Greece has barely managed to save more than 10 percent of their GDP.
26
99044
3900
希臘的存款勉強超過該國 GDP 的一成。
01:58
It should be noted, of course, that the United States and the U.K. are the next in line.
27
102944
6874
當然，值得注意的是，英國和美國緊接在旁。
02:05
Now that we see these huge differences in savings rates,
28
109818
2578
現在我們看到了這些差異極大的儲蓄率
02:08
how is it possible that language might have something to do with these differences?
29
112396
3666
這些差異怎麼可能是語言造成的呢？
02:11
Let me tell you a little bit about how languages fundamentally differ.
30
116062
3049
讓我來簡要說說語言之間在根本上的差異。
02:15
Linguists and cognitive scientists have been exploring this question for many years now.
31
119111
5567
多年來，語言學家和認知科學家
一直在探討這個問題。
一直在探討這個問題。
02:20
And then I'll draw the connection between these two behaviors.
32
124678
4610
然後我會點出這兩種行為之間的關係。
02:25
Many of you have probably already noticed that I'm Chinese.
33
129288
2608
你們很多人可能已經注意到了，我是中國人。
02:27
I grew up in the Midwest of the United States.
34
131896
2965
我在美國的中西部長大。
02:30
And something I realized quite early on
35
134861
2451
很早以前我就發現一件事
02:33
was that the Chinese language forced me to speak about and --
36
137312
3591
那就是說中文的時候我不得不提到......
02:36
in fact, more fundamentally than that --
37
140903
2891
事實上，不光是提到......
02:39
ever so slightly forced me to think about family in very different ways.
38
143794
4090
說中文讓我必須從完全不同的角度
來思考家庭這個概念。
來思考家庭這個概念。
02:43
Now, how might that be? Let me give you an example.
39
147884
2077
那是甚麼意思呢？我舉個例子給你們聽。
02:45
Suppose I were talking with you and I was introducing you to my uncle.
40
149961
4402
假設我在跟你說話，
然後我介紹我 uncle 給你認識。
然後我介紹我 uncle 給你認識。
02:50
You understood exactly what I just said in English.
41
154363
2866
我用英文說，你絕對聽得懂。
02:53
If we were speaking Mandarin Chinese with each other, though,
42
157229
2950
如果說，我們倆講的是普通話，
02:56
I wouldn't have that luxury.
43
160179
2066
事情可就沒那麼好解決了。
02:58
I wouldn't have been able to convey so little information.
44
162245
2833
我所要傳遞的信息將大大增加。
03:00
What my language would have forced me to do,
45
165078
2384
我的語言將迫使我
03:03
instead of just telling you, "This is my uncle,"
46
167462
2000
不能只是告訴你 "這是我的 uncle"
03:05
is to tell you a tremendous amount of additional information.
47
169462
3282
是要告訴你大量的額外資訊。
03:08
My language would force me to tell you
48
172744
1819
我的語言迫使我告訴你
03:10
whether or not this was an uncle on my mother's side or my father's side,
49
174563
3416
他是我母親那邊的
還是我父親那一邊的 uncle，
還是我父親那一邊的 uncle，
03:13
whether this was an uncle by marriage or by birth,
50
177979
3084
這位 uncle 是我血親或是姻親，
03:16
and if this man was my father's brother,
51
181063
2232
如果這個人是我父親的兄弟，
03:19
whether he was older than or younger than my father.
52
183295
2784
他比我父親年長或是年輕。
03:21
All of this information is obligatory. Chinese doesn't let me ignore it.
53
186079
4133
所有這些資訊是強迫附帶的。
我說中文時無法忽略。
我說中文時無法忽略。
03:26
And in fact, if I want to speak correctly,
54
190212
2166
事實上，如果我想說得準確，
03:28
Chinese forces me to constantly think about it.
55
192378
3117
中文讓我必須不斷地思索這些關係。
03:31
Now, that fascinated me endlessly as a child,
56
195495
3949
我小時候對這些著迷得不得了，
03:35
but what fascinates me even more today as an economist
57
199444
3235
但是今天讓我這個經濟學家更著迷的，
03:38
is that some of these same differences carry through to how languages speak about time.
58
202679
5301
是這些同類型的差異
如何影響到語言對時間的描述。
如何影響到語言對時間的描述。
03:43
So for example, if I'm speaking in English, I have to speak grammatically differently
59
207980
4249
例如，如果我說英語，
我必須用文法說出其中差異
我必須用文法說出其中差異
03:48
if I'm talking about past rain, "It rained yesterday,"
60
212229
2733
如果我談論的是下過的雨："It rained yesterday,"
03:50
current rain, "It is raining now,"
61
214962
2232
正在下的雨："It is raining now,"
03:53
or future rain, "It will rain tomorrow."
62
217194
2434
或是未來的雨："It will rain tomorrow."。
03:55
Notice that English requires a lot more information with respect to the timing of events.
63
219628
4827
請注意，英語需要更多的訊息來描述時間因素。
04:00
Why? Because I have to consider that
64
224455
2007
為什麼？因為我要考慮時間
04:02
and I have to modify what I'm saying to say, "It will rain," or "It's going to rain."
65
226462
4783
然後我要修正我想說的 ：
"It will rain," 或是 "It's going to rain."
"It will rain," 或是 "It's going to rain."
04:07
It's simply not permissible in English to say, "It rain tomorrow."
66
231245
4116
英語就是不允許你說 ："It rain tomorrow."
04:11
In contrast to that, that's almost exactly what you would say in Chinese.
67
235361
4184
相反地，這差不多就是我們說中文的方式
04:15
A Chinese speaker can basically say something
68
239545
2316
基本上，以中文為母語的人說出來的話
04:17
that sounds very strange to an English speaker's ears.
69
241861
2584
在以英文為母語的人聽來會很奇怪。
04:20
They can say, "Yesterday it rain," "Now it rain," "Tomorrow it rain."
70
244445
4567
他們會說："Yesterday it rain,"
"Now it rain" "Tomorrow it rain."
"Now it rain" "Tomorrow it rain."
04:24
In some deep sense, Chinese doesn't divide up the time spectrum
71
249012
3863
深究此點，我們發現
中國人不會將時間分割開來，
中國人不會將時間分割開來，
04:28
in the same way that English forces us to constantly do in order to speak correctly.
72
252875
6433
而我們為了說出正確的英文，
卻必須不斷地提醒自己這點。
卻必須不斷地提醒自己這點。
04:35
Is this difference in languages
73
259308
1584
語言之間的這種差異
04:36
only between very, very distantly related languages, like English and Chinese?
74
260892
4195
只存在於關係極為疏遠的語系之間，
像是英文和中文嗎？
像是英文和中文嗎？
04:40
Actually, no.
75
265087
958
其實不是。
04:41
So many of you know, in this room, that English is a Germanic language.
76
266045
3733
現場的各位中很多人都知道了，
英語屬於日爾曼語族。
英語屬於日爾曼語族。
04:45
What you may not have realized is that English is actually an outlier.
77
269778
3915
而你們可能不知道，
其實英語是不合群份子。
其實英語是不合群份子。
04:49
It is the only Germanic language that requires this.
78
273693
3250
英語是日爾曼語族中唯一需要時態的。
04:52
For example, most other Germanic language speakers
79
276943
2884
舉例來說，大多數其他的日爾曼語族使用者
04:55
feel completely comfortable talking about rain tomorrow
80
279827
3017
聊到明天的天氣，他們會自然而然地說
04:58
by saying, "Morgen regnet es,"
81
282844
1966
"Morgen regnet es，" (德語)
05:00
quite literally to an English ear, "It rain tomorrow."
82
284810
3900
翻成英文後，聽在他們耳裡成了："It rain tomorrow."
05:04
This led me, as a behavioral economist, to an intriguing hypothesis.
83
288710
5067
這讓我這個行為經濟學家有了靈感，
提出了一個有趣的假說。
提出了一個有趣的假說。
05:09
Could how you speak about time, could how your language forces you to think about time,
84
293777
4249
人們談論時間的方式，
人們說母語時必須考慮的時態，
人們說母語時必須考慮的時態，
05:13
affect your propensity to behave across time?
85
298026
3751
會影響自己長期的行為傾向嗎？
05:17
You speak English, a futured language.
86
301777
2900
你們說的是英語，有未來式的語言。
05:20
And what that means is that every time you discuss the future,
87
304677
3167
這表示，每次你們在討論未來，
05:23
or any kind of a future event,
88
307844
1567
或是任何尚未發生的事件，
05:25
grammatically you're forced to cleave that from the present
89
309411
3399
文法的限制使你們必須區分現在和未來，
05:28
and treat it as if it's something viscerally different.
90
312810
2633
並確信這兩者在本質上有所不同。
05:31
Now suppose that that visceral difference
91
315443
2500
假設這種本質上的不同
05:33
makes you subtly dissociate the future from the present every time you speak.
92
317943
4200
讓你們每次說話時
都能敏銳地分割現在和未來。
都能敏銳地分割現在和未來。
05:38
If that's true and it makes the future feel
93
322143
1913
如果這點成立，那麼你們心中的未來
05:39
like something more distant and more different from the present,
94
324056
2983
會是遙遠的，不同於現在的一個概念，
05:42
that's going to make it harder to save.
95
327039
2654
這種心態會讓人不想存錢。
05:45
If, on the other hand, you speak a futureless language,
96
329693
2551
如果，相對來說，
你們講的是沒有未來式的語言，
你們講的是沒有未來式的語言，
05:48
the present and the future, you speak about them identically.
97
332244
3383
對於現在和未來，你們的說法完全相同。
05:51
If that subtly nudges you to feel about them identically,
98
335627
2983
如果這種微妙的傾向，
讓你們對現在與未來一視同仁
讓你們對現在與未來一視同仁
05:54
that's going to make it easier to save.
99
338610
2384
這種心態讓人想要存錢。
05:56
Now this is a fanciful theory.
100
340994
2550
這是一個天馬行空的理論。
05:59
I'm a professor, I get paid to have fanciful theories.
101
343544
2900
我是個教授，有人付錢
請我提出天馬行空的理論。
請我提出天馬行空的理論。
06:02
But how would you actually go about testing such a theory?
102
346444
4234
但要這種理論要如何實際測試？
06:06
Well, what I did with that was to access the linguistics literature.
103
350678
4066
各位，我的做法是查閱語言學文獻。
06:10
And interestingly enough, there are pockets of futureless language speakers
104
354744
4383
很有趣的是，語言裡沒有未來式的族群為數不少，
06:15
situated all over the world.
105
359127
1933
他們遍佈世界各地。
06:16
This is a pocket of futureless language speakers in Northern Europe.
106
361060
3366
這是一些為主歐洲北部的
沒有未來式的少數族群。
沒有未來式的少數族群。
06:20
Interestingly enough, when you start to crank the data,
107
364426
2901
很有趣的是，我開始分析資料時發現，
06:23
these pockets of futureless language speakers all around the world
108
367327
3233
這些遍佈世界的，不講未來式的少數族群
06:26
turn out to be, by and large, some of the world's best savers.
109
370560
3934
其實是，廣義來說，世界上最會存錢的人。
06:30
Just to give you a hint of that,
110
374494
2166
就做一個簡單的演示，
06:32
let's look back at that OECD graph that we were talking about.
111
376660
2750
我們回頭看看剛才我們
在談論的經合組織儲蓄圖。
在談論的經合組織儲蓄圖。
06:35
What you see is that these bars are systematically taller
112
379410
3384
你們會發現這幾個國家的數值
06:38
and systematically shifted to the left
113
382794
2132
平均偏高，多半在圖表的左邊
06:40
compared to these bars which are the members of the OECD that speak futured languages.
114
384926
4518
與那些文法有未來式的經合組織成員相比。
06:45
What is the average difference here?
115
389444
1463
這張圖的平均值差異是多少？
06:46
Five percentage points of your GDP saved per year.
116
390907
3286
每年拿該國 GDP 的百分之五來做儲蓄。
06:50
Over 25 years that has huge long-run effects on the wealth of your nation.
117
394193
4734
25 年后，這將對本國金融有長遠而重要的影響。
06:54
Now while these findings are suggestive,
118
398927
2700
雖然這些數據能作此解讀
06:57
countries can be different in so many different ways
119
401627
2066
國與國之間會有各種不同的差異
06:59
that it's very, very difficult sometimes to account for all of these possible differences.
120
403693
4384
有時候，要解釋所有這些
可能的差異是極為常困難的事。
可能的差異是極為常困難的事。
07:03
What I'm going to show you, though, is something that I've been engaging in for a year,
121
408077
4032
然而我等一下要提供的，
是這一年來我埋頭研究的東西
是這一年來我埋頭研究的東西
07:08
which is trying to gather all of the largest datasets
122
412109
2323
藉由經濟學家身分之便，我收集了那些...
07:10
that we have access to as economists,
123
414432
2292
極為龐大的資料集，並試圖將之彙整
07:12
and I'm going to try and strip away all of those possible differences,
124
416724
3382
然後我試圖剔除所有那些可能的差異，
07:16
hoping to get this relationship to break.
125
420106
2654
希望發現這兩種關係之間的盲點。
07:18
And just in summary, no matter how far I push this, I can't get it to break.
126
422760
5031
總而言之，不管我做了多少推論，還是沒有突破。
07:23
Let me show you how far you can do that.
127
427791
1765
讓我向你們展示一下
研究可以達到甚麼程度。
研究可以達到甚麼程度。
07:25
One way to imagine that is I gather large datasets from around the world.
128
429556
4633
你們可以想像一下，
我收集了世界各地的龐大資料集。
我收集了世界各地的龐大資料集。
07:30
So for example, there is the Survey of Health, [Aging] and Retirement in Europe.
129
434189
3734
例如說，歐洲的健康和 [老化] 退休人口的調查。
07:33
From this dataset you actually learn that retired European families
130
437923
3834
這個資料集會讓你們瞭解，歐洲的退休家庭
07:37
are extremely patient with survey takers.
131
441757
2633
真的對調查者都極有耐心。
07:40
(Laughter)
132
444390
1916
（笑聲）
07:42
So imagine that you're a retired household in Belgium and someone comes to your front door.
133
446306
4384
想像一下，你是退休的比利時人，
然後你家門口來了個訪客。
然後你家門口來了個訪客。
07:46
"Excuse me, would you mind if I peruse your stock portfolio?
134
450690
4584
"不好意思，請問可以讓我
細讀您的股票投資組合嗎？
細讀您的股票投資組合嗎？
07:51
Do you happen to know how much your house is worth? Do you mind telling me?
135
455274
3532
您是否知道這間房子的價格呢？可以告訴我嗎？
07:54
Would you happen to have a hallway that's more than 10 meters long?
136
458806
3267
您府上走廊的長度該不會剛好超過 10 米吧？
07:57
If you do, would you mind if I timed how long it took you to walk down that hallway?
137
462073
4501
如果是的話，可以讓我計算
您通過走廊要花多少時間嗎？
您通過走廊要花多少時間嗎？
08:02
Would you mind squeezing as hard as you can, in your dominant hand, this device
138
466574
3897
可以請您盡量大力握，
用您的慣用手，握這個設備，
用您的慣用手，握這個設備，
08:06
so I can measure your grip strength?
139
470471
1512
好讓我測量您的握力嗎？
08:07
How about blowing into this tube so I can measure your lung capacity?"
140
471983
4023
可以吹這根管子讓我測量您的肺容量嗎？"
08:11
The survey takes over a day.
141
476006
2884
這項調查費時一天以上。
08:14
(Laughter)
142
478890
1483
（笑聲）
08:16
Combine that with a Demographic and Health Survey
143
480373
3900
結合這些數據與其他調查，例如說......
08:20
collected by USAID in developing countries in Africa, for example,
144
484273
4450
美國國際開發署在非洲的
發展中國家蒐集的數據
發展中國家蒐集的數據
08:24
which that survey actually can go so far as to directly measure the HIV status
145
488723
5151
這個調查連愛滋病毒感染狀況
的數據都可以直接呈現
的數據都可以直接呈現
08:29
of families living in, for example, rural Nigeria.
146
493874
3099
針對的是......比方說，奈及利亞的農家成員。
08:32
Combine that with a world value survey,
147
496973
1901
把這些數據與世界範圍內的調查相結合，
08:34
which measures the political opinions and, fortunately for me, the savings behaviors
148
498874
4433
也就是政治傾向......以及算我好運......儲蓄行為的調查
08:39
of millions of families in hundreds of countries around the world.
149
503307
4699
針對全世界數百個國家的數百萬家庭。
08:43
Take all of that data, combine it, and this map is what you get.
150
508006
3818
取得所有資料、將之整合，最後得到這張圖。
08:47
What you find is nine countries around the world
151
511824
2250
你們會發現，全世界有九個國家
08:49
that have significant native populations
152
514074
2652
他們有大量的原住民人口
08:52
which speak both futureless and futured languages.
153
516726
4047
有的說未來式，有的不說未來式。
08:56
And what I'm going to do is form statistical matched pairs
154
520773
3534
而我的做法是，用統計學將其配對，
09:00
between families that are nearly identical on every dimension that I can measure,
155
524307
5593
我盡可能地考慮各個層面，
並撮合所有條件幾乎相同的家庭，
並撮合所有條件幾乎相同的家庭，
09:05
and then I'm going to explore whether or not the link between language and savings holds
156
529900
3537
接著我會大膽推測，
語言和儲蓄之間的聯繫是否存在，
語言和儲蓄之間的聯繫是否存在，
09:09
even after controlling for all of these levels.
157
533437
3483
連所有這些因素都考量進去的情況下。
09:12
What are the characteristics we can control for?
158
536920
2217
我們能控制哪些特質因素？
09:15
Well I'm going to match families on country of birth and residence,
159
539137
2764
我要以出生國和居住國為撮合因素，
09:17
the demographics -- what sex, their age --
160
541901
2402
還有人口統計學 -- 他們的性別，年紀，
09:20
their income level within their own country,
161
544303
2134
他們與本國居民相比的收入水準，
09:22
their educational achievement, a lot about their family structure.
162
546437
3015
他們的教育成就，家庭結構的細節。
09:25
It turns out there are six different ways to be married in Europe.
163
549452
3518
結果發現，歐洲有六種不同的結婚方式。
09:28
And most granularly, I break them down by religion
164
552970
4200
我用宗教做為劃分依據，
可說是鉅細靡遺，
可說是鉅細靡遺，
09:33
where there are 72 categories of religions in the world --
165
557170
3315
全世界有七十二種宗教派別，
09:36
so an extreme level of granularity.
166
560485
1717
因此區別程度極為精細。
09:38
There are 1.4 billion different ways that a family can find itself.
167
562202
4533
單個家庭會有十四億種區分標準。
09:42
Now effectively everything I'm going to tell you from now on
168
566735
4049
現在開始，所有我要告訴你們的，
09:46
is only comparing these basically nearly identical families.
169
570784
3050
其實只有比較這些大致相類似的家庭。
09:49
It's getting as close as possible to the thought experiment
170
573834
2500
我盡可能地讓腦中的想法付諸實驗，
09:52
of finding two families both of whom live in Brussels
171
576334
2933
我找到兩個家庭成員，都住在布魯塞爾，
09:55
who are identical on every single one of these dimensions,
172
579267
3000
他們每方面的條件都相似，
09:58
but one of whom speaks Flemish and one of whom speaks French;
173
582267
3116
但是一個家庭說佛蘭芒语，另一個說法語；
10:01
or two families that live in a rural district in Nigeria,
174
585383
2717
又或是奈及利亞郊區的兩個家庭，
10:04
one of whom speaks Hausa and one of whom speaks Igbo.
175
588100
3833
其中一個說豪撒語，另一個說伊博語。
10:07
Now even after all of this granular level of control,
176
591933
3884
現在連控制變因都做到如此細緻了，
10:11
do futureless language speakers seem to save more?
177
595817
3166
不說外來式的人存的錢比較多嗎？
10:14
Yes, futureless language speakers, even after this level of control,
178
598983
3653
沒錯，不說未來式的人，
即便控制變因已如此細緻
即便控制變因已如此細緻
10:18
are 30 percent more likely to report having saved in any given year.
179
602636
3698
他們在任何一年內都有
多三成的可能性進行儲蓄。
多三成的可能性進行儲蓄。
10:22
Does this have cumulative effects?
180
606334
1816
這會有累積效應嗎？
10:24
Yes, by the time they retire, futureless language speakers, holding constant their income,
181
608150
4420
沒錯，等到退休時，
這些收入穩定，不說未來式的人，
這些收入穩定，不說未來式的人，
10:28
are going to retire with 25 percent more in savings.
182
612570
3068
退休時的儲蓄還會再多四分之一。
10:31
Can we push this data even further?
183
615638
2481
我們能用這些資料進一步假設嗎？
10:34
Yes, because I just told you, we actually collect a lot of health data as economists.
184
618119
5299
可以，因為我說了，事實上
我們經濟學家收集了很多健康資訊。
我們經濟學家收集了很多健康資訊。
10:39
Now how can we think about health behaviors to think about savings?
185
623418
3883
為什麼我們能從健康習慣聯想到儲蓄呢？
10:43
Well, think about smoking, for example.
186
627301
2833
舉個例子，你們想想抽菸。
10:46
Smoking is in some deep sense negative savings.
187
630134
3183
仔細思考後會發現抽菸是負面的儲蓄。
10:49
If savings is current pain in exchange for future pleasure,
188
633317
3666
如果說儲蓄是用當下的痛苦換取未來的愉悅，
10:52
smoking is just the opposite.
189
636983
1308
抽菸則是相反情況。
10:54
It's current pleasure in exchange for future pain.
190
638291
2859
抽菸是用當下的愉悅換取未來的痛苦。
10:57
What we should expect then is the opposite effect.
191
641150
2950
而到頭來我們期待的會是另外一種結果。
11:00
And that's exactly what we find.
192
644100
1768
事實上，這就是我們的發現。
11:01
Futureless language speakers are 20 to 24 percent less likely
193
645868
3767
與其他條件幾乎相同的家庭比較，
11:05
to be smoking at any given point in time compared to identical families,
194
649635
3415
不說未來式的人，任何時間點的
抽菸可能性大約低了 20-24%。
抽菸可能性大約低了 20-24%。
11:08
and they're going to be 13 to 17 percent less likely
195
653050
2901
他們退休時的肥胖可能性
11:11
to be obese by the time they retire,
196
655951
2217
大約少了13-17%，
11:14
and they're going to report being 21 percent more likely
197
658168
2463
根據報告，在上一次性行為時使用了保險套
11:16
to have used a condom in their last sexual encounter.
198
660631
2287
的可能性要多21%。
11:18
I could go on and on with the list of differences that you can find.
199
662918
3483
我可以一項項地列舉這些差異。
11:22
It's almost impossible not to find a savings behavior
200
666401
3800
幾乎很難找到一種儲蓄習慣......
11:26
for which this strong effect isn't present.
201
670201
2599
不受這種強而有力的效應影響。
11:28
My linguistics and economics colleagues at Yale and I are just starting to do this work
202
672800
4750
我和我在耶魯的語言學和
經濟學同事們，正開始進行這研究，
經濟學同事們，正開始進行這研究，
11:33
and really explore and understand the ways that these subtle nudges
203
677550
5167
我們真的發現了
並理解這種微妙的推力
並理解這種微妙的推力
11:38
cause us to think more or less about the future every single time we speak.
204
682717
5395
或多或少讓我們每次
講到未來時都會稍加思考。
講到未來時都會稍加思考。
11:44
Ultimately, the goal,
205
688112
2301
最後，我們的目標是，
11:46
once we understand how these subtle effects can change our decision making,
206
690413
4199
一旦我們了解這些微妙的推力
如何影響我們的決策，
如何影響我們的決策，
11:50
we want to be able to provide people tools
207
694612
2950
我們想要提供人們一些方法，
11:53
so that they can consciously make themselves better savers
208
697562
2808
如此一來，他們就能自覺地改善儲蓄習慣，
11:56
and more conscious investors in their own future.
209
700370
3259
也能更自覺地投資自己的未來。
11:59
Thank you very much.
210
703629
2267
非常謝謝大家。
12:01
(Applause)
211
705896
6368
(掌聲)
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Keith Chen - Behavioral economistKeith Chen's research suggests that the language you speak may impact the way you think about your future.
Why you should listen
Does the future look like a different world to you, or more like an extension of the present? In an intriguing piece of research, Keith Chen suggests that your attitude about the future has a strong relationship to the language you speak. In a nutshell, some languages refer to the future using verb helpers like "will" and "shall," while others don't have specific verbs to refer to future actions. Chen correlated these two different language types with remarkably different rates of saving for the future (guess who saves more?). He calls this connection the "futurity" of languages. The paper is in the process of being published by the American Economic Review, and it's already generated discussion. Chen says: "While the data I analyze don’t allow me to completely understand what role language plays in these relationships, they suggest that there is something really remarkable to be explained about the interaction of language and economic decision-making. These correlations are so strong and survive such an aggressive set of controls, that the chances they arise by random lies somewhere between one in 10,000 and one in 10^32."
Chen excels in asking unusual questions to yield original results. Another work (with Yale colleague and TEDGlobal 2009 speaker Laurie Santos) examined how monkeys view economic risk--with surprisingly humanlike irrationality. While a working paper asks a surprising, if rhetorical, question: Does it make economic sense for a woman to become a physician?
Chen is currently Uber's Head of Economic Research and is an associate professor of economics at UCLA .
Keith Chen | Speaker | TED.com