TEDWomen 2010
Lauren Zalaznick: The conscience of television
Filmed:
Readability: 4.3
788,675 views
TV executive Lauren Zalaznick thinks deeply about pop television. Sharing results of a bold study that tracks attitudes against TV ratings over five decades, she makes a case that television reflects who we truly are -- in ways we might not have expected.
Lauren Zalaznick - Media executive
After wholly revamping the Bravo Network, media trendsetter Lauren Zalaznick is inventing fresh ways for NBC Universal to reach coveted new audiences across multiple media. Full bio
After wholly revamping the Bravo Network, media trendsetter Lauren Zalaznick is inventing fresh ways for NBC Universal to reach coveted new audiences across multiple media. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:15
I want to say that really and truly,
0
0
2000
00:17
after these incredible speeches
1
2000
2000
00:19
and ideas that are being spread,
2
4000
2000
00:21
I am in the awkward position
3
6000
2000
00:23
of being here to talk to you today
4
8000
2000
00:25
about television.
5
10000
3000
00:28
So most everyone watches TV.
6
13000
2000
00:30
We like it. We like some parts of it.
7
15000
3000
00:33
Here in America, people actually love TV.
8
18000
3000
00:36
The average American watches TV
9
21000
3000
00:39
for almost 5 hours a day.
10
24000
3000
00:42
Okay?
11
27000
2000
00:44
Now I happen to make my living these days in television,
12
29000
3000
00:47
so for me, that's a good thing.
13
32000
2000
00:49
But a lot of people don't love it so much.
14
34000
3000
00:52
They, in fact, berate it.
15
37000
2000
00:54
They call it stupid,
16
39000
2000
00:56
and worse, believe me.
17
41000
2000
00:58
My mother, growing up,
18
43000
2000
01:00
she called it the "idiot box."
19
45000
2000
01:02
But my idea today is not to debate
20
47000
2000
01:04
whether there's such a thing as good TV or bad TV;
21
49000
3000
01:07
my idea today
22
52000
2000
01:09
is to tell you that I believe
23
54000
2000
01:11
television has a conscience.
24
56000
3000
01:14
So why I believe that television has a conscience
25
59000
3000
01:17
is that I actually believe
26
62000
2000
01:19
that television directly reflects
27
64000
3000
01:22
the moral, political,
28
67000
2000
01:24
social and emotional need states of our nation --
29
69000
3000
01:27
that television is how we actually disseminate
30
72000
3000
01:30
our entire value system.
31
75000
2000
01:32
So all these things are uniquely human,
32
77000
3000
01:35
and they all add up
33
80000
2000
01:37
to our idea of conscience.
34
82000
2000
01:39
Now today, we're not talking about good and bad TV.
35
84000
2000
01:41
We're talking about popular TV.
36
86000
3000
01:44
We're talking about top-10 Nielsen-rated shows
37
89000
3000
01:47
over the course of 50 years.
38
92000
2000
01:49
How do these Nielsen ratings
39
94000
2000
01:51
reflect not just what you've heard about,
40
96000
3000
01:54
which is the idea of our social, collective unconscious,
41
99000
4000
01:58
but how do these top-10 Nielsen-rated shows
42
103000
2000
02:00
over 50 years
43
105000
2000
02:02
reflect the idea
44
107000
2000
02:04
of our social conscience?
45
109000
2000
02:06
How does television evolve over time,
46
111000
2000
02:08
and what does this say about our society?
47
113000
2000
02:10
Now speaking of evolution,
48
115000
2000
02:12
from basic biology, you probably remember
49
117000
3000
02:15
that the animal kingdom, including humans,
50
120000
3000
02:18
have four basic primal instincts.
51
123000
2000
02:20
You have hunger; you have sex; you have power;
52
125000
3000
02:23
and you have the urge for acquisitiveness.
53
128000
4000
02:27
As humans, what's important to remember
54
132000
2000
02:29
is that we've developed, we've evolved over time
55
134000
3000
02:32
to temper, or tame,
56
137000
2000
02:34
these basic animal instincts.
57
139000
3000
02:37
We have the capacity to laugh and cry.
58
142000
3000
02:40
We feel awe, we feel pity.
59
145000
2000
02:42
That is separate and apart
60
147000
2000
02:44
from the animal kingdom.
61
149000
2000
02:46
The other thing about human beings
62
151000
2000
02:48
is that we love to be entertained.
63
153000
3000
02:51
We love to watch TV.
64
156000
2000
02:53
This is something that clearly separates us
65
158000
2000
02:55
from the animal kingdom.
66
160000
2000
02:57
Animals might love to play,
67
162000
2000
02:59
but they don't love to watch.
68
164000
3000
03:02
So I had an ambition
69
167000
2000
03:04
to discover what could be understood
70
169000
2000
03:06
from this uniquely human relationship
71
171000
2000
03:08
between television programs
72
173000
2000
03:10
and the human conscious.
73
175000
2000
03:12
Why has television entertainment evolved the way it has?
74
177000
3000
03:15
I kind of think of it
75
180000
2000
03:17
as this cartoon devil or angel
76
182000
2000
03:19
sitting on our shoulders.
77
184000
2000
03:21
Is television literally functioning
78
186000
2000
03:23
as our conscience,
79
188000
2000
03:25
tempting us and rewarding us at the same time?
80
190000
3000
03:28
So to begin to answer these questions,
81
193000
2000
03:30
we did a research study.
82
195000
2000
03:32
We went back 50 years
83
197000
2000
03:34
to the 1959/1960 television season.
84
199000
3000
03:37
We surveyed the top-20 Nielsen shows
85
202000
2000
03:39
every year for 50 years --
86
204000
2000
03:41
a thousand shows.
87
206000
2000
03:43
We talked to over 3,000 individuals --
88
208000
2000
03:45
almost 3,600 --
89
210000
2000
03:47
aged 18 to 70,
90
212000
2000
03:49
and we asked them how they felt emotionally.
91
214000
2000
03:51
How did you feel
92
216000
2000
03:53
watching every single one of these shows?
93
218000
3000
03:56
Did you feel a sense of moral ambiguity?
94
221000
2000
03:58
Did you feel outrage? Did you laugh?
95
223000
3000
04:01
What did this mean for you?
96
226000
2000
04:03
So to our global TED audiences,
97
228000
2000
04:05
I want to say that this was a U.S. sample.
98
230000
2000
04:07
But as you can see,
99
232000
2000
04:09
these emotional need states are truly universal.
100
234000
3000
04:12
And on a factual basis,
101
237000
2000
04:14
over 80 percent of the U.S.'s most popular shows
102
239000
3000
04:17
are exported around the world.
103
242000
2000
04:19
So I really hope our global audiences
104
244000
2000
04:21
can relate.
105
246000
2000
04:23
Two acknowledgments
106
248000
2000
04:25
before our first data slide:
107
250000
2000
04:27
For inspiring me
108
252000
2000
04:29
to even think about the idea of conscience
109
254000
3000
04:32
and the tricks that conscience can play on us on a daily basis,
110
257000
4000
04:36
I thank legendary rabbi, Jack Stern.
111
261000
4000
04:40
And for the way in which I'm going to present the data,
112
265000
3000
04:43
I want to thank TED community superstar Hans Rosling,
113
268000
3000
04:46
who you may have just seen.
114
271000
2000
04:48
Okay, here we go.
115
273000
2000
04:50
So here you see,
116
275000
2000
04:52
from 1960 to 2010,
117
277000
2000
04:54
the 50 years of our study.
118
279000
3000
04:57
Two things we're going to start with --
119
282000
2000
04:59
the inspiration state and the moral ambiguity state,
120
284000
3000
05:02
which, for this purpose,
121
287000
2000
05:04
we defined inspiration
122
289000
2000
05:06
as television shows that uplift me,
123
291000
2000
05:08
that make me feel much more positive about the world.
124
293000
3000
05:11
Moral ambiguity are televisions shows
125
296000
3000
05:14
in which I don't understand
126
299000
2000
05:16
the difference between right and wrong.
127
301000
3000
05:19
As we start, you see in 1960
128
304000
2000
05:21
inspiration is holding steady.
129
306000
2000
05:23
That's what we're watching TV for.
130
308000
2000
05:25
Moral ambiguity starts to climb.
131
310000
2000
05:27
Right at the end of the 60s,
132
312000
2000
05:29
moral ambiguity is going up,
133
314000
2000
05:31
inspiration is kind of on the wane.
134
316000
2000
05:33
Why?
135
318000
2000
05:35
The Cuban Missile Crisis, JFK is shot,
136
320000
2000
05:37
the Civil Rights movement,
137
322000
2000
05:39
race riots, the Vietnam War,
138
324000
2000
05:41
MLK is shot, Bobby Kennedy is shot,
139
326000
2000
05:43
Watergate.
140
328000
2000
05:45
Look what happens.
141
330000
2000
05:47
In 1970, inspiration plummets.
142
332000
2000
05:49
Moral ambiguity takes off.
143
334000
2000
05:51
They cross,
144
336000
2000
05:53
but Ronald Reagan, a telegenic president, is in office.
145
338000
2000
05:55
It's trying to recover.
146
340000
2000
05:57
But look, it can't:
147
342000
2000
05:59
AIDS, Iran-Contra,
148
344000
2000
06:01
the Challenger disaster, Chernobyl.
149
346000
2000
06:03
Moral ambiguity becomes the dominant meme in television
150
348000
4000
06:07
from 1990 for the next 20 years.
151
352000
2000
06:09
Take a look at this.
152
354000
2000
06:11
This chart is going to document a very similar trend.
153
356000
3000
06:14
But in this case, we have comfort -- the bubble in red --
154
359000
3000
06:17
social commentary and irreverence
155
362000
2000
06:19
in blue and green.
156
364000
3000
06:22
Now this time on TV
157
367000
2000
06:24
you have "Bonanza," don't forget, you have "Gunsmoke,"
158
369000
3000
06:27
you have "Andy Griffith,"
159
372000
2000
06:29
you have domestic shows all about comfort.
160
374000
3000
06:32
This is rising. Comfort stays whole.
161
377000
3000
06:35
Irreverence starts to rise.
162
380000
2000
06:37
Social commentary is all of a sudden spiking up.
163
382000
3000
06:40
You get to 1969, and look what happens.
164
385000
3000
06:43
You have comfort, irreverence, and social commentary,
165
388000
3000
06:46
not only battling it out in our society,
166
391000
3000
06:49
but you literally have two establishment shows --
167
394000
4000
06:53
"Gunsmoke" and "Gomer Pyle" --
168
398000
2000
06:55
in 1969 are the number-two- and number-three-rated television shows.
169
400000
3000
06:58
What's number one?
170
403000
2000
07:00
The socially irreverent hippie show,
171
405000
3000
07:03
"Rowan and Martin's Laugh-In."
172
408000
2000
07:05
They're all living together, right.
173
410000
2000
07:07
Viewers had responded dramatically.
174
412000
2000
07:09
Look at this green spike in 1966
175
414000
3000
07:12
to a bellwether show.
176
417000
2000
07:14
When you guys hear this industry term, a breakout hit,
177
419000
2000
07:16
what does that mean?
178
421000
2000
07:18
It means in the 1966 television season,
179
423000
3000
07:21
The "Smothers Brothers" came out of nowhere.
180
426000
4000
07:25
This was the first show
181
430000
2000
07:27
that allowed viewers to say,
182
432000
2000
07:29
"My God,
183
434000
2000
07:31
I can comment on how I feel about the Vietnam War,
184
436000
3000
07:34
about the presidency, through television?"
185
439000
2000
07:36
That's what we mean by a breakout show.
186
441000
3000
07:39
So then, just like the last chart, look what happens.
187
444000
3000
07:42
In 1970,
188
447000
2000
07:44
the dam bursts. The dam bursts.
189
449000
2000
07:46
Comfort is no longer why we watch television.
190
451000
3000
07:49
Social commentary and irreverence
191
454000
2000
07:51
rise throughout the 70s.
192
456000
2000
07:53
Now look at this.
193
458000
2000
07:55
The 70s means who? Norman Lear.
194
460000
3000
07:58
You have "All in the Family," "Sanford and Son,"
195
463000
2000
08:00
and the dominant show --
196
465000
2000
08:02
in the top-10 for the entire 70s --
197
467000
2000
08:04
"MAS*H."
198
469000
2000
08:06
In the entire 50 years
199
471000
2000
08:08
of television that we studied,
200
473000
3000
08:11
seven of 10 shows
201
476000
3000
08:14
ranked most highly for irreverence
202
479000
3000
08:17
appeared on air during the Vietnam War,
203
482000
2000
08:19
five of the top-10 during the Nixon administration.
204
484000
4000
08:23
Only one generation, 20 years in,
205
488000
3000
08:26
and we discovered,
206
491000
2000
08:28
Wow! TV can do that?
207
493000
3000
08:31
It can make me feel this?
208
496000
2000
08:33
It can change us?
209
498000
3000
08:36
So to this very, very savvy crowd,
210
501000
2000
08:38
I also want to note
211
503000
3000
08:41
the digital folks did not invent disruptive.
212
506000
3000
08:44
Archie Bunker was shoved out of his easy chair
213
509000
2000
08:46
along with the rest of us
214
511000
2000
08:48
40 years ago.
215
513000
2000
08:50
This is a quick chart. Here's another attribute:
216
515000
2000
08:52
fantasy and imagination,
217
517000
2000
08:54
which are shows defined as,
218
519000
2000
08:56
"takes me out of my everyday realm"
219
521000
3000
08:59
and "makes me feel better."
220
524000
2000
09:01
That's mapped against the red dot, unemployment,
221
526000
2000
09:03
which is a simple Bureau of Labor Department statistic.
222
528000
4000
09:07
You'll see
223
532000
2000
09:09
that every time fantasy and imagination shows rise,
224
534000
3000
09:12
it maps to a spike in unemployment.
225
537000
3000
09:15
Do we want to see shows
226
540000
2000
09:17
about people saving money and being unemployed?
227
542000
3000
09:20
No. In the 70s
228
545000
2000
09:22
you have the bellwether show "The Bionic Woman"
229
547000
3000
09:25
that rocketed into the top-10 in 1973,
230
550000
3000
09:28
followed by the "Six Million-Dollar Man" and "Charlie's Angels."
231
553000
3000
09:31
Another spike in the 1980s --
232
556000
3000
09:34
another spike in shows about control and power.
233
559000
4000
09:38
What were those shows?
234
563000
2000
09:40
Glamorous and rich.
235
565000
2000
09:42
"Dallas," "Fantasy Island."
236
567000
3000
09:45
Incredible mapping of our national psyche
237
570000
3000
09:48
with some hard and fast facts:
238
573000
2000
09:50
unemployment.
239
575000
3000
09:53
So here you are, in my favorite chart,
240
578000
3000
09:56
because this is our last 20 years.
241
581000
2000
09:58
Whether or not you're in my business,
242
583000
2000
10:00
you have surely heard or read
243
585000
3000
10:03
of the decline of the thing called the three-camera sitcom
244
588000
3000
10:06
and the rise of reality TV.
245
591000
4000
10:10
Well, as we say in the business,
246
595000
2000
10:12
X marks the spot.
247
597000
2000
10:14
The 90s -- the big bubbles of humor --
248
599000
2000
10:16
we're watching "Friends," "Frasier," "Cheers" and "Seinfeld."
249
601000
3000
10:19
Everything's good, low unemployment.
250
604000
3000
10:22
But look: X marks the spot.
251
607000
3000
10:25
In 2001,
252
610000
2000
10:27
the September 2001 television season,
253
612000
3000
10:30
humor succumbs to judgment once and for all.
254
615000
4000
10:34
Why not?
255
619000
2000
10:36
We had a 2000 presidential election
256
621000
2000
10:38
decided by the Supreme Court.
257
623000
2000
10:40
We had the bursting of the tech bubble.
258
625000
2000
10:42
We had 9/11.
259
627000
2000
10:44
Anthrax becomes part of the social lexicon.
260
629000
3000
10:47
Look what happens when we keep going.
261
632000
2000
10:49
At the turn of the century, the Internet takes off,
262
634000
3000
10:52
reality television has taken hold.
263
637000
3000
10:55
What do people want in their TV then?
264
640000
2000
10:57
I would have thought revenge
265
642000
3000
11:00
or nostalgia.
266
645000
2000
11:02
Give me some comfort; my world is falling apart.
267
647000
2000
11:04
No, they want judgment.
268
649000
2000
11:06
I can vote you off the island.
269
651000
2000
11:08
I can keep Sarah Palin's daughter dancing.
270
653000
3000
11:11
I can choose the next American Idol. You're fired.
271
656000
3000
11:14
That's all great, right?
272
659000
3000
11:17
So as dramatically different as these television shows,
273
662000
4000
11:21
pure entertainment, have been over the last 50 years --
274
666000
3000
11:24
what did I start with? --
275
669000
2000
11:26
one basic instinct remains.
276
671000
2000
11:28
We're animals, we need our moms.
277
673000
3000
11:31
There has not been a decade of television
278
676000
2000
11:33
without a definitive, dominant TV mom.
279
678000
4000
11:37
The 1950s:
280
682000
2000
11:39
June Cleever in the original comfort show, "Leave it to Beaver."
281
684000
3000
11:42
Lucille Ball kept us laughing
282
687000
3000
11:45
through the rise of social consciousness in the 60s.
283
690000
3000
11:48
Maude Findlay,
284
693000
2000
11:50
the epitome of the irreverent 1970s,
285
695000
3000
11:53
who tackled abortion, divorce,
286
698000
2000
11:55
even menopause on TV.
287
700000
2000
11:57
The 1980s,
288
702000
2000
11:59
our first cougar was given to us
289
704000
3000
12:02
in the form of Alexis Carrington.
290
707000
3000
12:05
Murphy Brown took on a vice president
291
710000
2000
12:07
when she took on the idea of single parenthood.
292
712000
5000
12:12
This era's mom,
293
717000
2000
12:14
Bree Van de Kamp.
294
719000
3000
12:17
Now I don't know if this is the devil or the angel
295
722000
3000
12:20
sitting on our conscience,
296
725000
2000
12:22
sitting on television's shoulders,
297
727000
2000
12:24
but I do know that I absolutely love this image.
298
729000
4000
12:29
So to you all,
299
734000
2000
12:31
the women of TEDWomen, the men of TEDWomen,
300
736000
2000
12:33
the global audiences of TEDWomen,
301
738000
3000
12:36
thank you for letting me present my idea
302
741000
2000
12:38
about the conscience of television.
303
743000
2000
12:40
But let me also thank the incredible creators
304
745000
3000
12:43
who get up everyday
305
748000
2000
12:45
to put their ideas on our television screens
306
750000
3000
12:48
throughout all these ages of television.
307
753000
2000
12:50
They give it life on television, for sure,
308
755000
3000
12:53
but it's you as viewers,
309
758000
2000
12:55
through your collective social consciences,
310
760000
3000
12:58
that give it life, longevity,
311
763000
2000
13:00
power or not.
312
765000
2000
13:02
So thanks very much.
313
767000
2000
13:04
(Applause)
314
769000
2000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Lauren Zalaznick - Media executiveAfter wholly revamping the Bravo Network, media trendsetter Lauren Zalaznick is inventing fresh ways for NBC Universal to reach coveted new audiences across multiple media.
Why you should listen
In her industry-famous overhaul of Bravo, Lauren Zalaznick took a marginal arts-centered network and made it the destination for trendy reality TV. Now the tastemaker who brought us shows like Project Runway, Top Chef and the Real Housewives franchise is applying her savvy to the challenge of creating a truly multimedia network. As chair of NBC Universal Entertainment & Digital Networks and Integrated Media, Zalaznick is using digital media to fuel the popularity of traditional media.
Before her career in television, Zalaznick produced several award-winning indie films, including Larry Clark’s iconic Kids and Jim McKay’s Girls Town. She broke into TV as a senior executive at music channel VH1, pioneering the low-budget, simple and cunning Pop-Up Video. Her sharp pop-culture sensibility has earned her a place among Time’s 100 Most Influential People, Vanity Fair’s New Establishment and Fortune’s 50 Most Powerful Women.
Lauren Zalaznick | Speaker | TED.com