TEDxLondon
Eugenia Cheng: An unexpected tool for understanding inequality: abstract math
Filmed:
Readability: 3.5
478,298 views
How do we make sense of a world that doesn't? By looking in unexpected places, says mathematician Eugenia Cheng. She explains how applying concepts from abstract mathematics to daily life can lead us to a deeper understanding of things like the root of anger and the function of privilege. Learn more about how this surprising tool can help us to empathize with each other.
Eugenia Cheng - Mathematician, pianist
Eugenia Cheng devotes her life to mathematics, the piano and helping people. Full bio
Eugenia Cheng devotes her life to mathematics, the piano and helping people. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:13
The world is awash
with divisive arguments,
with divisive arguments,
0
1247
5613
00:18
conflict,
1
6884
1873
00:20
fake news,
2
8781
1813
00:22
victimhood,
3
10618
1586
00:25
exploitation, prejudice,
bigotry, blame, shouting
bigotry, blame, shouting
4
13146
5701
00:30
and minuscule attention spans.
5
18871
2923
00:34
It can sometimes seem
that we are doomed to take sides,
that we are doomed to take sides,
6
22859
5189
00:40
be stuck in echo chambers
7
28072
2262
00:42
and never agree again.
8
30358
2317
00:45
It can sometimes seem
like a race to the bottom,
like a race to the bottom,
9
33342
3001
00:48
where everyone is calling out
somebody else's privilege
somebody else's privilege
10
36367
4018
00:52
and vying to show that they
are the most hard-done-by person
are the most hard-done-by person
11
40409
5114
00:57
in the conversation.
12
45547
1538
01:01
How can we make sense
13
49033
1830
01:02
in a world that doesn't?
14
50887
2404
01:07
I have a tool for understanding
this confusing world of ours,
this confusing world of ours,
15
55604
4757
01:12
a tool that you might not expect:
16
60385
2908
01:16
abstract mathematics.
17
64194
1654
01:19
I am a pure mathematician.
18
67268
2383
01:22
Traditionally, pure maths
is like the theory of maths,
is like the theory of maths,
19
70063
4013
01:26
where applied maths is applied
to real problems like building bridges
to real problems like building bridges
20
74100
5169
01:31
and flying planes
21
79293
1515
01:32
and controlling traffic flow.
22
80832
2343
01:35
But I'm going to talk about a way
that pure maths applies directly
that pure maths applies directly
23
83894
4926
01:40
to our daily lives
24
88844
1509
01:42
as a way of thinking.
25
90377
1845
01:44
I don't solve quadratic equations
to help me with my daily life,
to help me with my daily life,
26
92931
4188
01:49
but I do use mathematical thinking
to help me understand arguments
to help me understand arguments
27
97143
5142
01:54
and to empathize with other people.
28
102309
2509
01:57
And so pure maths helps me
with the entire human world.
with the entire human world.
29
105501
5608
02:04
But before I talk about
the entire human world,
the entire human world,
30
112434
3111
02:07
I need to talk about something
that you might think of
that you might think of
31
115569
3060
02:10
as irrelevant schools maths:
32
118653
2686
02:13
factors of numbers.
33
121974
2079
02:16
We're going to start
by thinking about the factors of 30.
by thinking about the factors of 30.
34
124077
3556
02:19
Now, if this makes you shudder
with bad memories of school maths lessons,
with bad memories of school maths lessons,
35
127657
4716
02:24
I sympathize, because I found
school maths lessons boring, too.
school maths lessons boring, too.
36
132397
4598
02:29
But I'm pretty sure we are going
to take this in a direction
to take this in a direction
37
137480
3883
02:33
that is very different
from what happened at school.
from what happened at school.
38
141387
3441
02:37
So what are the factors of 30?
39
145718
1726
02:39
Well, they're the numbers that go into 30.
40
147468
3225
02:42
Maybe you can remember them.
We'll work them out.
We'll work them out.
41
150717
2401
02:45
It's one, two, three,
42
153142
3814
02:48
five, six,
43
156980
2092
02:51
10, 15 and 30.
44
159096
2860
02:53
It's not very interesting.
45
161980
1477
02:55
It's a bunch of numbers
in a straight line.
in a straight line.
46
163957
2399
02:58
We can make it more interesting
47
166826
1523
03:00
by thinking about which of these numbers
are also factors of each other
are also factors of each other
48
168373
3690
03:04
and drawing a picture,
a bit like a family tree,
a bit like a family tree,
49
172087
2528
03:06
to show those relationships.
50
174639
1706
03:08
So 30 is going to be at the top
like a kind of great-grandparent.
like a kind of great-grandparent.
51
176369
4070
03:12
Six, 10 and 15 go into 30.
52
180463
2597
03:15
Five goes into 10 and 15.
53
183689
2800
03:18
Two goes into six and 10.
54
186945
2687
03:21
Three goes into six and 15.
55
189656
3287
03:24
And one goes into two, three and five.
56
192967
4184
03:29
So now we see that 10
is not divisible by three,
is not divisible by three,
57
197175
3735
03:32
but that this is the corners of a cube,
58
200934
3180
03:36
which is, I think, a bit more interesting
59
204138
2081
03:38
than a bunch of numbers
in a straight line.
in a straight line.
60
206243
2124
03:41
We can see something more here.
There's a hierarchy going on.
There's a hierarchy going on.
61
209756
2910
03:44
At the bottom level is the number one,
62
212690
1871
03:46
then there's the numbers
two, three and five,
two, three and five,
63
214585
2244
03:48
and nothing goes into those
except one and themselves.
except one and themselves.
64
216853
2810
03:51
You might remember
this means they're prime.
this means they're prime.
65
219687
2430
03:54
At the next level up,
we have six, 10 and 15,
we have six, 10 and 15,
66
222141
3033
03:57
and each of those is a product
of two prime factors.
of two prime factors.
67
225198
3508
04:00
So six is two times three,
68
228730
1942
04:02
10 is two times five,
69
230696
1671
04:04
15 is three times five.
70
232391
1961
04:06
And then at the top, we have 30,
71
234376
1965
04:08
which is a product
of three prime numbers --
of three prime numbers --
72
236365
2495
04:10
two times three times five.
73
238884
2053
04:12
So I could redraw this diagram
using those numbers instead.
using those numbers instead.
74
240961
4619
04:18
We see that we've got
two, three and five at the top,
two, three and five at the top,
75
246335
3068
04:21
we have pairs of numbers
at the next level,
at the next level,
76
249427
3072
04:24
and we have single elements
at the next level
at the next level
77
252523
2387
04:26
and then the empty set at the bottom.
78
254934
1918
04:29
And each of those arrows shows
losing one of your numbers in the set.
losing one of your numbers in the set.
79
257271
5379
04:34
Now maybe it can be clear
80
262674
2617
04:37
that it doesn't really matter
what those numbers are.
what those numbers are.
81
265315
2858
04:40
In fact, it doesn't matter what they are.
82
268197
1959
04:42
So we could replace them with
something like A, B and C instead,
something like A, B and C instead,
83
270180
4396
04:46
and we get the same picture.
84
274600
1735
04:49
So now this has become very abstract.
85
277025
2117
04:51
The numbers have turned into letters.
86
279626
1984
04:54
But there is a point to this abstraction,
87
282091
3478
04:57
which is that it now suddenly
becomes very widely applicable,
becomes very widely applicable,
88
285593
4585
05:02
because A, B and C could be anything.
89
290202
3674
05:06
For example, they could be
three types of privilege:
three types of privilege:
90
294291
4318
05:10
rich, white and male.
91
298633
2693
05:14
So then at the next level,
we have rich white people.
we have rich white people.
92
302386
3190
05:18
Here we have rich male people.
93
306368
2481
05:20
Here we have white male people.
94
308873
2049
05:22
Then we have rich, white and male.
95
310946
3615
05:27
And finally, people with none
of those types of privilege.
of those types of privilege.
96
315209
3132
05:30
And I'm going to put back in
the rest of the adjectives for emphasis.
the rest of the adjectives for emphasis.
97
318365
3269
05:33
So here we have rich, white
non-male people,
non-male people,
98
321658
3030
05:36
to remind us that there are
nonbinary people we need to include.
nonbinary people we need to include.
99
324712
3049
05:39
Here we have rich, nonwhite male people.
100
327785
2653
05:42
Here we have non-rich, white male people,
101
330462
3296
05:45
rich, nonwhite, non-male,
102
333782
2702
05:48
non-rich, white, non-male
103
336508
2551
05:51
and non-rich, nonwhite, male.
104
339083
2335
05:53
And at the bottom,
with the least privilege,
with the least privilege,
105
341442
2197
05:55
non-rich, nonwhite, non-male people.
106
343663
4043
05:59
We have gone from a diagram
of factors of 30
of factors of 30
107
347730
3812
06:03
to a diagram of interaction
of different types of privilege.
of different types of privilege.
108
351566
3930
06:08
And there are many things
we can learn from this diagram, I think.
we can learn from this diagram, I think.
109
356068
3622
06:11
The first is that each arrow represents
a direct loss of one type of privilege.
a direct loss of one type of privilege.
110
359714
6811
06:19
Sometimes people mistakenly think
that white privilege means
that white privilege means
111
367331
4483
06:23
all white people are better off
than all nonwhite people.
than all nonwhite people.
112
371838
4548
06:28
Some people point at superrich
black sports stars and say,
black sports stars and say,
113
376410
3712
06:32
"See? They're really rich.
White privilege doesn't exist."
White privilege doesn't exist."
114
380146
3456
06:36
But that's not what the theory
of white privilege says.
of white privilege says.
115
384116
3029
06:39
It says that if that superrich sports star
had all the same characteristics
had all the same characteristics
116
387169
5238
06:44
but they were also white,
117
392431
1476
06:45
we would expect them
to be better off in society.
to be better off in society.
118
393931
3432
06:51
There is something else
we can understand from this diagram
we can understand from this diagram
119
399302
2785
06:54
if we look along a row.
120
402111
1986
06:56
If we look along the second-to-top row,
where people have two types of privilege,
where people have two types of privilege,
121
404121
4281
07:00
we might be able to see
that they're not all particularly equal.
that they're not all particularly equal.
122
408426
3956
07:04
For example, rich white women
are probably much better off in society
are probably much better off in society
123
412406
6079
07:10
than poor white men,
124
418509
2195
07:12
and rich black men are probably
somewhere in between.
somewhere in between.
125
420728
3006
07:15
So it's really more skewed like this,
126
423758
2777
07:18
and the same on the bottom level.
127
426559
1933
07:20
But we can actually take it further
128
428990
2091
07:23
and look at the interactions
between those two middle levels.
between those two middle levels.
129
431105
3571
07:27
Because rich, nonwhite non-men
might well be better off in society
might well be better off in society
130
435076
5936
07:33
than poor white men.
131
441036
2093
07:35
Think about some extreme
examples, like Michelle Obama,
examples, like Michelle Obama,
132
443153
3908
07:39
Oprah Winfrey.
133
447085
1418
07:40
They're definitely better off
than poor, white, unemployed homeless men.
than poor, white, unemployed homeless men.
134
448527
5013
07:46
So actually, the diagram
is more skewed like this.
is more skewed like this.
135
454164
2780
07:49
And that tension exists
136
457519
2703
07:52
between the layers
of privilege in the diagram
of privilege in the diagram
137
460246
3239
07:55
and the absolute privilege
that people experience in society.
that people experience in society.
138
463509
3665
07:59
And this has helped me to understand
why some poor white men
why some poor white men
139
467198
3674
08:02
are so angry in society at the moment.
140
470896
3409
08:06
Because they are considered to be high up
in this cuboid of privilege,
in this cuboid of privilege,
141
474329
4427
08:10
but in terms of absolute privilege,
they don't actually feel the effect of it.
they don't actually feel the effect of it.
142
478780
4783
08:15
And I believe that understanding
the root of that anger
the root of that anger
143
483587
3446
08:19
is much more productive
than just being angry at them in return.
than just being angry at them in return.
144
487057
4287
08:25
Seeing these abstract structures
can also help us switch contexts
can also help us switch contexts
145
493289
4550
08:29
and see that different people
are at the top in different contexts.
are at the top in different contexts.
146
497863
3646
08:33
In our original diagram,
147
501533
1780
08:35
rich white men were at the top,
148
503337
2003
08:37
but if we restricted
our attention to non-men,
our attention to non-men,
149
505364
3702
08:41
we would see that they are here,
150
509090
1690
08:42
and now the rich, white
non-men are at the top.
non-men are at the top.
151
510804
2731
08:45
So we could move to
a whole context of women,
a whole context of women,
152
513559
2845
08:48
and our three types of privilege
could now be rich, white and cisgendered.
could now be rich, white and cisgendered.
153
516428
5144
08:53
Remember that "cisgendered" means
that your gender identity does match
that your gender identity does match
154
521596
3705
08:57
the gender you were assigned at birth.
155
525325
1965
09:00
So now we see that rich, white cis women
occupy the analogous situation
occupy the analogous situation
156
528021
6012
09:06
that rich white men did
in broader society.
in broader society.
157
534057
3174
09:09
And this has helped me understand
why there is so much anger
why there is so much anger
158
537255
3428
09:12
towards rich white women,
159
540707
1653
09:14
especially in some parts
of the feminist movement at the moment,
of the feminist movement at the moment,
160
542384
3522
09:17
because perhaps they're prone
to seeing themselves as underprivileged
to seeing themselves as underprivileged
161
545930
3660
09:21
relative to white men,
162
549614
1813
09:23
and they forget how overprivileged
they are relative to nonwhite women.
they are relative to nonwhite women.
163
551451
5111
09:30
We can all use these abstract structures
to help us pivot between situations
to help us pivot between situations
164
558554
5440
09:36
in which we are more privileged
and less privileged.
and less privileged.
165
564018
2592
09:38
We are all more privileged than somebody
166
566634
2523
09:41
and less privileged than somebody else.
167
569181
2438
09:44
For example, I know and I feel
that as an Asian person,
that as an Asian person,
168
572738
4784
09:49
I am less privileged than white people
169
577546
2730
09:52
because of white privilege.
170
580300
1475
09:53
But I also understand
171
581799
1648
09:55
that I am probably among
the most privileged of nonwhite people,
the most privileged of nonwhite people,
172
583471
4129
09:59
and this helps me pivot
between those two contexts.
between those two contexts.
173
587624
3119
10:03
And in terms of wealth,
174
591595
1693
10:05
I don't think I'm super rich.
175
593312
1843
10:07
I'm not as rich as the kind of people
who don't have to work.
who don't have to work.
176
595179
3045
10:10
But I am doing fine,
177
598248
1548
10:11
and that's a much better
situation to be in
situation to be in
178
599820
2155
10:13
than people who are really struggling,
179
601999
1811
10:15
maybe are unemployed
or working at minimum wage.
or working at minimum wage.
180
603834
3061
10:20
I perform these pivots in my head
181
608566
3426
10:24
to help me understand experiences
from other people's points of view,
from other people's points of view,
182
612016
5239
10:30
which brings me to this
possibly surprising conclusion:
possibly surprising conclusion:
183
618412
3989
10:35
that abstract mathematics
is highly relevant to our daily lives
is highly relevant to our daily lives
184
623242
6834
10:42
and can even help us to understand
and empathize with other people.
and empathize with other people.
185
630100
6720
10:50
My wish is that everybody would try
to understand other people more
to understand other people more
186
638584
5639
10:56
and work with them together,
187
644247
1916
10:58
rather than competing with them
188
646187
2021
11:00
and trying to show that they're wrong.
189
648232
2611
11:04
And I believe that abstract
mathematical thinking
mathematical thinking
190
652031
4567
11:08
can help us achieve that.
191
656622
2080
11:12
Thank you.
192
660265
1205
11:13
(Applause)
193
661494
4155
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Eugenia Cheng - Mathematician, pianistEugenia Cheng devotes her life to mathematics, the piano and helping people.
Why you should listen
Dr. Eugenia Cheng quit her tenured academic job for a portfolio career as a research mathematician, educator, author, columnist, public speaker, artist and pianist. Her aim is to rid the world of math phobia and develop, demonstrate and advocate for the role of mathematics in addressing issues of social justice.
Her first popular math book, How to Bake Pi, was published by Basic Books in 2015 to widespread acclaim including from the New York Times, National Geographic, Scientific American, and she was interviewed around the world including on the BBC, NPR and The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. Her second book, Beyond Infinity was published in 2017 and was shortlisted for the Royal Society Insight Investment ScienceBook Prize. Her most recent book, The Art of Logic in an Illogical World, was published in 2018 and was praised in the Guardian.
Cheng was an early pioneer of math on YouTube, and her most viewed video, about math and bagels, has been viewed more than 18 million times to date. She has also assisted with mathematics in elementary schools and high schools for 20 years. Cheng writes the "Everyday Math" column for the Wall Street Journal, is a concert pianist and founded the Liederstube, a not-for-profit organization in Chicago bringing classical music to a wider audience. In 2017 she completed her first mathematical art commission, for Hotel EMC2 in Chicago; her second was installed in 2018 in the Living Architecture exhibit at 6018 North.
Cheng is Scientist In Residence at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago and won tenure in Pure Mathematics at the University of Sheffield, UK. She is now Honorary Fellow at the University of Sheffield and Honorary Visiting Fellow at City University, London. She has previously taught at the universities of Cambridge, Chicago and Nice and holds a PhD in pure mathematics from the University of Cambridge. Her research is in the field of Category Theory, and to date she has published 16 research papers in international journals.
You can learn more about her in this in-depth biographic interview on the BBC's Life Scientific.
Eugenia Cheng | Speaker | TED.com