TED2016
Mariano Sigman: Your words may predict your future mental health
Filmed:
Readability: 4.5
3,146,887 views
Can the way you speak and write today predict your future mental state, even the onset of psychosis? In this fascinating talk, neuroscientist Mariano Sigman reflects on ancient Greece and the origins of introspection to investigate how our words hint at our inner lives and details a word-mapping algorithm that could predict the development of schizophrenia. "We may be seeing in the future a very different form of mental health," Sigman says, "based on objective, quantitative and automated analysis of the words we write, of the words we say."
Mariano Sigman - Neuroscientist
In his provocative, mind-bending book "The Secret Life of the Mind," neuroscientist Mariano Sigman reveals his life’s work exploring the inner workings of the human brain. Full bio
In his provocative, mind-bending book "The Secret Life of the Mind," neuroscientist Mariano Sigman reveals his life’s work exploring the inner workings of the human brain. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:13
We have historical records that allow us
to know how the ancient Greeks dressed,
to know how the ancient Greeks dressed,
0
1006
5150
00:18
how they lived,
1
6180
1254
00:19
how they fought ...
2
7458
1522
00:21
but how did they think?
3
9004
1524
00:23
One natural idea is that the deepest
aspects of human thought --
aspects of human thought --
4
11432
4440
00:27
our ability to imagine,
5
15896
1872
00:29
to be conscious,
6
17792
1397
00:31
to dream --
7
19213
1231
00:32
have always been the same.
8
20468
1619
00:34
Another possibility
9
22872
1499
00:36
is that the social transformations
that have shaped our culture
that have shaped our culture
10
24395
3723
00:40
may have also changed
the structural columns of human thought.
the structural columns of human thought.
11
28142
3785
00:44
We may all have different
opinions about this.
opinions about this.
12
32911
2524
00:47
Actually, it's a long-standing
philosophical debate.
philosophical debate.
13
35459
2717
00:50
But is this question
even amenable to science?
even amenable to science?
14
38644
2727
00:54
Here I'd like to propose
15
42834
2506
00:57
that in the same way we can reconstruct
how the ancient Greek cities looked
how the ancient Greek cities looked
16
45364
4772
01:02
just based on a few bricks,
17
50160
2388
01:04
that the writings of a culture
are the archaeological records,
are the archaeological records,
18
52572
4126
01:08
the fossils, of human thought.
19
56722
2143
01:11
And in fact,
20
59905
1174
01:13
doing some form of psychological analysis
21
61103
2206
01:15
of some of the most ancient
books of human culture,
books of human culture,
22
63333
3544
01:18
Julian Jaynes came up in the '70s
with a very wild and radical hypothesis:
with a very wild and radical hypothesis:
23
66901
5955
01:24
that only 3,000 years ago,
24
72880
2413
01:27
humans were what today
we would call schizophrenics.
we would call schizophrenics.
25
75317
4888
01:33
And he made this claim
26
81753
1508
01:35
based on the fact that the first
humans described in these books
humans described in these books
27
83285
3301
01:38
behaved consistently,
28
86610
1904
01:40
in different traditions
and in different places of the world,
and in different places of the world,
29
88538
3016
01:43
as if they were hearing and obeying voices
30
91578
3532
01:47
that they perceived
as coming from the Gods,
as coming from the Gods,
31
95134
3040
01:50
or from the muses ...
32
98198
1198
01:52
what today we would call hallucinations.
33
100063
2769
01:55
And only then, as time went on,
34
103888
2626
01:58
they began to recognize
that they were the creators,
that they were the creators,
35
106538
3651
02:02
the owners of these inner voices.
36
110213
2515
02:05
And with this, they gained introspection:
37
113316
2715
02:08
the ability to think
about their own thoughts.
about their own thoughts.
38
116055
2483
02:11
So Jaynes's theory is that consciousness,
39
119785
3397
02:15
at least in the way we perceive it today,
40
123206
3166
02:18
where we feel that we are the pilots
of our own existence --
of our own existence --
41
126396
3540
02:21
is a quite recent cultural development.
42
129960
2737
02:25
And this theory is quite spectacular,
43
133456
1786
02:27
but it has an obvious problem
44
135266
1433
02:28
which is that it's built on just a few
and very specific examples.
and very specific examples.
45
136723
3992
02:33
So the question is whether the theory
46
141085
1763
02:34
that introspection built up in human
history only about 3,000 years ago
history only about 3,000 years ago
47
142872
4751
02:39
can be examined in a quantitative
and objective manner.
and objective manner.
48
147647
2984
02:43
And the problem of how
to go about this is quite obvious.
to go about this is quite obvious.
49
151543
3563
02:47
It's not like Plato woke up one day
and then he wrote,
and then he wrote,
50
155130
3460
02:50
"Hello, I'm Plato,
51
158614
1659
02:52
and as of today, I have
a fully introspective consciousness."
a fully introspective consciousness."
52
160297
2889
02:55
(Laughter)
53
163210
2293
02:57
And this tells us actually
what is the essence of the problem.
what is the essence of the problem.
54
165527
3333
03:01
We need to find the emergence
of a concept that's never said.
of a concept that's never said.
55
169467
4055
03:06
The word introspection
does not appear a single time
does not appear a single time
56
174434
4310
03:10
in the books we want to analyze.
57
178768
1919
03:13
So our way to solve this
is to build the space of words.
is to build the space of words.
58
181728
4087
03:18
This is a huge space
that contains all words
that contains all words
59
186571
3287
03:21
in such a way that the distance
between any two of them
between any two of them
60
189882
2802
03:24
is indicative of how
closely related they are.
closely related they are.
61
192708
2883
03:28
So for instance,
62
196460
1151
03:29
you want the words "dog" and "cat"
to be very close together,
to be very close together,
63
197635
2897
03:32
but the words "grapefruit" and "logarithm"
to be very far away.
to be very far away.
64
200556
3831
03:36
And this has to be true
for any two words within the space.
for any two words within the space.
65
204809
3896
03:41
And there are different ways
that we can construct the space of words.
that we can construct the space of words.
66
209626
3341
03:44
One is just asking the experts,
67
212991
1643
03:46
a bit like we do with dictionaries.
68
214658
1896
03:48
Another possibility
69
216896
1428
03:50
is following the simple assumption
that when two words are related,
that when two words are related,
70
218348
3715
03:54
they tend to appear in the same sentences,
71
222087
2349
03:56
in the same paragraphs,
72
224460
1453
03:57
in the same documents,
73
225937
1770
03:59
more often than would be expected
just by pure chance.
just by pure chance.
74
227731
3182
04:04
And this simple hypothesis,
75
232231
2050
04:06
this simple method,
76
234305
1306
04:07
with some computational tricks
77
235635
1607
04:09
that have to do with the fact
78
237266
1389
04:10
that this is a very complex
and high-dimensional space,
and high-dimensional space,
79
238679
3064
04:13
turns out to be quite effective.
80
241767
1665
04:16
And just to give you a flavor
of how well this works,
of how well this works,
81
244155
2802
04:18
this is the result we get when
we analyze this for some familiar words.
we analyze this for some familiar words.
82
246981
3912
04:23
And you can see first
83
251607
1185
04:24
that words automatically organize
into semantic neighborhoods.
into semantic neighborhoods.
84
252816
3278
04:28
So you get the fruits, the body parts,
85
256118
2217
04:30
the computer parts,
the scientific terms and so on.
the scientific terms and so on.
86
258359
2425
04:33
The algorithm also identifies
that we organize concepts in a hierarchy.
that we organize concepts in a hierarchy.
87
261119
4222
04:37
So for instance,
88
265852
1151
04:39
you can see that the scientific terms
break down into two subcategories
break down into two subcategories
89
267027
3597
04:42
of the astronomic and the physics terms.
90
270648
2100
04:45
And then there are very fine things.
91
273338
2246
04:47
For instance, the word astronomy,
92
275608
1905
04:49
which seems a bit bizarre where it is,
93
277537
1815
04:51
is actually exactly where it should be,
94
279376
2048
04:53
between what it is,
95
281448
1595
04:55
an actual science,
96
283067
1270
04:56
and between what it describes,
97
284361
1536
04:57
the astronomical terms.
98
285921
1492
05:00
And we could go on and on with this.
99
288182
1891
05:02
Actually, if you stare
at this for a while,
at this for a while,
100
290097
2060
05:04
and you just build random trajectories,
101
292181
1858
05:06
you will see that it actually feels
a bit like doing poetry.
a bit like doing poetry.
102
294063
3166
05:10
And this is because, in a way,
103
298018
1882
05:11
walking in this space
is like walking in the mind.
is like walking in the mind.
104
299924
2940
05:16
And the last thing
105
304027
1617
05:17
is that this algorithm also identifies
what are our intuitions,
what are our intuitions,
106
305668
4040
05:21
of which words should lead
in the neighborhood of introspection.
in the neighborhood of introspection.
107
309732
3896
05:25
So for instance,
108
313652
1223
05:26
words such as "self," "guilt,"
"reason," "emotion,"
"reason," "emotion,"
109
314899
3979
05:30
are very close to "introspection,"
110
318902
1889
05:32
but other words,
111
320815
1151
05:33
such as "red," "football,"
"candle," "banana,"
"candle," "banana,"
112
321990
2167
05:36
are just very far away.
113
324181
1452
05:38
And so once we've built the space,
114
326054
2762
05:40
the question of the history
of introspection,
of introspection,
115
328840
2826
05:43
or of the history of any concept
116
331690
2333
05:46
which before could seem abstract
and somehow vague,
and somehow vague,
117
334047
4779
05:50
becomes concrete --
118
338850
1604
05:52
becomes amenable to quantitative science.
119
340478
2738
05:56
All that we have to do is take the books,
120
344216
2762
05:59
we digitize them,
121
347002
1381
06:00
and we take this stream
of words as a trajectory
of words as a trajectory
122
348407
2809
06:03
and project them into the space,
123
351240
1969
06:05
and then we ask whether this trajectory
spends significant time
spends significant time
124
353233
3754
06:09
circling closely to the concept
of introspection.
of introspection.
125
357011
2992
06:12
And with this,
126
360760
1196
06:13
we could analyze
the history of introspection
the history of introspection
127
361980
2112
06:16
in the ancient Greek tradition,
128
364116
1921
06:18
for which we have the best
available written record.
available written record.
129
366061
2602
06:21
So what we did is we took all the books --
130
369631
2255
06:23
we just ordered them by time --
131
371910
2284
06:26
for each book we take the words
132
374218
1752
06:27
and we project them to the space,
133
375994
1961
06:29
and then we ask for each word
how close it is to introspection,
how close it is to introspection,
134
377979
3032
06:33
and we just average that.
135
381035
1230
06:34
And then we ask whether,
as time goes on and on,
as time goes on and on,
136
382590
3198
06:37
these books get closer,
and closer and closer
and closer and closer
137
385812
3252
06:41
to the concept of introspection.
138
389088
1754
06:42
And this is exactly what happens
in the ancient Greek tradition.
in the ancient Greek tradition.
139
390866
3801
06:47
So you can see that for the oldest books
in the Homeric tradition,
in the Homeric tradition,
140
395698
3127
06:50
there is a small increase with books
getting closer to introspection.
getting closer to introspection.
141
398849
3412
06:54
But about four centuries before Christ,
142
402285
2206
06:56
this starts ramping up very rapidly
to an almost five-fold increase
to an almost five-fold increase
143
404515
4708
07:01
of books getting closer,
and closer and closer
and closer and closer
144
409247
2500
07:03
to the concept of introspection.
145
411771
1682
07:06
And one of the nice things about this
146
414159
2424
07:08
is that now we can ask
147
416607
1198
07:09
whether this is also true
in a different, independent tradition.
in a different, independent tradition.
148
417829
4147
07:14
So we just ran this same analysis
on the Judeo-Christian tradition,
on the Judeo-Christian tradition,
149
422962
3176
07:18
and we got virtually the same pattern.
150
426162
2721
07:21
Again, you see a small increase
for the oldest books in the Old Testament,
for the oldest books in the Old Testament,
151
429548
4635
07:26
and then it increases much more rapidly
152
434207
1914
07:28
in the new books of the New Testament.
153
436145
1839
07:30
And then we get the peak of introspection
154
438008
2032
07:32
in "The Confessions of Saint Augustine,"
155
440064
2127
07:34
about four centuries after Christ.
156
442215
1857
07:36
And this was very important,
157
444897
1944
07:38
because Saint Augustine
had been recognized by scholars,
had been recognized by scholars,
158
446865
3373
07:42
philologists, historians,
159
450262
2172
07:44
as one of the founders of introspection.
160
452458
2078
07:47
Actually, some believe him to be
the father of modern psychology.
the father of modern psychology.
161
455060
3297
07:51
So our algorithm,
162
459012
1839
07:52
which has the virtue
of being quantitative,
of being quantitative,
163
460875
2842
07:55
of being objective,
164
463741
1263
07:57
and of course of being extremely fast --
165
465028
2016
07:59
it just runs in a fraction of a second --
166
467068
2397
08:01
can capture some of the most
important conclusions
important conclusions
167
469489
3503
08:05
of this long tradition of investigation.
168
473016
2222
08:08
And this is in a way
one of the beauties of science,
one of the beauties of science,
169
476317
3651
08:11
which is that now this idea
can be translated
can be translated
170
479992
3476
08:15
and generalized to a whole lot
of different domains.
of different domains.
171
483492
2571
08:18
So in the same way that we asked
about the past of human consciousness,
about the past of human consciousness,
172
486769
4767
08:23
maybe the most challenging question
we can pose to ourselves
we can pose to ourselves
173
491560
3406
08:26
is whether this can tell us something
about the future of our own consciousness.
about the future of our own consciousness.
174
494990
4137
08:31
To put it more precisely,
175
499550
1470
08:33
whether the words we say today
176
501044
2416
08:35
can tell us something
of where our minds will be in a few days,
of where our minds will be in a few days,
177
503484
5197
08:40
in a few months
178
508705
1151
08:41
or a few years from now.
179
509880
1182
08:43
And in the same way many of us
are now wearing sensors
are now wearing sensors
180
511597
3020
08:46
that detect our heart rate,
181
514641
1786
08:48
our respiration,
182
516451
1269
08:49
our genes,
183
517744
1667
08:51
on the hopes that this may
help us prevent diseases,
help us prevent diseases,
184
519435
3651
08:55
we can ask whether monitoring
and analyzing the words we speak,
and analyzing the words we speak,
185
523110
3521
08:58
we tweet, we email, we write,
186
526655
2683
09:01
can tell us ahead of time whether
something may go wrong with our minds.
something may go wrong with our minds.
187
529362
4808
09:07
And with Guillermo Cecchi,
188
535087
1534
09:08
who has been my brother in this adventure,
189
536645
3001
09:11
we took on this task.
190
539670
1555
09:14
And we did so by analyzing
the recorded speech of 34 young people
the recorded speech of 34 young people
191
542228
5532
09:19
who were at a high risk
of developing schizophrenia.
of developing schizophrenia.
192
547784
2801
09:23
And so what we did is,
we measured speech at day one,
we measured speech at day one,
193
551434
2881
09:26
and then we asked whether the properties
of the speech could predict,
of the speech could predict,
194
554339
3242
09:29
within a window of almost three years,
195
557605
2496
09:32
the future development of psychosis.
196
560125
2035
09:35
But despite our hopes,
197
563427
2366
09:37
we got failure after failure.
198
565817
3117
09:41
There was just not enough
information in semantics
information in semantics
199
569793
3882
09:45
to predict the future
organization of the mind.
organization of the mind.
200
573699
2793
09:48
It was good enough
201
576516
1809
09:50
to distinguish between a group
of schizophrenics and a control group,
of schizophrenics and a control group,
202
578349
4175
09:54
a bit like we had done
for the ancient texts,
for the ancient texts,
203
582548
2712
09:57
but not to predict the future
onset of psychosis.
onset of psychosis.
204
585284
2994
10:01
But then we realized
205
589164
1706
10:02
that maybe the most important thing
was not so much what they were saying,
was not so much what they were saying,
206
590894
4088
10:07
but how they were saying it.
207
595006
1673
10:09
More specifically,
208
597679
1220
10:10
it was not in which semantic
neighborhoods the words were,
neighborhoods the words were,
209
598923
2827
10:13
but how far and fast they jumped
210
601774
2600
10:16
from one semantic neighborhood
to the other one.
to the other one.
211
604398
2301
10:19
And so we came up with this measure,
212
607247
1731
10:21
which we termed semantic coherence,
213
609002
2389
10:23
which essentially measures the persistence
of speech within one semantic topic,
of speech within one semantic topic,
214
611415
4804
10:28
within one semantic category.
215
616243
1529
10:31
And it turned out to be
that for this group of 34 people,
that for this group of 34 people,
216
619294
4047
10:35
the algorithm based on semantic
coherence could predict,
coherence could predict,
217
623365
3659
10:39
with 100 percent accuracy,
218
627048
2500
10:41
who developed psychosis and who will not.
219
629572
2507
10:44
And this was something
that could not be achieved --
that could not be achieved --
220
632976
2937
10:47
not even close --
221
635937
1508
10:49
with all the other
existing clinical measures.
existing clinical measures.
222
637469
3126
10:54
And I remember vividly,
while I was working on this,
while I was working on this,
223
642525
3579
10:58
I was sitting at my computer
224
646128
2317
11:00
and I saw a bunch of tweets by Polo --
225
648469
2635
11:03
Polo had been my first student
back in Buenos Aires,
back in Buenos Aires,
226
651128
3167
11:06
and at the time
he was living in New York.
he was living in New York.
227
654319
2070
11:08
And there was something in this tweets --
228
656413
2088
11:10
I could not tell exactly what
because nothing was said explicitly --
because nothing was said explicitly --
229
658525
3501
11:14
but I got this strong hunch,
230
662050
2021
11:16
this strong intuition,
that something was going wrong.
that something was going wrong.
231
664095
2955
11:20
So I picked up the phone,
and I called Polo,
and I called Polo,
232
668347
2723
11:23
and in fact he was not feeling well.
233
671094
1919
11:25
And this simple fact,
234
673362
1937
11:27
that reading in between the lines,
235
675323
2491
11:29
I could sense,
through words, his feelings,
through words, his feelings,
236
677838
4262
11:34
was a simple, but very
effective way to help.
effective way to help.
237
682124
2619
11:37
What I tell you today
238
685987
1638
11:39
is that we're getting
close to understanding
close to understanding
239
687649
2508
11:42
how we can convert this intuition
that we all have,
that we all have,
240
690181
4286
11:46
that we all share,
241
694491
1365
11:47
into an algorithm.
242
695880
1197
11:50
And in doing so,
243
698102
1461
11:51
we may be seeing in the future
a very different form of mental health,
a very different form of mental health,
244
699587
4650
11:56
based on objective, quantitative
and automated analysis
and automated analysis
245
704261
5621
12:01
of the words we write,
246
709906
1709
12:03
of the words we say.
247
711639
1537
12:05
Gracias.
248
713200
1151
12:06
(Applause)
249
714375
6883
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Mariano Sigman - NeuroscientistIn his provocative, mind-bending book "The Secret Life of the Mind," neuroscientist Mariano Sigman reveals his life’s work exploring the inner workings of the human brain.
Why you should listen
Mariano Sigman, a physicist by training, is a leading figure in the cognitive neuroscience of learning and decision making. Sigman was awarded a Human Frontiers Career Development Award, the National Prize of Physics, the Young Investigator Prize of "College de France," the IBM Scalable Data Analytics Award and is a scholar of the James S. McDonnell Foundation. In 2016 he was made a Laureate of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences.
In The Secret Life of the Mind, Sigman's ambition is to explain the mind so that we can understand ourselves and others more deeply. He shows how we form ideas during our first days of life, how we give shape to our fundamental decisions, how we dream and imagine, why we feel certain emotions, how the brain transforms and how who we are changes with it. Spanning biology, physics, mathematics, psychology, anthropology, linguistics, philosophy and medicine, as well as gastronomy, magic, music, chess, literature and art, The Secret Life of the Mind revolutionizes how neuroscience serves us in our lives, revealing how the infinity of neurons inside our brains manufacture how we perceive, reason, feel, dream and communicate.
Mariano Sigman | Speaker | TED.com