TED2005
Howard Rheingold: The new power of collaboration
Filmed:
Readability: 5.4
1,181,175 views
Howard Rheingold talks about the coming world of collaboration, participatory media and collective action -- and how Wikipedia is really an outgrowth of our natural human instinct to work as a group.
Howard Rheingold - Digital community builder
Writer, artist and designer, theorist and community builder, Howard Rheingold is one of the driving minds behind our net-enabled, open, collaborative life. Full bio
Writer, artist and designer, theorist and community builder, Howard Rheingold is one of the driving minds behind our net-enabled, open, collaborative life. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:13
I'm here to enlist you
0
1000
6000
00:19
in helping reshape the story about how humans and other critters get things done.
1
7000
8000
00:27
Here is the old story -- we've already heard a little bit about it:
2
15000
5000
00:32
biology is war in which only the fiercest survive;
3
20000
7000
00:39
businesses and nations succeed only by defeating,
4
27000
8000
00:47
destroying and dominating competition;
5
35000
6000
00:53
politics is about your side winning at all costs.
6
41000
7000
01:00
But I think we can see the very beginnings of a new story beginning to emerge.
7
48000
8000
01:08
It's a narrative spread across a number of different disciplines,
8
56000
7000
01:15
in which cooperation, collective action and complex interdependencies
9
63000
8000
01:23
play a more important role.
10
71000
3000
01:26
And the central, but not all-important, role of competition and survival of the fittest
11
74000
9000
01:35
shrinks just a little bit to make room.
12
83000
4000
01:39
I started thinking about the relationship between communication, media
13
87000
7000
01:46
and collective action when I wrote "Smart Mobs,"
14
94000
5000
01:51
and I found that when I finished the book, I kept thinking about it.
15
99000
5000
01:56
In fact, if you look back, human communication media
16
104000
6000
02:02
and the ways in which we organize socially have been co-evolving for quite a long time.
17
110000
7000
02:09
Humans have lived for much, much longer
18
117000
4000
02:13
than the approximately 10,000 years of settled agricultural civilization
19
121000
7000
02:20
in small family groups. Nomadic hunters bring down rabbits, gathering food.
20
128000
8000
02:28
The form of wealth in those days was enough food to stay alive.
21
136000
5000
02:33
But at some point, they banded together to hunt bigger game.
22
141000
7000
02:40
And we don't know exactly how they did this,
23
148000
3000
02:43
although they must have solved some collective action problems;
24
151000
5000
02:48
it only makes sense that you can't hunt mastodons
25
156000
4000
02:52
while you're fighting with the other groups.
26
160000
3000
02:55
And again, we have no way of knowing,
27
163000
2000
02:57
but it's clear that a new form of wealth must have emerged.
28
165000
5000
03:02
More protein than a hunter's family could eat before it rotted.
29
170000
5000
03:07
So that raised a social question
30
175000
2000
03:09
that I believe must have driven new social forms.
31
177000
3000
03:12
Did the people who ate that mastodon meat owe something
32
180000
5000
03:17
to the hunters and their families?
33
185000
2000
03:19
And if so, how did they make arrangements?
34
187000
4000
03:23
Again, we can't know, but we can be pretty sure that some form of
35
191000
3000
03:26
symbolic communication must have been involved.
36
194000
5000
03:31
Of course, with agriculture came the first big civilizations,
37
199000
5000
03:36
the first cities built of mud and brick, the first empires.
38
204000
5000
03:41
And it was the administers of these empires
39
209000
4000
03:45
who began hiring people to keep track of the wheat and sheep and wine that was owed
40
213000
6000
03:51
and the taxes that was owed on them
41
219000
2000
03:53
by making marks; marks on clay in that time.
42
221000
4000
03:57
Not too much longer after that, the alphabet was invented.
43
225000
5000
04:02
And this powerful tool was really reserved, for thousands of years,
44
230000
6000
04:08
for the elite administrators (Laughter) who kept track of accounts for the empires.
45
236000
10000
04:18
And then another communication technology enabled new media:
46
246000
5000
04:23
the printing press came along, and within decades,
47
251000
5000
04:28
millions of people became literate.
48
256000
2000
04:30
And from literate populations,
49
258000
4000
04:34
new forms of collective action emerged in the spheres of knowledge,
50
262000
4000
04:38
religion and politics.
51
266000
4000
04:42
We saw scientific revolutions, the Protestant Reformation,
52
270000
5000
04:47
constitutional democracies possible where they had not been possible before.
53
275000
6000
04:53
Not created by the printing press,
54
281000
2000
04:55
but enabled by the collective action that emerges from literacy.
55
283000
5000
05:00
And again, new forms of wealth emerged.
56
288000
4000
05:04
Now, commerce is ancient. Markets are as old as the crossroads.
57
292000
5000
05:09
But capitalism, as we know it, is only a few hundred years old,
58
297000
4000
05:13
enabled by cooperative arrangements and technologies,
59
301000
5000
05:18
such as the joint-stock ownership company,
60
306000
3000
05:21
shared liability insurance, double-entry bookkeeping.
61
309000
5000
05:26
Now of course, the enabling technologies are based on the Internet,
62
314000
5000
05:31
and in the many-to-many era, every desktop is now a printing press,
63
319000
7000
05:38
a broadcasting station, a community or a marketplace.
64
326000
6000
05:44
Evolution is speeding up.
65
332000
3000
05:47
More recently, that power is untethering and leaping off the desktops,
66
335000
6000
05:53
and very, very quickly, we're going to see a significant proportion, if not the majority of
67
341000
6000
05:59
the human race, walking around holding, carrying or wearing supercomputers
68
347000
8000
06:07
linked at speeds greater
69
355000
3000
06:10
than what we consider to be broadband today.
70
358000
4000
06:14
Now, when I started looking into collective action,
71
362000
3000
06:17
the considerable literature on it is based on what sociologists call "social dilemmas."
72
365000
6000
06:23
And there are a couple of mythic narratives of social dilemmas.
73
371000
3000
06:26
I'm going to talk briefly about two of them:
74
374000
3000
06:29
the prisoner's dilemma and the tragedy of the commons.
75
377000
3000
06:32
Now, when I talked about this with Kevin Kelly,
76
380000
2000
06:34
he assured me that everybody in this audience pretty much knows the details
77
382000
4000
06:38
of the prisoner's dilemma,
78
386000
2000
06:40
so I'm just going to go over that very, very quickly.
79
388000
3000
06:43
If you have more questions about it, ask Kevin Kelly later. (Laughter)
80
391000
7000
06:50
The prisoner's dilemma is actually a story that's overlaid
81
398000
3000
06:53
on a mathematical matrix that came out of the game theory
82
401000
4000
06:57
in the early years of thinking about nuclear war:
83
405000
4000
07:01
two players who couldn't trust each other.
84
409000
2000
07:03
Let me just say that every unsecured transaction
85
411000
3000
07:06
is a good example of a prisoner's dilemma.
86
414000
3000
07:09
Person with the goods, person with the money,
87
417000
3000
07:12
because they can't trust each other, are not going to exchange.
88
420000
4000
07:16
Neither one wants to be the first one
89
424000
3000
07:19
or they're going to get the sucker's payoff,
90
427000
2000
07:21
but both lose, of course, because they don't get what they want.
91
429000
4000
07:25
If they could only agree, if they could only turn a prisoner's dilemma into
92
433000
4000
07:29
a different payoff matrix called an assurance game, they could proceed.
93
437000
6000
07:35
Twenty years ago, Robert Axelrod used the prisoner's dilemma
94
443000
4000
07:39
as a probe of the biological question:
95
447000
5000
07:44
if we are here because our ancestors were such fierce competitors,
96
452000
5000
07:49
how does cooperation exist at all?
97
457000
2000
07:51
He started a computer tournament for
98
459000
2000
07:53
people to submit prisoner's dilemma strategies and discovered,
99
461000
5000
07:58
much to his surprise, that a very, very simple strategy won --
100
466000
4000
08:02
it won the first tournament, and even after everyone knew it won,
101
470000
4000
08:06
it won the second tournament -- that's known as tit for tat.
102
474000
7000
08:13
Another economic game that may not be as well known as the prisoner's dilemma
103
481000
6000
08:19
is the ultimatum game,
104
487000
2000
08:21
and it's also a very interesting probe of
105
489000
2000
08:23
our assumptions about the way people make economic transactions.
106
491000
6000
08:29
Here's how the game is played: there are two players;
107
497000
3000
08:32
they've never played the game before,
108
500000
2000
08:34
they will not play the game again, they don't know each other,
109
502000
3000
08:37
and they are, in fact, in separate rooms.
110
505000
3000
08:40
First player is offered a hundred dollars
111
508000
2000
08:42
and is asked to propose a split: 50/50, 90/10,
112
510000
6000
08:48
whatever that player wants to propose. The second player either accepts the split --
113
516000
7000
08:55
both players are paid and the game is over --
114
523000
3000
08:58
or rejects the split -- neither player is paid and the game is over.
115
526000
6000
09:04
Now, the fundamental basis of neoclassical economics
116
532000
4000
09:08
would tell you it's irrational to reject a dollar
117
536000
4000
09:12
because someone you don't know in another room is going to get 99.
118
540000
5000
09:17
Yet in thousands of trials with American and European and Japanese students,
119
545000
6000
09:23
a significant percentage would reject any offer that's not close to 50/50.
120
551000
6000
09:29
And although they were screened and didn't know about the game
121
557000
5000
09:34
and had never played the game before,
122
562000
2000
09:36
proposers seemed to innately know this
123
564000
3000
09:39
because the average proposal was surprisingly close to 50/50.
124
567000
6000
09:45
Now, the interesting part comes in more recently
125
573000
2000
09:47
when anthropologists began taking this game to other cultures
126
575000
4000
09:51
and discovered, to their surprise,
127
579000
3000
09:54
that slash-and-burn agriculturalists in the Amazon
128
582000
4000
09:58
or nomadic pastoralists in Central Asia or a dozen different cultures --
129
586000
5000
10:03
each had radically different ideas of what is fair.
130
591000
5000
10:08
Which suggests that instead of there being an innate sense of fairness,
131
596000
6000
10:14
that somehow the basis of our economic
132
602000
3000
10:17
transactions can be influenced by our social institutions,
133
605000
6000
10:23
whether we know that or not.
134
611000
2000
10:25
The other major narrative of social dilemmas is the tragedy of the commons.
135
613000
5000
10:30
Garrett Hardin used it to talk about overpopulation in the late 1960s.
136
618000
6000
10:36
He used the example of a common grazing area in which each person
137
624000
6000
10:42
by simply maximizing their own flock
138
630000
3000
10:45
led to overgrazing and the depletion of the resource.
139
633000
3000
10:48
He had the rather gloomy conclusion that
140
636000
2000
10:50
humans will inevitably despoil any common pool resource
141
638000
5000
10:55
in which people cannot be restrained from using it.
142
643000
6000
11:01
Now, Elinor Ostrom, a political scientist, in
143
649000
3000
11:04
1990 asked the interesting question that any good scientist should ask,
144
652000
5000
11:09
which is: is it really true that humans will always despoil commons?
145
657000
5000
11:14
So she went out and looked at what data she could find.
146
662000
4000
11:18
She looked at thousands of cases of humans sharing watersheds,
147
666000
4000
11:22
forestry resources, fisheries, and discovered that yes, in case after case,
148
670000
7000
11:29
humans destroyed the commons that they depended on.
149
677000
4000
11:33
But she also found many instances in which people escaped the prisoner's dilemma;
150
681000
7000
11:40
in fact, the tragedy of the commons is a multiplayer prisoner's dilemma.
151
688000
6000
11:46
And she said that people are only prisoners if they consider themselves to be.
152
694000
5000
11:51
They escape by creating institutions for collective action.
153
699000
4000
11:55
And she discovered, I think most interestingly,
154
703000
4000
11:59
that among those institutions that worked,
155
707000
3000
12:02
there were a number of common design
156
710000
2000
12:04
principles, and those principles seem to be
157
712000
3000
12:07
missing from those institutions that don't work.
158
715000
4000
12:11
I'm moving very quickly over a number of
159
719000
2000
12:13
disciplines. In biology, the notions of symbiosis,
160
721000
3000
12:16
group selection, evolutionary psychology are contested, to be sure.
161
724000
6000
12:22
But there is really no longer any major debate over the fact that
162
730000
5000
12:27
cooperative arrangements have moved from a peripheral role to a central role
163
735000
6000
12:33
in biology, from the level of the cell to the level of the ecology.
164
741000
6000
12:39
And again, our notions of individuals as economic beings
165
747000
5000
12:44
have been overturned.
166
752000
2000
12:46
Rational self-interest is not always the dominating factor.
167
754000
5000
12:51
In fact, people will act to punish cheaters, even at a cost to themselves.
168
759000
8000
12:59
And most recently, neurophysiological measures
169
767000
2000
13:01
have shown that people who punish cheaters in economic games
170
769000
6000
13:07
show activity in the reward centers of their brain.
171
775000
4000
13:11
Which led one scientist to declare that altruistic punishment
172
779000
7000
13:18
may be the glue that holds societies together.
173
786000
4000
13:22
Now, I've been talking about how new forms of communication and new media
174
790000
5000
13:27
in the past have helped create new economic forms.
175
795000
4000
13:31
Commerce is ancient. Markets are very old. Capitalism is fairly recent;
176
799000
5000
13:36
socialism emerged as a reaction to that.
177
804000
4000
13:40
And yet we see very little talk about how the next form may be emerging.
178
808000
6000
13:46
Jim Surowiecki briefly mentioned Yochai Benkler's paper about open source,
179
814000
5000
13:51
pointing to a new form of production: peer-to-peer production.
180
819000
4000
13:55
I simply want you to keep in mind that if in the past, new forms of cooperation
181
823000
6000
14:01
enabled by new technologies create new forms of wealth,
182
829000
4000
14:05
we may be moving into yet another economic form
183
833000
4000
14:09
that is significantly different from previous ones.
184
837000
4000
14:13
Very briefly, let's look at some businesses. IBM, as you know, HP, Sun --
185
841000
6000
14:19
some of the most fierce competitors in the IT world are open sourcing
186
847000
6000
14:25
their software, are providing portfolios of patents for the commons.
187
853000
7000
14:32
Eli Lilly -- in, again, the fiercely competitive pharmaceutical world --
188
860000
5000
14:37
has created a market for solutions for pharmaceutical problems.
189
865000
6000
14:43
Toyota, instead of treating its suppliers as a marketplace,
190
871000
5000
14:48
treats them as a network and trains them to produce better,
191
876000
4000
14:52
even though they are also training them to produce better for their competitors.
192
880000
5000
14:57
Now none of these companies are doing this out of altruism;
193
885000
4000
15:01
they're doing it because they're learning that
194
889000
2000
15:03
a certain kind of sharing is in their self-interest.
195
891000
6000
15:09
Open source production has shown us that world-class software, like Linux and Mozilla,
196
897000
7000
15:16
can be created with neither the bureaucratic structure of the firm
197
904000
6000
15:22
nor the incentives of the marketplace as we've known them.
198
910000
6000
15:28
Google enriches itself by enriching thousands of bloggers through AdSense.
199
916000
6000
15:34
Amazon has opened its Application Programming Interface
200
922000
4000
15:38
to 60,000 developers, countless Amazon shops.
201
926000
5000
15:43
They're enriching others, not out of altruism but as a way of enriching themselves.
202
931000
6000
15:49
eBay solved the prisoner's dilemma and created a market
203
937000
5000
15:54
where none would have existed by creating a feedback mechanism
204
942000
4000
15:58
that turns a prisoner's dilemma game into an assurance game.
205
946000
5000
16:03
Instead of, "Neither of us can trust each other, so we have to make suboptimal moves,"
206
951000
5000
16:08
it's, "You prove to me that you are trustworthy and I will cooperate."
207
956000
6000
16:14
Wikipedia has used thousands of volunteers to create a free encyclopedia
208
962000
6000
16:20
with a million and a half articles in 200 languages in just a couple of years.
209
968000
7000
16:27
We've seen that ThinkCycle has enabled NGOs in developing countries
210
975000
7000
16:34
to put up problems to be solved by design students around the world,
211
982000
6000
16:40
including something that's being used for tsunami relief right now:
212
988000
3000
16:43
it's a mechanism for rehydrating
213
991000
2000
16:45
cholera victims that's so simple to use it,
214
993000
3000
16:48
illiterates can be trained to use it.
215
996000
3000
16:51
BitTorrent turns every downloader into an uploader,
216
999000
4000
16:55
making the system more efficient the more it is used.
217
1003000
5000
17:00
Millions of people have contributed their desktop computers
218
1008000
3000
17:03
when they're not using them to link together through the Internet
219
1011000
5000
17:08
into supercomputing collectives
220
1016000
2000
17:10
that help solve the protein folding problem for medical researchers --
221
1018000
4000
17:14
that's Folding@home at Stanford --
222
1022000
3000
17:17
to crack codes, to search for life in outer space.
223
1025000
5000
17:22
I don't think we know enough yet.
224
1030000
2000
17:24
I don't think we've even begun to discover what the basic principles are,
225
1032000
4000
17:28
but I think we can begin to think about them.
226
1036000
3000
17:31
And I don't have enough time to talk about all of them,
227
1039000
3000
17:34
but think about self-interest.
228
1042000
2000
17:36
This is all about self-interest that adds up to more.
229
1044000
3000
17:39
In El Salvador, both sides that withdrew from their civil war
230
1047000
5000
17:44
took moves that had been proven to mirror a prisoner's dilemma strategy.
231
1052000
4000
17:48
In the U.S., in the Philippines, in Kenya, around the world,
232
1056000
6000
17:54
citizens have self-organized political protests and
233
1062000
3000
17:57
get out the vote campaigns using mobile devices and SMS.
234
1065000
6000
18:03
Is an Apollo Project of cooperation possible?
235
1071000
3000
18:06
A transdisciplinary study of cooperation?
236
1074000
4000
18:10
I believe that the payoff would be very big.
237
1078000
4000
18:14
I think we need to begin developing maps of this territory
238
1082000
4000
18:18
so that we can talk about it across disciplines.
239
1086000
2000
18:20
And I am not saying that understanding cooperation
240
1088000
4000
18:24
is going to cause us to be better people --
241
1092000
4000
18:28
and sometimes people cooperate to do bad things --
242
1096000
3000
18:31
but I will remind you that a few hundred years ago,
243
1099000
3000
18:34
people saw their loved ones die from diseases they thought
244
1102000
4000
18:38
were caused by sin or foreigners or evil spirits.
245
1106000
5000
18:43
Descartes said we need an entire new way of thinking.
246
1111000
4000
18:47
When the scientific method provided that new way of thinking
247
1115000
3000
18:50
and biology showed that microorganisms caused disease,
248
1118000
4000
18:54
suffering was alleviated.
249
1122000
3000
18:57
What forms of suffering could be alleviated,
250
1125000
3000
19:00
what forms of wealth could be created
251
1128000
2000
19:02
if we knew a little bit more about cooperation?
252
1130000
3000
19:05
I don't think that this transdisciplinary discourse
253
1133000
4000
19:09
is automatically going to happen;
254
1137000
2000
19:11
it's going to require effort.
255
1139000
3000
19:14
So I enlist you to help me get the cooperation project started.
256
1142000
6000
19:20
Thank you.
257
1148000
2000
19:22
(Applause)
258
1150000
3000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Howard Rheingold - Digital community builderWriter, artist and designer, theorist and community builder, Howard Rheingold is one of the driving minds behind our net-enabled, open, collaborative life.
Why you should listen
As Howard Rheingold himself puts it, "I fell into the computer realm from the typewriter dimension, then plugged my computer into my telephone and got sucked into the net." A writer and designer, he was among the first wave of creative thinkers who saw, in computers and then in the Internet, a way to form powerful new communities.
His 2002 book Smart Mobs, which presaged Web 2.0 in predicting collaborative ventures like Wikipedia, was the outgrowth of decades spent studying and living life online. An early and active member of the Well (he wrote about it in The Virtual Community), he went on to cofound HotWired and Electric Minds, two groundbreaking web communities, in the mid-1990s. Now active in Second Life, he teaches, writes and consults on social networking. His latest passion: teaching and workshopping participatory media literacy, to make sure we all know how to read and make the new media that we're all creating together.
Howard Rheingold | Speaker | TED.com