TEDGlobal 2009
Gordon Brown: Global ethic vs. national interest
Filmed:
Readability: 4.2
627,152 views
Can the interests of an individual nation be reconciled with humanity's greater good? Can a patriotic, nationally elected politician really give people in other countries equal consideration? Following his TEDTalk calling for a global ethic, UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown fields questions from TED Curator Chris Anderson.
Gordon Brown - British Prime Minister
Britain's former prime minister Gordon Brown played a key role in shaping the G20 nations' response to the world's financial crisis, and was a powerful advocate for a coordinated global response to problems such as climate change, poverty and social justice. Full bio
Britain's former prime minister Gordon Brown played a key role in shaping the G20 nations' response to the world's financial crisis, and was a powerful advocate for a coordinated global response to problems such as climate change, poverty and social justice. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:25
Chris Anderson: Thank you so much, Prime Minister,
0
8000
2000
00:27
that was both fascinating and quite inspiring.
1
10000
2000
00:29
So, you're calling for a global ethic.
2
12000
4000
00:33
Would you describe that as global citizenship?
3
16000
4000
00:37
Is that an idea that you believe in, and how would you define that?
4
20000
3000
00:40
Gordon Brown: I think it is about global citizenship. It's about recognizing
5
23000
2000
00:42
our responsibilities to others.
6
25000
2000
00:44
There is so much to do over the next few years
7
27000
4000
00:48
that is obvious to so many of us
8
31000
3000
00:51
to build a better world.
9
34000
2000
00:53
And there is so much shared sense
10
36000
2000
00:55
of what we need to do,
11
38000
2000
00:57
that it is vital that we all come together.
12
40000
2000
00:59
But we don't necessarily have the means to do so.
13
42000
3000
01:02
So there are challenges to be met.
14
45000
2000
01:04
I believe the concept of global citizenship
15
47000
3000
01:07
will simply grow out of people talking to each other across continents.
16
50000
4000
01:11
But then, of course, the task is to create the institutions
17
54000
2000
01:13
that make that global society work.
18
56000
2000
01:15
But I don't think we should underestimate the extent to which
19
58000
2000
01:17
massive changes in technology
20
60000
3000
01:20
make possible the linking up of people across the world.
21
63000
3000
01:23
CA: But people get excited about this idea of global citizenship,
22
66000
4000
01:27
but then they get confused a bit again
23
70000
2000
01:29
when they start thinking about patriotism,
24
72000
2000
01:31
and how to combine these two.
25
74000
2000
01:33
I mean, you're elected as Prime Minister
26
76000
2000
01:35
with a brief to bat for Britain.
27
78000
3000
01:38
How do you reconcile the two things?
28
81000
4000
01:42
GB: Well, of course national identity remains important.
29
85000
3000
01:45
But it's not at the expense of people accepting their global responsibilities.
30
88000
3000
01:48
And I think one of the problems of a recession
31
91000
4000
01:52
is that people become more protectionist,
32
95000
3000
01:55
they look in on themselves,
33
98000
2000
01:57
they try to protect their own nation,
34
100000
2000
01:59
perhaps at the expense of other nations.
35
102000
3000
02:02
When you actually look at the motor of the world economy,
36
105000
3000
02:05
it cannot move forward unless
37
108000
2000
02:07
there is trade between the different countries.
38
110000
3000
02:10
And any nation that would become protectionist over the next few years
39
113000
3000
02:13
would deprive itself of the chance of getting the benefits
40
116000
3000
02:16
of growth in the world economy.
41
119000
2000
02:18
So, you've got to have a healthy sense of patriotism;
42
121000
3000
02:21
that's absolutely important.
43
124000
2000
02:23
But you've got to realize that this world has changed fundamentally,
44
126000
3000
02:26
and the problems that we have cannot be solved
45
129000
2000
02:28
by one nation and one nation alone.
46
131000
2000
02:30
CA: Well, indeed. But what do you do
47
133000
3000
02:33
when the two come into conflict and you're forced to make a decision
48
136000
3000
02:36
that either is in Britain's interest,
49
139000
3000
02:39
or the interest of Britons,
50
142000
2000
02:41
or citizens elsewhere in the world?
51
144000
2000
02:43
GB: Well I think we can persuade people
52
146000
2000
02:45
that what is necessary for Britain's long-term interests,
53
148000
4000
02:49
what is necessary for America's long-term interests,
54
152000
2000
02:51
is proper engagement with the rest of the world,
55
154000
2000
02:53
and taking the action that is necessary.
56
156000
5000
02:58
There is a great story, again, told about Richard Nixon.
57
161000
5000
03:03
1958, Ghana becomes independent,
58
166000
4000
03:07
so it is just over 50 years ago.
59
170000
3000
03:10
Richard Nixon goes to represent the United States government
60
173000
4000
03:14
at the celebrations for independence in Ghana.
61
177000
3000
03:17
And it's one of his first outings as Vice President to an African country.
62
180000
5000
03:22
He doesn't quite know what to do, so he starts going around the crowd
63
185000
3000
03:25
and starts talking to people in the crowd
64
188000
2000
03:27
and he says to people in this rather unique way,
65
190000
2000
03:29
"How does it feel to be free?"
66
192000
3000
03:32
And he's going around, "How does it feel to be free?"
67
195000
2000
03:34
"How does it feel to be free?"
68
197000
2000
03:36
And then someone says, "How should I know? I come from Alabama."
69
199000
3000
03:39
(Laughter)
70
202000
3000
03:42
And that was the 1950s.
71
205000
3000
03:45
Now, what is remarkable
72
208000
3000
03:48
is that civil rights in America were achieved in the 1960s.
73
211000
6000
03:54
But what is equally remarkable
74
217000
2000
03:56
is socioeconomic rights in Africa
75
219000
2000
03:58
have not moved forward very fast
76
221000
3000
04:01
even since the age of colonialism.
77
224000
3000
04:04
And yet, America and Africa
78
227000
2000
04:06
have got a common interest.
79
229000
2000
04:08
And we have got to realize that if we don't link up
80
231000
3000
04:11
with those people who are sensible voices and democratic voices in Africa,
81
234000
4000
04:15
to work together for common causes,
82
238000
2000
04:17
then the danger of Al Qaeda and related groups
83
240000
3000
04:20
making progress in Africa is very big.
84
243000
2000
04:22
So, I would say that what seems sometimes
85
245000
2000
04:24
to be altruism, in relation to Africa,
86
247000
3000
04:27
or in relation to developing countries,
87
250000
2000
04:29
is more than that. It is enlightened self-interest
88
252000
2000
04:31
for us to work with other countries.
89
254000
2000
04:33
And I would say that national interest
90
256000
2000
04:35
and, if you like, what is the global interest
91
258000
2000
04:37
to tackle poverty and climate change
92
260000
2000
04:39
do, in the long run, come together.
93
262000
3000
04:42
And whatever the short-run price for taking action on climate change
94
265000
3000
04:45
or taking action on security, or taking action to provide opportunities
95
268000
2000
04:47
for people for education,
96
270000
2000
04:49
these are prices that are worth paying
97
272000
2000
04:51
so that you build a stronger global society
98
274000
3000
04:54
where people feel able to feel comfortable with each other
99
277000
3000
04:57
and are able to communicate with each other in such a way
100
280000
3000
05:00
that you can actually build stronger links between different countries.
101
283000
3000
05:03
CA: We're in Oxford, which is the home
102
286000
2000
05:05
of philosophical thought experiments.
103
288000
3000
05:08
And so here is one that kind of goes --
104
291000
2000
05:10
I still just want to draw out on this issue.
105
293000
3000
05:13
So, you're on vacation at a nice beach,
106
296000
4000
05:17
and word comes through that there's been a massive earthquake
107
300000
3000
05:20
and that there is a tsunami advancing on the beach.
108
303000
2000
05:22
One end of the beach there is a house
109
305000
3000
05:25
containing a family of five Nigerians.
110
308000
2000
05:27
And at the other end of the beach
111
310000
2000
05:29
there is a single Brit.
112
312000
2000
05:31
You have time to --
113
314000
2000
05:33
(Laughter)
114
316000
1000
05:34
you have time to alert one house. What do you do?
115
317000
3000
05:37
(Laughter)
116
320000
2000
05:39
GB: Modern communications.
117
322000
2000
05:41
(Applause)
118
324000
3000
05:44
Alert both.
119
327000
2000
05:46
(Applause)
120
329000
4000
05:50
I do agree that my responsibility
121
333000
3000
05:53
is first of all to make sure that people in our country are safe.
122
336000
3000
05:56
And I wouldn't like anything that is said today to suggest
123
339000
4000
06:00
that I am diminishing the importance of the responsibility
124
343000
2000
06:02
that each individual leader has for their own country.
125
345000
3000
06:05
But I'm trying to suggest that there is a huge opportunity
126
348000
3000
06:08
open to us that was never open to us before.
127
351000
2000
06:10
But the power to communicate across borders
128
353000
2000
06:12
allows us to organize the world in a different way.
129
355000
4000
06:16
And I think, look at the tsunami, it's a classic example.
130
359000
4000
06:20
Where was the early warning systems?
131
363000
2000
06:22
You know? Where was the world acting together
132
365000
3000
06:25
to deal with the problems that they knew arose
133
368000
3000
06:28
from the potential for earthquakes,
134
371000
2000
06:30
as well as the potential for climate change?
135
373000
2000
06:32
And when the world starts to work together,
136
375000
2000
06:34
with better early warning systems,
137
377000
2000
06:36
then you can deal with some of these problems in a far better way.
138
379000
2000
06:38
I just think we're not seeing, at the moment,
139
381000
2000
06:40
the huge opportunities open to us
140
383000
2000
06:42
by the ability of people to cooperate
141
385000
3000
06:45
in a world where either there was isolationism before
142
388000
3000
06:48
or there was limited alliances based on convenience
143
391000
3000
06:51
which never actually took you to deal with some of the central problems.
144
394000
4000
06:55
CA: But I think this is the frustration that perhaps
145
398000
2000
06:57
a lot people have, like people in the audience here,
146
400000
2000
06:59
where we love the kind of language that you're talking about.
147
402000
3000
07:02
It is inspiring. A lot of us believe
148
405000
2000
07:04
that that has to be the world's future.
149
407000
3000
07:07
And yet, when the situation changes,
150
410000
3000
07:10
you suddenly hear politicians talking as if,
151
413000
3000
07:13
you know, for example, the life of one American soldier
152
416000
3000
07:16
is worth countless numbers of Iraqi civilians.
153
419000
3000
07:19
When the pedal hits the metal,
154
422000
4000
07:23
the idealism can get moved away.
155
426000
3000
07:26
I'm just wondering how --
156
429000
3000
07:29
whether you can see that changing over time,
157
432000
2000
07:31
whether you see in Britain
158
434000
2000
07:33
that there are changing attitudes, and that people are actually
159
436000
3000
07:36
more supportive of the kind of global ethic that you talk about.
160
439000
5000
07:41
GB: I think every religion, every faith,
161
444000
3000
07:44
and I'm not just talking here to people of faith or religion --
162
447000
3000
07:47
it has this global ethic at the center
163
450000
2000
07:49
of its credo.
164
452000
2000
07:51
And whether it's Jewish or whether it's Muslim
165
454000
3000
07:54
or whether it's Hindu, or whether it's Sikh,
166
457000
3000
07:57
the same global ethic is at the heart
167
460000
2000
07:59
of each of these religions.
168
462000
3000
08:02
So, I think you're dealing with something
169
465000
2000
08:04
that people instinctively
170
467000
2000
08:06
see as part of that moral sense.
171
469000
3000
08:09
So you're building on something that is not pure self-interest.
172
472000
4000
08:13
You're building on people's ideas and values --
173
476000
4000
08:17
that perhaps they're candles that
174
480000
2000
08:19
burn very dimly on certain occasions.
175
482000
4000
08:23
But it is a set of values that cannot, in my view, be extinguished.
176
486000
4000
08:27
Then the question is,
177
490000
2000
08:29
how do you make that change happen?
178
492000
3000
08:32
How do you persuade people
179
495000
2000
08:34
that it is in their interest
180
497000
2000
08:36
to build strong ... After the Second World War,
181
499000
3000
08:39
we built institutions, the United Nations,
182
502000
3000
08:42
the IMF, the World Bank,
183
505000
2000
08:44
the World Trade Organization, the Marshall Plan.
184
507000
2000
08:46
There was a period in which people talked about an act of creation,
185
509000
4000
08:50
because these institutions were so new.
186
513000
2000
08:52
But they are now out of date. They don't deal with the problems.
187
515000
2000
08:54
As I said, you can't deal with the environmental problem
188
517000
2000
08:56
through existing institutions.
189
519000
2000
08:58
You can't deal with the security problem in the way that you need to.
190
521000
4000
09:02
You can't deal with the economic and financial problem.
191
525000
2000
09:04
So we have got to rebuild our global institutions,
192
527000
3000
09:07
build them in a way that is suitable to the challenges of this time.
193
530000
3000
09:10
And I believe that if you look at the biggest challenge we face,
194
533000
3000
09:13
it is to persuade people to have the confidence
195
536000
3000
09:16
that we can build a truly global society
196
539000
3000
09:19
with the institutions that are founded on these rules.
197
542000
3000
09:22
So, I come back to my initial point.
198
545000
2000
09:24
Sometimes you think things are impossible.
199
547000
2000
09:26
Nobody would have said 50 years ago
200
549000
2000
09:28
that apartheid would have gone in 1990,
201
551000
2000
09:30
or that the Berlin wall would have fallen
202
553000
2000
09:32
at the turn of the '80s and '90s,
203
555000
3000
09:35
or that polio could be eradicated, or that perhaps 60 years ago
204
558000
3000
09:38
nobody would have said that a man could have gone to the moon.
205
561000
2000
09:40
All these things have happened.
206
563000
2000
09:42
By tackling the impossible, you make the impossible possible.
207
565000
3000
09:45
CA: And we have had a speaker who said that very thing,
208
568000
4000
09:49
and swallowed a sword right after that, which was quite dramatic.
209
572000
3000
09:52
(Laughter)
210
575000
1000
09:53
GB: Followed my sword will swallow.
211
576000
3000
09:56
CA: But, surely a true global ethic
212
579000
3000
09:59
is for someone to say,
213
582000
2000
10:01
"I believe the life of every human on the planet
214
584000
3000
10:04
is worth the same, equal consideration,
215
587000
3000
10:07
regardless of nationality and religion."
216
590000
3000
10:10
And you have politicians who have --
217
593000
3000
10:13
you're elected. In a way, you can't say that.
218
596000
3000
10:16
Even if, as a human being, you believe that,
219
599000
2000
10:18
you can't say that. You're elected for Britain's interests.
220
601000
3000
10:21
GB: We have a responsibility to protect.
221
604000
3000
10:24
I mean look, 1918, the Treaty of Versailles,
222
607000
4000
10:28
and all the treaties before that, the Treaty of Westphalia and everything else,
223
611000
3000
10:31
were about protecting the sovereign right of individual countries
224
614000
3000
10:34
to do what they want.
225
617000
2000
10:36
Since then, the world has moved forward,
226
619000
2000
10:38
partly as a result of what happened with the Holocaust,
227
621000
3000
10:41
and people's concern about the rights of individuals
228
624000
3000
10:44
within territories where they need protection,
229
627000
3000
10:47
partly because of what we saw in Rwanda,
230
630000
3000
10:50
partly because of what we saw in Bosnia.
231
633000
2000
10:52
The idea of the responsibility to protect
232
635000
2000
10:54
all individuals who are in situations
233
637000
2000
10:56
where they are at humanitarian risk
234
639000
2000
10:58
is now being established as a principle which governs the world.
235
641000
3000
11:01
So, while I can't automatically say
236
644000
4000
11:05
that Britain will rush to the aid
237
648000
3000
11:08
of any citizen of any country, in danger,
238
651000
3000
11:11
I can say that Britain is in a position
239
654000
3000
11:14
where we're working with other countries
240
657000
2000
11:16
so that this idea that you have a responsibility
241
659000
2000
11:18
to protect people who are victims of either genocide
242
661000
3000
11:21
or humanitarian attack,
243
664000
3000
11:24
is something that is accepted by the whole world.
244
667000
2000
11:26
Now, in the end, that can only be achieved
245
669000
2000
11:28
if your international institutions work well enough
246
671000
2000
11:30
to be able to do so.
247
673000
2000
11:32
And that comes back to what the future role of the United Nations,
248
675000
3000
11:35
and what it can do, actually is.
249
678000
2000
11:37
But, the responsibility to protect
250
680000
2000
11:39
is a new idea that is, in a sense,
251
682000
2000
11:41
taken over from the idea of
252
684000
2000
11:43
self-determination as the principle governing the international community.
253
686000
4000
11:47
CA: Can you picture, in our lifetimes,
254
690000
2000
11:49
a politician ever going out on a platform
255
692000
3000
11:52
of the kind of full-form global ethic, global citizenship?
256
695000
5000
11:57
And basically saying that "I believe that all people across the planet
257
700000
6000
12:03
have equal consideration, and if in power
258
706000
2000
12:05
we will act in that way.
259
708000
2000
12:07
And we believe that the people of this country
260
710000
2000
12:09
are also now global citizens and will support that ethic ..."
261
712000
3000
12:12
GB: Is that not what we're doing
262
715000
2000
12:14
in the debate about climate change?
263
717000
2000
12:16
We're saying that you cannot solve the problem of climate change in one country;
264
719000
5000
12:21
you've got to involve all countries.
265
724000
2000
12:23
You're saying that you must, and you have a duty to help
266
726000
4000
12:27
those countries that cannot afford to deal with
267
730000
2000
12:29
the problems of climate change themselves.
268
732000
2000
12:31
You're saying you want a deal with all the different countries of the world
269
734000
4000
12:35
where we're all bound together
270
738000
2000
12:37
to cutting carbon emissions in a way that is to the benefit of the whole world.
271
740000
4000
12:41
We've never had this before because Kyoto didn't work.
272
744000
4000
12:45
If you could get a deal at Copenhagen,
273
748000
3000
12:48
where people agreed, A, that there was
274
751000
2000
12:50
a long-term target for carbon emission cuts,
275
753000
2000
12:52
B, that there was short-range targets that had to be met
276
755000
3000
12:55
so this wasn't just abstract;
277
758000
2000
12:57
it was people actually making decisions now
278
760000
2000
12:59
that would make a difference now,
279
762000
2000
13:01
and if you could then find a financing mechanism
280
764000
2000
13:03
that meant that the poorest countries that had been hurt
281
766000
3000
13:06
by our inability to deal with climate change
282
769000
2000
13:08
over many, many years and decades
283
771000
2000
13:10
are given special help so that they can move
284
773000
3000
13:13
to energy-efficient technologies,
285
776000
2000
13:15
and they are in a position financially
286
778000
3000
13:18
to be able to afford the long-term investment
287
781000
2000
13:20
that is associated with cutting carbon emissions,
288
783000
3000
13:23
then you are treating the world equally,
289
786000
4000
13:27
by giving consideration to every part of the planet
290
790000
3000
13:30
and the needs they have.
291
793000
2000
13:32
It doesn't mean that everybody does exactly the same thing,
292
795000
2000
13:34
because we've actually got to do more financially
293
797000
3000
13:37
to help the poorest countries, but it does mean there is equal consideration
294
800000
3000
13:40
for the needs of citizens
295
803000
3000
13:43
in a single planet.
296
806000
2000
13:45
CA: Yes. And then of course the theory is still
297
808000
2000
13:47
that those talks get rent apart by different countries
298
810000
3000
13:50
fighting over their own individual interests.
299
813000
2000
13:52
GB: Yes, but I think Europe has got a position,
300
815000
2000
13:54
which is 27 countries have already come together.
301
817000
5000
13:59
I mean, the great difficulty in Europe is if
302
822000
1000
14:00
you're at a meeting and 27 people speak,
303
823000
2000
14:02
it takes a very very long time.
304
825000
2000
14:04
But we did get an agreement on climate change.
305
827000
4000
14:08
America has made its first disposition on this
306
831000
3000
14:11
with the bill that President Obama should be congratulated
307
834000
4000
14:15
for getting through Congress.
308
838000
2000
14:17
Japan has made an announcement.
309
840000
2000
14:19
China and India have signed up to the scientific evidence.
310
842000
3000
14:22
And now we've got to move them to accept
311
845000
3000
14:25
a long-term target, and then short-term targets.
312
848000
3000
14:28
But more progress has been made, I think, in the last few weeks
313
851000
2000
14:30
than had been made for some years.
314
853000
2000
14:32
And I do believe
315
855000
2000
14:34
that there is a strong possibility
316
857000
2000
14:36
that if we work together, we can get that agreement to Copenhagen.
317
859000
3000
14:39
I certainly have been putting forward proposals
318
862000
2000
14:41
that would have allowed the poorest parts of the world
319
864000
3000
14:44
to feel that we have taken into account
320
867000
3000
14:47
their specific needs.
321
870000
2000
14:49
And we would help them adapt.
322
872000
2000
14:51
And we would help them make the transition to a low carbon economy.
323
874000
3000
14:54
I do think a reform of the international institutions is vital to this.
324
877000
4000
14:58
When the IMF was created in the 1940s,
325
881000
3000
15:01
it was created with resources that were five percent or so of the world's GDP.
326
884000
3000
15:04
The IMF now has limited resources, one percent.
327
887000
3000
15:07
It can't really make the difference that ought to be made in a period of crisis.
328
890000
3000
15:10
So, we've got to rebuild the world institutions.
329
893000
3000
15:13
And that's a big task: persuading
330
896000
2000
15:15
all the different countries with the different voting shares
331
898000
2000
15:17
in these institutions to do so.
332
900000
2000
15:19
There is a story told about the three world leaders
333
902000
4000
15:23
of the day getting a chance to get some advice from God.
334
906000
5000
15:28
And the story is told that Bill Clinton went to God
335
911000
3000
15:31
and he asked when there will be
336
914000
3000
15:34
successful climate change and a low carbon economy.
337
917000
5000
15:39
And God shook his head and said, "Not this year,
338
922000
2000
15:41
not this decade, perhaps not even in your lifetime."
339
924000
3000
15:44
And Bill Clinton walked away in tears
340
927000
3000
15:47
because he had failed to get what he wanted.
341
930000
2000
15:49
And then the story is that Barroso, the president of the European Commission,
342
932000
3000
15:52
went to God and he asked, he said,
343
935000
2000
15:54
"When will we get a recovery of global growth?"
344
937000
5000
15:59
And God said, "Not this year, not in this decade,
345
942000
2000
16:01
perhaps not in your lifetime."
346
944000
2000
16:03
So Barroso walked away crying and in tears.
347
946000
4000
16:07
And then the secretary general of the United Nations
348
950000
4000
16:11
came up to speak to God and said,
349
954000
2000
16:13
"When will our international institutions work?"
350
956000
4000
16:17
And God cried.
351
960000
2000
16:19
(Laughter)
352
962000
2000
16:21
It is very important to recognize
353
964000
5000
16:26
that this reform of institutions
354
969000
3000
16:29
is the next stage after
355
972000
2000
16:31
agreeing upon ourselves
356
974000
2000
16:33
that there is a clear ethic upon which we can build.
357
976000
3000
16:36
CA: Prime Minister, I think there are many in the audience who
358
979000
2000
16:38
are truly appreciative of the efforts you made
359
981000
2000
16:40
in terms of the financial mess we got ourselves into.
360
983000
3000
16:43
And there are certainly many people in the audience
361
986000
3000
16:46
who will be cheering you on as you seek to advance
362
989000
2000
16:48
this global ethic. Thank you so much for coming to TED.
363
991000
3000
16:51
GB: Well, thank you.
364
994000
2000
16:53
(Applause)
365
996000
13000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Gordon Brown - British Prime MinisterBritain's former prime minister Gordon Brown played a key role in shaping the G20 nations' response to the world's financial crisis, and was a powerful advocate for a coordinated global response to problems such as climate change, poverty and social justice.
Why you should listen
During his long term of office, former UK prime minister Gordon Brown became one of the world's most experienced political leaders, with a deep understanding of the global economy based on 10 years' experience as Great Britain's Chancellor of the Exchequer. He has been a key architect of the G8's agreements on poverty and climate change, and has provided a passionate voice to encourage the developed world to aid struggling African countries. He is an advocate of global solutions for global problems -- through both the reinvention of international institution and the advancement of a global ethics.
While prime minister, Brown promoted technology as a tool for economic (and environmental) recovery. With his charge to "count the carbon and the pennies," research on electric cars and residential energy efficiency are slated to become a major part of the UK's recovery plan. He pushed for universal broadband and a general increase in spending on science. And he sought to use new communication tools like Twitter and YouTube as a means to communicate government policy.
Gordon Brown | Speaker | TED.com