ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Deborah Lipstadt - Historian
Deborah Lipstadt's research focuses on the development of Holocaust denial and how to fight for the truth in an era marked by "alternative facts."

Why you should listen

Dr. Deborah E. Lipstadt, Dorot professor of Holocaust Studies at Emory University in Atlanta, was sued for libel in 1996 by David Irving for having called him a Holocaust denier. After a ten-week trial in London in 2000, in an overwhelming victory for Lipstadt, the judge found Irving to be a "neo-Nazi polemicist" who "perverts" history and engages in "racist" and "anti-Semitic" discourse. The Daily Telegraph (London) described the trial as having "done for the new century what the Nuremberg tribunals or the Eichmann trial did for earlier generations." The Times (London) described it as "history has had its day in court and scored a crushing victory." According to the New York Times, the trial "put an end to the pretense that Mr. Irving is anything but a self-promoting apologist for Hitler."

The movie Denial, starring Rachel Weisz and Tom Wilkenson with a screenplay by David Hare, tells the story of this legal battle.  It is based on Lipstadt's book, History on Trial: My Day in Court with a Holocaust Denier (Harper Collins, 2006), and recently reissued as Denial (Harper Collins, 2016). The film was nominated for a BAFTA as one of the best British films of the year.

Lipstadt has written most recently Holocaust: An American Understanding (Rutgers, 2016), which explores how America has understood and interpreted the Holocaust since 1945.

Her previous book, The Eichmann Trial, (Schocken/Nextbook, 2011) published in commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the Eichmann trial, was called by Publisher's Weekly, "a penetrating and authoritative dissection of a landmark case and its after effects." The New York Times Book Review described Lipstadt as having "done a great service by … recovering the event as a gripping legal drama, as well as a hinge moment in Israel's history and in the world's delayed awakening to the magnitude of the Holocaust."

She has also published Beyond Belief: The American Press And The Coming Of The Holocaust, 1933-1945 (Free Press, 1986), which surveys what the American press wrote about the persecution of the Jews in the years 1933-1945.  She is currently writing a book, The Antisemitic Delusion: Letters to a Concerned Student which will be published in 2018.

At Emory, Lipstadt directs the website known as HDOT, Holocaust Denial on Trial, which contains a complete archive of the proceedings of Irving v. Penguin UK and Deborah Lipstadt. It also provides answers to frequent claims made by deniers. Lipstadt has won the Emery Williams Teaching Award, and she was selected for the award by alumni as the teacher who had most influenced them.

Lipstadt was a historical consultant to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, helping design the section of the Museum dedicated to the American Response to the Holocaust. She has held a Presidential appointment to the United States Holocaust Memorial Council (from Presidents Clinton and Obama) and was asked by President George W. Bush to represent the White House at the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz.

Lipstadt has a BA from the City College of New York and an MA and PhD from Brandeis University.

More profile about the speaker
Deborah Lipstadt | Speaker | TED.com
TEDxSkoll

Deborah Lipstadt: Behind the lies of Holocaust denial

Filmed:
1,378,476 views

"There are facts, there are opinions, and there are lies," says historian Deborah Lipstadt, telling the remarkable story of her research into Holocaust deniers -- and their deliberate distortion of history. Lipstadt encourages us all to go on the offensive against those who assault the truth and facts. "Truth is not relative," she says.
- Historian
Deborah Lipstadt's research focuses on the development of Holocaust denial and how to fight for the truth in an era marked by "alternative facts." Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:13
I come to you today to speak of liars,
0
1082
4083
00:17
lawsuits
1
5189
1423
00:18
and laughter.
2
6636
1340
00:20
The first time I heard
about Holocaust denial,
3
8910
3110
00:24
I laughed.
4
12044
1302
00:25
Holocaust denial?
5
13970
1752
00:28
The Holocaust which has
the dubious distinction
6
16187
3430
00:31
of being the best-documented
genocide in the world?
7
19641
4495
00:37
Who could believe it didn't happen?
8
25046
2026
00:40
Think about it.
9
28106
1347
00:42
For deniers to be right,
10
30257
2281
00:44
who would have to be wrong?
11
32562
1896
00:47
Well, first of all, the victims --
12
35011
2766
00:49
the survivors who have told us
their harrowing stories.
13
37801
4717
00:55
Who else would have to be wrong?
14
43721
2314
00:58
The bystanders.
15
46059
1953
01:00
The people who lived in the myriads
of towns and villages and cities
16
48036
3978
01:04
on the Eastern front,
17
52038
1972
01:06
who watched their neighbors
be rounded up --
18
54034
2442
01:08
men, women, children, young, old --
19
56500
3213
01:11
and be marched
to the outskirts of the town
20
59737
2720
01:14
to be shot and left dead in ditches.
21
62481
2992
01:17
Or the Poles,
22
65985
1330
01:19
who lived in towns and villages
around the death camps,
23
67339
4681
01:24
who watched day after day
24
72044
2376
01:26
as the trains went in filled with people
25
74444
2742
01:29
and came out empty.
26
77210
1523
01:31
But above all, who would have to be wrong?
27
79787
3633
01:36
The perpetrators.
28
84005
1464
01:38
The people who say, "We did it.
29
86112
2906
01:41
I did it."
30
89479
1524
01:43
Now, maybe they add a caveat.
31
91027
2149
01:45
They say, "I didn't have a choice;
I was forced to do it."
32
93200
4424
01:50
But nonetheless, they say, "I did it."
33
98104
2669
01:53
Think about it.
34
101938
1551
01:55
In not one war crimes trial
since the end of World War II
35
103513
5939
02:01
has a perpetrator of any nationality
ever said, "It didn't happen."
36
109476
6636
02:09
Again, they may have said, "I was forced,"
but never that it didn't happen.
37
117078
4582
02:13
Having thought that through,
38
121684
1474
02:15
I decided denial was not
going to be on my agenda;
39
123182
3951
02:19
I had bigger things to worry about,
to write about, to research,
40
127157
3708
02:22
and I moved on.
41
130889
1314
02:24
Fast-forward a little over a decade,
42
132911
2819
02:27
and two senior scholars --
43
135754
1812
02:29
two of the most prominent historians
of the Holocaust --
44
137590
3158
02:32
approached me and said,
45
140772
1257
02:34
"Deborah, let's have coffee.
46
142053
1789
02:35
We have a research idea
that we think is perfect for you."
47
143866
3597
02:39
Intrigued and flattered
that they came to me with an idea
48
147487
3833
02:43
and thought me worthy of it,
49
151344
1577
02:44
I asked, "What is it?"
50
152945
2096
02:47
And they said, "Holocaust denial."
51
155665
2989
02:51
And for the second time, I laughed.
52
159353
2495
02:54
Holocaust denial?
53
162336
1924
02:56
The Flat Earth folks?
54
164284
1986
02:58
The Elvis-is-alive people?
55
166294
2137
03:00
I should study them?
56
168455
2188
03:03
And these two guys said,
57
171326
1317
03:04
"Yeah, we're intrigued.
58
172667
1933
03:07
What are they about?
59
175012
1572
03:08
What's their objective?
60
176608
1750
03:10
How do they manage to get people
to believe what they say?"
61
178382
3654
03:14
So thinking, if they thought
it was worthwhile,
62
182756
3528
03:18
I would take a momentary diversion --
63
186308
3374
03:21
maybe a year, maybe two,
three, maybe even four --
64
189706
2938
03:24
in academic terms, that's momentary.
65
192668
2245
03:26
(Laughter)
66
194937
1142
03:28
We work very slowly.
67
196103
2387
03:30
(Laughter)
68
198514
1572
03:32
And I would look at them.
69
200110
1802
03:33
So I did.
70
201936
1155
03:35
I did my research, and I came up
with a number of things,
71
203115
2839
03:37
two of which I'd like to share
with you today.
72
205978
2593
03:40
One:
73
208595
1333
03:41
deniers are wolves in sheep's clothing.
74
209952
4957
03:47
They are the same: Nazis, neo-Nazis --
75
215712
2965
03:50
you can decide whether you want
to put a "neo" there or not.
76
218701
3227
03:54
But when I looked at them,
77
222786
2333
03:57
I didn't see any SS-like uniforms,
78
225143
4726
04:01
swastika-like symbols on the wall,
79
229893
3151
04:05
Sieg Heil salutes --
80
233068
2057
04:07
none of that.
81
235149
1544
04:08
What I found instead
82
236717
2870
04:11
were people parading
as respectable academics.
83
239611
4615
04:16
What did they have?
84
244916
1221
04:18
They had an institute.
85
246161
1698
04:19
An "Institute for Historical Review."
86
247883
3844
04:24
They had a journal -- a slick journal --
87
252392
2554
04:26
a "Journal of Historical Review."
88
254970
2954
04:30
One filled with papers --
89
258398
2706
04:33
footnote-laden papers.
90
261128
2044
04:35
And they had a new name.
91
263923
1940
04:38
Not neo-Nazis,
92
266500
2168
04:40
not anti-Semites --
93
268692
2490
04:43
revisionists.
94
271206
1258
04:44
They said, "We are revisionists.
95
272991
2215
04:47
We are out to do one thing:
96
275230
2683
04:49
to revise mistakes in history."
97
277937
3560
04:54
But all you had to do was go
one inch below the surface,
98
282369
5410
04:59
and what did you find there?
99
287803
1907
05:01
The same adulation of Hitler,
100
289734
2490
05:04
praise of the Third Reich,
101
292248
1875
05:06
anti-Semitism, racism, prejudice.
102
294147
2942
05:09
This is what intrigued me.
103
297904
2446
05:12
It was anti-Semitism, racism, prejudice,
parading as rational discourse.
104
300374
6997
05:20
The other thing I found --
105
308730
1587
05:22
many of us have been taught to think
there are facts and there are opinions --
106
310341
3745
05:26
after studying deniers,
107
314110
1456
05:27
I think differently.
108
315590
1336
05:29
There are facts,
109
317438
1648
05:31
there are opinions,
110
319110
1714
05:32
and there are lies.
111
320848
1612
05:35
And what deniers want to do
is take their lies,
112
323149
4426
05:40
dress them up as opinions --
113
328565
1632
05:42
maybe edgy opinions,
114
330221
1990
05:44
maybe sort of out-of-the-box opinions --
115
332235
2709
05:46
but then if they're opinions,
116
334968
1384
05:48
they should be part of the conversation.
117
336376
2132
05:50
And then they encroach on the facts.
118
338532
3393
05:55
I published my work --
119
343305
1563
05:56
the book was published,
120
344892
1174
05:58
"Denying the Holocaust: The Growing
Assault on Truth and Memory,"
121
346090
3402
06:01
it came out in many different countries,
122
349516
1956
06:03
including here in Penguin UK,
123
351496
2160
06:05
and I was done with those folks
and ready to move on.
124
353680
3430
06:10
Then came the letter from Penguin UK.
125
358163
3708
06:14
And for the third time, I laughed ...
126
362434
2768
06:19
mistakenly.
127
367088
1240
06:20
I opened the letter,
128
368972
1730
06:22
and it informed me that David Irving
was bringing a libel suit against me
129
370726
5888
06:28
in the United Kingdom
130
376638
1597
06:30
for calling him a Holocaust denier.
131
378259
3036
06:33
David Irving suing me?
132
381953
1934
06:35
Who was David Irving?
133
383911
1204
06:37
David Irving was a writer
of historical works,
134
385139
2607
06:39
most of them about World War II,
135
387770
2023
06:41
and virtually all of those works
took the position
136
389817
3219
06:45
that the Nazis were really not so bad,
137
393060
3578
06:48
and the allies were really not so good.
138
396662
3084
06:51
And the Jews, whatever happened to them,
139
399770
2105
06:53
they sort of deserved it.
140
401899
1310
06:56
He knew the documents,
141
404206
1491
06:57
he knew the facts,
142
405721
1443
06:59
but he somehow twisted them
to get this opinion.
143
407188
3172
07:03
He hadn't always been a Holocaust denier,
144
411016
2512
07:05
but in the late '80s,
145
413552
1741
07:07
he embraced it with great vigor.
146
415317
2427
07:11
The reason I laughed also
was this was a man
147
419517
3905
07:15
who not only was a Holocaust denier,
148
423446
1934
07:17
but seemed quite proud of it.
149
425404
1695
07:19
Here was a man -- and I quote --
150
427123
1624
07:20
who said, "I'm going to sink
the battleship Auschwitz."
151
428771
3694
07:25
Here was a man
152
433345
1172
07:26
who pointed to the number tattooed
on a survivor's arm and said,
153
434541
4020
07:31
"How much money have you made
154
439716
1592
07:33
from having that number
tattooed on your arm?"
155
441332
3400
07:37
Here was a man who said,
156
445549
1908
07:39
"More people died in Senator Kennedy's car
157
447481
2956
07:42
at Chappaquiddick
158
450461
1312
07:43
than died in gas chambers at Auschwitz."
159
451797
3314
07:47
That's an American reference,
but you can look it up.
160
455135
2837
07:51
This was not a man who seemed
at all ashamed or reticent
161
459406
3014
07:54
about being a Holocaust denier.
162
462444
2069
07:57
Now, lots of my academic
colleagues counseled me --
163
465136
3780
08:00
"Eh, Deborah, just ignore it."
164
468940
1906
08:02
When I explained you can't just
ignore a libel suit,
165
470870
3588
08:06
they said, "Who's going to
believe him anyway?"
166
474482
2782
08:09
But here was the problem:
167
477783
2080
08:11
British law put the onus,
put the burden of proof on me
168
479887
5308
08:17
to prove the truth of what I said,
169
485219
2682
08:19
in contrast to as it would have
been in the United States
170
487925
2763
08:22
and in many other countries:
171
490712
1504
08:24
on him to prove the falsehood.
172
492240
3006
08:27
What did that mean?
173
495921
1461
08:29
That meant if I didn't fight,
174
497406
3376
08:32
he would win by default.
175
500806
2426
08:35
And if he won by default,
176
503791
1755
08:37
he could then legitimately say,
177
505570
2641
08:40
"My David Irving version of the Holocaust
is a legitimate version.
178
508235
5336
08:45
Deborah Lipstadt was found
to have libeled me
179
513595
2184
08:47
when she called me a Holocaust denier.
180
515803
1947
08:49
Ipso facto, I, David Irving,
am not a Holocaust denier."
181
517774
4428
08:54
And what is that version?
182
522226
1712
08:56
There was no plan to murder the Jews,
183
524431
2996
08:59
there were no gas chambers,
184
527451
2052
09:01
there were no mass shootings,
185
529527
1856
09:03
Hitler had nothing to do
with any suffering that went on,
186
531407
3171
09:06
and the Jews have made this all up
187
534602
3805
09:10
to get money from Germany
188
538431
2398
09:12
and to get a state,
189
540853
1707
09:14
and they've done it with the aid
and abettance of the allies --
190
542584
3377
09:17
they've planted the documents
and planted the evidence.
191
545985
3465
09:22
I couldn't let that stand
192
550460
2380
09:24
and ever face a survivor
193
552864
2200
09:27
or a child of survivors.
194
555823
1975
09:29
I couldn't let that stand
195
557822
2152
09:31
and consider myself
a responsible historian.
196
559998
4251
09:37
So we fought.
197
565187
1745
09:38
And for those of you
who haven't seen "Denial,"
198
566956
2282
09:41
spoiler alert:
199
569262
1159
09:42
we won.
200
570445
1218
09:43
(Laughter)
201
571687
1295
09:45
(Applause)
202
573006
2567
09:51
The judge found David Irving
203
579988
4241
09:56
to be a liar,
204
584253
3331
09:59
a racist,
205
587608
1163
10:00
an anti-Semite.
206
588795
1254
10:02
His view of history was tendentious,
207
590073
2360
10:04
he lied, he distorted --
208
592457
1926
10:06
and most importantly,
209
594407
2643
10:09
he did it deliberately.
210
597074
2113
10:11
We showed a pattern,
in over 25 different major instances.
211
599211
4139
10:15
Not small things -- many of us
in this audience write books,
212
603374
3110
10:18
are writing books;
213
606508
1185
10:19
we always make mistakes, that's why
we're glad to have second editions:
214
607717
3466
10:23
correct the mistakes.
215
611207
1186
10:24
(Laughter)
216
612417
1150
10:26
But these always moved
in the same direction:
217
614634
3136
10:30
blame the Jews,
218
618618
2211
10:32
exonerate the Nazis.
219
620853
2175
10:35
But how did we win?
220
623700
1584
10:38
What we did is follow his footnotes
back to his sources.
221
626196
5380
10:44
And what did we find?
222
632190
1783
10:45
Not in most cases,
223
633997
1479
10:47
and not in the preponderance of cases,
224
635500
1968
10:49
but in every single instance where
he made some reference to the Holocaust,
225
637492
4311
10:53
that his supposed evidence was distorted,
226
641827
4242
10:58
half-truth,
227
646093
1420
10:59
date-changed,
228
647537
1334
11:00
sequence-changed,
229
648895
2187
11:03
someone put at a meeting who wasn't there.
230
651106
2124
11:05
In other words,
he didn't have the evidence.
231
653254
2761
11:08
His evidence didn't prove it.
232
656039
2109
11:10
We didn't prove what happened.
233
658172
2659
11:13
We proved that what he said happened --
234
661628
2499
11:16
and by extension, all deniers,
because he either quotes them
235
664151
2860
11:19
or they get their arguments from him --
236
667035
2471
11:21
is not true.
237
669530
1246
11:22
What they claim --
238
670800
1189
11:24
they don't have the evidence to prove it.
239
672013
2622
11:28
So why is my story
more than just the story
240
676609
4744
11:33
of a quirky, long,
six-year, difficult lawsuit,
241
681377
3807
11:37
an American professor
being dragged into a courtroom
242
685208
4989
11:42
by a man that the court
declared in its judgment
243
690221
3044
11:45
was a neo-Nazi polemicist?
244
693289
2250
11:47
What message does it have?
245
695563
1783
11:49
I think in the context
of the question of truth,
246
697800
2973
11:52
it has a very significant message.
247
700797
2462
11:55
Because today,
248
703283
1785
11:57
as we well know,
249
705092
1666
11:58
truth and facts are under assault.
250
706782
4116
12:03
Social media, for all
the gifts it has given us,
251
711702
3252
12:06
has also allowed the difference
between facts -- established facts --
252
714978
5581
12:12
and lies
253
720583
1757
12:14
to be flattened.
254
722364
1398
12:16
Third of all:
255
724990
1510
12:18
extremism.
256
726524
1471
12:20
You may not see Ku Klux Klan robes,
257
728987
3577
12:24
you may not see burning crosses,
258
732588
2071
12:26
you may not even hear outright
white supremacist language.
259
734683
4319
12:31
It may go by names: "alt-right,"
"National Front" -- pick your names.
260
739026
4906
12:35
But underneath, it's that same extremism
that I found in Holocaust denial
261
743956
5835
12:41
parading as rational discourse.
262
749815
3394
12:47
We live in an age
where truth is on the defensive.
263
755134
5217
12:52
I'm reminded of a New Yorker cartoon.
264
760375
2484
12:54
A quiz show recently appeared
in "The New Yorker"
265
762883
2520
12:57
where the host of the quiz show
is saying to one of the contestants,
266
765427
3222
13:00
"Yes, ma'am, you had the right answer.
267
768673
2309
13:03
But your opponent yelled
more loudly than you did,
268
771006
2493
13:05
so he gets the point."
269
773523
1525
13:08
What can we do?
270
776228
1507
13:10
First of all,
271
778557
1377
13:11
we cannot be beguiled
by rational appearances.
272
779958
5431
13:17
We've got to look underneath,
273
785413
1769
13:19
and we will find there the extremism.
274
787206
2801
13:22
Second of all,
275
790991
1986
13:25
we must understand
that truth is not relative.
276
793001
6081
13:33
Number three,
277
801137
1464
13:34
we must go on the offensive,
278
802625
3689
13:38
not the defensive.
279
806338
1773
13:40
When someone makes an outrageous claim,
280
808676
2607
13:43
even though they may hold
one of the highest offices in the land,
281
811307
3504
13:46
if not the world --
282
814835
2011
13:48
we must say to them,
283
816870
1510
13:50
"Where's the proof?
284
818404
1966
13:52
Where's the evidence?"
285
820394
2137
13:54
We must hold their feet to the fire.
286
822555
2927
13:57
We must not treat it as if their lies
are the same as the facts.
287
825506
4606
14:03
And as I said earlier,
truth is not relative.
288
831395
3540
14:06
Many of us have grown up
in the world of the academy
289
834959
2856
14:09
and enlightened liberal thought,
290
837839
1741
14:11
where we're taught
everything is open to debate.
291
839604
2961
14:15
But that's not the case.
292
843164
2014
14:17
There are certain things that are true.
293
845202
3442
14:21
There are indisputable facts --
294
849192
3020
14:24
objective truths.
295
852236
1690
14:26
Galileo taught it to us centuries ago.
296
854519
4817
14:31
Even after being forced
to recant by the Vatican
297
859360
4667
14:36
that the Earth moved around the Sun,
298
864051
2573
14:38
he came out,
299
866648
1154
14:39
and what is he reported to have said?
300
867826
2310
14:42
"And yet, it still moves."
301
870160
3822
14:47
The Earth is not flat.
302
875342
2840
14:50
The climate is changing.
303
878206
2290
14:53
Elvis is not alive.
304
881387
2268
14:55
(Laughter)
305
883679
1535
14:57
(Applause)
306
885238
2316
14:59
And most importantly,
307
887578
2301
15:01
truth and fact are under assault.
308
889903
4649
15:07
The job ahead of us,
309
895289
1610
15:08
the task ahead of us,
310
896923
1203
15:10
the challenge ahead of us
311
898150
1594
15:11
is great.
312
899768
1234
15:13
The time to fight is short.
313
901747
2637
15:17
We must act now.
314
905241
2843
15:20
Later will be too late.
315
908929
3245
15:24
Thank you very much.
316
912198
1262
15:25
(Applause)
317
913484
4046

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Deborah Lipstadt - Historian
Deborah Lipstadt's research focuses on the development of Holocaust denial and how to fight for the truth in an era marked by "alternative facts."

Why you should listen

Dr. Deborah E. Lipstadt, Dorot professor of Holocaust Studies at Emory University in Atlanta, was sued for libel in 1996 by David Irving for having called him a Holocaust denier. After a ten-week trial in London in 2000, in an overwhelming victory for Lipstadt, the judge found Irving to be a "neo-Nazi polemicist" who "perverts" history and engages in "racist" and "anti-Semitic" discourse. The Daily Telegraph (London) described the trial as having "done for the new century what the Nuremberg tribunals or the Eichmann trial did for earlier generations." The Times (London) described it as "history has had its day in court and scored a crushing victory." According to the New York Times, the trial "put an end to the pretense that Mr. Irving is anything but a self-promoting apologist for Hitler."

The movie Denial, starring Rachel Weisz and Tom Wilkenson with a screenplay by David Hare, tells the story of this legal battle.  It is based on Lipstadt's book, History on Trial: My Day in Court with a Holocaust Denier (Harper Collins, 2006), and recently reissued as Denial (Harper Collins, 2016). The film was nominated for a BAFTA as one of the best British films of the year.

Lipstadt has written most recently Holocaust: An American Understanding (Rutgers, 2016), which explores how America has understood and interpreted the Holocaust since 1945.

Her previous book, The Eichmann Trial, (Schocken/Nextbook, 2011) published in commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the Eichmann trial, was called by Publisher's Weekly, "a penetrating and authoritative dissection of a landmark case and its after effects." The New York Times Book Review described Lipstadt as having "done a great service by … recovering the event as a gripping legal drama, as well as a hinge moment in Israel's history and in the world's delayed awakening to the magnitude of the Holocaust."

She has also published Beyond Belief: The American Press And The Coming Of The Holocaust, 1933-1945 (Free Press, 1986), which surveys what the American press wrote about the persecution of the Jews in the years 1933-1945.  She is currently writing a book, The Antisemitic Delusion: Letters to a Concerned Student which will be published in 2018.

At Emory, Lipstadt directs the website known as HDOT, Holocaust Denial on Trial, which contains a complete archive of the proceedings of Irving v. Penguin UK and Deborah Lipstadt. It also provides answers to frequent claims made by deniers. Lipstadt has won the Emery Williams Teaching Award, and she was selected for the award by alumni as the teacher who had most influenced them.

Lipstadt was a historical consultant to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, helping design the section of the Museum dedicated to the American Response to the Holocaust. She has held a Presidential appointment to the United States Holocaust Memorial Council (from Presidents Clinton and Obama) and was asked by President George W. Bush to represent the White House at the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz.

Lipstadt has a BA from the City College of New York and an MA and PhD from Brandeis University.

More profile about the speaker
Deborah Lipstadt | Speaker | TED.com

Data provided by TED.

This site was created in May 2015 and the last update was on January 12, 2020. It will no longer be updated.

We are currently creating a new site called "eng.lish.video" and would be grateful if you could access it.

If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to write comments in your language on the contact form.

Privacy Policy

Developer's Blog

Buy Me A Coffee