TEDxColbyCollege
Daniel H. Cohen: For argument's sake
丹尼尔 科恩: 为了更好的辩论
Filmed:
Readability: 4.3
1,613,190 views
我们为什么辩论？为了驳倒我们的反对者，证明他们是错的，最主要的是，为了赢！。。。没错吧？哲学家丹尼尔 科恩我们最普遍了解的一种把辩论当作战斗，胜者为王败者寇的方式，使我们失去了在持有不同见解是所能获得的真正益处。
Daniel H. Cohen - Philosopher
Philosopher Daniel H. Cohen studies language and the way we argue through reason. Full bio
Philosopher Daniel H. Cohen studies language and the way we argue through reason. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:12
My name is Dan Cohen, and I am academic, as he said.
0
452
3432
我叫丹·科恩，我是个学者，就像主持人介绍的。
00:15
And what that means is that I argue.
1
3884
3760
这意味着我经常需要辩论。
00:19
It's an important part of my life, and I like to argue.
2
7644
2600
这是我生命中的重要组成部分，同时我喜欢辩论。
00:22
And I'm not just an academic, I'm a philosopher,
3
10244
3717
我不仅仅是个学者，我也是个哲学家，
00:25
so I like to think that I'm actually pretty good at arguing.
4
13961
2990
所以我觉得是实际上还是挺擅长辩论的。
00:28
But I also like to think a lot about arguing.
5
16951
3174
但是我也经常思考有关辩论的问题。
00:32
And thinking about arguing, I've come across some puzzles,
6
20125
3541
说起辩论，我曾有过一些困惑，
00:35
and one of the puzzles is that
7
23666
1836
而其中一个困惑是
00:37
as I've been thinking about arguing over the years,
8
25502
2150
我多年前开始考虑如何辩论
00:39
and it's been decades now, I've gotten better at arguing,
9
27652
3555
至今已有二十多年了，我也变得更善于辩论，
00:43
but the more that I argue and the better I get at arguing,
10
31207
3570
但是越是辩论，我就能从中获取更多，
00:46
the more that I lose. And that's a puzzle.
11
34777
3310
同时也失去更多。这就是一个困惑。
00:50
And the other puzzle is that I'm actually okay with that.
12
38087
3171
而另一个困惑就是我其实觉得这没什么大不了的。
00:53
Why is it that I'm okay with losing
13
41258
2115
为什么我会觉得失去一些什么也无关紧要，
00:55
and why is it that I think that good arguers
14
43373
1431
为什么好的辩论者
00:56
are actually better at losing?
15
44804
2132
实际上更善于失去？
00:58
Well, there's some other puzzles.
16
46936
1921
好了，其实我还有以下其他困惑。
01:00
One is, why do we argue? Who benefits from arguments?
17
48857
3585
例如，我们为什么辩论？而谁又从辩论中获益？
01:04
And when I think about arguments now, I'm talking about,
18
52442
2000
需要指出的是当我谈及辩论时，我所指的，
01:06
let's call them academic arguments or cognitive arguments,
19
54442
2758
是所谓学术辩论亦或者认知辩论，
01:09
where something cognitive is at stake.
20
57200
1906
就一些我们知之甚少的方面进行辩论。
01:11
Is this proposition true? Is this theory a good theory?
21
59106
3192
例如我们的认知是否正确？这个理论是不是个好理论？
01:14
Is this a viable interpretation of the data or the text?
22
62298
3883
对于某些数据或者文字这是不是一个很好的解释？
01:18
And so on. I'm not interested really in arguments about
23
66181
2524
以及很多其他的问题。我无心去争论
01:20
whose turn it is to do the dishes or who has to take out the garbage.
24
68705
3463
今天该谁洗碗或者谁应该倒垃圾。
01:24
Yeah, we have those arguments too.
25
72168
2336
当然，我们也会为那些问题争论。
01:26
I tend to win those arguments, because I know the tricks.
26
74504
2488
我经常在那类争论争论中胜出，因为我知道一些技巧。
01:28
But those aren't the important arguments.
27
76992
1191
当时那些辩论没有那么重要。
01:30
I'm interested in academic arguments today,
28
78183
2168
我感兴趣的是那些学术性辩论，
01:32
and here are the things that puzzle me.
29
80351
2170
而接下来这是我感到困惑的事情。
01:34
First, what do good arguers win when they win an argument?
30
82521
5265
首先，当人们赢得一场辩论的时候，作为一个优秀的辩论者，他从中学到了什么
01:39
What do I win if I convince you that
31
87786
2334
如果我能说服你
01:42
utilitarianism isn't really the right framework for thinking about ethical theories?
32
90120
3375
实用主义不能用来解释道德理论的话，我能从中获得什么呢？
01:45
So what do we win when we win an argument?
33
93495
2230
所以我们到底可以从一场辩论中学到什么？
01:47
Even before that, what does it matter to me
34
95725
3101
而且在此之前，
01:50
whether you have this idea that Kant's theory works
35
98826
3241
你是追随康德
01:54
or Mill's the right ethicist to follow?
36
102067
2835
还是密尔又有跟我什么关系呢？
01:56
It's no skin off my back whether you think
37
104902
2699
无论你是否认为
01:59
functionalism is a viable theory of mind.
38
107601
2597
功能主义是否是一个可取的思维方式都对我没有什么影响。
02:02
So why do we even try to argue?
39
110198
2232
所以我们为什么会想去辩论？
02:04
Why do we try to convince other people
40
112430
1821
为什么我们要去说服别人
02:06
to believe things that they don't want to believe?
41
114251
1868
相信那些他们不愿相信的事情？
02:08
And is that even a nice thing to do? Is that a nice way
42
116119
2590
我们到底应不应该这么做？用这种方式去
02:10
to treat another human being, try and make them
43
118709
1728
对待他人，迫使他们
02:12
think something they don't want to think?
44
120437
3094
去思考一些他们不想去思考的东西？
02:15
Well, my answer is going to make reference to
45
123531
2993
好了，为了回答这个问题，
02:18
three models for arguments.
46
126524
1690
让我们来参照三种不同的辩论方式。
02:20
The first model, let's call this the dialectical model,
47
128214
1960
第一种模式，让我们称之为辩证模式，
02:22
is that we think of arguments as war, and you know what that's like.
48
130174
2598
这种模式的辩论更想是打仗，相信你们都经历过。
02:24
There's a lot of screaming and shouting
49
132772
1885
经常充满了尖叫和大喊
02:26
and winning and losing,
50
134657
1243
而且伴有胜负，
02:27
and that's not really a very helpful model for arguing
51
135900
2451
这对于辩论来说不是一个很有帮助的方式
02:30
but it's a pretty common and entrenched model for arguing.
52
138351
2758
却也是相当常见且”侵略性“的方式。
02:33
But there's a second model for arguing: arguments as proofs.
53
141109
3600
这里还有第二种辩论的模式：论证式
02:36
Think of a mathematician's argument.
54
144709
2218
想想数学家的辩论。
02:38
Here's my argument. Does it work? Is it any good?
55
146927
2734
这是我的辩论方式。它有用吗？有什么优点吗？
02:41
Are the premises warranted? Are the inferences valid?
56
149661
4205
我们论证时的前提是正确的吗？我们的推论有效吗？
02:45
Does the conclusion follow from the premises?
57
153866
2736
我们的结论是否由前提推导出来？
02:48
No opposition, no adversariality,
58
156602
2704
没有对立，没有敌意，
02:51
not necessarily any arguing in the adversarial sense.
59
159306
5617
辩论并非必须在一个敌对意识下进行。
02:56
But there's a third model to keep in mind
60
164923
1932
但是我们还应该注意到其实还有第三种方式
02:58
that I think is going to be very helpful,
61
166855
1486
我认为它非常有效，
03:00
and that is arguments as performances,
62
168341
3533
它就是表演式辩论，
03:03
arguments as being in front of an audience.
63
171874
2044
如同在观众面前辩论。
03:05
We can think of a politician trying to present a position,
64
173918
3032
我们可以想想一个政客想要竞选一个职位，
03:08
trying to convince the audience of something.
65
176950
2360
或尝试去让他的观众接受他的政见。
03:11
But there's another twist on this model that I really think is important,
66
179310
3151
但是我认为对这个模式的一个曲解有必要指出，
03:14
namely that when we argue before an audience,
67
182461
3962
亦即当我们在观众面前辩论时，
03:18
sometimes the audience has a more participatory role in the argument,
68
186423
4240
有些时候观众在辩论中起了更重要的参与作用，
03:22
that is, arguments are also audiences in front of juries
69
190663
4502
我们的如同面对了一群陪审团，
03:27
who make a judgment and decide the case.
70
195165
2825
他们判断是非，裁定诉案。
03:29
Let's call this the rhetorical model,
71
197990
1820
让我们称之为修辞模式，
03:31
where you have to tailor your argument to the audience at hand.
72
199810
3943
这种模式下你就要像裁缝一样为观众量身定制一场辩论。
03:35
You know, presenting a sound, well-argued,
73
203753
2497
你要一场听上去激烈讨论，严谨论证的
03:38
tight argument in English before a francophone audience
74
206250
3430
英语辩论，而听众是一群法国人，
03:41
just isn't going to work.
75
209680
1903
那就是白费力气。
03:43
So we have these models -- argument as war,
76
211583
2523
你看我们有这么多辩论模式－－战争式辩论，
03:46
argument as proof, and argument as performance.
77
214106
3794
论证式辩论，表演式辩论。
03:49
Of those three, the argument as war is the dominant one.
78
217900
4300
在这三种模式中，战争式辩论占了主导。
03:54
It dominates how we talk about arguments,
79
222200
2861
它使每当我们提起辩论，就是这种模式。
03:57
it dominates how we think about arguments,
80
225061
2198
这种模式基本代表了我们对辩论的理解，
03:59
and because of that, it shapes how we argue,
81
227259
2862
也因此，它影响了我们辩论的方式，
04:02
our actual conduct in arguments.
82
230121
1778
我们在辩论时的表现。
04:03
Now, when we talk about arguments,
83
231899
1481
如今当我们谈起辩论，
04:05
yeah, we talk in a very militaristic language.
84
233380
2072
我们就会进入一种军国主义的论调。
04:07
We want strong arguments, arguments that have a lot of punch,
85
235452
3467
我们需要具有攻击性的辩论，辩论时就如同给对手的脸上来上几拳，
04:10
arguments that are right on target.
86
238919
1898
最好每个论点都直击要害。
04:12
We want to have our defenses up and our strategies all in order.
87
240817
2935
我们想把自己武装起来，组织好策略去应对。
04:15
We want killer arguments.
88
243752
2398
我们想要击败对手。
04:18
That's the kind of argument we want.
89
246150
2966
那就是我们想要的辩论。
04:21
It is the dominant way of thinking about arguments.
90
249116
2048
这就是一种主流的辩论观。
04:23
When I'm talking about arguments, that's probably
91
251164
1983
当我说到辩论的时候，很可能
04:25
what you thought of, the adversarial model.
92
253147
3337
你马上想到的就是敌对模式。
04:28
But the war metaphor, the war paradigm
93
256484
3537
战争模式这个比方，
04:32
or model for thinking about arguments,
94
260021
1769
或者说是对辩论模式的认知，
04:33
has, I think, deforming effects on how we argue.
95
261790
3158
在我看来正在削弱我们的辩论。
04:36
First it elevates tactics over substance.
96
264948
3347
首先它使辩论的技巧凌驾与观点本身。
04:40
You can take a class in logic, argumentation.
97
268295
2481
你可以去上关于逻辑与辩论的课程。
04:42
You learn all about the subterfuges that people use
98
270776
2504
你可以学到所有人们在辩论中可以使用的诡计
04:45
to try and win arguments, the false steps.
99
273280
1989
以力求去赢得一场辩论，多么愚蠢的方式啊。
04:47
It magnifies the us-versus-them aspect of it.
100
275269
3877
这放大了辩论中我们与他们的对立关系。
04:51
It makes it adversarial. It's polarizing.
101
279146
3245
这使辩论变得敌对。如同以偏振镜来看问题。
04:54
And the only foreseeable outcomes
102
282391
3233
而唯一可预见的结果
04:57
are triumph, glorious triumph, or abject, ignominious defeat.
103
285624
5746
就是胜利，一场欢欣鼓舞的胜利，抑或是卑怯，可耻的失败。
05:03
I think those are deforming effects, and worst of all,
104
291370
2683
我认为那是一种变形效果，最遭的是，
05:06
it seems to prevent things like negotiation
105
294053
2755
这种变形使这种辩论本身看上去不是那么像谈判，
05:08
or deliberation or compromise
106
296808
2531
审议或妥协
05:11
or collaboration.
107
299339
2981
抑或者是一种协作。
05:14
Think about that one. Have you ever entered an argument
108
302320
1996
在参加辩论的时候，你有没有想过
05:16
thinking, "Let's see if we can hash something out
109
304316
3224
让我们看看能不能共同敲定一些事情，
05:19
rather than fight it out. What can we work out together?"
110
307540
3075
而非由一方说服另一方。有什么是我们可以共同协作的？
05:22
And I think the argument-as-war metaphor
111
310615
2296
我觉得辩论如战争的这个比喻
05:24
inhibits those other kinds of resolutions to argumentation.
112
312911
4342
已经盖过了其他的辩论形式。
05:29
And finally, this is really the worst thing,
113
317253
2827
最终，最糟糕的是，
05:32
arguments don't seem to get us anywhere.
114
320080
1857
通过争论我们不会学到什么东西。
05:33
They're dead ends. They are roundabouts
115
321937
2576
这样的辩论就如同一个死胡同。交流中的环状公路
05:36
or traffic jams or gridlock in conversation.
116
324513
3801
交通阻塞或者一个僵局。
05:40
We don't get anywhere.
117
328314
1842
我们停在原地，到不了任何其他地方。
05:42
Oh, and one more thing, and as an educator,
118
330156
2313
噢，其实还有一件事情，作为一个教育工作者，
05:44
this is the one that really bothers me:
119
332469
2111
这里还有一个问题困扰了我很久：
05:46
If argument is war, then there's an implicit equation
120
334580
3719
如果辩论是场战争，那么这也隐含着
05:50
of learning with losing.
121
338299
3617
学习等于失去的意思。
05:53
And let me explain what I mean.
122
341916
1920
让我解释一下我的观点。
05:55
Suppose you and I have an argument.
123
343836
2616
比如说，你和我进行了一场辩论。
05:58
You believe a proposition, P, and I don't.
124
346452
4024
你主张观点，P，但是我不同意。
06:02
And I say, "Well why do you believe P?"
125
350476
1847
然后我说，“好了，为什么你相信P”
06:04
And you give me your reasons.
126
352323
1669
然后你给出了你的理由。
06:05
And I object and say, "Well, what about ...?"
127
353992
2031
然后我反对并说，“好，那关于。。。？”
06:08
And you answer my objection.
128
356023
1862
然后你回答我的反对。
06:09
And I have a question: "Well, what do you mean?
129
357885
2225
然后我提问：“额，你的意思是？
06:12
How does it apply over here?" And you answer my question.
130
360110
3598
那么在这个地方他如何解释？” 然后你又回答了我的问题。
06:15
Now, suppose at the end of the day,
131
363708
1428
现在，假设一天快结束了，
06:17
I've objected, I've questioned,
132
365136
1963
我反对，我提问，
06:19
I've raised all sorts of counter-considerations,
133
367099
3039
我给出了所有反对问题，
06:22
and in every case you've responded to my satisfaction.
134
370138
3762
然后在所有的问题上你都让我满意了。
06:25
And so at the end of the day, I say,
135
373900
2590
然后在一天快要结束的时候，我说，
06:28
"You know what? I guess you're right. P."
136
376490
3850
”你知道吗？我觉得在P这个观点上你没准是对的。“
06:32
So I have a new belief. And it's not just any belief,
137
380340
3657
所以我有了新的见解。但是这不仅仅是一个见解，
06:35
but it's a well-articulated, examined,
138
383997
4574
而是一个阐述清楚的，经过验证的，
06:40
it's a battle-tested belief.
139
388571
2982
同时也是经得起挑战的见解。
06:43
Great cognitive gain. Okay. Who won that argument?
140
391553
4001
多好的结果啊。好了。那谁赢了这场辩论呢？
06:47
Well, the war metaphor seems to force us into saying
141
395554
2961
好了，将辩论作为战争的人们会强迫我们承认
06:50
you won, even though I'm the only one who made any cognitive gain.
142
398515
3449
提出见解那方赢了，即使我才是那个获得新见解的人。
06:53
What did you gain cognitively from convincing me?
143
401964
3873
那么作为说服我的人，他在获得了什么新的见解吗？
06:57
Sure, you got some pleasure out of it, maybe your ego stroked,
144
405837
2805
没错，你从中获得了一些愉悦，或许一些自我安慰
07:00
maybe you get some professional status in the field.
145
408642
3109
或许在你的领域里获得了一些专业声誉。
07:03
This guy's a good arguer.
146
411751
1588
这家伙是个辩论好手。
07:05
But cognitively, now -- just from a cognitive point of view -- who was the winner?
147
413339
4254
但是从认知角度而言，仅仅从认识的角度来看，谁是胜利者？
07:09
The war metaphor forces us into thinking
148
417593
1979
视辩论如战争的人们会强迫我们认为
07:11
that you're the winner and I lost,
149
419572
2940
你是胜者而我是败者，
07:14
even though I gained.
150
422512
2282
即使是我也有所得。
07:16
And there's something wrong with that picture.
151
424794
2201
这个认识本身存在一些错误。
07:18
And that's the picture I really want to change if we can.
152
426995
2816
同时我也想去改变这个认识。
07:21
So how can we find ways to make arguments
153
429811
4814
所以我们如何去进行辩论
07:26
yield something positive?
154
434625
2759
并使之有一些积极的影响呢？
07:29
What we need is new exit strategies for arguments.
155
437384
3738
我们所需要的是一个新的方式来终止一场辩论。
07:33
But we're not going to have new exit strategies for arguments
156
441122
3206
但是我们没有办法找到一个新的方式去终止辩论，
07:36
until we have new entry approaches to arguments.
157
444328
3136
除非我们可以找到一个新的方式去开始一场辩论。
07:39
We need to think of new kinds of arguments.
158
447464
3434
我们需要一种新的辩论方式。
07:42
In order to do that, well,
159
450898
3058
为了找到这种新的方式，
07:45
I don't know how to do that.
160
453956
2183
可是我不知道应该怎么做。
07:48
That's the bad news.
161
456139
1416
这是个坏消息。
07:49
The argument-as-war metaphor is just, it's a monster.
162
457555
3080
视辩论如战争的观点本身就如同是一个怪兽。
07:52
It's just taken up habitation in our mind,
163
460635
2352
这已经成为我们的思维定式了，
07:54
and there's no magic bullet that's going to kill it.
164
462987
1999
而且也没有什么快速有效的办法可以解决它。
07:56
There's no magic wand that's going to make it disappear.
165
464986
2566
我们没有办法就这样让他消失不见。
07:59
I don't have an answer.
166
467552
1653
我不知道该怎么解决。
08:01
But I have some suggestions,
167
469205
1110
但是我确实有一些建议，
08:02
and here's my suggestion.
168
470315
3154
这里是我的建议。
08:05
If we want to think of new kinds of arguments,
169
473469
2129
如果我想要创造一种崭新的辩论方式，
08:07
what we need to do is think of new kinds of arguers.
170
475598
4080
那么我们需要的其实是新的辩论者。
08:11
So try this.
171
479678
2814
所以尝试一下这个。
08:14
Think of all the roles that people play in arguments.
172
482492
4610
想象一下人们在辩论中所扮演的角色。
08:19
There's the proponent and the opponent
173
487102
3001
我需要支持者与反对者
08:22
in an adversarial, dialectical argument.
174
490103
2330
才能进行一场意见相反的，辩证性的辩论。
08:24
There's the audience in rhetorical arguments.
175
492433
2007
在修饰性辩论中，我们需要有观众。
08:26
There's the reasoner in arguments as proofs.
176
494440
3916
在证明式论证中我们需要推理者。
08:30
All these different roles. Now, can you imagine an argument
177
498356
3677
所有这些不同角色。现在，你可以想象在一场辩论中，
08:34
in which you are the arguer, but you're also in the audience
178
502033
3739
你既是辩论者，也是观众
08:37
watching yourself argue?
179
505772
2148
看着你自己的表现？
08:39
Can you imagine yourself watching yourself argue,
180
507920
2960
你能想象你自己看着你自己辩论，
08:42
losing the argument, and yet still, at the end of the argument,
181
510880
3369
在辩论中落败，却仍然在辩论结束后，
08:46
say, "Wow, that was a good argument."
182
514249
4576
觉得，“哦，这是一场不错的辩论。”
08:50
Can you do that? I think you can.
183
518825
3110
你能做到吗？我觉得你能。
08:53
And I think, if you can imagine that kind of argument
184
521935
1998
我觉得如果你可以想象一场辩论，
08:55
where the loser says to the winner
185
523933
1643
败者可以对胜者，
08:57
and the audience and the jury can say,
186
525576
1921
对观众以及裁判们说
08:59
"Yeah, that was a good argument,"
187
527497
1983
“噢，这是一场不错的辩论，”
09:01
then you have imagined a good argument.
188
529480
1803
即使如此你也已经可以想象一场不错的辩论了。
09:03
And more than that, I think you've imagined
189
531283
1819
而且不仅如此，我想你已经可以想象到
09:05
a good arguer, an arguer that's worthy
190
533102
3370
一个好的辩论者，一个你希望
09:08
of the kind of arguer you should try to be.
191
536472
3089
成为的辩论者。
09:11
Now, I lose a lot of arguments.
192
539561
2682
现在，我输掉了很多辩论。
09:14
It takes practice to become a good arguer
193
542243
2575
要成为一个好的辩论者是需要练习的
09:16
in the sense of being able to benefit from losing,
194
544818
1937
尤其是从失败中汲取教训这一点。
09:18
but fortunately, I've had many, many colleagues
195
546755
2676
但是幸运的是，我有很多很多同事
09:21
who have been willing to step up and provide that practice for me.
196
549431
3219
他们愿意为我参与进来并和我一起练习成为好的辩论者。
09:24
Thank you.
197
552650
1193
谢谢。
09:25
(Applause)
198
553843
4109
（掌声）
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Daniel H. Cohen - PhilosopherPhilosopher Daniel H. Cohen studies language and the way we argue through reason.
Why you should listen
Philosopher Daniel H. Cohen specializes in argumentation theory, the study of how we use reason (both verbally and in social contexts) to put forth potentially controversial standpoints. Cohen goes beyond just looking at how we plain ol' argue and looks specifically at the metaphors we use for this systematic reasoning. In his work Cohen argues for new, non-combatative metaphors for argument.
Cohen is a Professor of Philosophy at Colby College in Waterville, Maine.
Daniel H. Cohen | Speaker | TED.com