TEDGlobal 2009
David Deutsch: A new way to explain explanation
Filmed:
Readability: 5
1,268,796 views
For tens of thousands of years our ancestors understood the world through myths, and the pace of change was glacial. The rise of scientific understanding transformed the world within a few centuries. Why? Physicist David Deutsch proposes a subtle answer.
David Deutsch - Quantum physicist
David Deutsch's 1997 book "The Fabric of Reality" laid the groundwork for an all-encompassing Theory of Everything, and galvanized interest in the idea of a quantum computer, which could solve problems of hitherto unimaginable complexity. Full bio
David Deutsch's 1997 book "The Fabric of Reality" laid the groundwork for an all-encompassing Theory of Everything, and galvanized interest in the idea of a quantum computer, which could solve problems of hitherto unimaginable complexity. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:18
I'm sure that, throughout the hundred-thousand-odd years
0
0
5000
00:23
of our species' existence,
1
5000
3000
00:26
and even before,
2
8000
3000
00:29
our ancestors looked up at the night sky,
3
11000
2000
00:31
and wondered what stars are.
4
13000
3000
00:34
Wondering, therefore,
5
16000
2000
00:36
how to explain what they saw
6
18000
4000
00:40
in terms of things unseen.
7
22000
5000
00:45
Okay, so, most people
8
27000
4000
00:49
only wondered that occasionally, like today,
9
31000
3000
00:52
in breaks from whatever
10
34000
2000
00:54
normally preoccupied them.
11
36000
2000
00:56
But what normally preoccupied them
12
38000
4000
01:00
also involved yearning to know.
13
42000
3000
01:03
They wished they knew
14
45000
3000
01:06
how to prevent their food supply
15
48000
2000
01:08
from sometimes failing,
16
50000
2000
01:10
and how they could rest when they were tired
17
52000
3000
01:13
without risking starvation,
18
55000
4000
01:17
be warmer, cooler, safer,
19
59000
4000
01:21
in less pain.
20
63000
2000
01:23
I bet those prehistoric cave artists
21
65000
3000
01:26
would have loved to know
22
68000
2000
01:28
how to draw better.
23
70000
2000
01:30
In every aspect of their lives,
24
72000
5000
01:35
they wished for progress, just as we do.
25
77000
5000
01:40
But they failed, almost completely, to make any.
26
82000
6000
01:46
They didn't know how to.
27
88000
3000
01:49
Discoveries like fire
28
91000
4000
01:53
happened so rarely, that from an individual's point of view,
29
95000
4000
01:57
the world never improved.
30
99000
3000
02:00
Nothing new was learned.
31
102000
4000
02:04
The first clue to the origin of starlight
32
106000
3000
02:07
happened as recently as 1899: radioactivity.
33
109000
7000
02:14
Within 40 years,
34
116000
2000
02:16
physicists discovered the whole explanation,
35
118000
4000
02:20
expressed, as usual, in elegant symbols.
36
122000
5000
02:25
But never mind the symbols.
37
127000
2000
02:27
Think how many discoveries
38
129000
4000
02:31
they represent.
39
133000
2000
02:33
Nuclei and nuclear reactions, of course.
40
135000
3000
02:36
But isotopes, particles of electricity,
41
138000
7000
02:43
antimatter,
42
145000
4000
02:47
neutrinos,
43
149000
2000
02:49
the conversion of mass to energy -- that's E=mc^2 --
44
151000
4000
02:53
gamma rays,
45
155000
2000
02:55
transmutation.
46
157000
4000
02:59
That ancient dream that had always eluded the alchemists
47
161000
5000
03:04
was achieved through these same theories
48
166000
2000
03:06
that explained starlight
49
168000
2000
03:08
and other ancient mysteries,
50
170000
3000
03:11
and new, unexpected phenomena.
51
173000
3000
03:14
That all that, discovered in 40 years,
52
176000
4000
03:18
had not been in the previous hundred thousand,
53
180000
3000
03:21
was not for lack of thinking
54
183000
4000
03:25
about stars, and all those other urgent problems they had.
55
187000
4000
03:29
They even arrived at answers,
56
191000
3000
03:32
such as myths,
57
194000
2000
03:34
that dominated their lives,
58
196000
2000
03:36
yet bore almost no resemblance
59
198000
4000
03:40
to the truth.
60
202000
2000
03:42
The tragedy of that protracted stagnation
61
204000
5000
03:47
isn't sufficiently recognized, I think.
62
209000
2000
03:49
These were people with brains of
63
211000
2000
03:51
essentially the same design
64
213000
3000
03:54
that eventually did discover all those things.
65
216000
5000
03:59
But that ability to make progress
66
221000
4000
04:03
remained almost unused,
67
225000
3000
04:06
until the event that
68
228000
3000
04:09
revolutionized the human condition
69
231000
2000
04:11
and changed the universe.
70
233000
2000
04:13
Or so we should hope.
71
235000
2000
04:15
Because that event was the
72
237000
2000
04:17
Scientific Revolution,
73
239000
2000
04:19
ever since which our knowledge
74
241000
2000
04:21
of the physical world,
75
243000
2000
04:23
and of how to adapt it to our wishes,
76
245000
4000
04:27
has been growing relentlessly.
77
249000
2000
04:29
Now, what had changed?
78
251000
3000
04:32
What were people now doing for the first time
79
254000
2000
04:34
that made that difference
80
256000
2000
04:36
between stagnation
81
258000
2000
04:38
and rapid, open-ended discovery?
82
260000
4000
04:42
How to make that difference
83
264000
2000
04:44
is surely the most important universal truth
84
266000
4000
04:48
that it is possible to know.
85
270000
2000
04:50
Worryingly, there is no consensus about what it is.
86
272000
5000
04:55
So, I'll tell you.
87
277000
2000
04:57
But I'll have to backtrack a little first.
88
279000
4000
05:01
Before the Scientific Revolution,
89
283000
3000
05:04
they believed that everything important, knowable,
90
286000
3000
05:07
was already known,
91
289000
2000
05:09
enshrined in ancient writings, institutions,
92
291000
3000
05:12
and in some genuinely useful rules of thumb --
93
294000
3000
05:15
which were, however, entrenched as dogmas,
94
297000
4000
05:19
along with many falsehoods.
95
301000
2000
05:21
So they believed that knowledge came from authorities
96
303000
4000
05:25
that actually knew very little.
97
307000
3000
05:28
And therefore progress
98
310000
3000
05:31
depended on learning how to reject
99
313000
3000
05:34
the authority of learned men,
100
316000
3000
05:37
priests, traditions and rulers.
101
319000
4000
05:41
Which is why the Scientific Revolution
102
323000
3000
05:44
had to have a wider context.
103
326000
2000
05:46
The Enlightenment, a revolution in how
104
328000
4000
05:50
people sought knowledge,
105
332000
3000
05:53
trying not to rely on authority.
106
335000
3000
05:56
"Take no one's word for it."
107
338000
2000
05:58
But that can't be what made the difference.
108
340000
4000
06:02
Authorities had been rejected before, many times.
109
344000
2000
06:04
And that rarely, if ever,
110
346000
2000
06:06
caused anything like the Scientific Revolution.
111
348000
4000
06:10
At the time, what they thought
112
352000
2000
06:12
distinguished science
113
354000
2000
06:14
was a radical idea about things unseen,
114
356000
4000
06:18
known as empiricism.
115
360000
3000
06:21
All knowledge derives from the senses.
116
363000
5000
06:26
Well, we've seen that that can't be true.
117
368000
3000
06:29
It did help by promoting
118
371000
4000
06:33
observation and experiment.
119
375000
2000
06:35
But, from the outset, it was obvious
120
377000
2000
06:37
that there was something horribly wrong with it.
121
379000
3000
06:40
Knowledge comes from the senses.
122
382000
2000
06:42
In what language? Certainly not the language of mathematics,
123
384000
3000
06:45
in which, Galileo rightly said,
124
387000
3000
06:48
the book of nature is written.
125
390000
3000
06:51
Look at the world. You don't see equations
126
393000
3000
06:54
carved on to the mountainsides.
127
396000
3000
06:57
If you did, it would be because people
128
399000
2000
06:59
had carved them.
129
401000
2000
07:01
By the way, why don't we do that?
130
403000
3000
07:04
What's wrong with us?
131
406000
2000
07:06
(Laughter)
132
408000
1000
07:07
Empiricism is inadequate
133
409000
2000
07:09
because, well,
134
411000
2000
07:11
scientific theories explain the seen in terms of the unseen.
135
413000
5000
07:16
And the unseen, you have to admit,
136
418000
2000
07:18
doesn't come to us through the senses.
137
420000
2000
07:20
We don't see those nuclear reactions in stars.
138
422000
4000
07:24
We don't see the origin of species.
139
426000
3000
07:27
We don't see the curvature of space-time,
140
429000
4000
07:31
and other universes.
141
433000
2000
07:33
But we know about those things.
142
435000
3000
07:36
How?
143
438000
2000
07:38
Well, the classic empiricist answer is induction.
144
440000
5000
07:43
The unseen resembles the seen.
145
445000
4000
07:47
But it doesn't.
146
449000
2000
07:49
You know what the clinching evidence was
147
451000
2000
07:51
that space-time is curved?
148
453000
3000
07:54
It was a photograph, not of space-time,
149
456000
3000
07:57
but of an eclipse, with a dot there rather than there.
150
459000
4000
08:01
And the evidence for evolution?
151
463000
2000
08:03
Some rocks and some finches.
152
465000
3000
08:06
And parallel universes? Again: dots there,
153
468000
3000
08:09
rather than there, on a screen.
154
471000
2000
08:11
What we see, in all these cases,
155
473000
3000
08:14
bears no resemblance to the reality
156
476000
4000
08:18
that we conclude is responsible --
157
480000
2000
08:20
only a long chain of theoretical reasoning
158
482000
4000
08:24
and interpretation connects them.
159
486000
2000
08:26
"Ah!" say creationists.
160
488000
3000
08:29
"So you admit it's all interpretation.
161
491000
2000
08:31
No one has ever seen evolution.
162
493000
3000
08:34
We see rocks.
163
496000
2000
08:36
You have your interpretation. We have ours.
164
498000
3000
08:39
Yours comes from guesswork,
165
501000
2000
08:41
ours from the Bible."
166
503000
2000
08:43
But what creationist and empiricists both ignore
167
505000
6000
08:49
is that, in that sense,
168
511000
2000
08:51
no one has ever seen a bible either,
169
513000
3000
08:54
that the eye only detects light, which we don't perceive.
170
516000
4000
08:58
Brains only detect nerve impulses.
171
520000
3000
09:01
And they don't perceive even those as what they really are,
172
523000
3000
09:04
namely electrical crackles.
173
526000
2000
09:06
So we perceive nothing as what it really is.
174
528000
5000
09:11
Our connection to reality
175
533000
3000
09:14
is never just perception.
176
536000
2000
09:16
It's always, as Karl Popper put it,
177
538000
4000
09:20
theory-laden.
178
542000
3000
09:23
Scientific knowledge isn't derived from anything.
179
545000
3000
09:26
It's like all knowledge. It's conjectural, guesswork,
180
548000
5000
09:31
tested by observation,
181
553000
2000
09:33
not derived from it.
182
555000
4000
09:37
So, were testable conjectures
183
559000
3000
09:40
the great innovation that opened the intellectual prison gates?
184
562000
4000
09:44
No. Contrary to what's usually said,
185
566000
3000
09:47
testability is common,
186
569000
2000
09:49
in myths and all sorts of other irrational modes of thinking.
187
571000
4000
09:53
Any crank claiming the sun will go out next Tuesday
188
575000
4000
09:57
has got a testable prediction.
189
579000
3000
10:00
Consider the ancient Greek myth
190
582000
3000
10:03
explaining seasons.
191
585000
3000
10:06
Hades, God of the Underworld,
192
588000
2000
10:08
kidnaps Persephone, the Goddess of Spring,
193
590000
3000
10:11
and negotiates a forced marriage contract,
194
593000
3000
10:14
requiring her to return regularly, and lets her go.
195
596000
4000
10:18
And each year,
196
600000
2000
10:20
she is magically compelled to return.
197
602000
3000
10:23
And her mother, Demeter,
198
605000
2000
10:25
Goddess of the Earth,
199
607000
2000
10:27
is sad, and makes it cold and barren.
200
609000
5000
10:32
That myth is testable.
201
614000
3000
10:35
If winter is caused by Demeter's sadness,
202
617000
4000
10:39
then it must happen everywhere on Earth simultaneously.
203
621000
4000
10:43
So if the ancient Greeks had only known that Australia
204
625000
3000
10:46
is at its warmest when Demeter is at her saddest,
205
628000
4000
10:50
they'd have known that their theory is false.
206
632000
3000
10:53
So what was wrong with that myth,
207
635000
3000
10:56
and with all pre-scientific thinking,
208
638000
3000
10:59
and what, then, made that momentous difference?
209
641000
5000
11:04
I think there is one thing you have to care about.
210
646000
4000
11:08
And that implies
211
650000
2000
11:10
testability, the scientific method,
212
652000
3000
11:13
the Enlightenment, and everything.
213
655000
2000
11:15
And here is the crucial thing.
214
657000
2000
11:17
There is such a thing as a defect in a story.
215
659000
3000
11:20
I don't just mean a logical defect. I mean a bad explanation.
216
662000
5000
11:25
What does that mean? Well, explanation
217
667000
3000
11:28
is an assertion about what's there, unseen,
218
670000
3000
11:31
that accounts for what's seen.
219
673000
3000
11:34
Because the explanatory role
220
676000
3000
11:37
of Persephone's marriage contract
221
679000
2000
11:39
could be played equally well
222
681000
2000
11:41
by infinitely many other
223
683000
2000
11:43
ad hoc entities.
224
685000
2000
11:45
Why a marriage contract and not any other reason
225
687000
3000
11:48
for regular annual action?
226
690000
4000
11:52
Here is one. Persephone wasn't released.
227
694000
3000
11:55
She escaped, and returns every spring
228
697000
4000
11:59
to take revenge on Hades,
229
701000
2000
12:01
with her Spring powers.
230
703000
2000
12:03
She cools his domain with Spring air,
231
705000
5000
12:08
venting heat up to the surface, creating summer.
232
710000
4000
12:12
That accounts for the same phenomena as the original myth.
233
714000
4000
12:16
It's equally testable.
234
718000
3000
12:19
Yet what it asserts about reality
235
721000
3000
12:22
is, in many ways, the opposite.
236
724000
2000
12:24
And that is possible because
237
726000
2000
12:26
the details of the original myth
238
728000
3000
12:29
are unrelated to seasons,
239
731000
2000
12:31
except via the myth itself.
240
733000
4000
12:35
This easy variability
241
737000
3000
12:38
is the sign of a bad explanation,
242
740000
4000
12:42
because, without a functional reason to prefer
243
744000
4000
12:46
one of countless variants,
244
748000
5000
12:51
advocating one of them, in preference to the others,
245
753000
2000
12:53
is irrational.
246
755000
2000
12:55
So, for the essence of what
247
757000
2000
12:57
makes the difference to enable progress,
248
759000
3000
13:00
seek good explanations,
249
762000
2000
13:02
the ones that can't be easily varied,
250
764000
3000
13:05
while still explaining the phenomena.
251
767000
5000
13:10
Now, our current explanation of seasons
252
772000
3000
13:13
is that the Earth's axis is tilted like that,
253
775000
4000
13:17
so each hemisphere tilts toward the sun for half the year,
254
779000
3000
13:20
and away for the other half.
255
782000
3000
13:23
Better put that up.
256
785000
2000
13:25
(Laughter)
257
787000
1000
13:26
That's a good explanation: hard to vary,
258
788000
5000
13:31
because every detail plays a functional role.
259
793000
3000
13:34
For instance, we know, independently of seasons,
260
796000
3000
13:37
that surfaces tilted away
261
799000
2000
13:39
from radiant heat are heated less,
262
801000
3000
13:42
and that a spinning sphere, in space,
263
804000
3000
13:45
points in a constant direction.
264
807000
3000
13:48
And the tilt also explains
265
810000
3000
13:51
the sun's angle of elevation at different times of year,
266
813000
4000
13:55
and predicts that the seasons
267
817000
2000
13:57
will be out of phase in the two hemispheres.
268
819000
3000
14:00
If they'd been observed in phase,
269
822000
2000
14:02
the theory would have been refuted.
270
824000
2000
14:04
But now, the fact that it's also a good explanation,
271
826000
5000
14:09
hard to vary, makes the crucial difference.
272
831000
5000
14:14
If the ancient Greeks had found out
273
836000
2000
14:16
about seasons in Australia,
274
838000
3000
14:19
they could have easily varied their myth
275
841000
2000
14:21
to predict that.
276
843000
2000
14:23
For instance, when Demeter is upset,
277
845000
2000
14:25
she banishes heat from her vicinity,
278
847000
3000
14:28
into the other hemisphere, where it makes summer.
279
850000
3000
14:31
So, being proved wrong by observation,
280
853000
3000
14:34
and changing their theory accordingly,
281
856000
2000
14:36
still wouldn't have got the ancient Greeks
282
858000
3000
14:39
one jot closer to understanding seasons,
283
861000
3000
14:42
because their explanation was bad: easy to vary.
284
864000
3000
14:45
And it's only when an explanation is good
285
867000
3000
14:48
that it even matters whether it's testable.
286
870000
2000
14:50
If the axis-tilt theory had been refuted,
287
872000
3000
14:53
its defenders would have had nowhere to go.
288
875000
2000
14:55
No easily implemented change
289
877000
3000
14:58
could make that tilt
290
880000
2000
15:00
cause the same seasons in both hemispheres.
291
882000
5000
15:05
The search for hard-to-vary explanations
292
887000
3000
15:08
is the origin of all progress.
293
890000
3000
15:11
It's the basic regulating principle
294
893000
3000
15:14
of the Enlightenment.
295
896000
2000
15:16
So, in science, two false approaches blight progress.
296
898000
4000
15:20
One is well known: untestable theories.
297
902000
3000
15:23
But the more important one is explanationless theories.
298
905000
4000
15:27
Whenever you're told that some existing statistical trend will continue,
299
909000
4000
15:31
but you aren't given a hard-to-vary account
300
913000
3000
15:34
of what causes that trend,
301
916000
3000
15:37
you're being told a wizard did it.
302
919000
2000
15:39
When you are told that carrots have human rights
303
921000
3000
15:42
because they share half our genes --
304
924000
2000
15:44
but not how gene percentages confer rights -- wizard.
305
926000
6000
15:50
When someone announces that the nature-nurture debate
306
932000
4000
15:54
has been settled because there is evidence
307
936000
2000
15:56
that a given percentage of our
308
938000
2000
15:58
political opinions are genetically inherited,
309
940000
4000
16:02
but they don't explain how genes cause opinions,
310
944000
4000
16:06
they've settled nothing. They are saying that our
311
948000
2000
16:08
opinions are caused by wizards,
312
950000
2000
16:10
and presumably so are their own.
313
952000
3000
16:13
That the truth consists of
314
955000
3000
16:16
hard to vary assertions about reality
315
958000
4000
16:20
is the most important fact
316
962000
3000
16:23
about the physical world.
317
965000
2000
16:25
It's a fact that is, itself, unseen,
318
967000
3000
16:28
yet impossible to vary. Thank you.
319
970000
4000
16:32
(Applause)
320
974000
4000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
David Deutsch - Quantum physicistDavid Deutsch's 1997 book "The Fabric of Reality" laid the groundwork for an all-encompassing Theory of Everything, and galvanized interest in the idea of a quantum computer, which could solve problems of hitherto unimaginable complexity.
Why you should listen
David Deutsch will force you to reconsider your place in the world. This legendary Oxford physicist is the leading proponent of the multiverse (or "many worlds") interpretation of quantum theory -- the idea that our universe is constantly spawning countless numbers of parallel worlds.
In his own words: "Everything in our universe -- including you and me, every atom and every galaxy -- has counterparts in these other universes." If that doesn't alter your consciousness, then the other implications he's derived from his study of subatomic physics -- including the possibility of time travel -- just might.
In The Fabric of Reality, Deutsch tied together quantum mechanics, evolution, a rationalist approach to knowledge, and a theory of computation based on the work of Alan Turing. "Our best theories are not only truer than common sense, they make more sense than common sense,"Deutsch wrote, and he continues to explore the most mind-bending aspects of particle physics.
In 2008, he became a member of the Royal Society of London.
David Deutsch | Speaker | TED.com