TED2011
Dan Ariely: Beware conflicts of interest
Filmed:
Readability: 3.3
1,284,831 views
In this short talk, psychologist Dan Ariely tells two personal stories that explore scientific conflict of interest: How the pursuit of knowledge and insight can be affected, consciously or not, by shortsighted personal goals. When we're thinking about the big questions, he reminds us, let's be aware of our all-too-human brains.
Dan Ariely - Behavioral economist
The dismal science of economics is not as firmly grounded in actual behavior as was once supposed. In "Predictably Irrational," Dan Ariely told us why. Full bio
The dismal science of economics is not as firmly grounded in actual behavior as was once supposed. In "Predictably Irrational," Dan Ariely told us why. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:16
So, I was in the hospital for a long time.
0
1000
3000
00:19
And a few years after I left, I went back,
1
4000
3000
00:22
and the chairman of the burn department was very excited to see me --
2
7000
3000
00:25
said, "Dan, I have a fantastic new treatment for you."
3
10000
3000
00:28
I was very excited. I walked with him to his office.
4
13000
2000
00:30
And he explained to me that, when I shave,
5
15000
3000
00:33
I have little black dots on the left side of my face where the hair is,
6
18000
3000
00:36
but on the right side of my face
7
21000
2000
00:38
I was badly burned so I have no hair,
8
23000
2000
00:40
and this creates lack of symmetry.
9
25000
2000
00:42
And what's the brilliant idea he had?
10
27000
2000
00:44
He was going to tattoo little black dots
11
29000
2000
00:46
on the right side of my face
12
31000
3000
00:49
and make me look very symmetric.
13
34000
2000
00:51
It sounded interesting. He asked me to go and shave.
14
36000
3000
00:54
Let me tell you, this was a strange way to shave,
15
39000
2000
00:56
because I thought about it
16
41000
2000
00:58
and I realized that the way I was shaving then
17
43000
2000
01:00
would be the way I would shave for the rest of my life --
18
45000
2000
01:02
because I had to keep the width the same.
19
47000
2000
01:04
When I got back to his office,
20
49000
2000
01:06
I wasn't really sure.
21
51000
2000
01:08
I said, "Can I see some evidence for this?"
22
53000
2000
01:10
So he showed me some pictures
23
55000
2000
01:12
of little cheeks with little black dots --
24
57000
2000
01:14
not very informative.
25
59000
2000
01:16
I said, "What happens when I grow older and my hair becomes white?
26
61000
2000
01:18
What would happen then?"
27
63000
2000
01:20
"Oh, don't worry about it," he said.
28
65000
2000
01:22
"We have lasers; we can whiten it out."
29
67000
3000
01:25
But I was still concerned,
30
70000
2000
01:27
so I said, "You know what, I'm not going to do it."
31
72000
3000
01:30
And then came one of the biggest guilt trips of my life.
32
75000
4000
01:34
This is coming from a Jewish guy, all right, so that means a lot.
33
79000
3000
01:37
(Laughter)
34
82000
2000
01:39
And he said, "Dan, what's wrong with you?
35
84000
3000
01:42
Do you enjoy looking non-symmetric?
36
87000
2000
01:44
Do you have some kind of perverted pleasure from this?
37
89000
5000
01:49
Do women feel pity for you
38
94000
2000
01:51
and have sex with you more frequently?"
39
96000
3000
01:54
None of those happened.
40
99000
3000
01:58
And this was very surprising to me,
41
103000
2000
02:00
because I've gone through many treatments --
42
105000
2000
02:02
there were many treatments I decided not to do --
43
107000
2000
02:04
and I never got this guilt trip to this extent.
44
109000
2000
02:06
But I decided not to have this treatment.
45
111000
2000
02:08
And I went to his deputy and asked him, "What was going on?
46
113000
2000
02:10
Where was this guilt trip coming from?"
47
115000
2000
02:12
And he explained that they have done this procedure on two patients already,
48
117000
4000
02:16
and they need the third patient for a paper they were writing.
49
121000
3000
02:19
(Laughter)
50
124000
2000
02:21
Now you probably think that this guy's a schmuck.
51
126000
2000
02:23
Right, that's what he seems like.
52
128000
2000
02:25
But let me give you a different perspective on the same story.
53
130000
3000
02:28
A few years ago, I was running some of my own experiments in the lab.
54
133000
3000
02:31
And when we run experiments,
55
136000
2000
02:33
we usually hope that one group will behave differently than another.
56
138000
3000
02:36
So we had one group that I hoped their performance would be very high,
57
141000
3000
02:39
another group that I thought their performance would be very low,
58
144000
3000
02:42
and when I got the results, that's what we got --
59
147000
2000
02:44
I was very happy -- aside from one person.
60
149000
3000
02:47
There was one person in the group
61
152000
2000
02:49
that was supposed to have very high performance
62
154000
2000
02:51
that was actually performing terribly.
63
156000
2000
02:53
And he pulled the whole mean down,
64
158000
2000
02:55
destroying my statistical significance of the test.
65
160000
3000
02:59
So I looked carefully at this guy.
66
164000
2000
03:01
He was 20-some years older than anybody else in the sample.
67
166000
3000
03:04
And I remembered that the old and drunken guy
68
169000
2000
03:06
came one day to the lab
69
171000
2000
03:08
wanting to make some easy cash
70
173000
2000
03:10
and this was the guy.
71
175000
2000
03:12
"Fantastic!" I thought. "Let's throw him out.
72
177000
2000
03:14
Who would ever include a drunken guy in a sample?"
73
179000
3000
03:17
But a couple of days later,
74
182000
2000
03:19
we thought about it with my students,
75
184000
2000
03:21
and we said, "What would have happened if this drunken guy was not in that condition?
76
186000
3000
03:24
What would have happened if he was in the other group?
77
189000
2000
03:26
Would we have thrown him out then?"
78
191000
2000
03:28
We probably wouldn't have looked at the data at all,
79
193000
2000
03:30
and if we did look at the data,
80
195000
2000
03:32
we'd probably have said, "Fantastic! What a smart guy who is performing this low,"
81
197000
3000
03:35
because he would have pulled the mean of the group lower,
82
200000
2000
03:37
giving us even stronger statistical results than we could.
83
202000
3000
03:41
So we decided not to throw the guy out and to rerun the experiment.
84
206000
3000
03:44
But you know, these stories,
85
209000
3000
03:47
and lots of other experiments that we've done on conflicts of interest,
86
212000
3000
03:50
basically kind of bring two points
87
215000
2000
03:52
to the foreground for me.
88
217000
2000
03:54
The first one is that in life we encounter many people
89
219000
3000
03:57
who, in some way or another,
90
222000
3000
04:00
try to tattoo our faces.
91
225000
2000
04:02
They just have the incentives that get them to be blinded to reality
92
227000
3000
04:05
and give us advice that is inherently biased.
93
230000
3000
04:08
And I'm sure that it's something that we all recognize,
94
233000
2000
04:10
and we see that it happens.
95
235000
2000
04:12
Maybe we don't recognize it every time,
96
237000
2000
04:14
but we understand that it happens.
97
239000
2000
04:16
The most difficult thing, of course, is to recognize
98
241000
2000
04:18
that sometimes we too
99
243000
2000
04:20
are blinded by our own incentives.
100
245000
2000
04:22
And that's a much, much more difficult lesson to take into account.
101
247000
3000
04:25
Because we don't see how conflicts of interest work on us.
102
250000
4000
04:29
When I was doing these experiments,
103
254000
2000
04:31
in my mind, I was helping science.
104
256000
2000
04:33
I was eliminating the data
105
258000
2000
04:35
to get the true pattern of the data to shine through.
106
260000
2000
04:37
I wasn't doing something bad.
107
262000
2000
04:39
In my mind, I was actually a knight
108
264000
2000
04:41
trying to help science move along.
109
266000
2000
04:43
But this was not the case.
110
268000
2000
04:45
I was actually interfering with the process with lots of good intentions.
111
270000
3000
04:48
And I think the real challenge is to figure out
112
273000
2000
04:50
where are the cases in our lives
113
275000
2000
04:52
where conflicts of interest work on us,
114
277000
2000
04:54
and try not to trust our own intuition to overcome it,
115
279000
3000
04:57
but to try to do things
116
282000
2000
04:59
that prevent us from falling prey to these behaviors,
117
284000
2000
05:01
because we can create lots of undesirable circumstances.
118
286000
3000
05:05
I do want to leave you with one positive thought.
119
290000
2000
05:07
I mean, this is all very depressing, right --
120
292000
2000
05:09
people have conflicts of interest, we don't see it, and so on.
121
294000
3000
05:12
The positive perspective, I think, of all of this
122
297000
2000
05:14
is that, if we do understand when we go wrong,
123
299000
3000
05:17
if we understand the deep mechanisms
124
302000
2000
05:19
of why we fail and where we fail,
125
304000
2000
05:21
we can actually hope to fix things.
126
306000
2000
05:23
And that, I think, is the hope. Thank you very much.
127
308000
2000
05:25
(Applause)
128
310000
4000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Dan Ariely - Behavioral economistThe dismal science of economics is not as firmly grounded in actual behavior as was once supposed. In "Predictably Irrational," Dan Ariely told us why.
Why you should listen
Dan Ariely is a professor of psychology and behavioral economics at Duke University and a founding member of the Center for Advanced Hindsight. He is the author of the bestsellers Predictably Irrational, The Upside of Irrationality, and The Honest Truth About Dishonesty -- as well as the TED Book Payoff: The Hidden Logic that Shapes Our Motivations.
Through his research and his (often amusing and unorthodox) experiments, he questions the forces that influence human behavior and the irrational ways in which we often all behave.
Dan Ariely | Speaker | TED.com