TEDxMiamiUniversity
Timothy Bartik: The economic case for preschool
Filmed:
Readability: 5.2
441,472 views
In this well-argued talk, Timothy Bartik makes the macro-economic case for preschool education -- and explains why you should be happy to invest in it, even if you don't have kids that age (or kids at all). The economic benefits of well-educated kids, it turns out, go well beyond the altruistic.
Timothy Bartik - Economist
The author of "Investing in Kids," Timothy Bartik studies state and local economies -- and analyzes the benefits of preschool as an economic development program. Full bio
The author of "Investing in Kids," Timothy Bartik studies state and local economies -- and analyzes the benefits of preschool as an economic development program. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:13
In this talk today, I want to present a different idea
0
1286
4488
00:17
for why investing in early childhood education
1
5774
4221
00:21
makes sense as a public investment.
2
9995
2699
00:24
It's a different idea, because usually,
3
12694
2238
00:26
when people talk about early childhood programs,
4
14932
1373
00:28
they talk about all the wonderful benefits for participants
5
16305
3341
00:31
in terms of former participants, in preschool,
6
19646
3282
00:34
they have better K-12 test scores,
7
22928
2265
00:37
better adult earnings.
8
25193
2115
00:39
Now that's all very important,
9
27308
2115
00:41
but what I want to talk about is what preschool does
10
29423
4096
00:45
for state economies
11
33519
1822
00:47
and for promoting state economic development.
12
35341
3297
00:50
And that's actually crucial
13
38638
3293
00:53
because if we're going to get increased investment
14
41931
3324
00:57
in early childhood programs,
15
45255
2343
00:59
we need to interest state governments in this.
16
47598
3523
01:03
The federal government has a lot on its plate,
17
51121
2226
01:05
and state governments are going to have to step up.
18
53347
2498
01:07
So we have to appeal to them,
19
55845
2183
01:10
the legislators in the state government,
20
58028
2553
01:12
and turn to something they understand,
21
60581
1990
01:14
that they have to promote the economic development
22
62571
2298
01:16
of their state economy.
23
64869
1687
01:18
Now, by promoting economic development,
24
66556
1816
01:20
I don't mean anything magical.
25
68372
1714
01:22
All I mean is, is that early childhood education
26
70086
3463
01:25
can bring more and better jobs to a state
27
73549
3903
01:29
and can thereby promote higher per capita earnings
28
77452
3178
01:32
for the state's residents.
29
80630
1950
01:34
Now, I think it's fair to say that when people think about
30
82580
3993
01:38
state and local economic development,
31
86573
2004
01:40
they don't generally think first about what they're doing
32
88577
3782
01:44
about childcare and early childhood programs.
33
92359
2555
01:46
I know this. I've spent most of my career researching these programs.
34
94914
3903
01:50
I've talked to a lot of directors
35
98817
1623
01:52
of state economic development agencies about these issues,
36
100440
2328
01:54
a lot of legislators about these issues.
37
102768
2542
01:57
When legislators and others think about economic development,
38
105310
3059
02:00
what they first of all think about are business tax incentives,
39
108369
3256
02:03
property tax abatements, job creation tax credits,
40
111625
2878
02:06
you know, there are a million of these programs all over the place.
41
114503
2687
02:09
So for example, states compete very vigorously
42
117190
2606
02:11
to attract new auto plants or expanded auto plants.
43
119796
3665
02:15
They hand out all kinds of business tax breaks.
44
123461
2140
02:17
Now, those programs can make sense
45
125601
2198
02:19
if they in fact induce new location decisions,
46
127799
3002
02:22
and the way they can make sense is,
47
130801
1385
02:24
by creating more and better jobs,
48
132186
2313
02:26
they raise employment rates, raise per capita earnings of state residents.
49
134499
3583
02:30
So there is a benefit to state residents
50
138082
2070
02:32
that corresponds to the costs that they're paying
51
140152
2149
02:34
by paying for these business tax breaks.
52
142301
2273
02:36
My argument is essentially that early childhood programs
53
144574
3808
02:40
can do exactly the same thing,
54
148382
3725
02:44
create more and better jobs, but in a different way.
55
152107
3909
02:48
It's a somewhat more indirect way.
56
156016
2418
02:50
These programs can promote more and better jobs by,
57
158434
3646
02:54
you build it, you invest in high-quality preschool,
58
162080
2875
02:56
it develops the skills of your local workforce
59
164955
3818
03:00
if enough of them stick around, and, in turn,
60
168773
3743
03:04
that higher-quality local workforce
61
172516
2153
03:06
will be a key driver of creating jobs and creating
62
174669
4692
03:11
higher earnings per capita in the local community.
63
179361
2508
03:13
Now, let me turn to some numbers on this.
64
181869
2964
03:16
Okay. If you look at the research evidence --
65
184833
4583
03:21
that's extensive -- on how much early childhood programs
66
189416
4663
03:26
affect the educational attainment, wages and skills
67
194079
4597
03:30
of former participants in preschool as adults,
68
198676
3509
03:34
you take those known effects,
69
202185
2636
03:36
you take how many of those folks will be expected
70
204821
2688
03:39
to stick around the state or local economy and not move out,
71
207509
3701
03:43
and you take research on how much skills
72
211210
3820
03:47
drive job creation, you will conclude,
73
215030
3171
03:50
from these three separate lines of research,
74
218201
2043
03:52
that for every dollar invested in early childhood programs,
75
220244
4079
03:56
the per capita earnings of state residents
76
224323
3453
03:59
go up by two dollars and 78 cents,
77
227776
2766
04:02
so that's a three-to-one return.
78
230542
1867
04:04
Now you can get much higher returns,
79
232409
3033
04:07
of up to 16-to-one, if you include anti-crime benefits,
80
235442
4074
04:11
if you include benefits to former preschool participants
81
239516
4714
04:16
who move to some other state,
82
244230
2184
04:18
but there's a good reason for focusing on these three dollars
83
246414
3011
04:21
because this is salient and important
84
249425
2087
04:23
to state legislators and state policy makers,
85
251512
2290
04:25
and it's the states that are going to have to act.
86
253802
2144
04:27
So there is this key benefit that is relevant
87
255946
3299
04:31
to state policy makers in terms of economic development.
88
259245
3249
04:34
Now, one objection you often hear,
89
262494
3418
04:37
or maybe you don't hear it because people are too polite to say it, is,
90
265912
4897
04:42
why should I pay more taxes
91
270809
4463
04:47
to invest in other people's children?
92
275272
4278
04:51
What's in it for me?
93
279550
2494
04:54
And the trouble with that objection,
94
282044
2279
04:56
it reflects a total misunderstanding
95
284323
4002
05:00
of how much local economies
96
288325
3017
05:03
involve everyone being interdependent.
97
291342
3506
05:06
Specifically, the interdependency here is, is that
98
294848
3917
05:10
there are huge spillovers of skills --
99
298765
3533
05:14
that when other people's children get more skills,
100
302298
5320
05:19
that actually increases the prosperity of everyone,
101
307618
3769
05:23
including people whose skills don't change.
102
311387
3354
05:26
So for example, numerous research studies have shown
103
314741
2404
05:29
if you look at what really drives
104
317145
2579
05:31
the growth rate of metropolitan areas,
105
319724
2464
05:34
it's not so much low taxes, low cost, low wages;
106
322188
5670
05:39
it's the skills of the area. Particularly, the proxy for skills
107
327858
3623
05:43
that people use is percentage of college graduates in the area.
108
331481
3535
05:47
So when you look, for example, at metropolitan areas
109
335016
3079
05:50
such as the Boston area, Minneapolis-St. Paul,
110
338095
3513
05:53
Silicon Valley, these areas are not doing well economically
111
341608
5336
05:58
because they're low-cost.
112
346944
2309
06:01
I don't know if you ever tried to buy a house in Silicon Valley.
113
349253
1925
06:03
It's not exactly a low-cost proposition.
114
351178
2817
06:05
They are growing because they have high levels of skills.
115
353995
5945
06:11
So when we invest in other people's children,
116
359940
3155
06:15
and build up those skills, we increase the overall job growth
117
363095
4185
06:19
of a metro area.
118
367280
1521
06:20
As another example, if we look
119
368801
3888
06:24
at what determines an individual's wages,
120
372689
3235
06:27
and we do statistical exploration of that, what determines wages,
121
375924
4225
06:32
we know that the individual's wages will depend, in part,
122
380149
4523
06:36
on that individual's education,
123
384672
2431
06:39
for example whether or not they have a college degree.
124
387103
2993
06:42
One of the very interesting facts is that, in addition,
125
390096
3338
06:45
we find that even once we hold constant, statistically,
126
393434
4047
06:49
the effect of your own education,
127
397481
2904
06:52
the education of everyone else in your metropolitan area
128
400385
3200
06:55
also affects your wages.
129
403585
1972
06:57
So specifically, if you hold constant your education,
130
405557
4204
07:01
you stick in percentage of college graduates in your metro area,
131
409761
4103
07:05
you will find that has a significant positive effect on your wages
132
413864
3960
07:09
without changing your education at all.
133
417824
3470
07:13
In fact, this effect is so strong
134
421294
3151
07:16
that when someone gets a college degree,
135
424445
3813
07:20
the spillover effects of this on the wages
136
428258
2441
07:22
of others in the metropolitan area
137
430699
1893
07:24
are actually greater than the direct effects.
138
432592
3102
07:27
So if someone gets a college degree, their lifetime earnings
139
435694
3453
07:31
go up by a huge amount, over 700,000 dollars.
140
439147
3315
07:34
There's an effect on everyone else in the metro area
141
442462
2515
07:36
of driving up the percentage of college graduates in the metro area,
142
444977
3863
07:40
and if you add that up -- it's a small effect for each person,
143
448840
3416
07:44
but if you add that up across all the people in the metro area,
144
452256
3432
07:47
you actually get that the increase in wages for everyone else
145
455688
3626
07:51
in the metropolitan area adds up to almost a million dollars.
146
459314
2913
07:54
That's actually greater than the direct benefits
147
462227
2078
07:56
of the person choosing to get education.
148
464305
3054
07:59
Now, what's going on here?
149
467359
1359
08:00
What can explain these huge spillover effects of education?
150
468718
3923
08:04
Well, let's think about it this way.
151
472641
1474
08:06
I can be the most skilled person in the world,
152
474115
3323
08:09
but if everyone else at my firm lacks skills,
153
477438
3801
08:13
my employer is going to find it more difficult
154
481239
2969
08:16
to introduce new technology, new production techniques.
155
484208
4056
08:20
So as a result, my employer is going to be less productive.
156
488264
3602
08:23
They will not be able to afford to pay me as good wages.
157
491866
3601
08:27
Even if everyone at my firm has good skills,
158
495467
3681
08:31
if the workers at the suppliers to my firm
159
499148
3508
08:34
do not have good skills,
160
502656
1970
08:36
my firm is going to be less competitive
161
504626
2397
08:39
competing in national and international markets.
162
507023
2385
08:41
And again, the firm that's less competitive
163
509408
3094
08:44
will not be able to pay as good wages,
164
512502
2689
08:47
and then, particularly in high-tech businesses,
165
515191
4133
08:51
they're constantly stealing ideas and workers from other businesses.
166
519324
3261
08:54
So clearly the productivity of firms in Silicon Valley
167
522585
3220
08:57
has a lot to do with the skills not only of the workers at their firm,
168
525805
3795
09:01
but the workers at all the other firms in the metro area.
169
529600
4419
09:06
So as a result, if we can invest in other people's children
170
534019
3534
09:09
through preschool and other early childhood programs
171
537553
2402
09:11
that are high-quality, we not only help those children,
172
539955
3656
09:15
we help everyone in the metropolitan area
173
543611
3621
09:19
gain in wages and we'll have the metropolitan area
174
547232
3671
09:22
gain in job growth.
175
550903
2022
09:24
Another objection used sometimes here
176
552925
2531
09:27
to invest in early childhood programs
177
555456
2228
09:29
is concern about people moving out.
178
557684
3721
09:33
So, you know, maybe Ohio's thinking about investing
179
561405
4235
09:37
in more preschool education
180
565640
2244
09:39
for children in Columbus, Ohio,
181
567884
3810
09:43
but they're worried that these little Buckeyes will,
182
571694
2259
09:45
for some strange reason, decide to move to Ann Arbor, Michigan,
183
573953
2917
09:48
and become Wolverines.
184
576870
1517
09:50
And maybe Michigan will be thinking about investing
185
578387
3294
09:53
in preschool in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and be worried
186
581681
2441
09:56
these little Wolverines will end up moving to Ohio and becoming Buckeyes.
187
584122
3235
09:59
And so they'll both underinvest because everyone's going to move out.
188
587357
3992
10:03
Well, the reality is, if you look at the data,
189
591349
2941
10:06
Americans aren't as hyper-mobile as people sometimes assume.
190
594290
4213
10:10
The data is that over 60 percent of Americans
191
598503
5120
10:15
spend most of their working careers
192
603623
2438
10:18
in the state they were born in, over 60 percent.
193
606061
3770
10:21
That percentage does not vary much from state to state.
194
609831
4095
10:25
It doesn't vary much with the state's economy,
195
613926
3104
10:29
whether it's depressed or booming,
196
617030
1798
10:30
it doesn't vary much over time.
197
618828
2321
10:33
So the reality is, if you invest in kids,
198
621149
5813
10:38
they will stay.
199
626962
2499
10:41
Or at least, enough of them will stay
200
629461
3038
10:44
that it will pay off for your state economy.
201
632499
3421
10:47
Okay, so to sum up, there is a lot of research evidence
202
635920
3924
10:51
that early childhood programs, if run in a high-quality way,
203
639844
3154
10:54
pay off in higher adult skills.
204
642998
2856
10:57
There's a lot of research evidence
205
645854
1567
10:59
that those folks will stick around the state economy,
206
647421
3624
11:03
and there's a lot of evidence that having more workers
207
651045
3317
11:06
with higher skills in your local economy
208
654362
2090
11:08
pays off in higher wages and job growth for your local economy,
209
656452
3679
11:12
and if you calculate the numbers for each dollar,
210
660131
3443
11:15
we get about three dollars back
211
663574
2729
11:18
in benefits for the state economy.
212
666303
2175
11:20
So in my opinion, the research evidence is compelling
213
668478
3612
11:24
and the logic of this is compelling.
214
672090
2824
11:26
So what are the barriers to getting it done?
215
674914
3690
11:30
Well, one obvious barrier is cost.
216
678604
3264
11:33
So if you look at what it would cost
217
681868
4330
11:38
if every state government invested
218
686198
2827
11:41
in universal preschool at age four, full-day preschool at age four,
219
689025
4205
11:45
the total annual national cost would be roughly
220
693230
3415
11:48
30 billion dollars.
221
696645
2305
11:50
So, 30 billion dollars is a lot of money.
222
698950
2425
11:53
On the other hand, if you reflect on
223
701375
3745
11:57
that the U.S.'s population is over 300 million,
224
705120
3860
12:00
we're talking about an amount of money
225
708980
2683
12:03
that amounts to 100 dollars per capita.
226
711663
2620
12:06
Okay? A hundred dollars per capita, per person,
227
714283
2978
12:09
is something that any state government can afford to do.
228
717261
4005
12:13
It's just a simple matter of political will to do it.
229
721266
4749
12:18
And, of course, as I mentioned,
230
726015
1880
12:19
this cost has corresponding benefits.
231
727895
2154
12:22
I mentioned there's a multiplier of about three,
232
730049
2176
12:24
2.78, for the state economy,
233
732225
2100
12:26
in terms of over 80 billion in extra earnings.
234
734325
3029
12:29
And if we want to translate that from just billions of dollars
235
737354
3024
12:32
to something that might mean something,
236
740378
1893
12:34
what we're talking about is that, for the average low-income kid,
237
742271
3588
12:37
that would increase earnings by about 10 percent
238
745859
3117
12:40
over their whole career, just doing the preschool,
239
748976
3199
12:44
not improving K-12 or anything else after that,
240
752175
2515
12:46
not doing anything with college tuition or access,
241
754690
2548
12:49
just directly improving preschool,
242
757238
2696
12:51
and we would get five percent higher earnings
243
759934
2299
12:54
for middle-class kids.
244
762233
1396
12:55
So this is an investment
245
763629
2065
12:57
that pays off in very concrete terms
246
765694
2908
13:00
for a broad range of income groups in the state's population
247
768602
4420
13:05
and produces large and tangible benefits.
248
773022
4510
13:09
Now, that's one barrier.
249
777532
2554
13:12
I actually think the more profound barrier
250
780086
3422
13:15
is the long-term nature of the benefits from early childhood programs.
251
783508
4430
13:19
So the argument I'm making is, is that we're increasing
252
787938
2846
13:22
the quality of our local workforce,
253
790784
1755
13:24
and thereby increasing economic development.
254
792539
2666
13:27
Obviously if we have a preschool with four-year-olds,
255
795205
3380
13:30
we're not sending these kids out at age five
256
798585
2368
13:32
to work in the sweatshops, right? At least I hope not.
257
800953
3515
13:36
So we're talking about an investment
258
804468
3412
13:39
that in terms of impacts on the state economy
259
807880
2470
13:42
is not going to really pay off for 15 or 20 years,
260
810350
3961
13:46
and of course America is notorious for being
261
814311
2858
13:49
a short term-oriented society.
262
817169
3007
13:52
Now one response you can make to this,
263
820176
1660
13:53
and I sometimes have done this in talks,
264
821836
1525
13:55
is people can talk about, there are benefits for these programs
265
823361
3077
13:58
in reducing special ed and remedial education costs,
266
826438
3647
14:02
there are benefits, parents care about preschool,
267
830085
2306
14:04
maybe we'll get some migration effects
268
832391
2250
14:06
from parents seeking good preschool,
269
834641
2318
14:08
and I think those are true,
270
836959
1647
14:10
but in some sense they're missing the point.
271
838606
2162
14:12
Ultimately, this is something
272
840768
2571
14:15
we're investing in now for the future.
273
843339
3925
14:19
And so what I want to leave you with is
274
847264
3949
14:23
what I think is the ultimate question.
275
851213
2306
14:25
I mean, I'm an economist, but this is ultimately
276
853519
2834
14:28
not an economic question, it's a moral question:
277
856353
5545
14:33
Are we willing, as Americans,
278
861898
4207
14:38
are we as a society still capable
279
866105
3450
14:41
of making the political choice to sacrifice now
280
869555
4784
14:46
by paying more taxes
281
874339
2649
14:48
in order to improve the long-term future
282
876988
5205
14:54
of not only our kids, but our community?
283
882193
3417
14:57
Are we still capable of that as a country?
284
885610
4447
15:02
And that's something that each and every citizen
285
890057
2441
15:04
and voter needs to ask themselves.
286
892498
2543
15:07
Is that something that you are still invested in,
287
895041
2945
15:09
that you still believe in the notion of investment?
288
897986
2734
15:12
That is the notion of investment.
289
900720
1399
15:14
You sacrifice now for a return later.
290
902119
2574
15:16
So I think the research evidence
291
904693
3638
15:20
on the benefits of early childhood programs
292
908331
2638
15:22
for the local economy is extremely strong.
293
910969
3607
15:26
However, the moral and political choice
294
914576
4282
15:30
is still up to us, as citizens and as voters.
295
918858
5104
15:35
Thank you very much. (Applause)
296
923962
4023
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Timothy Bartik - EconomistThe author of "Investing in Kids," Timothy Bartik studies state and local economies -- and analyzes the benefits of preschool as an economic development program.
Why you should listen
In his 2011 book Investing in Kids: Early Childhood Programs and Local Economic Development, Timothy Bartik walks through the outsize benefits of educating children early -- not just educational benefits to the kids themselves, but measureable economic development that, in some cases, can outweigh other kinds of business incentives. (Curious? Download several sample chapters.)
Based at the Upjohn Institute in Michigan, Bartik studies regional economies and local labor markets, asking questions about job-creation programs, business incentives and the way government policies (such as tax credits, right-to-work laws and environmental regulations) have on business growth. He's the co-editor of Economic Development Quarterly: The Journal of American Economic Revitalization.
Timothy Bartik | Speaker | TED.com